[Bug 730233] Review Request: jboss-jaxrpc-1.1-api - Java API for XML-Based RPC (JAX-RPC) 1.1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730233 Tomas Radej changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||tra...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|tra...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Tomas Radej 2011-10-20 04:32:46 EDT --- Taking this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 727155] Review Request: rubygem-fast_gettext - A simple, fast, memory-efficient and threadsafe implementation of GetText
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727155 --- Comment #3 from Bohuslav Kabrda 2011-10-20 04:34:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > * Licensing: The mentioned files in lib/vendor directory are not Ruby or > > GPLv2+, but Ruby or LGPLv2+ -- see > > https://github.com/mutoh/gettext/blob/master/README.rdoc (the library, where > > the files are from). > > The file you are referring says: "This program is licenced under the same > licence as Ruby", i.e. GPLv2 or Ruby => I am going to remove the "+", with the > exception of 'setup.rb' file which is not present in the folder. So it is not > LGPLv2+ IMO. > I was refering to "... same licence as Ruby(See COPYING) or LGPL ...". So the whole license tag should be something like License: Public Domain and ((GPLv2+ or Ruby) or LGPLv2+) > > * It would be good to query upstream not to bundle the gettext library, but > > use > > it as a separate dependency. > > I have checked the files once more. Although the files are coming from gettext > library, it seems that they are more or less modified. Moreover, the original > gettext package seems to be death, so it makes no sense IMO. > I agree that the modifications made to files from gettext are non-trivial and that gettext is more or less dead. So it is not a problem for this package. > > * I would consider moving readme.md into the main package, as it contains > > information about licensing, which I think should be present in the main > > package. > > DONE. > > > Otherwise, the package seems to be ok, but I would like to get the three > > points > > above clear. > > > Please note that I have also updated the package to the latest upstream > version. > > Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-fast_gettext.spec > SRPM URL: > http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-fast_gettext-0.6.1-1.fcf17.src.rpm > > Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3443784 Before this package is approved, I would certainly like to make the License clear, otherwise everything is ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746754] Review request: PDFCrack - A Password Recovery Tool for PDF-files.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746754 Prasad J Pandit changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pra...@redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Prasad J Pandit 2011-10-20 04:55:32 EDT --- Please see: SPEC: http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools/pdfcrack.spec SRPM: http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools/pdfcrack-0.11-4.fc14.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3446368 I'm not sure about the empty-debuginfo package though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 727155] Review Request: rubygem-fast_gettext - A simple, fast, memory-efficient and threadsafe implementation of GetText
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727155 --- Comment #4 from Vít Ondruch 2011-10-20 05:37:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > I was refering to "... same licence as Ruby(See COPYING) or LGPL ...". So the > whole license tag should be something like Please could you be more specific? The only reference to LGPL is in file "usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/fast_gettext-0.6.1/lib/fast_gettext/vendor/README.rdoc" on line 155. This refers to file which is not included in the gem an will never be. Am I missing something? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 732214] Review Request: otf2bdf - Generate BDF bitmap fonts from OpenType outline fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732214 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|otf2bdf-3.1-2.fc16 |otf2bdf-3.1-2.fc15 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-20 05:55:51 EDT --- otf2bdf-3.1-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 732214] Review Request: otf2bdf - Generate BDF bitmap fonts from OpenType outline fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732214 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|otf2bdf-3.1-2.fc15 |otf2bdf-3.1-2.fc14 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-20 05:56:44 EDT --- otf2bdf-3.1-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666726] Review Request: amide - A Medical Image Data Examiner:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|amide-1.0.0-1.fc16 |amide-1.0.0-1.fc15 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-20 05:56:22 EDT --- amide-1.0.0-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666726] Review Request: amide - A Medical Image Data Examiner:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|amide-1.0.0-1.fc15 |amide-1.0.0-1.fc14 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-20 06:00:01 EDT --- amide-1.0.0-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 727155] Review Request: rubygem-fast_gettext - A simple, fast, memory-efficient and threadsafe implementation of GetText
