[Bug 694479] Review Request: pcl - Library for point cloud processing

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694479

--- Comment #9 from Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de 2011-12-24 04:52:56 EST 
---
Thanks for the review Rich. I have uploaded the new version 1.3.1-2 which fixes
the issues, especially the docs issue. Thanks for pointing this out, I just
missed it. Additionally I have sorted out the OpenNI problems and published a
new OpenNI (and PrimeSense) update. It is tagged for the next four days into
the buildroot of f15 and f16. I have done scratch builds on both, f15 and f16.
The OpenNI updates will land in f15/f16 updates before pcl, so I think this is
no longer a reason not to complete this review. I added a short comment why
there are no .desktop files in the spec file (I did this after the scratch
builds hence it is only in the spec, not in the srpms).

New SRPM is at http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/robotics/pcl-1.3.1-2.fc15.src.rpm,
spec file changed in place.

Scratch builds:
f15: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3604183
f16: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3604194

I hope these takes the pcl package to an acceptable state.
Merry Christmas/happy holidays.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 694479] Review Request: pcl - Library for point cloud processing

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694479

--- Comment #9 from Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de 2011-12-24 04:52:56 EST 
---
Thanks for the review Rich. I have uploaded the new version 1.3.1-2 which fixes
the issues, especially the docs issue. Thanks for pointing this out, I just
missed it. Additionally I have sorted out the OpenNI problems and published a
new OpenNI (and PrimeSense) update. It is tagged for the next four days into
the buildroot of f15 and f16. I have done scratch builds on both, f15 and f16.
The OpenNI updates will land in f15/f16 updates before pcl, so I think this is
no longer a reason not to complete this review. I added a short comment why
there are no .desktop files in the spec file (I did this after the scratch
builds hence it is only in the spec, not in the srpms).

New SRPM is at http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/robotics/pcl-1.3.1-2.fc15.src.rpm,
spec file changed in place.

Scratch builds:
f15: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3604183
f16: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3604194

I hope these takes the pcl package to an acceptable state.
Merry Christmas/happy holidays.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 621416] Review Request: libgeotiff -- GeoTIFF format library

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416

--- Comment #36 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at 2011-12-24 06:44:08 EST 
---
Yes, it's only about the data. I can't say anything about Balint's proposal
though.

I'll try to start an appeal to Osgeo to find a sustainable solution to that
problem. I contacted Debian's maintainer as a first step, as they suffer from
the same problem.

Debian has an -epsg sub-package, so removing the data seems to be possible, but
is not desireable, I fear.

Libtiff 4.0 was announced yesterday as well.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 709328] Review Request: psi-plus - Jabber client based on Qt

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709328

--- Comment #29 from Raphael Groner raph...@web.de 2011-12-24 08:22:37 EST ---
(In reply to comment #28)
 What for is need libicu-devel?

From koji build.log:
Unable to load library icui18n Cannot load library icui18n: (libicui18n.so.46:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory) 

$ yum info libicu
Name   : libicu
Zusammenfassung : International Components for Unicode - libraries
URL: http://www.icu-project.org/
Lizenz : MIT and UCD and Public Domain
Beschreibung : The International Components for Unicode (ICU) libraries provide
 : robust and full-featured Unicode services on a wide variety of
 : platforms. ICU supports the most current version of the Unicode
 : standard, and they provide support for supplementary Unicode
 : characters (needed for GB 18030 repertoire support).
 : As computing environments become more heterogeneous, software
 : portability becomes more important. ICU lets you produce the
same
 : results across all the various platforms you support, without
 : sacrificing performance. It offers great flexibility to extend
 : and customize the supplied services.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 770152] Review Request: gnome-boxes - A simple GNOME 3 application to access remote or virtual systems

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770152

--- Comment #3 from Christophe Fergeau cferg...@redhat.com 2011-12-24 
10:02:39 EST ---
The patch to lower the gtk+ version needs to be dropped, it's just a local hack
and is unneeded in rawhide.
I looked at fixing the issue you pointed out, but only found occurrences of
RPM_BUILD_ROOT, no %{buildroot}, and no %optflags/RPM_OPT_FLAGS. Did I miss
something, or would you prefer that I use %{buildroot}?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 770152] Review Request: gnome-boxes - A simple GNOME 3 application to access remote or virtual systems

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770152

--- Comment #4 from Adam Huffman bl...@verdurin.com 2011-12-24 10:48:18 EST 
---
Yes, just for consistency with the other tags.  It's a minor thing but does
help readability.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 752311] Review Request: gitso - A front-end to reverse VNC connections

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=752311

--- Comment #2 from Cédric OLIVIER cedric.oliv...@free.fr 2011-12-24 11:15:24 
EST ---
Thanks a lot for your comments :

I have made an update :

SRPM URL :
http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/gitso-0.6-2/gitso-0.6-2.fc16.src.rpm
Spec URL : http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/gitso-0.6-2/gitso.spec

* I have removed python_sitelib_macro, and python-devel buildrequires and
python, wxGTK requires. SRPM successfully rebuild  with mock.

