[Bug 672221] Review Request: sqlite3-dbf - Converter of XBase / FoxPro tables to SQLite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672221 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672221] Review Request: sqlite3-dbf - Converter of XBase / FoxPro tables to SQLite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672221 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-02-11 04:40:35 EST --- sqlite3-dbf-2011.01.24-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sqlite3-dbf-2011.01.24-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672221] Review Request: sqlite3-dbf - Converter of XBase / FoxPro tables to SQLite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672221 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-02-11 04:51:55 EST --- sqlite3-dbf-2011.01.24-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sqlite3-dbf-2011.01.24-1.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672221] Review Request: sqlite3-dbf - Converter of XBase / FoxPro tables to SQLite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672221 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-02-11 05:01:04 EST --- sqlite3-dbf-2011.01.24-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sqlite3-dbf-2011.01.24-1.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 788990] Reivew Request: perl-OpenOffice-UNO - Interface to OpenOffice's UNO run-time
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788990 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2012-02-11 05:08:42 EST --- The sdkenv issue is fixed in new packages, the other issue is a bug in util-linux and give it's rawhide I'm not doing anything to work around it at this point. It seems fixed upstream: http://git.kernel.org/?p=utils/util-linux/util-linux.git;a=commit;h=37305c65e7e58ac44b7de60a84908716ab887483 SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-OpenOffice-UNO.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-2.el6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 787128] Review Request: libfep - Library to implement FEP (front end processor) on ANSI terminals
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787128 Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org 2012-02-11 05:33:01 EST --- These changes look good, so this package is APPROVED. (Thanks again to Jamie for the review.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664221] Review Request: ghc-cautious-file - Provides ways to write a file cautiously
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664221 --- Comment #6 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com 2012-02-11 05:40:11 EST --- SPEC file: http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-cautious-file.spec SRPM http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-cautious-file-1.0-1.fc16.src.rpm rpmlint output: rpmlint -i *.rpm ghc-cautious-file.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix - posit The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-cautious-file.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix - posit The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-cautious-file-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix - posit The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 787128] Review Request: libfep - Library to implement FEP (front end processor) on ANSI terminals
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787128 Daiki Ueno du...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Daiki Ueno du...@redhat.com 2012-02-11 06:47:23 EST --- Thanks, Ian and Jamie. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: libfep Short Description: Library to implement FEP (front end processor) on ANSI terminals Owners: ueno Branches: f17 f16 f15 InitialCC: i18n-team -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 784958] Review Request: ktp-text-ui - Telepathy text chat handler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784958 --- Comment #26 from nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com 2012-02-11 08:08:33 EST --- $ iconv -l | grep -i mac CSISO111ECMACYRILLIC// CSMACINTOSH// ECMACYRILLIC// MAC-CENTRALEUROPE// MAC-CYRILLIC// MAC-IS// MAC-SAMI// MAC-UK// MAC// MACCYRILLIC// MACINTOSH// MACIS// MACUK// MACUKRAINIAN// MS-MAC-CYRILLIC// I tried to convert to UTF-8 from all of this encodings but no one gives readable characters. The only non UTF-8 characters there: Renkoo�6�3, U.S.C. �0�30��0���0�3. There is answer from adium theme developer: http://adium.im/pipermail/devel_adium.im/2012-February/008869.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 770283] Review Request: uptimed - A daemon to record and keep track of system up times
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770283 --- Comment #30 from Tomasz Torcz zdzi...@irc.pl 2012-02-11 09:29:29 EST --- I removed bundled getopt, both files and mention in configure.ac Spec URL: http://ttorcz.fedorapeople.org/uptimed.spec SRPM URL: http://ttorcz.fedorapeople.org/uptimed-0.3.16-9.fc16.src.rpm Scratch : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3781973 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 784958] Review Request: ktp-text-ui - Telepathy text chat handler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784958 --- Comment #27 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2012-02-11 10:07:10 EST --- I think that if in Renkoo LICENSE.txt, instead of or in addition to this vague statement: The fading javascript is not covered in this license. The code is fadomatic and is covered under its own license as set by its author. an actual copy of the copyright and license header of: