[Bug 784605] Review Request: lv2-instance-access: An LV2 audio plug-in extension which enables plugin UIs access to an LV2 plugin

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784605

David Cornette  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||r...@davidcornette.com
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|r...@davidcornette.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 796703] Review Request: yawn - Web-based CIM/WBEM browser

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796703

Jan Safranek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #4 from Jan Safranek  2012-02-28 03:42:43 EST 
---
Now the package is perfect and I approve the package.

rpmbuild just complains:
Processing files: yawn-0-0.1.20120227svn561.fc16.noarch
warning: File listed twice: /var/www/yawn/index.py
warning: File listed twice: /var/www/yawn/index.pyc
warning: File listed twice: /var/www/yawn/index.pyo

Which does not do any harm (the package does not have any subpackages) and can
be fixed later.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 772987] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-condor - Globus Toolkit - Condor Job Manager Support

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772987

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  2012-02-28 
03:59:28 EST ---
globus-gram-job-manager-condor-1.0-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gram-job-manager-condor-1.0-2.fc17

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 772987] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-condor - Globus Toolkit - Condor Job Manager Support

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772987

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  
2012-02-28 03:59:56 EST ---
globus-gram-job-manager-condor-1.0-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gram-job-manager-condor-1.0-2.fc16

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 772987] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-condor - Globus Toolkit - Condor Job Manager Support

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772987

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 772987] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-condor - Globus Toolkit - Condor Job Manager Support

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772987

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  
2012-02-28 03:59:37 EST ---
globus-gram-job-manager-condor-1.0-2.el4 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora EPEL 4.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gram-job-manager-condor-1.0-2.el4

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 772987] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-condor - Globus Toolkit - Condor Job Manager Support

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772987

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  2012-02-28 
03:59:07 EST ---
globus-gram-job-manager-condor-1.0-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gram-job-manager-condor-1.0-2.el5

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 772987] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-condor - Globus Toolkit - Condor Job Manager Support

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772987

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  2012-02-28 
03:59:17 EST ---
globus-gram-job-manager-condor-1.0-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gram-job-manager-condor-1.0-2.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 772987] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-condor - Globus Toolkit - Condor Job Manager Support

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772987

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  
2012-02-28 03:59:46 EST ---
globus-gram-job-manager-condor-1.0-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gram-job-manager-condor-1.0-2.el6

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 785943] Review Request: python-gunicorn - Python WSGI application server

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785943

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||python-gunicorn-0.13.4-3.fc
   ||16
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2012-02-28 04:55:20

--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  
2012-02-28 04:55:20 EST ---
python-gunicorn-0.13.4-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 753262] Review Request: qxmpp-dev - Qt XMPP Library

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753262

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|qxmpp-dev-0.3.45.1-4.fc16   |qxmpp-dev-0.3.45.2-1.fc15

--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  
2012-02-28 04:52:43 EST ---
qxmpp-dev-0.3.45.2-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. 
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 798200] Review Request: dbus-cli - DBus console client

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798200

Michal Minar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Platform|All |noarch

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 790468] Review Request: gperftools - Very fast malloc and performance analysis tools

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790468

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|ceph-0.41-1.fc17|gperftools-2.0-4.fc15

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  
2012-02-28 04:57:36 EST ---
gperftools-2.0-4.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 798200] New: Review Request: dbus-cli - DBus console client

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: dbus-cli - DBus console client

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798200

   Summary: Review Request: dbus-cli - DBus console client
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: unspecified
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: mimi...@redhat.com
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
  Story Points: ---
  Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
 Documentation: ---


Spec URL: http://www.minami.cz/public/dbus-cli.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.minami.cz/public/dbus-cli-20120227svn8-1.fc16.src.rpm
Description: 
Tool to send messages to existing DBus services.
It is like KDE's dcop (but for DBus) or dbus-send (but much more use-friendly)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 798202] New: Review Request: python-ldappool - A connection pool for python-ldap

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: python-ldappool - A connection pool for python-ldap

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798202

   Summary: Review Request: python-ldappool - A connection pool
for python-ldap
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: karlthe...@gmail.com
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
  Story Points: ---
  Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
 Documentation: ---


Spec URL: http://hguemar.fedorapeople.org/review/python-ldappool.spec
SRPM URL: http://hguemar.fedorapeople.org/review/python-ldappool-1.0-0.src.rpm
Description: A simple connector pool for python-ldap.

The pool keeps LDAP connectors alive and let you reuse them,
drastically reducing the time spent to initiate a ldap connection.

--

rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint -iv python-ldappool-1.0-0.src.rpm
python-ldappool.src: I: checking
python-ldappool.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) ldap -> lap, leap, dapple
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

python-ldappool.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ldap -> lap, leap,
dapple
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

python-ldappool.src: I: checking-url
https://github.com/mozilla-services/ldappool (timeout 10 seconds)
python-ldappool.src: W: invalid-url Source0: ldappool-1.0.tar.gz
The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL.

$ rpmlint -iv python-ldappool-1.0-0.noarch.rpm
python-ldappool.noarch: I: checking
python-ldappool.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) ldap -> lap, leap,
dapple
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

python-ldappool.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ldap -> lap,
leap, dapple
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

python-ldappool.noarch: I: checking-url
https://github.com/mozilla-services/ldappool (timeout 10 seconds)

---
scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3826278

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 753262] Review Request: qxmpp-dev - Qt XMPP Library

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753262

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|qxmpp-dev-0.3.45.2-1.fc15   |qxmpp-dev-0.3.45.2-1.fc16

--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  
2012-02-28 04:58:54 EST ---
qxmpp-dev-0.3.45.2-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. 
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 790525] Review Request: rubygem-dynect_rest - Dynect REST API library

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790525

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||rubygem-dynect_rest-0.4.0-3
   ||.fc16
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2012-02-28 04:56:40

--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  
2012-02-28 04:56:40 EST ---
rubygem-dynect_rest-0.4.0-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 630822] Review Request: python-ansi2html - convert ansi color codes to html

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630822

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||python-ansi2html-0.8.3-1.fc
   ||16
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2012-02-28 04:57:06

--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  
2012-02-28 04:57:06 EST ---
python-ansi2html-0.8.3-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 798200] Review Request: dbus-cli - DBus console client

