[Bug 746415] Review Request: ghc-MonadCatchIO-transformers - Exception handling with IO monad transformers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746415 Lakshmi Narasimhan changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lakshminaras2...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737550] Review Request: rubygem-mg - Minimal gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737550
--- Comment #4 from Bohuslav Kabrda 2011-10-17 01:46:56
EDT ---
Some additional comments:
- You should bump the release number, when doing changes, and add the concrete
steps into changelog (use rpmdev-bumspec).
- %doc %{geminstdir}/README.mkd should stay in the main package, as it contains
the licensing information.
- Summary shouldn't end with period, see [1].
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package#Spec_file_pieces_explained
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648247] Review Request: ghc-tagged - Newtype wrappers for phantom types
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648247 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Alias|ghc-tagged | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746557] Review Request: ghc-tagged - Newtype wrappers for phantom types
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||ghc-tagged -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648248] Review Request: ghc-crypto-api - A generic interface for cryptographic operations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648248 Bug 648248 depends on bug 648247, which changed state. Bug 648247 Summary: Review Request: ghc-tagged - Newtype wrappers for phantom types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648247 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||DUPLICATE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648247] Review Request: ghc-tagged - Newtype wrappers for phantom types
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648247 Lakshmi Narasimhan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE Last Closed||2011-10-17 00:51:41 Bug 648247 depends on bug 737228, which changed state. Bug 737228 Summary: Review Request: ghc-data-default - A class for types with a default value https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737228 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #5 from Lakshmi Narasimhan 2011-10-17 00:51:41 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 746557 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746557] Review Request: ghc-tagged - Newtype wrappers for phantom types
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557 Lakshmi Narasimhan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||maths...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Lakshmi Narasimhan 2011-10-17 00:51:41 EDT --- *** Bug 648247 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746557] New: Review Request: ghc-tagged - Newtype wrappers for phantom types
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-tagged - Newtype wrappers for phantom types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557 Summary: Review Request: ghc-tagged - Newtype wrappers for phantom types Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: Ready Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-haskell-l...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Depends on: 648246,737228,742882 Blocks: 648248,713359 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec file: http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-tagged.spec SRPM http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-tagged-0.2.3.1-1.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737228] Review Request: ghc-data-default - A class for types with a default value
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737228 Lakshmi Narasimhan changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||746557 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742882] Review Request: ghc-semigroups - Provides Haskell 98 semigroups
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742882 Lakshmi Narasimhan changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||746557 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648248] Review Request: ghc-crypto-api - A generic interface for cryptographic operations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648248 Lakshmi Narasimhan changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||746557 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648246] Review Request: ghc-data-default - A class for types with a default value
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648246 Lakshmi Narasimhan changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||746557 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742882] Review Request: ghc-semigroups - Provides Haskell 98 semigroups
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742882 --- Comment #4 from Lakshmi Narasimhan 2011-10-17 00:22:23 EDT --- Thanks for the review. >please attend to the missing BR and also please remove "Provides" >from the common_summary. Yes will take care of those while importing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742882] Review Request: ghc-semigroups - Provides Haskell 98 semigroups
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742882 Lakshmi Narasimhan changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Lakshmi Narasimhan 2011-10-17 00:22:55 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ghc-semigroups Short Description: Types for Haskell 98 semigroups Owners: narasim Branches: f14 f15 f16 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746415] Review Request: ghc-MonadCatchIO-transformers - Exception handling with IO monad transformers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746415 Lakshmi Narasimhan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||lakshminaras2...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746415] Review Request: ghc-MonadCatchIO-transformers - Exception handling with IO monad transformers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746415 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2011-10-16 21:49:24 EDT --- Correct the changelog: Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-MonadCatchIO-transformers/ghc-MonadCatchIO-transformers.spec Srpm: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-MonadCatchIO-transformers/ghc-MonadCatchIO-transformers-0.2.2.2-2.fc15.src.rpm (no actual packaging changes) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567086] Review Request: VXL - C++ Libraries for Computer Vision Research and Implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567086 --- Comment #33 from Richard Shaw 2011-10-16 21:48:48 EDT --- We'll have to wait and see if Mario posts new links after updating but I can probably take care of it! Richard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 662259] Review Request: git-annex - Manage files with git, without checking their contents in
