[Bug 768700] Review Request: sugar-flip - Simple strategic game of flipping coins

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768700

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-31 00:18:59 EDT ---
sugar-flip-3-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-flip-3-2.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 768700] Review Request: sugar-flip - Simple strategic game of flipping coins

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768700

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-31 00:19:08 EDT ---
sugar-flip-3-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-flip-3-2.fc17

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 768700] Review Request: sugar-flip - Simple strategic game of flipping coins

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768700

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-31 00:18:48 EDT ---
sugar-flip-3-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-flip-3-2.fc16

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 768700] Review Request: sugar-flip - Simple strategic game of flipping coins

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768700

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 605674] Review Request: perl-IO-InSitu - Avoid clobbering files opened for both input and output

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605674

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-IO-InSitu-0.0.2-6.fc16
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2012-03-30 23:14:44

--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-30 23:14:44 EDT ---
perl-IO-InSitu-0.0.2-6.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 798074] Review Request: z80dasm - Z80 Disassembler

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798074

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||z80dasm-1.1.2-1.fc16
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2012-03-30 23:23:46

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  2012-03-30 
23:23:46 EDT ---
z80dasm-1.1.2-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 798506] Review Request: ghc-cabal-file-th - Template Haskell expressions for reading cabal files

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798506

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|ghc-cabal-file-th-0.2.2-1.f |ghc-cabal-file-th-0.2.2-1.f
   |c15 |c16

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-30 23:23:00 EDT ---
ghc-cabal-file-th-0.2.2-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 798014] Review Request: trac-advancedticketworkflow-plugin - Advanced workflow operations Trac plugin

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798014

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|trac-advancedticketworkflow |trac-advancedticketworkflow
   |-plugin-0.11-1.20120227svn9 |-plugin-0.11-1.20120227svn9
   |962.fc15|962.fc16

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-30 23:21:34 EDT ---
trac-advancedticketworkflow-plugin-0.11-1.20120227svn9962.fc16 has been pushed
to the Fedora 16 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 734275] Review Request: aqemu - A QT graphical interface to QEMU and KVM

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734275

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|aqemu-0.8.2-7.fc15  |aqemu-0.8.2-7.fc16

--- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-30 23:17:53 EDT ---
aqemu-0.8.2-7.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 807375] Review Request: kwooty - A friendly nzb usenet binary download application

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807375

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-30 23:17:32 EDT ---
kwooty-0.8.3-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 790628] Review Request: adobe-source-libraries - General Purpose Addon for Boost and STL

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790628

--- Comment #48 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-30 23:20:04 EDT ---
adobe-source-libraries-1.0.43-7.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 798014] Review Request: trac-advancedticketworkflow-plugin - Advanced workflow operations Trac plugin

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798014

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||trac-advancedticketworkflow
   ||-plugin-0.11-1.20120227svn9
   ||962.fc15
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2012-03-30 23:19:43

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-30 23:19:43 EDT ---
trac-advancedticketworkflow-plugin-0.11-1.20120227svn9962.fc15 has been pushed
to the Fedora 15 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 798254] Review Request: perl-Config-Validator - Schema based configuration validation

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798254

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Config-Validator-0.3-1
   ||.fc16
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2012-03-30 23:20:28

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  2012-03-30 
23:20:28 EDT ---
perl-Config-Validator-0.3-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 794988] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Blowfish_PP - Blowfish encryption algorithm implemented purely in Perl

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794988

--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-30 23:17:03 EDT ---
perl-Crypt-Blowfish_PP-1.12-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802050] Review request: love - A free 2D game engine which enables easy game creation in Lua

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802050

--- Comment #24 from Rex Dieter  2012-03-30 23:33:05 EDT 
---
sponsored, next step is for you to request SCM access:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Add_Package_to_Source_Code_Management_.28SCM.29_system_and_Set_Owner

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802050] Review request: love - A free 2D game engine which enables easy game creation in Lua

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802050

Rex Dieter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)  |

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 786093] Review Request: python-windmill - A web application testing framework

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786093

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||python-windmill-1.7-0.2.git
   ||4304ee7.fc16
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2012-03-30 23:12:21

--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-30 23:12:21 EDT ---
python-windmill-1.7-0.2.git4304ee7.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 605674] Review Request: perl-IO-InSitu - Avoid clobbering files opened for both input and output