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798200

Jaroslav Reznik  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||jrez...@redhat.com
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jrez...@redhat.com
   Flag||fedora-review?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 785943] Review Request: python-gunicorn - Python WSGI application server

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785943

--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  
2012-02-28 05:08:05 EST ---
python-gunicorn-0.13.4-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 786359] Review Request: PyMunin - Python Module for developing Munin Multigraph Monitoring Plugins

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786359

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||PyMunin-0.9.4-2.fc16
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2012-02-28 05:08:55

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  
2012-02-28 05:08:55 EST ---
PyMunin-0.9.4-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 790468] Review Request: gperftools - Very fast malloc and performance analysis tools

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790468

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|gperftools-2.0-4.fc15   |ceph-0.39-2.fc16

--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  
2012-02-28 05:06:45 EST ---
ceph-0.39-2.fc16, gperftools-2.0-4.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||rubygem-idn-0.0.2-7.fc16
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA

--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System  
2012-02-28 05:09:18 EST ---
rubygem-idn-0.0.2-7.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 760594] Review Request: simcrs - C++ Simulated Travel-Oriented Distribution System Library

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760594

Matthias Runge  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||mru...@matthias-runge.de
   Flag||fedora-review?

--- Comment #1 from Matthias Runge  2012-02-28 
05:30:06 EST ---
I'm taking this one

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 789212] Review Request: ibus-fep - IBus client for text terminals

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789212

Parag AN(पराग)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||panem...@gmail.com
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com
   Flag||fedora-review+

--- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग)  2012-02-28 05:35:35 EST 
---
Review->

+ koji build for f17 =>
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3826230

+ rpmlint on rpms gave
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

+ Source verified with upstream as (sha1sum)
8a9cdab47a5b4555ef95e35ddbc2560fde33a120  ibus-fep-1.4.2.tar.gz
8a9cdab47a5b4555ef95e35ddbc2560fde33a120  ../SOURCES/ibus-fep-1.4.2.tar.gz


APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 782957] Review Request: musca - A simple dynamic window manager fox X

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782957

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||musca-0.9.24-3.fc17
 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  
2012-02-28 05:32:46 EST ---
musca-0.9.24-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 782661] Review Request: ehcache-sizeof-agent - Size of agent for ehcache

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782661

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||ehcache-sizeof-agent-1.0.1-
   ||1.fc17
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2012-02-28 05:33:08

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  2012-02-28 
05:33:08 EST ---
ehcache-sizeof-agent-1.0.1-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 790732] Review Request: rubygem-fakefs - A fake filesystem. Use it in your tests

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790732

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||rubygem-fakefs-0.4.0-1.fc17
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2012-02-28 05:38:18

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  2012-02-28 
05:38:18 EST ---
rubygem-fakefs-0.4.0-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
 If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 795679] Review Request: python-flexmock - Testing library that makes it easy to create mocks, stubs and fakes

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795679

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||python-flexmock-0.9.2-1.fc1
   ||7
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2012-02-28 05:37:47

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  2012-02-28 
05:37:47 EST ---
python-flexmock-0.9.2-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 794980] Review Request: zanshin - Todo/action management software

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794980

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||zanshin-0.2.1-1.fc17
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2012-02-28 05:39:56

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  
2012-02-28 05:39:56 EST ---
zanshin-0.2.1-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 788080] Review Request: python-xhtml2pdf - HTML/CSS to PDF converter based on Python

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788080

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||python-xhtml2pdf-0.0.3-3.fc
   ||17
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2012-02-28 05:41:08

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  
2012-02-28 05:41:08 EST ---
python-xhtml2pdf-0.0.3-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 795099] Review Request: share-like-connect - Share, like and connect concept for Plasma Active

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795099

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  2012-02-28 
05:42:00 EST ---
share-like-connect-0.2-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 673784] Rename Request: mingw32-filesystem -> mingw-filesystem - Cross compiler base filesystem and environment

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673784

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||mingw-filesystem-69-15.fc17
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2012-02-28 05:45:05

--- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System  
2012-02-28 05:45:05 EST ---
mingw-filesystem-69-15.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 794693] Review Request: maven-anno-plugin - Maven Annotated Mojo

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794693

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||maven-anno-plugin-1.4.1-2.f
   ||c17
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA

--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  2012-02-28 
05:43:38 EST ---
maven-anno-plugin-1.4.1-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 790154] Review Request: python-mwlib - MediaWiki parser and utility library

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790154

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||python-qserve-0.2.7-1.fc17
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2012-02-28 05:42:29

--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  
2012-02-28 05:42:29 EST ---
python-qserve-0.2.7-1.fc17, python-mwlib-0.13.4-1.fc17 has been pushed to the
Fedora 17 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it
in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 789108] Review Request: python-qserve - Job queue server

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789108

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||python-qserve-0.2.7-1.fc17
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2012-02-28 05:42:36

--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  2012-02-28 
05:42:36 EST ---
python-qserve-0.2.7-1.fc17, python-mwlib-0.13.4-1.fc17 has been pushed to the
Fedora 17 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it
in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 788718] Review Request: clalsadrv - An ALSA driver C++ library

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788718

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||clalsadrv-2.0.0-3.fc17
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2012-02-28 05:49:20

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  
2012-02-28 05:49:20 EST ---
clalsadrv-2.0.0-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 782250] Review Request: xml-maven-plugin - Maven XML plugin

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782250

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||xml-maven-plugin-1.0-3.fc17
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2012-02-28 05:47:33

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  2012-02-28 
05:47:33 EST ---
xml-maven-plugin-1.0-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 787128] Review Request: libfep - Library to implement FEP (front end processor) on ANSI terminals

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787128

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|libfep-0.0.5-1.fc15 |libfep-0.0.5-1.fc17

--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  
2012-02-28 05:52:33 EST ---
libfep-0.0.5-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 796703] Review Request: yawn - Web-based CIM/WBEM browser

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796703

Vitezslav Crhonek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #5 from Vitezslav Crhonek  2012-02-28 05:57:40 
EST ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: yawn
Short Description: Web-based CIM/WBEM browser
Owners: vcrhonek
Branches: f16 f17
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 795098] Review Request: startactive - An alternative Plasma session start script

