[Bug 789360] Review Request: rfcdiff - Compares two internet draft files and outputs the difference
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789360 Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||mru...@matthias-runge.de Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de 2012-02-12 04:17:58 EST --- I'll take this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 738556] Review Request: gogoc - IPv6 TSP client for gogo6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738556
--- Comment #16 from shrek-m shre...@gmx.de 2012-02-12 05:24:22 EST ---
OUTSCH!
i launched gogoc several times with -n and got different german infos,
errors, warnings, ...
i assume that you can get rid of some patches if you change the linux.sh to
LANG=C
with LANG=C instead LANGUAGE=C all is ok, even the CAP_SYS_MODULE
(deprecated). are gone away.propably if [ ! -z $PID ]; then is ok now.
within a few seconds it should be:
with LANG=C
# /usr/local/gogoc/bin/gogoc -f /usr/local/gogoc/bin/gogoc.conf -n
gogoCLIENT v1.2-RELEASE build Feb 8 2012-00:55:23
Built on ///Linux srv01.localdomain 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.i686 #1 SMP Mon Jan 23
17:25:22 CST 2012 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux///
Your IPv6 address is xx
Your IPv6 prefix is xxx
Your IPv6 DNS address is x
^C
/
original linux.sh from source
# head -20 /usr/local/gogoc/template/linux.sh
#!/bin/sh
#
# $Id: linux.sh,v 1.3 2010/03/07 19:31:17 carl Exp $
#
# This source code copyright (c) gogo6 Inc. 2002-2006.
#
# For license information refer to CLIENT-LICENSE.TXT
#
# Note: IPV6 support and tun Support must be enabled before calling this
script.
#
LANGUAGE=C
if [ -z $TSP_VERBOSE ]; then
TSP_VERBOSE=0
fi
KillProcess()
/
comment #5
The first non-executable-script is the sample script in /usr/share. The second
is the script actually used by the program, but it doesn't need execution
because is called: /bin/sh /etc/gogoc/template/linux.sh
your linux.sh
[root@macmini ~]# head -40 /etc/gogoc/template/linux.sh
#!/bin/sh
#
# $Id: linux.sh,v 1.3 2010/03/07 19:31:17 carl Exp $
#
# This source code copyright (c) gogo6 Inc. 2002-2006.
#
# For license information refer to CLIENT-LICENSE.TXT
#
# Note: IPV6 support and tun Support must be enabled before calling this
script.
#
# Changed here for Debian systems - used for radvd config file only
TSP_HOME_DIR=/var/run/gogoc
LANGUAGE=C
if [ -z $TSP_VERBOSE ]; then
TSP_VERBOSE=0
fi
KillProcess()
{
if [ ! -z $TSP_VERBOSE ]; then
if [ $TSP_VERBOSE -ge 2 ]; then
echo killing $*
fi
fi
PID=`ps axww | grep $1 | grep -v grep | awk '{ print $1;}'`
echo $PID
# This check doesn't work in Fedora, I don't know why
# if [ ! -z $PID ]; then
for i in $PID
do
kill $i
done
# fi
}
Display()
/
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 770283] Review Request: uptimed - A daemon to record and keep track of system up times
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770283 Tomasz Torcz zdzi...@irc.pl changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #31 from Tomasz Torcz zdzi...@irc.pl 2012-02-12 05:48:45 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: uptimed Short Description: A daemon to record and keep track of system up times Owners: ttorcz Branches: f16 f17 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 757348] Review Request: mgarepo - Tools for Mageia repository access and management
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757348 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 757348] Review Request: mgarepo - Tools for Mageia repository access and management
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757348 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-02-12 05:54:20 EST --- mgarepo-1.10.2-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mgarepo-1.10.2-1.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 787293] Review Request: sparkleshare - Easy file sharing based on git repositories
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787293 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||pa...@hubbitus.info AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pa...@hubbitus.info Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 789614] Review Request: apache-mina - Apache MINA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789614 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||akurt...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2012-02-12 06:55:34 EST --- I'll do this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 789614] Review Request: apache-mina - Apache MINA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789614 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2012-02-12 07:00:46 EST --- Initial comments: * Latest mina release is 2.0.4. Please update to it before the official review. * Requires (post/postun) on jpackage-utils are not needed. * Javadoc subpackage misses requires on jpackage-utils but installs in _javadocdir which is owned by jpackage-utils. * Apache projects ship source tarballs no need to create it manually, just look at http://mina.apache.org/downloads.html * javadoc subpackage is independant but LICENSE.txt is not installed with it (%doc LICENSE.txt) Once these issues are fixed official review will follow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 789614] Review Request: apache-mina - Apache MINA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789614 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|akurt...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 772995] Review Request: globus-xioperf - XIO Performance Tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772995
Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||steve.tray...@cern.ch
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|steve.tray...@cern.ch
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2012-02-12 08:21:02
EST ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
C/C++
[x]: MUST Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: MUST Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: MUST Package contains no static executables.
