[Bug 847517] Review Request: php-pear-Net-DNS2 - PHP Resolver library used to communicate with a DNS server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847517 --- Comment #2 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- On our request, upstream now provides LICENSE and tests, so update to 1.2.3 https://github.com/remicollet/remirepo/commit/2f145f1f69d15eadbd555b8b228f0666882c0574 http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/php-pear-Net-DNS2-1.2.3-1.remi.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4401290 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848208] Review Request: owncloud-csync - a file synchroniser utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848208 --- Comment #30 from Gregor Tätzner gre...@freenet.de --- looks good, except that the file names still indicate a unmodified csync. If Andreas is ever going to package stock csync, this will generate file conflicts. After all comment #20 from rdieter is still valid. You can try to patch the CMakeLists.txt files to change the names of the generated libs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 806516] Review Request: python-django-annoying - Eliminate annoying things in the Django framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806516 Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830418] Review Request: python-django-avatar - A reusable django application for handling user avatars
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830418 --- Comment #6 from Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com --- Hi, I am not able to figure out how to do that merge, there is another dev who made some changes for django =1.4 suport. https://github.com/ericflo/django-avatar/pull/37 I need some guide here to make the correct changes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848213] Review Request: cqrlog - An amateur radio contact logging program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848213 --- Comment #3 from Eric Christensen e...@christensenplace.us --- I see where I didn't properly handle the desktop file. I'll fix that now and upload the new SRPM and SPEC. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 840244] Review Request: Singular-surf - Tool to visualize some real algebraic geometry
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840244 --- Comment #10 from pcpa paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #8) I noticed that the configure script reports that it cannot find tiffio.h, even though that file is in libtiff-devel. Do you know what's going on there? Actually, it only checks for tiff34/tiffio.h and if found, it will link to -ltiff34, otherwise, it will include tiffio.h and link to -ltiff. The what link to is defined in configure, and the source that uses it is surf-1.0.6/image-formats/tiffprint.cc: #ifdef TIFF_HEADER_34 #include tiff34/tiffio.h #else #include tiffio.h #endif So, the message in config.log is a bit misleading, but is the expected result. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 845934] Review Request: wt - C++ library for developing web applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845934 --- Comment #15 from Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com --- The -doc subpackage should require -devel. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847755] Review Request: gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free - GStreamer streaming media framework bad plugins
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847755
Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bnoc...@redhat.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bnoc...@redhat.com
--- Comment #3 from Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
C/C++
[x]: MUST Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: MUST Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: MUST Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: MUST Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Generic
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one supported primary architecture.
[x]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Buildroot is not present
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot}
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
[-]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[-]: MUST Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: MUST Development files must be in a -devel package
[-]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[-]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: MUST License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: MUST The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macro.
[x]: MUST Package is named using only allowed ascii characters.
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Package is not relocatable.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[!]: MUST Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) GStreamer -
G Streamer, Streamer, Steamer
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
GStreamer - G Streamer, Streamer, Steamer
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free.src: W: strange-permission gst-p-bad-cleanup.sh
0775L
Make that 755 instead.
