[Bug 840551] Review Request: sugar-kuku - arithmetic education game
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 840437] Review Request: sugar-xoeditor - editor for xo icon colors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840437 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 840425] Review Request: sugar-colordeducto - learning activity to improve students skills to deducing logic and learning colors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840425 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 841239] Review Request: sugar-story - an activity that uses images to prompt the learner to tell stories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841239 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 841483] New: Review Request: kde-plasma-mail-checker - Plasmoid for checking a new messages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841483 Bug ID: 841483 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: kde-plasma-mail-checker - Plasmoid for checking a new messages Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: kaperan...@gmail.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/F1ash/plasmaMailChecker/simple/kde-plasma-mail-checker.spec SRPM URL: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8621/4248621/kde-plasma-mail-checker-1.7.30-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Plasmoid should periodic check for new messages in configured accounts. Supported protocols: POP3/POP3S/IMAP4/IMAP4S + IMAP4_IDLE. Passwords for accounts stored in encrypted container. Plasmoid use KDE-notification for events about new mail. Support Akonadi (mimeType : message/rfc822) resources monitoring (getting new mail). Fedora Account System Username: f1ash Addition: First package; need sponsor; succesful build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4248621 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 841483] Review Request: kde-plasma-mail-checker - Plasmoid for checking a new messages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841483 Fl@sh kaperan...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 841483] Review Request: kde-plasma-mail-checker - Plasmoid for checking a new messages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841483
--- Comment #1 from Vasiliy Glazov vasc...@gmail.com ---
Hi, Fl@sh.
1. Remove BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u}
-n)
2. Remove %defattr(-,root,root) in %files section.
3. Use %_kde4_appsdir instead of %{_datadir}/kde4/apps
Also remove string %dir %{_datadir}/kde4/apps/plasma/plasmoids/%{name}
and remove /* at the end of previous string.
4. Remove %clean section.
5. Remove dot from the end os Summary.
6. Should add some documentation and license file
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 771252] Review Request: cinnamon - Window management and application launching for GNOME
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252 --- Comment #117 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com --- (In reply to comment #116) Leigh, Fair enough. But how would I install on f17 if I need a version of muffin that is not yet in the repo? It should be in the stable repo soon https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/muffin-1.0.4-0.4.gitfcea2f1.fc17 Dan Here's the updated srpm + spec * Thu Jul 19 2012 Leigh Scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com - 1.4.1-0.5.git7959517 - Correct spelling mistake - Add descriptions for patches SPEC: http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/cinnamon/12/cinnamon.spec SRPM: http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/cinnamon/12/cinnamon-1.4.1-0.5.git7959517.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832816] Review Request: mckoi - Open Source Java SQL Database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832816 --- Comment #7 from jiri vanek jva...@redhat.com --- Thanx for clarifications! imho - In My (Honest) Opinion ... sorry for confusion Three concerns remains: testing - I would recommend to run tests after build, and with grep somehow ensure that they passed. If you do not want to bother with this I will not insists, but it is good protection against pack something what is not working in case that your package will be inherited by someone else in some dark future. mckoi is packaged as library and not as db, for now i haven't interest to add a launcher script Ah that is an pitty :(( But ok. a) The not existence of src and demo package is inttional? (means *1) - imho it is more then worthy yes Hmm.. Why that? Demo package .. ok.. as yo wish, but source package for java package is extremely useful! Probably the best what you can do is jar all .java in src directory and provide it as src jar with similar version and linking as non src one (maybe you do not need to create separate package and just include in your current rpm. What do you think? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 841335] Review Request: gnusim8085 - A 8085 Simulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841335
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com ---
Final look:
$ rpmlint gnusim8085-1.3.7-2.fc17.x86_64.rpm
gnusim8085.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/gnusim8085-1.3.7/COPYING
Ha, that's what happens when one touches packages. :-)
$ rpmls -p gnusim8085-1.3.7-2.fc17.x86_64.rpm
lists a directory that doesn't contain any files (have missed that before):
/usr/share/pixmaps/gnusim8085
-URL: http://gnusim8085.org/
+URL: http://www.gnusim8085.org/
Maybe, maybe not. ;) The latter here redirects to http://gnusim8085.org/
-%{_datadir}/doc/%{name}*
+%{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}/*
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories
= %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}/
As a second thought, a little bit safer than that path for the doc files would
be
%configure --docdir %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}
and
%{_datadir}/doc/%{name}/
in the files list. That path doesn't conflict with using %doc to add files.