https://github.com/phl/Fadomatic/blob/master/fadomatic.js was inserted, that should be enough to solve the issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 784958] Review Request: ktp-text-ui - Telepathy text chat handler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784958 --- Comment #28 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2012-02-11 10:28:46 EST --- As for the non-UTF-8 characters: * The first one after Renkoo appears to be the ℠ (U+2120 / SM / Service Mark) character encoded in the Chinese GB18030 encoding. (It is autodetected as such by KWrite, and the statement Renkoo is a service mark of Renkoo, Inc. below the license is supportive of this interpretation.) (Note that the character doesn't appear to be rendered correctly in the font used in this Bugzilla. It should be a superscript SM similar to the well-known ™ (TM) sign.) * The second sequence was apparently mangled by improper character set conversion, but thankfully this is part of the text of the Academic Free License version 2.1. The text should read 17 U.S.C. § 101 et seq., i.e. the U.S. Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 101 et seq., the equivalent laws of other countries. (It looks like a lot of garbage was produced by repeated misconversion of the § sign (U+00A7 / section/paragraph sign).) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 784958] Review Request: ktp-text-ui - Telepathy text chat handler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784958 --- Comment #29 from nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com 2012-02-11 10:37:09 EST --- SM can be fixed with iconv -f GB18030 -t UTF-8 Renkoo\ LICENSE.txt but what to do with garbage? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 784958] Review Request: ktp-text-ui - Telepathy text chat handler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784958 --- Comment #30 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2012-02-11 10:40:57 EST --- (Looks like the ℠ sign is displayed correctly when viewing the Bugzilla comment, but not when typing it.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 784958] Review Request: ktp-text-ui - Telepathy text chat handler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784958 --- Comment #31 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2012-02-11 10:41:45 EST --- Patch the file and get upstream to fix it. It needs to be edited anyway to add the Fadomatic license instead of that vague reference. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 487913] Review Request: culmus-fancy-fonts - Fancy fonts for Hebrew
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487913 --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2012-02-11 10:47:50 EST --- (In reply to comment #13) I don't see myself taking over these fonts, as I have hardly any idea how to create an RPM :( There is little technical difficulty in creating/maintaining a font package in Fedora nowadays, the process is documented and the guidelines clear (I think). Do take a look at them they're not complex However, it does require some time investment from the packager, and this is why packages like culmus languish, if their packager is busy elsewhere -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 784958] Review Request: ktp-text-ui - Telepathy text chat handler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784958 --- Comment #35 from nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com 2012-02-11 11:05:25 EST --- And ℠ again broken :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 784958] Review Request: ktp-text-ui - Telepathy text chat handler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784958 --- Comment #33 from nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com 2012-02-11 11:04:04 EST --- This is strange - I added § but in patch § - how it should be? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 784958] Review Request: ktp-text-ui - Telepathy text chat handler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784958 --- Comment #34 from nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com 2012-02-11 11:05:09 EST --- And § again broken :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 784958] Review Request: ktp-text-ui - Telepathy text chat handler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784958 --- Comment #32 from nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com 2012-02-11 11:01:56 EST --- Created attachment 561105 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=561105 patch for Renkoo LICENSE.txt Fixes ℠, § and adds text of fadomatic license. Should be applied after mac2unix converting. Is this patch enough? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 784958] Review Request: ktp-text-ui - Telepathy text chat handler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784958 nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #561105|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #36 from nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com 2012-02-11 11:12:27 EST --- Created attachment 561108 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=561108 second try So now it resolves all issues? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 784958] Review Request: ktp-text-ui - Telepathy text chat handler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784958 --- Comment #37 from nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com 2012-02-11 11:14:08 EST --- After patching: $ file Renkoo\ LICENSE.txt Renkoo LICENSE.txt: UTF-8 Unicode English text, with very long lines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 784958] Review Request: ktp-text-ui - Telepathy text chat handler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784958 --- Comment #38 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2012-02-11 11:17:26 EST --- Since that license file needs so much fixing, maybe just include a fixed version as a separate Source, and send that upstream for them to use too. Anyway, its largely cosmetic, let's fix it after review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 784958] Review Request: ktp-text-ui - Telepathy text chat handler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784958 --- Comment #39 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2012-02-11 11:20:01 EST --- Yes, with those changes, it looks OK to me. Please also send this upstream. (The ordering is a bit suboptimal, but I'm not sure what the clearest ordering of the paragraphs and licenses is.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 784958] Review Request: ktp-text-ui - Telepathy text chat handler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784958 --- Comment #40 from nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com 2012-02-11 11:46:30 EST --- (In reply to comment #39) Please also send this upstream. Sent. http://adium.im/pipermail/devel_adium.im/2012-February/008883.html http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-telepathy/2012-February/005444.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 770283] Review Request: uptimed - A daemon to record and keep track of system up times
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770283 Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 789599] New: Review Request: istack-commons - Common code for some Glassfish projects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: istack-commons - Common code for some Glassfish projects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789599 Summary: Review Request: istack-commons - Common code for some Glassfish projects Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: juan.hernan...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://www.xente.mundo-r.com/304027W0001/rpms/istack-commons.spec SRPM URL: http://www.xente.mundo-r.com/304027W0001/rpms/istack-commons-2.6.1-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Code shared between JAXP, JAXB, SAAJ, and JAX-WS projects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 789602] New: Review Request: codemodel - Java library for code generators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: codemodel - Java library for code generators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789602 Summary: Review Request: codemodel - Java library for code generators Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: juan.hernan...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://www.xente.mundo-r.com/304027W0001/rpms/codemodel.spec SRPM URL: http://www.xente.mundo-r.com/304027W0001/rpms/codemodel-2.6-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: CodeModel is a Java library for code generators; it provides a way to generate Java programs in a way much nicer than PrintStream.println(). This project is a spin-off from the JAXB RI for its schema compiler to generate Java source files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 789604] New: Review Request: jsr-311 - JAX-RS: Java API for RESTful Web Services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jsr-311 - JAX-RS: Java API for RESTful Web Services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789604 Summary: Review Request: jsr-311 - JAX-RS: Java API for RESTful Web Services Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: juan.hernan...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://www.xente.mundo-r.com/304027W0001/rpms/jsr-311.spec SRPM URL: http://www.xente.mundo-r.com/304027W0001/rpms/jsr-311-1.1.1-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: JAX-RS: Java API for RESTful Web Services -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 789602] Review Request: codemodel - Java library for code generators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789602 Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||789599 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 789599] Review Request: istack-commons - Common code for some Glassfish projects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789599 Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||789602 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 789604] Review Request: jsr-311 - JAX-RS: Java API for RESTful Web Services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789604 Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||789611 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 789611] Review Request: jackson - Jackson Java JSON-processor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789611 Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||789604 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 789611] New: Review Request: jackson - Jackson Java JSON-processor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jackson - Jackson Java JSON-processor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789611 Summary: Review Request: jackson - Jackson Java JSON-processor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: juan.hernan...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://www.xente.mundo-r.com/304027W0001/rpms/jackson.spec SRPM URL: http://www.xente.mundo-r.com/304027W0001/rpms/jackson-1.6.3-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: JSON processor (JSON parser + JSON generator) written in Java. Beyond basic JSON reading/writing (parsing, generating), it also offers full node-based Tree Model, as well as full OJM (Object/Json Mapper) data binding functionality. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652034] Review Request: python-apipkg - Python namespace control and lazy-import mechanism
