[Bug 750139] Review Request: lv2-mdala-plugins - LV2 port of the MDA VST plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750139
--- Comment #4 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com 2011-11-24
03:08:16 EST ---
Hi Jerry, thanks for the review!
I've removed the README form the encoding fix and dropped the buildroot tag.
RPM_OPT_FLAGS and %{optflags} are interchangeable [1]
From what I know the waf is not so concerned with backwards compatibility as
other build tools (such as cmake) and recommends shipping the waf script. There
are no clear guidelines on this - the version of waf used here is actually
earlier than the one in f16, so I will leave as is.
I have contacted the author with regards to the incorrect license file, stay
tuned.
thanks
Brendan
[1]
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705372] Review Request: perl-Unicode-LineBreak - UAX #14 Unicode Line Breaking Algorithm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705372 --- Comment #16 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2011-11-24 03:45:04 EST --- Thanks again for the review Emmanuel. This was a though but interesting one :-) New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Unicode-LineBreak Short Description: UAX #14 Unicode Line Breaking Algorithm Owners: xavierb Branches: f15 f16 el5 el6 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705372] Review Request: perl-Unicode-LineBreak - UAX #14 Unicode Line Breaking Algorithm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705372 Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705372] Review Request: perl-Unicode-LineBreak - UAX #14 Unicode Line Breaking Algorithm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705372 --- Comment #17 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-11-24 04:39:11 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Unicode-LineBreak Short Description: UAX #14 Unicode Line Breaking Algorithm Owners: ppisar mmaslano psabata Branches: InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705372] Review Request: perl-Unicode-LineBreak - UAX #14 Unicode Line Breaking Algorithm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705372 --- Comment #19 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2011-11-24 04:42:51 EST --- Petr, do you want to co-maintain some or all of the branches ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705372] Review Request: perl-Unicode-LineBreak - UAX #14 Unicode Line Breaking Algorithm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705372 --- Comment #18 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-11-24 04:40:37 EST --- (In reply to comment #17) New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Unicode-LineBreak Short Description: UAX #14 Unicode Line Breaking Algorithm Owners: ppisar mmaslano psabata Branches: InitialCC: perl-sig Oops. Ignore it. I thought this is my package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705372] Review Request: perl-Unicode-LineBreak - UAX #14 Unicode Line Breaking Algorithm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705372 --- Comment #20 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-11-24 04:45:46 EST --- No, thanks, I have a lot of my packages already. Actually I think this comment sequence could confuse SCM tools. Maybe you should append your original SCM request again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 756479] Review Request: perl-Socket - C socket.h defines and structure manipulators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756479 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705372] Review Request: perl-Unicode-LineBreak - UAX #14 Unicode Line Breaking Algorithm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705372 --- Comment #21 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2011-11-24 04:56:32 EST --- (In reply to comment #20) No, thanks, I have a lot of my packages already. Actually I think this comment sequence could confuse SCM tools. Maybe you should append your original SCM request again. Yup, that what I was going to do but was waiting for your answer first. Thanks for the quick reply. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705372] Review Request: perl-Unicode-LineBreak - UAX #14 Unicode Line Breaking Algorithm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705372 --- Comment #22 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2011-11-24 04:56:45 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Unicode-LineBreak Short Description: UAX #14 Unicode Line Breaking Algorithm Owners: xavierb Branches: f15 f16 el5 el6 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 754749] Review Request: perl-Glib-Object-Introspection - Dynamically create Perl language bindings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754749 Daniel Berrange berra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Daniel Berrange berra...@redhat.com 2011-11-24 05:04:56 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Glib-Object-Introspection Short Description: Dynamically create Perl language bindings Owners: berrange Branches: f15 f16 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 756636] Review Request: gnome-screenshot - A screenshot utility for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756636
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||panem...@gmail.com
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com
Summary|gnome-screenshot - A|Review Request:
|screenshot utility for |gnome-screenshot - A
|GNOME |screenshot utility for
||GNOME
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2011-11-24 05:16:59 EST
---
Review:-
+ koji scratch build
-http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3537183
+ rpmlint on rpms gave
gnome-screenshot.src:35: W: macro-in-comment %{_datadir}
gnome-screenshot.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided gnome-utils
gnome-screenshot.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/gnome-screenshot-3.3.1/COPYING
gnome-screenshot.x86_64: E: invalid-desktopfile
/usr/share/applications/gnome-screenshot.desktop file contains group Screen
Shortcut Group, but groups extending the format should start with X-
gnome-screenshot.x86_64: E: invalid-desktopfile
/usr/share/applications/gnome-screenshot.desktop file contains group Window
Shortcut Group, but groups extending the format should start with X-
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 2 warnings.
