[Bug 820544] Review Request: libguac-client-rdp - RDP support for guacd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820544 --- Comment #33 from Simone Caronni --- Any news? Have you tried to build the package? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 822424] Review Request: jboss-jaxrs-1.1-api - Java API for RESTful Web Services (JAX-RS) 1.1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822424 Mikolaj Izdebski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 808769] Review Request: jaxb2-common-basics - JAXB2 Basics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808769 Mikolaj Izdebski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 815511] Review Request: python-django-lint - Analyzes Django code looking for bugs and signs of poor quality
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815511 Matthias Runge changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Matthias Runge --- Thank you for the review. I'll take another look into obsoletes to make sure, they're correct before committing package. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-django-lint Short Description: Analyzes Django code looking for bugs and signs of poor quality Owners: mrunge Branches: devel -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 827690] Review Request: ghc-sized-types - Provides indices, matrixes, and bit vectors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827690 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-sized-types-0.3.4.0-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-sized-types-0.3.4.0-1.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 827690] Review Request: ghc-sized-types - Provides indices, matrixes, and bit vectors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827690 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-sized-types-0.3.4.0-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-sized-types-0.3.4.0-1.fc16 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 827690] Review Request: ghc-sized-types - Provides indices, matrixes, and bit vectors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827690 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RELEASE_PENDING |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 827804] Review Request: python-cliapp - Python framework for Unix command line programs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827804 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- python-cliapp-0.29-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-cliapp-0.29-2.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 827804] Review Request: python-cliapp - Python framework for Unix command line programs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827804 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- python-cliapp-0.29-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-cliapp-0.29-2.fc16 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 827804] Review Request: python-cliapp - Python framework for Unix command line programs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827804 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 826955] Review Request: apache-commons-chain - An implementation of the GoF Chain of Responsibility pattern
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826955
--- Comment #2 from Mikolaj Izdebski ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one supported primary architecture.
[x]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Buildroot is not present
Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL is required
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[x]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[!]: MUST License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
The NOTICE.txt file is not included in javadoc package.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
rpmlint apache-commons-chain-javadoc-1.2-1.fc18.noarch.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint apache-commons-chain-1.2-1.fc18.noarch.rpm
apache-commons-chain.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US patten ->
pattern, patent, patter
apache-commons-chain.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US boolean ->
Boolean, boo lean, boo-lean
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
rpmlint apache-commons-chain-1.2-1.fc18.src.rpm
apache-commons-chain.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US patten ->
pattern, patent, patter
apache-commons-chain.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US boolean ->
Boolean, boo lean, boo-lean
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
/home/kojan/review/826955/commons-chain-1.2-src.tar.gz :
MD5SUM this package : a94fef07630d88c859fb8397ddbcb6ba
MD5SUM upstream package : a94fef07630d88c859fb8397ddbcb6ba
[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[-]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
/usr/sbin.
[x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
--requires).
[x]: SHOULD Package functions as described.
[!]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged.
The latest upstream version is 1.3-SNAPSHOT.
[x]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from
upstream.