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652034 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-02-11 13:56:01 EST --- Package python-apipkg-1.0-1.el6: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=epel-testing python-apipkg-1.0-1.el6' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-0429/python-apipkg-1.0-1.el6 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672221] Review Request: sqlite3-dbf - Converter of XBase / FoxPro tables to SQLite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672221 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-02-11 13:56:22 EST --- sqlite3-dbf-2011.01.24-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 789615] Review Request: apache-sshd - Apache SSHD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789615 Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||789614 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 789615] New: Review Request: apache-sshd - Apache SSHD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: apache-sshd - Apache SSHD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789615 Summary: Review Request: apache-sshd - Apache SSHD Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: juan.hernan...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://www.xente.mundo-r.com/304027W0001/rpms/apache-sshd.spec SRPM URL: http://www.xente.mundo-r.com/304027W0001/rpms/apache-sshd-0.6.0-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Apache SSHD is a 100% pure java library to support the SSH protocols on both the client and server side. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672395] Review Request: eigen3 - A lightweight C++ template library for vector and matrix math
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672395 --- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-02-11 14:34:57 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 787128] Review Request: libfep - Library to implement FEP (front end processor) on ANSI terminals
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787128 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-02-11 14:38:16 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 784952] Review Request: ktp-filetransfer-handler - Telepathy file transfer handler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784952 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-02-11 14:36:03 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Added f17. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 784958] Review Request: ktp-text-ui - Telepathy text chat handler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784958 --- Comment #41 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-02-11 14:37:45 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Added f17. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 788815] Review Request: python-ZSI - python Zolera Soap Infrastructure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788815 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-02-11 14:40:35 EST --- Unretired devel. Please take ownership, then submit a Package Change SCM request to create f17. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 784954] Review Request: ktp-kded-integration-module - KDE integration for telepathy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784954
nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com 2012-02-11 14:42:12 EST ---
MUST Items:
+ rpmlint output
$ rpmlint ktp-kded-integration-module-0.3.0-3.fc16.i686.rpm
ktp-kded-integration-module-0.3.0-3.fc16.src.rpm
ktp-kded-integration-module-debuginfo-0.3.0-3.fc16.i686.rpm
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
+ named and versioned according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
Package name match the upstream tarball name
ktp-kded-integration-module-0.3.0.tar.bz2
+ spec file name ktp-kded-integration-module.spec matches base package name
+ complies with all the legal guidelines:
+ License: LGPLv2+ valid, matches actual license
+ No known patent problems
+ No emulator, no firmware, no binary-only or prebuilt components
+ COPYING (GNU LESSER GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE Version 2.1) packaged as %doc
+ source matches upstream:
MD5: 7c37771ab05c4f5c3d9fd710f3a87c27
ktp-kded-integration-module-0.3.0.tar.bz2
SHA1: df916620c12dba8041669f36ca06c5b97781b4a7
ktp-kded-integration-module-0.3.0.tar.bz2
SHA256: 5569022772147f984b50147c7504df62b38ac30f4046d85124aa6d56f46c87dc
ktp-kded-integration-module-0.3.0.tar.bz2
+ builds on at least one arch
build from mock is in F16 kde-unstable repo
+ no known non-working arches, so no ExcludeArch needed
+ no missing BuildRequires (builds in mock)
+ locales are handled properly by using %find_lang %{name} --all-name
--with-kde macro
+ ldconfig call not needed (no shared libraries in dynamic linker's default
paths)
+ no duplicated system libraries
+ package not relocatable (no Prefix tag)
+ directory ownership correct (doesn't own directories owned by another
package, owns all package-specific directories)
+ no duplicate files in %files
+ permissions correct, %defattr(-,root,root,-) not needed now, executables have
executable permissions
+ macros used where possible (%{name}, %{version}, %{buildroot},
%{_kde4_version}, %{_target_platform}, %{cmake_kde4}, %{_kde4_libdir},
%{_kde4_datadir})
+ no non-code content (only binary and desktop files)