+ source verified with upstream as (sha1sum)
734ecd3ee4f2ccbd463754ec5b28b54fcd54c4c3 gnome-screenshot-3.3.1.tar.xz
734ecd3ee4f2ccbd463754ec5b28b54fcd54c4c3
../SOURCES/gnome-screenshot-3.3.1.tar.xz
+ follows packaging guidelines.
Suggestions:
1) you can fix the macro-in-comment rpmlint warning using %% instead of %
2) also you can ask upstream to update fsf address.
3) Has the desktop issue already reported in upstream?
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736262] Review Request: proxyfuzz - man-in-the-middle non-deterministic network fuzzer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736262 Petr Sklenar pskle...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(mno...@redhat.com ||) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736262] Review Request: proxyfuzz - man-in-the-middle non-deterministic network fuzzer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736262 Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(mno...@redhat.com | |), | |needinfo?(mno...@redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #5 from Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com 2011-11-24 06:27:28 EST --- The new spec looks good to me. However, when I built it under mock f-16-x86_64 the resulted RPMSs could not be installed due to some noarch/arch problem. Could you build that SRPM under Mock and let me know how it went? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736262] Review Request: proxyfuzz - man-in-the-middle non-deterministic network fuzzer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736262 Petr Sklenar pskle...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(mno...@redhat.com ||) --- Comment #6 from Petr Sklenar pskle...@redhat.com 2011-11-24 07:02:31 EST --- hmm for me it goes OK: [makerpm@masox ~]$ mock -r fedora-16-x86_64 ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/proxyfuzz-0.1-20110923.fc14.src.rpm INFO: mock.py version 1.1.16 starting... State Changed: init plugins INFO: selinux enabled State Changed: start INFO: Start(/home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SRPMS/proxyfuzz-0.1-20110923.fc14.src.rpm) Config(fedora-16-x86_64) State Changed: lock buildroot State Changed: clean State Changed: unlock buildroot State Changed: init State Changed: lock buildroot Mock Version: 1.1.16 INFO: Mock Version: 1.1.16 INFO: calling preinit hooks INFO: enabled root cache INFO: enabled yum cache State Changed: cleaning yum metadata INFO: enabled ccache State Changed: running yum State Changed: creating cache State Changed: unlock buildroot State Changed: setup State Changed: build INFO: Done(/home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SRPMS/proxyfuzz-0.1-20110923.fc14.src.rpm) Config(fedora-16-x86_64) 2 minutes 33 seconds INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/fedora-16-x86_64/result State Changed: end results: http://people.redhat.com/psklenar/pub/proxyfuzz/mock-result/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701801] Review Request: ast - A Library for Handling World Coordinate Systems in Astronomy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701801 Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(sergio.pasra@gmai | |l.com) | --- Comment #4 from Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com 2011-11-24 07:15:44 EST --- I would like to do the review this weekend... I've been very busy these months -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719958] Review Request: rubygem-rack-cache - HTTP Caching for Rack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719958 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 07:35:31 EST --- Okay. I will try to look at this bug this weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 756479] Review Request: perl-Socket - C socket.h defines and structure manipulators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756479
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com 2011-11-24 07:51:25 EST ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
C/C++
[!]: MUST Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: perl-Socket-1.94.07-1.fc17.i686.rpm :
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/Socket/Socket.so
Generic
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one supported architecture.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Buildroot is not present
Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL is required
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[-]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[-]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: MUST Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generates any conflict.
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
rpmlint perl-Socket-1.94.07-1.fc17.src.rpm
perl-Socket.src: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint perl-Socket-debuginfo-1.94.07-1.fc17.i686.rpm
perl-Socket-debuginfo.i686: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint perl-Socket-1.94.07-1.fc17.i686.rpm
perl-Socket.i686: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
/home/contyk/src/review/756479/Socket-1.94_07.tar.gz :
MD5SUM this package : d650dfc88ea66abc3cb49a32d52f81d0
MD5SUM upstream package : d650dfc88ea66abc3cb49a32d52f81d0
[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[-]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
/usr/sbin.