[x]: MUST Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: MUST Package is not relocatable.
Generic
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
ASL 2.0 and clear like globus packages.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one supported primary architecture.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Buildroot is not present
rhel5 being targeted
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Epel 5 being targeted
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
present but epel5
[x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: MUST Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
Globus guideliens.
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generates any conflict.
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
rpmlint globus-xioperf-3.0-2.fc18.i686.rpm
globus-xioperf.i686: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US
globus-xioperf.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary globus-xioperf
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
rpmlint globus-xioperf-3.0-2.fc18.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint globus-xioperf-debuginfo-3.0-2.fc18.i686.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
/home/steve/tmp/review/772995/globus_xioperf-3.0.tar.gz :
MD5SUM this package : bb493c622f033257f2f7171e3f72abe8
MD5SUM upstream package : bb493c622f033257f2f7171e3f72abe8
[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[ ]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: SHOULD Spec use %global instead of %define.
Issues:
None
Comments:
There is a (trivial) patch file being applied with no comment as to why.
Generated by fedora-review 0.1.2
External plugins:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 789251] Review Request: jmeters - Multichannel audio level meter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789251 Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|unspecified |medium Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||lakshminaras2...@gmail.com Platform|Unspecified |All AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lakshminaras2...@gmail.com Severity|unspecified |medium OS/Version|Unspecified |Linux -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 787293] Review Request: sparkleshare - Easy file sharing based on git repositories
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787293
--- Comment #6 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info
2012-02-12 09:07:14 EST ---
Sorry for such delay.
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[!]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
$ licensecheck -r * | fgrep -v 'GPL (v3 or later)'
ltmain.sh: GPL (v2 or later)
SparkleLib/AssemblyInfo.cs: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
SparkleShare/SparkleOptions.cs: MIT/X11 (BSD like)
SparkleShare/Mac/Growl.framework/Headers/GrowlDefines.h: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
SparkleShare/Mac/Growl.framework/Headers/GrowlApplicationBridge.h: UNKNOWN
SparkleShare/Mac/Growl.framework/Headers/Growl.h: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
SparkleShare/Mac/Growl.framework/Headers/GrowlApplicationBridge-Carbon.h: *No
copyright* Public domain
SparkleShare/Mac/Growl.framework/Versions/A/Headers/GrowlDefines.h: *No
copyright* UNKNOWN
SparkleShare/Mac/Growl.framework/Versions/A/Headers/GrowlApplicationBridge.h:
UNKNOWN
SparkleShare/Mac/Growl.framework/Versions/A/Headers/Growl.h: *No copyright*
UNKNOWN
SparkleShare/Mac/Growl.framework/Versions/A/Headers/GrowlApplicationBridge-Carbon.h:
*No copyright* Public domain
SparkleShare/Mac/Growl.framework/Versions/Current/Headers/GrowlDefines.h: *No
copyright* UNKNOWN
SparkleShare/Mac/Growl.framework/Versions/Current/Headers/GrowlApplicationBridge.h:
UNKNOWN
SparkleShare/Mac/Growl.framework/Versions/Current/Headers/Growl.h: *No
copyright* UNKNOWN
SparkleShare/Mac/Growl.framework/Versions/Current/Headers/GrowlApplicationBridge-Carbon.h:
*No copyright* Public domain
SparkleShare/Mac/MainMenu.xib.designer.cs: *No copyright* GENERATED FILE
SparkleShare/SparkleSetup.cs: UNKNOWN
SparkleShare/SparkleEntry.cs: UNKNOWN
ltmain.sh is part of libtool and bundling does not allowed.