* Changing install destination.

* Removing MimeType was an error when removing deprecated entries in desktop
file.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 752311] Review Request: gitso - A front-end to reverse VNC connections

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=752311

--- Comment #3 from Cédric OLIVIER cedric.oliv...@free.fr 2011-12-24 13:00:07 
EST ---
Sorry, this previous version doesn't work.
You can find here a updated functional version : 

SRPM URL :
http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/gitso-0.6-3/gitso-0.6-3.fc16.src.rpm
Spec URL : http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/gitso-0.6-3/gitso.spec

* I have removed patch2, due to install directory change

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 751217] Review Request: drupal7-features_plumber - Remove unwanted components from your Drupal Features

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751217

Scott Dodson sdod...@sdodson.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #2 from Scott Dodson sdod...@sdodson.com 2011-12-24 13:41:37 EST 
---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: drupal7-features_plumber
Short Description: The Features Plumber UI module adds check boxes to the
feature create form, and un-checking these detected components will cause them
to be  removed from the actual generated export.
Owners: sdodson
Branches: fc15, fc16, el5, el6
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 745333] Review Request: drupal7-migrate - The migrate module provides a flexible framework for migrating content

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745333

Scott Dodson sdod...@sdodson.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #2 from Scott Dodson sdod...@sdodson.com 2011-12-24 13:43:03 EST 
---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: drupal7-migrate
Short Description: The migrate module provides a flexible framework for
migrating content into Drupal from other sources
Owners: sdodson
Branches: fc15, fc16, el5, el6
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 745328] Review Request: drupal7-menu_token - Menu Token provides tokens, that could be used in title or path

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745328

Scott Dodson sdod...@sdodson.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #2 from Scott Dodson sdod...@sdodson.com 2011-12-24 13:44:26 EST 
---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: drupal7-menu_token
Short Description: Menu Token module provides tokens, that could be used in
title or in path of menu items (links).
Owners: sdodson
Branches: fc15, fc16, el5, el6
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 745322] Review Request: drupal7-locale_cookie - Keeps track of the language by means of a cookie

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745322

Scott Dodson sdod...@sdodson.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 745323] Review Request: drupal7-markdown - Provides Markdown filter integration for Drupal input formats

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745323

Scott Dodson sdod...@sdodson.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #2 from Scott Dodson sdod...@sdodson.com 2011-12-24 13:45:50 EST 
---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: drupal7-markdown
Short Description: Provides Markdown filter integration for Drupal input
formats. The Markdown syntax is designed to co-exist with HTML, so you can set
up input formats with both HTML and Markdown support. It is also meant to be as
human-readable as possible when left as source.
Owners: sdodson
Branches: fc15, fc16, el5, el6
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 745322] Review Request: drupal7-locale_cookie - Keeps track of the language by means of a cookie

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745322

--- Comment #2 from Scott Dodson sdod...@sdodson.com 2011-12-24 13:47:24 EST 
---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: drupal7-locale_cookie
Short Description: This module adds a new method for language detection to
Drupal 7, it keeps track of the language by means of a cookie, so the language
is preserved no matter of the user is logged in or not. It also works for
recurring users.
Owners: sdodson
Branches: fc15, fc16, el5, el6
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 745320] Review Request: drupal7-libraries - The common denominator for all Drupal components and external libraries

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745320

Scott Dodson sdod...@sdodson.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #2 from Scott Dodson sdod...@sdodson.com 2011-12-24 13:49:44 EST 
---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: drupal7-libraries
Short Description: Drupal 7 only has built-in support for non-external
libraries via hook_library(). But it is only suitable for drupal.org projects
that bundle
their own library; i.e., the module author is the creator and vendor of the
library. Libraries API should be used for externally developed and distributed
libraries. A simple example would be a third-party jQuery plugin.
Owners: sdodson
Branches: fc15, fc16, el5, el6
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 745317] Review Request: drupal7-jquery_update - Updates the version of jQuery to 1.5.2 and jQuery UI 1.8.11