However, if any %doc files were to be added manually, you would end up with two
doc directories, %{_datadir}/doc/%{name} and
%{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}, so that would be a different pitfall.
Adding a comment that using %doc to add files manually bears a risk could be
helpful, too.
No minor update needed for this review. These are small issues you can fix more
conveniently within Fedora package git.
APPROVED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 839706] Review Request: perl-Time-Clock - Twenty-four hour clock object with nanosecond precision
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839706 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Time-Clock-1.02-4.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 823889] Review Request: openjpa - Java Persistence 2.0 API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823889 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- openjpa-2.2.0-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 823236] Review Request: sugar-recall - A series of memory games
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823236 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- sugar-recall-2-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 803558] Review Request: ehcache-core - Easy Hibernate Cache
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803558 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ehcache-core-2.6.0-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 836404] Review Request: jboss-reflect - JBoss Reflection
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836404 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- jboss-reflect-2.0.2-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 811849] Review Request: python-cdb - Constant database library adapted as a python extension module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811849 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-07-19 04:58:03 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-cdb-0.34-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658754] Review Request: CUBRID - a very fast and reliable open source SQL database server.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658754 --- Comment #19 from Esen Sagynov esen.sagy...@nhn.com --- Cristian, hello! What's the next step? What should we do now? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 839701] Review Request: perl-SQL-ReservedWords - Determine if words are reserved by ANSI/ISO SQL standard.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839701 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-SQL-ReservedWords-0.7-4.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 823234] Review Request: sugar-nutrition - A collection of nutrition games for sugar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823234 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- sugar-nutrition-4-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 809540] Review Request: eclipselink - Eclipse Persistence Services Project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809540 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- eclipselink-2.3.2-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 741529] Review Request: python-futures - Backport of the concurrent.futures package from Python 3.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741529 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-futures-2.1.2-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 819953] Review Request: lightdm - Lightweight Display Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819953 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- lightdm-gtk-1.1.6-3.fc16, lightdm-kde-0.1.1-6.fc16, lightdm-1.2.2-15.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 826563] Review Request: fuelmanager - keep track of your fuel mileage and consumption
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826563 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- fuelmanager-0.3.7-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 831228] Review Request: pegdown - Java library for Markdown processing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831228 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- pegdown-1.1.0-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 810010] Review Request: genders - file based database for cluster managment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810010 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- genders-1.18-6.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 817311] Review Request: miniupnpc - Library and tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817311 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- miniupnpc-1.6-6.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828530] Review Request: python-tw2-d3 - Data-driven documents for Toscawidgets2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828530 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-tw2-d3-0.0.8-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 823847] Review Request: simple-jndi - A JNDI implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823847 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- simple-jndi-0.11.4.1-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 839851] Review Request: mate-common -- mate common build files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-07-19 05:09:35 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- mate-common-1.4.0-5.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 841335] Review Request: gnusim8085 - A 8085 Simulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841335
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@gmail.com ---
Thank you very much for your comments, I will fix them and go through
everything again before pushing the update.
I think that /usr/share/doc/%{name}-%{version} is safer, because the double dir
situation.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 831209] Review Request: parboiled - Java/Scala library providing parsing of input text based on PEGs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831209 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- parboiled-1.0.2-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 839851] Review Request: mate-common -- mate common build files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- mate-common-1.4.0-5.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 841335] Review Request: gnusim8085 - A 8085 Simulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841335 Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@gmail.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: gnusim8085 Short Description: Graphical simulator for 8085 assembly language Owners: puiterwijk Branches: el5 el6 f16 f17 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 841335] Review Request: gnusim8085 - Graphical simulator for 8085 assembly language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841335 Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: gnusim8085 |Review Request: gnusim8085 |- A 8085 Simulator |- Graphical simulator for ||8085 assembly language -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 840149] Tracker for MATE packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840149 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||MATE-DE-tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832816] Review Request: mckoi - Open Source Java SQL Database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832816 --- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/mckoi/1/mckoi.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/mckoi/1/mckoi-1.0.4-2.fc16.src.rpm - Added demos package -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834552] Review Request: pdfmod - A simple application for modifying PDF documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834552
--- Comment #4 from Ismael Olea ism...@olea.org ---
(In reply to comment #2)
pdfmod.src:66: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package)
%{_libdir}/%{name}/
- not sure how this is to handle
this in a guidelines exception:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Mono#rpmlint_and_mono_packages
pdfmod.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.9.1-3 ['0.9.1-2.fc17',
'0.9.1-2']
- easy fix
ups
pdfmod.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/lib/pdfmod/poppler-sharp.dll.config
- remove x bit!?
done
Spec URL: http://olea.org/tmp/pdfmod/pdfmod.spec
SRPM URL: http://olea.org/tmp/pdfmod/pdfmod-0.9.1-4.fc17.src.rpm
(In reply to comment #3)
and have you asked for this problem upstream?
