[Bug 690728] Review Request: Nitrate - A test case management system written in Django

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690728

--- Comment #60 from Yuguang Wang  2012-03-21 02:50:30 EDT 
---
All dependencies are reviewed.
This review is still under 3.3, while nitrate is on it's way to 4.0 after 3.4,
3.5 and 3.6 released. I'll discuss with my teammates and see where should we
start. Will reply next week, thanks.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 787020] Review Request: trafficserver - Apache Traffic Server

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787020

Julian C. Dunn  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jd...@aquezada.com

--- Comment #19 from Julian C. Dunn  2012-03-21 00:28:36 
EDT ---
Jan-Frode, I was testing this package on Fedora 16 and the init script seems to
hang, although the services are started properly and I can use trafficserver as
a forward proxy. I'm not that familiar with this software, so can you give me
some information about where I should start looking? This is what happens:


demeter:/etc/trafficserver$ sudo systemctl start trafficserver.service

Job failed. See system logs and 'systemctl status' for details.
demeter:/etc/trafficserver$ sudo systemctl status trafficserver.service
[sudo] password for jdunn: 
trafficserver.service - LSB: Startup/shutdown script for the Apache Traffic
Server
  Loaded: loaded (/etc/rc.d/init.d/trafficserver)
  Active: failed since Wed, 21 Mar 2012 00:25:44 -0400; 17s ago
 Process: 1663 ExecStart=/etc/rc.d/init.d/trafficserver start
(code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
  CGroup: name=systemd:/system/trafficserver.service
  ├ 1453 /usr/bin/traffic_cop
  ├ 1455 /usr/bin/traffic_manager
  └ 1467 /usr/bin/traffic_server -M -A,9:X

and some relevant log file lines from /var/log/messages:

Mar 21 00:20:44 demeter trafficserver[1663]: Starting Apache Traffic Server: [ 
OK  ]#015[  OK  ]
Mar 21 00:20:44 demeter systemd[1]: PID file /var/run/trafficserver/cop.pid not
readable (yet?) after start.
Mar 21 00:25:44 demeter systemd[1]: trafficserver.service operation timed out.
Terminating.
Mar 21 00:25:44 demeter systemd[1]: Unit trafficserver.service entered failed
state.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 799649] Review Request: python-django-tables2 - Table framework for Django

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799649

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|python-django-tables2-0.9.4 |python-django-tables2-0.9.4
   |-2.fc17 |-2.fc16

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  2012-03-20 
22:38:17 EDT ---
python-django-tables2-0.9.4-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 752223] Review Request: racoon2 - an implementation of key management system for IPsec

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=752223

--- Comment #53 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-20 22:40:33 EDT ---
racoon2-20100526a-17.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. 
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 804659] Review Request: cdi-api - APIs for JSR-299: Contexts and Dependency Injection for Java EE

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804659

--- Comment #2 from Asaf Shakarchi  2012-03-20 21:26:02 EDT ---
jboss-interceptors-1.1-api was defined correctly in the Spec file but not the
one within the srpm, I updated the srpm as well,


Thanks.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 577951] Review Request: mingw-wine-gecko - MinGW Gecko library required for Wine

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951

Michael Cronenworth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 577951] Review Request: mingw-wine-gecko - MinGW Gecko library required for Wine

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951

Michael Cronenworth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||m...@cchtml.com
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@cchtml.com
   Flag||fedora-review+

--- Comment #28 from Michael Cronenworth  2012-03-20 19:37:22 
EDT ---
Hi Andreas, lets get wine-gecko in Fedora!

$ md5sum rpmbuild/SOURCES/wine-mozilla-1.5-src.tar.bz2
e1d9ba8914582d382b808332e4db0a54  wine-mozilla-1.5-src.tar.bz2
# wget $SOURCE0
$ md5sum $SOURCE0
e1d9ba8914582d382b808332e4db0a54  wine-mozilla-1.5-src.tar.bz2

Your spec looks great. Let's check rpmlint.

$ rpmlint mingw32-wine-gecko
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

$ rpmlint mingw64-wine-gecko
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Looks great there, too. Everything looks in order to me.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 730815] Review Request: pamtester - Utility to test Pluggable Authentication Modules (PAM)

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730815

Robert Scheck  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #7 from Robert Scheck  2012-03-20 18:50:54 EDT 
---
Michael, thank you very much for the review and for pinging me :)


New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: pamtester
Short Description: Utility to test Pluggable Authentication Modules (PAM)
Owners: robert
Branches: el5 el6 f15 f16 f17
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 805332] New: Review Request: pyp - Python-centric command line text manipulation tool similar to awk and sed

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: pyp - Python-centric command line text manipulation 
tool similar to awk and sed

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805332

   Summary: Review Request: pyp - Python-centric command line text
manipulation tool similar to awk and sed
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: mmcki...@nexcess.net
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
  Story Points: ---
  Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
 Documentation: ---


Spec URL: http://mmckinst.fedorapeople.org/packages/pyp/pyp.spec
SRPM URL: http://mmckinst.fedorapeople.org/packages/pyp/pyp-2.11-1.fc16.src.rpm
Description:
Pyp is a Linux command line text manipulation tool similar to awk or
sed, but which uses standard python string and list methods as well as
custom functions evolved to generate fast results in an intense
production environment.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 577951] Review Request: mingw-wine-gecko - MinGW Gecko library required for Wine

