[Bug 760594] Review Request: simcrs - C++ Simulated Travel-Oriented Distribution System Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760594 --- Comment #3 from Denis Arnaud 2012-03-02 02:56:46 EST --- Thanks for the review, Matthias! Of course, the spec file name will change to be simcrs.spec (in the Fedora Git repository). In fact, I use a symbolic link (from simcrs.spec to simcrs-0.1.1-1.spec) and it is enough for rpmlint to be happy when hacking with rpmbuild. I generally prefer stating explicitly the version number in the spec file name when located on my FedoraPeople's account, as it is easier to spot the right file to use. [In the future, I will use my GitHub account, and therefore use Git to version the spec file] Then, you are of course right, the source tar-ball mismatch is not good. I have forgotten to update the tar-ball on FedoraPeople with a latest update. Sorry. I will deliver a new version this week-end. Thanks again Denis -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 799023] Review Request: eot-utils - Tools to convert OTF/TTF to EOT font format + show its metadata
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799023 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) 2012-03-02 03:44:13 EST --- Review: - koji build failed (f17) ->http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3845922 + source verified with upstream as (sha1sum) 7e8a68ba1ae4b533113e7965aa2cca133367f31f eot-utilities-1.1.tar.gz 7e8a68ba1ae4b533113e7965aa2cca133367f31f ../SOURCES/eot-utilities-1.1.tar.gz Suggestions: 1) you need to remove autoreconf from %build as this will pass the scratch build on koji. 2) install section change from rm -rf -- $RPM_BUILD_ROOT make install-strip DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT to make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 798891] Review Request: libtranslit - transliteration library with multiple backends
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798891 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) 2012-03-02 03:58:06 EST --- Review: + koji build (f17) ->http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3845925 + rpmlint on rpms gave libtranslit.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) backends -> back ends, back-ends, backhands libtranslit.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US backends -> back ends, back-ends, backhands libtranslit.x86_64: W: no-documentation libtranslit.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libtranslit/modules/libtranslitm17n.so libtranslit.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) backends -> back ends, back-ends, backhands libtranslit.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US backends -> back ends, back-ends, backhands 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. + source verified with upstream as (sha1sum) ea9dbe0b4d2bd9495394df307b385686eaffa7a7 ../SOURCES/libtranslit-0.0.1.tar.gz ea9dbe0b4d2bd9495394df307b385686eaffa7a7 libtranslit-0.0.1.tar.gz + package follows packaging guidelines. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 798891] Review Request: libtranslit - transliteration library with multiple backends
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798891 Daiki Ueno changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Daiki Ueno 2012-03-02 04:05:23 EST --- Thanks for the review, Parag. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: libtranslit Short Description: transliteration library with multiple backends Owners: ueno Branches: f17 f16 f15 InitialCC: i18n-team -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 750911] Review Request: moconti - Web Application Server for Sleep
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750911 Tomas Radej changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|tra...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 794725] Review Request: txw2 - Typed XML writer for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794725 --- Comment #3 from Juan Hernández 2012-03-02 04:43:02 EST --- Fixed issue #1 and added comments for the patches. The new spec and SRPM are available here: http://jhernand.fedorapeople.org/rpms/txw2/20110809-3 An scratch build is available here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3846034 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 796201] Review Request: glassfish-jaxb - JAXB Reference Implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796201 --- Comment #1 from Juan Hernández 2012-03-02 04:50:22 EST --- The spec needed some minor updates after changing the names of the jar files in txw2. The new spec and SRPM are available here: http://jhernand.fedorapeople.org/rpms/glassfish-jaxb/2.2.4u1-3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790564] Review Request: glassfish-fi - Fast Infoset
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790564 Juan Hernández changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |glassfish-fi - |glassfish-fi - Fast Infoset |Development/Libraries | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 798657] Review Request: perl-Test-Moose-More - More tools for testing Moose packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798657 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Test-Moose-More-0.005- ||1.fc18 Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2012-03-02 04:51:56 --- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar 2012-03-02 04:51:56 EST --- Thank you for the review and the repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 798741] Review Request: perl-WebService-Rajce - Perl interface for www.rajce.idnes.cz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798741 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||perl-WebService-Rajce-0.07- ||1.fc18 --- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar 2012-03-02 04:59:02 EST --- I corrected the descriptions. Thank you for the review and the reporitory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 798741] Review Request: perl-WebService-Rajce - Perl interface for www.rajce.idnes.cz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798741 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2012-03-02 05:05:20 EST --- perl-WebService-Rajce-0.07-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-WebService-Rajce-0.07-1.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 798741] Review Request: perl-WebService-Rajce - Perl interface for www.rajce.idnes.cz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798741 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2012-03-02 05:03:37 EST --- perl-WebService-Rajce-0.07-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-WebService-Rajce-0.07-1.fc17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 510962] Review Request: pypoppler - Python bindings for the Poppler PDF rendering library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510962 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||794970 Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Fabian Affolter 2012-03-02 05:31:53 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: pypoppler New Branches: el6 Owners: fab -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606421] Review Request: quickfix - Open Source FIX Engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606421 --- Comment #21 from Martin Dengler 2012-03-02 05:33:46 EST --- I've updated the package for F16, which builds fine ( http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3846127 ) ...I've uploaded the SRPM and patches to http://www.martindengler.com/proj/quickfix/build-20120210 and http://www.martindengler.com/proj/quickfix/build-20120210 , respectively, in case anyone wants to try it out. I am going to rip out the included unittest code this weekend and hopefully that will finish this off. I will clear the whiteboard. If there is anything else people know they would like me to see for the review then please let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 788630] Review Request: plexus-pom - Root Plexus Projects pom