[!]: SHOULD Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
[Bug 824628] Review Request: python-qrcode - Pure python QR Code generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824628 --- Comment #10 from Michel Alexandre Salim --- (In reply to comment #9) > Oh, I didn't even think to look on pypi -- I just looked in the "Files" > section on github and didn't see anything there. > That happens -- I've just seen something even weirder - upstream's homepage, PyPI and Debian disagreeing on which version of the package is the latest (upstream in this case is a Debian developer) > Michel -- if you would like to maintain this package, I'm perfectly fine > with that. My hands are plenty full at the moment. :) No problem! Do you still want to still be the reviewee, though? Or should we close this as a duplicate and re-open the other review request? In the latter case I can make you the co-maintainer once the review is finished. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828626] New: Review Request: saslwrapper - Ruby and Python wrappers for the Cyrus SASL library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828626 Bug ID: 828626 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: saslwrapper - Ruby and Python wrappers for the Cyrus SASL library Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: dcall...@redhat.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~dcallagh/saslwrapper/saslwrapper.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~dcallagh/saslwrapper/saslwrapper-0.16-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: A simple wrapper for Cyrus SASL that permits easy binding into scripting languages. The qpid bindings use this to provide SASL authentication (e.g. Kerberos). Fedora Account System Username: dcallagh -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828544] New: Review Request: megaglest-data - Mega Glest data files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828544 Bug ID: 828544 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: megaglest-data - Mega Glest data files Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pcpa/megaglest-data.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pcpa/megaglest-data-3.6.0.3-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: MegaGlest is an open source 3D-real-time strategy game, where you control the armies of one of seven different factions: Tech, Magic, Egyptians, Indians, Norsemen, Persian or Romans. The game is setup in one of 16 naturally looking settings, which -like the unit models- are crafted with great appreciation for detail. Additional game data can be downloaded from within the game at no cost. Fedora Account System Username: pcpa -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 753900] Review Request: abi-compliance-checker - An ABI Compliance Checker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753900 Richard Shaw changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #21 from Richard Shaw --- Sounds like a plan! I set the cvs flag for you, I forget that all the time :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 753900] Review Request: abi-compliance-checker - An ABI Compliance Checker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753900 --- Comment #20 from Orion Poplawski --- I think just removing the version requirement is the way to go. Thanks! Package Change Request == Package Name: abi-compliance-checker New Branches: el6 Owners: orion InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 753900] Review Request: abi-compliance-checker - An ABI Compliance Checker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753900
--- Comment #19 from Richard Shaw ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> I'd like to see this in EPEL 6. Richard, do you have any interest in
> maintaining there, or shall I?
You're more than welcome to. I thought it would probably be nice to have but
they release fairly frequently so keeping it up to date with the 2 week waiting
period in testing could get fairly laborious but probably worth it.
In fact I just got 1.97.5 into stable and just today I got the auto-bug-report
that 1.97.7 is released :)
(In reply to comment #18)
> Hmm, is the gcc >= 4.5 a hard requirement?
No, it looks to be just a recommendation. We can either maintain the EPEL
version separately or use a macro to adjust it on the fly?
%if 0%{?fedora}
Requires: gcc >= 4.5
%else
Requires: gcc
%endif
???
The other option is just to remove the version since all supported fedora
releases already meet it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 753900] Review Request: abi-compliance-checker - An ABI Compliance Checker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753900 --- Comment #18 from Orion Poplawski --- Hmm, is the gcc >= 4.5 a hard requirement? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 753900] Review Request: abi-compliance-checker - An ABI Compliance Checker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753900 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||or...@cora.nwra.com --- Comment #17 from Orion Poplawski --- I'd like to see this in EPEL 6. Richard, do you have any interest in maintaining there, or shall I? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828530] New: Review Request: python-tw2-d3 - Data-driven documents for Toscawidgets2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828530 Bug ID: 828530 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: python-tw2-d3 - Data-driven documents for Toscawidgets2 Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: rb...@redhat.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-tw2-d3.spec SRPM URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-tw2-d3-0.0.8-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Data-driven documents for Toscawidgets 2 Fedora Account System Username: ralph rpmlint output: --- ~/rpmbuild » rpmlint */python-tw2-d3* python-tw2-d3.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US javascript -> java script, java-script, JavaScript 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. koji f17 - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4127309 koji el6 - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4127295 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 819134] Review Request: python-okaara - python command line user interface development library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819134 Jeff Ortel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jeff Ortel --- Changes verified. rpmlint: [jortel@localhost pulp]$ rpmlint python-okaara-1.0.19-1.fc16.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [jortel@localhost noarch]$ rpmlint python-okaara-1.0.19-1.fc16.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Package Approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828501] New: Review Request: drupal6-custom_breadcrumbs - Custom Breadcrumbs Module for Drupal6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828501 Bug ID: 828501 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: drupal6-custom_breadcrumbs - Custom Breadcrumbs Module for Drupal6 Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: ansi...@redhat.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~ansilva/drupal6-custom_breadcrumbs.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~ansilva/drupal6-custom_breadcrumbs-2.0.rc1-3.fc16.src.rpm Description: Allows administrators to set up parametrized breadcrumb trails for any node type. Fedora Account System Username: afsilva -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 807472] Review Request: libstoragemgmt - Library for storage array management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807472
--- Comment #9 from Tony Asleson ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> In general, please remember that whenever you make changes to a spec file,
> you should be incrementing Release and adding a changelog entry to describe
> the changes made to the spec. (Release resets to 1 if Version goes up). This
> workflow is why I generally do not recommend that projects autogenerate
> their spec files.