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662259 --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen 2011-10-16 21:39:37 EDT --- As Wes mentioned, git-annex is now in hackage with more deps... I may try package it all unless someone else can help to do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 735717] Update Request: gnokii 0.6.30-1 - upgrade to new upstream version
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735717 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||gnokii-0.6.30-1.fc16 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-10-16 20:44:42 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-16 20:44:42 EDT --- gnokii-0.6.30-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 744944] Review Request: humanity-icon-theme - Humanity icon theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744944 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-16 20:31:22 EDT --- humanity-icon-theme-0.5.3.11-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697326] Review Request: libisoburn - Library to enable creation and expansion of ISO-9660 filesystems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697326 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-16 20:24:12 EDT --- libisoburn-1.1.6-1.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libisoburn-1.1.6-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 741995] Review Request: telepathy-rakia - SIP connection manager for Telepathy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741995 --- Comment #3 from nucleo 2011-10-16 20:08:51 EDT --- I think that should be "Obsoletes: telepathy-sofiasip <= 0.7.1-2" because with '<' telepathy-sofiasip-0.7.1-2 wouldn't be obsoleted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 687987] Review Request: plymouth-theme-hot-dog - Plymouth Happy Hot Dog Theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=687987 Christoph Wickert changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Christoph Wickert 2011-10-16 19:07:23 EDT --- Sorry, my bad. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: plymouth-theme-hot-dog Short Description: Plymouth Happy Hot Dog Theme Owners: wwoods Branches: f14 f15 f16 el6 InitialCC: cwickert -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697326] Review Request: libisoburn - Library to enable creation and expansion of ISO-9660 filesystems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697326 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-16 18:45:44 EDT --- libisoburn-1.1.6-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libisoburn-1.1.6-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705587] Review Request: android-tools - Android platform tools (adb, fastboot, etc)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705587 --- Comment #12 from Ivan Afonichev 2011-10-16 17:41:57 EDT --- Spec URL: https://github.com/vanaf/android-tools-fedora/blob/master/android-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://baldr.sgu.ru/rpm/android-tools-20110816.80d508f-3.fc15.src.rpm - Update udev rules (s/SYSFS/ATTR/g) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746368] Review Request: dnssec-nodes - DNS Visualization Tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746368
--- Comment #1 from Paul Wouters 2011-10-16 17:31:52 EDT
---
two issues found. Please fix
missing build dependancy: openssl-devel
It installs a file /usr/share/doc/COPYING. This is very generic
and should not be installed there, or use a specific name like
COPYING-dnssec-nodes.
Note an F-14 branch cannot be requested unless dnssec-tools-libs there
is bumped from 1.10 to 1.11.
MUST items:
* OK: Complies to package nameing guidlines
* OK: matches base package
* OK: Meets package guidelines
* OK: Valid license BSD matches source code
* OK: Written in Americanized engish as required (sadly)
* OK: COPYING packaged in %doc
* OK: spec file legible
* OK: source matches upstream source
* OK: package compiles and builds on main architecture
* FAIL: buildrequires missing openssl-devel and desktop-file-utils
* OK: no bad locale handling
* OK: no libraries, no ldconfig calls in post/postun
* OK: not relocatable
* OK: does not create or need to own directories
* OK: no duplicate files listed
* OK: Does not bundle other libraries
* OK: macro use consistent
* OK: package contains code or permissable content
* OK: no large document files
* OK: no header files in base package
* OK: no static libraries
* OK: no .so files in base package
* OK: no devel package dependancy issues
* OK: package does not contain .la files
* OK: gui dnssec-nodes.desktop properly installed with desktop-file-install
* FAIL: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages. Though this is not true, the file /usr/share/doc/COPYING is too
generic and could cause issues with other packages
* OK: filenames are valid UTF-8
SHOULD items:
* Packager should bug upstream about license file (packager IS upstreams,
go twist their rubber arm)
* No translation of description/summary in other languages available
* Reviewer tested build in mock and found missing BuildRequires
* no scriplets present
* no subpackages present
* no pkgconfig present
* no outside file dependancies
* WARN: missing man page for dnssec-nodes Encourage upstream to write one :)
Personal: I would use "install" or "cp" over %{_cp}
For your upstream hat:
for upstream:
* Add COPYING file (maintainer copied it in)
