[Bug 847604] New: Review Request: libmatekbd - A keyboard configuration library for MATE Desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847604 Bug ID: 847604 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: libmatekbd - A keyboard configuration library for MATE Desktop Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: dan.mas...@gmail.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/matespec/libmatekbd.spec SRPM URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/materpms/srpms/libmatekbd-1.4.0-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: A keyboard configuration library for MATE Desktop -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 840149] Tracker for MATE packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840149 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||847604 (libmatekbd) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847604] Review Request: libmatekbd - A keyboard configuration library for MATE Desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847604 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||840149 (MATE-DE-tracker) Alias||libmatekbd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 846212] Review Request: libumberlog - CEE-enhanced syslog API library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846212 --- Comment #12 from Milan Bartos mbar...@redhat.com --- Hi Christophe, 2) i've removed /sbin/ldconfig, new spec file and src.rpm are at http://146.255.30.135/fedora/libumberlog_3/ ad 1) according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License:_field, The License: field refers to the licenses of the contents of the binary rpm. And because picture in data/ (which is only file under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license) is _not_ packaged in any of the libumberlog binary rpms, i'm not going to change License tag as it would (imho) break Guidelines. Regards, Milan -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 846913] Review Request: communi - Communi is a cross-platform IRC client library written with Qt 4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846913 --- Comment #22 from Jan Kaluža jkal...@redhat.com --- Ehm, why not to check my spec file which works? You would see I'm using qmake-qt4 and INSTALL_ROOT there... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 846660] Review Request: mate-dialogs -- Display dialog boxes from shell scripts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846660 Tomas Hoger tho...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|Security| CC|security-response-team@redh | |at.com | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 785371] Review request: speed-dreams - The Open Racing Car Simulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785371 --- Comment #47 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de --- thanks for your review. %changelog * Mon Aug 13 2012 Martin Gansser linux4mar...@gmx.de 2.1.0-2.trunk_r4810 - removed extra docs folder because of file redundancy - leave comment, why removed docs folder Spec URL: http://dev.speed-dreams.org/Martin/speed-dreams-2.1.0-2.trunk_r4810.fc17/speed-dreams.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847643] New: Review Request: libmateweather - Libraries to allow MATE Desktop to display weather information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847643 Bug ID: 847643 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: libmateweather - Libraries to allow MATE Desktop to display weather information Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: dan.mas...@gmail.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/matespec/libmateweather.spec SRPM URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/materpms/srpms/libmateweather-1.4.0-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Libraries to allow MATE Desktop to display weather information -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 840149] Tracker for MATE packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840149 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||847643 (libmateweather) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847643] Review Request: libmateweather - Libraries to allow MATE Desktop to display weather information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847643 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||840149 (MATE-DE-tracker) Alias||libmateweather -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844721] Review request: python-django-flash - A Django extension to provide support for Rails-like flash
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844721 --- Comment #10 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com --- Luis, please create the %check section and run the tests there, please. I consider this to be a blocker, when tests are available and we don't run them. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 822889] Review Request: jasypt - Java Simplified Encryption
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822889 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 822920] Review Request: activeio - Apache ActiveMQ ActiveIO :: Core
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822920 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 822929] Review Request: activemq-protobuf - ActiveMQ Protocol Buffers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822929 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828993] Review Request: l3afpad - Simple text editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828993 --- Comment #5 from Benedikt Schäfer bened...@schaefer-flieden.de --- Hi, sorry that i answer only now, but i completely forgot it. Here are the corrections: Spec URL: http://ib54003.fedorapeople.org/rpm/l3afpad/l3afpad.spec SRPM URL: http://ib54003.fedorapeople.org/rpm/l3afpad/l3afpad-0.8.18.1.9-1.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 822832] Review Request: josql - library to apply SQL-like syntax to Java objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822832 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 846562] Review Request: nqp - Not Quite Perl (6)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846562 --- Comment #5 from Gerd Pokorra g...@zimt.uni-siegen.de --- - License: For the license I think I have to contact the developers of npq, that they will change it in the upstream and use sha1 from the system library. - devel sub-package: I made a build of NQP with the .so files in a -devel subpackage. Then nqp did not run any more. So I add a comment in the spec file to explain it. The new URLs are: Spec: http://ftp.uni-siegen.de/review/nqp_3.spec SRPM: http://ftp.uni-siegen.de/review/nqp-0.0.2012.07-3.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 843404] Review Request: javaparser - Java 1.5 Parser and AST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843404 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 842032] Review Request: eclipse-wtp-jsf - Tools for building JSF-based, web-enabled applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842032 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 846562] Review Request: nqp - Not Quite Perl (6)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846562 --- Comment #6 from Gerd Pokorra g...@zimt.uni-siegen.de --- I do not want to push this package into EPEL-5. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847684] New: Review Request: mate-notification-daemon - Notification daemon for MATE Desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847684 Bug ID: 847684 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: mate-notification-daemon - Notification daemon for MATE Desktop Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: dan.mas...@gmail.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/matespec/mate-notification-daemon.spec SRPM URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/materpms/srpms/mate-notification-daemon-1.4.0-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Notification daemon for MATE Desktop -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 845057] Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive - Only use Sub::Exporter if you need it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845057 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 840149] Tracker for MATE packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840149 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||847684 ||(mate-notification-da) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847684] Review Request: mate-notification-daemon - Notification daemon for MATE Desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847684 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu Blocks||840149 (MATE-DE-tracker) Alias||mate-notification-da -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847690] New: Review Request: php-pear-XML-RPC - PHP implementation of the XML-RPC protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847690 Bug ID: 847690 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: php-pear-XML-RPC - PHP implementation of the XML-RPC protocol Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: fed...@famillecollet.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/remicollet/remirepo/master/php/pear/php-pear-XML-RPC/php-pear-XML-RPC.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/php-pear-XML-RPC-1.5.5-1.remi.src.rpm Description: A PEAR-ified version of Useful Inc's XML-RPC for PHP. It has support for HTTP/HTTPS transport, proxies and authentication. Fedora Account System Username: remi This extension is currently provided by main php-pear, but PEAR doesn't use it anymore. So I plan to drop it from php-pear package. Change to php-pear.spec https://github.com/remicollet/remirepo/commit/547aa5259a0f11a0b8270310ea05e5bb011b41bc Test package : http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/php-pear-1.9.4-9.remi.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847690] Review Request: php-pear-XML-RPC - PHP implementation of the XML-RPC protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847690 --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- Of course, this change will be Fedora = 18 only -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847697] New: Review Request: mate-backgrounds - Backgrounds for MATE Desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847697 Bug ID: 847697 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: mate-backgrounds - Backgrounds for MATE Desktop Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: dan.mas...@gmail.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/matespec/mate-backgrounds.spec SRPM URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/materpms/srpms/mate-backgrounds-1.4.0-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Backgrounds for MATE Desktop -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 840149] Tracker for MATE packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840149 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||847697 (mate-backgrounds) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847697] Review Request: mate-backgrounds - Backgrounds for MATE Desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847697 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu Blocks||840149 (MATE-DE-tracker) Alias||mate-backgrounds -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 843767] Review Request: python-pandas - Python library providing high-performance data analysis tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843767 Kushal Das kushal...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Kushal Das kushal...@gmail.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-pandas Short Description: Python library providing high-performance data analysis tools Owners: kushal Branches: el6 f18 f17 InitialCC: kushal -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 846928] Review Request: python-walkdir - Python module to manipulate and filter os.walk() style iteration
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846928 Kushal Das kushal...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Kushal Das kushal...@gmail.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-walkdir Short Description: Python module to manipulate and filter os.walk() style iteration Owners: kushal Branches: el6 f18 f17 InitialCC: kushal -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847712] New: Review Request: mate-menus - Displays menus for MATE Desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847712 Bug ID: 847712 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: mate-menus - Displays menus for MATE Desktop Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: dan.mas...@gmail.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/matespec/mate-menus.spec SRPM URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/materpms/srpms/mate-menus-1.4.0-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Displays menus for MATE Desktop -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 840149] Tracker for MATE packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840149 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||847712 (mate-menus) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847712] Review Request: mate-menus - Displays menus for MATE Desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847712 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu Blocks||840149 (MATE-DE-tracker) Alias||mate-menus -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 826701] Review Request: hibernate-tools - Hibernate tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826701 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|847496 | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847725] New: Review Request: mate-window-manager - MATE Desktop window manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847725 Bug ID: 847725 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: mate-window-manager - MATE Desktop window manager Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: dan.mas...@gmail.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/matespec/mate-window-manager.spec SRPM URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/materpms/srpms/mate-window-manager-1.4.0-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: MATE Desktop window manager -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844165] Review Request: mate-window-manager - Unobtrusive window manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844165 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Alias|mate-window-manager | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847725] Review Request: mate-window-manager - MATE Desktop window manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847725 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chat-to...