[Bug 836014] Review Request: templates_parser - template library from AWS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836014 Peter Lemenkov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||lemen...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lemen...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov --- I'll review it. No, you don't need FE-NEEDSPONSOR anymore - I sponsored you already. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828732] Review Request: feedstail - A tail-f-like utility for feeds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828732 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- feedstail-0.4.0-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/feedstail-0.4.0-3.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828732] Review Request: feedstail - A tail-f-like utility for feeds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828732 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832439] Review Request: jbosgi-resolver - Standalone OSGi Resolver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832439 Marek Goldmann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Marek Goldmann --- Thanks! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: jbosgi-resolver Short Description: Standalone OSGi Resolver Owners: goldmann Branches: f17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832439] Review Request: jbosgi-resolver - Standalone OSGi Resolver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832439 Satya Komaragiri changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Satya Komaragiri --- Package Approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832439] Review Request: jbosgi-resolver - Standalone OSGi Resolver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832439
Satya Komaragiri changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|satya.komarag...@gmail.com
QA Contact|satya.komarag...@gmail.com |extras...@fedoraproject.org
--- Comment #2 from Satya Komaragiri ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one supported primary architecture.
[x]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Buildroot is not present
Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
The -Beta2 suffix conforms to the alsa-lib pre-release example provided in
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Package_Naming_and_Versioning_Guidelines
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL is required
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[x]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[-]: MUST License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
rpmlint jbosgi-resolver-javadoc-2.0.0-0.2.Beta2.fc18.noarch.rpm
jbosgi-resolver-javadoc.noarch: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint jbosgi-resolver-2.0.0-0.2.Beta2.fc18.src.rpm
jbosgi-resolver.src: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US
jbosgi-resolver.src: W: invalid-url Source0: jbosgi-resolver-2.0.0.Beta2.tar.xz
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
rpmlint jbosgi-resolver-2.0.0-0.2.Beta2.fc18.noarch.rpm
jbosgi-resolver.noarch: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US
jbosgi-resolver.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.0.2-0.2.Beta2
['2.0.0-0.2.Beta2.fc18', '2.0.0-0.2.Beta2']
jbosgi-resolver.noarch: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
These warnings can be ignored.
[-]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
Package has no sources or they are generated by developer
[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[-]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[-]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[?]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
/usr/sbin.
[x: SHOULD Final provides and requires
[Bug 823065] Review Request: php-symfony2-Translation - Symfony2 Translation Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823065 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- php-symfony2-Translation-2.0.15-4.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-symfony2-Translation-2.0.15-4.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 823065] Review Request: php-symfony2-Translation - Symfony2 Translation Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823065 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- php-symfony2-Translation-2.0.15-4.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-symfony2-Translation-2.0.15-4.fc16 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 823065] Review Request: php-symfony2-Translation - Symfony2 Translation Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823065 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- php-symfony2-Translation-2.0.15-4.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-symfony2-Translation-2.0.15-4.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 823065] Review Request: php-symfony2-Translation - Symfony2 Translation Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823065 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 823056] Review Request: php-symfony2-Locale - Symfony2 Locale Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823056 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- php-symfony2-Locale-2.0.15-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-symfony2-Locale-2.0.15-3.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 823056] Review Request: php-symfony2-Locale - Symfony2 Locale Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823056 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- php-symfony2-Locale-2.0.15-3.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-symfony2-Locale-2.0.15-3.fc16 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 823056] Review Request: php-symfony2-Locale - Symfony2 Locale Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823056 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- php-symfony2-Locale-2.0.15-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-symfony2-Locale-2.0.15-3.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 823056] Review Request: php-symfony2-Locale - Symfony2 Locale Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823056 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 823073] Review Request: php-symfony2-HttpKernel - Symfony2 HttpKernel Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823073 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- php-symfony2-HttpKernel-2.0.15-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-symfony2-HttpKernel-2.0.15-3.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 823073] Review Request: php-symfony2-HttpKernel - Symfony2 HttpKernel Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823073 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- php-symfony2-HttpKernel-2.0.15-3.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-symfony2-HttpKernel-2.0.15-3.fc16 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 823073] Review Request: php-symfony2-HttpKernel - Symfony2 HttpKernel Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823073 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- php-symfony2-HttpKernel-2.0.15-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-symfony2-HttpKernel-2.0.15-3.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 823073] Review Request: php-symfony2-HttpKernel - Symfony2 HttpKernel Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823073 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 823065] Review Request: php-symfony2-Translation - Symfony2 Translation Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823065 Shawn Iwinski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||817303 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 817303] Review Request: php-symfony2-Yaml - Symfony2 Yaml Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817303 Shawn Iwinski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||823065 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834239] Review Request: monobristol - frontend for britsol in mono
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834239
--- Comment #9 from Orcan Ogetbil ---
Thanks, I made a full review on this.