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951

--- Comment #27 from Andreas Bierfert  
2012-03-20 17:46:16 EDT ---
updated srpm/spec:
http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/mingw-wine-gecko.spec
http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/mingw-wine-gecko-1.5-1.fc17.src.rpm

koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3914963

changes:
- upgrade to latest wine gecko (1.5)
- cleanup spec including changes from comment 25

I have prepared an upgrade to wine 1.5.0 for f17 and rawhide. If wine-gecko
gets a fast review I will hold wine 1.5.0 and release both at the same time.
This would ensure that wine automatically pulls in the fedora mingw gecko on
upgrading the prefix to 1.5.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 805327] New: Review Request: pyrasite-gui - A graphical interface for monitoring and introspecting Python

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: pyrasite-gui - A graphical interface for monitoring 
and introspecting Python

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805327

   Summary: Review Request: pyrasite-gui - A graphical interface
for monitoring and introspecting Python
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lmac...@redhat.com
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
  Story Points: ---
  Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
 Documentation: ---


Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/pyrasite-gui.spec
SRPM URL:
http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/pyrasite-gui-2.0-0.1.beta7.fc16.src.rpm
Description:
Pyrasite uses gdb to inject code into a running Python process. This package
contains a graphical interface for Pyrasite, which allows you to easily analyze
and introspect a running Python process.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 805327] Review Request: pyrasite-gui - A graphical interface for monitoring and introspecting Python

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805327

Luke Macken  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||803149

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 803149] Review Request: pyrasite - Code injection and monitoring of running Python processes

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803149

Luke Macken  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||805327

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 690728] Review Request: Nitrate - A test case management system written in Django

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690728

Michael Scherer  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||m...@zarb.org

--- Comment #59 from Michael Scherer  2012-03-20 17:31:22 EDT ---
Since 728837 is closed, xml2dict is in , can this review start again ?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 226194] Merge Review: NetworkManager

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226194

Pavel Simerda  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 CC||pav...@pavlix.net
 Resolution||NOTABUG
Last Closed||2012-03-20 16:56:01

--- Comment #1 from Pavel Simerda  2012-03-20 16:56:01 EDT 
---
This bug report is very old and links to a broken URL. It's void.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802761] Review Request: drupal6-geshifilter - geshifilter module for drupal6

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802761

Anderson Silva  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|rdie...@math.unl.edu|ble...@redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802758] Review Request: drupal6-drush - cli for drupal management

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802758

Anderson Silva  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|rdie...@math.unl.edu|ble...@redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 730815] Review Request: pamtester - Utility to test Pluggable Authentication Modules (PAM)

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730815

--- Comment #6 from Michael Scherer  2012-03-20 16:34:11 EDT ---
Robert, you need to do the request for the git : 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 798616] Review Request: jboss-ejb3-ext-api - JBoss EJB 3 Extension API

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798616

--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-20 16:32:34 EDT ---
jboss-ejb3-ext-api-2.0.0-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jboss-ejb3-ext-api-2.0.0-2.fc17

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 798616] Review Request: jboss-ejb3-ext-api - JBoss EJB 3 Extension API

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798616

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 787713] Review request: FreeSOLID - A 3D collision detection C++ library

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787713

MartinKG  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Review request: free-solid  |Review request: FreeSOLID -
   |- A 3D collision detection  |A 3D collision detection
   |C++ library |C++ library

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 758472] Review Request: Equalizer

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758472

Alec Leamas  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||leamas.a...@gmail.com

--- Comment #15 from Alec Leamas  2012-03-20 16:20:54 
EDT ---
Some random thoughts, really unsorted:

- The naming issue need to be resolved. Possible routes seems to include a
'lib' prefix and/or (perhaps) a 'gl' prefix/suffix. 
- Although provisions are made to use system libs, the bundled libs are not
removed in %prep as required in
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Treatment_Of_Bundled_Libraries.
- Several packages have multiple licenses without a breakdown showing which
license applies to what
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios)
- tclap's COPYING is not packaged as %doc.
- Collage has no license, and does not require base package.
- In my eyes, the documentation in devel might motivate a separate -doc
package(?)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 805304] New: Review Request: faf - Bug analysis framework for Fedora

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: faf - Bug analysis framework for Fedora

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805304

   Summary: Review Request: faf - Bug analysis framework for
Fedora
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: kk...@redhat.com
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
  Story Points: ---
  Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
 Documentation: ---


Spec URL: http://kklic.fedorapeople.org/faf.spec
SRPM URL: http://kklic.fedorapeople.org/faf-0.4-1.fc16.src.rpm
Description:
Faf is a programmable platform for analysis of packages, packaging
issues, bug reports and other artifacts produced within Fedora
operating system development.

$ rpmlint faf-0.4-1.fc16.src.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

$ rpmlint faf-client-0.4-1.fc16.noarch.rpm 
faf-client.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Kobo -> Kobe, Hobo
faf-client.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Kobo -> Kobe, Hobo
faf-client.noarch: W: no-documentation
faf-client.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary faf-client
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.