@raveit.de --- Comment #1 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com --- *** Bug 844165 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844165] Review Request: mate-window-manager - Unobtrusive window manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844165 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|Reopened| Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed|2012-08-06 05:08:49 |2012-08-13 07:18:20 --- Comment #31 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 847725 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844165] Review Request: mate-window-manager - Unobtrusive window manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844165 --- Comment #32 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com --- I've redone the package, Wolfgang is more than welcome to review it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847725] Review Request: mate-window-manager - MATE Desktop window manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847725 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||840149 (MATE-DE-tracker) Alias||mate-window-manager -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 840149] Tracker for MATE packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840149 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||847725 ||(mate-window-manager) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847725] Review Request: mate-window-manager - MATE Desktop window manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847725 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||846660 (mate-dialogs) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 846660] Review Request: mate-dialogs -- Display dialog boxes from shell scripts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846660 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||847725 ||(mate-window-manager) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847345] Review Request: libmatecanvas - MateCanvas widget
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847345
--- Comment #2 from Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de ---
(In reply to comment #1)
BuildRequires to drop:
libtool (needed by mate-common)
gettext (needed by intltool)
done
The gail-devel package is deprecated:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/gail
If it is really needed for building this package, we have to look for a
replacement. But if I remember well, gail has been swallowed by Gtk some
time ago. Perhaps an artifact from the early years of Gnome...?
Ahh, this explain why i didn't find gail in mock logs
Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
has to be
Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
done
# for /usr/share/gtk-doc/html
Requires: gtk-doc
Not needed. Because libmatecanvas doesn't need gtk-doc at runtime, you may
co-own the appropriate folder in %files:
%{_datadir}/gtk-doc
It's one of the most used exceptions regarding file ownerships, and it
affects currently more than hundred packages in Fedora, or even more.
done
Use the general description for the -devel package:
The %{name}-devel package contains libraries and header files for
developing applications that use %{name}.
done
The %defattr lines in %files are obsolete. You might drop them, too.
done
new koji scratch build
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4383558
%changelog
* Tue Jul 24 2012 Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de - 1.4.0-6
- initial build for fedora
- edit -devel description
- co-owned %%{_datadir}/gtk-doc and remve gtk-doc requires
- add isa tag
- remove %%defattr lines in %%files
- clean build requires
* Sat Dec 24 2011 Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de - libmate-1.1.0.1
- libmatecanvas.spec based on libgnomecanvas-2.30.3-3.fc17 spec
SPEC:
http://raveit65.fedorapeople.org/Mate-Desktop/f19/SPECS/libmatecanvas.spec
SRPM:
http://raveit65.fedorapeople.org/Mate-Desktop/f19/SRPM/libmatecanvas-1.4.0-6.fc19.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847345] Review Request: libmatecanvas - MateCanvas widget
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847345 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dan.mas...@gmail.com QA Contact|extras...@fedoraproject.org |dan.mas...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844162] Review Request: mate-session-manager - session manager for the MATE desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844162 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|Reopened| --- Comment #2 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com --- I take back my previous comments, please continue the review. We have gotten past our differences and working together now, for the record. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 840149] Tracker for MATE packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840149 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||844162 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844162] Review Request: mate-session-manager - session manager for the MATE desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844162 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||840149 (MATE-DE-tracker) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844162] Review Request: mate-session-manager - session manager for the MATE desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844162 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||mate-session-manager -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847501] Review Request: readosm - Library to extract data from Open Streetmap input files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847501 Jørn Lomax northlo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||northlo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|northlo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jørn Lomax northlo...@gmail.com --- Please add INSTALL, NEWS and README to docs. Is there supposed to be documentation for the devel package? Apart from those two, it's good to go. Nice clean package. I will post the full review when you have fixed them -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847501] Review Request: readosm - Library to extract data from Open Streetmap input files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847501 Jørn Lomax northlo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 840149] Tracker for MATE packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840149 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||844157 (mate-panel) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844157] Review Request: mate-panel - Panel ofthe MATE desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844157 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|Reopened| Blocks||840149 (MATE-DE-tracker) --- Comment #4 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com --- I take back my previous comments, please continue the review. We have gotten past our differences and working together now, for the record. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844151] Review Request: mate-settings-daemon - The daemon sharing settings from MATE to GTK+/KDE applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844151 Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||844162 ||(mate-session-manager) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844162] Review Request: mate-session-manager - session manager for the MATE desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844162 Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||844015 (mate-conf), 844151, ||839851 (mate-common) --- Comment #3 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org --- What's this: # Needed for mate-settings-daemon Requires: mate-control-center When mate-settings-daemon needs this, it should require it, so the session-manager doesn't need to require it. (But I didn't find a mate-settings-daemon nor mate-control-center package...) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844015] Review Request: mate-conf - A process-transparent configuration system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844015 Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||844162 ||(mate-session-manager) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 839851] Review Request: mate-common -- mate common build files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851 Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||844162 ||(mate-session-manager) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844162] Review Request: mate-session-manager - session manager for the MATE desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844162 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org --- Sorry, just the mate-control-center dependency seems missing. mate-settings-daemon is now in the depends on list. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 843767] Review Request: python-pandas - Python library providing high-performance data analysis tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843767 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 846660] Review Request: mate-dialogs -- Display dialog boxes from shell scripts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846660 --- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 846928] Review Request: python-walkdir - Python module to manipulate and filter os.walk() style iteration
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846928 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 838239] Review Request: rubygem-ghost - Allows you to create, list, and modify local hostnames
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838239 Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dpie...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dpie...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 841648] Package Rename Review Request: rubygem-qpid_messaging - Ruby bindings for the Qpid messaging framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841648 --- Comment #6 from Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com --- (In reply to comment #4) Hi Darryl, I'd like to review your package. If possible, could you reciprocate by reviewing this for me? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838239 Gladly. I've taken that review and will provide feedback shortly. Thank you. :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847742] New: Review Request: jmock - Java library for testing code with mock objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847742 Bug ID: 847742 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: jmock - Java library for testing code with mock objects Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: punto...@libero.it Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jmock.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jmock-2.5.1-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: Mock objects help you design and test the interactions between the objects in your programs. The jMock library: * makes it quick and easy to define mock objects, so you don't break the rhythm of programming. * lets you precisely specify the interactions between your objects, reducing the brittleness of your tests. * works well with the auto-completion and re-factoring features of your IDE * plugs into your favorite test framework * is easy to extend. Fedora Account System Username: gil Tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4383709 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 841648] Package Rename Review Request: rubygem-qpid_messaging - Ruby bindings for the Qpid messaging framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841648 --- Comment #7 from Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com --- (In reply to comment #5) snip Issues: 1. RPMLint warnings all look okay. If you want to reduce warnings you can take out the commented code, though not required. 2. gem install portion of the spec file should probably be under the %build section instead of the %prep section. This is shown on the ruby guidelines page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby#.25build 3. Unable to build on Rawhide/F18 due to a missing dependency. It looks like the qpid-cpp-client-devel package you require needs boost 1.48, but Rawhide now has 1.50. Whoever maintains qpid-cpp-client will need to fix that before your package will build. I'm the package maintainer there as well. I'm holding off on doing an update of 0.16 in Rawhide since we're preparing for the 0.18 release in the near future. But I suppose I could go ahead and fix the 0.16 build sooner instead. Please address issue #2 and I'll take another look at your package. I've moved the gem install portion to the %build section per review. Updated SPEC: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-qpid_messaging.spec Updated SRPM: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-qpid_messaging-0.16.0-1.2.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 838239] Review Request: rubygem-ghost - Allows you to create, list, and modify local hostnames
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838239 Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847725] Review Request: mate-window-manager - MATE Desktop window manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847725 leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||leigh123li...@googlemail.co ||m Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2012-08-13 08:12:36 --- Comment #2 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com --- Sorry you can't close https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844165 as it pre-dates your bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 840149] Tracker for MATE packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840149 Bug 840149 depends on bug 847725, which changed state. Bug 847725 Summary: Review Request: mate-window-manager - MATE Desktop window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847725 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844165] Review Request: mate-window-manager - Unobtrusive window manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844165 leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC||leigh123li...@googlemail.co ||m Resolution|DUPLICATE |--- Keywords||Reopened -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 813842] Review Request: glfw , A cross-platform multimedia library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=813842 --- Comment #14 from MERCIER Jonathan bioinfornat...