[x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
--requires).
[?]: SHOULD Package functions as described.
[-]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from
upstream.
[x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL.
[-]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages,
[Bug 756479] Review Request: perl-Socket - C socket.h defines and structure manipulators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756479 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 756479] Review Request: perl-Socket - C socket.h defines and structure manipulators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756479 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-11-24 08:22:10 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Socket Short Description: C socket.h defines and structure manipulators Owners: ppisar mmaslano psabata Branches: InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 756772] New: Review Request: libosinfo - A library for managing OS information for virtualization
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libosinfo - A library for managing OS information for virtualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756772 Summary: Review Request: libosinfo - A library for managing OS information for virtualization Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: berra...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://berrange.fedorapeople.org/review/libosinfo/libosinfo.spec SRPM URL: http://berrange.fedorapeople.org/review/libosinfo/libosinfo-0.0.2-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: libosinfo is a library that allows virtualization provisioning tools to determine the optimal device settings for a hypervisor/operating system combination. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 756776] New: Review Request: mingw32-libosinfo - MinGW Windows libvirt virtualization library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libosinfo - MinGW Windows libvirt virtualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756776 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libosinfo - MinGW Windows libvirt virtualization library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: berra...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://berrange.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw32-libosinfo/mingw32-libosinfo.spec SRPM URL: http://berrange.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw32-libosinfo/mingw32-libosinfo-0.0.2-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows libosinfo library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 756780] New: Review Request: xosd - On-screen display library for X
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xosd - On-screen display library for X https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756780 Summary: Review Request: xosd - On-screen display library for X Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ppi...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/xosd/xosd.spec SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/xosd/xosd-2.2.14-15.fc17.src.rpm Description: XOSD displays text on your screen, sounds simple right? The difference is it is unmanaged and shaped, so it appears transparent. This gives the effect of an On Screen Display, like your TV/VCR etc. This is re-review of xosd because I want to unretire it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 751820] Review Request: pius - A tool for signing and emailing all UIDs on a set of PGP keys.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751820 Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com 2011-11-24 09:36:04 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: pius Short Description: A tool for signing and emailing all UIDs on a set of PGP keys. Owners: kumarpraveen amitshah Branches: f15 f16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 755093] Review Request: mactel-boot - boot tools for Intel Apple hardware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755093 --- Comment #17 from Mads Kiilerich m...@kiilerich.com 2011-11-24 09:39:37 EST --- Resetting PRAM and NVRAM makes no difference - except that I now have [root@fladmast ~]# efibootmgr -v BootCurrent: Timeout: 5 seconds BootOrder: 0080 Boot0080* Mac OS X ACPI(a0341d0,0)PCI(1f,2)03120a00HD(6,17716800,5000,aa0b2ede-b4b7-4105-aafa-09b6daeb8fa6) Boot* ACPI(a0341d0,0)PCI(1f,2)03120a00HD(1,28,64000,34b7e09a-8a76-42fd-8cad-6a2aaa332fff)File(\System\Library\CoreServices\boot.efi) But still, OS/X blessing through a symlink makes 'bless --info' report the target file but the firmware will skip it and boot something else (the unblessed boot.efi on ESP). Another possible difference could be that I am using a file system created by hfs-mkfs which thus doesn't have any UUID. That could perhaps prevent the firmware from making an exact match on the blessed efi and make it fall back to some other mode. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 755069] Review Request: splix - Driver for QPDL/SPL2 printers (Samsung and several Xerox printers)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755069 --- Comment #10 from Raphael Groner raph...@web.de 2011-11-24 10:48:12 EST --- Wow! That was fast reaction. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 754064] Review Request: python-mimeparse - Python module providing basic functions for parsing mime-type names
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754064 Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com 2011-11-24 11:16:17 EST --- It looks good for me, I am giving review +. Small nitpick: there is typo in changelog: directivers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 756046] Review Request: udisks2 - Disk Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756046
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com 2011-11-24 12:38:48
EST ---
Building in mock reveals a missing
BuildRequires: gobject-introspection-devel
After adding that line, it builds ok.
rpmlint output:
rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/udisks2-*.rpm
udisks2.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US udisks - disks, u disks,
Saudis
udisks2.src:98: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/udisks2/udisksd
udisks2.src: W: file-size-mismatch udisks-1.90.0.git2022.tar.bz2 = 584775,
http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/udisks-1.90.0.git2022.tar.bz2 = 640107
udisks2.x86_64: W: unexpanded-macro dependency dbus = %{dbus_version}
%{dbus_version}
udisks2.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US udisks - disks, u
disks, Saudis
udisks2.x86_64: E: executable-sourced-script
/etc/profile.d/udisksctl-bash-completion.sh 0755L
udisks2.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/udisks2 0700L
udisks2.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.freedesktop.UDisks2.conf
udisks2.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary umount.udisks2
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 6 warnings.