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605674

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-IO-InSitu-0.0.2-6.fc16
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2012-03-30 23:14:44

--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-30 23:14:44 EDT ---
perl-IO-InSitu-0.0.2-6.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 794985] Review Request: perl-Data-AMF - Serialize/deserialize Adobe's AMF (ActionMessageFormat) data

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794985

--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-30 23:15:24 EDT ---
perl-Data-AMF-0.09-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 734275] Review Request: aqemu - A QT graphical interface to QEMU and KVM

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734275

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|aqemu-0.8.2-7.fc17  |aqemu-0.8.2-7.fc15

--- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-30 23:11:40 EDT ---
aqemu-0.8.2-7.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 798506] Review Request: ghc-cabal-file-th - Template Haskell expressions for reading cabal files

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798506

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||ghc-cabal-file-th-0.2.2-1.f
   ||c15
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2012-03-30 23:04:02

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-30 23:04:02 EDT ---
ghc-cabal-file-th-0.2.2-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 684006] Review Request: perl-XML-Rules - API layer for XML::Parser

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684006

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-XML-Rules-1.10-7.fc16
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2012-03-30 23:03:48

--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-30 23:03:48 EDT ---
perl-XML-Rules-1.10-7.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 791363] Review Request: perl-XML-DTDParser - Quick and dirty DTD parser

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=791363

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-XML-DTDParser-2.01-3.f
   ||c16
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2012-03-30 23:06:21

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-30 23:06:21 EDT ---
perl-XML-DTDParser-2.01-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 790347] Review Request: gfal - grid file access library, library for wlcg

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790347

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|gfal-1.12.0-4.el6   |gfal-1.12.0-4.fc16

--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-30 23:00:16 EDT ---
gfal-1.12.0-4.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 797945] Review Request: trac-sumfields-plugin - Sums specified fields in custom queries

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797945

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||trac-sumfields-plugin-1.0.1
   ||-1.20120227svn10482.fc16
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2012-03-30 22:56:18

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-30 22:56:18 EDT ---
trac-sumfields-plugin-1.0.1-1.20120227svn10482.fc16 has been pushed to the
Fedora 16 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it
in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802050] Review request: love - A free 2D game engine which enables easy game creation in Lua

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802050

--- Comment #22 from Jeremy Newton  2012-03-30 17:23:36 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> (In reply to comment #15)
> > I take you're trying to run mari0? I can make an unstable version too if
> > there's interest, since I sort of have interest in using the unstable 
> > myself.
> 
> Indeed I am, there's someone else trying to run mari0 too on the games mailing
> list.
> 
> Thanks
> Martin

I'll get the unstable up and going as soon as I can; I made a wiki page to post
information on love in regards to Fedora. Please check up on it in a few days
to grab the unstable build: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L%C3%96VE/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802050] Review request: love - A free 2D game engine which enables easy game creation in Lua

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802050

--- Comment #23 from Jeremy Newton  2012-03-30 17:24:32 
EDT ---
Sorry the link should be https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L%C3%96VE

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802050] Review request: love - A free 2D game engine which enables easy game creation in Lua

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802050

--- Comment #21 from Jeremy Newton  2012-03-30 16:57:20 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> minor issue:
> - before you check in please pass %{?_smp_mflags} to the make command
> i.e. make %{?_smp_mflags}
> 
> don't remove it...we want a fast build, don't we? :)

Sure, will do. :)

(In reply to comment #19)
> If you don't mind a suggestion: Don't put a unstable package into the official
> repo. It's not discouraged or something like that but imho it's not worth the
> trouble to go through the review process. When you get sponsored you get 
> access
> to fedorapeople webspace. There you could host your "unofficial" unstable
> package and prepare it for the next stable release.
> 
> just my 2 cents ;)

You're right, that does make more sense, I'll look into making a wiki page on
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Project_Wiki

(In reply to comment #20)
> Jeremy, if you could share your Fedora Account System (FAS) username, I can 
> get
> you sponsored into the packager group

My FAS username is mystro256; is there anything else I need to do? Such as join
a group on FAS that I'm not already in? Also should I post a CVS request or do
you do that?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 808025] Review Request: libsecret - Library for storing and retrieving passwords and other secrets