Do you known why these files have different license or does not licensed on
anything manner?
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one supported primary architecture.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[!]: MUST Buildroot is not present
Note: Buildroot is not needed unless packager plans to package for EPEL5
As It is not build on EPEL-5 due to the missing ndesk-dbus-devel dependency
(http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3783802) I assume it is not
targeted for EPEL-5. Please remove such legacy things or ensure it is built on
EPEL-5.
[!]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
See comment above about libtool. It must be removed in %prep.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[!]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: Clean is needed only if supporting EPEL
[!]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[!]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
Note: defattr() present in %files -f %{name}.lang section. This is OK
if packaging for EPEL5. Otherwise not needed
[-]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: MUST Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop using desktop-
file-install file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[!]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf is only needed if supporting EPEL5
[x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: MUST The spec file handles locales properly.
Guidelines say
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files what
BuildRequires: gettext needed. But I'm doubt it is really needed.
[!]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
For what you include:
%global debug_package %{nil}
?
I think it should be removed. Or just add comment about purposes.
You free to use or not macroses in URL, but please do not mix and chose one of:
Source0:
https://github.com/downloads/hbons/SparkleShare/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
Source0:
https://github.com/downloads/hbons/SparkleShare/sparkleshare-0.8.0.tar.gz
[Bug 714491] Review Request: xmodconfig - A graphical front end for xmodmap
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714491 Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Last Closed||2012-02-12 11:35:30 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 769794] new package: rpm2targz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769794 --- Comment #2 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at 2012-02-12 11:38:38 EST --- How is it going? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 767082] Review Request: wxpropgrid - A property sheet control for wxWidgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767082 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|wxpropgrid-1.4.15-1.fc16|wxpropgrid-1.4.15-1.el6 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-02-12 13:06:12 EST --- wxpropgrid-1.4.15-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766932] Review Request: icfg - utiltiy for scriptable editing of network interface files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766932 Jon Masters j...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #21 from Jon Masters j...@redhat.com 2012-02-12 14:15:22 EST --- Should we close this or set it to some state now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 760594] Review Request: simcrs - C++ Simulated Travel-Oriented Distribution System Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760594 Bug 760594 depends on bug 750099, which changed state. Bug 750099 Summary: Review Request: airinv - C++ Simulated Airline Inventory Management System Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750099 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720323] Review Request: perl-Module-Runtime - Runtime module handling
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720323 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-02-12 15:29:09 EST --- perl-Module-Runtime-0.012-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Module-Runtime-0.012-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 788258] Review Request: perl-Module-Implementation - Loads one of several alternate underlying implementations for a module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788258 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-02-12 15:27:28 EST --- perl-Module-Implementation-0.05-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Module-Implementation-0.05-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 789614] Review Request: apache-mina - Apache MINA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789614 --- Comment #3 from Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com 2012-02-12 15:36:59 EST --- Made the changes pointed out in comment 2. The updated spec and SRPM are available here: Spec URL: http://www.xente.mundo-r.com/304027W0001/rpms/apache-mina.spec SRPM URL: http://www.xente.mundo-r.com/304027W0001/rpms/apache-mina-2.0.4-1.fc17.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 789759] New: Review Request: mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base - Cross compiled GStreamer media framework base plug-ins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base - Cross compiled GStreamer media framework base plug-ins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789759 Summary: Review Request: mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base - Cross compiled GStreamer media framework base plug-ins Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tuxa...