Before I get to that let me explain my experience. The monobristol gui shows up
for me with bunch of buttons. When I click on a button a black window pops up,
stays for a few seconds, then disappears. There I get error messages in the
terminal such as
"Failed to open audio device default"
When I switch from ALSA to Jack, the Bristol synth GUI shows up, but I don't
get a sound.
Here is the review:
! Please replace "bristol" with "Bristol" in Summary too.
* A package must own all directories that it creates or require another package
that does [1]. But %{_libdir}/%{name} remains unowned. So you will need to
replace
%{_libdir}/%{name}/monoBristol.exe
by either
%dir %{_libdir}/%{name}/
%{_libdir}/%{name}/monoBristol.exe
or by simply
%{_libdir}/%{name}/
* Similarly %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/ remains unowned. But this directory
already depends on a standard package. So we will need to
Requires: hicolor-icon-theme
! Not really necessary in this case, but in my opinion, it would be nice to
explain what each patch does with a short comment.
* We got a new rpmlint
monobristol.x86_64: W: percent-in-%post
Please replace the %>/dev/null with &>/dev/null
* The source code does not specify a license. There is a COPYING file for GPLv3
and the README file says the software is GPL. In particular [2] says
A GPL or LGPL licensed package that lacks any statement of what version that
it's licensed under in the source code/program output/accompanying docs is
technically licensed under *any* version of the GPL or LGPL, not just the
version in whatever COPYING file they include.
Therefore we shall set
License: GPL+
Yet it is best to confirm this with upstream.
[1]
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership
[2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830125] Review Request: jbosgi-spi - JBossOSGi SPI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830125 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-06-27 23:55:56 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- jbosgi-spi-3.0.1-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830159] Review Request: ghc-smallcheck - A testing library to verify properties of test cases
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830159 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-smallcheck-0.6.1-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821220] cxxtools - A collection of general-purpose C++ classes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821220 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- cxxtools-2.1.1-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790667] Review Request: msgpack - Binary-based efficient object serialization library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790667 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- msgpack-0.5.7-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 824334] Review Request: libkolabxml - Kolab XML Format library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824334 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- libkolabxml-0.6.0-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 823047] Review Request: php-symfony2-DomCrawler - Symfony2 DomCrawler Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823047 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- php-symfony2-DomCrawler-2.0.15-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 825517] Review Request: egtk - The eGTK (elementary GTK) themes for GTK+2, GTK+3, Metacity and Xfwm4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825517 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- egtk-3.1-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830750] Review Request: jbosgi-resolver1 - Standalone OSGi Resolver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830750 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- jbosgi-resolver1-1.0.13-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 826955] Review Request: apache-commons-chain - An implementation of the GoF Chain of Responsibility pattern
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826955 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-06-27 23:39:11 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- apache-commons-chain-1.2-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 829402] Review Request: jbosgi-vfs - JBoss OSGi Virtual File System
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829402 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-06-27 23:35:10 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- jbosgi-vfs-1.1.2-0.3.CR1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830677] Review Request: jbosgi-deployment - JBoss OSGi Deployment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830677 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- jbosgi-deployment-1.0.12-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821712] Review Request: apache-commons-vfs - Commons Virtual File System
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821712 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-06-27 23:33:26 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- apache-commons-vfs-2.0-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 810059] Review request: opencl-utils - Useful OpenCL tools and utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810059 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-06-27 23:31:23 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System --- opencl-utils-0-7.svn16.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821220] cxxtools - A collection of general-purpose C++ classes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821220 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- cxxtools-2.1.1-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830278] Review Request: clojure-maven-plugin - Clojure plugin for Maven
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830278 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- clojure-maven-plugin-1.3.10-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 818297] Review Request: fedmsg - Tools for Fedora Infrastructure real-time messaging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818297 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-06-27 23:24:27 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System --- fedmsg-0.2.0-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 819237] Review Request: vdr-screenshot - Extended screenshot plugin for VDR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819237 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- vdr-screenshot-0.0.14-4.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 833004] Review Request: pyp2rpm - Convert Python packages to RPM SPECFILES
