[Bug 745383] Review request: rubygem-shindo - Simple depth first Ruby testing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745383 Bohuslav Kabrda changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-10-14 02:04:47 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 738162] Review request: rubygem-oauth-active-resource - An OAuth enabled ActiveResource wrapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738162 --- Comment #2 from Bohuslav Kabrda 2011-10-14 02:02:44 EDT --- Fixed few minorities (see changelog). SPEC: http://bkabrda.fedorapeople.org/oauth-active-resource/rubygem-oauth-active-resource.spec SRPM: bkabrda.fedorapeople.org/oauth-active-resource/rubygem-oauth-active-resource-0.4.7-2.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742559] Review Request: perl-CatalystX-REPL - Read-eval-print-loop for debugging your Catalyst application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742559 --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell 2011-10-13 22:57:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > > A "spelling error" as usual... No problem. The incorrect FSF address is worth > to file a bug upstream. Thanks, yet again. Upstream is using Dist-Zilla, so should automatically pick up the updated license with the next release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 713990] Review Request: bzr-fastimport - Bzr plugin for fast loading of data from other VCS tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713990 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-13 21:31:28 EDT --- bzr-fastimport-0.11.0-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bzr-fastimport-0.11.0-2.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 713990] Review Request: bzr-fastimport - Bzr plugin for fast loading of data from other VCS tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713990 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 713984] Review Request: python-fastimport - Python parser for fastimport (VCS interchange format)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713984 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-13 20:55:22 EDT --- python-fastimport-0.9.0-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-fastimport-0.9.0-2.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 713984] Review Request: python-fastimport - Python parser for fastimport (VCS interchange format)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713984 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 743162] Review Request: python-concurrentloghandler - Concurrent logging handler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=743162 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 743162] Review Request: python-concurrentloghandler - Concurrent logging handler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=743162 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-13 20:06:42 EDT --- python-concurrentloghandler-0.8.4-4.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-concurrentloghandler-0.8.4-4.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710648] Review Request: clusterPy - Custom analytical geographic regionalization
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710648 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||clusterPy-0.9.9-3.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-10-13 19:55:20 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-13 19:55:20 EDT --- clusterPy-0.9.9-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 740782] Review Request: drupal7-job_scheduler - Simple API for scheduling tasks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740782 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||drupal7-job_scheduler-2.0-0 ||.1.alpha2.fc15 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-13 19:54:41 EDT --- drupal7-job_scheduler-2.0-0.1.alpha2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 740778] Review Request: drupal7-features - Provides feature management for Drupal
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740778 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||drupal7-features-1.0-0.1.be ||ta4.fc15 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-13 19:55:38 EDT --- drupal7-features-1.0-0.1.beta4.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652971] Review Request: code-editor - A text/code editor based on Qt Creator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652971 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|code-editor-2.3.0-10.fc16 |code-editor-2.3.0-10.fc15 --- Comment #57 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-13 19:54:23 EDT --- code-editor-2.3.0-10.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 530688] Review Request: ghc-language-c - Haskell language-c library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530688 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||ghc-language-c-0.4.2-3.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed|2010-06-03 00:14:42 |2011-10-13 19:53:32 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-13 19:53:32 EDT --- ghc-language-c-0.4.2-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 740834] Review Request: drupal7-pathauto - Automatically generates path aliases
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740834 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||drupal7-pathauto-1.0-0.1.rc ||2.fc15 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-13 19:51:53 EDT --- drupal7-pathauto-1.0-0.1.rc2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 740855] Review Request: drupal7-flexifilter - Allows non-admins to create their own, configurable custom filters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740855 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||drupal7-flexifilter-1.0-0.1 ||.beta1.fc15 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-13 19:52:05 EDT --- drupal7-flexifilter-1.0-0.1.beta1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 740849] Review Request: drupal7-strongarm - Strongarm gives a way to override the default variable values
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740849 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||drupal7-strongarm-2.0-0.1.b ||eta3.fc15 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-13 19:52:29 EDT --- drupal7-strongarm-2.0-0.1.beta3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 740820] Review Request: drupal7-feeds - An import and aggregation framework for Drupal
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740820 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||drupal7-feeds-2.0-0.1.alpha ||4.fc15 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-13 19:53:13 EDT --- drupal7-feeds-2.0-0.1.alpha4.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 740458] Review Request: drupal7-auto_nodetitle - A small and efficient module that allows hiding of the content title