@gmail.com --- fix : Requiring_Base_Package SPEC: http://bioinfornatics.fedorapeople.org/glfw.spec sRPM: http://bioinfornatics.fedorapeople.org/glfw-3.0-4.fc17.src.rpm koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4383713 $ find ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/ ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS ~/rpmbuild/RPMS -type f -iname *glfw* /home/builder/rpmbuild/SPECS/glfw.spec /home/builder/rpmbuild/SRPMS/glfw-3.0-4.fc17.src.rpm /home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/glfw-devel-3.0-4.fc17.x86_64.rpm /home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/glfw-3.0-4.fc17.x86_64.rpm /home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/glfw-debuginfo-3.0-4.fc17.x86_64.rpm $ find ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/ ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS ~/rpmbuild/RPMS -type f -iname *glfw* | xargs rpmlint /home/builder/rpmbuild/SPECS/glfw.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: glfw-20120812gita9ed5b1.tar.xz glfw.src: W: spelling-error Summary(fr) multi - mufti, multiple glfw.src: W: spelling-error Summary(fr_FR) multi - mufti, multiple glfw.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi - mulch, mufti glfw.src: W: spelling-error %description -l fr_FR multi - mufti, multiple glfw.src: W: invalid-url Source0: glfw-20120812gita9ed5b1.tar.xz glfw-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation glfw.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(fr) multi - mufti, multiple glfw.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(fr_FR) multi - mufti, multiple glfw.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi - mulch, mufti glfw.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l fr_FR multi - mufti, multiple 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 11 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847725] Review Request: mate-window-manager - MATE Desktop window manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847725 leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 844165 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844165] Review Request: mate-window-manager - Unobtrusive window manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844165 --- Comment #33 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com --- *** Bug 847725 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 840149] Tracker for MATE packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840149 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||844165 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 846660] Review Request: mate-dialogs -- Display dialog boxes from shell scripts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846660 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||844165 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844165] Review Request: mate-window-manager - Unobtrusive window manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844165 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu Blocks||840149 (MATE-DE-tracker) Depends On||846660 (mate-dialogs) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847725] Review Request: mate-window-manager - MATE Desktop window manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847725 --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- depends... if that's what they agreed on how to handle this. If it hadn't been discussed previously, then yeah, may as well go with the one submitted previously. (I added the other one to the MATE tracker, which may explain why it wasn't noticed) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 826701] Review Request: hibernate-tools - Hibernate tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826701 --- Comment #7 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com --- Some information about versioning of Hibernate Tools. Old SVN repository should not be used. On GitHub there are 3 branches: - 3.4.x - supoprt for hibernate-core 3.3-3.5 - 3.6.x - support for hibernate-core 3.6 - master - support for hibernate-core 4 These 3 versions have different API's and most probably we'll need to package two or all of them. There are no tags at this moment, it should be fixed in the future. Some more info about why we need to have available multiple versions of these libraries. Since we have hibernate3 package and hibernate (4) in plans I thought about having two packages available in Fedora: 1. 3.6.x (hibernate-tools36 package) branch and 2. master (hibernate-tools package) branch But it seems that the 3.4.x branch also needs to be packaged, because the some main code in Hibernate Tools requires it and we would end up in some incompatibility issues: 12:32 @maxandersen mgoldmann: when you create a project in eclipse it has some metadata in the .settings folder. 12:33 @maxandersen mgoldmann: if you share this with another team member (you often do to avoid reconfigure projects) they will not load/behave differently. 12:33 @maxandersen mgoldmann: and if you don't do that - there is the mechanism that uses mvn to let its pom.xml configure your project based on pom.xml and this would also be a bit funky if 3.5 is nothere (there is a typo above and 3.5 should be read 3.4) If this package is not immediately needed, I would postpone it and get back to it once it'll be a hard stop for someone. In the meantime we can find a solution to satisfy all requirements. If any. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 829713] Review Request: grive - An open source Linux client for Google Drive
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829713 --- Comment #13 from Vasiliy Glazov vasc...@gmail.com --- Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/RussianFedora/grive/master/grive.spec SRPM URL: http://koji.russianfedora.ru/packages/grive/0.2.0/3.fc18.R/src/grive-0.2.0-3.fc18.R.src.rpm I added Group. Your not compile in rawhide is temporary problem. And it is rawhide's problem. Now it compile perfectly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847725] Review Request: mate-window-manager - MATE Desktop window manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847725 --- Comment #5 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com --- (In reply to comment #4) depends... if that's what they agreed on how to handle this. If it hadn't been discussed previously, then yeah, may as well go with the one submitted previously. (I added the other one to the MATE tracker, which may explain why it wasn't noticed) Wolfgang had no knowledge of this till Dan closed his assigned rewiew. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 838239] Review Request: rubygem-ghost - Allows you to create, list, and modify local hostnames
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838239
--- Comment #1 from Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com ---
[X] rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.[1]
mcpierce@mcpierce-laptop:ghost-0.3.0 $ rpmlint
rubygem-ghost-0.3.0-1.fc17.src.rpm
(none): E: no installed packages by name rubygem-ghost-0.3.0-1.fc17.src.rpm
0 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[X] The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
[X] The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] .
