[Bug 759697] New: Review Request: perl-Package-New - Simple base package from which to inherit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Package-New - Simple base package from which to inherit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759697 Summary: Review Request: perl-Package-New - Simple base package from which to inherit Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: da...@geocities.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://linux.davisnetworks.com/yumrepo/fc/16/SPEC/perl-Package-New.spec SRPM URL: http://linux.davisnetworks.com/yumrepo/fc/16/SRPMS/perl-Package-New-0.07-1.fc16.src.rpm Description : The Package::New object provides a consistent object constructor for : objects. Requirement for perl-DBIx-Array-Connect -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 759697] Review Request: perl-Package-New - Simple base package from which to inherit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759697 mrdvt92 da...@geocities.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #1 from mrdvt92 da...@geocities.com 2011-12-03 02:05:06 EST --- $ rpmlint ./perl-Package-New.spec ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/perl-Package-New-0.07-1.fc16.src.rpm rpmlint is clean -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 759698] New: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Array-Connect - Database connections from a configuration file
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Array-Connect - Database connections from a configuration file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759698 Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Array-Connect - Database connections from a configuration file Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: da...@geocities.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://linux.davisnetworks.com/yumrepo/fc/16/SPEC/perl-DBIx-Array-Connect.spec SRPM URL: http://linux.davisnetworks.com/yumrepo/fc/16/SRPMS/perl-DBIx-Array-Connect-0.04-3.fc16.src.rpm Description : Provides an easy way to construct database objects and connect to : databases while providing an easy way to centralize management of database : connection strings. rpmlint is clean $ rpmlint perl-DBIx-Array-Connect.spec perl-DBIx-Array-Connect-0.04-3.fc16.src.rpm 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 754892] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Array - This module is a wrapper around DBI with array interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754892 mrdvt92 da...@geocities.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||759698 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 759697] Review Request: perl-Package-New - Simple base package from which to inherit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759697 mrdvt92 da...@geocities.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||759698 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 759697] Review Request: perl-Package-New - Simple base package from which to inherit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759697 mrdvt92 da...@geocities.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||759698 Depends on|759698 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 758958] Review Request: ghc-simple-sendfile - Cross-platform sendfile system call
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758958
Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||lakshminaras2...@gmail.com
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lakshminaras2...@gmail.com
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com 2011-12-03
01:04:27 EST ---
[+]MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review.
rpmlint -i ghc-simple-sendfile-0.1.3-1.fc15.src.rpm
ghc-simple-sendfile-devel-0.1.3-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm
ghc-simple-sendfile-0.1.3-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm ../ghc-simple-sendfile.spec
ghc-simple-sendfile.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US minimumize -
minimize, minimum, feminize
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-simple-sendfile-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
minimumize - minimize, minimum, feminize
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-simple-sendfile.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US minimumize
- minimize, minimum, feminize
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
Spelling error needs to be corrected.
[+]MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+]MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec
[+]MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
Naming-Yes
Version-release - Matches
License - OK. BSD license.
No prebuilt external bits - OK
Spec legibity - OK
Package template - OK
Arch support - OK
Libexecdir - OK
rpmlint - yes
changelogs - OK
Source url tag - OK, validated.
Build Requires list - OK
Summary and description - OK
API documentation - OK, in devel package
[+]MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines .
[+]MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+]MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
LICENSE file is included.
[+]MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+]MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+]MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source,as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task.
md5sum ghc-simple-sendfile-0.1.3-1.fc16.src/simple-sendfile-0.1.3.tar.gz
40ea33dd251b6a59da2f4ecb6e366c45
ghc-simple-sendfile-0.1.3-1.fc16.src/simple-sendfile-0.1.3.tar.gz
md5sum simple-sendfile-0.1.3.tar.gz
40ea33dd251b6a59da2f4ecb6e366c45 simple-sendfile-0.1.3.tar.gz
[+]MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
Built on x86_64.
[+]MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
[+]MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[+]MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
Checked with rpmquery --list
[NA]MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review.
[+]MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
Checked with rpmquery --whatprovides.
[+]MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings.
[+]MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
Checked with ls -lR
[+]MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+]MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[+]MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+]MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application.