Some things to fix here:
- The hardcoded library path is fine, but you need to add a
%dir /lib/udisks2 to own the directory.
- The file size mismatch should be investigated and fixed.
- You need to define dbus_version
- Should make /etc/profile.d/udisksctl-bash-completion.sh non-executable
(and, as already mentioned, consider moving it)
- You should probably add a comment in the file list explaining
the permissions of /var/lib/udisks2
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 681826] Review Request: xf86-input-multitouch - Multitouch X input driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681826 Eelco Hoekema ehoek...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ehoek...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Eelco Hoekema ehoek...@gmail.com 2011-11-24 12:53:45 EST --- Is this driver still the target, or would this one be more appropriate, given the activity on the code: https://github.com/BlueDragonX/xf86-input-mtrack -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 754436] Review Request: libvirt-glib - libvirt glib integration for event
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754436 --- Comment #4 from Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com 2011-11-24 13:08:34 EST --- Builds fine in mock, rpmlint output: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/*.rpm libvirt-gconfig.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized C libvirt object APIs for processing object configuration libvirt-gconfig.x86_64: W: no-documentation libvirt-gconfig-devel.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized C libvirt object APIs for processing object configuration development files libvirt-glib.src: W: summary-not-capitalized C libvirt glib integration for events libvirt-glib.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized C libvirt glib integration for events libvirt-glib.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/libvirt-glib-0.0.1/COPYING libvirt-glib-devel.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized C libvirt glib integration for events development files libvirt-gobject.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) virtualization - visualization, actualization, vitalization libvirt-gobject.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized C libvirt object APIs for managing virtualization hosts libvirt-gobject.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US virtualization - visualization, actualization, vitalization libvirt-gobject.x86_64: W: no-documentation libvirt-gobject-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) virtualization - visualization, actualization, vitalization libvirt-gobject-devel.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized C libvirt object APIs for managing virtualization hosts development files libvirt-gobject-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US virtualization - visualization, actualization, vitalization 8 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 13 warnings. This all looks fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 698051] Review Request: spim - An assembly language MIPS32 simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698051 Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com 2011-11-24 13:42:59 EST --- Looks good. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 750139] Review Request: lv2-mdala-plugins - LV2 port of the MDA VST plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750139
--- Comment #5 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com 2011-11-24 13:41:01 EST
---
(In reply to comment #4)
RPM_OPT_FLAGS and %{optflags} are interchangeable [1]
Errr, yeah, I knew that. I don't know how I overlooked that %{optflags}. Must
be time to go see the eye doctor again...
I have contacted the author with regards to the incorrect license file, stay
tuned.