+ no large documentation files, so no -doc package needed
+ no %doc files required at runtime
+ no header files which would need to be in a -devel subpackage
+ no static libraries, so no -static package needed
+ no devel symlinks which would need to be in a -devel subpackage
+ devel packages must require the base package (no -devel package)
+ no .la files
+ no .desktop file needed in /usr/share/applications for this KDE Telepathy
internal module
+ desktop-file-validate call not needed for service type desktop files
+ all filenames are valid UTF-8
+ other packaging guidelines:
+ complies with the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard (all files in
%{_kde4_libdir} and %{_kde4_datadir})
+ proper changelog, tags, BuildRequires, Summary, Description, Obsoletes,
Provides, URL, Source0
+ no non-UTF-8 characters
+ all relevant documentation included as %doc (COPYING)
+ RPM_OPT_FLAGS are used in %{cmake_kde4} macro
+ debuginfo package is valid (contains stripped symbols from ELF binary and
source code related to it)
+ no rpaths (no check-rpaths error)
+ no configuration files, so %config guideline doesn't apply
+ no init scripts, so init script guideline doesn't apply
+ timestamps are preserved
+ %{?_smp_mflags} used
+ not a web application, so web application guideline doesn't apply
+ no conflicts
SHOULD Items:
+ license already included upstream
+ no translations for description and summary provided by upstream
+ package builds in mock (built for kde-unstable)
- successfully tested the package functionality (no testing yet)
+ scriptlets are sane (no scriptlets needed)
+ subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully
versioned dependency (no subpackages)
+ no .pc files, so placement of .pc files is irrelevant
+ no file dependencies
+ no binaries/scripts that needs man pages
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 788815] Review Request: python-ZSI - python Zolera Soap Infrastructure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788815 --- Comment #11 from Tim Fenn tim.f...@gmail.com 2012-02-11 15:47:35 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: python-ZSI New Branches: f17 Owners: timfenn ownership change done! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 769919] Review Request: hydra - Very fast network log-on cracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769919 --- Comment #5 from Athmane Madjoudj athma...@gmail.com 2012-02-11 15:47:32 EST --- New upstream release (7.2): Spec URL: http://athmane.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hydra.spec SRPM URL: http://athmane.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hydra-7.2-1.fc16.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3783373 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 789614] Review Request: apache-mina - Apache MINA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789614 Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nott...@redhat.com, ||package-review@lists.fedora ||project.org Component|oz |Package Review AssignedTo|clalance...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 786054] Review Request: python-django-nose - Django test runner that uses nose
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786054 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-django-nose-0.1.3-1. ||fc16 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2012-02-11 16:54:37 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-02-11 16:54:37 EST --- python-django-nose-0.1.3-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 784239] Review Request: python-django-debug-toolbar - Configurable set of panels that display various debug information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784239 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-django-debug-toolbar ||-0.9.3-1.fc16 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2012-02-11 16:56:51 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-02-11 16:56:51 EST --- python-django-debug-toolbar-0.9.3-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 784954] Review Request: ktp-kded-integration-module - KDE integration for telepathy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784954 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2012-02-11 17:28:51 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ktp-kded-integration-module Short Description: KDE integration for telepathy Owners: jreznik rdieter Branches: f17 f16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 787858] Review Request: bashmount - a menu-driven bash script for mounting removable media
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787858 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-02-11 17:02:26 EST --- bashmount-1.6.2-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 769919] Review Request: hydra - Very fast network log-on cracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769919 Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #6 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at 2012-02-11 17:42:38 EST --- Just a couple of comments: As MySQL 4 seemingly doesn't work, consider to remove MySQL from the description. Do you leave out support for Firebird for a reason? Looking at the build, the optflags aren't actually used. Please remove The hydra package must be installed before installing the hydra front end., as dependency resolution takes care of that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 782957] Review Request: musca - A simple dynamic window manager fox X