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740458 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||drupal7-auto_nodetitle-1.0- ||1.fc15 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-13 19:53:21 EDT --- drupal7-auto_nodetitle-1.0-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690025] Review Request: cminpack - Solver for nonlinear equations and nonlinear least squares problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690025 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-13 18:44:13 EDT --- cminpack-1.1.3-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cminpack-1.1.3-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690025] Review Request: cminpack - Solver for nonlinear equations and nonlinear least squares problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690025 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-13 18:43:56 EDT --- cminpack-1.1.3-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cminpack-1.1.3-1.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690025] Review Request: cminpack - Solver for nonlinear equations and nonlinear least squares problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690025 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690025] Review Request: cminpack - Solver for nonlinear equations and nonlinear least squares problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690025 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-13 18:44:04 EDT --- cminpack-1.1.3-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cminpack-1.1.3-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711893] Review Request: rubygem-dnsruby - Ruby DNS(SEC) implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711893 Paul Wouters changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Paul Wouters 2011-10-13 18:26:23 EDT --- ooh oops. i totally forgot about that New Package SCM Request === Package Name: rubygem-dnsruby Short Description: Ruby DNS(SEC) implementation Owners: pwouters Branches: f15 f16 el5 el6 InitialCC: pwouters -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 741142] znc-infobot PackageReview - Infobot plugin for ZNC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741142 --- Comment #5 from Keiran Smith 2011-10-13 18:22:04 EDT --- Sorry I made a mistake new SCM Request New Package SCM Request === Package Name: znc-infobot Short Description: User module for ZNC that provides bot sommands Owners: affix nb Branches: f14 f15 f16 el5 el6 InitialCC: N/A -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 741142] znc-infobot PackageReview - Infobot plugin for ZNC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741142 Keiran Smith changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Keiran Smith 2011-10-13 18:16:43 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: znc-infobot Short Description: User module for ZNC that provides bot sommands Owners: affix nb Branches: f14 f15 f16 el6 InitialCC: N/A -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 741142] znc-infobot PackageReview - Infobot plugin for ZNC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741142 Nick Bebout changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Nick Bebout 2011-10-13 18:14:05 EDT --- Approved, with the changes noted in comment 2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 744339] Review Request: dieharder - Random number generator tester and timer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744339 --- Comment #6 from Jiri Hladky 2011-10-13 17:39:06 EDT --- Hello, I have informed the author of the software to check all the gcc warnings. He is looking into it. @Ralf: could you please comment on -I/usr/include issue? How can I fix it? Thanks Jirka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742559] Review Request: perl-CatalystX-REPL - Read-eval-print-loop for debugging your Catalyst application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742559 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742559] Review Request: perl-CatalystX-REPL - Read-eval-print-loop for debugging your Catalyst application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742559 --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell 2011-10-13 16:30:38 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-CatalystX-REPL Short Description: Read-eval-print-loop for debugging your Catalyst application Owners: iarnell Branches: f15 f16 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746079] New: Review Request: rubygem-grit library for extracting info from a git repository in Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-grit library for extracting info from a git repository in Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746079 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-grit library for extracting info from a git repository in Ruby Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jvl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://joev.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-grit.spec SRPM URL: http://joev.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-grit-2.4.1-1.fc15.src.rpm Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3428602 Description: Grit is a Ruby library for extracting information from a git repository in an object oriented manner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683591] Review Request: tclap - Templatized Command Line Argument Parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683591 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-13 16:09:37 EDT --- tclap-1.2.0-4.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tclap-1.2.0-4.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683591] Review Request: tclap - Templatized Command Line Argument Parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683591 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-13 16:09:37 EDT --- tclap-1.2.0-4.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tclap-1.2.0-4.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2011-10-13 15:51:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > > > Minimum requirements for Fedora are still Pentium Pro or newer. > > > Will this run on a Pentium Pro? > > > > Judging from GotoBLAS_01Readme.txt, the minimum CPU is Pentium3 or Athlon. > > If someone still runs older systems, they can use ATLAS instead. > > > > It would be of course possible to limit this package to only, say, x86_64 > > architecture, where it will run on every system. > > OK. By the way, does it build on non-x86? I haven't tried. I'll be taking a two-week vacation now, so I won't be able to look at this until I get back. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683591] Review Request: tclap - Templatized Command Line Argument Parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683591 --- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla 2011-10-13 15:25:49 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683591] Review Request: tclap - Templatized Command Line Argument Parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683591 --- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla 2011-10-13 15:25:49 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683591] Review Request: tclap - Templatized Command Line Argument Parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683591 Bruno Postle changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Bruno Postle 2011-10-13 15:21:55 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: tclap Short Description: Template-Only Command Line Argument Parser Owners: bpostle Branches: f16 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683591] Review Request: tclap - Templatized Command Line Argument Parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683591 Bruno Postle changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Bruno Postle 2011-10-13 15:21:55 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: tclap Short Description: Template-Only Command Line Argument Parser Owners: bpostle Branches: f16 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #7 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2011-10-13 15:11:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > Bundles lapack-3.1.1 sources -> investigate unbundling, if sources are > > necessary to build, contact lapack maintainer to add a -source subpackage > > and BuildRequire it. > > > > Bundles some files from lapack-3.0 sources, at least lapack/getri/*.f. > > Maybe I'll need to ask for an exception. A generic -source package is not > enough, since the build scripts assume a specific version. > > Although, I see that this problem is solved in ATLAS by just BR'ing the static > version of the LAPACK libraries. Maybe the same thing could be done with > OpenBLAS as well. Please do. If you definitely need an exception, please file a ticket to the FPC: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/newticket and be prepared to answer the https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries#Standard_questions > > Minimum requirements for Fedora are still Pentium Pro or newer. > > Will this run on a Pentium Pro? > > Judging from GotoBLAS_01Readme.txt, the minimum CPU is Pentium3 or Athlon. > If someone still runs older systems, they can use ATLAS instead. > > It would be of course possible to limit this package to only, say, x86_64 > architecture, where it will run on every system. OK. By the way, does it build on non-x86? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 744944] Review Request: humanity-icon-theme - Humanity icon theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744944 Mario Blättermann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mari...@freenet.de --- Comment #4 from Mario Blättermann 2011-10-13 15:13:47 EDT --- Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3429303 $ rpmlint -i -v * humanity-icon-theme.src: I: checking humanity-icon-theme.src: I: checking-url https://launchpad.net/humanity/ (timeout 10 seconds) humanity-icon-theme.src: W: invalid-url Source0: humanity-icon-theme-0.5.3.11-without-logos.tar.bz2 The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL. humanity-icon-theme.noarch: I: checking humanity-icon-theme.noarch: I: checking-url https://launchpad.net/humanity/ (timeout 10 seconds) humanity-icon-theme.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/humanity-icon-theme-0.5.3.11/COPYING The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file, possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF. humanity-icon-theme.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: humanity-icon-theme-0.5.3.11-without-logos.tar.bz2 The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL. /home/mariobl/Downloads/Reviews/humanity-icon-theme/humanity-icon-theme-0.5.3.11-2.fc16.src/humanity-icon-theme.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: humanity-icon-theme-0.5.3.11-without-logos.tar.bz2 The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL. 2 packages and 2 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. Your way to generate the tarball isn't canonical. In my mind, you should use the original tarball and run your script in %build. This makes it easier to get the checksum for the tarball. The incorrect FSF address doesn't need to be fixed, but it is worth an upstream bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742559] Review Request: perl-CatalystX-REPL - Read-eval-print-loop for debugging your Catalyst application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742559
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mari...@freenet.de
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Mario Blättermann 2011-10-13 14:36:57
EDT ---
$ rpmlint -i -v *perl-CatalystX-REPL.noarch: I: checking
perl-CatalystX-REPL.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) eval -> veal,
vela, val
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
perl-CatalystX-REPL.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US startup ->
start up, start-up, upstart
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
perl-CatalystX-REPL.noarch: I: checking-url
http://search.cpan.org/dist/CatalystX-REPL/ (timeout 10 seconds)
perl-CatalystX-REPL.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/perl-CatalystX-REPL-0.04/LICENSE
The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or
misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file,
possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF.
perl-CatalystX-REPL.src: I: checking
perl-CatalystX-REPL.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) eval -> veal, vela,
val
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
perl-CatalystX-REPL.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US startup ->
start up, start-up, upstart
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
perl-CatalystX-REPL.src: I: checking-url
http://search.cpan.org/dist/CatalystX-REPL/ (timeout 10 seconds)
perl-CatalystX-REPL.src: I: checking-url
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/F/FL/FLORA/CatalystX-REPL-0.04.tar.gz (timeout
10 seconds)
perl-CatalystX-REPL.spec: I: checking-url
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/F/FL/FLORA/CatalystX-REPL-0.04.tar.gz (timeout
10 seconds)
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings.