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745317

Scott Dodson sdod...@sdodson.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #2 from Scott Dodson sdod...@sdodson.com 2011-12-24 13:51:19 EST 
---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: drupal7-jquery_update
Short Description: Upgrades the version of jQuery in Drupal core to a newer
version of jQuery. Drupal 7 to jQuery 1.5.2 and jQuery UI 1.8.11
Owners: sdodson
Branches: fc15, fc16, el5, el6
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 768545] Review Request: blktap - blktap user space utilities

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768545

David Nalley da...@gnsa.us changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|needinfo?(da...@gnsa.us)|

--- Comment #2 from David Nalley da...@gnsa.us 2011-12-24 14:04:06 EST ---
Good catch - I took the spec file from upstream old release. 

The code (with one exception) is licensed under the three-clause BSD license,
and is noted at the beginning of each source file. 

There is a small section of code that is licensed LGPLv2+. 

I've changed the license section to reflect this. 

SPEC URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/blktap.spec
SRPM URL:
http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/blktap-2.0.90-2.git20111216.62de90d.fc16.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 709328] Review Request: psi-plus - Jabber client based on Qt

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709328

--- Comment #30 from Raphael Groner raph...@web.de 2011-12-24 15:33:59 EST ---
(In reply to comment #29)
(In reply to comment #28)
 What for is need libicu-devel?

The dependency to libicu is a (potential) bug in Qt package. Please take a look
at bug #759923 for more information.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 728815] Review Request: trademgen - C++ Simulated Travel Demand Generation Library

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728815

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|trademgen-0.2.2-1.fc16  |trademgen-0.2.2-1.fc15

--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-12-24 15:52:07 EST ---
trademgen-0.2.2-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 749756] Review Request: zita-at1 - autotuner for JACK

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749756

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|zita-at1-0.2.3-4.fc16   |zita-at1-0.2.3-4.fc15

--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-12-24 15:52:49 EST ---
zita-at1-0.2.3-4.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 728815] Review Request: trademgen - C++ Simulated Travel Demand Generation Library

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728815

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||trademgen-0.2.2-1.fc16
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2011-12-24 15:50:44

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-12-24 15:50:44 EST ---
trademgen-0.2.2-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 749753] Review Request: clxclient - a C++ X windows library

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749753

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|zita-rev1-0.2.1-4.fc16  |clxclient-3.6.1-5.fc15

--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-12-24 15:51:59 EST ---
clxclient-3.6.1-5.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 749757] Review Request: zita-rev1 - Proaudio reverb for JACK

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749757

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|zita-rev1-0.2.1-4.fc16  |zita-rev1-0.2.1-4.fc15

--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-12-24 15:53:01 EST ---
zita-rev1-0.2.1-4.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 769922] Review Request: trac-navadd-plugin - Allows the addition of custom items

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769922

Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com 2011-12-24 16:49:37 EST ---

OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name. 
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. 
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. 
OK - License (BSD)
OK - License field in spec matches
See below - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. 
OK - Package has a correct %clean section. 
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content. 
OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install

OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. 
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. 
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. 
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. 
OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions)
See below - No rpmlint output. 
OK - final provides and requires are sane.

SHOULD Items:

OK - Should build in mock. 
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should function as described. 
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version
OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or
/usr/sbin

Issues: 

1. Not a blocker, but you might ask upstream to include a copy of the BSD
license with the package. 

2. rpmlint says: 
trac-navadd-plugin.noarch: W: no-documentation
trac-navadd-plugin.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
trac-navadd-plugin-0.9.svn11020.tar.gz

Both can be ignored. 

I don't see any blockers here, so this package is APPROVED. 
I'm happy to co-maintain if you like.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 770134] Review Request: trac-workflowadmin-plugin - Web interface for workflow administration for Trac

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770134

Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com 2011-12-24 17:08:14 EST ---

OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name. 
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. 
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. 
OK - License (BSD)
OK - License field in spec matches
See below - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. 
OK - Package has a correct %clean section. 
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content. 
OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install

OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. 
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. 
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. 
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. 
OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions)
See below - No rpmlint output. 
OK - final provides and requires are sane.