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808025

Kalev Lember  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||libsecret-0.1-2.fc18
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2012-03-30 15:32:26

--- Comment #7 from Kalev Lember  2012-03-30 15:32:26 
EDT ---
Package imported and built.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 807375] Review Request: kwooty - A friendly nzb usenet binary download application

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807375

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 807375] Review Request: kwooty - A friendly nzb usenet binary download application

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807375

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  2012-03-30 
15:33:20 EDT ---
kwooty-0.8.3-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kwooty-0.8.3-2.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 807375] Review Request: kwooty - A friendly nzb usenet binary download application

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807375

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-30 15:36:03 EDT ---
kwooty-0.8.3-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kwooty-0.8.3-2.fc17

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 807375] Review Request: kwooty - A friendly nzb usenet binary download application

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807375

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-30 15:34:33 EDT ---
kwooty-0.8.3-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kwooty-0.8.3-2.fc16

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 768700] Review Request: sugar-flip - Simple strategic game of flipping coins

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768700

--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla  2012-03-30 15:25:05 EDT 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 768700] Review Request: sugar-flip - Simple strategic game of flipping coins

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768700

Kalpa Welivitigoda  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #8 from Kalpa Welivitigoda  2012-03-30 
15:16:52 EDT ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: sugar-flip
Short Description: Simple strategic game for sugar
Owners: callkalpa
Branches: f15 f16 f17
InitialCC: pbrobinson

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 808025] Review Request: libsecret - Library for storing and retrieving passwords and other secrets

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808025

Kalev Lember  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@zarb.org

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 768700] Review Request: sugar-flip - Simple strategic game of flipping coins

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768700

Ankur Sinha  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #7 from Ankur Sinha  2012-03-30 15:03:24 
EDT ---
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3949499

XXX APPROVED XXX

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 808258] Review Request: python-sh - Python module to simplify calling shell commands

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808258

--- Comment #2 from Andy Grover  2012-03-30 14:29:05 EDT ---
Hi Michael, issues addressed, updated files here:

spec: http://fedorapeople.org/~grover/new/python-sh.spec
srpm: http://fedorapeople.org/~grover/new/python-sh-0.95-2.el6.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 807375] Review Request: kwooty - A friendly nzb usenet binary download application

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807375

--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla  2012-03-30 14:26:47 EDT 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 768700] Review Request: sugar-flip - Simple strategic game of flipping coins

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768700

--- Comment #6 from Kalpa Welivitigoda  2012-03-30 
14:24:24 EDT ---
Hi Ankur,

setup.py removed.

Spec URL: http://callkalpa.fedorapeople.org/sugar-flip/sugar-flip.spec
SRPM URL:
http://callkalpa.fedorapeople.org/sugar-flip/sugar-flip-1-3.fc16.src.rpm

rpmlint sugar-flip.spec ../SRPMS/sugar-flip-1-3.fc16.src.rpm
../RPMS/noarch/sugar-flip-1-3.fc16.noarch.rpm 
sugar-flip.spec:6: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities
sugar-flip.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities
sugar-flip.noarch: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 807375] Review Request: kwooty - A friendly nzb usenet binary download application

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807375

--- Comment #7 from Gregor Tätzner  2012-03-30 14:17:31 EDT 
---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: kwooty
Short Description: A friendly nzb usenet binary download application
Owners: brummbq
Branches: f15 f16 f17
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 807375] Review Request: kwooty - A friendly nzb usenet binary download application

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807375

Gregor Tätzner  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802050] Review request: love - A free 2D game engine which enables easy game creation in Lua

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802050

Rex Dieter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|gre...@freenet.de

--- Comment #20 from Rex Dieter  2012-03-30 14:12:09 EDT 
---
Jeremy, if you could share your Fedora Account System (FAS) username, I can get
you sponsored into the packager group

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802377] Review Request: perl-Env-Sanctify - Lexically scoped sanctification of %ENV

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802377

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Env-Sanctify-1.06-1.fc
   ||18
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2012-03-30 14:08:25

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 806677] Review Request: jboss-web - JBoss Web Server

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806677

Anthony Sasadeusz  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2012-03-30 14:10:24

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 803057] Review Request: perl-Test-Valgrind - Generate suppressions, analyze and test any command with valgrind

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803057

Bug 803057 depends on bug 802377, which changed state.