I believe I am using the change log incorrectly for the spec file. Based on
your input I should only be documenting the changes to the spec file in the
change log for the spec file not the changes that were made to the upstream
project too? If this is true then most of my spec file change logs will simply
document a version bump for upstream project.
> Can you please upload a new working SRPM somewhere for me to review?
I just spun a new release, updated tarball and SRPMS are available 0.0.8.
> (Also, you shouldn't need to have that @VERSION@ string in the Source URL,
> just use %{version} there.)
Changed.
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828458] New: Review Request: drupal6-menu_block - Menu block module for Drupal6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828458 Bug ID: 828458 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: drupal6-menu_block - Menu block module for Drupal6 Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: ansi...@redhat.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~ansilva/drupal6-menu_block.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~ansilva/drupal6-menu_block-2.4-3.fc16.src.rpm Description: Menu Block Module provides configurable blocks of menu trees starting with any level of any menu. Fedora Account System Username: afsilva -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 818297] Review Request: fedmsg - Tools for Fedora Infrastructure real-time messaging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818297 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- fedmsg-0.1.6-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fedmsg-0.1.6-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828444] New: Review Request: drupal6-context_menu_block - Context Menu Block Module for Drupal6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828444 Bug ID: 828444 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: drupal6-context_menu_block - Context Menu Block Module for Drupal6 Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: ansi...@redhat.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~ansilva/drupal6-context_menu_block.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~ansilva/drupal6-context_menu_block-3.0-2.fc16.src.rpm Description: Allows the Menu Block module to be aware of contexts provided by the Context module. Fedora Account System Username: afsilva -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828370] Review Request: drupal6-comment_bonus_api - Comment Bonus API for Drupal6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828370 --- Comment #1 from Anderson Silva --- *** Bug 828366 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828366] Review Request: drupal6-comment_bonus_api - Comment Bonus API for Drupal6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828366 Anderson Silva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed||2012-06-04 14:00:35 --- Comment #1 from Anderson Silva --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 828370 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828429] New: Review Request: drupal6-context - Context Module for Drupal6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828429 Bug ID: 828429 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: drupal6-context - Context Module for Drupal6 Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: ansi...@redhat.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~ansilva/drupal6-context.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~ansilva/drupal6-context-3.0-3.fc16.src.rpm Description: Context allows you to manage contextual conditions and reactions for different portions of your site. Fedora Account System Username: afsilva -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 822730] Review Request: laptop-mode-tools - Tools for power savings based on battery/AC status
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822730
Sergio Monteiro Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ser...@serjux.com
--- Comment #8 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I know i used the spec from dag
Good, my diff is also based from dag
> I already said that. But i made the changes
> to make it works on fedora did u try it or make any review about it?