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833004 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-06-27 23:24:02 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- pyp2rpm-0.5.1-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 820344] Review Request: apache-commons-javaflow - Commons Javaflow
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820344 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- apache-commons-javaflow-1.0-0.1.20120509SNAPSHOT.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790667] Review Request: msgpack - Binary-based efficient object serialization library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790667 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- msgpack-0.5.7-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 827917] Review Request: eclipse-wtp-webservices - Tools for developing and interacting with Java Web services
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827917 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- eclipse-wtp-webservices-3.4.0-0.6.20120617cvs.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830159] Review Request: ghc-smallcheck - A testing library to verify properties of test cases
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830159 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-06-27 23:22:01 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-smallcheck-0.6.1-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 823047] Review Request: php-symfony2-DomCrawler - Symfony2 DomCrawler Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823047 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-06-27 23:21:48 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- php-symfony2-DomCrawler-2.0.15-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830763] Review Request: jbosgi-framework - JBoss OSGi Core Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830763 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- jbosgi-framework-1.1.8-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 833853] Review Request: libkolab - Kolab Format Handler library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833853
--- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter ---
No worries, the .spec only says 5%{?dist}, so that's just part of kolab's
custom dist tag
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 833204] Review Request: python-pyramid-tm - Allows pyramid requests to join the active transaction
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833204 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834069] Review Request: Clean - The Clean language compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834069
--- Comment #6 from Paul Wouters ---
Note that when writing about software people often capitalize it. I do the same
for Openswan for example. But when people install packages, they most often
assume or look for lovercased package names, and using a capital is just making
it harder for people to find the package.
Some minor things:
warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib64/Clean
warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/doc/Clean
Related: You should not need to use the %{_defaultdocdir}. By adding things
using %doc it should appear at the proper place. It will then also properly
version the doc dir as /usr/share/doc/Clean-2.4-2/ So just do:
%doc doc/*
Clean.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/clm
Guess that's unavoidable now with the debuginfo not really working for clean
package. So, OK.
Clean.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/Clean/CleanLangRep/CleanRep.2.2.css
Can you convert that using tr or dos2unix?
# Patch clm to use the /bin directory
Can you patch it for /usr/bin since /bin is a symlink to /usr/bin/
With these, I'll approve the package, though I still have a strong preference
for a package name without a capital C.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834069] Review Request: Clean - The Clean language compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834069
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
Thanks for reviewing.
I have read your comments, and fixed as many as possible.
New SPEC: http://puiterwijk.fedorapeople.org/packages/Clean/Clean-2.spec
New SRPMS:
http://puiterwijk.fedorapeople.org/packages/Clean/Clean-2.4-2.fc17.src.rpm
New Koji link: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4203212
First, for the naming, I have decided to stay with Clean, because that is the
name upstream also uses (even in the middle of a sentence, they write it with
capital C: "Learn more about the Clean language by ...").
And according to the Naming Guidelines, you should keep the case as specified
by upstream.
The remove_tmp_files_linux script is only deleting a few object files which
were built in previous passes, it does not do anything considered dangerous.
I have modified it so that it will use rm -f, to evade the warnings.
I have versioned the build directory.
Compilation during installation has been fixed.
This was needed because clm compiles StdEnv for that specific machine.
I have set ExclusiveArch, since this version is only available on x86 and
x86_64.
The BuildRequire's have been removed.
I have changed CFLAGS= into CFLAGS+= and added the nessecary arguments to make.
rm -rf in %install has been removed.
Clean/doc now gets packaged into defaultdocdir/Clean
The attributes actually are needed, because the default of the Clean compiler
is 711.
The rpmlint messages are explained in the SPEC file now
# Known errors of RPMLINT:
# Name-repeated-in-summary: This is because the name of the language is the
same as that of the compiler
# Executable-stack: the Clean runtime system is built to use this, so this
cannot be changed without major overhauling of the Clean compiler itself
# Empty files (_startup.dcl, _startupTrace.dcl, _startupProfile.dcl,
_system.dcl, _library.dcl): these must be available while running the compiler
# Wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding: this has been requested upstream
# %ifarch-applied-patch: because the archives for 32-bit and 64-bit differ in
more then the bootstrapped files, this has to be done (some files have the same
name, but have different contents)
I have removed the debuginfo package option, because the Clean linker strips
all debug info, without any option to re-enable it.