[+]MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[+]MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency: Requires: {name} = %{version}-%{release}
rpm -e ghc-simple-sendfile
error: Failed dependencies:
ghc(simple-sendfile-0.1.3) = dad3609694e5c7e9a1a965692a4d1c5e is needed
by (installed) ghc-simple-sendfile-devel-0.1.3-1.fc15.x86_64
ghc-simple-sendfile = 0.1.3-1.fc15 is needed by (installed)
ghc-simple-sendfile-devel-0.1.3-1.fc15.x86_64
[NA]MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be
removed in the spec if they are built.
[NA]MUST: Packages
[Bug 754892] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Array - This module is a wrapper around DBI with array interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754892 mrdvt92 da...@geocities.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||759698 Depends on|759698 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 759698] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Array-Connect - Database connections from a configuration file
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759698 mrdvt92 da...@geocities.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|754892, 759697 | Depends on||754892, 759697 --- Comment #1 from mrdvt92 da...@geocities.com 2011-12-03 02:17:47 EST --- Fixed the depends on/block logic. perl-DBIx-Array-Connect depends on perl-Package-New and perl-DBIx-Array. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 759712] Review Request: dragonegg - GCC plugin to use LLVM optimizers and code generators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759712 --- Comment #1 from Eric Smith e...@brouhaha.com 2011-12-03 06:13:32 EST --- I've found that DragonEgg 3.0 seems to work fine with the LLVM 3.0.rc3 in rawhide, so I loosened the buildrequires and updated the spec. Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/dragonegg/dragonegg.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/dragonegg/dragonegg-3.0-1.fc16.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697247] Review Request: gsmartcontrol - Graphical user interface for smartctl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697247 --- Comment #6 from Eric Smith e...@brouhaha.com 2011-12-03 06:11:13 EST --- Updated per review comments. Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/gsmartcontrol/gsmartcontrol.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/gsmartcontrol/gsmartcontrol-0.8.6-1.fc14.src.rpm Koji scratch build for F16: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3559721 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 759712] New: Review Request: dragonegg - GCC plugin to use LLVM optimizers and code generators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dragonegg - GCC plugin to use LLVM optimizers and code generators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759712 Summary: Review Request: dragonegg - GCC plugin to use LLVM optimizers and code generators Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: e...@brouhaha.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/dragonegg/dragonegg.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/dragonegg/dragonegg-3.0-0.1.rc3.fc16.src.rpm Description: DragonEgg is a GCC plugin that replaces GCC's optimizers and code generators with those from the LLVM project. Note that this package is for DragonEgg 3.0.rc3 rather than 3.0 final. This is because the LLVM package in rawhide is currently 3.0.rc3. I have done private builds of both LLVM 3.0 and DragonEgg 3.0 on Fedora 16, and verified that both work. I will update the DragonEgg spec for 3.0 final once the rawhide LLVM package is updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 759698] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Array-Connect - Database connections from a configuration file
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759698 mrdvt92 da...@geocities.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR), ||754892, 759697 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 757156] Review Request: perl-Env-C - Get/Set/Unset Environment Variables on the C level
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757156 --- Comment #4 from Willington Vega wv...@wvega.com 2011-12-03 09:12:38 EST --- Hi Jan, I agree, those spelling errors are not a problem and reporting the issue with the directory ownership back to the cpanspec package is a good idea. I've seen on other reviews that is good to provide the updated spec file and srpm as a different one, with the modifications, an increased release number and the corresponding Changelog documentation. It is also helpful when comparing spec files to debug errors like the one I'm going to describe next: The package no longer builds in mock from the SRPM: mock SRPMS/perl-Env-C-0.08-1.fc15.src.rpm The important part of the build.log file says: + make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl -Iblib/lib -Iblib/arch test.pl Can't locate Test/More.pm in @INC (@INC contains: blib/lib blib/arch /usr/local/lib64/perl5 /usr/local/share/perl5 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib64/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 .) at test.pl line 4. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at test.pl line 4. make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 2 RPM build errors: error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.yd2GUq (%check) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.yd2GUq (%check) Child returncode was: 1 The problem is your updated spec file no longer BuildRequires perl(Test::More). Thank you for your quick update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 759747] New: Review Request: sk1libs - Universal vector graphics translator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sk1libs - Universal vector graphics translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759747 Summary: Review Request: sk1libs - Universal vector graphics translator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pa...@hubbitus.info QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://hubbitus.info/rpm/Fedora15/sk1libs/sk1libs.spec SRPM URL: http://hubbitus.info/rpm/Fedora15/sk1libs/sk1libs-0.9.1-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: sk1libs is a universal vector graphics library for Python. P.S. Spec file formatted by tabs with 5 space width ( http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PavelAlexeev/tabsize ). Please, do not start review if it is a problem for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 759757] New: Review Request: perl-Encode-EUCJPASCII - EucJP-ascii - An eucJP-open mapping