OK, thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 721174] Review Request: cryptominisat - SAT solver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721174
--- Comment #4 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com 2011-11-24 13:54:00 EST
---
Thanks for the review, Brendan. I'll fix the places that should use %{name} on
import. But I'm confused
(In reply to comment #3)
Sorry, one last thing:
fedora16:~$ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/cryptominisat-2.9.1-1.fc16.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
fedora16:~$ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/cryptominisat*.rpm
cryptominisat-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
cryptominisat-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit
/usr/lib64/libcryptominisat-2.9.1.so exit@GLIBC_2.2.5
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Is this just to satisfy the requirement to show the rpmlint output, or do you
want me to do something about the library calling exit()?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737401] Review Request: saga - Geographic information system with an API for processing geodata
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737401 Bug 737401 depends on bug 747849, which changed state. Bug 747849 Summary: Review Request: e00compr - Library to compress and uncompress E00 files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747849 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #8 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at 2011-11-24 14:08:46 EST --- Upstream has replaced the GPC polygon clipper with a free alternative, I'll also have to package. Spot regards Dxflib not free, so we'll keep it excluded. Upstream might also consider to replace Firelib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683610] Review Request: hxtools - A collection of several tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683610 --- Comment #8 from Till Maas opensou...@till.name 2011-11-24 14:35:14 EST --- Thank you, the package has been updated. I plan to use it in EPEL in the long term, therefore I keep the deprecated macros. Updated files: Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/hxtools.spec SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/hxtools-20110721-2.tillf15.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3538267 I will try to look into your review submissions soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 726080] Review Request: Xnee - X11 environment recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726080 --- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 14:54:27 EST --- Xnee-3.10.90-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/Xnee-3.10.90-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 726080] Review Request: Xnee - X11 environment recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726080 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 14:52:57 EST --- Xnee-3.10.90-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/Xnee-3.10.90-1.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 726080] Review Request: Xnee - X11 environment recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726080 --- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 14:55:40 EST --- Xnee-3.10.90-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/Xnee-3.10.90-1.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 721174] Review Request: cryptominisat - SAT solver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721174 --- Comment #5 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com 2011-11-24 15:08:55 EST --- Sorry, Jerry, yes, just after some confirmation that the exit warning is OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 754879] Review Request: kup - Kernel.org Uploader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754879 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 15:53:00 EST --- kup-0.3.1-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kup-0.3.1-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 721174] Review Request: cryptominisat - SAT solver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721174 --- Comment #6 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com 2011-11-24 15:55:30 EST --- Well, no, it isn't really okay. I'll talk to upstream about it. Here's a catalog of places where exit() is called: - Solver/DimacsParser.cpp: if there is a parse error - Solver/ClauseAllocator.cpp: if a memory allocation fails - Solver/Solver.cpp: if it is asked to solve a problem that is too large - Solver/SolverMisc.cpp: if output files cannot be opened All of those should really either throw exceptions or return error values, so the calling application can cope. What would you like me to do: import and work with upstream on the side, or wait for upstream to address this issue before importing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 756856] New: Review Request: python-pyflag - Forensic and Log Analysis GUI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-pyflag - Forensic and Log Analysis GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756856 Summary: Review Request: python-pyflag - Forensic and Log Analysis GUI Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sou...@dgplug.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://soumya.fedorapeople.org/pyflag/python-pyflag.spec SRPM URL: http://soumya.fedorapeople.org/pyflag/python-pyflag-0.85-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: This application is designed to assist IT security professionals with analyzing log files, tcpdump files and hard disk images for forensic evidence.It performs data analysis using a MYSQL database. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737401] Review Request: saga - Geographic information system with an API for processing geodata
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737401 Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #9 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com 2011-11-24 16:02:56 EST --- Thanks for the update. If you'd like to swap some more reviews to get other components into Fedora, I'd be happy to do so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 754879] Review Request: kup - Kernel.org Uploader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754879 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 16:01:47 EST --- kup-0.3.1-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kup-0.3.1-1.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683610] Review Request: hxtools - A collection of several tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683610 Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com 2011-11-24 16:05:30 EST --- OK, everything looks good. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 726080] Review Request: Xnee - X11 environment recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726080 --- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 16:33:16 EST --- Xnee-3.10.90-1.1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/Xnee-3.10.90-1.1.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683610] Review Request: hxtools - A collection of several tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683610 Till Maas opensou...@till.name changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Till Maas opensou...