#stupid dep needed at configuring; maybe an autoconf induced bug?:
BuildRequires:gcc
no. I pretended to fix and send the patch but failed with it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834548] Review Request: hyena - Hyena is a library of GUI and non-GUI C# code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834548 Ismael Olea ism...@olea.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2012-07-19 06:24:49 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834552] Review Request: pdfmod - A simple application for modifying PDF documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834552 Bug 834552 depends on bug 834551, which changed state. Bug 834551 Summary: Review Request: poppler-sharp C sharp Bindings for Poppler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834551 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834552] Review Request: pdfmod - A simple application for modifying PDF documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834552 Bug 834552 depends on bug 834548, which changed state. Bug 834548 Summary: Review Request: hyena - Hyena is a library of GUI and non-GUI C# code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834548 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834551] Review Request: poppler-sharp C sharp Bindings for Poppler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834551 Ismael Olea ism...@olea.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2012-07-19 06:24:51 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 839395] Review Request: rubygem-stickshift-controller - Rails engine for the OpenShift Broker API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839395 --- Comment #5 from David Cameron d.g.came...@gmail.com --- It looks like problems 1 and 3 are fixed, but the changelog version warning is still there, and the spec file inside the new srpm is different from the link in comment 3 - the Source0 tag gives a warning rubygem-stickshift-controller.src: W: invalid-url Source0: rubygem-stickshift-controller-git-73.1915eff.tar.gz (the URL is ok in the standalone spec). The new entries in the changelog also throw up new warnings: rubygem-stickshift-controller.src:70: W: macro-in-%changelog %gemname rubygem-stickshift-controller.src:70: W: macro-in-%changelog %gem_name rubygem-stickshift-controller.src:70: W: macro-in-%changelog %geminstdir I guess you want to escape those with %%. As for the unexpanded macro warnings, this seems to be a feature related to ruby packages and they are safe to ignore. One more thing - the LICENSE file should be included in %doc http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 822959] Review Request: nitrotasks - Super awesome task management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822959 Matthieu Saulnier casper.le.fan...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||casper.le.fan...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Matthieu Saulnier casper.le.fan...@gmail.com --- Hello, the 1.2.5 version is not the latest version of nitrotasks, please update your package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834552] Review Request: pdfmod - A simple application for modifying PDF documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834552
Paul Lange pala...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pala...@gmx.de
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Paul Lange pala...@gmx.de ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Rpmlint output:
pdfmod.noarch: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found es - OK, no spanish translations
on my side
pdfmod.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib - OK, mono caused
pdfmod.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pdfmod - OK, not provided
pdfmod.src:12: W: macro-in-comment %3AApps - OK, just an uri
pdfmod.src:67: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package)
%{_libdir}/%{name}/ - OK, mono caused
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1].
[x] Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
[x] Buildroot definition is not present
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines[3,4].
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[-] All independent sub-packages have license of their own
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[paul@laptop SOURCES]$ sha256sum pdfmod-0.9.1.tar.gz.package
4b69d953a3d5b457c82af79a2c098fce345c524ecc72a6ebb926b06bb79949c0
pdfmod-0.9.1.tar.gz.package
[paul@laptop SOURCES]$ sha256sum pdfmod-0.9.1.tar.gz
4b69d953a3d5b457c82af79a2c098fce345c524ecc72a6ebb926b06bb79949c0
pdfmod-0.9.1.tar.gz
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5].