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795098

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||startactive-0.2-1.fc17
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA

--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  2012-02-28 
05:56:47 EST ---
startactive-0.2-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 794722] Review Request: rngom - Java library for parsing RELAX NG grammars

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794722

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||rngom-201103-0.4.20120119sv
   ||n.fc17
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA

--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  
2012-02-28 05:57:21 EST ---
rngom-201103-0.4.20120119svn.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 783683] Review Request: cptutils - Utilities to manipulate and translate color gradients

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783683

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|cptutils-1.42-2.fc16|cptutils-1.42-2.fc17

--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  
2012-02-28 05:59:40 EST ---
cptutils-1.42-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 795603] Review Request: perl-Tk-CursorControl - Manipulate the mouse cursor programmatically

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795603

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Tk-CursorControl-0.4-2
   ||.fc17
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2012-02-28 05:58:56

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  2012-02-28 
05:58:56 EST ---
perl-Tk-CursorControl-0.4-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 795605] Review Request: perl-Tk-ToolBar - Toolbar widget for Perl/Tk

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795605

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  2012-02-28 
07:13:52 EST ---
perl-Tk-ToolBar-0.10-3.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Tk-ToolBar-0.10-3.fc16

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 798248] New: Review Request: rubygem-ruby-dbus - Ruby module for interaction with D-Bus

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ruby-dbus - Ruby module for interaction with 
D-Bus

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798248

   Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ruby-dbus - Ruby module for
interaction with D-Bus
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: bkab...@redhat.com
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
  Story Points: ---
  Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
 Documentation: ---


Spec URL: http://bkabrda.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/ruby-dbus/rubygem-ruby-dbus.spec
SRPM URL:
http://bkabrda.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/ruby-dbus/rubygem-ruby-dbus-0.7.0-1.fc17.src.rpm
Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3827402
Description: Ruby D-Bus provides an implementation of the D-Bus protocol such
that the D-Bus system can be used in the Ruby programming language.


Please note, that this package will obsolete ruby-dbus.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 795605] Review Request: perl-Tk-ToolBar - Toolbar widget for Perl/Tk

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795605

--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  2012-02-28 
07:13:41 EST ---
perl-Tk-ToolBar-0.10-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Tk-ToolBar-0.10-3.fc17

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 795605] Review Request: perl-Tk-ToolBar - Toolbar widget for Perl/Tk

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795605

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 790984] Review Request: python-mwlib-xhtml - XHTML writer for mwlib

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790984

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|python-mwlib-xhtml-0.1.0-3. |python-mwlib-xhtml-0.1.0-3.
   |fc16|fc17

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  2012-02-28 
06:03:31 EST ---
python-mwlib-xhtml-0.1.0-3.fc17, python-mwlib-docbook-0.1.0-3.fc17 has been
pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 790985] Review Request: python-mwlib-docbook - DocBook writer for mwlib

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790985

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|python-mwlib-xhtml-0.1.0-3. |python-mwlib-xhtml-0.1.0-3.
   |fc16|fc17

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  2012-02-28 
06:03:38 EST ---
python-mwlib-xhtml-0.1.0-3.fc17, python-mwlib-docbook-0.1.0-3.fc17 has been
pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 784592] Review Request: jpf - Java Plug-in Framework

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784592

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||jpf-1.5.1-4.fc17
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2012-02-28 06:02:01

--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  
2012-02-28 06:02:01 EST ---
jpf-1.5.1-4.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 796183] Review Request: python-nitrate - Python API for the Nitrate test case management system

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796183

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||python-nitrate-0.7-2.fc17
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2012-02-28 06:04:31

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  
2012-02-28 06:04:31 EST ---
python-nitrate-0.7-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 798248] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-dbus - Ruby module for interaction with D-Bus

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798248

Vít Ondruch  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||vondr...@redhat.com
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|vondr...@redhat.com
   Flag||fedora-review?

--- Comment #1 from Vít Ondruch  2012-02-28 07:19:23 EST 
---
I'll take this for a review.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 798254] New: Review Request: perl-Config-Validator - Schema based configuration validation

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Validator - Schema based configuration 
validation

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798254

   Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Validator - Schema based
configuration validation
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: massimo.pala...@gmail.com
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
  Story Points: ---
  Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
 Documentation: ---


Spec URL:
https://mpaladin.web.cern.ch/mpaladin/rpms/perl-Config-Validator/perl-Config-Validator.spec
SRPM URL:
https://mpaladin.web.cern.ch/mpaladin/rpms/perl-Config-Validator/perl-Config-Validator-0.3-1.fc16.src.rpm
Description: This module allows to perform schema based configuration
validation.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 783825] Review Request: suil - A lightweight C library for loading and wrapping LV2 plugin UIs

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783825

--- Comment #20 from Brendan Jones  2012-02-28 
07:49:30 EST ---
OK, updated the man, macros and optflags (good catch).

Can't do anything about about the gtk dependencies in the qt lib - have a look
at the source. 

SRPM:  http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/lv2/suil-0.4.4-5.fc16.src.rpm
SPEC:  http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/lv2/suil.spec

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 182122] Review Request: multitail

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182122

--- Comment #30 from Jon Ciesla  2012-02-28 08:15:50 EST 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 797072] Review Request: iwidgets - A set of useful widgets based on itcl and itk

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797072

--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla  2012-02-28 08:18:49 EST 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 480724] Review Request: ndjbdns - New djbdns, usable djbdns.

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724

--- Comment #54 from pjp  2012-02-28 08:18:53 EST ---
Hi, I've made the changes, please see:

SPEC: http://pjp.dgplug.org/djbdns/ndjbdns.spec
SRPM: http://pjp.dgplug.org/djbdns/ndjbdns-1.05.4-5.fc16.src.rpm
Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3827635

Thanks you!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 797145] Review Request: eclipse-slice2java - A plugin that integrates Eclipse with Ice object middleware

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797145

--- Comment #4 from Mary Ellen Foster  2012-02-28 08:20:57 
EST ---
Ah, I guess both of those are remnants of the package's previous Fedora
incarnation. Fixed.