Bug 802377 Summary: Review Request: perl-Env-Sanctify - Lexically scoped 
sanctification of %ENV
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802377

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE
 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802377] Review Request: perl-Env-Sanctify - Lexically scoped sanctification of %ENV

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802377

--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-30 14:07:02 EDT ---
perl-Env-Sanctify-1.06-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 711899] Review Request: opendnssec - DNSSEC key and zone management software

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711899

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-30 14:06:00 EDT ---
opendnssec-1.4.0-0.a1.el6.2 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802865] Review Request: perl-Perl-Destruct-Level - Allows you to change perl's internal destruction level

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802865

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  2012-03-30 
14:04:35 EDT ---
perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-0.02-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-0.02-2.el5

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802865] Review Request: perl-Perl-Destruct-Level - Allows you to change perl's internal destruction level

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802865

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  2012-03-30 
14:04:45 EDT ---
perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-0.02-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-0.02-2.el6

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 251128] Review Request: perl-Test-Script - Cross-platform basic tests for scripts

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251128

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-30 14:06:22 EDT ---
perl-Test-Script-1.06-1.el5.1 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802377] Review Request: perl-Env-Sanctify - Lexically scoped sanctification of %ENV

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802377

--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-30 14:05:39 EDT ---
perl-Env-Sanctify-1.06-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 463771] Package review: perl-Probe-Perl

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463771

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-30 14:04:26 EDT ---
perl-Probe-Perl-0.01-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 786213] Review Request: trac-agilo-plugin - A plugin for supporting the Scrum process in Trac

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786213

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-30 14:01:33 EDT ---
Package trac-agilo-plugin-0.9.7-2.fc17:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing
trac-agilo-plugin-0.9.7-2.fc17'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-4942/trac-agilo-plugin-0.9.7-2.fc17
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802050] Review request: love - A free 2D game engine which enables easy game creation in Lua

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802050

--- Comment #19 from Gregor Tätzner  2012-03-30 13:58:57 EDT 
---
(In reply to comment #17)
> (In reply to comment #16)
> > (In reply to comment #15)
> > > I take you're trying to run mari0? I can make an unstable version too if
> > > there's interest, since I sort of have interest in using the unstable 
> > > myself.
> > 
> > Indeed I am, there's someone else trying to run mari0 too on the games 
> > mailing
> > list.
> > 
> > Thanks
> > Martin
> 
> Alright, I'll post another review request for love unstable

If you don't mind a suggestion: Don't put a unstable package into the official
repo. It's not discouraged or something like that but imho it's not worth the
trouble to go through the review process. When you get sponsored you get access
to fedorapeople webspace. There you could host your "unofficial" unstable
package and prepare it for the next stable release.

just my 2 cents ;)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 700959] Review Request: TOPCOM - Triangulations Of Point Configurations and Oriented Matroids

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700959

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-30 14:01:07 EDT ---
TOPCOM-0.17.1-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 800526] Review Request: seahorse-sharing - Sharing of PGP public keys via DNS-SD and HKP

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800526

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-30 14:00:35 EDT ---
seahorse-sharing-3.4.0-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 806646] Review Request: perl-Data-Pond - Perl-based open notation for data

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806646

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  2012-03-30 
14:00:51 EDT ---
perl-Data-Pond-0.004-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 785694] Review Request: jpfcodegen - A tool for generating classes from JPF plug-ins

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785694

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  2012-03-30 
14:01:15 EDT ---
jpfcodegen-0.4-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 784593] Review Request: ritopt - A Java library for parsing command-line options

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784593

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-30 13:58:28 EDT ---
ritopt-0.2.1-5.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802050] Review request: love - A free 2D game engine which enables easy game creation in Lua

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802050

Gregor Tätzner  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #18 from Gregor Tätzner  2012-03-30 13:52:49 EDT 
---

Package Review
==

Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated



 C/C++ 
[x]: MUST Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: MUST Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: MUST Package contains no static executables.
[x]: MUST Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: MUST Package is not relocatable.