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Encode-EUCJPASCII - EucJP-ascii - An eucJP-open mapping https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759757 Summary: Review Request: perl-Encode-EUCJPASCII - EucJP-ascii - An eucJP-open mapping Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xav...@bachelot.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/perl-Encode-EUCJPASCII.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-Encode-EUCJPASCII-0.03-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: This module provides eucJP-ascii, one of eucJP-open mappings, and its derivative. This module is needed for better test coverage in perl-MIME-Charset. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 759758] New: Review Request: perl-Encode-HanExtra - Extra sets of Chinese encodings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Encode-HanExtra - Extra sets of Chinese encodings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759758 Summary: Review Request: perl-Encode-HanExtra - Extra sets of Chinese encodings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xav...@bachelot.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/perl-Encode-HanExtra.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-Encode-HanExtra-0.23-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Perl 5.7.3 and later ships with an adequate set of Chinese encodings, including the commonly used CP950, CP936 (also known as GBK), Big5 (alias for Big5-Eten), Big5-HKSCS, EUC-CN, HZ, and ISO-IR-165. However, the numbers of Chinese encodings are staggering, and a complete coverage will easily increase the size of perl distribution by several megabytes; hence, this CPAN module tries to provide the rest of them. If you are using Perl 5.8 or later, Encode::CN and Encode::TW will automatically load the extra encodings for you, so there's no need to explicitly write use Encode::HanExtra if you are using one of them already. This module is needed for better test coverage in perl-MIME-Charset. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 759760] New: Review Request: perl-Encode-JIS2K - JIS X 0212 (aka JIS 2000) Encodings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Encode-JIS2K - JIS X 0212 (aka JIS 2000) Encodings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759760 Summary: Review Request: perl-Encode-JIS2K - JIS X 0212 (aka JIS 2000) Encodings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xav...@bachelot.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/perl-Encode-JIS2K.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-Encode-JIS2K-0.02-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: This module implements encodings that covers JIS X 0213 charset (AKA JIS 2000, hence the module name). This module is needed for better test coverage in perl-MIME-Charset. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 722640] Review Request: R-qcc - SQC package for R
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722640 --- Comment #14 from Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr 2011-12-03 10:59:35 EST --- Small changes but if you don't intend to have an EL5 branch there is some cleaning you can do on the spec: - The buildroot http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag - The clean section http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25clean I will try to finish the review tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701801] Review Request: ast - A Library for Handling World Coordinate Systems in Astronomy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701801
Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com 2011-12-03 11:19:51
EST ---
Rpmlint output:
ast.src:12: W: macro-in-comment %{srcver}
ast.src: W: invalid-url Source0: ast-6.0-1.tar.gz
ast-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/ast-6.0-1/loader.h
ast-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US prog - prig, prof,
pro
ast-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
ast-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ast_link
Package and spec are named according the guidelines
License is GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+
Specfile legible
Source matches upstream, source follows the convention for Troublesome URLs
(see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL)
Package builds, No ExcludeArch needed
BuildRequires listed
ldconfig called properly
No bundled libraries (the files from wcslib have been modified by ast
developers, so I don't consider it to be the same library.)
Owns directories it creates
Macros are consistent
Large docs are in -doc subpackage
Headers and .so are in -devel subpackage
-devel requires base package
No .la files
BuildRoot is not needed
%clean is not needed
Package is APPROVED
By the way, you are not required to fix the incorrect FSF address. But if you
do, please fix also loader.h before uploading
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746438] Review Request: rubygem-cairo - Ruby bindings for cairo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746438 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-12-03 12:55:07 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-03 12:55:07 EST --- Packages now successfully imported into F17/F16-testing/F15-testing. Thank you for the review and scm procedure, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 755510] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet - Gnome shell system monitor extension
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755510
--- Comment #4 from nicolas.vievi...@univ-valenciennes.fr 2011-12-03 13:30:39
EST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Initial review, although this requires an official sponsor, and I am not one.
Thanks for the review.
I'm not sure how to handle you having multiple srpms. I've done this review on
the Fedora 16 srpm
I thought one srpm should be able to build for 15 and 16.