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free.src:18: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
gst-plugins-bad-free-0.11.93.tar.xz
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) GStreamer
- G Streamer, Streamer, Steamer
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
GStreamer - G Streamer, Streamer, Steamer
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/gstreamer-1.0/libgstvideoparsersbad.so ['/usr/lib64']
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/gstreamer-1.0/libgstcamerabin2.so ['/usr/lib64']
A couple of rpaths see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Beware_of_Rpath
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-0.11.93/COPYING
Please file a bug
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l
en_US GStreamer - G Streamer, Streamer, Steamer
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-extras.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l
en_US GStreamer - G Streamer, Streamer, Steamer
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-extras.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l
en_US gstreamer - streamer, g streamer, steamer
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-extras.x86_64: W:
[Bug 848209] Review Request: geany-themes - A collection of syntax highlighting color schemes for Geany
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848209 Dominic Hopf dma...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Dominic Hopf dma...@fedoraproject.org --- Thanks very much for this quick review Mario! :) New Package SCM Request === Package Name: geany-themes Short Description: A collection of syntax highlighting color schemes for Geany Owners: dmaphy Branches: f17 f18 el6 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 845934] Review Request: wt - C++ library for developing web applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845934 --- Comment #16 from Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com --- It may be better to use absolute path for the links in -examples subpackage. Since example may generate a Sqlite db file in the same directory, but the directory is not writable for normal user, he/she may have to copy the whole directory to another place and then the example run properly. But then relative symlink will break. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830593] Review Request: perl-B-Generate - Create your own op trees
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830593 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(iarn...@gmail.com | |) | --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-B-Generate.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-B-Generate-1.45-1.fc19.src.rpm Koji URL: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4401531 Indeed it did. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830593] Review Request: perl-B-Generate - Create your own op trees
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830593 Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com --- Approved by cheeselee -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847755] Review Request: gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free - GStreamer streaming media framework bad plugins
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847755 Brian Pepple bdpep...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||GNOME Desktop 682158 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 806516] Review Request: python-django-annoying - Eliminate annoying things in the Django framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806516 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847435] Review Request: perl-X11-Protocol-Other - Miscellaneous X11::Protocol helpers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847435 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848208] Review Request: owncloud-csync - a file synchroniser utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848208 --- Comment #31 from Joseph Marrero jmarr...@gmail.com --- I made 6 patches for the CMakeLists in the package, it builds and installs ok. NEW SRPM: http://jmarrero.fedorapeople.org/packages/owncloud-csync/owncloud-csync-0.50.8-7.fc17.src.rpm NEW SPEC: http://jmarrero.fedorapeople.org/packages/owncloud-csync/owncloud-csync.spec Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4401620 All old files are in: http://jmarrero.fedorapeople.org/packages/owncloud-csync/old/* Please let me know if there is anything else. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848209] Review Request: geany-themes - A collection of syntax highlighting color schemes for Geany
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848209 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848208] Review Request: owncloud-csync - a file synchroniser utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848208 --- Comment #32 from Joseph Marrero jmarr...@gmail.com --- Also I made this: https://docs.google.com/folder/d/0B0IbyJGzQiLLRXBiZVRkMTk4bWc/edit http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4401292 This Is mirall with csync integrated as described here: http://owncloud.org/dev/sync-clients/linux-build/ The thing with this is that it builds just fine in Koji. But when Installing mirall-common installs just fine but when installing owncloud-client or mirall then I get this: Error: Package: mirall-1.0.5-3.fc17.x86_64 (/mirall-1.0.5-3.fc17.x86_64) Requires: libcsync.so.0()(64bit) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest I checked the spec there is not csync dep there and while building CMAKE find csync libs and builds mirall and owncloud-client just fine. But when Installing it complains about libcsync, in the above link It says that if I build mirall this way there is no need to install csync on the machine. Let me know what path to pursue and what goes better along the guidelines of fedora. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 806516] Review Request: python-django-annoying - Eliminate annoying things in the Django framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806516 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 806516] Review Request: python-django-annoying - Eliminate annoying things in the Django framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806516 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-django-annoying-0.7.6-3.20120609hga0de8b.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-django-annoying-0.7.6-3.20120609hga0de8b.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 753577] Review Request: gmsh - finite element grid generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753577 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(vasyu...@gmail.co ||m) --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu --- Haven't seen a bundling request filed yet. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848209] Review Request: geany-themes - A collection of syntax highlighting color schemes for Geany