 Generic 
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
 least one supported primary architecture.
[x]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Buildroot is not present
 Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
 Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL is required
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
 Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
 Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[x]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
/home/greg/projects/Review/802050/love-0.7.2-linux-src.tar.gz :
  MD5SUM this package : c3e678606bb9a870c31168e85b269e7e
  MD5SUM upstream package : c3e678606bb9a870c31168e85b269e7e

[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[ ]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.

Generated by fedora-review 0.2.0git
External plugins:

>APPROVED<<
well done

minor issue:
- before you check in please pass %{?_smp_mflags} to the make command
i.e. make %{?_smp_mflags}

don't remove it...we want a fast build, don't we? :)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802865] Review Request: perl-Perl-Destruct-Level - Allows you to change perl's internal destruction level

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802865

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  2012-03-30 
13:56:32 EDT ---
perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-0.02-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-0.02-2.fc17

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802865] Review Request: perl-Perl-Destruct-Level - Allows you to change perl's internal destruction level

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802865

--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  2012-03-30 
13:56:23 EDT ---
perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-0.02-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-0.02-2.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802865] Review Request: perl-Perl-Destruct-Level - Allows you to change perl's internal destruction level

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802865

--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  2012-03-30 
13:55:52 EDT ---
perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-0.02-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-0.02-2.fc16

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802865] Review Request: perl-Perl-Destruct-Level - Allows you to change perl's internal destruction level

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802865

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 808350] Review Request: racket - Scheme Interpreter (Replacement for plt-scheme)

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808350

Jerry James  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||loganje...@gmail.com

--- Comment #2 from Jerry James  2012-03-30 13:39:53 EDT 
---
I took over some packages from Gérard Milmeister in February 2011 because he no
longer had time to maintain them (bigloo, clisp, ecl, ffcall, and polyml).

Daniel, can you send email to Gérard asking him if he intends to proceed with
the racket review?  If not, or if he doesn't respond in a reasonable amount of
time, then close bug 676124, and mark it as a duplicate of this bug.

It is also worth comparing his spec file to yours.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 768700] Review Request: sugar-flip - Simple strategic game of flipping coins

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768700

--- Comment #5 from Ankur Sinha  2012-03-30 13:14:15 
EDT ---
hello Kalpa,

I just confirmed. The setup.py file isn't supposed to install itself. Please
remove it from the rpm. It's an extraneous file and should not be included. If
one wants to see how the package works, they're supposed to download the
source, either from the source rpm or the source itself. 

The rest looks good to me. Please just remove the setup.py* files, and I will
approve the package :)

Thanks,
Ankur

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802865] Review Request: perl-Perl-Destruct-Level - Allows you to change perl's internal destruction level

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802865

--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla  2012-03-30 13:11:10 EDT 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 805037] Review Request: commons-compiler - Interfaces for an embedded Java compiler

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805037

Jerry James  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #6 from Jerry James  2012-03-30 12:58:12 EDT 
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Note that you can't download the POM from repo1.maven.org with wget 
> (permission
> denied), but you can download it through a web browser.

This works: "wget -U firefox
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/codehaus/janino/commons-compiler/2.6.1/commons-compiler-2.6.1.pom";.

There is only one remaining issue, which I forgot to highlight by copying to
the "Issues" section at the bottom.  Sorry about that; this is my first time
using fedora-review, after all.  Anyway, the last issue is this:

> [!]: SHOULD Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
>  files.  Add "-p" to "cp %{SOURCE1} ./pom.xml".

With the new source numbering, -p should be added to the cp commands for both
SOURCE1 and SOURCE2.  I trust you to do that before importing this package.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802865] Review Request: perl-Perl-Destruct-Level - Allows you to change perl's internal destruction level

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802865

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth  2012-03-30 12:53:43 EDT ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: perl-Perl-Destruct-Level
Short Description: Allows you to change perl's internal destruction level
Owners: pghmcfc
Branches: f15 f16 f17 el5 el6
InitialCC:  perl-sig

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 800930] Review Request: redeclipse - Multiplayer FPS game based on Cube2

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800930

--- Comment #39 from Martin Erik Werner  2012-03-30 
12:55:03 EDT ---
No worries, I kind of guessed that :)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 808025] Review Request: libsecret - Library for storing and retrieving passwords and other secrets

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808025

--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla  2012-03-30 12:38:14 EDT 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Michael, please take ownership of review BZs.  Thanks!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 768700] Review Request: sugar-flip - Simple strategic game of flipping coins

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768700

--- Comment #4 from Kalpa Welivitigoda  2012-03-30 
12:33:21 EDT ---
Hi Ankur thanks for the review. Here are the new files, hope now it is good to
go.