* make clean does not remove dnssec-nodes
* add man page for dnssec-nodes
* there is a bogus softlink stest -> /home/hardaker/tmp/h/somewhere
rpmlint:
dnssec-nodes.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libval -> lib val,
lib-val, Libava
dnssec-nodes.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libval -> lib val,
lib-val, Libava
dnssec-nodes.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dnssec-nodes
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705587] Review Request: android-tools - Android platform tools (adb, fastboot, etc)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705587
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Spura 2011-10-16
16:49:34 EDT ---
I tried to build it (and use it, but I'm not familiar with manually doing
something with android devices yet ;)) and this is now in my dmesg:
SYSFS{}= will be removed in a future udev version, please use ATTR{}= to match
the event device, or ATTRS{}= to match a parent device, in
/etc/udev/rules.d/51-android.rules
(Repeating several times ~20-30)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746368] Review Request: dnssec-nodes - DNS Visualization Tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746368 Paul Wouters changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||p...@xelerance.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746520] New: Review Request: findthatword - A word search maker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: findthatword - A word search maker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746520 Summary: Review Request: findthatword - A word search maker Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: l...@jcomserv.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- A word search maker for teachers, parents and those who enjoy creating puzzles. FindThatWord aims to be the best free wordsearch creation program available with useful features such as clues, hidden messages and automated page layout. SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/findthatword/findthatword-0.1-1.fc15.src.rpm SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/findthatword/findthatword.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 744944] Review Request: humanity-icon-theme - Humanity icon theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744944 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-16 15:26:16 EDT --- humanity-icon-theme-0.5.3.11-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/humanity-icon-theme-0.5.3.11-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737379] Review Request: drupal7-views - Provides a method for Drupal designers to control content presentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737379 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|drupal7-views-3.0-0.1.rc1.f |drupal7-views-3.0-0.1.rc1.e |c15 |l6 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-16 14:31:00 EDT --- drupal7-views-3.0-0.1.rc1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737379] Review Request: drupal7-views - Provides a method for Drupal designers to control content presentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737379 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|drupal7-views-3.0-0.1.rc1.e |drupal7-views-3.0-0.1.rc1.e |l6 |l5 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-16 14:31:09 EDT --- drupal7-views-3.0-0.1.rc1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 744944] Review Request: humanity-icon-theme - Humanity icon theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744944 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-16 14:23:24 EDT --- humanity-icon-theme-0.5.3.11-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/humanity-icon-theme-0.5.3.11-2.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 744944] Review Request: humanity-icon-theme - Humanity icon theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744944 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 741142] znc-infobot PackageReview - Infobot plugin for ZNC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741142 Nick Bebout changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|n...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #7 from Nick Bebout 2011-10-16 14:17:16 EDT --- Sorry Jon, I forgot to click that button. Fixed now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554464] Review Request: python-pebl - Python Environment for Bayesian Learning
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554464 --- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla 2011-10-16 12:47:08 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 741995] Review Request: telepathy-rakia - SIP connection manager for Telepathy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741995 --- Comment #2 from Brian Pepple 2011-10-16 14:01:01 EDT --- This package rename is only for the F16 & Rawhide branches. It will not be applied to the F15 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 741995] Review Request: telepathy-rakia - SIP connection manager for Telepathy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741995 Michael Scherer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@zarb.org --- Comment #1 from Michael Scherer 2011-10-16 13:59:14 EDT --- It doesn't build in mock with f15 either : $ mock --rebuild telepathy-rakia-0.7.2-1.fc15.src.rpm INFO: mock.py version 1.1.12 starting... State Changed: init plugins INFO: selinux disabled State Changed: start INFO: Start(telepathy-rakia-0.7.2-1.fc15.src.rpm) Config(fedora-15-x86_64) State Changed: lock buildroot State Changed: clean INFO: chroot (/var/lib/mock/fedora-15-x86_64) unlocked and deleted State Changed: unlock buildroot State Changed: init State Changed: lock buildroot Mock Version: 1.1.12 INFO: Mock Version: 1.1.12 INFO: enabled root cache State Changed: unpacking root cache INFO: enabled yum cache State Changed: cleaning yum metadata INFO: enabled ccache State Changed: running yum State Changed: unlock buildroot State Changed: setup ERROR: Exception(telepathy-rakia-0.7.2-1.fc15.src.rpm) Config(fedora-15-x86_64) 0 minutes 19 seconds INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/fedora-15-x86_64/result