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates or must require other
packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] File sections do not contain %defattr(-,root,root,-) unless changed with
good reason
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore)
[x] Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
mixing)
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x] Package uses %global not %define
[x] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
=== Final Notes ===
1. I think it would be good to file the bug with gcc, even without a solution.
*** APPROVED ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834552] Review Request: pdfmod - A simple application for modifying PDF documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834552 Ismael Olea ism...@olea.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #6 from Ismael Olea ism...@olea.org --- thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834552] Review Request: pdfmod - A simple application for modifying PDF documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834552 Ismael Olea ism...@olea.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Ismael Olea ism...@olea.org --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: pdfmod Short Description: A simple application for modifying PDF documents Owners: olea Branches: devel f17 f16 InitialCC: ARGG! I removed the fedora-review+ tag from pala...@gmx.de, silly me! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834552] Review Request: pdfmod - A simple application for modifying PDF documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834552 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||limburg...@gmail.com Flags|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Paul, please re-set fedora-review, and then Ismael, please re-set fedora-cvs. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 823171] Review Request: erlang-eleveldb - Erlang LevelDB API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823171
Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com ---
This package is APPROVED. Remove EPEL macros/tags if not required,
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
C/C++
[ ]: MUST Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if
present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in non-devel package (fix or explain):erlang-
eleveldb-1.1.0-1.fc18.x86_64.rpm :
/usr/lib64/erlang/lib/eleveldb-1.1.0/priv/eleveldb.so
Generic
[x]: EXTRA Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: EXTRA Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one supported primary architecture.
[x]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[!]: MUST Buildroot is not present
Note: Buildroot is not needed unless packager plans to package for EPEL5
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[!]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: Clean is needed only if supporting EPEL
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[!]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
Note: defattr() present in %files section. This is OK if packaging
for EPEL5. Otherwise not needed
[x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: MUST Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: MUST Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[!]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf is only needed if supporting EPEL5
[-]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[-]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
Apache (v2.0) For detailed output of licensecheck see file:
/home/bsjones/rpmbuild/SRPMS/erlang-eleveldb/licensecheck.txt
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
Note: Using both %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: MUST Package is named using only allowed ascii characters.
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
Note: Package contains no Conflicts: tag(s)
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Package is not relocatable.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: MUST Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[-]: MUST Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[-]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
/usr/sbin.
[x]: SHOULD Final
[Bug 838423] Review Request: zukiwi - Themes for GTK+2, GTK+3, Metacity and GNOME Shell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838423 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 839742] Review Request: perl-Rose-Object - Simple object base class
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839742 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 823171] Review Request: erlang-eleveldb - Erlang LevelDB API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823171 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com --- Thanks! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: erlang-eleveldb Short Description: Erlang LevelDB API Owners: peter Branches: f17 el6 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 839921] Review Request: perl-SNMP-Simple - Shortcuts for SNMP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839921 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 841089] Review Request: rubygem-sprockets - Rack-based asset packaging system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841089 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 823171] Review Request: erlang-eleveldb - Erlang LevelDB API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823171 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 841335] Review Request: gnusim8085 - Graphical simulator for 8085 assembly language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841335 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Unretired devel, please file an SCM Package Change request for f17 and f16 branches. EL-5 and EL-6 already exist and are owned by sherry151 and chitlesh, you can request co-maintainership or start the non-responsive maintainer process if applicable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 839527] Review Request: rtirq - realtime IRQ threading
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839527 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||lemen...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lemen...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com --- I'll review it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834552] Review Request: pdfmod - A simple application for modifying PDF documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834552 Paul Lange pala...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834552] Review Request: pdfmod - A simple application for modifying PDF documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834552 --- Comment #9 from Paul Lange pala...@gmx.de --- Review flag reset. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 838423] Review Request: zukiwi - Themes for GTK+2, GTK+3, Metacity and GNOME Shell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838423 Mattia Meneguzzo mattia.meneguzzo+fed...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Mattia Meneguzzo mattia.meneguzzo+fed...@gmail.com --- Package Change Request == Package Name: zukiwi Short Description: The Zukiwi themes for GTK+2, GTK+3, Metacity, GNOME Shell and Xfwm4, created by lassekongo83. Owners: odysseus I've corrected only the Short Description string. No further changes needed. Thank you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834552] Review Request: pdfmod - A simple application for modifying PDF documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834552 Ismael Olea ism...@olea.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Ismael Olea ism...@olea.org --- cvs request -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 838344] Review Request: hokuyoaist - Hokuyo Laser SCIP driver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838344 --- Comment #6 from Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com --- I filed a bug upstream[1] asking for clarification on the package versioning. [1] https://github.com/gbiggs/hokuyoaist/issues/2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 839742] Review Request: perl-Rose-Object - Simple object base class