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848209 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848209] Review Request: geany-themes - A collection of syntax highlighting color schemes for Geany
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848209 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- geany-themes-1.22-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/geany-themes-1.22-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 840037] Review Request:rubygem-openshift-origin-node - Application container runtime for OpenShift
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840037 --- Comment #14 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com --- Is Brenton sponsored? I'll flip the flag when the FE-NEEDSPONSOR blocker is gone. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848208] Review Request: owncloud-csync - a file synchroniser utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848208 --- Comment #33 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- Since we're changing the library soname, you'll need to rebuild mirall against the new one (else, it still wants the old name, as you discoverred). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848211] Review Request: mirall - owncloud desktop client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848211 --- Comment #6 from Gregor Tätzner gre...@freenet.de --- Very well, the objective is now to make use of the new owncloud-csync libs. For that you have to patch the buildsys again. I've attached a small patch...something in this way should do the job And can you comment please on that BuildReq to xinetd? (In reply to comment #5) asked uptream about the posiblity of moving /etc/exclude.lst to /etc/mirall/exclude.lst and adding versioning to the libs. excellent -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848211] Review Request: mirall - owncloud desktop client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848211 --- Comment #7 from Gregor Tätzner gre...@freenet.de --- Created attachment 605354 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=605354action=edit lib rename patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848208] Review Request: owncloud-csync - a file synchroniser utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848208 --- Comment #34 from Gregor Tätzner gre...@freenet.de --- (In reply to comment #32) Also I made this: https://docs.google.com/folder/d/0B0IbyJGzQiLLRXBiZVRkMTk4bWc/edit http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4401292 This Is mirall with csync integrated as described here: http://owncloud.org/dev/sync-clients/linux-build/ Actually this is not about integrating csync into mirall (in other terms: linking the csync lib statically). That page just describes how you can build mirall without having to install the csync devel files system wide. Nevertheless you would need libcsync at runtime in libdir. And thats your problem here: rpm detects the runtime deps of mirall but can't find libcsync (and libocsync is not suitable because you build mirall against libcsync) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848208] Review Request: owncloud-csync - a file synchroniser utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848208 --- Comment #35 from Gregor Tätzner gre...@freenet.de --- apart from that, please mark the doc packages as NoArch. just html stuff in there -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848208] Review Request: owncloud-csync - a file synchroniser utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848208 --- Comment #36 from Joseph Marrero jmarr...@gmail.com --- Ok, I will continue the path of creating the owncloud-csync and mirall packages separate, doing the last build of owncloud-csync to mark NoArch the docs and moving to mirall. Let me know what else is needed to pass the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848208] Review Request: owncloud-csync - a file synchroniser utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848208 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rdie...@math.unl.edu Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #37 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- Ok, I'll do the formal review, since no one's assigned the bug or set the review flag yet. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848211] Review Request: mirall - owncloud desktop client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848211 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rdie...@math.unl.edu Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- I'll do the formal review today, since no one's assigned the bug or set the review flag yet. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847513] Review Request: librasterlite - Support Raster Data Sources within a SpatiaLite DB
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847513 --- Comment #2 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at --- Thanks a lot for noticing this! I had libspatialite built with coverage profiling, which led to this problem. The current libspatialite build solves it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848208] Review Request: owncloud-csync - a file synchroniser utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848208 --- Comment #38 from Joseph Marrero jmarr...