Spec URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org//eclipse-slice2java.spec
SRPM URL:
http://mef.fedorapeople.org//eclipse-slice2java-3.4.2.20111024-2.fc16.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 796703] Review Request: yawn - Web-based CIM/WBEM browser

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796703

--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla  2012-02-28 08:17:03 EST 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 797146] Review Request: eclipse-color-theme - An Eclipse plugin which permits color theme switching

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797146

--- Comment #3 from Mary Ellen Foster  2012-02-28 08:33:32 
EST ---
Fixed the source URL to get the correct tag from git instead of "master"


Spec URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org//eclipse-color-theme.spec
SRPM URL:
http://mef.fedorapeople.org//eclipse-color-theme-0.11.1-2.fc16.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 794990] Review Request: get-flash-videos - CLI tool to download flash video from websites

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794990

Petr Šabata  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||CANTFIX
Last Closed||2012-02-28 08:54:48

--- Comment #8 from Petr Šabata  2012-02-28 08:54:48 EST ---
I've just noticed (halfway through the review) this package relies on rtmpdump
which is not (and won't be) in Fedora.

You'd have to strip all the modules that use it which would cripple the
package.  I'm closing this as CANTFIX.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 789251] Review Request: jmeters - Multichannel audio level meter

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789251

--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  2012-02-28 
09:20:12 EST ---
jmeters-0.2.0-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jmeters-0.2.0-3.fc17

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 789251] Review Request: jmeters - Multichannel audio level meter

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789251

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  2012-02-28 
09:20:23 EST ---
jmeters-0.2.0-3.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jmeters-0.2.0-3.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 789251] Review Request: jmeters - Multichannel audio level meter

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789251

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 789251] Review Request: jmeters - Multichannel audio level meter

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789251

--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  2012-02-28 
09:20:03 EST ---
jmeters-0.2.0-3.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jmeters-0.2.0-3.fc16

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 798248] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-dbus - Ruby module for interaction with D-Bus

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798248

--- Comment #2 from Vít Ondruch  2012-02-28 09:22:27 EST 
---
* Test suite execution
  - The test command you are using is somehow cryptic as well as the result is
not comprehensive. Is this really the best approach? Wouldn't be better to
fallback to rake in this particular case?

* Bundled libraries
  - the lib/dbus/core_ext directory contains files copied from active support.
Not sure if we should replace them by dependency on AS. If not, the license
of the package should be adjusted at least. The best would be if upstream
will consider to remove this bundled files, but I can imagine it will
be hard :/

* Rename
  - The package should obsolete and provide "oldpackagename", however you are
obsoleting and providing virtual provide. Is that intentional?

Please fix the above mentioned issues before the package could be approved.
Thank you.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 789249] Review Request: jkmeter - Horizontal or vertical bar-graph audio levels meter

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789249

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  
2012-02-28 09:29:31 EST ---
jkmeter-0.6.1-4.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jkmeter-0.6.1-4.fc16

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 789249] Review Request: jkmeter - Horizontal or vertical bar-graph audio levels meter

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789249

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  2012-02-28 
09:29:09 EST ---
jkmeter-0.6.1-4.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jkmeter-0.6.1-4.fc17

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 789249] Review Request: jkmeter - Horizontal or vertical bar-graph audio levels meter

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789249

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  2012-02-28 
09:29:21 EST ---
jkmeter-0.6.1-4.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jkmeter-0.6.1-4.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 789249] Review Request: jkmeter - Horizontal or vertical bar-graph audio levels meter

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789249

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 798248] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-dbus - Ruby module for interaction with D-Bus

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798248

--- Comment #3 from Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda  2012-02-28 
09:29:43 EST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> * Test suite execution
>   - The test command you are using is somehow cryptic as well as the result is
> not comprehensive. Is this really the best approach? Wouldn't be better to
> fallback to rake in this particular case?

I found out an easier way:
RUBYOPT="-I../lib" ./test_env testrb *_test.rb t[0-9]*.rb
I think that this is quite straightforward and I would really not like to get
to rake. Would this be ok for you?

> * Bundled libraries
>   - the lib/dbus/core_ext directory contains files copied from active support.
> Not sure if we should replace them by dependency on AS. If not, the 
> license
> of the package should be adjusted at least. The best would be if upstream
> will consider to remove this bundled files, but I can imagine it will
> be hard :/
> 

I will investigate and try to discuss it with upstream.

> * Rename
>   - The package should obsolete and provide "oldpackagename", however you are
> obsoleting and providing virtual provide. Is that intentional?
> 

Hmm, I am not sure and the guidelines [1] don't say anything about virtual
provides. Maybe both package name and its virtual provides should be obsoleted?

> Please fix the above mentioned issues before the package could be approved.
> Thank you.

When I solve points 2 and 3, I'll post new SPEC and SRPM.

[1]
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.2FReplacing_Existing_Packages

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 798200] Review Request: dbus-cli - DBus console client

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798200

Jaroslav Reznik  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)

--- Comment #1 from Jaroslav Reznik  2012-02-28 09:33:19 
EST ---
Name: not ok, the upstream project is called dbus-tools, shouldn't be better to
use it as well? as dbus-tools is a set of dbus-cli and zsh autocompetition,
personally I prefer dbus-tools
Version: not ok, version should be 0
Release: not ok, should be 0.1.20120227svn, you don't have to add revision as
it's commented in sources part
License: ISC, ok
URL: ok
Sources: SVN snapshot, ok, correct description to get the source codes
BuildArch: ok
BuildRequires: not ok, missing python2-devel according to package guidelines
for Python
Requires: not ok, python(abi) >= 2.7, python(abi) < 3.0 has to be removed
Description: ok but should be updated - dcop section is not correct anymore
Macros used consistently: ok
Documentation: ok

rpmlint dbus-cli-20120227svn8-1.fc16.src.rpm 
dbus-cli.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dcop -> cop, drop, d cop
- ok
dbus-cli.src: W: invalid-url Source0: dbus-cli-20120227.tar.xz
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
- svn snapshot

Scratch build: ok, http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3827843

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 797145] Review Request: eclipse-slice2java - A plugin that integrates Eclipse with Ice object middleware

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797145

Roland Grunberg  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #5 from Roland Grunberg  2012-02-28 09:40:49 
EST ---
FWIW, It doesn't seem like those sections affect the build as they're ignored.
Setting as Approved.