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727155 Bohuslav Kabrda changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Bohuslav Kabrda 2011-10-20 06:31:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > I was refering to "... same licence as Ruby(See COPYING) or LGPL ...". So > > the > > whole license tag should be something like > > Please could you be more specific? The only reference to LGPL is in file > "usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/fast_gettext-0.6.1/lib/fast_gettext/vendor/README.rdoc" > on line 155. This refers to file which is not included in the gem an will > never > be. Am I missing something? Sorry, my mistake. I was looking at a newer license of the forked gettext library. The version that was forked was licensed under Ruby at the time, so your License field is OK. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 727155] Review Request: rubygem-fast_gettext - A simple, fast, memory-efficient and threadsafe implementation of GetText
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727155 Vít Ondruch changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Vít Ondruch 2011-10-20 06:42:27 EDT --- Thank you for your review! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: rubygem-fast_gettext Short Description: A simple, fast, memory-efficient and threadsafe implementation of GetText Owners: vondruch Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730233] Review Request: jboss-jaxrpc-1.1-api - Java API for XML-Based RPC (JAX-RPC) 1.1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730233 Tomas Radej changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730233] Review Request: jboss-jaxrpc-1.1-api - Java API for XML-Based RPC (JAX-RPC) 1.1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730233
--- Comment #2 from Tomas Radej 2011-10-20 07:42:05 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Rpmlint output:
jboss-jaxrpc-1.1-api.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0.1-1
['1.0.0-1.fc17', '1.0.0-1']
jboss-jaxrpc-1.1-api.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.jboss.org/ HTTP
Error 403: Forbidden
jboss-jaxrpc-1.1-api.noarch: W: no-documentation
jboss-jaxrpc-1.1-api.src: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.jboss.org/ HTTP Error
403: Forbidden
jboss-jaxrpc-1.1-api.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
jboss-jaxrpc-api_1.1_spec-1.0.0.Final-src-svn.tar.gz
jboss-jaxrpc-1.1-api-javadoc.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Javadocs
-> Java docs, Java-docs, Avocados
jboss-jaxrpc-1.1-api-javadoc.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.jboss.org/
HTTP Error 403: Forbidden
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings.
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1].
[x] Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms. <<
jboss-servlet- needs to be present
[x] Buildroot definition is not present
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines[3,4].
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type:
[-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for
the
package is included in %doc.
[x] All independent sub-packages have license of their own
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5].
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] File sections do not contain %defattr(-,root,root,-) unless changed with
good reason
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore)
[x] Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
mixing)
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x] Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[!] Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks)
<< Folder copied is apidocs, should be apidocs/*
[x] Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[x] Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
[x] Package uses %global not %define
[x] If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that
tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...)
[-] If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be
removed prior to building
[x] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[x] Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (see [6] for details)
[-] If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when
building with ant
[x] pom files has correct add_maven_depmap
=== Maven ===
[x] Use %{_mavenpomdir} macro for placing pom files instead of
%{_datadir}/maven2/poms
[-] If package uses "-Dmaven.test.skip=true" explain why it was needed in a
comment
[-] If package uses custom depmap "-Dmaven.local.depmap.file=*" explain why
it's needed in a comment
[x] Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x] Packages DOES NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on
jpackage-utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
=== Other suggestions ===
[x] If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac)
[x] Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary
[x] Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible)
[x] Latest version is packaged.