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782957 Damien Durand splinu...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Damien Durand splinu...@gmail.com 2012-02-11 17:45:45 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: musca Short A simple dynamic window manager fox X Owners: splinux Branches: f16 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 773485] Review Request: ibutils - InfiniBand fabric management utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=773485 Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||loganje...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|loganje...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com 2012-02-11 18:16:35 EST --- I will take this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 769919] Review Request: hydra - Very fast network log-on cracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769919 --- Comment #7 from Athmane Madjoudj athma...@gmail.com 2012-02-11 18:18:09 EST --- Thanks for your comments, (In reply to comment #6) Just a couple of comments: As MySQL 4 seemingly doesn't work, consider to remove MySQL from the description. Fixed, removed the protocols list since it's in constant change. Do you leave out support for Firebird for a reason? Fixed, added support for Firebird Looking at the build, the optflags aren't actually used. Yes they are not used, I can ask upstream to use CFLAGS if it's necessary. Please remove The hydra package must be installed before installing the hydra front end., as dependency resolution takes care of that. Fixed New URLs: Spec URL: http://athmane.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hydra.spec SRPM URL: http://athmane.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hydra-7.2-2.fc16.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 789255] Review Request: ebumeter - Loudness measurement according to EBU-R128
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789255 Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #1 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at 2012-02-11 18:21:57 EST --- http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/ebumeter-0.1.0-2.fc16.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 789255] Review Request: ebumeter - Loudness measurement according to EBU-R128
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789255 Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||788718 --- Comment #2 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at 2012-02-11 18:30:36 EST --- License is GPLv2+, according to the code. As you ship the desktop file as a separate source, I suggest not to modify it in the specfile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 788718] Review Request: clalsadrv - An ALSA driver C++ library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788718 Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||789255 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 769919] Review Request: hydra - Very fast network log-on cracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769919 --- Comment #8 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at 2012-02-11 18:42:47 EST --- Please use the compiler flags from the rpm configuration. Asking upstream to include it wouldn't hurt though, I guess. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Compiler_flags -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 786636] Review Request: rubygem-unicorn - Rack HTTP server for fast clients and Unix
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786636 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@zarb.org --- Comment #1 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org 2012-02-11 18:52:37 EST --- The package doesn't seems to build in rawhide : ruby(abi) = 1.8 cannot be found. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 769919] Review Request: hydra - Very fast network log-on cracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769919 --- Comment #9 from Athmane Madjoudj athma...@gmail.com 2012-02-11 19:22:09 EST --- (In reply to comment #8) Please use the compiler flags from the rpm configuration. Asking upstream to include it wouldn't hurt though, I guess. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Compiler_flags I've added a workaround to force CFLAGS: Spec URL: http://athmane.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hydra.spec SRPM URL: http://athmane.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hydra-7.2-3.fc16.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 769919] Review Request: hydra - Very fast network log-on cracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769919 --- Comment #10 from Athmane Madjoudj athma...@gmail.com 2012-02-11 19:29:00 EST --- Koji scratch build (to check CFLAGS and Firebird support): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3783454 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 773485] Review Request: ibutils - InfiniBand fabric management utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=773485 --- Comment #6 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com 2012-02-11 19:51:12 EST --- +: OK -: must be fixed =: should be fixed (at your discretion) ?: I have a question N: not applicable MUST: [=] rpmlint output: I ran rpmlint on the installed packages, not on the binary RPMs, as that enables some more checks ibutils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ibnlparse ibutils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dump2psl.pl ibutils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dump2slvl.pl ibutils-libs.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libibmscli.so.1.0.0 pthread_cancel ibutils-libs.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libibmscli.so.1.0.0 pthread_create ibutils-libs.