I have added the %{?dist} tag.
I have used %{name} in the patchX names, for sourceX this is not possible,
because the archive names are with small letters.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 833204] Review Request: python-pyramid-tm - Allows pyramid requests to join the active transaction
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833204 Ross Delinger changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Ross Delinger --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-pyramid-tm Short Description: Allows pyramid requests to join the active transaction Owners: rossdylan Branches: f17 el6 InitialCC: rossdylan -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 833154] Review Request: eclipse-wtp-jeetools - Frameworks and tools for Eclipse, focused on the development of J2EE artifacts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833154 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- eclipse-wtp-jeetools-3.4.0-0.2.20120618cvs.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/eclipse-wtp-jeetools-3.4.0-0.2.20120618cvs.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 833154] Review Request: eclipse-wtp-jeetools - Frameworks and tools for Eclipse, focused on the development of J2EE artifacts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833154 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 833853] Review Request: libkolab - Kolab Format Handler library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833853 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Kofler --- To be clear, 5.fc17.kolab_3.0 is not a valid Release tag for a prerelease snapshot for several reasons: * The tag before the disttag must be of the form 0.n where n is an integer, e.g. "0.5" rather than just "5". * "kolab_3.0" is not a valid snapshot tag, should be of the form "20120627git" or "20120627git54d11d06". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 833204] Review Request: python-pyramid-tm - Allows pyramid requests to join the active transaction
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833204 Ralph Bean changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Ralph Bean --- Looks good. Approved! For future reference, you should bump the revision number in your spec file and create a new entry in the changelog for each iteration of the review. That helps the reviewer understand just what you changed, item-by-item. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 826563] Review Request: fuelmanager - keep track of your fuel mileage and consumption
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826563 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- fuelmanager-0.3.7-3.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fuelmanager-0.3.7-3.fc16 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 826563] Review Request: fuelmanager - keep track of your fuel mileage and consumption
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826563 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- fuelmanager-0.3.7-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fuelmanager-0.3.7-3.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 833395] Review Request: ginfo - Service Discovery Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833395 Andrew Elwell changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|andrew.elw...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 833395] Review Request: ginfo - Service Discovery Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833395 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Elwell --- Hi Laurence, Working on the package review for this - The description is far too terse. It doesn't provide me with enough info to work out *what* I can use this package for -- for example there's now way I'd have worked out my use case of iterating through the information system to get hostnames could have been assisted by this application. Can you submit an expanded description in the spec? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834747] Review Request: gps - IDE for C and Ada
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834747 Julian Leyh changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||836014 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 810676] Review Request: aws - Ada Web Server (Web framework for Ada)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810676 Julian Leyh changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||836014 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 836014] Review Request: templates_parser - template library from AWS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836014 Julian Leyh changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||834747, 810676 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 836014] Review Request: templates_parser - template library from AWS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836014 Julian Leyh changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||712332 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 836014] New: Review Request: templates_parser - template library from AWS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836014 Bug ID: 836014 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: templates_parser - template library from AWS Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: jul...@vgai.de Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://vgai.de/fedora/2012-06-27/templates_parser.spec SRPM URL: http://vgai.de/fedora/2012-06-27/templates_parser-11.6.0-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: template library from AWS, used by AWS and GPS Fedora Account System Username: oenone This library is used by two other projects, see #834747 and #810676 - how should i link them to this request? Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4201949 rpmlint output: templates_parser.x86_64: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US templates_parser.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/lib64/templates_parser/libtemplates_parser.so templates_parser.x86_64: W: no-documentation templates_parser-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/data/builder/rpmbuild/BUILD/templates_parser-11.6.0/.build templates_parser-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/data/builder/rpmbuild/BUILD/templates_parser-11.6.0/.build templates_parser-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources templates_parser-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings. executable-stack is normal for Ada packages, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ada#Rpmlint_and_Ada_packages how can i fix the error for debuginfo subpackage? Another question: Should GMGPL be added to the accepted licenses? It basically is a GPLv2+ with linking exception. Or is "GPLv2+ with exceptions" good enough? I paused fixing my gps package (#834747) for this. Do I still need to add FE-NEEDSPONSOR? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 835432] Review Request: python-pycxx - Write Python extensions in C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835432 --- Comment #18 from Matthias Runge --- (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #16) > > some drive by comments: > > > > - imho, there's no need for obsoletes, there's no version to obsolete. > > I did some searching and it doesn't exist in Fedora but it does on EL5. > Perhaps it should be conditionalized if he intends to support EPEL? Richard, good catch! If this was mine, I'd drop support for EL5. A pretty spec would use a contitionalized obsolete, as Richard proposed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828993] Review Request: l3afpad - Simple text editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828993 Christoph Wickert changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: l3afpad - |l3afpad-0.8.18.1.9-1 - Text |Simple text editor |Editor | Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 783294] Review Request: picolisp - Lisp Interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783294 Michael Shigorin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||shigo...@gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Michael Shigorin --- (In reply to comment #4) > Patch for fixing the empty debuginfo package issue Pushing $(RPM_OPT_FLAGS) inside Cygwin ifdef looks spectacular :) Kalpa, you might have a look at Debian patches either, and there's 3.1.0 by now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 835432] Review Request: python-pycxx - Write Python extensions in C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835432
--- Comment #17 from Richard Shaw ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> some drive by comments:
>
> - imho, there's no need for obsoletes, there's no version to obsolete.