@gmail.com --- Added NoArch to the doc packages builded all OK :) NEW SRPM: http://jmarrero.fedorapeople.org/packages/owncloud-csync/owncloud-csync-0.50.8-8.fc17.src.rpm NEW SPEC: http://jmarrero.fedorapeople.org/packages/owncloud-csync/owncloud-csync.spec Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4401867 All old files are in: http://jmarrero.fedorapeople.org/packages/owncloud-csync/old/* -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 843695] Review Request: gecode - Generic constraint development environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843695 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co ||m --- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com --- Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4401812 $ rpmlint -i -v * gecode.i686: I: checking gecode.i686: I: checking-url http://www.gecode.org/ (timeout 10 seconds) gecode.i686: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libgecodegist.so.32.0 exit@GLIBC_2.0 This library package calls exit() or _exit(), probably in a non-fork() context. Doing so from a library is strongly discouraged - when a library function calls exit(), it prevents the calling program from handling the error, reporting it to the user, closing files properly, and cleaning up any state that the program has. It is preferred for the library to return an actual error code and let the calling program decide how to handle the situation. gecode.i686: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libgecodeflatzinc.so.32.0 exit@GLIBC_2.0 This library package calls exit() or _exit(), probably in a non-fork() context. Doing so from a library is strongly discouraged - when a library function calls exit(), it prevents the calling program from handling the error, reporting it to the user, closing files properly, and cleaning up any state that the program has. It is preferred for the library to return an actual error code and let the calling program decide how to handle the situation. gecode.i686: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libgecodedriver.so.32.0 exit@GLIBC_2.0 This library package calls exit() or _exit(), probably in a non-fork() context. Doing so from a library is strongly discouraged - when a library function calls exit(), it prevents the calling program from handling the error, reporting it to the user, closing files properly, and cleaning up any state that the program has. It is preferred for the library to return an actual error code and let the calling program decide how to handle the situation. gecode.src: I: checking gecode.src: I: checking-url http://www.gecode.org/ (timeout 10 seconds) gecode.src: I: checking-url http://www.gecode.org/download/gecode-3.7.3.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) gecode.x86_64: I: checking gecode.x86_64: I: checking-url http://www.gecode.org/ (timeout 10 seconds) gecode.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libgecodeflatzinc.so.32.0 exit@GLIBC_2.2.5 This library package calls exit() or _exit(), probably in a non-fork() context. Doing so from a library is strongly discouraged - when a library function calls exit(), it prevents the calling program from handling the error, reporting it to the user, closing files properly, and cleaning up any state that the program has. It is preferred for the library to return an actual error code and let the calling program decide how to handle the situation. gecode.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libgecodedriver.so.32.0 exit@GLIBC_2.2.5 This library package calls exit() or _exit(), probably in a non-fork() context. Doing so from a library is strongly discouraged - when a library function calls exit(), it prevents the calling program from handling the error, reporting it to the user, closing files properly, and cleaning up any state that the program has. It is preferred for the library to return an actual error code and let the calling program decide how to handle the situation. gecode.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libgecodegist.so.32.0 exit@GLIBC_2.2.5 This library package calls exit() or _exit(), probably in a non-fork() context. Doing so from a library is strongly discouraged - when a library function calls exit(), it prevents the calling program from handling the error, reporting it to the user, closing files properly, and cleaning up any state that the program has. It is preferred for the library to return an actual error code and let the calling program decide how to handle the situation. gecode-debuginfo.i686: I: checking gecode-debuginfo.i686: I: checking-url http://www.gecode.org/ (timeout 10 seconds) gecode-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking gecode-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking-url http://www.gecode.org/ (timeout 10 seconds) gecode-devel.i686: I: checking gecode-devel.i686: I: checking-url http://www.gecode.org/ (timeout 10 seconds) gecode-devel.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. gecode-devel.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary fz Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. gecode-devel.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mzn-gecode Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. gecode-devel.x86_64: I: checking gecode-devel.x86_64: I: checking-url
[Bug 848208] Review Request: owncloud-csync - a file synchroniser utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848208 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #39 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- naming: ok sources: ok $ md5sum *.bz2 322f6fa22ca0e8cd05f23dc0d075e7ca csync-0.50.8.tar.bz2 licensing: ok macros: ok scriptlets: ok builds/installs: ok thanks, looks good now. APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848208] Review Request: owncloud-csync - a file synchroniser utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848208 Joseph Marrero jmarr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?, fedora-cvs? --- Comment #40 from Joseph Marrero jmarr...@gmail.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: owncloud-csync Short Description: a file synchroniser utility Owners: jmarrero Branches: f17 f18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848208] Review Request: owncloud-csync - a file synchroniser utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848208 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 845743] Review Request: adobe-source-sans-pro-fonts - A set of OpenType fonts designed for user interfaces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845743 --- Comment #10 from Lameire Alexis alexisis-pristont...@hotmail.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: adobe-source-sans-pro-fonts Short Description: A set of OpenType fonts designed for user interfaces Owners: alexises Branches: f16 f17 f18 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 845743] Review Request: adobe-source-sans-pro-fonts - A set of OpenType fonts designed for user interfaces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845743 Lameire Alexis alexisis-pristont...@hotmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 806516] Review Request: python-django-annoying - Eliminate annoying things in the Django framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806516 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-django-annoying-0.7.6-3.20120609hga0de8b.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848209] Review Request: geany-themes - A collection of syntax highlighting color schemes for Geany