Yes this should be done, but in this case sources are different and not
compatible, so 2 srpm files were build with 2 different sources tarball files.
Never mind, I've splitted the files in two independent sets of files: one for
F-15 and one for F-16
[ snip ]
[FAIL] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this
task.
If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source
URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this.
$ wget
https://github.com/paradoxxxzero/gnome-shell-system-monitor-applet/tarball/master/paradoxxxzero-gnome-shell-system-monitor-applet-1.99-83-gaffc741.tar.gz
--2011-11-29 15:31:53--
https://github.com/paradoxxxzero/gnome-shell-system-monitor-applet/tarball/master/paradoxxxzero-gnome-shell-system-monitor-applet-1.99-83-gaffc741.tar.gz
...snip...
2011-11-29 15:31:53 (465 KB/s) - “master” saved [21050/21050]
$ md5sum master
paradoxxxzero-gnome-shell-system-monitor-applet-1.99-83-gaffc741.tar.gz
ce12f169445b20e3686b15a3e4c25d6b master # wget
ce12f169445b20e3686b15a3e4c25d6b
paradoxxxzero-gnome-shell-system-monitor-applet-1.99-83-gaffc741.tar.gz
#extracted from srpm
As sources tarball files can only be downloaded from github via web links
redirected, wget fails probably in interpreting javascripts and then cannot
rename the tarball file as the browser can do it. That's why you get a file
named master instead of
paradoxxxzero-gnome-shell-system-monitor-applet-1.99-83-gaffc741.tar.gz. To
deal with this and to try to be as closed as possible of Fedora packaging
guides, I've modified the spec file and deleted the URL string and kept only
the tarball file name. I also added comments in the spec file to explain how to
download the right file. Hope this is the right manner to deal with such a
case.
[ snip ]
[?PASS?] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by
using
the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
I see that the tranlations are installed into the forbidden directory but then
%find_lang is called.
I think this is correct but need a follow up on this PASS
I have to install locales in %{_datadir}/locale/$LANG for each translation
before calling %find_lang, because there's no Makefile with install section in
it for this Gnome shell extension. I've tried several alternatives but none of
them were satisfying and causes %find_lang to fail. Every suggestion on this
point are welcome.
[ snip ]
[FAIL] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a
%{name}.desktop
file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in
the
%install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need
a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your
explanation.
I see the .desktop file but not the desktop-file-install in the %install
section
Corrected: desktop-file-install added in the %install section
[ snip ]
[FAIL] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file
should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
Sorry for that, but the upstream sources lacks of it, and my skill in such
things isn't sufficient to produce these translations. Any suggestions for that
are welcome.
[ snip ]
[FAIL] SHOULD: your package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts. If
it doesn't, work with upstream to add them where they make sense.
Upstream developers only provides the README.md file and didn't felt necessary
to build a man page for this Gnome shell extension.
I hope this explanation would be sufficient and I'm open to any suggestion to
modify the point that must be corrected.
Here are the new URLs for SPEC files, the new URLs for SRPMS files and the new
rpmlint logs.
F-16 Spec URL:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/25699833/Fedora/F-16/gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet/gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet.spec
F-16 SRPM URL:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/25699833/Fedora/F-16/gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet/gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet-1.99-1.fc16.src.rpm
F-15 Spec URL:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/25699833/Fedora/F-15/gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet/gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet.spec
F-15 SRPM URL:
[Bug 757242] Review Request: analitza - Library of mathematical features
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757242 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-12-03 13:36:32 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: analitza Short Description: Library of mathematical features Owners: than jreznik ltinkl rnovacek rdieter kkofler Branches: f16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 759779] Review Request: rachota - Straightforward timetracking
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759779 Sébastien Willmann sebastien.willm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183(FE-JAVASIG) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 722640] Review Request: R-qcc - SQC package for R
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722640 --- Comment #13 from John J. McDonough wb8...@arrl.net 2011-12-03 10:30:31 EST --- Changes made: http://jjmcd.fedorapeople.org/Download/R-qcc.spec http://jjmcd.fedorapeople.org/Download/R-qcc-2.2-2.fc16.src.rpm Question: I only used packname in those places that apply to pretty much all packages, and explicitly said qcc in places unique to this one. While that makes sense to me, perhaps it isn't the normal practice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 757242] Review Request: analitza - Library of mathematical features
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757242 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-12-03 14:10:28 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 759779] New: Review Request: rachota - Straightforward timetracking
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rachota - Straightforward timetracking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759779 Summary: Review Request: rachota - Straightforward timetracking Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sebastien.willm...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://wilqu.fr/rpms/rachota/rachota.spec SRPM URL: http://wilqu.fr/rpms/rachota/rachota-2.4-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Rachota is a portable application for timetracking different projects. It runs everywhere. It displays time data in diagram form, creates customized reports and invoices or analyses measured data and suggests hints to improve user's time usage. The totally portable yet personal timetracker. Rpmlint output: % rpmlint rachota-* rachota.noarch: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US rachota.noarch: W: no-documentation rachota.src: W: invalid-url Source0: rachota.tar.gz 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 755510] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet - Gnome shell system monitor extension