ERROR: Command failed: # ['/usr/bin/yum-builddep', '--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/fedora-15-x86_64/root/', '/var/lib/mock/fedora-15-x86_64/root///builddir/build/SRPMS/telepathy-rakia-0.7.2-1.fc15.src.rpm'] Getting requirements for telepathy-rakia-0.7.2-1.fc15.src --> 1:dbus-devel-1.4.6-5.fc15.x86_64 --> dbus-glib-devel-0.92-2.fc15.x86_64 --> telepathy-glib-devel-0.14.10-1.fc15.x86_64 Error: Aucun paquet trouvé pour sofia-sip-glib-devel >= 1.12.11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 687987] Review Request: plymouth-theme-hot-dog - Plymouth Happy Hot Dog Theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=687987 --- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla 2011-10-16 12:47:52 EDT --- Please include a description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690360] Review Request: weave - Firefox Registration/Sync Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690360 Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m3fr...@thesandhufamily.ca --- Comment #11 from Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu 2011-10-16 12:55:23 EDT --- Bug info says it's not assigned to anyone. Does that mean there's no one working on the RPM or there's no one reviewing the submitted package? If the original submitter has abandoned the effort, I will consider taking it over. My RPM building skills aren't the greatest. I'll give it my best. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 456750] Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456750 --- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla 2011-10-16 12:46:42 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 530473] Review Request: lessfs - Lessfs is an inline data deduplicating filesystem.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530473 --- Comment #45 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2011-10-16 12:35:50 EDT --- Chris, if you willing maintain it in Fedora - feel free to open new review request! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 662340] Review Request: olsrd - adhoc wireless mesh routing daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662340 Michael Scherer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@zarb.org --- Comment #4 from Michael Scherer 2011-10-16 13:30:53 EDT --- The url no longer work : $ LC_ALL=C wget http://compcube.dyndns-server.com/olsrd-0.6.1-1.fc14.src.rpm --2011-10-16 19:29:58-- http://compcube.dyndns-server.com/olsrd-0.6.1-1.fc14.src.rpm Resolving compcube.dyndns-server.com... 192.168.100.10 Connecting to compcube.dyndns-server.com|192.168.100.10|:80... ^ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 744944] Review Request: humanity-icon-theme - Humanity icon theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744944 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla 2011-10-16 12:48:59 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 713334] Review Request: profdepanne - help desk for user
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713334 Thomas Spura changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 713334] Review Request: profdepanne - help desk for user
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713334 --- Comment #2 from patr_...@yahoo.fr 2011-10-16 10:08:06 EDT --- Thanks for your interest about ProfDepanne. I'm not a Fedora packager, I'm developping ProfDepanne on my free time. It's the first package I've done. I know that Mageia is doing a package for it. I appreciate some help please ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670915] Review Request: aprsg - Amateur Radio APRS Gateway
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670915 --- Comment #3 from Mario Blättermann 2011-10-16 09:49:04 EDT --- Any news about this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 636930] Review Request:projectcenter - The GNUstep IDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636930 --- Comment #8 from Mario Blättermann 2011-10-16 08:56:24 EDT --- Still any interest to keep this review request alive? If not, the report should be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 744944] Review Request: humanity-icon-theme - Humanity icon theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744944 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Mohamed El Morabity 2011-10-16 08:55:05 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: humanity-icon-theme Short Description: Humanity icon theme Owners: melmorabity Branches: f15 f16 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 744944] Review Request: humanity-icon-theme - Humanity icon theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744944 --- Comment #7 from Mohamed El Morabity 2011-10-16 08:53:43 EDT --- Thank you for the review. Thanks also for the bug report ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 616935] Review Request: gworkspace - The official GNUstep workspace manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616935 --- Comment #7 from Mario Blättermann 2011-10-16 08:53:41 EDT --- Still any interest to keep this review request alive? If not, the report should be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 744948] Review Request: monochrome-icon-theme - Ubuntu Mono icon theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744948 Mario Blättermann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mari...@freenet.de Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |ubuntu-mono-icon-theme -|monochrome-icon-theme - |Ubuntu Mono icon theme |Ubuntu Mono icon theme -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 744944] Review Request: humanity-icon-theme - Humanity icon theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744944
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mari...@freenet.de
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Mario Blättermann 2011-10-16 08:48:00
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I'm just following this page:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#When_Upstream_uses_Prohibited_Code
> I can't embed the original tarball in the source RPM because it contains
> nonfree items (Ubuntu logo is copyrighted).