SHOULD Items:

OK - Should build in mock. 
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should function as described. 
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version
OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or
/usr/sbin

Issues: 

1. Not a blocker, but you might ask upstream to include a copy of the BSD
license with the package. 

2. rpmlint says: 
trac-workflowadmin-plugin.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) workflow -
work flow, work-flow, workforce
trac-workflowadmin-plugin.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
workflow - work flow, work-flow, workforce
trac-workflowadmin-plugin.noarch: W: no-documentation
trac-workflowadmin-plugin.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) workflow -
work flow, work-flow, workforce
trac-workflowadmin-plugin.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US workflow
- work flow, work-flow, workforce
trac-workflowadmin-plugin.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
trac-workflowadmin-plugin-0.12.svn11020.tar.gz

all can be ignored. 

I don't see any blockers here, so this package is APPROVED. 
Happy to co-maintain.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 694479] Review Request: pcl - Library for point cloud processing

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694479

Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|richmat...@gmail.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 694479] Review Request: pcl - Library for point cloud processing

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694479

Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|richmat...@gmail.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 694479] Review Request: pcl - Library for point cloud processing

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694479

Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #10 from Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com 2011-12-24 17:17:27 EST 
---
I've reviewed and tested your changes.  The documentation packaging issue and
specfile comments are taken care of, and the pending openni update+buildroot
override take care of the primary arch build requirement. With these changes,
this package is APPROVED.  Happy holidays to you too!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 694479] Review Request: pcl - Library for point cloud processing

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694479

Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #10 from Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com 2011-12-24 17:17:27 EST 
---
I've reviewed and tested your changes.  The documentation packaging issue and
specfile comments are taken care of, and the pending openni update+buildroot
override take care of the primary arch build requirement. With these changes,
this package is APPROVED.  Happy holidays to you too!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 699316] Review Request: inkscape-textext - Textext is an extension for Inkscape that allows adding LaTeX-generated editable text objects to the SVG drawings

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699316

--- Comment #4 from Willington Vega wv...@wvega.com 2011-12-24 17:42:40 EST 
---
Hi Ryan, thank you for your feedback.

Here are the outputs from rpmlint -v for the latest SPEC file and SRPM (comment
2):

rpmlint -v SPECS/inkscape-textext.spec 
SPECS/inkscape-textext.spec: I: checking-url
https://bitbucket.org/pv/textext/get/9260a2461344.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds)
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

rpmlint -v SRPMS/inkscape-textext-0.4.4-2.20091127hg.fc15.src.rpm 
inkscape-textext.src: I: checking
inkscape-textext.src: I: checking-url http://pav.iki.fi/software/textext/
(timeout 10 seconds)
inkscape-textext.src: I: checking-url
https://bitbucket.org/pv/textext/get/9260a2461344.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds)
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

And here is the link to Koji scratch build:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3604835

I've been reading those wiki pages lately while doing some informal reviews.
I'm still learning though. Links to informal reviews:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757156#c1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769096#c1

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 699316] Review Request: inkscape-textext - Textext is an extension for Inkscape that allows adding LaTeX-generated editable text objects to the SVG drawings

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699316

Mohamed El Morabity pikachu.2...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pikachu.2...@gmail.com

--- Comment #5 from Mohamed El Morabity pikachu.2...@gmail.com 2011-12-24 
18:04:20 EST ---
Some comments:

- About the Requires: don't rely on texlive-latex, but rather on
tex(latex), as explained here:
  
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks#Installing_TeX_files_.28unvetted.29
If one day Fedora decides to switch to another (La)TeX distribution (it already
happened once, from teTeX to TeXLive), there will be no need to fix the
Requires on TeX tools, thanks to this virtual Provides.

- There's an extra underscore after Inkscape in the description.

- You can remove the BuildRoot tag, as well as all build root cleaning stuff.
You can also remove the %defattr macro in  %files:
   http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
   http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25clean
   http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_Permissions

- There is a stable version 0.4.4, but you packaged a developement version one.
Could you justify your choice?

- You can remove python-lxml from the Requires, it is already required by
inkscape.

