[Bug 812583] New: Review Request: perl-FusionInventory-Agent-Task-NetInventory - Remote inventory support for FusionInventory Agent
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-FusionInventory-Agent-Task-NetInventory - Remote inventory support for FusionInventory Agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812583 Summary: Review Request: perl-FusionInventory-Agent-Task-NetInventory - Remote inventory support for FusionInventory Agent Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fed...@famillecollet.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/remicollet/remirepo/master/perl-FusionInventory-Agent-Task-NetInventory/perl-FusionInventory-Agent-Task-NetInventory.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/perl-FusionInventory-Agent-Task-NetInventory-2.1-1.remi.src.rpm Description: This task allows the FusionInventory agent to extracts various informations from remote hosts through SNMP protocol: * printer cartridges and counters status * router/switch ports status * relations between devices and router/switch ports -- The package perl-FusionInventory-Agent-Task-SNMPQuery, already in the repository, have been renamed by upstream. The new package/version is needed to update Agent to version 2.2.0 Others SRPMS needed for this review: http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/fusioninventory-agent-2.2.0-1.remi.src.rpm http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/perl-FusionInventory-Agent-Task-NetDiscovery-2.1-1.remi.src.rpm I plan an update in fedora 17 ASAP, and in other branches and EPEL later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 696249] Review Request: kupfer - an interface for quick and convenient access to applications and their documents.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696249 --- Comment #21 from hannes 2012-04-15 02:40:25 EDT --- There is a new version of kupfer v207 available. But I think this Review is mostly dead. Perhaps we should open a new one and try to get the review done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 812573] New: Review Request: mingw-gstreamer-plugins-good - Cross compiled GStreamer plug-ins good
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw-gstreamer-plugins-good - Cross compiled GStreamer plug-ins good https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812573 Summary: Review Request: mingw-gstreamer-plugins-good - Cross compiled GStreamer plug-ins good Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: m...@cchtml.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/mingw-gstreamer-plugins-good.spec SRPM URL: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/mingw-gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.31-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: The MinGW version of the gstreamer-plugins-good package in Fedora. Carried over from the fedora-cross repo. This package requires gstreamer and gstreamer-plugins-base 0.10.36, which are not yet in F17/Rawhide, but they will be shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 812575] New: Review Request: mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free - Cross compiled GStreamer plug-ins "bad"
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free - Cross compiled GStreamer plug-ins "bad" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812575 Summary: Review Request: mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free - Cross compiled GStreamer plug-ins "bad" Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: m...@cchtml.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free.spec SRPM URL: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.10.23-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: The MinGW version of the gstreamer-plugins-bad-free package in Fedora. Carried over from the fedora-cross repo. This package requires gstreamer and gstreamer-plugins-base 0.10.36, which are not yet in F17/Rawhide, but they will be shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 802050] Review request: love - A free 2D game engine which enables easy game creation in Lua
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802050 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|love-0.8.0-2.fc15 |love-0.8.0-2.fc16 --- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System 2012-04-14 19:22:04 EDT --- love-0.8.0-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 802050] Review request: love - A free 2D game engine which enables easy game creation in Lua
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802050 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|love-0.8.0-2.fc17 |love-0.8.0-2.fc15 --- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System 2012-04-14 19:21:50 EDT --- love-0.8.0-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 809633] Review Request: perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-LibXML - HTML::TreeBuilder and XPath compatible interface with libxml