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788630 --- Comment #8 from Stanislav Ochotnicky 2012-03-02 05:48:34 EST --- Please remember to close these bugs after the builds (or if you are planning on putting it to F16+, add them as bugs to bodhi updates so they get closed automatically) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 799171] Review Request: openvswitch - multi-layer software switch (userspace components)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799171 Daniel Berrange changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||berra...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|berra...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 799171] Review Request: openvswitch - multi-layer software switch (userspace components)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799171
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Berrange 2012-03-02 06:16:22
EST ---
PASS MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.[1]
openvswitch.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) vSwitch -> v Switch, switch,
vs witch
openvswitch.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US vSwitch -> v Switch,
switch, vs witch
openvswitch.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) vSwitch -> v Switch,
switch, vs witch
openvswitch.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US vSwitch -> v
Switch, switch, vs witch
openvswitch.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
python-openvswitch.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) vSwitch -> v
Switch, switch, vs witch
python-openvswitch.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US vSwitch -> v
Switch, switch, vs witch
ovsdbmonitor.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) vSwitch -> v Switch,
switch, vs witch
ovsdbmonitor.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US vSwitch -> v
Switch, switch, vs witch
ovsdbmonitor.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ovs -> obs, ova,
vs
ovsdbmonitor.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dpctl -> pct
ovsdbmonitor.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US vsctl -> scuttle
openvswitch-test.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) vSwitch -> v Switch,
switch, vs witch
openvswitch-test.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US vSwitch -> v
Switch, switch, vs witch
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 14 warnings.
PASS MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
.
PASS MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the
format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] .
PASS MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
PASS MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines .
FAIL MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license. [3]
The spec says
# Nearly all of openvswitch is ASL 2.0. The bugtool is LGPLv2+, and the
# lib/sflow*.[ch] files are SISSL
License:ASL 2.0 and LGPLv2+ and SISSL
This is not quite the whole story
python/compat/uuid.py : PYTHON SOFTWARE FOUNDATION LICENSE VERSION 2
datapath/linux/compat/flex_array.c: GPLv2+
datapath/dp_notify.c: GPLv2-only (and more files)
There are a number of files which have no license header, which upstream
should be encouraged to fix
I browsed license headers with:
$ find -name *.c | xargs head -30 | less
$ find -name *.py | xargs head -30 | less
PASS MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4]
PASS MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5]
PASS MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6]
PASS MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task.
If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this.
3847c60af329bfe81ff7220b9f489fa5 openvswitch-1.4.0.tar.gz
3847c60af329bfe81ff7220b9f489fa5 rpmbuild/SOURCES/openvswitch-1.4.0.tar.gz
PASS MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture. [7]
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3846220
N/A MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8]
PASS MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for
any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
N/A MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9]
N/A MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10]
PASS MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.[11]
N/A MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered
[Bug 799284] New: Review Request: perl-Pod-Plainer - Perl extension for converting Pod to old-style Pod
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pod-Plainer - Perl extension for converting Pod to old-style Pod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799284 Summary: Review Request: perl-Pod-Plainer - Perl extension for converting Pod to old-style Pod Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xn...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/64704553/perl-pod-plainer.spec SRPM URL: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/64704553/perl-Pod-Plainer-1.03-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: Pod::Plainer uses Pod::Parser which takes Pod with the (new) 'C<< .. >>' constructs and returns the old(er) style with just 'C<>'; '<' and '>' are replaced by 'E' and 'E'. This can be used to pre-process Pod before using tools which do not recognise the new style Pods. This my second package. But I also need a sponsor. Thanks a lot. This package is required to support LSB 4.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 799023] Review Request: eot-utils - Tools to convert OTF/TTF to EOT font format + show its metadata