- About this line:
   %attr(644,root,root) %{_datadir}/inkscape/extensions/textext.inx
If you need to fix the rights of some installed file, you'd better using the
install in %install: you can use the following line instead of cp:
   install -pm 0644 textext.py %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/inkscape/extensions/

- Don't forget to set the Group tag for this package. You can use the same than
inkscape, that is to say:
   Group:   Applications/Productivity

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 699316] Review Request: inkscape-textext - Textext is an extension for Inkscape that allows adding LaTeX-generated editable text objects to the SVG drawings

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699316

--- Comment #6 from Ryan H. Lewis (rhl) m...@ryanlewis.net 2011-12-24 
20:59:22 EST ---
Hi, sorry, please rpmlint -v the actual rpm.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 747765] Review Request: apache-log4j-extras - Apache Extras Companion for Apache log4j

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747765

--- Comment #4 from David Nalley da...@gnsa.us 2011-12-24 22:53:50 EST ---
I've moved to maven (and I am reminded how much I dislike (and don't grok)
maven). 

A couple of notes - currently this only builds in rawhide - and given that this
is a dependency for something that I am intending including in F17 only, that
works for me. 

SPEC URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/apache-log4j-extras.spec
SRPM URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/apache-log4j-extras-1.1-3.fc16.src.rpm

Here's a koji scratch build: 
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3604922

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 745320] Review Request: drupal7-libraries - The common denominator for all Drupal components and external libraries

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745320

--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2011-12-24 23:20:07 EST 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 745317] Review Request: drupal7-jquery_update - Updates the version of jQuery to 1.5.2 and jQuery UI 1.8.11

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745317

--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2011-12-24 23:19:29 EST 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

f15 and f16, not fc15 and fc16.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 745323] Review Request: drupal7-markdown - Provides Markdown filter integration for Drupal input formats

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745323

--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2011-12-24 23:21:35 EST 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 745328] Review Request: drupal7-menu_token - Menu Token provides tokens, that could be used in title or path

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745328

--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2011-12-24 23:22:10 EST 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 751217] Review Request: drupal7-features_plumber - Remove unwanted components from your Drupal Features

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751217

--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2011-12-24 23:24:13 EST 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 745333] Review Request: drupal7-migrate - The migrate module provides a flexible framework for migrating content

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745333

--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2011-12-24 23:23:29 EST 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 745322] Review Request: drupal7-locale_cookie - Keeps track of the language by means of a cookie

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745322

--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2011-12-24 23:20:43 EST 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 699316] Review Request: inkscape-textext - Textext is an extension for Inkscape that allows adding LaTeX-generated editable text objects to the SVG drawings

2011-12-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699316

--- Comment #7 from Willington Vega wv...@wvega.com 2011-12-25 00:03:22 EST 
---
Hello Mohamed, thank you for your comments. I applied the changes you suggested
and created new SPEC, SRPM and RPM.

http://files.wvega.com/fedora/inkscape-textext/inkscape-textext.spec
http://files.wvega.com/fedora/inkscape-textext/inkscape-textext-0.4.4-3.20091127hg.fc15.src.rpm

previous SPEC file can be found at:

http://files.wvega.com/fedora/inkscape-textext/inkscape-textext-0.4.4-2.spec


(In reply to comment #5)
 - There is a stable version 0.4.4, but you packaged a developement version 
 one.
 Could you justify your choice?

The snapshot from 2009-11-27 is the version I started using and inspired me to
create the package. The stable version 0.4.4 was released about a year before,
on 2008-10-04, and I honestly never tested it because the development version
just worked. I thought it would be good to include the latest changes in the
package, which seems to add some fixes.

I can start testing the stable version and see how it works if that's a better
approach.


(In reply to comment #6)
 Hi, sorry, please rpmlint -v the actual rpm.

Below is koji scratch build info and the rpmlint -v output for the updated
SPEC, SRPM and RPM:

Koji task:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3604960

rpmlint output:

rpmlint -v SPECS/inkscape-textext.spec 
SPECS/inkscape-textext.spec: I: checking-url
https://bitbucket.org/pv/textext/get/9260a2461344.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds)
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

rpmlint -v SRPMS/inkscape-textext-0.4.4-3.20091127hg.fc15.src.rpm 
inkscape-textext.src: I: checking
inkscape-textext.src: I: checking-url http://pav.iki.fi/software/textext/
(timeout 10 seconds)
inkscape-textext.src: I: checking-url
https://bitbucket.org/pv/textext/get/9260a2461344.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds)
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

rpmlint -v RPMS/noarch/inkscape-textext-0.4.4-3.20091127hg.fc15.noarch.rpm 
inkscape-textext.noarch: I: checking
inkscape-textext.noarch: I: checking-url http://pav.iki.fi/software/textext/
(timeout 10 seconds)
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Thank you all.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review