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libibmscli.so.1.0.0 pthread_cancel ibutils-libs.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libibmscli.so.1.0.0 pthread_detach ibutils-libs.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libibmscli.so.1.0.0 linux-vdso.so.1 ibutils-libs.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libibmscli.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libm.so.6 ibutils-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libibmscli.so.1.0.0 exit@GLIBC_2.2.5 ibutils-libs.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libibsysapi.so.1.0.0 linux-vdso.so.1 ibutils-libs.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libibsysapi.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libm.so.6 ibutils-libs.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libibdm.so.1.1.1 linux-vdso.so.1 ibutils-libs.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libibdm.so.1.1.1 /lib64/libdl.so.2 ibutils-libs.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libibdm.so.1.1.1 /lib64/libm.so.6 ibutils-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libibdm.so.1.1.1 exit@GLIBC_2.2.5 ibutils-libs.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libibdmcom.so.1.1.1 linux-vdso.so.1 ibutils-libs.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libibdmcom.so.1.1.1 /lib64/libm.so.6 ibutils-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libibdmcom.so.1.1.1 exit@GLIBC_2.2.5 ibutils-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation ibutils-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 21 warnings. So libibmscli.so should be linked with -lpthread, and there is unnecessary linkage. The latter can be solved by adding -Wl,--as-needed to LDFLAGS. Also, please ask upstream about eliminating calls to exit() in the shared libraries. [+] follows package naming guidelines [+] spec file base name matches package name [+] package meets the packaging guidelines [+] package uses a Fedora approved license [+] license field matches the actual license [-] license file is included in %doc: it is, but in the main package. It should be in the -libs package instead, since that can be installed without the main package. [+] spec file is in American English [+] spec file is legible [+] sources match upstream: md5sum is 82c7e95508f38caec4e8b8b5437598e0 for both [+] package builds on at least one primary arch (tried x86_64) [?] appropriate use of ExcludeArch: what is the reason for the ExclusiveArch? [+] all build requirements in BuildRequires [N] spec file handles locales properly [+] ldconfig in %post and %postun [+] no bundled copies of system libraries [+] no relocatable packages [+] package owns all directories that it creates [+] no files listed twice in %files [+] proper permissions on files [+] consistent use of macros [+] code or permissible content [N] large documentation in -doc [+] no runtime dependencies in %doc [+] header files in -devel [-] static libraries in -static: the static libraries are in -libs [+] .so in -devel [+] -devel requires main package [+] package contains no libtool archives [N] package contains a desktop file, uses desktop-file-install [+] package does not own files/dirs owned by other packages [+] all filenames in UTF-8 SHOULD: [N] query upstream for license text [N] description and summary contain available translations [+] package builds in mock: tried fedora-rawhide-i386 [+] package builds on all supported arches: tried i386 and x86_64 [?] package functions as described: don't know how to test [+] sane scriptlets [+] subpackages require the main package [N] placement of pkgconfig files [N] file dependencies versus package dependencies [=] package contains man pages for binaries/scripts: yes, except for the 3 that rpmlint complained about -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 723752] Review Request: lrslib - Reverse search for vertex enumeration/convex hull problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723752 --- Comment #10 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com 2012-02-11 20:05:31 EST --- OK, I understand your reasoning. Where the upstream name already has lib in it, would you be happy with lrslib containing the libraries, and lrslib-utils containing the binaries? If so, I'll make it happen. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 789660] Review Request : xcftools - Command-line tools for extracting information from XCF files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789660 --- Comment #1 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com 2012-02-12 00:07:42 EST --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3783488 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 789660] New: Review Request : xcftools - Command-line tools for extracting information from XCF files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request : xcftools - Command-line tools for extracting information from XCF files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789660 Summary: Review Request : xcftools - Command-line tools for extracting information from XCF files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- SRPM link: http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/xcftools-1.0.7-3.fc16.src.rpm Spec file link http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/xcftools.spec rpmlint output: rpmlint -i xcftools-1.0.7-3.fc16.x86_64.rpm xcftools-debuginfo-1.0.7-3.fc16.x86_64.rpm xcftools-1.0.7-3.fc16.src.rpm ../xcftools.spec 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Required for phatch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