@o2.pl QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2448780/mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2448780/mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.35-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: Cross compiled GStreamer media framework base plug-ins -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712567] Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-ambiance - the ambiance gnome-shell theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712567 --- Comment #14 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com 2012-02-12 15:54:19 EST --- Wouldn't it be time to feed the Git now...? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 772485] Review Request: wmnd - Dockapp for monitoring network interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772485 --- Comment #6 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com 2012-02-12 16:06:59 EST --- (In reply to comment #5) It looks like your SRPM embedded .tar.gz is gzipped: $ gunzip wmnd-0.4.16.tar.gz $ file wmnd-0.4.16.tar wmnd-0.4.16.tar: gzip compressed data, from Unix, last modified: Mon Aug 16 20:10:11 2010, max compression $ tar -ztf wmnd-0.4.16.tar wmnd-0.4.16/ (other filenames) wmnd-0.4.16/src/README.master.xpm Unpacking the usual way doesn't work for me, sorry. Neither gzip nor tar nor File Roller are able the unpack it correctly. The way I use in the spec works. This should also fix the file size mismatch. When I compare the hashes of the srpm tarball and the downloaded tarball, i get the following: $ md5sum * d8229eece41c9fd0fde12198ce85191a wmnd-0.4.16.tar.gz d8229eece41c9fd0fde12198ce85191a wmnd-0.4.16.tar.gz.packaged -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 789759] Review Request: mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base - Cross compiled GStreamer media framework base plug-ins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789759
Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||fedora-mingw@lists.fedorapr
||oject.org,
||kalevlem...@gmail.com
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|kalevlem...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com 2012-02-12 16:08:59
EST ---
Fedora review of mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.35-1.fc16.src.rpm 2012-02-12
+ OK
! needs attention
rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-base \
mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-base-debuginfo-0.10.35-1.fc17.noarch.rpm \
mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.35-1.fc17.src.rpm
mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-base.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.35/COPYING
mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-base-debuginfo.noarch: E: description-line-too-long C
This package provides debug information for package
mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-base.
mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-base-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources
mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base.src:114: W: macro-in-comment %{mingw32_libdir}
mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base.src:114: W: macro-in-comment %{majorminor}
mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base.src:115: W: macro-in-comment %{mingw32_libdir}
mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base.src:115: W: macro-in-comment %{majorminor}
mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base.src:139: W: macro-in-comment %{_mingw32_libdir}
mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base.src:139: W: macro-in-comment %{majorminor}
mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base.src:8: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces:
line 5, tab: line 8)
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 7 warnings.
Should be easy to get rid of the mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs warning, but the
rest is mostly just noise.
To reduce the macro-in-comment rpmlint spew, I think I'd personally just remove
the commented out lines in %files section (easy enough to add them back when
needed), but it's fine the way it currently is as well.
+ The package is named according to Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines
+ The spec file name matches the base package name.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines.
+ The license field in the spec file matches the actual license
+ The stated license is the same as the one for the corresponding
native Fedora package
+ The package contains the license file (COPYING)
+ Spec file is written in American English
+ Spec file is legible
+ Upstream sources match sources in the srpm. md5sum:
1d300983525f4f09030eb3ba47cb04b0 gst-plugins-base-0.10.35.tar.bz2
1d300983525f4f09030eb3ba47cb04b0 Download/gst-plugins-base-0.10.35.tar.bz2
+ The package builds in koji
n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed
+ BuildRequires look sane
+ The spec file handles locales properly
n/a ldconfig in %post and %postun
+ Package does not bundle copies of system libraries
n/a Package isn't relocatable
! Package owns all directories it creates
The package creates %{_mingw32_libdir}/gstreamer-%{majorminor}/ directory, but
doesn't own it. One way to fix it would be to add:
%dir %{_mingw32_libdir}/gstreamer-%{majorminor}
to %files.