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799023 --- Comment #2 from Jan Pokorny 2012-03-02 06:50:07 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) > 1) you need to remove autoreconf from %build as this will pass > the scratch build on koji. Agreed, I've just found [1] and it works well for me without it in the mock environment. (Otherwise, these BuildRequires would be needed: autoconf, automake, m4.) > 2) install section change from > rm -rf -- $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > make install-strip DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT > to > make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" The removal command comes from rpmdev-newspec. If this is not needed or it serves only to ensure everything is rebuilt properly when building locally, bug against rpmdevtools should be filed. Re: INSTALL="install -p" ... agreed. Re: install-strip -> install: I got it, it is a matter of postprocessing that will create separate debuginfo package and actually strip the binaries. (Interestingly, "install-strip" will not do the stripping in this case either.) [1] http://stackoverflow.com/a/7754416 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 784591] Review Request: glazedlists - A Java toolkit for transformations in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784591 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Mary Ellen Foster 2012-03-02 07:16:31 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: glazedlists Short Description: A toolkit for transformations in Java Owners:mef Branches: f17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 510962] Review Request: pypoppler - Python bindings for the Poppler PDF rendering library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510962 --- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla 2012-03-02 07:56:03 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 797694] Review Request: Farstream - Libraries for videoconferencing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797694 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla 2012-03-02 07:59:13 EST --- That was part of it. It still thinks you want 'InitialCC' as a branch, but I can work around that. My larger concern is that the name in the SCM request and summary don't match, should it be capitalized or not? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 798891] Review Request: libtranslit - transliteration library with multiple backends
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798891 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2012-03-02 07:59:51 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 784591] Review Request: glazedlists - A Java toolkit for transformations in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784591 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla 2012-03-02 07:56:44 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551765] Review Request: prosody - Flexible communications server for Jabber/XMPP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551765 Bug 551765 depends on bug 551763, which changed state. Bug 551763 Summary: Review Request: lua-sec - Lua binding for OpenSSL library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551763 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution|WONTFIX | Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551763] Review Request: lua-sec - Lua binding for OpenSSL library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551763 Matěj Cepl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | AssignedTo|a...@spicenitz.org |mc...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? Keywords||Reopened --- Comment #19 from Matěj Cepl 2012-03-02 08:01:06 EST --- In view of comment 18, reopening this bug and taking over the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 738744] Review Request: rubygem-execjs - A package for the execjs Ruby gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738744 --- Comment #5 from Vít Ondruch 2012-03-02 08:01:57 EST --- * F17/Rawhide - I see that you are already using ruby(abi) = 1.9.1, i.e. you are building for Ruby 1.9.3 in F17/Rawhide, in that case, you should follow the new guidelines [1]. BTW I placed .spec file updated according to the new guidelines here [2]. * Tests do not run - There is reported "test/test_execjs.rb: cannot load such file -- multi_json" error. It should be fixed by adding: BuildRequires: rubygem(multi_json) => 1.0 BuildRequires: rubygem(multi_json) < 2 - After adding the BR, it fails anyway with message: "Could not find a JavaScript runtime. See https://github.com/sstephenson/execjs for a list of available runtimes." So there should be BR some supported JS engine (spidermonkey?) or better all engines available in Fedora. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Ruby [2] http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-execjs.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 799023] Review Request: eot-utils - Tools to convert OTF/TTF to EOT font format + show its metadata
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799023 --- Comment #3 from Jan Pokorny 2012-03-02 08:12:16 EST --- Spec and SRPM available at the same URLs (the old version is in "old-v1"). I've also returned "meta-data" back to "metadata" (as in Summary) and use the form of RPM macros consistently. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3846459 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608852] Review Request: epris - a dbus service to listen to music
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608852 --- Comment #36 from Jon Ciesla 2012-03-02 09:08:43 EST --- Login to bodhi, https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/, and mark each update as stable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 784591] Review Request: glazedlists - A Java toolkit for transformations in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784591 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 784591] Review Request: glazedlists - A Java toolkit for transformations in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784591 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2012-03-02 09:10:43 EST --- glazedlists-1.8.0-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glazedlists-1.8.0-3.fc17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551763] Review Request: lua-sec - Lua binding for OpenSSL library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551763
--- Comment #20 from Matěj Cepl 2012-03-02 09:46:51 EST ---
Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable
+ MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review
$ rpmlint -i *.rpm
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$
+ MUST: package named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
changed from luasec to lua-sec to follow
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Lua
+ MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}
- MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
Per above mentioned Lua Packaging Guidelines spec file should contain
%if 0%{?fedora} >= 16 || 0%{?rhel} >= 7
Requires: lua(abi) = %{luaver}
%else
Requires: lua >= %{luaver}
%endif
+ MUST: The package licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines
+ MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual
license
MIT
+ MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.
LICENSE is included.
+ MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
+ MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
+ MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task
MD5: 712158d60207bdbb6215fc7e07d8db24
+ MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture - build in koji, no problems
0 MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch
+ MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines
Builds in koji (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3846510)
0 MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro
No locales are present.
0 MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
No libraries provided.
+ MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries
0 MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker
- MUST: Package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create
a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create
that directory
Missing explicit requirement of lua package (which owns %{luapkgdir} used by
package).