[X] The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
[X] The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines .
[X] The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
[3]
[X] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.[4]
[X] The spec file must be written in American English. [5]
[X] The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6]
[X] The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it is
used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream URL can be
specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to
deal with this.
[X] The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture. [7]
[X] All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
[X] The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9]
[X] Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.[11]
[X] A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create
a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create
that directory. [13]
[X] A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific situations)[14]
[X] Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with
executable permissions, for example. [15]
[X] Each package must consistently use macros. [16]
[X] The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17]
[1] Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of
large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to
size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [18]
[X] If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of
the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly
if it is not present. [18]
[2] Development files must be in a -devel package. [20]
[2] In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} =
%{version}-%{release} [21]
[X] Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed
should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This
means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with
any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you
feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another
package owns, then please present that at package review time. [23]
[X] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [24]
[X] Each Ruby package must indicate the Ruby ABI version it depends on.
[X] Packages that contain Ruby Gems must be called rubygem-%{gem_name}.
[X] Pure Ruby packages must be built as noarch packages.
[2] If there is test suite available for the package (even separately, for
example not included in the gem but available in the upstream repository), it
should be run in %check.
NOTES:
[1] The ri docs should be moved to a -doc package. [NONBLOCKER]
[2] The Rakefile should either be removed or else included in a -devel
package. [BLOCKER]
[3] The lines to delete an existing $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and create a new one
should be deleted.
* Instead, please use the example %prep section from
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby [BLOCKER]
* Additionally, the %clean section ought to be removed as well.
[NONBLOCKER]
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844151] Review Request: mate-settings-daemon - The daemon sharing settings from MATE to GTK+/KDE applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844151 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||mate-settings-daemon -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 840149] Tracker for MATE packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840149 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||844151 ||(mate-settings-daemon) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844151] Review Request: mate-settings-daemon - The daemon sharing settings from MATE to GTK+/KDE applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844151 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||840149 (MATE-DE-tracker) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847725] Review Request: mate-window-manager - MATE Desktop window manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847725 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Alias|mate-window-manager | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844165] Review Request: mate-window-manager - Unobtrusive window manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844165 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||mate-window-manager -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847725] Review Request: mate-window-manager - MATE Desktop window manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847725 --- Comment #6 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com --- Yeah well, that's what happens when your co-maintainer is 8 or 9 hours ahead of you bruv. Can't stay in sync 24/7. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847755] New: Review Request: gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free - GStreamer streaming media framework bad plugins
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847755 Bug ID: 847755 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free - GStreamer streaming media framework bad plugins Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: bdpep...@gmail.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free.spec SRPM URL: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-0.11.92-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: GStreamer is a streaming media framework, based on graphs of elements which operate on media data. This package contains plug-ins that aren't tested well enough, or the code is not of good enough quality. Fedora Account System Username: bpepple -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 841243] Review Request: gstreamer1-plugins-base - GStreamer streaming media framework base plugins
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841243 Brian Pepple bdpep...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||847755 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847755] Review Request: gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free - GStreamer streaming media framework bad plugins
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847755 Brian Pepple bdpep...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||841243 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 846562] Review Request: nqp - Not Quite Perl (6)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846562 --- Comment #7 from Gerd Pokorra g...@zimt.uni-siegen.de --- I tried to replace the included SHA1 with the SHA from openssl, but it is incompatible. What type of license could be used to accept the 3rdparty software? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847512] Review Request: mailnag - Mail notification daemon for GNOME 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847512
Adrian Reber adr...@lisas.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||adr...@lisas.de
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Adrian Reber adr...@lisas.de ---
Haven't reviewed a package for a while... But here you go:
fedora-review seems happy with only one 'Fail':
[!]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf is only needed if supporting EPEL5
Probably not relevant as there is no GNOME 3 for EPEL5.
mailnag.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-httplib2
Other python.noarch packages are doing the same, so this seems the way to go.