$ rpmlint faf-hub-0.4-1.fc16.noarch.rpm 
faf-hub.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Kobo -> Kobe, Hobo
faf-hub.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Kobo -> Kobe, Hobo
faf-hub.noarch: W: no-documentation
faf-hub.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/spool/faf/hub faf
faf-hub.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/faf/hub 0770L
faf-hub.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/spool/faf/hub/upload faf
faf-hub.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/faf/hub/upload 0770L
faf-hub.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/spool/faf/hub/tasks faf
faf-hub.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/faf/hub/tasks 0770L
faf-hub.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary faf-hub
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 7 warnings.

$ rpmlint faf-worker-0.4-1.fc16.noarch.rpm 
faf-worker.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Kobo -> Kobe, Hobo
faf-worker.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Kobo -> Kobe, Hobo
faf-worker.noarch: W: no-documentation
faf-worker.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/spool/faf/worker faf
faf-worker.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/faf/worker 0770L
faf-worker.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary faf-worker
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings.

$ rpmlint faf-0.4-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm 
faf.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/faf faf
faf.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/faf faf
faf.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/faf 0775L
faf.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/faf/wrappers/gcc 0644L
/usr/bin/python
faf.x86_64: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pyfaf/libsolv.py 0644L /usr/bin/python
faf.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /usr/bin/faf-chroot-helper faf
faf.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/faf-chroot-helper root 04750L
faf.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/faf-chroot-helper 04750L
faf.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/faf-chroot-helper 04750L
faf.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pyfaf/config.py
faf.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/faf/build faf
faf.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/faf/build faf
faf.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/faf/build 0775L
faf.x86_64: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pyfaf/koji.py 0644L /usr/bin/python
faf.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/faf/wrappers/g++ 0644L
/usr/bin/python
faf.x86_64: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pyfaf/cache/koji_build_funfin_report.py 0644L
/usr/bin/python
faf.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/faf/wrappers/ld 0644L
/usr/bin/python
faf.x86_64: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pyfaf/argparse.py 0644L /usr/bin/python
faf.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/faf-config
faf.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/spool/faf faf
faf.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/spool/faf faf
faf.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/faf 0775L
faf.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/faf faf
faf.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/faf 02775L
faf.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/faf
faf.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary faf-stats-abrt-bugs-opened
faf.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary faf-funfin-analyze-binary
faf.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary faf-bugzilla-pull-attachments
faf.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary faf-stats-abrt-crashes
faf.x86_64

[Bug 693820] Review Request: gallery3 - Customizable photo gallery web site

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693820

--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla  2012-03-20 15:44:33 EDT 
---
I'm not sure.  When I get a chance, I'll try a test install incorporating your
fixes.  I sort or ran out of steam on this when I discontinued my personal
gallery2 install, which I'd hoped to migrate to gallery3.  If I can get this
all squared away, I'll push an updated build.  Thanks for working on this.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 787713] Review request: free-solid - A 3D collision detection C++ library

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787713

--- Comment #16 from MartinKG  2012-03-20 15:20:17 EDT ---
NEW spec + srpm, package renamed to FreeSolid

https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/FreeSOLID/FreeSOLID.spec?a=MHazzHUz_4M
https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/FreeSOLID/FreeSOLID-2.1.1-5.fc16.src.rpm?a=vwx_aob1fTE

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 771252] Review Request: cinnamon - Window management and application launching for GNOME

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252

Need Real Name  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||redhat_bugzilla@deadlychees
   ||e.endjunk.com

--- Comment #38 from Need Real Name  
2012-03-20 14:26:42 EDT ---
As a developer, I appreciate the commentary, and the professionalism and
diligence that is driving it, so thanks all of you for that.

As a longtime Fedora user ... I'll be pleased to have Cinnamon in Fedora. I
have suspended Fedora upgrades on all my desktop systems until a reasonable
alternative to Gnome 3 shell is offered.  I think Cinnamon will allow me to
continue to use (and advocate) Fedora.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 746215] Review Request: perl-RT-Authen-ExternalAuth - RT Authentication using External Sources

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746215

--- Comment #7 from Gabriel Somlo  2012-03-20 14:16:42 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Hi Gabriel,
> sorry for late response. I will post SCM admin request today, and put you 
> there
> as co-maintainer. Also update package to current 0.10 release. Would that be
> OK? :)

Excellent -- Thanks !

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 804824] Review Request: JavaServer(TM) Pages 2.2 API

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804824

--- Comment #4 from Anthony Sasadeusz  2012-03-20 14:17:14 
EDT ---
Spec URL:

SRPM URL:


http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3914533

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 627362] Review Request: sx - extract and analyzes sos reports

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627362

Shane Bradley  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NOTABUG
Last Closed||2012-03-20 14:14:48

--- Comment #18 from Shane Bradley  2012-03-20 14:14:48 
EDT ---
closing bz.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 804824] Review Request: JavaServer(TM) Pages 2.2 API

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804824

Anthony Sasadeusz  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
   |jboss-jsp-2.2-api - The JSP |JavaServer(TM) Pages 2.2
   |API used for the JBOSS  |API
   |project |

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 788569] Review Request: libgda5 - Library for writing gnome database programs

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788569

--- Comment #2 from Tomáš Bžatek  2012-03-20 14:11:01 EDT 
---
> BuildRequires:unique-devel >= 1.1.6
Shouldn't this be unique3 rather? Also, configure.ac references no libunique,
is that really necessary?