1 - at least, put things in %install not in %build ( and leave %build empty)
2 - %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot} is deprecated
look at my diff, IMHO looks much more clean, I don't see the point of enumerate
man and don't use %doc %{_mandir}/man8/*.8*
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828370] New: Review Request: drupal6-comment_bonus_api - Comment Bonus API for Drupal6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828370 Bug ID: 828370 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: drupal6-comment_bonus_api - Comment Bonus API for Drupal6 Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: ansi...@redhat.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~ansilva/drupal6-comment_bonus_api.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~ansilva/drupal6-comment_bonus_api-1.0-2.fc16.src.rpm Description: This module enhances the standard Drupal comment module's API by providing hooks in comment_render(), which allow you to manipulate comment threads in your own way. Fedora Account System Username: afsilva -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828366] New: Review Request: drupal6-comment_bonus_api - Comment Bonus API for Drupal6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828366 Bug ID: 828366 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: drupal6-comment_bonus_api - Comment Bonus API for Drupal6 Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: ansi...@redhat.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~ansilva/drupal6-comment_bonus_api.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~ansilva/drupal6-comment_bonus_api-1.0-2.fc16.src.rpm Description: This module enhances the standard Drupal comment module's API by providing hooks in comment_render(), which allow you to manipulate comment threads in your own way. Fedora Account System Username: afsilva -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 823337] Review Request: rubygem-mixlib-shellout - mixin for running external commands
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823337
--- Comment #5 from David Nalley ---
[OK ] MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the
build produces. The output should be posted in the review.(refer to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#rpmlint)
rpmlint ./rubygem-mixlib-shellout.spec
../SRPMS/rubygem-mixlib-shellout-1.0.0-2.fc16.src.rpm
./rubygem-mixlib-shellout.spec: W: invalid-url Source1:
rubygem-mixlib-shellout-1.0.0-specs.tgz
rubygem-mixlib-shellout.src: W: invalid-url Source1:
rubygem-mixlib-shellout-1.0.0-specs.tgz
1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
[OK] MUST: The package must be named according to the
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines
[OK] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package
%{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless
your
package has an exemption. (refer to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Spec_file_name).
[OK] MUST: The package must meet the
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines.
[OK] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and
meet the http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines.
[OK] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license. (refer to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#ValidLicenseShortNames)
[OK] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in
%doc.(refer to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License
Text)
[OK] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. (refer to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#summary)
[OK] MUST: The spec file for the package '''MUST''' be legible. (refer to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Spec_Legibility)
[OK] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for
this task.
If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL for how to deal with
this.
md5sum mixlib-shellout-1.0.0.gem*
0e58aeae55b974aba9eb9bae0fc33bea mixlib-shellout-1.0.0.gem
0e58aeae55b974aba9eb9bae0fc33bea mixlib-shellout-1.0.0.gem.1
[OK] MUST: The package '''MUST''' successfully compile and build into
binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. (refer to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Architecture_Support)
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=4126851
[NA] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on
an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec
in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in
ExcludeArch
'''MUST''' have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that
the package
does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number
'''MUST''' be
placed in a comment, next to the corresponding
ExcludeArch line.
(refer to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Architecture_Build_Failures)
[OK] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in
BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2
section of the
Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as
BuildRequires is
optional. Apply common sense.
[NA] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by
using the %find_lang macro. Using
%{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.(refer to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files)
[NA] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared
library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's
default paths,
must call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
(refer to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Shared_Libraries)
[OK] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.(refer to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries)
[NA] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must
state this fact in the request for review, along with the
rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr
is
considered a blocker. (refer to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#RelocatablePackages)
[OK] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does
not create a directory that