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848209 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- geany-themes-1.22-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848211] Review Request: mirall - owncloud desktop client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848211 --- Comment #9 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- naming: ok sources: ok $ md5sum mirall*.bz2 b7a96411f092bb16f88e3868a558032f mirall-1.0.5.tar.bz2 1. MUST: build fails, currently does not build against the renamed owncloud-csync, will need some variant of the patch from comment #7 2. MUST: missing icon scriptlets for owncloud-client subpkg -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848211] Review Request: mirall - owncloud desktop client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848211 --- Comment #10 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- oh, and please document/justify (or remove) the following dependencies: BuildRequires: inet Requires: iproute Requires: oxygen-icon-theme -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 845696] Review Request: mate-screensaver - mate-screensaver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845696 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||840149 (MATE-DE-tracker) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 840149] Tracker for MATE packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840149 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||845696 (mate-screensaver) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847345] Review Request: libmatecanvas - MateCanvas widget
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847345 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||847173 (libmatecomponentui) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847173] Review Request: libmatecomponentui - Libmatecomponent user interface components
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847173 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||847345 (libmatecanvas) Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co ||m -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847901] Review Request: spamprobe - A Bayesian spam filter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847901 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com --- Look for a review on this hopefully later today... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 849200] Review Request: connman - A daemon for managing internet connections on Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849200 --- Comment #5 from Pavel Simerda psime...@redhat.com --- Spec URL: http://data.pavlix.net/fedora/connman.spec SRPM URL: data.pavlix.net/fedora/connman-1.5-2.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847901] Review Request: spamprobe - A Bayesian spam filter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847901
--- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com ---
Some general comments/suggestions/changes before the review:
1. Please don't define %{prefix}
2. (not a blocker, but IMHO a good idea) consider using the dist tag on your
version
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:DistTag
3. If you can avoid using %makeinstall that would be good. See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used
4. I'm assuming upstream releases packages in a post release a, b, c, d, way
right?
If so, then your version is fine. If not you may want to look at:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Post-Release_packages
and add a note/comment in the spec about what upstream does here. ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 849200] Review Request: connman - A daemon for managing internet connections on Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849200
--- Comment #6 from Pavel Simerda psime...@redhat.com ---
- %{_includedir}/connman/ is unowned
Fixed.
- Various scriptlets are wrong :
%systemd_preun apache-httpd.service
Bad copy-pasting from wiki. Fixed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 849200] Review Request: connman - A daemon for managing internet connections on Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849200 --- Comment #7 from Pavel Simerda psime...@redhat.com --- Forget about these... will issue a new version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848353] Review Request: python-pthreading - Re-implement threading.Lock, RLock and Condition with libpthread
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848353 --- Comment #3 from Dan Kenigsberg dan...@redhat.com --- Pierre, thanks for your review. Would you give it another round? http://danken.fedorapeople.org/python-pthreading-0.1.1-2.fc16.src.rpm http://danken.fedorapeople.org/python-pthreading.spec I've fixed the fsf address upstream. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 849200] Review Request: connman - A daemon for managing internet connections on Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849200 --- Comment #8 from Pavel Simerda psime...@redhat.com --- - license is not shipped with the rpms Fixed. - there is a test suite shipped with connman, could it be run in %check I've looked at the tests directory and the tests actually seem to be intended for manual run time testing, not automatic build time testing. New build: Spec: http://data.pavlix.net/fedora/connman.spec SRPM: http://data.pavlix.net/fedora/connman-1.5-3.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848211] Review Request: mirall - owncloud desktop client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848211 --- Comment #11 from Joseph Marrero jmarr...@gmail.com --- Spec URL: http://jmarrero.fedorapeople.org/packages/mirall/mirall.spec SRPM URL: http://jmarrero.fedorapeople.org/packages/mirall/mirall-1.0.5-3.fc17.src.rpm http://jmarrero.fedorapeople.org/packages/mirall/old/* -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848211] Review Request: mirall - owncloud desktop client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848211
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #12 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
licensing: ok
scriptlets: ok
macros: ok
3. SHOULD remove
-DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=%{_prefix} -DCMAKE_INSTALL_SYSCONFDIR=%{_sysconfdir}
the default %cmake macro already includes these
otherwise, good work. 3 can be fixed post-review.