*** ISSUES ***
- Folder copied in Javadoc is apidocs, should be apidocs/*
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedo
[Bug 727155] Review Request: rubygem-fast_gettext - A simple, fast, memory-efficient and threadsafe implementation of GetText
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727155 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2011-10-20 08:10:15 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 738590] Review request: rubygem-gettext_i18n_rails - Simple FastGettext Rails integration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738590 Bug 738590 depends on bug 727155, which changed state. Bug 727155 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-fast_gettext - A simple, fast, memory-efficient and threadsafe implementation of GetText https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727155 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 727155] Review Request: rubygem-fast_gettext - A simple, fast, memory-efficient and threadsafe implementation of GetText
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727155 Vít Ondruch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-10-20 08:59:49 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747610] New: Review Request: timeline - Displays and navigates events on a timeline
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: timeline - Displays and navigates events on a timeline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747610 Summary: Review Request: timeline - Displays and navigates events on a timeline Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: l...@jcomserv.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Timeline is a cross-platform application for displaying and navigating events on a timeline. SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/timeline/timeline.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/timeline/timeline-0.14.0-1.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747051] Review Request: transmission-remote-gtk - GTK remote control for the Transmission BitTorrent client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747051 Arun SAG changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||saga...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|saga...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747659] New: Reivew Request: proxool - Java connection pool library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Reivew Request: proxool - Java connection pool library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747659 Summary: Reivew Request: proxool - Java connection pool library Product: Fedora Version: 16 Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: agr...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Summary: Java connection pool library Name:proxool Version: 0.9.1 License: BSD URL: http://proxool.sourceforge.net/ Description: Transparently adds connection pooling to your existing JDBC driver. Complies with the J2SE API, giving you the confidence to develop to standards. You can monitor the performance of your database connections and listen to connection events. It's easy to configure using the JDBC API, XML, or Java property files - you decide. SPEC: http://downloads.eucalyptus.com/software/devel/fedora-16/SPECS/proxool.spec SRPM: http://downloads.eucalyptus.com/software/devel/fedora-16/SRPMS/proxool-0.9.1-3.fc16.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747659] Review Request: proxool - Java connection pool library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747659 Andy Grimm changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Reivew Request: proxool - |Review Request: proxool - |Java connection pool|Java connection pool |library |library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747659] Reivew Request: proxool - Java connection pool library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747659 Andy Grimm changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183(FE-JAVASIG) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747674] New: Review Request: perl-ZeroMQ - ZeroMQ2 wrapper for Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-ZeroMQ - ZeroMQ2 wrapper for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747674 Summary: Review Request: perl-ZeroMQ - ZeroMQ2 wrapper for Perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j...@di.uminho.pt QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://um-pe09-2.di.uminho.pt/fedora/perl-ZeroMQ.spec SRPM URL: http://um-pe09-2.di.uminho.pt/fedora/perl-ZeroMQ-0.17-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: The ZeroMQ module is a wrapper of the 0MQ message passing library for Perl. It's a thin wrapper around the C API. Please read http://zeromq.org for more details on ZeroMQ. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747765] New: Review Request: apache-log4j-extras - Apache Extras Companion™ for Apache log4j™
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: apache-log4j-extras - Apache Extras Companion™ for Apache log4j™ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747765 Summary: Review Request: apache-log4j-extras - Apache Extras Companion™ for Apache log4j™ Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: da...@gnsa.us QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/apache-log4j-extras.spec SRPM URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/apache-log4j-extras-1.1-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Apache Extras Companion™ for Apache log4j™ is a collection of appenders, filters, and layouts for Apache log4j 1.2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663956] Review Request: python-numexpr - Fast numerical array expression evaluator for Python and NumPy.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663956 --- Comment #9 from Thibault North 2011-10-20 21:11:19 EDT --- Let's try and finish with that review now. New release, new spec: http://tnorth.fedorapeople.org/python-numexpr.spec SRPM: http://tnorth.fedorapeople.org/ rpmlint -v output: python-numexpr.src: I: checking python-numexpr.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US runtime -> run time, run-time, runtish python-numexpr.src: I: checking-url http://numexpr.googlecode.com/ (timeout 10 seconds) python-numexpr.src: I: checking-url http://numexpr.googlecode.com/files/numexpr-1.4.2.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) python-numexpr.x86_64: I: checking python-numexpr.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US runtime -> run time, run-time, runtish python-numexpr.x86_64: I: checking-url http://numexpr.googlecode.com/ (timeout 10 seconds) python-numexpr-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking python-numexpr-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking-url http://numexpr.googlecode.com/ (timeout 10 seconds) 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747765] Review Request: apache-log4j-extras - Apache Extras Companion™ for Apache log4j™