OK, I didn't know about that.
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license.
GPLv2
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[.] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must
be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[.] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source.
Due to that the original tarball needs to be re-packed to remove
copyrighted
files, it is impossible to verify the checksums. The bzip2 stack doesn't
work always identically.
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
- Succesful Koji build available.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, ...
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
[+] MUST: If a package installs files below %{_datadir}/icons, the icon cache
must be updated.
[.] MUST: Packages storing shared library files (not just symlinks) must call
ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ...
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in %files.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+] MUST: Packages must not provide RPM dependency information when that
information is not global in nature, or are otherwise handled.
[.] MUST: When filtering automatically generated RPM dependency information,
the filtering system implemented by Fedora must be used.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application.
[.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[.] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), ...
[.] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
[.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file
[.] MUST: .desktop files must be properly installed with desktop-file-install
in the %install section.
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[.] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream...
[+] SHOULD: Timestamps of files should be preserved.
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
See Koji build above (which uses mock anyway)
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described.
Tested in F15. Works as expected.
[+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.
[.] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency.
[.] SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg.
[.] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin,
/usr/bin, or /usr/sbin ...
[.] SHOULD: Your package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts.
PACKAGE APPROVED
Here's the bug report for the wrong FSF address:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/humanity/+bug/875695
--
Configure bugmail:
[Bug 693664] Review Request: supybot-gribble - Cross-platform support bot based on supybot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693664 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-16 08:34:42 EDT --- supybot-gribble-0.83.4.1-10.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/supybot-gribble-0.83.4.1-10.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 713334] Review Request: profdepanne - help desk for user
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713334
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mari...@freenet.de
--- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann 2011-10-16 08:02:17
EDT ---
Your spec file has to be written in American English, especially the changelog.
If you want to provide some parts in French, please use the following
additionally:
Summary(fr):Programme d'aide aux utilisateurs.
%description -l fr
Ce programme permet d'aider les utilisateurs de l'informatique à se dépanner
seul. C'est également un guide de migration vers GNU/Linux qui vous aidera Ã
installer et utiliser un système libre.
Use a line wrap at 80 characters for the description to make it better
readable.
The %define on top are not needed. Just write:
Name: profdepanne
Version:2.6
Release:1%{?dist}
It's not needed to define a "Prefix:".
If you call desktop-file-utils in BuildRequires, you have also to apply the
appropriate mechanism to install and verify your *.desktop file, see
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage.
Your package lacks of documentation. As the author of the upstream application,
you should provide at least a README file in *English*. It's annoying for the
users to have all in French. Additionally, you have to provide a license
declaration in your package.