> BuildRequires:gnome-keyring-devel
> BuildRequires:libgnome-keyring-devel
Duplicate BR, only use libgnome-keyring-devel

> BuildRequires:libtool automake autoconf
Not needed probably, I don't see any traces of automake files modifications

Explicit require of libgcrypt-devel would be nice, it's referenced from
configure as well.

> BuildRequires:gtk-doc scrollkeeper intltool gettext flex bison 
> perl(XML::Parser)
Are flex and bison really necessary?


Note: some header files in the -devel package reference header files which
should ideally belong to plugins. Let's keep them all in the common -devel
package.

Note: builds fine in koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3914490

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 694994] Review Request: yoshimi - Rewrite of ZynAddSubFx aiming for better JACK support

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694994

Brendan Jones  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||805236(FedoraAudio)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 571993] Review Request: non-sequencer - A powerful, real-time, pattern-based MIDI sequencer

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571993

--- Comment #18 from Brendan Jones  2012-03-20 
13:49:27 EDT ---
Looks like upstream has pushed out a new release.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 571993] Review Request: non-sequencer - A powerful, real-time, pattern-based MIDI sequencer

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571993

Brendan Jones  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||brendan.jones...@gmail.com
 Blocks||805236(FedoraAudio)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 804826] Review Request: ipxe - A network boot loader

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804826

--- Comment #2 from Daniel Berrange  2012-03-20 13:43:58 
EDT ---
New SRPM with all those issues addressed, SPEC at same URL as before:

http://berrange.fedorapeople.org/review/ipxe/ipxe-20120319-2.git0b2c788.fc18.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 724936] Review Request: python-mock - A Python Mocking and Patching Library for Testing

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724936

--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-20 13:44:43 EDT ---
python-mock-0.7.2-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-mock-0.7.2-1.el6

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 783825] Review Request: suil - A lightweight C library for loading and wrapping LV2 plugin UIs

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783825

Brendan Jones  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||805236(FedoraAudio)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 789055] Review Request: japa - JACK and ALSA Perceptual Analyser

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789055

Brendan Jones  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||805236(FedoraAudio)

Bug 789055 depends on bug 788718, which changed state.

Bug 788718 Summary: Review Request: clalsadrv - An ALSA driver C++ library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788718

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
 Resolution||ERRATA
 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 789059] Review Request: jaaa - JACK and ALSA Audio Analyzer

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789059

Brendan Jones  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||805236(FedoraAudio)

Bug 789059 depends on bug 788718, which changed state.

Bug 788718 Summary: Review Request: clalsadrv - An ALSA driver C++ library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788718

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
 Resolution||ERRATA
 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 805013] Review Request: ecasound - Music application for multitrack audio editing

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805013

Brendan Jones  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||brendan.jones...@gmail.com
 Blocks||805236(FedoraAudio)
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|brendan.jones...@gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from Brendan Jones  2012-03-20 
13:29:50 EDT ---
I will review this package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 789385] Review Request: ambdec - an ambiosonics decoder

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789385

Brendan Jones  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||805236(FedoraAudio)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 784605] Review Request: lv2-instance-access: An LV2 audio plug-in extension which enables plugin UIs access to an LV2 plugin

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784605

Brendan Jones  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||805236(FedoraAudio)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 789055] Review Request: japa - JACK and ALSA Perceptual Analyser

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789055

Brendan Jones  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||805236(FedoraAudio)
 Depends on|805236(FedoraAudio) |

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 788717] Review Request: lv2-ir - An LV2 impulse response reverb plugin

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788717

Brendan Jones  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||805236(FedoraAudio)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 789390] Review Request: aeolus - a synthesized organ for ALSA/JACK

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789390

Brendan Jones  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||805236(FedoraAudio)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 789240] Review Request: freqtweak - Realtime audio frequency spectral manipulation

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789240

Brendan Jones  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||805236(FedoraAudio)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 797418] Review Request: qtractor - Audio/MIDI multi-track sequencer

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797418

Brendan Jones  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||805236(FedoraAudio)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 789255] Review Request: ebumeter - Loudness measurement according to EBU-R128

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789255

Brendan Jones  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||805236(FedoraAudio)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 788569] Review Request: libgda5 - Library for writing gnome database programs

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788569

Tomáš Bžatek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||tbza...@redhat.com

--- Comment #1 from Tomáš Bžatek  2012-03-20 13:13:29 EDT 
---
$ rpmlint libgda5-5.0.3-1.fc18.src.rpm 
> 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

$ rpmlint x86_64/*.rpm
> libgda5-bdb.x86_64: W: no-documentation
> libgda5-bdb-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ndb -> db, 
> nib, nab
> libgda5-bdb-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
> libgda5-java.x86_64: W: no-documentation
> libgda5-java-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
> libgda5-ldap.x86_64: W: no-documentation
> libgda5-ldap-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
> libgda5-mdb.x86_64: W: no-documentation
> libgda5-mdb-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
> libgda5-mysql.x86_64: W: no-documentation
> libgda5-mysql-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
> libgda5-postgres.x86_64: W: no-documentation
> libgda5-postgres-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
> libgda5-sqlcipher.x86_64: W: no-documentation
> libgda5-sqlcipher-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
> libgda5-sqlite.x86_64: W: no-documentation
> libgda5-sqlite-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
> libgda5-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gda-list-server-op
> libgda5-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gda-list-config-5.0
> libgda5-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gda-sql
> libgda5-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gda-test-connection-5.0
> libgda5-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gda-sql-5.0
> libgda5-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gda-list-config
> libgda5-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gda-list-jdbc-providers-5.0
> libgda5-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gda-control-center-5.0
> libgda5-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gda-list-server-op-5.0
> libgda5-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gda-browser-5.0
> libgda5-ui.x86_64: W: no-documentation
> libgda5-ui-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
> libgda5-ui-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gdaui-demo-5.0
> libgda5-web.x86_64: W: no-documentation
> libgda5-web-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
> 24 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 32 warnings.