This runs in sugar-emulator so there's no need of a desktop file.

Group, although not standard it is the one for sugar activities.

Sugar packaging guide doesn't say about excluding setup.py. Perhaps if it is
there children who use the activity can see it's source and learn. That may be
the reason.

Spec URL: http://callkalpa.fedorapeople.org/sugar-flip/sugar-flip.spec
SRPM URL:
http://callkalpa.fedorapeople.org/sugar-flip/sugar-flip-1-2.fc16.src.rpm

rpmlint sugar-flip.spec ../SRPMS/sugar-flip-1-2.fc16.src.rpm
../RPMS/noarch/sugar-flip-1-2.fc16.noarch.rpm 
sugar-flip.spec:6: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities
sugar-flip.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities
sugar-flip.noarch: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 808025] Review Request: libsecret - Library for storing and retrieving passwords and other secrets

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808025

Kalev Lember  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #5 from Kalev Lember  2012-03-30 12:31:48 
EDT ---
Thanks for the review!

New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: libsecret
Short Description: Library for storing and retrieving passwords and other
secrets
Owners: kalev
Branches:
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 806646] Review Request: perl-Data-Pond - Perl-based open notation for data

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806646

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 806646] Review Request: perl-Data-Pond - Perl-based open notation for data

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806646

--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  2012-03-30 
12:29:49 EDT ---
perl-Data-Pond-0.004-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Data-Pond-0.004-2.fc16

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 806646] Review Request: perl-Data-Pond - Perl-based open notation for data

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806646

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  2012-03-30 
12:30:35 EDT ---
perl-Data-Pond-0.004-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Data-Pond-0.004-2.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 806646] Review Request: perl-Data-Pond - Perl-based open notation for data

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806646

--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  2012-03-30 
12:30:21 EDT ---
perl-Data-Pond-0.004-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Data-Pond-0.004-2.fc17

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 808336] Review Request: dia-gnomeDIAicons - Beautiful icon set for dia diagram editor

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808336

--- Comment #8 from Arthur Buliva  2012-03-30 
12:24:06 EDT ---
Changed. http://arthurbuliva.com/sites/default/files/dia-gnomeDIAicons.spec

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 808336] Review Request: dia-gnomeDIAicons - Beautiful icon set for dia diagram editor

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808336

Peter Lemenkov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov  2012-03-30 12:13:26 EDT 
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Is this OK now?
> 
> http://arthurbuliva.com/sites/default/files/dia-gnomeDIAicons.spec

Almost. I see only two remaining issues.

* You accidentally changed previously perfectly valid "Url" field. Its current
value should go to the Source0 field.

* License still GPLv2+. It must be GPL+.

Both of these are easy-to fix issues so, please, fix them and this package is


APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 808025] Review Request: libsecret - Library for storing and retrieving passwords and other secrets

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808025

Michael Scherer  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #4 from Michael Scherer  2012-03-30 12:06:17 EDT ---

Package Review
==

Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated



 C/C++ 
[x]: MUST Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: MUST ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: MUST Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: MUST Package contains no static executables.
[x]: MUST Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: MUST Package is not relocatable.
[x]: MUST Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if
 present.


 Generic 
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
 least one supported primary architecture.
[x]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Buildroot is not present
 Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
 Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL is required
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
 Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
 Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[x]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: MUST License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: MUST If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[-]: MUST Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. (EPEL5)
 Note: Only applicable for EL-5
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.

rpmlint libsecret-0.1-1.fc18.i686.rpm

libsecret.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US keyring -> keying, key
ring, key-ring
libsecret.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/libsecret-0.1/COPYING
libsecret.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary secret-tool
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.


rpmlint libsecret-0.1-1.fc18.src.rpm

libsecret.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US keyring -> keying, key
ring, key-ring
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.


rpmlint libsecret-devel-0.1-1.fc18.i686.rpm

1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.