By the way, are you already a packager for Fedora? Or is this your first
package and you need a sponsor?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 744725] Review Request: opus - An audio codec for use in low-delay speech and audio communication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744725
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||mari...@freenet.de
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mari...@freenet.de
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann 2011-10-16 06:49:49
EDT ---
$ rpmlint -i -v *
opus.i686: I: checking
opus.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code, codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
opus.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code, codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
opus.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Org's -> Erg's, Ora's, Orr's
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
opus.i686: I: checking-url http://www.opus-codec.org/ (timeout 10 seconds)
opus.src: I: checking
opus.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code, codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
opus.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code, codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
opus.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Org's -> Erg's, Ora's, Orr's
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
opus.src: I: checking-url http://www.opus-codec.org/ (timeout 10 seconds)
opus.src: I: checking-url http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-codec-opus-08.txt
(timeout 10 seconds)
opus.src: I: checking-url
http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/opus/opus-0.9.6.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds)
opus.x86_64: I: checking
opus.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code, codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
opus.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code,
codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
opus.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Org's -> Erg's, Ora's,
Orr's
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
opus.x86_64: I: checking-url http://www.opus-codec.org/ (timeout 10 seconds)
opus-debuginfo.i686: I: checking
opus-debuginfo.i686: I: checking-url http://www.opus-codec.org/ (timeout 10
seconds)
opus-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking
opus-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking-url http://www.opus-codec.org/ (timeout 10
seconds)
opus-devel.i686: I: checking
opus-devel.i686: I: checking-url http://www.opus-codec.org/ (timeout 10
seconds)
opus-devel.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
opus-devel.x86_64: I: checking
opus-devel.x86_64: I: checking-url http://www.opus-codec.org/ (timeout 10
seconds)
opus-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
opus.spec: I: checking-url
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-codec-opus-08.txt (timeout 10 seconds)
opus.spec: I: checking-url
http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/opus/opus-0.9.6.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds)
7 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 11 warnings.
Some ignorable spelling errors, and "missing docs" from the -devel package.
It's odd that this is a warning. The base package ships the appropriate docs
anyway.
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license.
BSD
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[.] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must
be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source.
$ md5sum *
030556bcaebb241505f8577e92abe6d4 opus-0.9.6.tar.gz
030556bcaebb241505f8577e92abe6d4 opus-0.9.6.tar.gz.packaged
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
- Succesful Koji build available.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, ...
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
[.] MUST: If a package installs files
[Bug 746215] Review Request: perl-RT-Authen-ExternalAuth - RT Authentication using External Sources
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746215
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||mari...@freenet.de
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mari...@freenet.de
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Mario Blättermann 2011-10-16 06:06:36
EDT ---
$ rpmlint -i -v *
perl-RT-Authen-ExternalAuth.src: I: checking
perl-RT-Authen-ExternalAuth.src: I: checking-url
http://search.cpan.org/dist/RT-Authen-ExternalAuth/ (timeout 10 seconds)
perl-RT-Authen-ExternalAuth.src: I: checking-url
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/F/FA/FALCONE/RT-Authen-ExternalAuth-0.09.tar.gz
(timeout 10 seconds)
perl-RT-Authen-ExternalAuth.noarch: I: checking
perl-RT-Authen-ExternalAuth.noarch: I: checking-url
http://search.cpan.org/dist/RT-Authen-ExternalAuth/ (timeout 10 seconds)
perl-RT-Authen-ExternalAuth.spec: I: checking-url
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/F/FA/FALCONE/RT-Authen-ExternalAuth-0.09.tar.gz
(timeout 10 seconds)
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
No issues.
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[X] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license.
GPLv2
[X] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
According to the README file, the license is GPLv2. There's no hint about
re-licensing under newer GPL versions.
[.] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must
be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source.
$ md5sum *
3089dbad24538fd51492bb881062219d RT-Authen-ExternalAuth-0.09.tar.gz
3089dbad24538fd51492bb881062219d
RT-Authen-ExternalAuth-0.09.tar.gz.packaged
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
- Succesful Koji build available.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, ...
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
[.] MUST: If a package installs files below %{_datadir}/icons, the icon cache
must be updated.
[.] MUST: Packages storing shared library files (not just symlinks) must call
ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ...
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in %files.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+] MUST: Packages must not provide RPM dependency information when that
information is not global in nature, or are otherwise handled.
[.] MUST: When filtering automatically generated RPM dependency information,
the filtering system implemented by Fedora must be used.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application.
[.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[.] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), ...
[.] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
[.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file
[.] MUST: .desktop files must be properly installed with desktop-file-install
in the %install section.
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[.] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream...
[+] SHOULD: Timestamps of files should be preserved.
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
See Koji build above (which uses mock anyway)
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described.
I assume the packager has tested it. Don't kno
[Bug 687987] Review Request: plymouth-theme-hot-dog - Plymouth Happy Hot Dog Theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=687987 Christoph Wickert changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Christoph Wickert 2011-10-16 03:36:16 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: plymouth-theme-hot-dog Short Description: Owners: wwoods Branches: f14 f15 f16 el6 InitialCC: cwickert -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