[Bug 824628] Review Request: python-qrcode - Pure python QR Code generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824628 --- Comment #9 from Konstantin Ryabitsev --- Oh, I didn't even think to look on pypi -- I just looked in the "Files" section on github and didn't see anything there. Michel -- if you would like to maintain this package, I'm perfectly fine with that. My hands are plenty full at the moment. :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 818297] Review Request: fedmsg - Tools for Fedora Infrastructure real-time messaging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818297 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- fedmsg-0.1.6-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fedmsg-0.1.6-1.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 819180] Review Request: kdesrc-build - A tool to allow you to easily build KDE from its source repositories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819180 Gregor Tätzner changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|jrez...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #8 from Gregor Tätzner --- Spec URL: http://brummbq.fedorapeople.org/kdesrc-build.spec SRPM URL: http://brummbq.fedorapeople.org/kdesrc-build-1.15.1-2.fc16.src.rpm whoops...silly mistake -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 827804] Review Request: python-cliapp - Python framework for Unix command line programs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827804 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 819180] Review Request: kdesrc-build - A tool to allow you to easily build KDE from its source repositories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819180 --- Comment #7 from Jaroslav Reznik --- rpmlint kdesrc-build-1.15.1-1.fc16.src.rpm kdesrc-build.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US kdesvn kdesrc-build.src:80: W: macro-in-%changelog %check kdesrc-build.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://kdesrc-build.kde.org/releases/kdesrc-build-1.15.1.tar.xz HTTP Error 404: Not Found it's probably better to use standard ftp://ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/stable/kdesrc-build/1.15.1/src/ md5sum 9469a5fcc585e0f37cc295b44a0d36e1 It looks ok, just fix the sources url. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 827804] Review Request: python-cliapp - Python framework for Unix command line programs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827804 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim --- Thanks, will make those changes before importing. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-cliapp Short Description: Python framework for Unix command line programs Owners: salimma Branches: f16 f17 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828278] Review Request: rubygem-sinatra-rabbit - Ruby DSL for creating restful applications using Sinatra
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828278 Vít Ondruch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||vondr...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|vondr...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Vít Ondruch --- I'll take it for a review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 827803] Review Request: python-coverage-test-runner - Python module for enforcing code coverage completeness
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827803 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- python-coverage-test-runner-1.8-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-coverage-test-runner-1.8-1.fc16 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 827803] Review Request: python-coverage-test-runner - Python module for enforcing code coverage completeness
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827803 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- python-coverage-test-runner-1.8-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-coverage-test-runner-1.8-1.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 827803] Review Request: python-coverage-test-runner - Python module for enforcing code coverage completeness
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827803 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 815511] Review Request: python-django-lint - Analyzes Django code looking for bugs and signs of poor quality
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815511
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
OK, full review below. you'd need to bump the Obsolete: field as in the
python-django-authority I reviewed earlier today.
*Note* - I said the wrong thing about being able to use <= %{obs_ver}. This
won't work as the package you want to obsolete will have a disttag (or in the
case of python-django-lint, some really long VCS tag *plus* disttag. So for
both it's better to just use < %{obs_ver} with obs_ver being one higher than
the last released version, per the guidelines. Mea culpa!
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one supported primary architecture.
[-]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Buildroot is not present
Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL is required
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[-]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[!]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
rpmlint python-django-lint-0.13-13.20120501git194ce26.fc17.src.rpm
python-django-lint.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US py -> pt, p, y
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
rpmlint python-django-lint-0.13-13.20120501git194ce26.fc17.noarch.rpm
python-django-lint.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US py -> pt, p,
y
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
/home/michel/sources/fedora/reviews/815511/lamby-django-lint-194ce26.tar.gz :
MD5SUM this package : f83f3d02087342bd40bff63906721212
MD5SUM upstream package : f83f3d02087342bd40bff63906721212
[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[-]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[-]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
/usr/sbin.
[x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
--requires).