+ No duplicate files in %files
+ Permissions are properly set
+ Consistent use of macros
+ The package must contain code or permissible content
n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ Files marked %doc should not affect package
n/a Header files should be in -devel
Not applicable to MinGW packages.
n/a Static libraries should be in -static
n/a Library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package
n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base
+ Packages must not contain libtool .la files
n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
+ Directory ownership sane, except for the directory mentioned above
+ Filenames are valid UTF-8
Summary
---
Please fix the %{_mingw32_libdir}/gstreamer-%{majorminor}/ directory ownership
issue and take a look if it's possible to get rid of some of the rpmlint
warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 782957] Review Request: musca - A simple dynamic window manager fox X
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782957 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-02-12 16:19:45 EST --- Please fix name/description, and add f17 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 784954] Review Request: ktp-kded-integration-module - KDE integration for telepathy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784954 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-02-12 16:20:39 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 770283] Review Request: uptimed - A daemon to record and keep track of system up times
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770283 --- Comment #32 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-02-12 16:18:21 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 772485] Review Request: wmnd - Dockapp for monitoring network interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772485 --- Comment #7 from Christos Triantafyllidis christos.triantafylli...@gmail.com 2012-02-12 16:24:38 EST --- Hi Mario, just to be clear, i did an informal review as i'm not sponsored to do a formal one. To my knowledge the way you unpack the tarball proves that you embed a gzipped tar.gz. I'm not sure if vendor provides such tarball (if this is the case i would advice you to contact them). Regarding md5sum and filesizes this was report from rpmlint not mine :) I hope that someone will help you soon to include this package in the dist by formally reviewing it. Christos -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 789759] Review Request: mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base - Cross compiled GStreamer media framework base plug-ins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789759 --- Comment #2 from Paweł Forysiuk tuxa...@o2.pl 2012-02-12 16:40:47 EST --- Updated files here Spec URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2448780/mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2448780/mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.35-2.fc16.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 789759] Review Request: mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base - Cross compiled GStreamer media framework base plug-ins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789759 Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com 2012-02-12 16:43:36 EST --- Looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 789759] Review Request: mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base - Cross compiled GStreamer media framework base plug-ins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789759 Paweł Forysiuk tuxa...@o2.pl changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Paweł Forysiuk tuxa...@o2.pl 2012-02-12 16:47:38 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base Short Description: Cross compiled GStreamer media framework base plug-ins Tools Owners: pfor kalev epienbro Branches: f16 f17 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 757348] Review Request: mgarepo - Tools for Mageia repository access and management
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757348 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-02-12 17:47:59 EST --- mgarepo-1.10.2-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 781705] Review Request: perl-System-Command - Object for running system commands
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781705 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-System-Command-1.06-1. |perl-System-Command-1.06-1. |fc16|fc15 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-02-12 17:48:13 EST --- perl-System-Command-1.06-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 781793] Review Request: perl-String-ToIdentifier-EN - Convert Strings to English Program Identifiers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781793 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-String-ToIdentifier-EN ||-0.06-1.fc16 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2012-02-12 17:48:47 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-02-12 17:48:47 EST --- perl-String-ToIdentifier-EN-0.06-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 783015] Review Request: meataxe - Matrix representations over finite fields
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783015
Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at 2012-02-12 17:50:23 EST
---
Summary:
- Maybe you can keep the manpage timestamps
- smp_mflags doesn't help on target rebuild-doc
- Consider to ship README in the libs-subpackage, as the e-mail address is
useful with this part as well
- Consider to rephrase the devel summary, because not only header files are
installed
Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
C/C++
[x]: MUST Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: MUST Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: MUST Package contains no static executables.
[x]: MUST Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: MUST Package is not relocatable.
Generic
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one supported primary architecture.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Buildroot is not present
Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL is required
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[-]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: MUST Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generates any conflict.
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[-]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
The specfile states, upstream is not interested in shared libraries, so we'll
have to live with that.
meataxe-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libmtx.so.2.4.24
exit@GLIBC_2.2.5
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
The path is only used to generate the documentation, so that should be fine.
meataxe.src:58: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/gcc/*/*/include`|
Custom source
meataxe.src: W: invalid-url Source1: meataxe-man.tar.xz
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings.
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
7f66fad338372b7bc43c5c3adbabeb84
[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[-]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
/usr/sbin.
[x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
--requires).