I did some searching and it doesn't exist in Fedora but it does on EL5. Perhaps
it should be conditionalized if he intends to support EPEL?
> - buildrequires: python-devel should be python2-devel, or something like:
> BuildRequires: python2-devel
> %if 0%{?with_python3}
> BuildRequires: python3-devel
> %endif # if with_python3
Yup, this will need to be fixed. I find it interesting though that the python
template in rpmdev-newspec uses just python-devel.
(In reply to comment #15)
> There's a new specfile and RPM uploaded to the same links.
>
> Updates:
> - Install a pkg-config PyCXX.pc file
> - Own /usr/share/python2.7/
I'm concerned about this one. I'm not sure anything but python should own a
directly like that. Perhaps /usr/src was a good idea?
> This takes care of all the issues I'm aware of. Anyone up for a formal
> review?
Wish I could, we still need to find you a sponsor. If you have time I'm sure
one of the links from comment 3 will tell you to do informal review on other
review requests. This would probably be the fastest route. If you can do a few
and come back here and reference them that would help. Also, an alternative (or
in addition to) might be to package something off the wish list that someone
really wants.
In fact, I wonder if it would be a good idea to write to the devel list and
mention you need sponsoring and are willing to package something a sponsor
needs...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828370] Review Request: drupal6-comment_bonus_api - Comment Bonus API for Drupal6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828370 --- Comment #5 from Anderson Silva --- Updated: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~ansilva/drupal6-comment_bonus_api.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~ansilva/drupal6-comment_bonus_api-1.0-4.fc16.src.rpm Thanks, AS -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 835686] Review Request: mingw-wine-mono - Mono library required for Wine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835686 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Bierfert --- http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/mingw-wine-mono.spec http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/mingw-wine-mono-0.0.4-5.fc17.src.rpm https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4201110 * Wed Jun 27 2012 Andreas Bierfert - 0.0.4-5 - add conditional so package builds on x86-64 builders as well -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 827917] Review Request: eclipse-wtp-webservices - Tools for developing and interacting with Java Web services
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827917 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- eclipse-wtp-webservices-3.4.0-0.6.20120617cvs.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/eclipse-wtp-webservices-3.4.0-0.6.20120617cvs.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 827917] Review Request: eclipse-wtp-webservices - Tools for developing and interacting with Java Web services
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827917 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832420] Review Request: felix-osgi-obr-resolver - Apache Felix Resolver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832420 Marek Goldmann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830750] Review Request: jbosgi-resolver1 - Standalone OSGi Resolver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830750 Marek Goldmann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830677] Review Request: jbosgi-deployment - JBoss OSGi Deployment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830677 Marek Goldmann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830763] Review Request: jbosgi-framework - JBoss OSGi Core Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830763 Marek Goldmann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830763] Review Request: jbosgi-framework - JBoss OSGi Core Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830763 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- jbosgi-framework-1.1.8-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jbosgi-framework-1.1.8-3.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830763] Review Request: jbosgi-framework - JBoss OSGi Core Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830763 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830677] Review Request: jbosgi-deployment - JBoss OSGi Deployment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830677 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- jbosgi-deployment-1.0.12-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jbosgi-deployment-1.0.12-2.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830677] Review Request: jbosgi-deployment - JBoss OSGi Deployment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830677 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 835064] Review Request: perl-Devel-DProf - Deprecated Perl code profiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835064 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar --- Thanks for testing. Updated package is on the same address. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 833204] Review Request: python-pyramid-tm - Allows pyramid requests to join the active transaction
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833204 --- Comment #7 from Ross Delinger --- python-pyramid is now at version 1.2.7 which unblocks this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 835686] Review Request: mingw-wine-mono - Mono library required for Wine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835686 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Bierfert --- Yes this is intentional. I'd prefer a setup like wine-gecko but this is what wine currently supports. Here is the quote from: http://wiki.winehq.org/Mono "Unlike gecko, there is only one package containing the code for both x86 and x86_64, as most of the code does not depend on the architecture." -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 835716] Review Request: jboss-common-logging-spi - JBoss Logging Programming Interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835716 Gerard Ryan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-06-27 10:49:50 --- Comment #2 from Gerard Ryan --- jboss-logging should be used instead of this. Closing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828879] Review Request: system-storage-manager - A single tool to manage your storage