I'm a bit unsure as to the procedure for this particular case, but according to
the relevant docs it's only necessary to state which branches you wish to have
unretired and set the fedora_cvs flag to '?'. From there it should be possible
to claim ownership of the branches in pkgdb. It may also be necessary to open a
ticket with rel-eng to unblock the package in the next release.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 738746] Review Request: rubygem-coffee-script-source - A package for the coffee-script-source Ruby gem

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738746

--- Comment #6 from Fotios Lindiakos  2012-02-28 09:47:58 
EST ---
Updated the package to build against rawhide and Ruby 1.9.1. Links to updated
files are included. I also successfully build the package in koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3827994

SPEC:
https://raw.github.com/fotioslindiakos/rubygem-all/master/SPECS/rubygem-coffee-script-source.spec

SRPM:
https://github.com/fotioslindiakos/rubygem-all/raw/master/SRPMS/rubygem-coffee-script-source-1.2.0-1.fc16.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 767762] Review Request: PyQt4-webkit - Python bindings for QtWebkit

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767762

Rex Dieter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|767714  |

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 767762] Review Request: PyQt4-webkit - Python bindings for QtWebkit

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767762

Rex Dieter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|767714  |

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 790531] Review Request: PyQt4-webkit - Python bindings for Qt4 Webkit package epel 6

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790531

Rex Dieter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||767714

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 790531] Review Request: PyQt4-webkit - Python bindings for Qt4 Webkit package epel 6

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790531

Rex Dieter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu

--- Comment #10 from Rex Dieter  2012-02-28 09:50:32 EST 
---
*** Bug 767762 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 767762] Review Request: PyQt4-webkit - Python bindings for QtWebkit

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767762

Rex Dieter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution||DUPLICATE
Last Closed||2012-02-28 09:50:32

--- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter  2012-02-28 09:50:32 EST 
---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 790531 ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 767762] Review Request: PyQt4-webkit - Python bindings for QtWebkit

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767762

Rex Dieter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution||DUPLICATE
Last Closed||2012-02-28 09:50:32

--- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter  2012-02-28 09:50:32 EST 
---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 790531 ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 790172] Review Request: jinput - Java Game Controller API

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790172

Andrew Robinson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||arobi...@redhat.com
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|arobi...@redhat.com

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Robinson  2012-02-28 09:57:35 
EST ---
I'll take a look at this.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 784657] Review Request: python-mozbase - the Mozilla suite of Python utilities

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784657

Jiri Moskovcak  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-review+

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 784657] Review Request: python-mozbase - the Mozilla suite of Python utilities

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784657

--- Comment #5 from Jiri Moskovcak  2012-02-28 10:13:37 
EST ---
OK: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.
-  W: invalid-url Source0: mozilla-mozbase-mozilla-central-25-gb077641.zip -
it's a git snapshot, url is provided in comment
OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] .
OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines .
OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
N/A: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.[4]
OK: The spec file must be written in American English.
OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no
upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this.
OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of
those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
N/A: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9]
N/A: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files
(not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call
ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10]
OK: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.[11]
N/A: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this
fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation
of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a
blocker.
OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a
directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that
directory.
OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings.
OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with
executable permissions, for example.
OK: Each package must consistently use macros. [16]
OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17]
N/A: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of
large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to
size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [18]
OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of
the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly
if it is not present. [18]
N/A: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [19]
N/A: Development files must be in a -devel package. [20]
N/A: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} =
%{version}-%{release} [21]
OK: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed
in the spec if they are built.[19]
N/A: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file,
and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need
a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation.
[22]
OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages.
The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the
files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for
example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the
files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that
you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns,
then please present that at package review time. [23]
OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.

= SHOULD =
- package doesn't contain the licence file
- man pages are missing

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-revie

[Bug 754583] Review Request: dnssec-trigger - Update/reconfigure DNSSEC resolving

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754583

Paul Wouters  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 784657] Review Request: python-mozbase - the Mozilla suite of Python utilities

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784657

Karel Klíč  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #6 from Karel Klíč  2012-02-28 10:21:12 EST ---
Thanks for the review.

New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: python-mozbase
Short Description: The Mozilla suite of Python utilities
Owners: kklic
Branches: f16 f17 el6
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 748017] Review Request: lookup - A graphical tool to search DNS for answers

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748017

Paul Wouters  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE
Last Closed||2012-02-28 10:23:57

--- Comment #11 from Paul Wouters  2012-02-28 10:23:57 EST 
---
Wes forgot to close the review bug

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 784657] Review Request: python-mozbase - the Mozilla suite of Python utilities

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784657

--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla  2012-02-28 10:32:28 EST 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 754583] Review Request: dnssec-trigger - Update/reconfigure DNSSEC resolving

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754583

--- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla  2012-02-28 10:33:50 EST 
---
Already exists, please use a Package Change request instead of New Package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 711899] Review Request: opendnssec - DNSSEC key and zone management software

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711899

--- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla  2012-02-28 10:41:41 EST 
---
Ok, when there is, link to it here and I'll take it, so we can get it in and
proceed with this.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 608852] Review Request: epris - a dbus service to listen to music

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608852

--- Comment #34 from Jon Ciesla  2012-02-28 10:53:07 EST 
---
Ping?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 648053] Review Request: libMicro - Portable micro-benchmarks for various system and library calls

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648053

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||WONTFIX
Last Closed||2012-02-28 10:55:25

--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla  2012-02-28 10:55:25 EST 
---
Closing due to lack of submitter response, if you still wish to get this
package into Fedora please submit a new review.  Thanks!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860

--- Comment #17 from Nikos Roussos  2012-02-28 11:25:16 
EST ---
cp: cannot stat `README.Fedora': No such file or directory

You have to include README.Fedora on src.rpm and add it on SOURCES on spec. See
a spec example on how to do it:
http://comzeradd.fedorapeople.org/specs/idjc.spec

Fix this and I think the package is ready for review and approval

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 673792] Review Request: mingw-crt - MinGW Windows cross-compiler runtime

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673792

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

Bug 673792 depends on bug 673784, which changed state.