+ MUST: Package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files
listings
+ MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ MUST: Each package must consistently use macros
+ MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content
0 MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage
+ MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
of the application
0 MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package
0 MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package
0 MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'
0 MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1),
then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package
0 MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
+ MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be
removed in the spec if they are built
0 MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section
+ MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages
- MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
+ MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8
Just a nitpicks:
- please fix lua requirement as shown above.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 794725] Review Request: txw2 - Typed XML writer for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794725 Andy Grimm changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Andy Grimm 2012-03-02 10:06:26 EST --- Looks good. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 798654] Review Request: cmpi-bindings - CMPI-compliant provider interface for various languages via SWIG
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798654 Jan Safranek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jsafr...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsafr...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jan Safranek 2012-03-02 10:24:46 EST --- Rpmlint output: cmpi-bindings.src: W: invalid-url Source0: cmpi-bindings-0.4.17.tar.bz2 This looks fine, upstream does not have a website. cmpi-bindings-pywbem.x86_64: W: no-documentation At least upstream README and LICENSE should be there. I'd appreciate also some README.Fedora which would specify, where python providers are expected. The package should create and own /usr/lib/pythonX.Y/site-packages/pycim directory. Otherwise, all MUST review items are OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 784592] Review Request: jpf - Java Plug-in Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784592 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183(FE-JAVASIG) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 799171] Review Request: openvswitch - multi-layer software switch (userspace components)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799171 Daniel Berrange changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 794725] Review Request: txw2 - Typed XML writer for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794725 Juan Hernández changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Juan Hernández 2012-03-02 10:46:02 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: txw2 Short Description: Typed XML writer for Java Owners: jhernand Branches: f17 InitialCC: goldmann -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 799171] Review Request: openvswitch - multi-layer software switch (userspace components)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799171
--- Comment #2 from Chris Wright 2012-03-02 10:49:33 EST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> PASS MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and
> meet
> the Licensing Guidelines .
>
> FAIL MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
> license. [3]
>
> The spec says
>
> # Nearly all of openvswitch is ASL 2.0. The bugtool is LGPLv2+, and the
> # lib/sflow*.[ch] files are SISSL
> License:ASL 2.0 and LGPLv2+ and SISSL
>
> This is not quite the whole story
>
> python/compat/uuid.py : PYTHON SOFTWARE FOUNDATION LICENSE VERSION 2
> datapath/linux/compat/flex_array.c: GPLv2+
> datapath/dp_notify.c: GPLv2-only (and more files)
Yes, thanks. I had completely put those out of my mind as they are not shpped
w/ the binary package. Only in the source.
> There are a number of files which have no license header, which upstream
> should be encouraged to fix
>
> I browsed license headers with:
>
> $ find -name *.c | xargs head -30 | less
> $ find -name *.py | xargs head -30 | less
I'll push some patches upstream.
> FAIL MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16]
>
> In the %files section there are alot of hardcoded paths, eg /usr/bin, /etc,
> /usr/share, etc. Replace these with %{bindir}, %{datadir}, etc
>
> Also avoid hardcoding '.gz' on the end of man page paths, eg replace
>
>%{_datadir}/man/man1/ovs-benchmark.1.gz
>
> with
>
>%{_datadir}/man/man1/ovs-benchmark.1*
For some reason I took that to simply mean consistent use of RPM_BUILD_ROOT vs
%{buildroot}. Easy to fix, thanks again.
I'll respin and update shortly.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 717502] Review Request: i4uc - IDE for developing micro-controllers firmware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717502 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 794725] Review Request: txw2 - Typed XML writer for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794725 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2012-03-02 11:16:45 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790172] Review Request: jinput - Java Game Controller API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790172 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790172] Review Request: jinput - Java Game Controller API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790172 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2012-03-02 11:20:42 EST --- jinput-2.0.6-1.20110801svn.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jinput-2.0.6-1.20110801svn.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790172] Review Request: jinput - Java Game Controller API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790172 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2012-03-02 11:20:32 EST --- jinput-2.0.6-1.20110801svn.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jinput-2.0.6-1.20110801svn.fc17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 799392] New: Review Request: geronimo-commonj - CommonJ Specification
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: geronimo-commonj - CommonJ Specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799392 Summary: Review Request: geronimo-commonj - CommonJ Specification Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: juan.hernan...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, agr...@gmail.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 652183 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://jhernand.fedorapeople.org/rpms/geronimo-commonj/1.1.0-2/geronimo-commonj.spec SRPM URL: http://jhernand.fedorapeople.org/rpms/geronimo-commonj/1.1.0-2/geronimo-commonj-1.1.0-2.fc17.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3846868 Description: Geronimo CommonJ Specification. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 796201] Review Request: glassfish-jaxb - JAXB Reference Implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796201 Bug 796201 depends on bug 794725, which changed state. Bug 794725 Summary: Review Request: txw2 - Typed XML writer for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794725 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 767050] Review Request: hibernate-validator - Bean Validation (JSR 303) Reference Implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767050 Bug 767050 depends on bug 794725, which changed state. Bug 794725 Summary: Review Request: txw2 - Typed XML writer for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794725 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 794725] Review Request: txw2 - Typed XML writer for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794725 Juan Hernández changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Blocks|652183(FE-JAVASIG) | Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2012-03-02 11:39:22 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 723752] Review Request: lrslib - Reverse search for vertex enumeration/convex hull problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723752 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 786587] Review Request: network-manager-applet - applet, editor, and private libs for NetworkManager GUI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786587 Dan Williams changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(jamie@tomoyolinux ||.co.uk) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 723752] Review Request: lrslib - Reverse search for vertex enumeration/convex hull problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723752 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2012-03-02 11:46:43 EST --- lrslib-4.2c-3.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lrslib-4.2c-3.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 723752] Review Request: lrslib - Reverse search for vertex enumeration/convex hull problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723752 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2012-03-02 11:46:35 EST --- lrslib-4.2c-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lrslib-4.2c-3.fc17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 733603] Review Request: sugar-ruler - Ruler is a simple collection of measurement tools that are displayed on the screen.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733603 Kalpa Welivitigoda changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #24 from Kalpa Welivitigoda 2012-03-02 11:47:08 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: sugar-ruler New Branches: f17 Owners: callkalpa InitialCC: pbrobinson -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 733603] Review Request: sugar-ruler - Ruler is a simple collection of measurement tools that are displayed on the screen.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733603 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #25 from Peter Robinson 2012-03-02 11:53:56 EST --- (In reply to comment #24) > Package Change Request > == > Package Name: sugar-ruler > New Branches: f17 > Owners: callkalpa > InitialCC: pbrobinson The branch is there, you just need to do a "git pull" to ensure it's pulled down locally. A "fedpkg switch-branch f17" should then work -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 717502] Review Request: i4uc - IDE for developing micro-controllers firmware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717502 Larry Letelier changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|g...@xofica.cl Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 750898] Review Request: icaro - A robot automation language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750898 Larry Letelier changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 750898] Review Request: icaro - A robot automation language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750898 Larry Letelier changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|g...@xofica.cl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 750898] Review Request: icaro - A robot automation language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750898 Larry Letelier changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 717502] Review Request: i4uc - IDE for developing micro-controllers firmware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717502 --- Comment #31 from Jon Ciesla 2012-03-02 12:21:46 EST --- Please include only valid FAS account names in InitialCC. gomix, please set fedora-review flag to +. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 717502] Review Request: i4uc - IDE for developing micro-controllers firmware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717502 --- Comment #32 from Larry Letelier 2012-03-02 12:31:02 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: i4uc Short Description: Multiple platform IDE for developing micro-controller firmware Owners: lletelier Branches: f15 f16 f17 InitialCC: Lletelier -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 786602] Review Request: picketbox-commons - PicketBox Commons
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786602 --- Comment #5 from Ricardo Arguello 2012-03-02 12:30:31 EST --- The picketbox-commons package was updated: Spec URL: http://ricardo.fedorapeople.org/package_review/picketbox-commons/3/picketbox-commons.spec SRPM URL: http://ricardo.fedorapeople.org/package_review/picketbox-commons/3/picketbox-commons-1.0.0-2.fc17.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 717502] Review Request: i4uc - IDE for developing micro-controllers firmware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717502 Larry Letelier changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 717502] Review Request: i4uc - IDE for developing micro-controllers firmware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717502 --- Comment #33 from Jon Ciesla 2012-03-02 12:37:43 EST --- FAS usernames are case-sensitive, wait for review to be + before resetting cvs flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 786587] Review Request: network-manager-applet - applet, editor, and private libs for NetworkManager GUI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786587 Jamie Nguyen changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(jamie@tomoyolinux | |.co.uk) | --- Comment #4 from Jamie Nguyen 2012-03-02 12:43:07 EST --- Hmm I couldn't build: $ mock --rebuild -r fedora-17-x86_64 network-manager-applet-0.9.2-2.fc17.src.rpm Config(fedora-17-x86_64) 0 minutes 17 seconds INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/fedora-17-x86_64/result ERROR: Command failed: # ['/usr/bin/yum-builddep', '--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/fedora-17-x86_64/root/', '/var/lib/mock/fedora-17-x86_64/root///builddir/build/SRPMS/network-manager-applet-0.9.2-2.fc17.src.rpm'] Getting requirements for network-manager-applet-0.9.2-2.fc17.src Error: No Package found for NetworkManager-devel = 1:0.9.2-2 Strangely, bumping nm_version to "1:0.9.3-0.2.git20120215" still causes the same No Package error and I'm not sure why. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 750898] Review Request: icaro - A robot automation language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750898 Peter Lemenkov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|g...@xofica.cl |lemen...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2012-03-02 12:45:55 EST --- I'll review it (and will sponsor you). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 750898] Review Request: icaro - A robot automation language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750898 Peter Lemenkov changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 717502] Review Request: i4uc - IDE for developing micro-controllers firmware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717502 --- Comment #34 from Larry Letelier 2012-03-02 12:47:23 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: i4uc Short Description: Multiple platform IDE for developing micro-controller firmware Owners: lletelier Branches: f15 f16 f17 InitialCC: lletelier -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 750898] Review Request: icaro - A robot automation language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750898 --- Comment #3 from Larry Letelier 2012-03-02 12:54:25 EST --- Thanks Peter, -- LL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 717502] Review Request: i4uc - IDE for developing micro-controllers firmware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717502 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 717502] Review Request: i4uc - IDE for developing micro-controllers firmware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717502 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 717502] Review Request: i4uc - IDE for developing micro-controllers firmware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717502 --- Comment #35 from Jon Ciesla 2012-03-02 13:08:28 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 797694] Review Request: Farstream - Libraries for videoconferencing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797694 Brian Pepple changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Brian Pepple 2012-03-02 13:13:29 EST --- Lowercase as the tarball & specfile is. Upstream refers to it capitalized in the titles of e-mails (1). Hence, I did the same in the summary. Anyway, the information in the request is how it should be set-up. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: farstream Short Description: Libraries for videoconferencing Owners: bpepple Branches: f17 InitialCC: (1) http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/farstream-devel/2012-February/02.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 797694] Review Request: Farstream - Libraries for videoconferencing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797694 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla 2012-03-02 13:28:56 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Gotcha, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 783837] Review Request: php-pecl-http - Extended HTTP support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783837 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 783837] Review Request: php-pecl-http - Extended HTTP support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783837 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2012-03-02 13:27:35 EST --- php-pecl-http-2.0.0-0.5.dev6.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pecl-http-2.0.0-0.5.dev6.fc17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 786676] Review Request: picketbox-xacml - PicketBox XACML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786676 --- Comment #5 from Ricardo Arguello 2012-03-02 13:39:08 EST --- Updated picketbox-xacml: Spec URL: http://ricardo.fedorapeople.org/package_review/picketbox-xacml/3/picketbox-xacml.spec SRPM URL: http://ricardo.fedorapeople.org/package_review/picketbox-xacml/3/picketbox-xacml-2.0.7-1.fc17.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 786587] Review Request: network-manager-applet - applet, editor, and private libs for NetworkManager GUI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786587 Matthias Clasen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mcla...@redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Matthias Clasen 2012-03-02 14:39:38 EST --- To get the package to build in mock, I had to change the gnome-keyring-devel BR to libgnome-keyring-devel, and add a BR for polkit-devel. I also had to add a patch for missing libraries in the gconf test utilities. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/*.rpm libnm-gtk.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US nm -> NM, mm, n libnm-gtk.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided NetworkManager-gtk libnm-gtk.x86_64: W: no-documentation libnm-gtk-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on libnm-gtk/libnm-gtk-libs/liblibnm-gtk libnm-gtk-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US config -> con fig, con-fig, configure libnm-gtk-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US nm -> NM, mm, n libnm-gtk-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation network-manager-applet.src: W: strange-permission network-manager-applet-0.9.2.0.tar.bz2 0444L network-manager-applet.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided NetworkManager-gnome network-manager-applet.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/network-manager-applet-0.9.2/AUTHORS network-manager-applet.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/nm-applet.schemas network-manager-applet.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/network-manager-applet-0.9.2/README network-manager-applet.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/autostart/nm-applet.desktop network-manager-applet.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary nm-applet nm-connection-editor.x86_64: W: no-documentation nm-connection-editor.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary nm-connection-editor 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 14 warnings. Looks all ignorable, except for the 0length files, which you should just drop from the file list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 786587] Review Request: network-manager-applet - applet, editor, and private libs for NetworkManager GUI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786587 --- Comment #6 from Matthias Clasen 2012-03-02 14:40:47 EST --- Created attachment 567150 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=567150 lib patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672205] Review Request: pynag - Python Nagios plugin and configuration environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672205 Matthias Runge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mru...@matthias-runge.de --- Comment #8 from Matthias Runge 2012-03-02 15:08:24 EST --- Hi Tomas, to get sponsored into the packager group, you must convince a sponsor to support you (or have somebody else to convince a sponsor) please read https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group and do some informal reviews. You should note the bugzilla numbers here (as a reference for your sponsor). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676879] Review Request: mpiexec - MPI job launcher that uses the PBS task interface directly
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676879 Matthias Runge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mru...@matthias-runge.de --- Comment #14 from Matthias Runge 2012-03-02 15:20:06 EST --- Christos, are you still interested? If yes, you should do some informal reviews and list the bugzilla-numbers here (as a reference for your potential sponsor). You need to do something to prove a sponsor your packaging-knowledge. Corresponding links are in comment 2 and still valid. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683638] Review Request: pyes- Python library for connecting to and managing Elasticsearch
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683638 Matthias Runge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mru...@matthias-runge.de --- Comment #5 from Matthias Runge 2012-03-02 15:39:26 EST --- Tavis, are you still interested? If yes, you should refer to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group especial the section https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group#Convincing_someone_to_sponsor_you You should do some informal reviews to convince a sponsor of your packaging qualities. You should note the bugzilla bug numbers here (as a reference for your sponsor) Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 786587] Review Request: network-manager-applet - applet, editor, and private libs for NetworkManager GUI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786587 Dan Williams changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(jamie@tomoyolinux ||.co.uk) --- Comment #7 from Dan Williams 2012-03-02 15:41:14 EST --- Updated specs and RPMs here, using latest upstream nm-applet: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dcbw/network-manager-applet.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dcbw/network-manager-applet-0.9.3.995-1.git20120302.fc17.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688183] Review Request: iceplayer - A simple music player for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688183 Matthias Runge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mru...