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755510 --- Comment #5 from Alex Lancaster al...@users.sourceforge.net 2011-12-03 14:24:18 EST --- (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #3) Initial review, although this requires an official sponsor, and I am not one. Thanks for the review. I'm not sure how to handle you having multiple srpms. I've done this review on the Fedora 16 srpm I thought one srpm should be able to build for 15 and 16. Yes this should be done, but in this case sources are different and not compatible, so 2 srpm files were build with 2 different sources tarball files. Never mind, I've splitted the files in two independent sets of files: one for F-15 and one for F-16 Generally it's only necessary to review a single SRPM that's going into rawhide. It's assumed that the maintainer can make the necessary changes (including using different versions) for packages that go into currently maintained releases (in this case F15 and F16). Having said that, it probably doesn't do any harm to include the version for F15, but the reviewer should base his or her review on the version going into rawhide. (I assume that the F16 and rawhide version will be the same). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 691195] Review Request: wmnet - Network monitoring dockapp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691195 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-03 15:50:38 EST --- wmnet-1.06-5.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wmnet-1.06-5.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 691195] Review Request: wmnet - Network monitoring dockapp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691195 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-03 15:50:48 EST --- wmnet-1.06-5.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wmnet-1.06-5.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 691195] Review Request: wmnet - Network monitoring dockapp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691195 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683587] Review Request: gsi-openssh - An implementation of the SSH protocol with GSI authentication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683587 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|gsi-openssh-5.8p2-2.fc16|gsi-openssh-4.3p2-3.el5 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-03 15:54:13 EST --- gsi-openssh-4.3p2-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683587] Review Request: gsi-openssh - An implementation of the SSH protocol with GSI authentication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683587 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|gsi-openssh-4.3p2-3.el5 |gsi-openssh-5.3p1-3.el6 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-03 15:54:30 EST --- gsi-openssh-5.3p1-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 753911] Review Request: django-profiles - A fairly simple user-profile management application for Django
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753911 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||django-profiles-0.2-1.el6 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-12-03 15:57:25 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-03 15:57:25 EST --- django-profiles-0.2-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 754848] Review Request: python-webob1.0 - WSGI request and response object
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754848 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-webob1.0-1.0.8-3.el6 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-12-03 15:55:47 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-03 15:55:47 EST --- python-webob1.0-1.0.8-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 750664] Review Request: drupal7-footnotes - Allows to easily create automatically numbered footnote references
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750664 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||drupal7-footnotes-2.5-4.el5 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-03 15:55:38 EST --- drupal7-footnotes-2.5-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 750664] Review Request: drupal7-footnotes - Allows to easily create automatically numbered footnote references
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750664 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|drupal7-footnotes-2.5-4.el5 |drupal7-footnotes-2.5-4.el6 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-03 15:57:17 EST --- drupal7-footnotes-2.5-4.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 626068] Review Request: mot-adms - An electrical compact device models converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626068 Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-12-03 16:36:53 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 713313] Review Request: msktutil - Program for interoperability with Active Directory
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713313 --- Comment #31 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com 2011-12-03 16:16:13 EST --- (In reply to comment #30) you handle RHEL and Fedora, but not EPEL or Centos... The nice thing is that both CentOS and EPEL populate the rhel dist tag. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:DistTag . So this will still work. Nevertheless, your code is clearer, so I'll go ahead and use that. Thanks. Requires: cyrus-sasl-gssapi is this strictly necessary? Rpm is usually pretty good about running 'ldd' on the generated objects and inferring dependencies. I verified that it is necessary. When I don't include it, there is no requirement for libgssapiv2.so: $ rpm -qp --requires msktutil-0.4-5.el5.x86_64.rpm | grep gss I've put up a new release here. http://adiemus.org/~kdreyer/rpms/msktutil.spec http://adiemus.org/~kdreyer/rpms/msktutil-0.4-7.el5.src.rpm Changes since -5: * Sat Dec 3 2011 Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com 0.4-7 - Adjust conditionals for setting CPPFLAGS and KRB5_CONFIG - Use PATH_KRB5_CONFIG instead of KRB5_CONFIG when running configure, since the latter is used by the Kerberos libraries to specify an alternative path to krb5.conf. Thanks again Russ Allbery. * Mon Oct 3 2011 Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com 0.4-6 - Adjust regex in krb5-config patch. Thanks Russ Allbery. Koji scatch builds: F17: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3560531 EL6: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3560534 EL5: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3560539 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700834] Review Request: wmsystemtray - System tray (freedesktop.org systray protocol) as a Window Maker dock app