Bug 673784 Summary: Rename Request: mingw32-filesystem -> mingw-filesystem - 
Cross compiler base filesystem and environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673784

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Resolution||ERRATA
 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 673790] Review Request: mingw-headers - MinGW Windows cross-compiler header files

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673790

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

Bug 673790 depends on bug 673784, which changed state.

Bug 673784 Summary: Rename Request: mingw32-filesystem -> mingw-filesystem - 
Cross compiler base filesystem and environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673784

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Resolution||ERRATA
 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 673790] Review Request: mingw-headers - MinGW Windows cross-compiler header files

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673790

--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System  
2012-02-28 11:52:04 EST ---
mingw-antlr-2.7.7-8.fc17,mingw-crt-2.0.999-0.4.trunk.20120224.fc17,mingw-filesystem-95-2.fc17,mingw-ftplib-3.1-5.fc17,mingw-gdb-7.3-3.fc17,mingw-goocanvas2-2.0.1-3.fc17,mingw-gstreamer-0.10.35-4.fc17,mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.35-3.fc17,mingw-gtk3-3.3.16-1.fc17,mingw-gtkmm30-3.2.0-4.fc17,mingw-gtksourceview3-3.2.0-4.fc17,mingw-headers-2.0.999-0.4.trunk.20120224.fc17,mingw-icu-4.8.1.1-4.fc17,mingw-libjpeg-turbo-1.1.1-7.fc17,mingw-libtasn1-2.9-4.fc17,mingw-libvorbis-1.3.2-4.fc17,mingw-p11-kit-0.10-2.fc17,mingw-pkg-config-0.26-4.fc17,mingw-win-iconv-0.0.3-6.fc17,mingw-wxWidgets-2.8.12-9.fc17,mingw32-SDL-1.2.13-12.fc17,mingw32-SDL_image-1.2.12-2.fc17,mingw32-SDL_mixer-1.2.11-5.fc17,mingw32-atk-2.2.0-3.fc17,mingw32-atkmm-2.22.6-1.fc17,mingw32-binutils-2.22.52-1.fc17,mingw32-boost-1.48.0-4.fc17,mingw32-bzip2-1.0.5-11.fc17,mingw32-cairo-1.10.2-9.fc17,mingw32-cairomm-1.10.0-4.fc17,mingw32-celt051-0.5.1.3-6.fc17,mingw32-cppunit-1.12.1-7.fc17,mingw32-crossreport-8-1.fc17,mingw3!
 
2-curl-7.20.1-5.fc17,mingw32-cxxtest-3.10.1-7.fc17,mingw32-dbus-1.4.6-3.fc17,mingw32-dirac-1.0.2-6.fc17,mingw32-dlfcn-0-0.11.r11.fc17,mingw32-enchant-1.6.0-3.fc17,mingw32-expat-2.0.1-9.fc17,mingw32-fontconfig-2.8.0-4.fc17,mingw32-freeglut-2.6.0-0.4.rc1.fc17,mingw32-freetype-2.4.8-2.fc17,mingw32-gcc-4.7.0-0.5.20120224.fc17,mingw32-gdbm-1.8.0-8.fc17,mingw32-gdk-pixbuf-2.25.2-3.fc17,mingw32-gettext-0.18.1.1-5.fc17,mingw32-glib-networking-2.31.16-1.fc17,mingw32-glib2-2.31.18-1.fc17,mingw32-glibmm24-2.31.2-3.fc17,mingw32-gnutls-2.12.14-4.fc17,mingw32-gtk-vnc-0.5.0-5.fc17,mingw32-gtk2-2.24.10-2.fc17,mingw32-gtkhtml3-3.32.2-5.fc17,mingw32-gtkmm24-2.24.2-4.fc17,mingw32-hunspell-1.3.2-3.fc17,mingw32-jasper-1.900.1-15.fc17,mingw32-libffi-3.0.9-4.fc17,mingw32-libgcrypt-1.4.4-7.fc17,mingw32-libgeotiff-1.3.0-0.4.svn1664.fc17,mingw32-libglade2-2.6.4-11.fc17,mingw32-libglademm24-2.6.7-14.fc17,mingw32-libgnurx-2.5.1-9.fc17,mingw32-libgpg-error-1.6-16.fc17,mingw32-libidn-1.14-11.fc17,mingw3!
 2-libltdl-2.4-5.fc17,mingw32-libogg-1.1.4-5.fc17,mingw32-liboi!
 l-0.3.16
-5.fc17,mingw32-libp11-0.2.8-3.fc17,mingw32-libpng-1.5.7-2.fc17,mingw32-libsigc++20-2.2.10-4.fc17,mingw32-libsigsegv-2.6-4.fc17,mingw32-libsoup-2.37.90-1.fc17,mingw32-libsqlite3x-20071018-14.fc17,mingw32-libssh2-1.1-8.fc17,mingw32-libtiff-3.9.5-4.fc17,mingw32-libvirt-0.9.10-2.fc17,mingw32-libxml++-2.34.2-4.fc17,mingw32-libxml2-2.7.8-4.fc17,mingw32-libxslt-1.1.26-6.fc17,mingw32-libzip-0.9-5.fc17,mingw32-matahari-0.5.0-1.fc17.3,mingw32-nsis-2.46-6.fc17,mingw32-nsiswrapper-9-2.fc17,mingw32-openjpeg-1.3-8.fc17,mingw32-opensc-0.12.2-3.fc17,mingw32-openssl-1.0.0d-3.fc17,mingw32-pango-1.29.5-2.fc17,mingw32-pangomm-2.28.3-4.fc17,mingw32-pcre-8.10-6.fc17,mingw32-pdcurses-3.4-10.fc17,mingw32-pixman-0.24.4-1.fc17,mingw32-plotmm-0.1.2-12.fc17,mingw32-portablexdr-4.9.1-5.fc17,mingw32-proj-4.6.1-7.fc17,mingw32-pthreads-2.8.0-17.20110511cvs.fc17,mingw32-qpid-cpp-0.14-1.fc17,mingw32-qt-4.8.0-5.fc17,mingw32-qt-qmake-4.8.0-4.fc17,mingw32-qwt-5.2.1-5.fc17,mingw32-readline-5.2-10.fc17,mingw32-s!
 