@matthias-runge.de --- Comment #16 from Matthias Runge 2012-03-02 15:42:36 EST --- Mike, are you still interested? The spec file isn't accessible any more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 786587] Review Request: network-manager-applet - applet, editor, and private libs for NetworkManager GUI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786587 --- Comment #8 from Dan Williams 2012-03-02 15:41:34 EST --- (In reply to comment #7) > Updated specs and RPMs here, using latest upstream nm-applet: > > Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dcbw/network-manager-applet.spec > SRPM URL: > http://people.redhat.com/dcbw/network-manager-applet-0.9.3.995-1.git20120302.fc17.src.rpm This one passes a fedpkg mockbuild for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 667790] Review Request: python-audioprocessing - Python audio processing suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667790 Matthias Runge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mru...@matthias-runge.de Status Whiteboard|NotReady|Stalled Submitter --- Comment #6 from Matthias Runge 2012-03-02 15:47:12 EST --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 755291] Review Request: mod_pagespeed - Page Speed is an open-source project started at Google to help developers optimize their web pages by applying web performance best practices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755291 Matthias Runge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||mru...@matthias-runge.de Resolution||NOTABUG Last Closed||2012-03-02 15:50:21 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Runge 2012-03-02 15:50:21 EST --- Christopher, if you're going to submit mod_pagespeed as a new package for Fedora, please open a new Review Request. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675402] Review Request: qpass - password manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675402 Matthias Runge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||mru...@matthias-runge.de Resolution||WONTFIX Flag|needinfo?(mateuszpiekos@gma | |il.com) | Last Closed||2012-03-02 15:15:38 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 767985] Review Request: man2html - Convert man pages to HTML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767985 Matthias Runge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mru...@matthias-runge.de --- Comment #2 from Matthias Runge 2012-03-02 15:55:48 EST --- In order to get sponsored into the packager group, please follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group#Convincing_someone_to_sponsor_you You should do some informal reviews (and note the bug numbers e.g. here, as a reference for a potential sponsor). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 786587] Review Request: network-manager-applet - applet, editor, and private libs for NetworkManager GUI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786587 --- Comment #9 from Matthias Clasen 2012-03-02 15:59:05 EST --- Yes, builds fine now. rpmlint: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/*.rpm libnm-gtk.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US nm -> NM, mm, n libnm-gtk.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided NetworkManager-gtk libnm-gtk.x86_64: W: no-documentation libnm-gtk-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on libnm-gtk/libnm-gtk-libs/liblibnm-gtk libnm-gtk-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US config -> con fig, con-fig, configure libnm-gtk-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US nm -> NM, mm, n libnm-gtk-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation network-manager-applet.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/network-manager-applet/0.9/network-manager-applet-0.9.3.995.git20120302.tar.bz2 HTTP Error 404: Not Found network-manager-applet.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.9.3.995-1 ['0.9.3.995-1.git20120302.fc18', '0.9.3.995-1.git20120302'] network-manager-applet.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided NetworkManager-gnome network-manager-applet.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/nm-applet.schemas network-manager-applet.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/network-manager-applet-0.9.3.995/AUTHORS network-manager-applet.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/network-manager-applet-0.9.3.995/README network-manager-applet.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/autostart/nm-applet.desktop network-manager-applet.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary nm-applet nm-connection-editor.x86_64: W: no-documentation nm-connection-editor.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary nm-connection-editor 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 15 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 786587] Review Request: network-manager-applet - applet, editor, and private libs for NetworkManager GUI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786587 Matthias Clasen changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mcla...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676879] Review Request: mpiexec - MPI job launcher that uses the PBS task interface directly
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676879 --- Comment #15 from Christos Triantafyllidis 2012-03-02 16:04:27 EST --- Hi Matthias, i'm still interested although i'm not sure if latest version here is still working given the major changes in torque side (upgrade from 2.3 to 2.5). Given that my setup is still at 2.3 i don't see any urgent reason to put effort in updating this if there is no reviewer for it. If you are willing to review it and sponsor me i would happily do the needed (if any) changes and re-build it. I have done a few reviews or simply commented on other package requests in past: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682553 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683587 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772485 And i have submitted another package too: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772406 Let me know if you think that i have to do more reviews. Regards, Christos -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 799521] New: Review Request: azove - Another Zero-One Vertex Enumeration tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: azove - Another Zero-One Vertex Enumeration tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799521
Summary: Review Request: azove - Another Zero-One Vertex
Enumeration tool
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: loganje...@gmail.com
QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Spec URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/azove/azove.spec
SRPM URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/azove/azove-2.0-1.fc16.src.rpm
Description: Azove is a tool designed for counting (without explicit
enumeration) and enumeration of 0/1 vertices. Given a polytope by a linear
relaxation or facet description P = {x | Ax <= b}, all 0/1 points lying in P
can be counted or enumerated. This is done by intersecting the polytope P with
the unit-hypercube [0,1] d. The integral vertices (no fractional ones) of this
intersection will be enumerated. If P is a 0/1 polytope, azove solves the
vertex enumeration problem. In fact it can also solve the 0/1 knapsack problem
and the 0/1 subset sum problem.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673630] Review Request: habari - Lite blogging software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673630
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mru...@matthias-runge.de
--- Comment #6 from Matthias Runge 2012-03-02
15:14:23 EST ---
just two small comments:
ln -sf ../../../etc/habari/config.php
${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/habari/config.php
this will probably fail!