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809633 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-LibXM |perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-LibXM |L-0.16-2.fc17 |L-0.16-2.fc16 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2012-04-14 19:20:57 EDT --- perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-LibXML-0.16-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 812561] New: Review Request: python-ipdb - IPython enabled Python debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-ipdb - IPython enabled Python debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812561 Summary: Review Request: python-ipdb - IPython enabled Python debugger Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: b...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://bcl.fedorapeople.org/python-ipdb/python-ipdb.spec SRPM URL: http://bcl.fedorapeople.org/python-ipdb/python-ipdb-0.7-1.20120414git.fc16.src.rpm Description: IPython features (tab completion, syntax highlighting, better tracebacks, better introspection) right in pdb. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 812559] New: Review Request: python-Rtree - Python wrapper of the spatialindex library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-Rtree - Python wrapper of the spatialindex library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812559 Summary: Review Request: python-Rtree - Python wrapper of the spatialindex library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: volke...@gmx.at QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://www.geofrogger.net/review/python-Rtree.spec SRPM URL: http://www.geofrogger.net/review/python-Rtree-0.7.0-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: Rtree is a ctypes Python wrapper of the spatialindex library, that provides a number of advanced spatial indexing features for the spatially curious Python user. These features include: -Nearest neighbor search -Intersection search -Multi-dimensional indexes -Clustered indexes (store Python pickles directly with index entries) -Bulk loading -Deletion -Disk serialization -Custom storage implementation (to implement spatial indexing in ZODB, for example) Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3991455 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 --- Comment #115 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2012-04-14 15:10:22 EDT --- Now including nginx-passenger as well: New SPEC: http://kanarip.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-passenger.spec New SRPM: http://kanarip.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-passenger-3.0.12-1.fc16.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 662259] Review Request: git-annex - Manage files with git, without checking their contents in
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662259 --- Comment #19 from Joey Hess 2012-04-14 14:33:47 EDT --- An S3 flag in git-annex.cabal was a good idea. That is done in git, so without the S3 library it will auto-disable S3 support now. Glad to see bloomfilter is getting packaged. Nice thing to have available in general. :) SHA is fairly core, I could make a branch without it, but it would lose support for encrypting content. If packaging SHA turns out to be a problem, let me know and I'll work something out. IIRC it's a fairly simple library to build. I could easily spin a branch without IfElse (about a 4 line patch), or it should be trivial to package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 743615] Review Request: nagios-plugins-openmanage - Nagios plugin to monitor hardware health on Dell servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=743615 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|nagios-plugins-openmanage-3 |nagios-plugins-openmanage-3 |.7.3-3.el5 |.7.3-3.el6 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2012-04-14 14:00:09 EDT --- nagios-plugins-openmanage-3.7.3-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 743615] Review Request: nagios-plugins-openmanage - Nagios plugin to monitor hardware health on Dell servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=743615 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|nagios-plugins-openmanage-3 |nagios-plugins-openmanage-3 |.7.3-3.fc16 |.7.3-3.el5 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2012-04-14 13:59:26 EDT --- nagios-plugins-openmanage-3.7.3-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 604501] Review Request: gtk-chtheme - Gtk+ 2.0 theme preview and selection made slick
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604501 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|gtk-chtheme-0.3.1-6.fc13|gtk-chtheme-0.3.1-11.el6 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2012-04-14 13:58:36 EDT --- gtk-chtheme-0.3.1-11.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 807331] Review Request: drupal6-addthis - AddThis module for Drupal6.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807331 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2012-04-14 13:59:10 EDT --- drupal6-addthis-3.0-6.beta2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 753517] Review Request: hoard - scalable memory allocator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753517 --- Comment #6 from Eric Hopper 2012-04-14 13:30:31 EDT --- Is this going to be in Fedora 17? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 809614] Review Request: gfal2 - Grid file access library 2.0
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809614 --- Comment #7 from adev 2012-04-14 13:15:50 EDT --- Updated from the comments : Spec URL: http://firwen.org/home/specs/gfal2.spec SRPM URL: http://firwen.org/home/specs/gfal2-2.0.0-0.6.beta.el5.centos.src.rpm > If you're building the tar upstream from an evolving branch, consider adding a > date, as in: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control > > I think it would be cleaner, it will help you debug later. Thank you for the advice :) I will act like this in my next reviews. > You seem to have added for all but gfal2 and gfal2-transfer. Maybe add it > there > too? Corrected . Regards, Adrien -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 --- Comment #114 from Brett Lentz 2012-04-14 13:11:19 EDT --- Jeroen - Thanks for posting your specs. I'll look them over and incorporate them into my final version on Monday. I've got a few things I want to do a bit differently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 809614] Review Request: gfal2 - Grid file access library 2.0
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809614
--- Comment #6 from Ricardo Rocha 2012-04-14 12:42:06
EDT ---
Hi.