A "spelling error" as usual... No problem. The incorrect FSF address is worth
to file a bug upstream.
OK, here we go:
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license.
GPL+ or Artistic
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must
be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source.
$ md5sum *
d1430f331366a491888b323f92413150 CatalystX-REPL-0.04.tar.gz
d1430f331366a491888b323f92413150 CatalystX-REPL-0.04.tar.gz.packaged
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
- Succesful Koji build available.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, ...
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
[.] MUST: If a package installs files below %{_datadir}/icons, the icon cache
must be updated.
[.] MUST: Packages storing shared library files (not just symlinks) must call
ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ...
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in %files.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+] MUST: Packages must not provide RPM dependency information when that
information is not global in nature, or are otherwise handled.
[.] MUST: When filtering automatically generated RPM dependency information,
the filtering system implemented by Fedora must be used.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application.
[.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[.] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), ...
[.] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT conta
[Bug 742555] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-DBIC - Store your sessions via DBIx::Class
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742555 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-13 14:14:27 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-DBIC-0.12-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745219] Review Request: rvm - C library for unstructured recoverable virtual memory
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745219 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-13 14:11:33 EDT --- Package rpc2-2.10-4.fc16, lwp-2.6-4.fc16, rvm-1.17-5.fc16: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing rpc2-2.10-4.fc16 lwp-2.6-4.fc16 rvm-1.17-5.fc16' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-14251 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745216] Review Request: lwp - C library for user-mode threading
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745216 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-13 14:11:21 EDT --- Package rpc2-2.10-4.fc16, lwp-2.6-4.fc16, rvm-1.17-5.fc16: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing rpc2-2.10-4.fc16 lwp-2.6-4.fc16 rvm-1.17-5.fc16' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-14251 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742556] Review Request: perl-Carp-REPL - Read-eval-print-loop on die and/or warn
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742556 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-13 14:13:21 EDT --- perl-Carp-REPL-0.15-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745218] Review Request: rpc2 - C library for remote procedure calls over UDP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745218 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-13 14:11:27 EDT --- Package rpc2-2.10-4.fc16, lwp-2.6-4.fc16, rvm-1.17-5.fc16: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing rpc2-2.10-4.fc16 lwp-2.6-4.fc16 rvm-1.17-5.fc16' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-14251 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742759] Review Request: perl-Text-Aspell - Perl interface to the GNU Aspell library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742759 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-13 14:09:27 EDT --- Package perl-Text-Aspell-0.09-11.fc16: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing perl-Text-Aspell-0.09-11.fc16' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-14232 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742557] Review Request: perl-CatalystX-Profile - Profile your Catalyst application with Devel::NYTProf
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742557 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-13 14:11:58 EDT --- perl-CatalystX-Profile-0.02-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742560] Review Request: perl-CatalystX-SimpleLogin - Provide a simple Login controller which can be reused
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742560 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-13 14:09:49 EDT --- perl-CatalystX-SimpleLogin-0.15-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 744492] Review Request: rtmidi - Library for realtime MIDI input/output
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744492 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-13 14:13:01 EDT --- rtmidi-1.0.15-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 713508] Review Request: rubygem-oauth - OAuth Core Ruby implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713508 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-13 14:09:55 EDT --- rubygem-oauth-0.4.4-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745547] Review Request: svn2cl - Create a ChangeLog from a Subversion log
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745547 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla 2011-10-13 14:03:30 EDT --- I thought I'd unretired it. I hadn't. I have now. It should work for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745547] Review Request: svn2cl - Create a ChangeLog from a Subversion log
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745547 --- Comment #10 from Ville Skyttä 2011-10-13 13:48:40 EDT --- Thanks, Jon. I cannot take ownership of the devel branch in pkgdb though because it is marked deprecated and it seems there's nothing I can do about that, there's no "take ownership" button or the like. Can you? (The EPEL branches can be left deprecated, I don't plan to do anything about them for now.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745547] Review Request: svn2cl - Create a ChangeLog from a Subversion log
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745547 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added CC||l...@jcomserv.net --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla 2011-10-13 13:32:06 EDT --- Don't forget to take ownership of the remaining branches. . . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745547] Review Request: svn2cl - Create a ChangeLog from a Subversion log
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745547 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2011-10-13 13:31:31 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745547] Review Request: svn2cl - Create a ChangeLog from a Subversion log