APPROVED.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848211] Review Request: mirall - owncloud desktop client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848211 Joseph Marrero jmarr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?, fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Joseph Marrero jmarr...@gmail.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: mirall Short Description: owncloud desktop client Owners: jmarrero Branches: f17 f18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848211] Review Request: mirall - owncloud desktop client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848211 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 849379] New: Review Request: graphite-web - A Django webapp for enterprise scalable realtime graphing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849379 Bug ID: 849379 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: graphite-web - A Django webapp for enterprise scalable realtime graphing Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: jonathanstef...@gmail.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/graphite-web.spec SRPM URL: http://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/graphite-web-0.9.10-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Graphite consists of a storage backend and a web-based visualization frontend. Client applications send streams of numeric time-series data to the Graphite backend (called carbon), where it gets stored in fixed-size database files similar in design to RRD. The web frontend provides user interfaces for visualizing this data in graphs as well as a simple URL-based API for direct graph generation. Graphite's design is focused on providing simple interfaces (both to users and applications), real-time visualization, high-availability, and enterprise scalability. Fedora Account System Username: jsteffan -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 849380] New: Review Request: python-carbon - Back-end data caching and persistence daemon for Graphite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849380 Bug ID: 849380 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: python-carbon - Back-end data caching and persistence daemon for Graphite Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: jonathanstef...@gmail.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/python-carbon.spec SRPM URL: http://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-carbon-0.9.10-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Twisted daemon that listens for time-series data and writes this data out to whisper databases, relays the data or aggregates the data. Carbon is a data collection and storage agent. Fedora Account System Username: jsteffan -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 849381] New: Review Request: python-whisper - Simple database library for storing time-series data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849381 Bug ID: 849381 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: python-whisper - Simple database library for storing time-series data Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: jonathanstef...@gmail.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/python-whisper.spec SRPM URL: http://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-whisper-0.9.10-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: simple database library for storing time-series data (similar in design to RRD) Fedora Account System Username: jsteffan -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 849382] New: Review Request: python-bucky - CollectD and StatsD adapter for Graphite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849382 Bug ID: 849382 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: python-bucky - CollectD and StatsD adapter for Graphite Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: jonathanstef...@gmail.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/python-bucky.spec SRPM URL: http://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-bucky-0.2.2-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Bucky is a small server for collecting and translating metrics for Graphite. It can current collect metric data from CollectD daemons and from StatsD clients. Fedora Account System Username: jsteffan -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847419] Review request: mate-polkit - Integrates polkit with the MATE Desktop environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847419 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rdie...@math.unl.edu Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- I can review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847684] Review Request: mate-notification-daemon - Notification daemon for MATE Desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847684 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rdie...@math.unl.edu Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847697] Review Request: mate-backgrounds - Backgrounds for MATE Desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847697 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rdie...@math.unl.edu Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- I can review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847697] Review Request: mate-backgrounds - Backgrounds for MATE Desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847697
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
naming: ok
sources: ok
$ md5sum *.xz
225a2ce7672c2a236c3b7d01da95af5a mate-backgrounds-1.4.0.tar.xz
licensing
1 SHOULD remove
BuildRequires: mate-conf-devel mate-corba-devel
these aren't needed (builds ok for me without these)
macros: mostly ok, except for:
2. SHOULD not use undefined macro po_package, change
%find_lang %{po_package} --all-name
...
%files -f %{po_package}.lang
to
%find_lang %{name} --all-name
...
%files -f %{name}.lang
3. SHOULD: dir /usr/share/pixmaps/backgrounds seems unowned. mind either
owning this here too, or consider if it's possible to move
/usr/share/pixmaps/backgrounds/mate
to
/usr/share/backgrounds/mate
to be closer to how gnome does things? (fwiw, kde uses /usr/share/wallpapers)
scriptlets: ok (n/a)
fairly good and simple, APPROVED.
please address items 1-3 prior to doing any builds.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 817315] Review Request: megaglest - Open Source 3d real time strategy game
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817315 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-08-18 20:26:43 --- Comment #41 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- megaglest-3.6.0.3-5.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 817315] Review Request: megaglest - Open Source 3d real time strategy game
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817315 --- Comment #42 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- megaglest-3.6.0.3-5.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 842667] Review Request: simple - Asynchronous HTTP server for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842667 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-08-18 20:28:02 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- simple-4.1.21-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828544] Review Request: megaglest-data - Mega Glest data files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828544 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-08-18 20:28:13 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- megaglest-data-3.6.0.3-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847419] Review request: mate-polkit - Integrates polkit with the MATE Desktop environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847419
--- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
1. SHOULD remove
BuildRequires: gtk+-devel
it's not needed
naming: ok
licensing: ok
sources: ok
md5sum *.xz
7eccae36af5f9ee0e38a569fcd34e395 mate-polkit-1.4.0.tar.xz
macros: ok
scriptlets: mostly ok
SHOULD: remove
update-desktop-database /dev/null || :
scriptlets, not needed here.