[x]: SHOULD Package functions as describe
[Bug 754064] Review Request: python-mimeparse - Python module providing basic functions for parsing mime-type names
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754064 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- python-mimeparse-0.1.3-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-mimeparse-0.1.3-3.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 826979] Review Request: pairs - Memory and logic stimulation game for pre-school children
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826979 --- Comment #6 from Jaroslav Reznik --- For logos, I think the solution for now is to rip the whole theme from source package, I've already contacted upstream. Preschool fixed to match description. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 826979] Review Request: pairs - Memory and logic stimulation game for pre-school children
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826979 --- Comment #5 from Lukáš Tinkl --- Yup, ignore the transaltion prob, that's void and also probably the spelling issue; what remains are the logos :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 826979] Review Request: pairs - Memory and logic stimulation game for pre-school children
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826979 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Kofler --- This package is part of KDE SC, the translations are in kde-l10n. And "pre-school" is not misspelled: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/pre-school (though "preschool" might be the better spelling, not sure). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 826979] Review Request: pairs - Memory and logic stimulation game for pre-school children
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826979 --- Comment #3 from Lukáš Tinkl --- MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. The package should have translations (PO files) included but it doesn't (upstream issue), then it should also package them using the above macro. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 826979] Review Request: pairs - Memory and logic stimulation game for pre-school children
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826979 --- Comment #2 from Lukáš Tinkl --- Possible legal issue: the package ships redhat and fedora logos! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800899] Review Request: spacewalk-pylint - Pylint configuration for spacewalk python packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800899 Miroslav Suchý changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2012-06-04 10:00:13 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 826701] Review Request: hibernate-tools - Hibernate tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826701 --- Comment #5 from Marek Goldmann --- Ah, ok, the repo is missing tags. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 826701] Review Request: hibernate-tools - Hibernate tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826701 --- Comment #4 from Marek Goldmann --- What's the reason to go to alpha? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800899] Review Request: spacewalk-pylint - Pylint configuration for spacewalk python packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800899 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- spacewalk-pylint-0.5-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spacewalk-pylint-0.5-1.fc16 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800899] Review Request: spacewalk-pylint - Pylint configuration for spacewalk python packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800899 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- spacewalk-pylint-0.5-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spacewalk-pylint-0.5-1.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800899] Review Request: spacewalk-pylint - Pylint configuration for spacewalk python packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800899 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- spacewalk-pylint-0.5-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spacewalk-pylint-0.5-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 826979] Review Request: pairs - Memory and logic stimulation game for pre-school children
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826979 --- Comment #1 from Lukáš Tinkl --- [ltinkl@goblin pairs]$ rpmlint pairs.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK [ltinkl@goblin pairs]$ rpmlint pairs-4.8.80-1.fc16.src.rpm pairs.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) pre -> per, ore, pee pairs.src: W: file-size-mismatch pairs-4.8.80.tar.xz = 2165156, ftp://ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/unstable/4.8.80/src/pairs-4.8.80.tar.xz = 2241628 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Please fix the spelling error (pre-school) and respin the tarball -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828223] Review Request: properties-maven-plugin - Properties Maven Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828223 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||826701 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 826701] Review Request: hibernate-tools - Hibernate tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826701 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||828223 --- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo --- Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/hibernate-tools/hibernate-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/hibernate-tools/hibernate-tools-3.5.0-1.fc16.src.rpm - update to 3.5.0.Alpha-SNAPSHOT -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800899] Review Request: spacewalk-pylint - Pylint configuration for spacewalk python packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800899 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- spacewalk-pylint-0.5-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spacewalk-pylint-0.5-1.el5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800899] Review Request: spacewalk-pylint - Pylint configuration for spacewalk python packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800899 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828278] Review Request: rubygem-sinatra-rabbit - Ruby DSL for creating restful applications using Sinatra
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828278 --- Comment #1 from Michal Fojtik --- * Mon Jun 04 2012 Michal Fojtik 1.0.6-2 - Added exclude tag before gem_cache - Removed the ruby dependency Spec URL: http://omicron.mifo.sk/rpms/rubygem-sinatra-rabbit.spec SRPM URL: http://omicron.mifo.sk/rpms/rubygem-sinatra-rabbit-1.0.6-2.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 826979] Review Request: pairs - Memory and logic stimulation game for pre-school children
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826979 Lukáš Tinkl changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 807472] Review Request: libstoragemgmt - Library for storage array management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807472
--- Comment #8 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
Your SRPM does not appear to reflect the spec file changes, so I took your
spec.in file and tried to build it with the 0.0.7 tarball from sourceforge, but
it fails to compile.
In general, please remember that whenever you make changes to a spec file, you
should be incrementing Release and adding a changelog entry to describe the
changes made to the spec. (Release resets to 1 if Version goes up). This
workflow is why I generally do not recommend that projects autogenerate their
spec files.