The no-documentation warning could be easily ignored, manpages would be nice to
have but it's not a blocker.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 788569] Review Request: libgda5 - Library for writing gnome database programs

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788569

Tomáš Bžatek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|tbza...@redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 800756] Review Request: infinispan - Data grid platform

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800756

Juan Hernández  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||juan.hernan...@redhat.com
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|juan.hernan...@redhat.com
   Flag||fedora-review?

--- Comment #1 from Juan Hernández  2012-03-20 
13:07:32 EDT ---
Package Review
==

Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated

=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x]  Rpmlint output:

Output of rpmlint of the source package:

$ rpmlint infinispan-5.1.1-2.fc17.src.rpm
infinispan.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable -> salable,
callable, calculable
infinispan.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch, mufti
infinispan.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US util -> til, until, u
til
infinispan.src: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.jboss.org/infinispan HTTP Error
403: Forbidden
infinispan.src: W: invalid-url Source0: infinispan-5.1.1.FINAL.tar.xz
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.

Output of rpmlint of the binary packages:

$ rpmlint infinispan-5.1.1-2.fc18.src.rpm
infinispan-javadoc-5.1.1-2.fc18.noarch.rpm
infinispan.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable -> salable,
callable, calculable
infinispan.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch, mufti
infinispan.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US util -> til, until, u
til
infinispan.src: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.jboss.org/infinispan HTTP Error
403: Forbidden
infinispan.src: W: invalid-url Source0: infinispan-5.1.1.FINAL.tar.xz
infinispan-javadoc.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Javadocs -> Java
docs, Java-docs, Avocados
infinispan-javadoc.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.jboss.org/infinispan
HTTP Error 403: Forbidden
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings.

These warnigs are acceptable.

[x]  Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1].
[x]  Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[!]  Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].

The names of the jar files used by the build are "infinispan-*.jar" but the
package remove the "infinispan" prefix. This is against the packaging
guidelines.

[x]  Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.

See  http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3913874

[x]  Buildroot definition is not present
[x]  Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines[3,4].
[x]  License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: LGPLv2.1+
[!]  If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[!]  All independent sub-packages have license of their own

I think that the file license/src/main/resources/META-INF/LICENSE.txt.vm should
be added to the documentation of the main and javadoc packages (renamed to
LICENSE.txt).

[x]  Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]  Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.

Checked with a recursive diff of the source files.

[x]  All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5].
[x]  Package must own all directories that it creates or must require other
packages for directories it uses.
[x]  Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]  File sections do not contain %defattr(-,root,root,-) unless changed with
good reason
[x]  Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]  Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore)
[x]  Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
mixing)
[x]  Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-]  Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-]  Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x]  Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]  Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[x]  Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks)
[x]  Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[x]  Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
[x]  Package uses %global not %define
[x]  If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that
tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...)
[x]  If source tarb

[Bug 804826] Review Request: ipxe - A network boot loader

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804826

Michael Scherer  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||m...@zarb.org

--- Comment #1 from Michael Scherer  2012-03-20 12:39:09 EDT ---
A few comments before starting the review  :
- use %global rather than %define 
( see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define
)

- BuildRoot is no longer needed and should be removed

- same for rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT at the beggining of %install, and for %clean

- %defattr(-,root,root,-) is uneeded too

- Patch1 should have a mention of being sent upstream

- BuildRequires would be IMHO, better on a 4 lines, better for reviewing diff (
but that's just a personal note, not blocking for review )

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 627362] Review Request: sx - extract and analyzes sos reports

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627362

--- Comment #17 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)  
2012-03-20 12:30:09 EDT ---
Ok, then please just close it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802909] Review Request: jboss-interceptor - JBoss EJB Interceptor Library

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802909

Juan Hernández  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||juan.hernan...@redhat.com
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|juan.hernan...@redhat.com
   Flag||fedora-review?

--- Comment #1 from Juan Hernández  2012-03-20 
12:18:27 EDT ---
Package Review
==

Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated

=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[?]  Rpmlint output:

Output of rpmlint of the source package:

$ rpmlint jboss-interceptor-2.0.0-1.fc17.src.rpm
jboss-interceptor.src: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.jboss.org HTTP Error 403:
Forbidden
jboss-interceptor.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
jboss-interceptor-2.0.0.Final.tar.xz
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

These warnings are acceptable.

The binary packages can't be evaluated because the build fails. See
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3913828

[x]  Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1].
[x]  Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]  Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[!]  Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.

The build fails. See
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3913828. Looks like it is
missing "BuildRequires: maven-surefire-provider-junit4".