2. -devel MUST own %{_includedir}/polkit-gtk-mate-1/ (and polkitgtkmate
subdir)
imo, replace
%{_includedir}/polkit-gtk-mate-1/polkitgtkmate/polkitgtkmate.h
%{_includedir}/polkit-gtk-mate-1/polkitgtkmate/polkitgtkmatetypes.h
%{_includedir}/polkit-gtk-mate-1/polkitgtkmate/polkitlockbutton.h
with just
%{_includedir}/polkit-gtk-mate-1/
3. SHOULD drop dup'd
%doc
statement in -devel subpkg
4. SHOULD add
Provides: PolicyKit-authentication-agent
to match other policy kit providers (like gnome-polkit, polkit-kde)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 816071] Review Request: f3 - Utility to test for fake flash drives and cards
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816071 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-08-18 20:28:59 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- f3-2-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828544] Review Request: megaglest-data - Mega Glest data files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828544 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- megaglest-data-3.6.0.3-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847684] Review Request: mate-notification-daemon - Notification daemon for MATE Desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847684
--- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
naming: ok
1. SHOULD move
NOCONFIGURE=1 ./autogen.sh
to %setup section
2. MUST not use undefined macro %po_package, either define it or use %{name}
instead
3. SHOULD add
Provides: desktop-notification-daemon
(assuming it provides dbus service org.freedesktop.Notifications like kde's
knotify or gnome's notification-daemon)
4. SHOULD consider dropping -libs subpkg, I don't see any shared libraries in
use here, so
%files libs
%{_libdir}/mate-notification-daemon/
could probably just be folded into the main package.
licensing: ok
sources: ok
md5sum *.xz
83956e38caeec78634af379abc1b5787 mate-notification-daemon-1.4.0.tar.xz
scriptlets: ok
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 823962] Review Request: apacheds-shared - Shared APIs of Apache Directory Project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823962
Matt Spaulding mspauldin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Matt Spaulding mspauldin...@gmail.com ---
RPMLint Output:
apacheds-shared.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US embeddable -
embedded
apacheds-shared.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US embeddable -
embedded
apacheds-shared.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
apacheds-shared-0.9.19-src-svn.tar.gz
/home/mspaulding/rpmbuild/SPECS/apacheds-shared.spec: W: invalid-url Source0:
apacheds-shared-0.9.19-src-svn.tar.gz
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
Generic
[x]: EXTRA Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
[x]: EXTRA Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one supported primary architecture.
[-]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Buildroot is not present
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
[x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[-]: MUST Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: MUST Development files must be in a -devel package
[-]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[-]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [1]
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[2]
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: MUST Package is named using only allowed ascii characters.
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Package is not relocatable.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: MUST Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. [1]
[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[-]: MUST Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
/usr/sbin.
[x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
--requires).
[x]: SHOULD Package functions as described.
[x]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged.
[x]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from
upstream.
[x]: SHOULD SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}.