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745547 Ville Skyttä changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Ville Skyttä 2011-10-13 13:29:07 EDT --- Note to SCM admins: the devel branch is already there and populated, just the F-16 branch is needed. Joe: do you plan to push subversion 1.7.0 to earlier distro versions than F-17? I see there's a build for F-16 it but apparently it is not yet submitted to bodhi. Package Change Request == Package Name: svn2cl New Branches: f16 Owners: scop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746031] New: Review Request: rubygem-aeolus-cli - Command-line interface for working with the Aeolus cloud suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-aeolus-cli - Command-line interface for working with the Aeolus cloud suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746031 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-aeolus-cli - Command-line interface for working with the Aeolus cloud suite Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmo...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://mo.morsi.org/files/rpms/rubygem-aeolus-cli.spec SRPM URL: http://mo.morsi.org/files/rpms/rubygem-aeolus-cli-0.1.0-4.fc15.src.rpm Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3429171 Description: CLI for Aeolus Image Factory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702143] Review Request: wallaby - configuration service for Condor pools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702143 --- Comment #10 from Will Benton 2011-10-13 13:28:29 EDT --- Sorry about that. Wallaby's compressed-tarball script used to generate a git archive of the current release's tag and then pipe that to gzip. I didn't realize that gzip stored modification times in compressed files even when reading from standard input; now the script pipes the git archive to gzip -n. I've fixed the script and uploaded a new package here: http://packages.getwallaby.com/wallaby-0.11.0-4.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745293] Review Request: drupal7-cck cck allows you to add custom fields to nodes using a web browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745293 Scott Dodson changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|review Request: drupal7-cck |Review Request: drupal7-cck |cck allows you to add |cck allows you to add |custom fields to nodes |custom fields to nodes |using a web browser |using a web browser -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742559] Review Request: perl-CatalystX-REPL - Read-eval-print-loop for debugging your Catalyst application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742559 --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell 2011-10-13 12:37:07 EDT --- As with perl-Carp-REPL, Test::Expect is failing in koji, but fine locally under mock. Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-CatalystX-REPL.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-CatalystX-REPL-0.04-2.fc17.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3428803 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745402] Review Request: gtranslator - Gettext po file editor for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745402 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla 2011-10-13 12:32:53 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). At least devel. Beyond that, whatever you feel like supporting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745402] Review Request: gtranslator - Gettext po file editor for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745402 --- Comment #10 from Ignacio Casal Quinteiro (nacho) 2011-10-13 12:15:53 EDT --- am I suppose to take ownership in all branches? or just like I did with f15 and master is ok? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745402] Review Request: gtranslator - Gettext po file editor for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745402 Ignacio Casal Quinteiro (nacho) changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Ignacio Casal Quinteiro (nacho) 2011-10-13 12:13:27 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: gtranslator New Branches: f16 Owners: nacho InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745402] Review Request: gtranslator - Gettext po file editor for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745402 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2011-10-13 12:08:27 EDT --- Unretired. Please take ownership in pkgdb, then submit a Package Change SCM request to add the f16 branch. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745402] Review Request: gtranslator - Gettext po file editor for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745402 --- Comment #7 from Ignacio Casal Quinteiro (nacho) 2011-10-13 11:56:49 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: gtranslator Short Description: Gettext po file editor for GNOME Owners: nacho Branches: f16 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745402] Review Request: gtranslator - Gettext po file editor for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745402 Ignacio Casal Quinteiro (nacho) changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745402] Review Request: gtranslator - Gettext po file editor for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745402 Matěj Cepl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Matěj Cepl 2011-10-13 11:51:17 EDT --- Yes, all issues solved in the current package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742560] Review Request: perl-CatalystX-SimpleLogin - Provide a simple Login controller which can be reused
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742560 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-13 11:52:02 EDT --- perl-CatalystX-SimpleLogin-0.15-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CatalystX-SimpleLogin-0.15-2.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 694479] Review Request: pcl - Library for point cloud processing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694479 --- Comment #2 from Tim Niemueller 2011-10-13 11:49:22 EDT --- I have updated the package to the latest stable release 1.2.0. Spec changed in place, the new SRPM is at http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/robotics/pcl-1.2.0-1.fc15.src.rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745402] Review Request: gtranslator - Gettext po file editor for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745402
Matěj Cepl changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mc...@redhat.com
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #5 from Matěj Cepl 2011-10-13 11:25:27 EDT ---
+ MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.