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747765 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-10-20 21:15:18 EDT --- Please do read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Trademarks_in_Summary_or_Description -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747765] Review Request: apache-log4j-extras - Apache Extras Companion for Apache log4j
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747765 David Nalley changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |apache-log4j-extras - |apache-log4j-extras - |Apache Extras Companion™|Apache Extras Companion for |for Apache log4j™ |Apache log4j --- Comment #2 from David Nalley 2011-10-20 23:20:15 EDT --- bah - I know better. Thanks tibbs. Spec URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/apache-log4j-extras.spec SRPM URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/apache-log4j-extras-1.1-2.fc15.src.rpm Description: Apache Extras Companion for Apache log4j is a collection of appenders, filters, and layouts for Apache log4j 1.2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746754] Review request: PDFCrack - A Password Recovery Tool for PDF-files.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746754 --- Comment #8 from Rahul Sundaram 2011-10-20 23:51:57 EDT --- Can post to devel list if you cant figure out why. Fix that debuginfo issue and I can approve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 741824] Review Request: libpinyin - Library to deal with pinyin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741824 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-21 00:35:43 EDT --- libpinyin-0.2.99.2-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libpinyin-0.2.99.2-1.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 741824] Review Request: libpinyin - Library to deal with pinyin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741824 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 741824] Review Request: libpinyin - Library to deal with pinyin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741824 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-21 00:35:35 EDT --- libpinyin-0.2.99.2-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libpinyin-0.2.99.2-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747834] New: Review Request: perl-JSON-Path - Search nested hashref/arrayref structures using JSONPath
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON-Path - Search nested hashref/arrayref structures using JSONPath https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747834 Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON-Path - Search nested hashref/arrayref structures using JSONPath Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: boche...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-JSON-Path.spec SRPM URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-JSON-Path-0.101-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: This module implements JSONPath, an XPath-like language for searching JSON- like structures. $ rpmlint perl-JSON-Path* perl-JSON-Path.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) hashref -> hash ref, hash-ref, hashish perl-JSON-Path.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) arrayref -> array ref, array-ref, array perl-JSON-Path.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) hashref -> hash ref, hash-ref, hashish perl-JSON-Path.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) arrayref -> array ref, array-ref, array 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745233] Review Request: python-logbook - A logging replacement for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745233 Robin Lee changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|robinlee.s...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747849] New: Review Request: e00compr - Library to compress and uncompress E00 files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: e00compr - Library to compress and uncompress E00 files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747849 Summary: Review Request: e00compr - Library to compress and uncompress E00 files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: volke...@gmx.at QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://www.geofrogger.net/review/e00compr.spec SRPM URL: http://www.geofrogger.net/review/e00compr-1.0.1-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: ANSI-C library to compress and uncompress Arc/Info Export (E00) files. [makerpm@lenovo e00compr]$ rpmlint /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SRPMS/e00compr-1.0.1-1.fc15.src.rpm ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/e00compr-* e00compr.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) uncompress -> uncompressed, compression, compressor e00compr.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US uncompress -> uncompressed, compression, compressor e00compr.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) uncompress -> uncompressed, compression, compressor e00compr.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US uncompress -> uncompressed, compression, compressor 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3448757 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747849] Review Request: e00compr - Library to compress and uncompress E00 files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747849 Volker Fröhlich changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||737401 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737401] Review Request: saga - Geographic information system with an API for processing geodata
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737401 Volker Fröhlich changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||747849 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