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700834 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-03 16:59:06 EST --- wmsystemtray-1.2-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wmsystemtray-1.2-2.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700834] Review Request: wmsystemtray - System tray (freedesktop.org systray protocol) as a Window Maker dock app
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700834 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700834] Review Request: wmsystemtray - System tray (freedesktop.org systray protocol) as a Window Maker dock app
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700834 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-03 16:59:15 EST --- wmsystemtray-1.2-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wmsystemtray-1.2-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 759803] New: Review Request: tclap - Templatized command-line argument parser for C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tclap - Templatized command-line argument parser for C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759803 Summary: Review Request: tclap - Templatized command-line argument parser for C++ Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: e...@brouhaha.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/tclap/tclap.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/tclap/tclap-1.2.1-1.fc14.src.rpm Koji build for rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3560588 Description: TCLAP is a small, flexible library that provides a simple interface for defining and accessing command line arguments. It was initially inspired by the user friendly CLAP library. The difference is that this library is templatized, so the argument class is type independent. Type independence avoids identical-except-for-type objects, such as IntArg, FloatArg, and StringArg. While the library is not strictly compliant with the GNU or POSIX standards, it is close. NOTE: I am packaging tclap as a prerequisite to packaging OpenNERO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo - A program which a Linux user can utilize to create a rescue/restore CD/tape
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 --- Comment #59 from Bruno Cornec br...@victoria.frmug.org 2011-12-03 20:01:49 EST --- Buffer is now submitted at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759818 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 759803] Review Request: tclap - Templatized command-line argument parser for C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759803 --- Comment #1 from Eric Smith e...@brouhaha.com 2011-12-03 20:53:42 EST --- Removed the extraneous requires tags, there is no base package. Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/tclap/tclap.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/tclap/tclap-1.2.1-2.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 732215] Review Request: mined - Powerful Text Editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732215 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||mined-2011.19-3.fc16.1 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-12-03 21:29:10 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-03 21:29:10 EST --- mined-2011.19-3.fc16.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 734410] Review Request: abootimg - tool for manipulating Android boot images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734410 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||abootimg-0.6-3.20110830gitf ||f8e759.fc16 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-12-03 21:25:18 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-03 21:25:18 EST --- abootimg-0.6-3.20110830gitff8e759.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 751917] Review Request: ghc-zlib-enum - Enumerator interface for zlib compression
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751917 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||ghc-zlib-enum-0.2.1-1.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-12-03 21:39:30 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-03 21:39:30 EST --- ghc-zlib-enum-0.2.1-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728701] Review Request: libalkimia - Financial library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728701 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|kmymoney-4.6.0-1.fc16 |kmymoney-4.6.0-1.fc15 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-03 21:39:41 EST --- kmymoney-4.6.0-1.fc15, libalkimia-4.3.1-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 750664] Review Request: drupal7-footnotes - Allows to easily create automatically numbered footnote references
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750664 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|drupal7-footnotes-2.5-4.fc1 |drupal7-footnotes-2.5-4.fc1 |5 |6 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-03 21:26:16 EST --- drupal7-footnotes-2.5-4.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 741129] Review Request: OpenStego - Free Steganography solution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741129 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-03 21:26:48 EST --- OpenStego-0.5.2-6.1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 754088] Review Request: python-restauth-common - Collects various code used in RestAuth server/client implementations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754088 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-03 21:22:00 EST --- python-restauth-common-0.5.1-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 750664] Review Request: drupal7-footnotes - Allows to easily create automatically numbered footnote references