gtranslator.src: W: strange-permission gtranslator-2.90.6.tar.xz 0444L
A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions.
Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions.
Probably nothing we should be bothered with.
+ MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
There is a conflict with already existing package node, so rename is allowed.
+ MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
+ MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
? MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
+ MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
+ MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.
+ MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
+ MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
+ MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no
upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this.
MD5SUM: 932deb32204bbce2ac4d45f3aa18d8b3
+ MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
Builds in koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3428437
+ MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line.
+ MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
Builds in koji.
+ MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
+ MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
+ MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
+ MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
+ MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
+ MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific situations)
+ MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example.
+ MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
+ MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
+ MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition
of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to
size. Large can refer to either size or quantity).
+ MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run
properly if it is not present.
+ MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
+ MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
+ MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1),
then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel
package.
- MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} =
%{version}-%{release}
+ MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be
removed in the spec if they are
[Bug 745993] New: Review Request: rubygem-useragent - HTTP User Agent parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-useragent - HTTP User Agent parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745993 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-useragent - HTTP User Agent parser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtay...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://martyntaylor.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-useragent.spec SRPM URL: http://martyntaylor.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-useragent-0.4.4-1.fc15.src.rpm Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3428588 Description: UserAgent is a Ruby library that parses and compares HTTP User Agents. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708836] Review Request: jansi-native - Jansi Native implements the JNI Libraries used by the Jansi project.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708836 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla 2011-10-13 11:17:53 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708836] Review Request: jansi-native - Jansi Native implements the JNI Libraries used by the Jansi project.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708836 hannes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||johannes.l...@googlemail.co ||m Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from hannes 2011-10-13 11:16:32 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: jansi-native New Branches: f16 Owners: goldmann hannes InitialCC: A build requirement of jansi, so it needs to be in f16 too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745218] Review Request: rpc2 - C library for remote procedure calls over UDP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745218 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-13 10:20:56 EDT --- rpc2-2.10-4.fc16,lwp-2.6-4.fc16,rvm-1.17-5.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpc2-2.10-4.fc16,lwp-2.6-4.fc16,rvm-1.17-5.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745216] Review Request: lwp - C library for user-mode threading
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745216 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-13 10:20:49 EDT --- rpc2-2.10-4.fc16,lwp-2.6-4.fc16,rvm-1.17-5.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpc2-2.10-4.fc16,lwp-2.6-4.fc16,rvm-1.17-5.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745218] Review Request: rpc2 - C library for remote procedure calls over UDP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745218 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745216] Review Request: lwp - C library for user-mode threading
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745216 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745219] Review Request: rvm - C library for unstructured recoverable virtual memory
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745219 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-13 10:21:02 EDT --- rpc2-2.10-4.fc16,lwp-2.6-4.fc16,rvm-1.17-5.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpc2-2.10-4.fc16,lwp-2.6-4.fc16,rvm-1.17-5.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745219] Review Request: rvm - C library for unstructured recoverable virtual memory
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745219 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745123] Review request: cryptsetup
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745123 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2011-10-13 10:23:07 EDT --- Change made. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708842] Review Request: jansi - Jansi is a java library for generating and interpreting ANSI escape sequences