@till.name 2011-11-24 16:31:22 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: hxtools Short Description: A collection of several tools Owners: till Branches: f15 f16 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 721174] Review Request: cryptominisat - SAT solver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721174 --- Comment #7 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com 2011-11-24 16:38:10 EST --- This isn't a blocker Jerry but you should definitely take it upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 726080] Review Request: Xnee - X11 environment recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726080 --- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 16:59:54 EST --- Xnee-3.10.90-1.1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/Xnee-3.10.90-1.1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 726080] Review Request: Xnee - X11 environment recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726080 --- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 17:01:20 EST --- Xnee-3.10.90-1.1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/Xnee-3.10.90-1.1.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 656082] Review Request: cprops - library of C prototyping functions, mostly searching
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656082 --- Comment #10 from Philip Prindeville phil...@redfish-solutions.com 2011-11-24 17:08:35 EST --- Updated to official release: http://fedorapeople.org/~philipp/libcprops-0.1.9-0.1.fc16.src.rpm http://fedorapeople.org/~philipp/libcprops.spec [philipp@builder SPECS]$ rpmlint libcprops.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [philipp@builder SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/libcprops-0.1.9-0.1.fc16.src.rpm libcprops.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US trie - tire, true, tie libcprops.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tcp - pct, tsp, tip libcprops.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http - HTTP libcprops.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US api - pi, ape, apt libcprops.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dbms - DBMS, dims, dams 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. [philipp@builder SPECS]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 735179] Review Request: openstack-keystone - OpenStack Identity Service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735179 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 17:29:25 EST --- openstack-keystone-2011.3.1-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openstack-keystone-2011.3.1-2.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 732146] Review Request: simfqt - C++ Simulated Fare Quote System Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732146 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||simfqt-0.1.2-1.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-11-24 20:52:02 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 20:52:02 EST --- simfqt-0.1.2-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720267] Review Request: perl-smartmatch - Pluggable smart matching back-ends
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720267 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|perl-smartmatch-0.03-1.fc17 |perl-smartmatch-0.03-1.fc16 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-11-24 20:53:05 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 20:53:05 EST --- perl-smartmatch-0.03-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 704112] Review Request: recutils - A set of tools to access GNU recfile databases
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704112 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||recutils-1.4-1.fc16 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 20:57:12 EST --- recutils-1.4-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711895] Review Request: softhsm - Software version of a PKCS#11 Hardware Security Module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711895 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||softhsm-1.3.0-3.fc16 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-11-24 20:55:53 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 20:55:53 EST --- softhsm-1.3.0-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 751522] Review Request: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-SystemV - System V and POSIX timezone strings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751522 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-DateTime-TimeZone-Syst ||emV-0.005-1.fc16 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-11-24 20:55:20 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 20:55:20 EST --- perl-DateTime-TimeZone-SystemV-0.005-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711895] Review Request: softhsm - Software version of a PKCS#11 Hardware Security Module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711895 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|softhsm-1.3.0-3.fc15|softhsm-1.3.0-3.el6 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:04:09 EST --- softhsm-1.3.0-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 751531] Review Request: perl-Env-Path - Advanced operations on path variables
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751531 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Env-Path-0.18-1.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-11-24 21:02:54 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:02:54 EST --- perl-Env-Path-0.18-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747437] Review Request: perl-Data-Properties - Persistent properties
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747437 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Data-Properties-0.02-3 ||.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-11-24 21:01:54 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:01:54 EST --- perl-Data-Properties-0.02-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711895] Review Request: softhsm - Software version of a PKCS#11 Hardware Security Module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711895 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|softhsm-1.3.0-3.fc16|softhsm-1.3.0-3.fc15 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:01:13 EST --- softhsm-1.3.0-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 732146] Review Request: simfqt - C++ Simulated Fare Quote System Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732146 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|simfqt-0.1.2-1.fc15 |simfqt-0.1.2-1.fc16 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:08:06 EST --- simfqt-0.1.2-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711893] Review Request: rubygem-dnsruby - Ruby DNS(SEC) implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711893 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|rubygem-dnsruby-1.52-3.fc16 |rubygem-dnsruby-1.52-3.el5 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:08:48 EST --- rubygem-dnsruby-1.52-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 732205] Review Request: airsched - C++ Simulated Airline Schedule Manager Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732205 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|airsched-0.1.2-1.fc16 |airsched-0.1.2-1.el6 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:06:48 EST --- airsched-0.1.2-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 653805] Review Request: drupal6-ctools - This suite is primarily a set of APIs and tools to improve the developer experience.