MD5-sum check
-
https://github.com/downloads/pulb/mailnag/mailnag-0.4.2.tar.gz :
MD5SUM this package : 99818dd0a4e23d3d11752262efac
MD5SUM upstream package : 99818dd0a4e23d3d11752262efac
Package ACCEPTed.
I will attach a small patch which enables the use of non standard IMAP ports.
All my IMAP connections are tunneled through SSH and are using non standard
ports and mailnag did not work for me without the patch.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847512] Review Request: mailnag - Mail notification daemon for GNOME 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847512 --- Comment #2 from Adrian Reber adr...@lisas.de --- Created attachment 604000 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=604000action=edit patch for non-standard IMAP ports -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847512] Review Request: mailnag - Mail notification daemon for GNOME 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847512 --- Comment #3 from Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info --- hey, great, many thx; will import later and submit patch upstream -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 846562] Review Request: nqp - Not Quite Perl (6)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846562 --- Comment #8 from Gerd Pokorra g...@zimt.uni-siegen.de --- Would this be the correct license tag: License:Artistic 2.0 and Public Domain and WTFPL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847763] New: Review Request: python-django-keyedcache - Utilities for simplified development of cache aware objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847763 Bug ID: 847763 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: python-django-keyedcache - Utilities for simplified development of cache aware objects Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: bkab...@redhat.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://bkabrda.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/django-keyedcache/python-django-keyedcache.spec SRPM URL: http://bkabrda.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/django-keyedcache/python-django-keyedcache-1.4.6-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Django Keyedcache provides utilities and class mixins for simplified development of cache-aware objects. Used in Satchmo Fedora Account System Username: bkabrda Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4384071 Note: this is a rename review request from django-keyedcache - its maintainer doesn't currently have any time, so I took it instead of him. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847763] Review Request: python-django-keyedcache - Utilities for simplified development of cache aware objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847763 Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||840362 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 845934] Review Request: witty - C++ library for developing web applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845934 Vasiliy Glazov vasc...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vasc...@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Vasiliy Glazov vasc...@gmail.com --- I return and ready to work. 1. First of all, we must understand name of last sources: 3.2.2-p1Jul 27, 2012Wt 3.2.2 patch-level 1 It pre-release or post-release of 3.2.2? Then package name should be if pre: wt-3.2.2-0.1.p1 if post: wt-3.2.2-2.p1 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Non-Numeric_Version_in_Release 2. I think subpackages -devel and -examples can be merged. Because all header files should be in devel. And install -examples without -devel does not make sense. 3. Remove all defattr... from %files section. 4. Remove rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT from %install section. 5. Why you convert absolute symlink to relative? rpmlint warning on it. Please check all packages (and srpm and spec) with rpmlint tool. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821404] Review Request: gimp-dds-plugin - A plugin for GIMP allows to load/save in the DDS format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821404 --- Comment #21 from Vasiliy Glazov vasc...@gmail.com --- Steven, I return and ready to work. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847777] New: Review Request: strata-sdk - Python library for Red Hat customer portal's RESTful service interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=84 Bug ID: 84 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: strata-sdk - Python library for Red Hat customer portal's RESTful service interface Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: krobe...@redhat.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://kojak.fedorapeople.org/strata-sdk.spec SRPM URL: http://kojak.fedorapeople.org/strata-sdk-1.0.1-0.fc17.src.rpm Description: The strata-sdk is a Python based library for interacting with the Red Hat customer portal's RESTful service interface. The library handles connection setup, connection tear down, and will marshal the results to/from the RESTful api into Python objects that have getters and setters for easy processing. With the SDK it is possible to search for solutions, create cases, diagnose logs, and various other activities. Fedora Account System Username: kojak -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