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708842 hannes changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 707199] Review Request: openstack-nova - OpenStack Compute (nova)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707199 Xavier Bachelot changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xav...@bachelot.org Bug 707199 depends on bug 733238, which changed state. Bug 733238 Summary: Please update to eventlet 0.9.16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733238 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #33 from Xavier Bachelot 2011-10-13 10:18:17 EDT --- Any one taking care of EL6 ? I have a patch against git master that allows building on EL6 if there is interest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708842] Review Request: jansi - Jansi is a java library for generating and interpreting ANSI escape sequences
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708842 hannes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||johannes.l...@googlemail.co ||m --- Comment #9 from hannes 2011-10-13 10:17:30 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: jansi New Branches: f16 Owners: goldmann hannes InitialCC: I would like to add jansi to f16 to make it available as a dep of groovy and don't need to patch it out. So it will make the life easier for the groovy maintainers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708842] Review Request: jansi - Jansi is a java library for generating and interpreting ANSI escape sequences
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708842 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla 2011-10-13 10:18:56 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745123] Review request: cryptsetup
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745123 Milan Broz changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Milan Broz 2011-10-13 09:53:56 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: cryptsetup Short description: A utility for setting up encrypted disks Owners: mbroz [Please can you change short description for package to "* encrypted disks" (filesystems is misleading). Sorry, I missed this problem in initial import - but it should be correct for the future (file system encryption is ecryptfs, so better not to confuse users.) Spec is already fixed in git.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690025] Review Request: cminpack - Solver for nonlinear equations and nonlinear least squares problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690025 Tim Niemueller changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|t...@niemueller.de --- Comment #8 from Tim Niemueller 2011-10-13 08:49:49 EDT --- Sure, forgot about that... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745383] Review request: rubygem-shindo - Simple depth first Ruby testing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745383 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla 2011-10-13 08:44:45 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745219] Review Request: rvm - C library for unstructured recoverable virtual memory
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745219 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2011-10-13 08:43:00 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Also unretired devel, please take ownership in pkgdb. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690025] Review Request: cminpack - Solver for nonlinear equations and nonlinear least squares problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690025 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2011-10-13 08:36:11 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Tim, please take ownership of review BZs. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 743162] Review Request: python-concurrentloghandler - Concurrent logging handler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=743162 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2011-10-13 08:39:31 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Added f16 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 713984] Review Request: python-fastimport - Python parser for fastimport (VCS interchange format)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713984 --- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla 2011-10-13 08:37:07 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Added f16 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 713990] Review Request: bzr-fastimport - Bzr plugin for fast loading of data from other VCS tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713990 --- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla 2011-10-13 08:38:38 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Added f16 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745402] Review Request: gtranslator - Gettext po file editor for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745402 --- Comment #4 from Ignacio Casal Quinteiro (nacho) 2011-10-13 06:25:15 EDT --- Just updated the spec file (same links) and this is the result: gtranslator.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Gettext -> Get text, Get-text, Georgette gtranslator.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) po -> PO, pew, op gtranslator.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gettext -> get text, get-text, Georgette gtranslator.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US po -> PO, pew, op These warnings are fine. gtranslator.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/lib64/gtranslator/plugins/charmap/__init__.py gtranslator.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/lib64/gtranslator/plugins/charmap/panel.py gtranslator-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/gtranslator-3.0/gtranslator/gtr-tab-activatable.h gtranslator-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/gtranslator-3.0/gtranslator/gtr-header.h gtranslator-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/gtranslator-3.0/gtranslator/gtr-profile.h gtranslator-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/gtranslator-3.0/gtranslator/gtr-statusbar.h gtranslator-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/gtranslator-3.0/gtranslator/gtr-window-activatable.h 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 7 errors, 4 warnings. This is already fixed upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745402] Review Request: gtranslator - Gettext po file editor for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745402 --- Comment #3 from Ignacio Casal Quinteiro (nacho) 2011-10-13 06:14:01 EDT --- Just for the sake I just updated the fsf addresses. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745547] Review Request: svn2cl - Create a ChangeLog from a Subversion log