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653805 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|drupal6-ctools-1.8-6.el6|drupal6-ctools-1.8-4.el5 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:08:34 EST --- drupal6-ctools-1.8-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747849] Review Request: e00compr - Library to compress and uncompress E00 files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747849 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|e00compr-1.0.1-4.fc15 |e00compr-1.0.1-4.el6 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:07:54 EST --- e00compr-1.0.1-4.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702987] Review Request: stdair - C++ Standard Airline IT Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702987 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|stdair-0.36.2-1.fc16|rmol-0.25.2-1.el6 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:07:34 EST --- rmol-0.25.2-1.el6, travelccm-0.5.2-1.el6, airrac-0.2.1-2.el6, stdair-0.44.0-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747008] Review Request: drupal7-advanced_help - Allows module developers to store their help outside the module system in html
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747008 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||drupal7-advanced_help-1.0-0 ||.1.beta1.el5 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:09:06 EST --- drupal7-advanced_help-1.0-0.1.beta1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747018] Review Request: drupal7-calendar - This module will display any Views date field in calendar formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747018 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||drupal7-calendar-3.0-0.1.al ||pha1.el6 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:07:26 EST --- drupal7-calendar-3.0-0.1.alpha1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747035] Review Request: drupal7-views_bulk_operations - This module augments Views by allowing bulk operations to be executed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747035 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||drupal7-views_bulk_operatio ||ns-3.0-0.1.beta3.el6 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:08:57 EST --- drupal7-views_bulk_operations-3.0-0.1.beta3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 750961] Review Request: cherrytree - Hierarchical note taking application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750961 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||cherrytree-0.23.1-1.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-11-24 21:08:26 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:08:26 EST --- cherrytree-0.23.1-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711893] Review Request: rubygem-dnsruby - Ruby DNS(SEC) implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711893 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||rubygem-dnsruby-1.52-3.fc16 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-11-24 21:07:16 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:07:16 EST --- rubygem-dnsruby-1.52-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746824] Review Request: dnssec-check - A tool to check DNSSEC capabilities of the local DNS resolvers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746824 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||dnssec-check-1.11.p2-1.fc16 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-11-24 21:06:41 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:06:41 EST --- dnssec-check-1.11.p2-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711893] Review Request: rubygem-dnsruby - Ruby DNS(SEC) implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711893 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|rubygem-dnsruby-1.52-3.el5 |rubygem-dnsruby-1.52-3.fc15 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:12:48 EST --- rubygem-dnsruby-1.52-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 744944] Review Request: humanity-icon-theme - Humanity icon theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744944 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|humanity-icon-theme-0.5.3.1 |humanity-icon-theme-0.5.3.1 |1-2.fc16|1-2.fc15 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:12:39 EST --- humanity-icon-theme-0.5.3.11-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747018] Review Request: drupal7-calendar - This module will display any Views date field in calendar formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747018 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|drupal7-calendar-3.0-0.1.al |drupal7-calendar-3.0-0.1.al |pha1.el6|pha1.fc15 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:11:20 EST --- drupal7-calendar-3.0-0.1.alpha1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556128] Review Request: ff-utils - Utilities to test force feedback of input device
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556128 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||ff-utils-2.4.21-4.fc16 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-11-24 21:13:44 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:13:44 EST --- ff-utils-2.4.21-4.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 749132] Review Request: dpm-dsi - Disk Pool Manager (DPM) plugin to GridFTP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749132 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||dpm-dsi-1.8.2-5.fc16 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-11-24 21:11:02 --- Comment #46 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:11:02 EST --- dpm-dsi-1.8.2-5.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 749099] Review Request: pystache - Mustache for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749099 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||pystache-0.3.1-1.fc16 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:10:24 EST --- pystache-0.3.1-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 751531] Review Request: perl-Env-Path - Advanced operations on path variables
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751531 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Env-Path-0.18-1.fc15 |perl-Env-Path-0.18-1.fc16 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:14:22 EST --- perl-Env-Path-0.18-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747018] Review Request: drupal7-calendar - This module will display any Views date field in calendar formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747018 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|drupal7-calendar-3.0-0.1.al |drupal7-calendar-3.0-0.1.al |pha1.fc15 |pha1.el5 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:11:54 EST --- drupal7-calendar-3.0-0.1.alpha1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747035] Review Request: drupal7-views_bulk_operations - This module augments Views by allowing bulk operations to be executed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747035 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|drupal7-views_bulk_operatio |drupal7-views_bulk_operatio |ns-3.0-0.1.beta3.el6|ns-3.0-0.1.beta3.el5 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:10:35 EST --- drupal7-views_bulk_operations-3.0-0.1.beta3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747008] Review Request: drupal7-advanced_help - Allows module developers to store their help outside the module system in html