igar-1.6.5-0.7.git58097d9.fc17,mingw32-spice-protocol-0.8.0-3.fc17,mingw32-sqlite-3.7.9-2.fc17,mingw32-srvany-1.0-7.fc17,mingw32-tcl-8.5.11-2.fc17,mingw32-termcap-1.3.1-11.fc17,mingw32-tk-8.5.9-4.fc17,mingw32-webkitgtk-1.7.5-5.fc17,mingw32-wpcap-4.1.final2-5.fc17,mingw32-xerces-c-3.1.1-3.fc17,mingw32-zfstream-20041202-11.fc17,mingw32-zlib-1.2.5-8.fc17
has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw-antlr-2.7.7-8.fc17,mingw-crt-2.0.999-0.4.trunk.20120224.fc17,mingw-filesystem-95-2.fc17,mingw-ftplib-3.1-5.fc17,mingw-gdb-7.3-3.fc17,mingw-goocanvas2-2.0.1-3.fc17,mingw-gstreamer-0.10.35-4.fc17,mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.35-3.fc17,mingw-gtk3-3.3.16-1.fc17,mingw-gtkmm30-3.2.0-4.fc17,mingw-gtksourceview3-3.2.0-4.fc17,mingw-headers-2.0.999-0.4.trunk.20120224.fc17,mingw-icu-4.8.1.1-4.fc17,mingw-libjpeg-turbo-1.1.1-7.fc17,mingw-libtasn1-2.9-4.fc17,mingw-libvorbis-1.3.2-4.fc17,mingw-p11-kit-0.10-2.fc17,mingw-pkg-config-0.26-4.fc17,mingw-win-iconv-0.0.3-6.fc17,mingw-wxWidgets-2.8.12-9.fc17,mingw32-SDL-1.2.13-12.fc17,mingw32-SDL_image-1.2.12-2.fc17,mingw32-SDL_mixer-1.2.11-5.fc17,mingw32-atk-2.2.0-3.fc17,mingw32-atkmm-2.22.6-1.fc17,mingw32-binutils-2.22.52-1.fc17,mingw32-boost-1.48.0-4.fc17,mingw32-bzip2-1.0.5-11.fc17,mingw32-cairo-1.10.2-9.fc17,mingw32-cairomm-1.10.0-4.fc17,mingw32-celt051-0.5.1.3-6.fc17,mingw32-cppunit-1.12.1-7.!
 
fc17,mingw32-crossreport-8-1.fc17,mingw32-curl-7.20.1-5.fc17,mingw32-cxxtest-3.10.1-7.fc17,mingw32-dbus-1.4.6-3.fc17,mingw32-dirac-1.0.2-6.fc17,mingw32-dlfcn-0-0.11.r11.fc17,mingw32-enchant-1.6.0-3.fc17,mingw32-expat-2.0.1-9.fc17,mingw32-fontconfig-2.8.0-4.fc17,mingw32-freeglut-2.6.0-0.4.rc1.fc17,mingw32-freety

[Bug 673792] Review Request: mingw-crt - MinGW Windows cross-compiler runtime

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673792

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  
2012-02-28 11:51:57 EST ---
mingw-antlr-2.7.7-8.fc17,mingw-crt-2.0.999-0.4.trunk.20120224.fc17,mingw-filesystem-95-2.fc17,mingw-ftplib-3.1-5.fc17,mingw-gdb-7.3-3.fc17,mingw-goocanvas2-2.0.1-3.fc17,mingw-gstreamer-0.10.35-4.fc17,mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.35-3.fc17,mingw-gtk3-3.3.16-1.fc17,mingw-gtkmm30-3.2.0-4.fc17,mingw-gtksourceview3-3.2.0-4.fc17,mingw-headers-2.0.999-0.4.trunk.20120224.fc17,mingw-icu-4.8.1.1-4.fc17,mingw-libjpeg-turbo-1.1.1-7.fc17,mingw-libtasn1-2.9-4.fc17,mingw-libvorbis-1.3.2-4.fc17,mingw-p11-kit-0.10-2.fc17,mingw-pkg-config-0.26-4.fc17,mingw-win-iconv-0.0.3-6.fc17,mingw-wxWidgets-2.8.12-9.fc17,mingw32-SDL-1.2.13-12.fc17,mingw32-SDL_image-1.2.12-2.fc17,mingw32-SDL_mixer-1.2.11-5.fc17,mingw32-atk-2.2.0-3.fc17,mingw32-atkmm-2.22.6-1.fc17,mingw32-binutils-2.22.52-1.fc17,mingw32-boost-1.48.0-4.fc17,mingw32-bzip2-1.0.5-11.fc17,mingw32-cairo-1.10.2-9.fc17,mingw32-cairomm-1.10.0-4.fc17,mingw32-celt051-0.5.1.3-6.fc17,mingw32-cppunit-1.12.1-7.fc17,mingw32-crossreport-8-1.fc17,mingw3!
 