rpmlint libsecret-debuginfo-0.1-1.fc18.i686.rpm

libsecret-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/libsecret-0.1/egg/egg-secure-memory.c
libsecret-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/libsecret-0.1/egg/egg-secure-memory.h
libsecret-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/libsecret-0.1/egg/egg-libgcrypt.h
libsecret-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/libsecret-0.1/egg/egg-l

[Bug 700959] Review Request: TOPCOM - Triangulations Of Point Configurations and Oriented Matroids

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700959

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-30 12:02:09 EDT ---
TOPCOM-0.17.1-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/TOPCOM-0.17.1-3.fc17

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 700959] Review Request: TOPCOM - Triangulations Of Point Configurations and Oriented Matroids

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700959

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  
2012-03-30 12:02:27 EDT ---
TOPCOM-0.17.1-3.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/TOPCOM-0.17.1-3.fc16

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 808025] Review Request: libsecret - Library for storing and retrieving passwords and other secrets

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808025

--- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember  2012-03-30 12:02:34 
EDT ---
Thanks Michael!

Opened a ticket upstream with the FSF address issue:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=673194

Spec URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/libsecret.spec
SRPM URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/libsecret-0.1-2.fc17.src.rpm

* Fri Mar 30 2012 Kalev Lember  - 0.1-2
- Add provides bundled(egglib) (#808025)
- Use global instead of define

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 700959] Review Request: TOPCOM - Triangulations Of Point Configurations and Oriented Matroids

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700959

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 800930] Review Request: redeclipse - Multiplayer FPS game based on Cube2

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800930

Tom "spot" Callaway  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||dw...@infradead.org
  Component|Package Review  |0x
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dw...@infradead.org

--- Comment #38 from Tom "spot" Callaway  2012-03-30 
11:58:41 EDT ---
I haven't forgotten about this, I've just been super super busy this week.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 808336] Review Request: dia-gnomeDIAicons - Beautiful icon set for dia diagram editor

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808336

--- Comment #6 from Arthur Buliva  2012-03-30 
11:53:17 EDT ---
Is this OK now?

http://arthurbuliva.com/sites/default/files/dia-gnomeDIAicons.spec

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802050] Review request: love - A free 2D game engine which enables easy game creation in Lua

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802050

--- Comment #17 from Jeremy Newton  2012-03-30 11:50:46 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> (In reply to comment #15)
> > I take you're trying to run mari0? I can make an unstable version too if
> > there's interest, since I sort of have interest in using the unstable 
> > myself.
> 
> Indeed I am, there's someone else trying to run mari0 too on the games mailing
> list.
> 
> Thanks
> Martin

Alright, I'll post another review request for love unstable

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 806646] Review Request: perl-Data-Pond - Perl-based open notation for data

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806646

--- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell  2012-03-30 11:44:20 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> 
> Issues:
> TODO: Don't require Exporter and Carp.  Exporter is picked up automatically 
> and
> Carp isn't actually used anywhere (just required by in Build.PL).

Ah, the Carp requirement seems to be left over from a previous version - it's
only croaking from XS now. I've left Exporter as it's not picked up
automatically outside rawhide.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 806669] Review Request: janino - An embedded Java compiler

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806669

Mary Ellen Foster  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||805487

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 805487] Review Request: logback - A Java logging library

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805487

Mary Ellen Foster  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on|805047  |806669

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 805047] Review Request: janino - An embedded Java compiler

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805047

Mary Ellen Foster  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|805487  |

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 808025] Review Request: libsecret - Library for storing and retrieving passwords and other secrets

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808025

--- Comment #2 from Michael Scherer  2012-03-30 11:33:52 EDT ---
Also, since the package bundle libegg, you should add a provide :
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries#Packages_granted_exceptions
 

the rational is to be able to find every instance of the aformentioned library
in case it need a update.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 785694] Review Request: jpfcodegen - A tool for generating classes from JPF plug-ins

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785694

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  2012-03-30 
11:31:53 EDT ---
jpfcodegen-0.4-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jpfcodegen-0.4-3.fc17

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802865] Review Request: perl-Perl-Destruct-Level - Allows you to change perl's internal destruction level

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802865

--- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell  2012-03-30 11:31:29 EDT ---
APPROVED.

koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3947823

Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (GPL+ or Artistic);
make test passes cleanly.

Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum):
7b3845ecb47a70b03b4487639df98969f243efc8 Perl-Destruct-Level-0.02.tar.gz
7b3845ecb47a70b03b4487639df98969f243efc8 Perl-Destruct-Level-0.02.tar.gz.srpm

Final provides / requires are sane:

==> perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-0.02-2.fc18.src.rpm <==
> rpmlint
perl-Perl-Destruct-Level.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US perls ->
Perls, peels, perks
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
> spelling
perl-Perl-Destruct-Level.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US perls ->
Perls, peels, perks
> provides
> requires
perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)  
perl(Test::More)  
perl(XSLoader)  
> obsoletes
> conflicts

==> perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-0.02-2.fc18.x86_64.rpm <==
> rpmlint
perl-Perl-Destruct-Level.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US perls
-> Perls, peels, perks
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
> spelling
perl-Perl-Destruct-Level.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US perls
-> Perls, peels, perks
> provides
perl(Perl::Destruct::Level) = 0.02
perl-Perl-Destruct-Level = 0.02-2.fc18
perl-Perl-Destruct-Level(x86-64) = 0.02-2.fc18
> requires
libc.so.6()(64bit)  
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)  
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)  
perl(strict)  
perl(warnings)  
perl(XSLoader)  
rtld(GNU_HASH)  
> obsoletes
> conflicts

==> perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-debuginfo-0.02-2.fc18.x86_64.rpm <==
> rpmlint
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
> provides
perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-debuginfo = 0.02-2.fc18
perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-debuginfo(x86-64) = 0.02-2.fc18
> requires
> obsoletes
> conflicts


> mock install
INFO: mock.py version 1.1.21 starting...
State Changed: init plugins
INFO: selinux enabled
State Changed: start
Mock Version: 1.1.21
INFO: Mock Version: 1.1.21
State Changed: lock buildroot
INFO: installing package(s): perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-0.02-2.fc18.x86_64.rpm
perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-debuginfo-0.02-2.fc18.x86_64.rpm
INFO: 

 Package
  Arch   Version  Repository   Size

Installing:
 perl-Perl-Destruct-Level
  x86_64 0.02-2.fc18  /perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-0.02-2.fc18.x86_64 14 k
 perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-debuginfo
  x86_64 0.02-2.fc18 
/perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-debuginfo-0.02-2.fc18.x86_64
   54 k

Transaction Summary

Install   2 Packages

Total size: 68 k
Installed size: 68 k

Installed:
  perl-Perl-Destruct-Level.x86_64 0:0.02-2.fc18 
  perl-Perl-Destruct-Level-debuginfo.x86_64 0:0.02-2.fc18   


State Changed: unlock buildroot
State Changed: end

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 806669] Review Request: janino - An embedded Java compiler

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806669

Mary Ellen Foster  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mefos...@gmail.com

--- Comment #3 from Mary Ellen Foster  2012-03-30 11:29:28 
EDT ---
I'll review this; just waiting for commons-compiler review to finish

(NB: janino-parent is already accepted, and I've already got a separate package
for commons-compiler under review, so you can probably just package the
"janino" parts separately in this RPM)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 808025] Review Request: libsecret - Library for storing and retrieving passwords and other secrets

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808025

Michael Scherer  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||m...@zarb.org
   Flag||fedora-review?

--- Comment #1 from Michael Scherer  2012-03-30 11:29:04 EDT ---
Hi,

a few comments :
- the address of the FSF is wrong in the license, you should warn upstream of
it
- you should use %global instead of %define

Otherwise, look good to start a formal review ( and a bug fix for fedora-review
who say there is multiple tag "release" found ... ).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 805487] Review Request: logback - A Java logging library

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805487

Bug 805487 depends on bug 805047, which changed state.

Bug 805047 Summary: Review Request: janino - An embedded Java compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805047

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Resolution||DUPLICATE
 Status|NEW |CLOSED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 806669] Review Request: janino - An embedded Java compiler

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806669

Mary Ellen Foster  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mefos...@gmail.com

--- Comment #2 from Mary Ellen Foster  2012-03-30 11:26:57 
EDT ---
*** Bug 805047 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802865] Review Request: perl-Perl-Destruct-Level - Allows you to change perl's internal destruction level

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802865

Iain Arnell  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

  1   2   >