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839742 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 839742] Review Request: perl-Rose-Object - Simple object base class
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839742 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Rose-Object-0.859-5.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Rose-Object-0.859-5.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 839851] Review Request: mate-common -- mate common build files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851 raveit65 chat-to...@raveit.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chat-to...@raveit.de --- Comment #35 from raveit65 chat-to...@raveit.de --- A little correction from me. BuildRequires: automake BuildRequires: autoconf Requires: automake Requires: autoconf Requires: libtool Requires: gettext Requires: pkgconfig because for building you need only automake and autoconf but for a working package after installation we need all the requires. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834552] Review Request: pdfmod - A simple application for modifying PDF documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834552 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 838423] Review Request: zukiwi - Themes for GTK+2, GTK+3, Metacity and GNOME Shell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838423 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Misformatted request; WARNING: No new branches requested. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 839851] Review Request: mate-common -- mate common build files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851 --- Comment #36 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- Oops indeed, missed my MUST item 1 above about adding the Requires: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 841001] Review Request: libmatewnck - MATE Desktop Window Navigator Construction Kit libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841001
raveit65 chat-to...@raveit.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chat-to...@raveit.de
--- Comment #1 from raveit65 chat-to...@raveit.de ---
my suggestion:
Summary: Window Navigator Construction Kit
Name: libmatewnck
Version: 1.4.0
Release: 1%{?dist}
URL: http://pub.mate-desktop.org
Source0:
http://pub.mate-desktop.org/releases/1.4/%{name}-%{version}.tar.xz
License: LGPLv2+
Group: System Environment/Libraries
Requires: startup-notification
BuildRequires: glib2-devel
BuildRequires: gtk2-devel
BuildRequires: pango-devel
BuildRequires: startup-notification-devel
BuildRequires: libXt-devel
BuildRequires: libXres-devel
BuildRequires: gettext
BuildRequires: intltool
BuildRequires: gobject-introspection-devel
BuildRequires: mate-common
BuildRequires: gtk-doc
BuildRequires: cairo-gobject-devel
%description
libmatewnck (pronounced libmatewink) is used to implement pagers, tasklists,
and other such things. It allows applications to monitor information
about open windows, workspaces, their names/icons, and so forth.
%package devel
Summary: Libraries and headers for libmatewnck
Group: Development/Libraries
Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
%description devel
The %{name}-devel package contains libraries and header files for
developing applications that use %{name}.
%prep
%setup -q
NOCONFIGURE=1 ./autogen.sh
%build
%configure \
--disable-static \
--enable-introspection \
--enable-gtk-doc \
--enable-startup-notification
make %{?_smp_mflags}
%install
make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL=install -p
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*.la' -exec rm -f {} ';'
%find_lang %{name}
%post -p /sbin/ldconfig
%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
%files -f %{name}.lang
%doc AUTHORS COPYING README NEWS
%{_bindir}/matewnck-urgency-monitor
%{_bindir}/matewnckprop
%{_libdir}/lib*.so.*
%{_libdir}/girepository-1.0/Matewnck-1.0.typelib
%files devel
%{_libdir}/lib*.so
%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/*
%{_includedir}/*
%{_datadir}/gir-1.0/Matewnck-1.0.gir
%doc %{_datadir}/gtk-doc
%changelog
* Mon Jul 09 2012 Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de - 1.4.0-1
- update to 1.4.0
Only the licence information isn't checked.
It's from libwnck.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 838423] Review Request: zukiwi - Themes for GTK+2, GTK+3, Metacity and GNOME Shell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838423 Mattia Meneguzzo mattia.meneguzzo+fed...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Mattia Meneguzzo mattia.meneguzzo+fed...@gmail.com --- Package Change Request == Package Name: zukiwi Short Description: The Zukiwi themes for GTK+2, GTK+3, Metacity, GNOME Shell and Xfwm4, created by lassekongo83. New Branches: f17 Owners: odysseus Was the previous request misformatted because of the missing branch field? If so, here's a new request. The only thing that needs to be changed is the Short Description field. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 841335] Review Request: gnusim8085 - Graphical simulator for 8085 assembly language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841335 Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@gmail.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: gnusim8085 Short Description: Graphical simulator for 8085 assembly language Owners: puiterwijk Branches: f16 f17 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 841335] Review Request: gnusim8085 - Graphical simulator for 8085 assembly language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841335 --- Comment #11 from Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@gmail.com --- Package Change Request == Package Name: gnusim8085 New Branches: f16 f17 Owners: puiterwijk Sorry for my mistaken new request. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 841003] Review Request: mate-corba - CORBA Object Request Broker for MATE Desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841003
raveit65 chat-to...@raveit.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chat-to...@raveit.de
--- Comment #1 from raveit65 chat-to...@raveit.de ---
my suggestion:
This spec file is based from the original from Eric Smith.