[x]  Buildroot definition is not present
[x]  Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines[3,4].

[!]  License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.

The license of the package is ASL 2.0 but the following files have a header
stating that it is LGPLv2.1+:

jboss-interceptor-core/src/test/java/org/jboss/interceptors/metadata/GrandParentInterceptor.java
jboss-interceptor-core/src/test/java/org/jboss/interceptors/metadata/ParentInterceptor.java
jboss-interceptor-core/src/test/java/org/jboss/interceptors/metadata/ChildInterceptor.java

If this was intended by the upstream developers then the license tag should be
"ASL 2.0 and LGPLv2.1+". This needs to be cleared with upstream and maybe
legal.

[-]  If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x]  All independent sub-packages have license of their own
[x]  Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]  Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.

Checked using a recursive diff of the source files.

[x]  All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5].
[x]  Package must own all directories that it creates or must require other
packages for directories it uses.
[x]  Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]  File sections do not contain %defattr(-,root,root,-) unless changed with
good reason
[x]  Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]  Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore)
[x]  Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
mixing)
[x]  Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-]  Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-]  Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x]  Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]  Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[x]  Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks)
[x]  Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[x]  Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
[x]  Package uses %global not %define
[x]  If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that
tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...)
[-]  If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be
removed prior to building
[x]  All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[x]  Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (see [6] for details)
[x]  If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when
building with ant
[x]  pom files has correct add_maven_depmap

=== Maven ===
[x]  Use %{_mavenpomdir} macro for placing pom files instead of
%{_datadir}/maven2/poms
[-]  If package uses "-Dmaven.test.skip=true" explain why it was needed in a
comment
[-]  If package uses custom depmap "-Dmaven.local.depmap.file=*" explain why
it's needed in a com

[Bug 605674] Review Request: perl-IO-InSitu - Avoid clobbering files opened for both input and output

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605674

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-review?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 605674] Review Request: perl-IO-InSitu - Avoid clobbering files opened for both input and output

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605674

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-review?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 605674] Review Request: perl-IO-InSitu - Avoid clobbering files opened for both input and output

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605674

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Version|rawhide |1.4
  Component|Package Review  |unknown
 CC||asalk...@redhat.com,
   ||jfrie...@redhat.com,
   ||sd...@redhat.com
Product|Fedora  |Corosync Cluster Engine
   Flag|fedora-review?  |
 OS/Version|Linux   |Unspecified

--- Comment #8 from Paul Howarth  2012-03-20 11:43:22 EDT ---
OK, time to take another look at this.

With rpm 4.9, the automatic dependency finder detects the "use base" construct
and so you no longer need the explicit perl(IO::File) dependency for current
Fedora versions. For all EPEL releases, which all have older versions of rpm,
the IO::File module is bundled with the main perl package so it's not really
needed there either. So I'd now suggest getting rid of that requirement.

Looking at build requirements, the module uses the following dual-lived modules
that are not explicitly build-required:

* perl(base)
* perl(Carp)
* perl(File::Temp)
* perl(IO::File)

I'd add build-requires for those given that they may be dual-lived in Fedora
either now or in the future.

It's not actually necessary to remove empty directories from the buildroot as
rpm-build will not include them in the package unless they're included in the
%files list, and it won't complain about them either.

rpm 4.9 now has a native method for filtering unwanted requires and provides.
The method used in this spec file will work for current Fedora releases and
EPEL 6 but not EPEL 5. If you want filters that work everywhere, you'll
currently need to use two sets of filters - for example as I've done in the
perl-SUPER package:

http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=perl-SUPER.git;a=blob;f=perl-SUPER.spec

That's using rpm 4.9's native filtering and the old %__perl_provides macro as a
fallback for older rpm versions.

Using macros for commands (e.g. %{__perl}, %{__id_u} -n) is now discouraged:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Macros

I'd just use "perl" and "id -nu" in these cases now.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 605674] Review Request: perl-IO-InSitu - Avoid clobbering files opened for both input and output

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605674

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC|asalk...@redhat.com,|
   |jfrie...@redhat.com,|
   |sd...@redhat.com|
 Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)  |

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 605674] Review Request: perl-IO-InSitu - Avoid clobbering files opened for both input and output

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605674

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||package-review@lists.fedora
   ||project.org
  Component|unknown |Package Review
Version|1.4 |rawhide
 AssignedTo|p...@city-fan.org   |nob...@fedoraproject.org
Product|Corosync Cluster Engine |Fedora

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 605674] Review Request: perl-IO-InSitu - Avoid clobbering files opened for both input and output

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605674

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||package-review@lists.fedora
   ||project.org
  Component|unknown |Package Review
Version|1.4 |rawhide
 AssignedTo|p...@city-fan.org   |nob...@fedoraproject.org
Product|Corosync Cluster Engine |Fedora

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 605674] Review Request: perl-IO-InSitu - Avoid clobbering files opened for both input and output

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605674

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC|asalk...@redhat.com,|
   |jfrie...@redhat.com,|
   |sd...@redhat.com|
 Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)  |

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 605674] Review Request: perl-IO-InSitu - Avoid clobbering files opened for both input and output

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605674

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|p...@city-fan.org

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 605674] Review Request: perl-IO-InSitu - Avoid clobbering files opened for both input and output