(In reply to comment #5)
> Thank you a lot Ricardo for this review,
> I have updated the sources from your comments.
>
> Spec URL: http://firwen.org/home/specs/gfal2.spec
> SRPM URL: http://firwen.org/home/specs/gfal2-2.0.0-0.6.beta.el5.centos.src.rpm
>
>
> > W: spelling-error
>
> -> all corrected, descriptions have been updated for more explicit ones.
>
> > gfal2.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gfal2_version
>
> -> done
A patch would have been fine too. I see you updated the tarball without
changing the version - probably not a good idea to do it again i guess,
otherwise you'll get inconsistencies between what is pointed by the spec and
what's in the srpm.
If you're building the tar upstream from an evolving branch, consider adding a
date, as in:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control
I think it would be cleaner, it will help you debug later.
> > gfal2-core.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/lib64/libgfal2.so.2.0.0
>
> GFAL 2.0 uses a lot the GCC C nested functions in the current state, the
> nested
> functions usage needs an executable-stack. This cannot be avoided.
Ok, i'll let you decide if you want to add a bug upstream to fix it later.
> > MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
> > Sorry for pointing this again, but i find it confusing to have a new package
> > due to a backwards incompatible change.
>
> Proceed to a so bump will break existing working packages that relies on gfal
> (
> 1.0 ) functionalities that has been suppressed on gfal 2.0. this will probably
> cause more troubles than benefits.
> Concerning the versioning the old gfal, several externals meta-packages ( EMI
> project, glite-projects ) depends directly on the gfal package names in
> differents project, and I wish to not not break this.
>
> Indeed, several populars packages like glib -> glib2, gtk -> gtk2, sqlite ->
> sqlite2, glade -> glade2, ... etc.. proceed in the same way than gfal ->
> gfal2.
> I think that the changes between gfal 1.0 and gfal 2.0 are too big to be
> considered like a simple update, or a transparent name swap.
Ok.
>
> > MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
> > package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} =
> > %{version}-%{release}
>
> -> corrected too.
You seem to have added for all but gfal2 and gfal2-transfer. Maybe add it there
too?
Let me know what you think, this should be pretty much done.
Regards,
Ricardo
>
> Thank you again.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 812538] New: Review Request: herbstluftwm - Tiling window manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: herbstluftwm - Tiling window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812538 Summary: Review Request: herbstluftwm - Tiling window manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: co...@octayn.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://octayn.net/herbstluftwm.spec SRPM URL: http://octayn.net/herbstluftwm-0.3-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: herbstluftwm is a manual tiling window manager for X, meaning frames are manually split into sub-frames, where windows can be placed. All configuration is done using IPC, so it is language-agnostic. The included herbstclient program provides a simple interface. Custom layouts are possible. Rules and hooks allow great flexibility. herbstluftwm can also float windows. This is my first package and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 812538] Review Request: herbstluftwm - Tiling window manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812538 Corey Richardson (:Octayn) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||co...@octayn.net Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 --- Comment #113 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2012-04-14 11:57:09 EDT --- Still a work in progress, and only shipping the gem and apache module. Builds using mock for el5, el6, f16, f17 and rawhide. New SPEC: http://kanarip.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-passenger.spec New SRPM: http://kanarip.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-passenger-3.0.12-1.fc16.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569582] Review Request: udev-browse - Udev browser tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569582 Lennart Poettering changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Lennart Poettering 2012-04-14 09:28:05 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: udev-browse Short Description: Graphical tool for browsing and exploring the udev/sysfs tree. Owners: lennart kay Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 807760] Review Request: jbigkit - JBIG1 lossless image compression tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807760 Peter Lemenkov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||lemen...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lemen...