[?]: SHOULD Package
[Bug 781705] Review Request: perl-System-Command - Object for running system commands
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781705 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-System-Command-1.06-1. ||fc16 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2012-02-12 17:46:25 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-02-12 17:46:25 EST --- perl-System-Command-1.06-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 783015] Review Request: meataxe - Matrix representations over finite fields
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783015 --- Comment #4 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at 2012-02-12 17:52:03 EST --- APPROVED, that is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 781706] Review Request: perl-String-CamelCase - Convert underscore_text to CamelCase and back
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781706 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-String-CamelCase-0.02- |perl-String-CamelCase-0.02- |1.fc15 |1.fc16 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-02-12 17:52:33 EST --- perl-String-CamelCase-0.02-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 781795] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-IntrospectableM2M - Introspect many-to-many shortcuts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781795 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-DBIx-Class-Introspecta |perl-DBIx-Class-Introspecta |bleM2M-0.001001-1.fc16 |bleM2M-0.001001-1.fc15 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-02-12 17:54:24 EST --- perl-DBIx-Class-IntrospectableM2M-0.001001-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 784167] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Attribute-Chained - Attribute that returns the instance to allow for chaining
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784167 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-MooseX-Attribute-Chain |perl-MooseX-Attribute-Chain |ed-1.0.1-1.fc16 |ed-1.0.1-1.fc15 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-02-12 17:54:03 EST --- perl-MooseX-Attribute-Chained-1.0.1-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 772499] Review Request: python-anfft - ANFFT is an FFT package for Python, based on FFTW
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772499 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-anfft-0.1-3.fc16 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2012-02-12 17:53:41 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-02-12 17:53:41 EST --- python-anfft-0.1-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 781706] Review Request: perl-String-CamelCase - Convert underscore_text to CamelCase and back
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781706 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-String-CamelCase-0.02- ||1.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2012-02-12 17:52:25 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-02-12 17:52:25 EST --- perl-String-CamelCase-0.02-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 781795] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-IntrospectableM2M - Introspect many-to-many shortcuts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781795 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-DBIx-Class-Introspecta ||bleM2M-0.001001-1.fc16 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2012-02-12 17:54:15 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-02-12 17:54:15 EST --- perl-DBIx-Class-IntrospectableM2M-0.001001-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 772499] Review Request: python-anfft - ANFFT is an FFT package for Python, based on FFTW
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772499 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|python-anfft-0.1-3.fc16 |python-anfft-0.1-3.fc15 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-02-12 17:54:32 EST --- python-anfft-0.1-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 781793] Review Request: perl-String-ToIdentifier-EN - Convert Strings to English Program Identifiers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781793 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-String-ToIdentifier-EN |perl-String-ToIdentifier-EN |-0.06-1.fc16|-0.06-1.fc15 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-02-12 17:51:54 EST --- perl-String-ToIdentifier-EN-0.06-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 784167] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Attribute-Chained - Attribute that returns the instance to allow for chaining
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784167 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-MooseX-Attribute-Chain ||ed-1.0.1-1.fc16 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2012-02-12 17:53:54 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-02-12 17:53:54 EST --- perl-MooseX-Attribute-Chained-1.0.1-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 788718] Review Request: clalsadrv - An ALSA driver C++ library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788718 Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||789059 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 788718] Review Request: clalsadrv - An ALSA driver C++ library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788718 Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||789055 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 789055] Review Request: japa - JACK and ALSA Perceptual Analyser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789055 Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||788718 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 789390] Review Request: aeolus - a synthesized organ for ALSA/JACK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789390 Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||788718 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 789059] Review Request: jaaa - JACK and ALSA Audio Analyzer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789059 Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||788718 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 788718] Review Request: clalsadrv - An ALSA driver C++ library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788718 Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at Blocks||789390 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 788583] Review Request: maven-common-artifact-filters - Maven Common Artifact Filters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788583 Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |maven-common-artifact-filt |maven-common-artifact-filte |ers - Maven Common|rs - Maven Common Artifact |Artifact Filters |Filters --- Comment #1 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at 2012-02-12 18:11:28 EST --- Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/maven-common-artifact-filters.