In order to get someone sponsor you into the packager group, you must convince
a potential sponsor of your packaging knowledge. You could prove this by doing
'informal reviews'.
Please refer to:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group
You should note the bugzilla numbers of your reviews here (as a reference for
your sponsor).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 786587] Review Request: network-manager-applet - applet, editor, and private libs for NetworkManager GUI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786587 --- Comment #10 from Matthias Clasen 2012-03-02 16:20:57 EST --- package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: generally ok; but it would be nice to use the standard gconf macros license: ok license field: ok language: ok readable: ok upstream sources: ok, but the url should be fixed buildable: ok excludearch: ok buildrequires: ok locale handling: ok ldconfig: ok system libs: ok relocatable: ok directory ownership: not ok; you must own /usr/share/nm-applet and /usr/include/libnm-gtk duplicate files: ok file permissions: ok macro use: ok content: ok large docs: ok %doc content: ok static libs: ok devel files: ok devel deps: not ok; libnm-gtk-devel should require libnm-gtk libtool archives: ok gui apps: not ok; currently only the autostart file is validated, the others should be too duplicate files: ok utf8 filenames: ok Summary: a few fixes required -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 797370] Review Request: python-ssh - A Python SSH2 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797370 Thomas Spura changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||toms...@fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|toms...@fedoraproject.org Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura 2012-03-02 16:28:36 EST --- Review: - name ok - license ok - URL ok - source ok 26800ef2c1ee3f185f48fd05258302f4 ssh-1.7.13.tar.gz - noarch ok - files ok - rpmlint contains the incorrect-fsf-addresses from above nothing else, ok NEEDSWORK: - please add a %check section: %check ./test.py --verbose - There is a python3-crypto package in fc17 onwards. Could you please add a python3 subpackage here too? Might be that ipython could use this too, and I'm trying to get all the python3 dependencies fulfilled... (When you need a co-maintainer, let me know.) It seems to work after 2to3 and replacing tabs with 8 spaces. - Please delete rm -rf ssh.egg-info/ in %prep just to be sure, that it's not used laterly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790564] Review Request: glassfish-fi - Fast Infoset
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790564 Andy Grimm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||agr...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|agr...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 786587] Review Request: network-manager-applet - applet, editor, and private libs for NetworkManager GUI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786587
--- Comment #11 from Dan Williams 2012-03-02 16:34:38 EST ---
git snapshots don't pass the URL check, I'm afraid...
libnm-gtk-devel already own /usr/include/libnm-gtk:
%files -n libnm-gtk-devel
%defattr(-,root,root,0755)
%dir %{_includedir}/libnm-gtk
I'll update it to own /usr/share/nm-applet too.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 786587] Review Request: network-manager-applet - applet, editor, and private libs for NetworkManager GUI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786587 --- Comment #12 from Dan Williams 2012-03-02 16:39:02 EST --- Updated specfile and srpm at same URLs as comment 7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 799558] New: Review Request: xfce4-soundmenu-plugin - MPRIS2 control plugin for the Xfce panel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-soundmenu-plugin - MPRIS2 control plugin for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799558 Summary: Review Request: xfce4-soundmenu-plugin - MPRIS2 control plugin for the Xfce panel Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cwick...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/xfce4-soundmenu-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/xfce4-soundmenu-plugin-0.4.0-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: A very basic xfce4-panel plugin to control MPRIS2 compatible media players. Features: * Play/Pause, Stop, Previous and Next track * Display album cover in the panel * Last.fm support Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3848311 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630221] Review Request: ghc-vty - A simple terminal access library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630221 Bug 630221 depends on bug 736586, which changed state. Bug 736586 Summary: Review Request: ghc-vector - Efficient Arrays for Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736586 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #5 from Ben Boeckel 2012-03-02 21:25:43 EST --- Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-vty/ghc-vty.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-vty/ghc-vty-4.7.0.10-1.fc18.src.rpm ghc-vty.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ncurses -> nurses, curses, n curses ghc-vty.src: W: strange-permission ghc-vty.spec 0640L ghc-vty.src: W: strange-permission vty-4.7.0.10.tar.gz 0640L ghc-vty.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ncurses -> nurses, curses, n curses ghc-vty-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ncurses -> nurses, curses, n curses 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630228] Review Request: ghc-io-storage - A key-value store in the IO monad
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630228 --- Comment #1 from Ben Boeckel 2012-03-02 21:30:36 EST --- Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-io-storage/ghc-io-storage.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-io-storage/ghc-io-storage-0.3-2.fc18.src.rpm ghc-io-storage.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) monad -> nomad, gonad, Mona ghc-io-storage.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US monad -> nomad, gonad, Mona ghc-io-storage.src: W: strange-permission io-storage-0.3.tar.gz 0640L ghc-io-storage.src: W: strange-permission ghc-io-storage.spec 0640L ghc-io-storage.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) monad -> nomad, gonad, Mona ghc-io-storage.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US monad -> nomad, gonad, Mona ghc-io-storage-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) monad -> nomad, gonad, Mona ghc-io-storage-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US monad -> nomad, gonad, Mona 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