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2012-04-14 08:06:01 EDT --- I'll review it (since now they are expired for sure). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670007] Review Request: ghc-bloomfilter - A fast, space efficient Bloom filter implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670007 Lakshmi Narasimhan changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|notready|Ready --- Comment #4 from Lakshmi Narasimhan 2012-04-14 07:53:09 EDT --- http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/ghc-bloomfilter.spec http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-bloomfilter-1.2.6.8-1.fc15.src.rpm rpmlint output: rpmlint -i ghc-bloomfilter-1.2.6.8-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm ghc-bloomfilter-devel-1.2.6.8-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm ghc-bloomfilter-1.2.6.8-1.fc15.src.rpm ../ghc-bloomfilter.spec 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3990656 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 662259] Review Request: git-annex - Manage files with git, without checking their contents in
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662259 Lakshmi Narasimhan changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||670007(ghc-bloomfilter) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670007] Review Request: ghc-bloomfilter - A fast, space efficient Bloom filter implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670007 Lakshmi Narasimhan changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||662259(git-annex) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 --- Comment #112 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2012-04-14 07:50:44 EDT --- I'll update these to the later version and the new Ruby ABI requirements for rawhide/f17 later today: New SPEC: http://git.kolabsys.com/rpm/rubygem-passenger/plain/rubygem-passenger.spec New SRPM: http://mirror.kolabsys.com/pub/redhat/kolab-2.4/el6/development/SRPMS/rubygem-passenger-2.2.15-1.el6.kolab_2.4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 812526] New: Review Request: kolab-webadmin - Kolab Groupware Web Administration Panel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kolab-webadmin - Kolab Groupware Web Administration Panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812526 Summary: Review Request: kolab-webadmin - Kolab Groupware Web Administration Panel Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kana...@kanarip.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://git.kolabsys.com/rpm/kolab-webadmin/plain/kolab-webadmin.spec SRPM URL: http://mirror.kolabsys.com/pub/redhat/kolab-2.4/el6/development/SRPMS/kolab-webadmin-2.4.0-3.el6.kolab_2.4.src.rpm Description: Flexible user and group Web administration panel for Kolab Groupware. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 626004] Review Request: osm2pgsql - Imports map data from OpenStreetMap to a PostgreSQL database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626004 --- Comment #19 from Fabian Affolter 2012-04-14 06:37:07 EDT --- I reworked the patch to remove the gazetteer stuff. Now I able to build this package again. Updated files: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/osm2pgsql.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/osm2pgsql-0.70.5-0.8.20120413svn.fc16.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 662259] Review Request: git-annex - Manage files with git, without checking their contents in
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662259 Lakshmi Narasimhan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lakshminaras2...@gmail.com --- Comment #18 from Lakshmi Narasimhan 2012-04-14 05:50:11 EDT --- Bloomfilter package. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670007 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670007] Review Request: ghc-bloomfilter - A fast, space efficient Bloom filter implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670007 Lakshmi Narasimhan changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(lakshminaras2002@ | |gmail.com) | --- Comment #3 from Lakshmi Narasimhan 2012-04-14 05:49:45 EDT --- Hi Jens, git-annex needs this now. I will update the spec file and srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670007] Review Request: ghc-bloomfilter - A fast, space efficient Bloom filter implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670007 Lakshmi Narasimhan changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|low |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 809114] Review Request: novacom-server - Utility to connect to WebOS devices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809114 Jonathan Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pikachu.2...@gmail.com --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Dieter 2012-04-14 05:37:15 EDT --- Mohamed, I went ahead and assigned this to you. Is there anything else you think I need to do with this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