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745547 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2011-10-13 06:00:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Missing %defattr in %files? It's only necessary for EPEL, modern versions of RPM supply the default flags automatically (in addition to BuildRoot tag, cleaning of buildroot etc). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745510] Review Request: vdsm - Virtual Desktop Server Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745510 --- Comment #2 from Federico Simoncelli 2011-10-13 05:52:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Is there a technical reason for the ExclusiveArch: x86_64 ? We (the secondary > architectures) prefer to build packages on all possible architectures. At the moment I am not aware of technical reasons for not building it on secondary architectures. Sadly I cannot guarantee that it will actually work (especially the safelease part) and that its interaction with the other components will be optimal. Moreover it will require libvirt and kvm for most of the tasks so I'm not sure what would be used for on secondary architectures. Anyway if it's just easier and more consistent to build it for all the architectures we could try to fix the build errors (if any). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745510] Review Request: vdsm - Virtual Desktop Server Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745510 Dan Horák changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d...@danny.cz --- Comment #1 from Dan Horák 2011-10-13 05:13:51 EDT --- Is there a technical reason for the ExclusiveArch: x86_64 ? We (the secondary architectures) prefer to build packages on all possible architectures. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736262] Review Request: proxyfuzz - man-in-the-middle non-deterministic network fuzzer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736262 Petr Sklenar changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(mno...@redhat.com ||) --- Comment #3 from Petr Sklenar 2011-10-13 04:36:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > [ proxyfuzz review ] hello, thank you very much for your review. I fixed issues and there is another version: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/psklenar/pub/proxyfuzz/proxyfuzz.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/psklenar/pub/proxyfuzz/proxyfuzz-0.1-20110923.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745547] Review Request: svn2cl - Create a ChangeLog from a Subversion log
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745547 --- Comment #5 from Joe Orton 2011-10-13 04:37:51 EDT --- Thanks a lot for creating the package, Ville. It looks good to me. Missing %defattr in %files? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683591] Review Request: tclap - Templatized Command Line Argument Parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683591
Denis Arnaud changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Resolution|ERRATA |
Keywords||Reopened
--- Comment #17 from Denis Arnaud 2011-10-13
04:15:35 EDT ---
Formal Review
XX: Some work could be performed, optionally.
OK - 1. rpmlint returns neither warning nor error
OK - 2. Package name ('tclap') is fine and matches the spec file name.
OK - 3. Packaging guidelines are met.
OK - 4. License: MIT, which is Fedora approved. Indeed, the text of the
COPYING
file is exactly the same as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License.
Every source file references the COPYING file and repeats the
disclaimer of the MIT license. The spec file references correctly the
MIT license and the dedicated COPYING file is included in the %doc
part
for all the sub-packages.
OK - 5. The spec file is legible and written in American English.
OK - 6. The source file, namely tclap-1.2.0.tar.gz, is the right one.
Its MD5SUM is: f6ea7c05ef62f920d30e4bde5ee3ec8c
XX - 7. The package builds cleanly, at least on x86_64 (and Fedora 15).
There are a few warnings, reported by both the C++ compiler and
Doxygen. Those warnings could be reported upstream.
OK - 8. BuildRequires are fine.
OK - 9. There is no locale. All the filenames are composed of pure ASCII text.
OK - 10. There is neither shared library nor bundle copy of system library.
The package is not designed to be relocatable.
OK - 11. The package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - 12. The package does not mention files more than once, except for the
basic
documentation (license text).
OK - 13. File permissions are set correctly.
OK - 14. The use of macros is consistent, e.g. %{buildroot}. The %{optflags}
macro is not explicitly used, but configure and make correctly take it
into account.
OK - 15. The package contains only source code and permissable content.
OK - 16. The HTML documentation (generated by Doxygen) goes into a dedicated
-doc sub-package. That latter does not affect the runtime library.
OK - 17. Header files are in the dedicated -devel sub-package. Moreover,
as there is neither library nor binary, the main package is empty
(it contains only the basic documentation). See also
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2011-July/007865.html
The -devel sub-package correctly requires the base package using
a fully versioned dependency.
SHOULDs:
OK - 18. Upstream includes a separate file for the license text, namely
COPYING.
OK - 19. No translation of description and summary is available.
OK - 20. mock builds cleanly. The package is noarch.
OK - 21. The package contains a few unit tests, showing that it functions as
described.
OK - 22. There is no scriptlet.
OK - 23. pkgconfig is placed within the dedicated -devel sub-package. See also
item #17 above.
OK - 24. There is no dependency outside of standard Fedora directories.
OK - 25. The package does contain neither script/binary nor library. No man
page
is therefore required.
=== End of Formal Review ==
==> APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