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605674

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|p...@city-fan.org

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 799810] Review Request: python-picloud - PiCloud client-side Library

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799810

Christoph Wickert  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||cwick...@fedoraproject.org
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cwick...@fedoraproject.org
   Flag||fedora-review?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 800720] Review Request: resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720

--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla  2012-03-20 10:52:12 EDT 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 800720] Review Request: resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720

--- Comment #12 from Ade Lee  2012-03-20 10:47:14 EDT ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: resteasy
Short Description: Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications
Owners: vakwetu
Branches: f17
InitialCC: goldmann jhernand

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 800720] Review Request: resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720

Ade Lee  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 794988] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Blowfish_PP - Blowfish encryption algorithm implemented purely in Perl

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794988

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-20 10:42:46 EDT ---
perl-Crypt-Blowfish_PP-1.12-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Crypt-Blowfish_PP-1.12-2.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 794988] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Blowfish_PP - Blowfish encryption algorithm implemented purely in Perl

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794988

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-20 10:41:37 EDT ---
perl-Crypt-Blowfish_PP-1.12-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Crypt-Blowfish_PP-1.12-2.fc16

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 794985] Review Request: perl-Data-AMF - Serialize/deserialize Adobe's AMF (ActionMessageFormat) data

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794985

--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-20 10:37:31 EDT ---
perl-Data-AMF-0.09-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Data-AMF-0.09-2.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 795566] Review Request: woden - Web Service Description Language (WSDL) validating parser

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795566

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  2012-03-20 
10:40:02 EDT ---
woden-1.0-0.1.M9.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/woden-1.0-0.1.M9.fc17

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 800720] Review Request: resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720

--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla  2012-03-20 10:37:55 EDT 
---
Please include a valid SCM request:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests

Thanks!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 795566] Review Request: woden - Web Service Description Language (WSDL) validating parser

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795566

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 794988] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Blowfish_PP - Blowfish encryption algorithm implemented purely in Perl

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794988

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-20 10:40:41 EDT ---
perl-Crypt-Blowfish_PP-1.12-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Crypt-Blowfish_PP-1.12-2.fc17

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 800720] Review Request: resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720

Ade Lee  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 794985] Review Request: perl-Data-AMF - Serialize/deserialize Adobe's AMF (ActionMessageFormat) data

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794985

--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-20 10:36:16 EDT ---
perl-Data-AMF-0.09-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Data-AMF-0.09-2.fc16

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 805037] Review Request: commons-compiler - Interfaces for an embedded Java compiler

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805037

Mary Ellen Foster  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|805035  |
 Depends on||805035

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 805035] Review Request: janino-parent - Parent POM for Janino

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805035

Mary Ellen Foster  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||805037
 Depends on|805037  |

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 805047] Review Request: janino - An embedded Java compiler

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805047

--- Comment #1 from Mary Ellen Foster  2012-03-20 10:17:11 
EDT ---
Created attachment 571421
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=571421
build.log from local mock build

This package got retired from Fedora when I didn't have time to maintain it.
I'd like to get it re-added.

Here is a local mock build log (with commons-compiler and janino-parent added
to the buildroot).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 805047] Review Request: janino - An embedded Java compiler

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805047

Mary Ellen Foster  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||805035, 805037
 Blocks||652183(FE-JAVASIG)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 805037] Review Request: commons-compiler - Interfaces for an embedded Java compiler

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805037

Mary Ellen Foster  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||805047

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 805035] Review Request: janino-parent - Parent POM for Janino

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805035

Mary Ellen Foster  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||805047

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 805047] New: Review Request: janino - An embedded Java compiler

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: janino - An embedded Java compiler

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805047

   Summary: Review Request: janino - An embedded Java compiler
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
  Severity: unspecified
  Priority: unspecified
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: mefos...@gmail.com
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
  Story Points: ---
  Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
 Documentation: ---



Spec URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org//janino.spec
SRPM URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org//janino-2.6.1-1.fc16.src.rpm

Description:
Janino is a super-small, super-fast Java compiler. Not only can it compile
a set of source files to a set of class files like the JAVAC tool, but also
can it compile a Java expression, block, class body or source file in
memory, load the bytecode and execute it directly in the same JVM. Janino
is not intended to be a development tool, but an embedded compiler for
run-time compilation purposes, e.g. expression evaluators or "server pages"
engines like JSP.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 805037] Review Request: commons-compiler - Interfaces for an embedded Java compiler

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805037

Mary Ellen Foster  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
   |commons-compiler - Summary  |commons-compiler -
   |of the package  |Interfaces for an embedded
   ||Java compiler

--- Comment #1 from Mary Ellen Foster  2012-03-20 10:07:16 
EDT ---
Fixed Summary :)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 784359] Review Request: qpid-gui-tools - GUI utilities for Red Hat MRG qpid

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784359

--- Comment #20 from Haïkel Guémar  2012-03-20 10:11:09 
EDT ---
@nuno: in the first place, it was not stalled since only sponsors can approve
package reviews with FE-NEEDSPONSOR flag set. 