%define libidl_version 0.8.2-1
%define glib2_version 2.2.0
Summary: A high-performance CORBA Object Request Broker
Name: mate-corba
Version: 1.4.0
Release: 1%{?dist}
Source:
http://pub.mate-desktop.org/releases/1.4/%{name}-%{version}.tar.xz
Group: System Environment/Daemons
License: LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+
URL: http://pub.mate-desktop.org
BuildRequires: libIDL-devel = %{libidl_version}
BuildRequires: glib2-devel = %{glib2_version}
BuildRequires: pkgconfig = 0.14
BuildRequires: libtool
BuildRequires: autoconf
BuildRequires: automake
BuildRequires: gtk-doc
BuildRequires: mate-common
# handle ref leaks in the a11y stack more gracefully
Patch0: mate-corba-2.14.3-ref-leaks.patch
%description
mate-corba is a high-performance CORBA (Common Object Request Broker
Architecture) ORB (object request broker). It allows programs to
send requests and receive replies from other programs, regardless
of the locations of the two programs. CORBA is an architecture that
enables communication between program objects, regardless of the
programming language they're written in or the operating system they
run on.
You will need to install this package and mate-corba-devel if you want to
write programs that use CORBA technology.
%package devel
Summary: Development libraries, header files and utilities for mate-corba
Group: Development/Libraries
Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
Requires: indent
Requires: libIDL-devel = %{libidl_version}
Requires: glib2-devel = %{glib2_version}
# we install a pc file
Requires: pkgconfig
# we install an automake macro
Requires: automake
%description devel
mate-corba is a high-performance CORBA (Common Object Request Broker
Architecture) ORB (object request broker) with support for the
C language.
This package contains the header files, libraries and utilities
necessary to write programs that use CORBA technology.
%prep
%setup -q -n %{name}-%{version}
%patch0 -p1 -b .ref-leaks
NOCONFIGURE=1 ./autogen.sh
%build
# let's use the ./autogen.sh hammer for now.
%configure \
--disable-static \
--enable-gtk-doc \
--enable-purify
make %{?_smp_mflags}
%install
make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.la
rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/matecorba-2.0/*.*a
# fix multilib conflict caused by matecorba-config.h
%ifarch x86_64 s390x ia64 ppc64 alpha sparc64
%define wordsize 64
%else
%define wordsize 32
%endif
mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_includedir}/matecorba-2.0/matecorba/matecorba-config.h \
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_includedir}/matecorba-2.0/matecorba/matecorba-config-%{wordsize}.h
cat $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_includedir}/matecorba-2.0/matecorba/matecorba-config.h
EOF
ifndef MATECORBA_MULTILIB
define MATECORBA_MULTILIB
include bits/wordsize.h
if __WORDSIZE == 32
include matecorba-config-32.h
elif __WORDSIZE == 64
include matecorba-config-64.h
else
error unexpected value for __WORDSIZE macro
endif
endif
EOF
%post -p /sbin/ldconfig
%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc AUTHORS COPYING README TODO
%{_libdir}/*.so.*
%dir %{_libdir}/matecorba-2.0
%{_libdir}/matecorba-2.0/*.so*
%files devel
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%{_libdir}/*.so
# this is needed by matecomponent
%{_libdir}/libname-matecorba-server-2.a
%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/*
%{_bindir}/matecorba-idl-2
%{_bindir}/matecorba-typelib-dump
%{_bindir}/matecorba2-config
%{_bindir}/matecorba-ior-decode-2
%{_includedir}/*
%{_datadir}/aclocal/*
%{_datadir}/idl/matecorba-2.0
%{_bindir}/matecorba-linc-cleanup-sockets
%{_datadir}/gtk-doc
%changelog
* Thu Jul 05 2012 Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de - 1.4.0-1
- update to 1.4.0
* Tue Mar 27 2012 Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de - 1.2.2-1
- update to 1.2.2
* Thu Mar 01 2012 Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de - 1.2.1-1
-update verion to 1.2
* Sun Feb 19 2012 Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de - 1.1.0-3
- fix rpmbuild error mate-netspeed-applet
* Fri Feb 17 2012 Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de - 1.1.0-2
- rebuild for enable builds for .i686
* Wed Jan 10 2012 Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de - 1.1.0-1
- jump to new version 1.1.0
* Sun Nov 13 2011 Eric Smith e...@brouhaha.com - 1.0-1.2012gitebd4a9bf6a
- mate-corba spec based on Fedora 14 ORBit-2.14.19-1 spec
I'm not shure if we really need this patch, but this package working well for 7
month on my repo.