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828879 Eric Sandeen changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Eric Sandeen --- Thanks for the updates Lukas, looks good to me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 835064] Review Request: perl-Devel-DProf - Deprecated Perl code profiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835064 --- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova --- I tried to build the rpm on koji with perl 5.16, but it failed. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4200689 DProf.c:852:13: error: static declaration of 'XS_Devel__DProf_END' follows non-static declaration DProf.xs:107:6: note: previous declaration of 'XS_Devel__DProf_END' was here make: *** [DProf.o] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.GtpqcN (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.GtpqcN (%build) Child return code was: 1 EXCEPTION: Command failed. See logs for output. It is reported bug (https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=70629). Po The BR perl(Test::More) is missing (t/release-pod-syntax.t line 8) Please fix the build error and BR and provides new spec file. Package NOT approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 835910] New: Review Request: osgi-core - OSGi Core Interfaces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835910 Bug ID: 835910 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: osgi-core - OSGi Core Interfaces Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: punto...@libero.it Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/osgi-core.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/osgi-core-5.0.0-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: OSGi Service Platform Release 5 Version 5.0, Core Interfaces and Classes for use in compiling bundles. Fedora Account System Username: gil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828429] Review Request: drupal6-context - Context Module for Drupal6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828429 Wesley Hearn changed: What|Removed |Added CC||whe...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|whe...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 835544] Review Request: perl-Pod-Markdown - Convert POD to Markdown
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835544 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2012-06-27 10:07:32 --- Comment #6 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Thank you for the review and the repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 835804] Review Request: perl-Module-Install-ReadmeMarkdownFromPod - Create README.mkdn from POD
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835804 Bug 835804 depends on bug 835544, which changed state. Bug 835544 Summary: Review Request: perl-Pod-Markdown - Convert POD to Markdown https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835544 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 835064] Review Request: perl-Devel-DProf - Deprecated Perl code profiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835064 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jples...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jples...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 833853] Review Request: libkolab - Kolab Format Handler library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833853 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||835904 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 835596] Review Request: perl-Data-Flow - Perl extension for simple-minded recipe-controlled build of data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835596 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Data-Flow-1.02-1.fc18 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2012-06-27 09:33:25 --- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar --- Thank you for the review and the repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 835028] Review Request: perl-pod2pdf - Converts Pod to PDF format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835028 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2012-06-27 09:27:12 --- Comment #7 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Thank you for the review and the repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 835062] Review Request: perl-Module-Install-ReadmeFromPod - Module::Install extension to automatically convert POD to a README
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835062 Bug 835062 depends on bug 835028, which changed state. Bug 835028 Summary: Review Request: perl-pod2pdf - Converts Pod to PDF format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835028 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 835596] Review Request: perl-Data-Flow - Perl extension for simple-minded recipe-controlled build of data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835596 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 833853] Review Request: libkolab - Kolab Format Handler library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833853 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter --- Nice, so one last thing I forgot to mention, if you *are* going forward with using snapshots, please do follow: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages I'll leave that to you to address prior to building any official packages. APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 835596] Review Request: perl-Data-Flow - Perl extension for simple-minded recipe-controlled build of data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835596 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 835544] Review Request: perl-Pod-Markdown - Convert POD to Markdown
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835544 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 835028] Review Request: perl-pod2pdf - Converts Pod to PDF format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835028 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832810] Review Request: perl-Method-Signatures - Method and function declarations with signatures and no source filter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832810 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