Can you please upload a new working SRPM somewhere for me to review?
(Also, you shouldn't need to have that @VERSION@ string in the Source URL, just
use %{version} there.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828278] New: Review Request: rubygem-sinatra-rabbit - Ruby DSL for creating restful applications using Sinatra
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828278 Bug ID: 828278 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: rubygem-sinatra-rabbit - Ruby DSL for creating restful applications using Sinatra Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: mfoj...@redhat.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://omicron.mifo.sk/rpms/rubygem-sinatra-rabbit.spec SRPM URL: http://omicron.mifo.sk/rpms/rubygem-sinatra-rabbit-1.0.6-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Sinatra::Rabbit is a Sinatra extensions that makes designing a REST API much easier and more fun. Rabbit maps REST resources to 'collections'. Every collection then could define CRUD and other operations to manipulate with resource. Rabbit will handle parameter validation and capability checks for you, so you can focus on the structure and design of your REST API. Fedora Account System Username: mfojtik -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828223] Review Request: properties-maven-plugin - Properties Maven Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828223 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828223] Review Request: properties-maven-plugin - Properties Maven Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828223 --- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo --- tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4125859 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 823811] Review Request: createrepo_c - C implementation of the createrepo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823811 --- Comment #13 from Tomas Mlcoch --- version 0.1.4 Spec URL: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/c/r/createrepo_c/createrepo_c.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/c/r/createrepo_c/createrepo_c-0.1.4-1.fc16.src.rpm Tarball URL: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/c/r/createrepo_c/createrepo_c-0.1.4.tar.xz Could anyone take a look at this? Thank you -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828188] Review Request: reprepro - Debian package repository producer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828188 Sebastien Caps changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|reprepro - Debian package |Review Request: reprepro - |repository producer |Debian package repository ||producer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800899] Review Request: spacewalk-pylint - Pylint configuration for spacewalk python packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800899 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 827745] Review Request: junicode-fonts - Unicode font for medievalists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827745 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) --- you may also find following links interested to read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_Fedora_GIT http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 827709] Review Request: levien-century-catalogue-fonts - century style font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827709 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) --- you may also find following links interested to read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_Fedora_GIT http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 826979] Review Request: pairs - Memory and logic stimulation game for pre-school children
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826979 Lukáš Tinkl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||lti...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lti...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828223] New: Review Request: properties-maven-plugin - Properties Maven Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828223 Bug ID: 828223 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: properties-maven-plugin - Properties Maven Plugin Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: punto...@libero.it Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/properties-maven-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/properties-maven-plugin-1.0-0.1.alpha2.fc16.src.rpm Description: The Properties Maven Plugin is here to make life a little easier when dealing with properties. It provides goals to read and write properties from files. Fedora Account System Username: gil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800899] Review Request: spacewalk-pylint - Pylint configuration for spacewalk python packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800899 Miroslav Suchý changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Miroslav Suchý --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: spacewalk-pylint Short Description: Pylint configuration for spacewalk python packages Owners: msuchy Branches: F-17, F-16, EL-5, EL-6 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 819893] Review Request: mingw-gsl - MinGW Windows port of the GNU Scientific Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819893 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- mingw-gsl-1.15-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw-gsl-1.15-2.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 819893] Review Request: mingw-gsl - MinGW Windows port of the GNU Scientific Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819893 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828188] New: reprepro - Debian package repository producer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828188 Bug ID: 828188 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: reprepro - Debian package repository producer Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: sebastien.c...@guardis.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec: http://repo.virer.net/centos/6/SPECS/reprepro.spec SRPM: http://repo.virer.net/centos/6/SRPMS/reprepro-4.10.0-1.el6.src.rpm Description: reprepro is a tool to manage a repository of Debian packages (.deb, .udeb, ...). It stores files either being injected manually or downloaded from some other repository (partially) mirrored into one pool/ hierarchy. Managed packages and files are stored in a Berkeley DB, so no database server is needed. Checking signatures of mirrored repositories and creating signatures of the generated Package indices is supported. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 827690] Review Request: ghc-sized-types - Provides indices, matrixes, and bit vectors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827690 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 827803] Review Request: python-coverage-test-runner - Python module for enforcing code coverage completeness