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/maven-common-artifact-filters-1.4-1.fc16.src.rpm This way it will work for fedora-review, I hope! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 787510] Review Request: glm - C++ mathematics library for graphics programming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787510 Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #7 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at 2012-02-12 18:22:13 EST --- Please use %global instead of %define: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define What is a zib bomb? rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT is no longer necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 768894] Review Request: haven - Next Generation Backup System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768894 --- Comment #6 from Davide Benini dben...@redhat.com 2012-02-12 18:51:58 EST --- Thank you Jamie, I removed useless sections and tags as suggested. * Updated spec file and source RPM: Spec URL: http://www.dbenini.com/haven/fedora/haven.spec SRPM URL: http://www.dbenini.com/haven/fedora/haven-0.0.2-4.fc16.src.rpm * Koji scratch build info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3784798 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 769096] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-sustmi - Include two extensions, windowoverlay-icons and historymanager-prefix-search
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769096 Yader Velásquez yajo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Yader Velásquez yajo...@gmail.com 2012-02-12 18:54:46 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: gnome-shell-extension-sustmi Short Description: Include two extensions, windowoverlay-icons and historymanager-prefix-search Owners: yaderv Branches: f16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 723752] Review Request: lrslib - Reverse search for vertex enumeration/convex hull problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723752 --- Comment #11 from Doug Ledford dledf...@redhat.com 2012-02-12 20:03:55 EST --- Yes, that sounds perfectly reasonable to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 767050] Review Request: hibernate-validator - Bean Validation (JSR 303) Reference Implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767050 --- Comment #6 from Andy Grimm agr...@gmail.com 2012-02-12 20:40:59 EST --- Marek, I rebuilt your source rpms on F17 over the weekend. I had to make small changes to istack-commons, relaxngcc, and jaxb2-maven-plugin to make them build, but I got them to work. I am concerned about the bootstrapping for relaxngcc (because it looks like it relies on a binary jar right now, rather than doing a partial build followed by a full build or something), but I think we should work together to get this whole stack of things cleaned up and packaged. Thanks for working on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 787128] Review Request: libfep - Library to implement FEP (front end processor) on ANSI terminals
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787128 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 787128] Review Request: libfep - Library to implement FEP (front end processor) on ANSI terminals
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787128 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-02-12 20:50:28 EST --- libfep-0.0.4-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libfep-0.0.4-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 787128] Review Request: libfep - Library to implement FEP (front end processor) on ANSI terminals
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787128 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-02-12 20:50:19 EST --- libfep-0.0.4-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libfep-0.0.4-1.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 789212] Review Request: ibus-fep - IBus client for text terminals
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789212 Bug 789212 depends on bug 787128, which changed state. Bug 787128 Summary: Review Request: libfep - Library to implement FEP (front end processor) on ANSI terminals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787128 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 787128] Review Request: libfep - Library to implement FEP (front end processor) on ANSI terminals
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787128 Daiki Ueno du...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2012-02-12 20:53:16 --- Comment #9 from Daiki Ueno du...@redhat.com 2012-02-12 20:53:16 EST --- Thanks. Imported and built in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3784940 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 782661] Review Request: ehcache-sizeof-agent - Size of agent for ehcache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782661 --- Comment #2 from David Nalley da...@gnsa.us 2012-02-12 22:02:10 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ehcache-sizeof-agent Short Description: Sige of agent for ehcache Owners: ke4qqq agrimm Branches: f16 f17 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 770776] Review Request: jboss-jaspi-1.0-api - JBoss Java Authentication SPI for Containers 1.0 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770776 --- Comment #6 from Ricardo Arguello ricardo.argue...@gmail.com 2012-02-13 01:48:19 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: jboss-jaspi-1.0-api Short Description: JBoss Java Authentication SPI for Containers 1.0 API Owners:ricardo Branches: f17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 770776] Review Request: jboss-jaspi-1.0-api - JBoss Java Authentication SPI for Containers 1.0 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770776 Ricardo Arguello ricardo.argue...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