IHMO it's not necessary to invent the wheel new ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 821404] Review Request: gimp-dds-plugin - A plugin for GIMP allows to load/save in the DDS format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821404 Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Comment #15 is|1 |0 private|| --- Comment #18 from Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com --- Vasiliy, Your doing a good job of prepping for joining the packager group, but would you mind doing a full review on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551? This includes filling in the [ ] spots in the review. Regards -steve -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 841335] Review Request: gnusim8085 - Graphical simulator for 8085 assembly language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841335 --- Comment #12 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com --- Re: comment 9 / Jon Ciesla Not so impressive that chitlesh is a co-maintainer indeed, but has not responded to the FTBFS/bug reports since 2010, which effectively lead to releng retiring this package: http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/gnusim8085 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8600 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 840244] Review Request: Singular-surf - Tool to visualize some real algebraic geometry
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840244
Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi
--- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi ---
%{?_dist} is wrong, it should read %{?dist}.
**
%dir %{_datadir}/surf
%{_datadir}/surf/surf.xpm
Why do things so complex? This is the same as
%{_datadir}/surf/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 840244] Review Request: Singular-surf - Tool to visualize some real algebraic geometry
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840244 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi --- I think that you can't assume that only Singular uses the application, since it looks like a rather general use application (it has a GUI after all). Please contact upstream, and ask them to come up with a less general name for the application. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 838423] Review Request: zukiwi - Themes for GTK+2, GTK+3, Metacity and GNOME Shell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838423 --- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- f17 already exists. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 839742] Review Request: perl-Rose-Object - Simple object base class
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839742 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Rose-Object-0.859-5.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Rose-Object-0.859-5.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 841335] Review Request: gnusim8085 - Graphical simulator for 8085 assembly language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841335 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Agreed, the non-responsive process is likely warranted. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 841335] Review Request: gnusim8085 - Graphical simulator for 8085 assembly language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841335 Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(mschwendt@gmail.c ||om) --- Comment #14 from Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@gmail.com --- I have taken sent an email to the previous maintainer (sherry151) requesting him to transfer EPEL-5 and EPEL-6 to me. But could this package be unblocked for f18, since koji currently will not allow me to build for it (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4264898)? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 841483] Review Request: kde-plasma-mail-checker - Plasmoid for checking a new messages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841483 --- Comment #2 from Fl@sh kaperan...@gmail.com --- New: Spec: https://raw.github.com/F1ash/plasmaMailChecker/simple/kde-plasma-mail-checker.spec SRPM: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4790/4264790/kde-plasma-mail-checker-1.7.31-1.fc17.src.rpm In Comment #1.3 : for Fedora koji not corrected (i`m make two attempt); -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834552] Review Request: pdfmod - A simple application for modifying PDF documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834552 Ismael Olea ism...@olea.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2012-07-19 11:17:38 --- Comment #12 from Ismael Olea ism...@olea.org --- thanks both :-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 835049] Add mkrdns to Fedora packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835049 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2012-07-19 11:22:32 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi --- This is not a bug. Add mkrdns to the Fedora wishlist. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 835049] Add mkrdns to Fedora packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835049 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi --- ... or as instructed by Bill in comment #2, join the Fedora maintainers and submit your package for review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 839742] Review Request: perl-Rose-Object - Simple object base class
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839742 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Rose-Object-0.859-5.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Rose-Object-0.859-5.fc16 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 840244] Review Request: Singular-surf - Tool to visualize some real algebraic geometry
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840244
--- Comment #4 from pcpa paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #2)
%{?_dist} is wrong, it should read %{?dist}.
**
Thanks. I messed something when finishing the package and uploading,
as I had it correct in my computer:
$ rpm -q Singular-surf
Singular-surf-1.0.6-1.x86_64
%dir %{_datadir}/surf
%{_datadir}/surf/surf.xpm
Why do things so complex? This is the same as
%{_datadir}/surf/
Thanks. For some reason I made this mistake when packaging version
1.0.5 in Mandriva some years ago.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 841003] Review Request: mate-corba - CORBA Object Request Broker for MATE Desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841003
--- Comment #2 from raveit65 chat-to...@raveit.de ---
Opps,
removing *.la files is a bad idea because for building mate-desktop we need
them.
remove those lines:
rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.la
rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/matecorba-2.0/*.*a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 841003] Review Request: mate-corba - CORBA Object Request Broker for MATE Desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841003
--- Comment #3 from raveit65 chat-to...@raveit.de ---
and add those lines to files.