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750664 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|drupal7-footnotes-2.5-4.el6 |drupal7-footnotes-2.5-4.fc1 ||5 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-03 21:25:56 EST --- drupal7-footnotes-2.5-4.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 754123] Review Request: fedora-review - Tool to automate package reviews
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754123 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||fedora-review-0.1.1-1.fc16 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-12-03 21:29:01 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-03 21:29:01 EST --- fedora-review-0.1.1-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705249] Review Request: ibus-tutcode - Japanese TUT-Code input method for ibus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705249 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||ibus-tutcode-1.0.1-1.fc16 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-03 21:29:20 EST --- ibus-tutcode-1.0.1-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 751917] Review Request: ghc-zlib-enum - Enumerator interface for zlib compression
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751917 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ghc-zlib-enum-0.2.1-1.fc15 |ghc-zlib-enum-0.2.1-1.fc16 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-03 21:46:37 EST --- ghc-zlib-enum-0.2.1-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 751564] Review Request: aeolus-audrey-agent - The Aeolus Audrey Startup Agent
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751564 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-03 21:45:37 EST --- aeolus-audrey-agent-0.4.0-9.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 754123] Review Request: fedora-review - Tool to automate package reviews
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754123 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|fedora-review-0.1.1-1.fc16 |fedora-review-0.1.1-1.fc15 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-03 21:42:32 EST --- fedora-review-0.1.1-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 759823] New: Review Request: libkdtree++ - C++ template container implementation of kd-tree sorting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libkdtree++ - C++ template container implementation of kd-tree sorting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759823 Summary: Review Request: libkdtree++ - C++ template container implementation of kd-tree sorting Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: e...@brouhaha.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/libkdtree++/libkdtree++.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/libkdtree++/libkdtree++-0.7.0-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: libkdtree++ is a C++ template container implementation of k-dimensional space sorting, using a kd-tree. NOTE: I am packaging libkdtree++ as a prerequisite to packaging OpenNERO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705249] Review Request: ibus-tutcode - Japanese TUT-Code input method for ibus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705249 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ibus-tutcode-1.0.1-1.fc16 |ibus-tutcode-1.0.1-1.fc15 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-03 21:40:21 EST --- ibus-tutcode-1.0.1-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742166] Review Request: wmctrl - X Window Manager command-line tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742166 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-03 21:43:44 EST --- wmctrl-1.07-9.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 754094] Review Request: restauth - Web-service providing shared authentication, authorization and preferences
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754094 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-03 21:42:26 EST --- restauth-0.5.2-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 755358] Review Request: jcal - Unix cal-like interface to libjalali
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755358 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||jcal-0.4.1-2.fc16 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-12-03 21:43:35 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-03 21:43:35 EST --- jcal-0.4.1-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 757484] Review Request: perl-Router-Simple - Simple HTTP router
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757484 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-03 21:38:48 EST --- perl-Router-Simple-0.09-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 759697] Review Request: perl-Package-New - Simple base package from which to inherit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759697 --- Comment #2 from mrdvt92 da...@geocities.com 2011-12-03 21:23:51 EST --- updated to 0.07-2 CPAN never symlinked the tar ball so I had to update the spec to point to the non-symlinked URL. SRPM: http://linux.davisnetworks.com/yumrepo/fc/16/SRPMS/perl-Package-New-0.07-2.fc16.src.rpm SPEC: http://linux.davisnetworks.com/yumrepo/fc/16/SPEC/perl-Package-New.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 755358] Review Request: jcal - Unix cal-like interface to libjalali
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755358 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|jcal-0.4.1-2.fc16 |jcal-0.4.1-2.fc15 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-03 21:45:29 EST --- jcal-0.4.1-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 732215] Review Request: mined - Powerful Text Editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732215 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|mined-2011.19-3.fc16.1 |mined-2011.19-3.fc15.1 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-03 21:43:16 EST --- mined-2011.19-3.fc15.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 756179] Review Request: aeolus-configserver - The Aeolus Audrey Config Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756179 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-03 21:41:59 EST --- aeolus-configserver-0.4.1-4.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 713313] Review Request: msktutil - Program for interoperability with Active Directory
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713313 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-03 21:46:29 EST --- Package ykpers-1.6.2-1.fc16: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing ykpers-1.6.2-1.fc16' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-16747/ykpers-1.6.2-1.fc16 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