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747008 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|drupal7-advanced_help-1.0-0 |drupal7-advanced_help-1.0-0 |.1.beta1.el5|.1.beta1.el6 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:12:23 EST --- drupal7-advanced_help-1.0-0.1.beta1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746836] Review Request: dnssec-system-tray - System Tray for monitoring log files for DNSSEC errors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746836 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||dnssec-system-tray-1.11.p2- ||1.el6 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-11-24 21:10:52 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:10:52 EST --- dnssec-system-tray-1.11.p2-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 749099] Review Request: pystache - Mustache for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749099 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|pystache-0.3.1-1.fc16 |pystache-0.3.1-1.fc15 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:19:24 EST --- pystache-0.3.1-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720267] Review Request: perl-smartmatch - Pluggable smart matching back-ends
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720267 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-smartmatch-0.03-1.fc16 |perl-smartmatch-0.03-1.fc15 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:19:00 EST --- perl-smartmatch-0.03-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747437] Review Request: perl-Data-Properties - Persistent properties
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747437 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Data-Properties-0.02-3 |perl-Data-Properties-0.02-3 |.fc15 |.fc16 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:19:41 EST --- perl-Data-Properties-0.02-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 751522] Review Request: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-SystemV - System V and POSIX timezone strings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751522 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-DateTime-TimeZone-Syst |perl-DateTime-TimeZone-Syst |emV-0.005-1.fc16|emV-0.005-1.fc15 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:15:20 EST --- perl-DateTime-TimeZone-SystemV-0.005-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747018] Review Request: drupal7-calendar - This module will display any Views date field in calendar formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747018 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|drupal7-calendar-3.0-0.1.al |drupal7-calendar-3.0-0.1.al |pha1.el5|pha1.fc16 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:23:32 EST --- drupal7-calendar-3.0-0.1.alpha1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 755358] Review Request: jcal - Unix cal-like interface to libjalali
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755358 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:24:32 EST --- jcal-0.4.1-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720267] Review Request: perl-smartmatch - Pluggable smart matching back-ends
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720267 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-smartmatch-0.03-1.fc15 |perl-smartmatch-0.03-1.fc14 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:21:50 EST --- perl-smartmatch-0.03-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 704112] Review Request: recutils - A set of tools to access GNU recfile databases
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704112 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|recutils-1.4-1.fc16 |recutils-1.4-1.fc15 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:23:13 EST --- recutils-1.4-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747008] Review Request: drupal7-advanced_help - Allows module developers to store their help outside the module system in html
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747008 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|drupal7-advanced_help-1.0-0 |drupal7-advanced_help-1.0-0 |.1.beta1.el6|.1.beta1.fc15 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:21:34 EST --- drupal7-advanced_help-1.0-0.1.beta1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 751533] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Has-Sugar - Sugar syntax for moose 'has' fields
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751533 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-MooseX-Has-Sugar-0.050 ||70419-2.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-11-24 21:24:48 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:24:48 EST --- perl-MooseX-Has-Sugar-0.05070419-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730495] Review Request: perl-Net-Lite-FTP - Perl FTP client with support for TLS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730495 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Net-Lite-FTP-0.61-3.fc |perl-Net-Lite-FTP-0.61-3.fc |16 |15 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:29:15 EST --- perl-Net-Lite-FTP-0.61-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746824] Review Request: dnssec-check - A tool to check DNSSEC capabilities of the local DNS resolvers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746824 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|dnssec-check-1.11.p2-1.fc16 |dnssec-check-1.11.p2-1.fc14 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:25:09 EST --- dnssec-check-1.11.p2-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730495] Review Request: perl-Net-Lite-FTP - Perl FTP client with support for TLS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730495 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Net-Lite-FTP-0.61-3.fc ||16 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-11-24 21:28:23 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:28:23 EST --- perl-Net-Lite-FTP-0.61-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747035] Review Request: drupal7-views_bulk_operations - This module augments Views by allowing bulk operations to be executed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747035 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|drupal7-views_bulk_operatio |drupal7-views_bulk_operatio |ns-3.0-0.1.beta3.fc15 |ns-3.0-0.1.beta3.fc16 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:30:19 EST --- drupal7-views_bulk_operations-3.0-0.1.beta3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 751533] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Has-Sugar - Sugar syntax for moose 'has' fields
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751533 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-MooseX-Has-Sugar-0.050 |perl-MooseX-Has-Sugar-0.050 |70419-2.fc15|70419-2.fc16 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:30:01 EST --- perl-MooseX-Has-Sugar-0.05070419-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746824] Review Request: dnssec-check - A tool to check DNSSEC capabilities of the local DNS resolvers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746824 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|dnssec-check-1.11.p2-1.fc14 |dnssec-check-1.11.p2-1.fc15 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-24 21:32:54 EST --- dnssec-check-1.11.p2-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