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827803 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 827752] Review Request: python-django-authority - A Django app for generic per-object permissions and custom permission checks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827752 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 827008] Review Request: libkcddb - A KDE CDDB retrieval library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827008 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 823167] Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Annotation - Annotate and delegate hooked OPs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823167 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821267] Review Request: R-BiocGenerics - Generic functions for Bioconductor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821267 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 819893] Review Request: mingw-gsl - MinGW Windows port of the GNU Scientific Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819893 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 827690] Review Request: ghc-sized-types - Provides indices, matrixes, and bit vectors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827690 Shakthi Kannan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RELEASE_PENDING Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Shakthi Kannan --- Thanks for the review. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ghc-sized-types Short Description: Provides indices, matrixes, and bit vectors Owners: shakthimaan Branches: f16 f17 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 816882] Review Request: plexus-pom - Root Plexus Projects pom
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816882 Stanislav Ochotnicky changed: What|Removed |Added CC||socho...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Stanislav Ochotnicky --- I have already reviewed this package which you closed as not a bug after getting git repos:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788630 I somehow don't understand this -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 827745] Review Request: junicode-fonts - Unicode font for medievalists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827745 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||panem...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) --- I can sponsor you provided you will review other package submission and/or will add few more package reviews. When you will do any informal package review, please add that review bug number in this bugzilla. This will let me know that you are doing some reviews. also please read the process of getting sponsored in packager group at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group Look for new packages at http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 827709] Review Request: levien-century-catalogue-fonts - century style font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827709 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||panem...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) --- I can sponsor you provided you will review other package submission and/or will add few more package reviews. When you will do any informal package review, please add that review bug number in this bugzilla. This will let me know that you are doing some reviews. also please read the process of getting sponsored in packager group at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group Look for new packages at http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 827008] Review Request: libkcddb - A KDE CDDB retrieval library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827008 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jaroslav Reznik --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: libkcddb Short Description: A KDE CDDB retrieval library Owners: jreznik ltinkl rdieter than kkofler Branches: f17 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 824951] Review request: aries-proxy - Apache Aries Proxy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824951 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 824951] Review request: aries-proxy - Apache Aries Proxy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824951 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- aries-proxy-0.3-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/aries-proxy-0.3-1.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 827008] Review Request: libkcddb - A KDE CDDB retrieval library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827008 --- Comment #3 from Jaroslav Reznik --- Fixed Spec URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/kdemultimedia/libkcddb.spec SRPM URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/kdemultimedia/libkcddb-4.8.80-1.fc16.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 824931] Review request: aries-quiesce - Apache Aries Quiesce
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824931 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- aries-quiesce-0.3-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/aries-quiesce-0.3-1.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 824931] Review request: aries-quiesce - Apache Aries Quiesce
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824931 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 824330] Review request: jra - Java REST Annotations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824330 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- jra-1.0-0.1.alpha4.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jra-1.0-0.1.alpha4.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 824330] Review request: jra - Java REST Annotations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824330 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 827136] Review Request: wmclock - Dockable clock applet for WindowMaker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827136 Alexey I. Froloff changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|828150 | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 827136] Review Request: wmclock - Dockable clock applet for WindowMaker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827136 Alexey I. Froloff changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2012-06-04 07:19:11 --- Comment #8 from Alexey I. Froloff --- Closing bug as NEXTRELEASE as described in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process. Xose, your report have been moved to bug #828150. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828150] Review Request: wmclock - Dockable clock applet for WindowMaker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828150 Alexey I. Froloff changed: What|Removed |Added CC|package-review@lists.fedora |ra...@raorn.name |project.org | Component|Package Review |wmclock Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ra...@raorn.name -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