Extracted from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_sponsor_a_new_contributor
"Once they've made those changes, you can approve the package and sponsor the
user in the fedora account system"

A sponsor can't sponsor someone without having formally reviewed at least one
package from the new packager (unless you take the co-maintainership path)
No matter how thorough you review has been, until Eallen has been sponsored,
you can't approve this package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 804659] Review Request: cdi-api - APIs for JSR-299: Contexts and Dependency Injection for Java EE

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804659

Juan Hernández  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||juan.hernan...@redhat.com
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|juan.hernan...@redhat.com
   Flag||fedora-review?

--- Comment #1 from Juan Hernández  2012-03-20 
10:08:07 EDT ---
I am taking this for review.

The requirements for the interceptors API has to be changed, as the name of
that package is "jboss-interceptors-1.1-api", not "jboss-interceptors-api_1.1".

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 805037] Review Request: commons-compiler - Interfaces for an embedded Java compiler

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805037

--- Comment #2 from Mary Ellen Foster  2012-03-20 10:11:25 
EDT ---
Created attachment 571417
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=571417
build.log from local mock build

Here's the output of a local mock build (including janino-parent in the
buildroot)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 795566] Review Request: woden - Web Service Description Language (WSDL) validating parser

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795566

Andy Grimm  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|652183(FE-JAVASIG)  |

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 805037] New: Review Request: commons-compiler - Summary of the package

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: commons-compiler - Summary of the package

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805037

   Summary: Review Request: commons-compiler - Summary of the
package
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
  Severity: unspecified
  Priority: unspecified
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: mefos...@gmail.com
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
  Story Points: ---
  Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
 Documentation: ---



Spec URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org//commons-compiler.spec
SRPM URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org//commons-compiler-2.6.1-1.fc15.src.rpm

Description:
This package declares interfaces for the implementation of
an org.codehaus.commons.compiler.IExpressionEvaluator,
an org.codehaus.commons.compiler.IScriptEvaluator,
an org.codehaus.commons.compiler.IClassBodyEvaluator
and an org.codehaus.commons.compiler.ISimpleCompiler.
All of these adhere to the syntax of the Java programming language.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 784593] Review Request: ritopt - A Java library for parsing command-line options

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784593

Andrew Robinson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||arobi...@redhat.com
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|arobi...@redhat.com

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Robinson  2012-03-20 10:00:20 
EDT ---
I'll review this.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 805035] Review Request: janino-parent - Parent POM for Janino

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805035

Mary Ellen Foster  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||652183(FE-JAVASIG)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 805035] Review Request: janino-parent - Parent POM for Janino

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805035

Mary Ellen Foster  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||805037

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 805037] Review Request: commons-compiler - Summary of the package

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805037

Mary Ellen Foster  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||652183(FE-JAVASIG), 805035

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 805035] New: Review Request: janino-parent - Parent POM for Janino

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: janino-parent - Parent POM for Janino

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805035

   Summary: Review Request: janino-parent - Parent POM for Janino
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
  Severity: unspecified
  Priority: unspecified
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: mefos...@gmail.com
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
  Story Points: ---
  Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
 Documentation: ---



Spec URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org//janino-parent.spec
SRPM URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org//janino-parent-2.6.1-1.fc15.src.rpm

Description:
Parent POM for Janino.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 805035] Review Request: janino-parent - Parent POM for Janino

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805035

--- Comment #1 from Mary Ellen Foster  2012-03-20 09:55:36 
EDT ---
This package built on koji: 
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3913375

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 790628] Review Request: adobe-source-libraries - General Purpose Addon for Boost and STL

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790628

--- Comment #46 from Jaroslav Škarvada  2012-03-20 
09:45:59 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #42)
> Hi Alex, congrats on getting asl into Fedora.
> 
> Just a note regarding the changelog: there shouldn't be duplicate
> version-release entries listed. In Fedora, you must always increment the
> release when committing / building a package. 
> 
I also dislike it, but IMHO it should be OK if there was not no build:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Repeat_the_old_version_release_with_a_new_entry

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 790628] Review Request: adobe-source-libraries - General Purpose Addon for Boost and STL

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790628

--- Comment #44 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-20 09:41:50 EDT ---
adobe-source-libraries-1.0.43-7.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/adobe-source-libraries-1.0.43-7.fc16

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 784359] Review Request: qpid-gui-tools - GUI utilities for Red Hat MRG qpid

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784359

--- Comment #19 from Nuno Santos  2012-03-20 09:45:46 EDT 
---
There had been no activity on the review for over 3 weeks after Ernie posted
his last updates, so it was easy to conclude it was stalled/abandoned. It's
true I am not a sponsor, but I've done a large number of reviews and packaging
work, I believe my review stands and all that Ernie needs to do is find a
sponsor.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 790628] Review Request: adobe-source-libraries - General Purpose Addon for Boost and STL

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790628

--- Comment #45 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-20 09:42:55 EDT ---
adobe-source-libraries-1.0.43-7.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/adobe-source-libraries-1.0.43-7.fc17

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 790628] Review Request: adobe-source-libraries - General Purpose Addon for Boost and STL

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790628

--- Comment #42 from David Timms  2012-03-20 09:37:43 EDT 
---
Hi Alex, congrats on getting asl into Fedora.

Just a note regarding the changelog: there shouldn't be duplicate
version-release entries listed. In Fedora, you must always increment the
release when committing / building a package. 

If you are working on updates privately (while developing the changes), you
could simply add the extra change comments to the one changelog entry.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review