2-curl-7.20.1-5.fc17,mingw32-cxxtest-3.10.1-7.fc17,mingw32-dbus-1.4.6-3.fc17,mingw32-dirac-1.0.2-6.fc17,mingw32-dlfcn-0-0.11.r11.fc17,mingw32-enchant-1.6.0-3.fc17,mingw32-expat-2.0.1-9.fc17,mingw32-fontconfig-2.8.0-4.fc17,mingw32-freeglut-2.6.0-0.4.rc1.fc17,mingw32-freetype-2.4.8-2.fc17,mingw32-gcc-4.7.0-0.5.20120224.fc17,mingw32-gdbm-1.8.0-8.fc17,mingw32-gdk-pixbuf-2.25.2-3.fc17,mingw32-gettext-0.18.1.1-5.fc17,mingw32-glib-networking-2.31.16-1.fc17,mingw32-glib2-2.31.18-1.fc17,mingw32-glibmm24-2.31.2-3.fc17,mingw32-gnutls-2.12.14-4.fc17,mingw32-gtk-vnc-0.5.0-5.fc17,mingw32-gtk2-2.24.10-2.fc17,mingw32-gtkhtml3-3.32.2-5.fc17,mingw32-gtkmm24-2.24.2-4.fc17,mingw32-hunspell-1.3.2-3.fc17,mingw32-jasper-1.900.1-15.fc17,mingw32-libffi-3.0.9-4.fc17,mingw32-libgcrypt-1.4.4-7.fc17,mingw32-libgeotiff-1.3.0-0.4.svn1664.fc17,mingw32-libglade2-2.6.4-11.fc17,mingw32-libglademm24-2.6.7-14.fc17,mingw32-libgnurx-2.5.1-9.fc17,mingw32-libgpg-error-1.6-16.fc17,mingw32-libidn-1.14-11.fc17,mingw3!
 2-libltdl-2.4-5.fc17,mingw32-libogg-1.1.4-5.fc17,mingw32-liboi!
 l-0.3.16
-5.fc17,mingw32-libp11-0.2.8-3.fc17,mingw32-libpng-1.5.7-2.fc17,mingw32-libsigc++20-2.2.10-4.fc17,mingw32-libsigsegv-2.6-4.fc17,mingw32-libsoup-2.37.90-1.fc17,mingw32-libsqlite3x-20071018-14.fc17,mingw32-libssh2-1.1-8.fc17,mingw32-libtiff-3.9.5-4.fc17,mingw32-libvirt-0.9.10-2.fc17,mingw32-libxml++-2.34.2-4.fc17,mingw32-libxml2-2.7.8-4.fc17,mingw32-libxslt-1.1.26-6.fc17,mingw32-libzip-0.9-5.fc17,mingw32-matahari-0.5.0-1.fc17.3,mingw32-nsis-2.46-6.fc17,mingw32-nsiswrapper-9-2.fc17,mingw32-openjpeg-1.3-8.fc17,mingw32-opensc-0.12.2-3.fc17,mingw32-openssl-1.0.0d-3.fc17,mingw32-pango-1.29.5-2.fc17,mingw32-pangomm-2.28.3-4.fc17,mingw32-pcre-8.10-6.fc17,mingw32-pdcurses-3.4-10.fc17,mingw32-pixman-0.24.4-1.fc17,mingw32-plotmm-0.1.2-12.fc17,mingw32-portablexdr-4.9.1-5.fc17,mingw32-proj-4.6.1-7.fc17,mingw32-pthreads-2.8.0-17.20110511cvs.fc17,mingw32-qpid-cpp-0.14-1.fc17,mingw32-qt-4.8.0-5.fc17,mingw32-qt-qmake-4.8.0-4.fc17,mingw32-qwt-5.2.1-5.fc17,mingw32-readline-5.2-10.fc17,mingw32-s!
 
igar-1.6.5-0.7.git58097d9.fc17,mingw32-spice-protocol-0.8.0-3.fc17,mingw32-sqlite-3.7.9-2.fc17,mingw32-srvany-1.0-7.fc17,mingw32-tcl-8.5.11-2.fc17,mingw32-termcap-1.3.1-11.fc17,mingw32-tk-8.5.9-4.fc17,mingw32-webkitgtk-1.7.5-5.fc17,mingw32-wpcap-4.1.final2-5.fc17,mingw32-xerces-c-3.1.1-3.fc17,mingw32-zfstream-20041202-11.fc17,mingw32-zlib-1.2.5-8.fc17
has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw-antlr-2.7.7-8.fc17,mingw-crt-2.0.999-0.4.trunk.20120224.fc17,mingw-filesystem-95-2.fc17,mingw-ftplib-3.1-5.fc17,mingw-gdb-7.3-3.fc17,mingw-goocanvas2-2.0.1-3.fc17,mingw-gstreamer-0.10.35-4.fc17,mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.35-3.fc17,mingw-gtk3-3.3.16-1.fc17,mingw-gtkmm30-3.2.0-4.fc17,mingw-gtksourceview3-3.2.0-4.fc17,mingw-headers-2.0.999-0.4.trunk.20120224.fc17,mingw-icu-4.8.1.1-4.fc17,mingw-libjpeg-turbo-1.1.1-7.fc17,mingw-libtasn1-2.9-4.fc17,mingw-libvorbis-1.3.2-4.fc17,mingw-p11-kit-0.10-2.fc17,mingw-pkg-config-0.26-4.fc17,mingw-win-iconv-0.0.3-6.fc17,mingw-wxWidgets-2.8.12-9.fc17,mingw32-SDL-1.2.13-12.fc17,mingw32-SDL_image-1.2.12-2.fc17,mingw32-SDL_mixer-1.2.11-5.fc17,mingw32-atk-2.2.0-3.fc17,mingw32-atkmm-2.22.6-1.fc17,mingw32-binutils-2.22.52-1.fc17,mingw32-boost-1.48.0-4.fc17,mingw32-bzip2-1.0.5-11.fc17,mingw32-cairo-1.10.2-9.fc17,mingw32-cairomm-1.10.0-4.fc17,mingw32-celt051-0.5.1.3-6.fc17,mingw32-cppunit-1.12.1-7.!
 
fc17,mingw32-crossreport-8-1.fc17,mingw32-curl-7.20.1-5.fc17,mingw32-cxxtest-3.10.1-7.fc17,mingw32-dbus-1.4.6-3.fc17,mingw32-dirac-1.0.2-6.fc17,mingw32-dlfcn-0-0.11.r11.fc17,mingw32-enchant-1.6.0-3.fc17,mingw32-expat-2.0.1-9.fc17,mingw32-fontconfig-2.8.0-4.fc17,mingw32-freeglut-2.6.0-0.4.rc1.fc17,mingw32-freety

[Bug 794990] Review Request: get-flash-videos - CLI tool to download flash video from websites

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794990

--- Comment #9 from Alec Leamas  2012-02-28 11:58:39 EST 
---
It's probably best to close it here, agreed. Sorry for taking your time w this.
--a

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 784657] Review Request: python-mozbase - the Mozilla suite of Python utilities

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784657

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  
2012-02-28 12:05:34 EST ---
python-mozbase-0-0.3.gitb077641.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-mozbase-0-0.3.gitb077641.el6

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 784657] Review Request: python-mozbase - the Mozilla suite of Python utilities

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784657

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

  1   2   >