%{_libdir}/libMateCORBA-2.la
%{_libdir}/libMateCORBA-imodule-2.la
%{_libdir}/libMateCORBACosNaming-2.la
%{_libdir}/matecorba-2.0/Everything_module.la
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 840244] Review Request: Singular-surf - Tool to visualize some real algebraic geometry
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840244 --- Comment #5 from pcpa paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #3) I think that you can't assume that only Singular uses the application, since it looks like a rather general use application (it has a GUI after all). Yes. I did choose it because it actually gets a lot of google hits. Please contact upstream, and ask them to come up with a less general name for the application. I can open a bug report, but I am afraid chances are very small of upstream changing the name, but as I said in the initial comment, I can patch Singular to use another name. I do not know why the surf package has not been rebuilt for some time also: $ repoquery -i surf Name: surf Version : 0.4.1 Release : 3.fc15 Architecture: x86_64 Size: 31272 Packager: Fedora Project Group : Applications/Internet URL : http://surf.suckless.org/ Repository : rawhide Summary : Simple web browser Source : surf-0.4.1-3.fc15.src.rpm Description : surf is a simple web browser based on WebKit/GTK+. but git log shows release was bumped for f17 mass rebuild. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 840149] Tracker for MATE packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840149 raveit65 chat-to...@raveit.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chat-to...@raveit.de --- Comment #7 from raveit65 chat-to...@raveit.de --- @ nyan cat I patched this cat away today! A test build from mate-desktop is working well. patch: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/49862637/Mate-desktop/mate-desktop_remove_nyan-cat.patch mate-about: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/49862637/Mate-desktop/mate-about.png -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 840244] Review Request: Singular-surf - Tool to visualize some real algebraic geometry
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840244 --- Comment #6 from pcpa paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com --- Contacted upstream about name issue https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3545933group_id=3275atid=103275 Correction to packaging problems: Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pcpa/Singular-surf.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pcpa/Singular-surf-1.0.6-2.fc18.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828370] Review Request: drupal6-comment_bonus_api - Comment Bonus API for Drupal6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828370 Wesley Hearn whe...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Wesley Hearn whe...@redhat.com --- Thanks for the fix, it is now passed! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 817315] Review Request: megaglest - Open Source 3d real time strategy game
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817315 --- Comment #24 from pcpa paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com --- New package addressing Simone review and updating license tag: Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pcpa/megaglest.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pcpa/megaglest-3.6.0.3-5.fc18.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 785444] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Alarm - Horde Alarm Libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785444 --- Comment #2 from Nick Bebout n...@fedoraproject.org --- I believe all of the normal blockers for the php-horde-Horde-* packages are fixed with this package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 785446] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Argv - Horde command-line argument parsing package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785446 --- Comment #3 from Nick Bebout n...@fedoraproject.org --- I believe all of the normal blockers for the php-horde-Horde-* packages are fixed with this package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 785447] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Auth - Horde Authentication API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785447 --- Comment #4 from Nick Bebout n...@fedoraproject.org --- I believe all of the normal blockers for the php-horde-Horde-* packages are fixed with this package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 785449] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Browser - Horde Browser API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785449 --- Comment #3 from Nick Bebout n...@fedoraproject.org --- I believe all of the normal blockers for the php-horde-Horde-* packages are fixed with this package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 785450] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Cache - Horde Caching API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785450 Nick Bebout n...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fed...@famillecollet.com --- Comment #3 from Nick Bebout n...@fedoraproject.org --- I believe all of the normal blockers for the php-horde-Horde-* packages are fixed with this package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 785493] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Cli - Horde Command Line Interface API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785493 --- Comment #4 from Nick Bebout n...@fedoraproject.org --- I believe all of the normal blockers for the php-horde-Horde-* packages are fixed with this package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 785494] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Compress - Horde Compression API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785494 --- Comment #6 from Nick Bebout n...@fedoraproject.org --- I believe all of the normal blockers for the php-horde-Horde-* packages are fixed with this package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