[x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL. [1]
[-]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass. [3]
[x]: SHOULD Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: SHOULD Spec use %global
[Bug 845743] Review Request: adobe-source-sans-pro-fonts - A set of OpenType fonts designed for user interfaces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845743 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848208] Review Request: owncloud-csync - a file synchroniser utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848208 --- Comment #41 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848211] Review Request: mirall - owncloud desktop client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848211 --- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847684] Review Request: mate-notification-daemon - Notification daemon for MATE Desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847684 --- Comment #2 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com --- Fixed. Spec URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/matespec/mate-notification-daemon.spec SRPM URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/materpms/srpms/mate-notification-daemon-1.4.0-2.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847419] Review request: mate-polkit - Integrates polkit with the MATE Desktop environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847419 --- Comment #3 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com --- Fixed: Spec URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/matespec/mate-polkit.spec SRPM URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/materpms/srpms/mate-polkit-1.4.0-2.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847684] Review Request: mate-notification-daemon - Notification daemon for MATE Desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847684
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
Noticed some small errors in scriptlets now too (sorry):
%pre
%gconf_schema_prepare
%{buildroot}/%{_sysconfdir}/mateconf/schemas/mate-notification-daemon.schemas
%post -p /sbin/ldconfig
/usr/bin/update-desktop-database /dev/null || :
/bin/touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/mate /dev/null || :
%gconf_schema_upgrade
%{buildroot}/%{_sysconfdir}/mateconf/schemas/mate-notification-daemon.schemas
%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
/usr/bin/update-desktop-database /dev/null || :
%gconf_schema_remove
%{buildroot}/%{_sysconfdir}/mateconf/schemas/mate-notification-daemon.schemas
if [ $1 -eq 0 ] ; then
/bin/touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor /dev/null
/usr/bin/gtk-update-icon-cache -f %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor /dev/null ||
:
fi
%posttrans
/usr/bin/gtk-update-icon-cache -f %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor /dev/null || :
should be (something like):
%pre
%gconf_schema_prepare
%{_sysconfdir}/mateconf/schemas/mate-notification-daemon.schemas
%post
/usr/bin/update-desktop-database /dev/null || :
/bin/touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/mate /dev/null || :
%gconf_schema_upgrade
%{_sysconfdir}/mateconf/schemas/mate-notification-daemon.schemas
%postun
/usr/bin/update-desktop-database /dev/null || :
%gconf_schema_remove
%{_sysconfdir}/mateconf/schemas/mate-notification-daemon.schemas
if [ $1 -eq 0 ] ; then
/bin/touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor /dev/null
/usr/bin/gtk-update-icon-cache -f %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor /dev/null ||
:
fi
%posttrans
/usr/bin/gtk-update-icon-cache -f %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor /dev/null || :
please fix that prior to submitting any builds.
APPROVED.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847697] Review Request: mate-backgrounds - Backgrounds for MATE Desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847697 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: mate-backgrounds Short Description: Backgrounds for MATE Desktop Owners: vicodan raveit65 rdieter Branches: f16 f17 f18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847419] Review request: mate-polkit - Integrates polkit with the MATE Desktop environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847419 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- there's still an extra update-desktop-database /dev/null || : scriptlet, please remove that before doing any builds. APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847419] Review request: mate-polkit - Integrates polkit with the MATE Desktop environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847419 --- Comment #5 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com --- Fixed that. Thanks Rex. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847419] Review request: mate-polkit - Integrates polkit with the MATE Desktop environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847419 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: mate-polkit Short Description: Integrates polkit with the MATE Desktop environment Owners: vicodan rdieter raveit65 Branches: f16 f17 18 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847684] Review Request: mate-notification-daemon - Notification daemon for MATE Desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847684 --- Comment #4 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com --- Fixed that. Thanks Rex. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847684] Review Request: mate-notification-daemon - Notification daemon for MATE Desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847684 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: mate-notification-daemon Short Description: Notification daemon for MATE Desktop Owners: vicodan rdieter raveit65 Branches: f16 f17 18 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847345] Review Request: libmatecanvas - MateCanvas widget
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847345 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847345] Review Request: libmatecanvas - MateCanvas widget
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847345 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- libmatecanvas-1.4.0-6.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libmatecanvas-1.4.0-6.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847345] Review Request: libmatecanvas - MateCanvas widget
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847345 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- libmatecanvas-1.4.0-6.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libmatecanvas-1.4.0-6.fc16 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847643] Review Request: libmateweather - Libraries to allow MATE Desktop to display weather information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847643 --- Comment #3 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com --- Fixed. Spec URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/matespec/libmateweather.spec SRPM URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/materpms/srpms/libmateweather-1.4.0-2.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 840149] Tracker for MATE packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840149 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On|847725 | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847725] Review Request: mate-window-manager - MATE Desktop window manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847725 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|840149 (MATE-DE-tracker)| Depends On|846660 (mate-dialogs) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 846660] Review Request: mate-dialogs -- Display dialog boxes from shell scripts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846660 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|847725 | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
