[Bug 856238] Review Request: scratch - Programming language learning environment for stories, games, music and art
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856238
--- Comment #7 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
Three issues stand out as needing to be fixed:
- Scratch.image bundled by upstream is shipped in the binary RPMs without being
regenerated
- License field should be of the form "X and Y and Z". A breakdown of which
components fall under which license, in a comment above the license field would
be nice esp if it's not the case that the license applies cleanly to a whole
subpackage
- Desktop file needs to be validated and/or installed properly; icon cache
needs to be refreshed
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
C/C++
[x]: MUST Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: MUST Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: MUST Package contains no static executables.
[x]: MUST Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic
[x]: EXTRA Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: EXTRA Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one supported primary architecture.
[x]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[!]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
Is there any reason Scratch.image is not regenerated, but the bundled one
from the source tarball used?
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[!]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
Note: defattr() present in %files squeak-cameraplugin section. This
is OK if packaging for EPEL5. Otherwise not needed
[x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: MUST Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[!]: MUST Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install if
there is such a file.
Don't just copy the desktop file by hand
[-]: MUST Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[!]: MUST Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
Icon cache must be refreshed, else after the installation the Scratch
launcher won't have a proper icon yet:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[!]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf is only needed if supporting EPEL5
[-]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[!]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Licenses should be separated by "and" -- GPLv2 and MIT and CC-BY-SA
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"MIT/X11 (BSD like)" For detailed output of licensecheck see file:
/home/michel/sources/fedora/projects/FedoraReview/src/856238-scratch/licensecheck.txt
[x]: MUST License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[!]: MUST Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
Note: Using both %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[!]: MUST If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
Please describe in a comment which parts are under which licenses
[x]: MUST Package is named using only allowed ascii characters.
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
Note: Package contains no Conflicts: tag(s)
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: MUST If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Package is not relocatable.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, just
[Bug 857730] Review Request: oscpack - A set of C++ classes for packing and unpacking OSC packets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857730 --- Comment #2 from Brendan Jones --- To be honest - I'm not sure. I should have mentioned that this is being moved from the CCRMA repo. I will have to ask Fernando, the maintainer there if he has submitted upstream. I will if he hasn't - I have some further questions for upstream in any case, so that's no problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857843] New: Review Request: lessjs - Less.js The dynamic stylesheet language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857843 Bug ID: 857843 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: lessjs - Less.js The dynamic stylesheet language Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: mru...@redhat.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/lessjs.spec SRPM URL: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/lessjs-1.3.0-20120917git55d6e5a.1.fc17.src.rpm Description: LESS extends CSS with dynamic behavior such as variables, mixins, operations and functions. LESS runs on both the client-side (Chrome, Safari, Firefox) and server-side, with Node.js and Rhino. Fedora Account System Username: mrunge -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857843] Review Request: lessjs - Less.js The dynamic stylesheet language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857843 Matthias Runge changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||815018 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 815018] Review Request: nodejs - javascript fast build framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815018 Matthias Runge changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||857843 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 856175] Review Request: python-nose-xcover - Extends nose.plugins.cover to add Cobertura-style XML reports
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856175 Matthias Runge changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Matthias Runge --- Thank you for the review! I'll contact upstream. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-nose-xcover Short Description: Extends nose.plugins.cover to add Cobertura-style XML reports Owners: mrunge Branches: f18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 837816] Review Request: ergo - A program for large-scale self-consistent field calculations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837816 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola --- COPYING added to %doc. Upstream supplied a patch that fixes the test on i686 (binaries are unaffected), now builds fine http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4490808 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 837816] Review Request: ergo - A program for large-scale self-consistent field calculations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837816 Martin Gieseking changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Martin Gieseking --- OK, great. The packages look good now. You should fix the permissions of the tarball and the spec file, though. $ rpmlint ergo-3.2-2.fc18.src.rpm [...] ergo.src: W: strange-permission ergo-3.2.tar.gz 0660L ergo.src: W: strange-permission ergo.spec 0660L 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. Package APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857865] New: Review Request: emacs-rpm-spec-mode - Major GNU Emacs mode for editing RPM spec files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857865 Bug ID: 857865 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: emacs-rpm-spec-mode - Major GNU Emacs mode for editing RPM spec files Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: kk...@redhat.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://kklic.fedorapeople.org/emacs-rpm-spec-mode.spec SRPM URL: http://kklic.fedorapeople.org/emacs-rpm-spec-mode-0.12-1.el6.src.rpm Description: Major GNU Emacs mode for editing RPM spec files. Fedora Account System Username: kklic The rpm-spec-mode is currently packaged in the emacs package even though it comes from different upstream. Packaging it separately fixes the issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 837816] Review Request: ergo - A program for large-scale self-consistent field calculations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837816 Jussi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola --- Thanks for the review! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ergo Short Description: A program for large-scale self-consistent field calculations Owners: jussilehtola Branches: F-16 F-17 F-18 EL-5 EL-6 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 820115] Review Request: leptonica - C library for efficient image processing and image analysis operations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820115 --- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 856238] Review Request: scratch - Programming language learning environment for stories, games, music and art
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856238 --- Comment #8 from Matthew Miller --- (In reply to comment #7) > Three issues stand out as needing to be fixed: > - Scratch.image bundled by upstream is shipped in the binary RPMs without > being regenerated I'll look into this. I'm not a Squeak expert, but it's my understanding that the image is actually the preferred form for making modifications. See http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/1053 and http://info.scratch.mit.edu/Source_Code -- which raises the point that some of the code within the image is actually MIT and Apache 2.0 licensed. Exciting. So I'll look into _both_ of those issues. > - License field should be of the form "X and Y and Z". A breakdown of which > components fall under which license, in a comment above the license field > would be nice esp if it's not the case that the license applies cleanly to a > whole subpackage Excepting the caveat above, it does happen that all of the subpackages and licenses map nicely in a 1:1 manner. > - Desktop file needs to be validated and/or installed properly; icon cache > needs to be refreshed *nod* -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 817533] Review Request: aether-ant-tasks - Ant tasks using Aether to resolve, install and deploy artifacts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817533
Tomas Radej changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Tomas Radej ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[x]: EXTRA Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: EXTRA Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one supported primary architecture.
[!]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[-]: MUST Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: MUST Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[-]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[-]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[-]: MUST License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: MUST Package is named using only allowed ascii characters.
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
Note: Package contains no Conflicts: tag(s)
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: MUST If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Package is not relocatable.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: MUST Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[-]: MUST Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: SHOULD Buildroot is not present
Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine
[x]: SHOULD Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[!]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
/usr/sbin.
[x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
--requires).
[x]: SHOULD Package functions as described.
[x]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged.
[x]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from
upstream.
[x]: SHOULD SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
Note: Package contains tarball without URL, check comments
[x]: SHOULD SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}.
[x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL.
[-]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file c
[Bug 817533] Review Request: aether-ant-tasks - Ant tasks using Aether to resolve, install and deploy artifacts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817533 Mikolaj Izdebski changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Mikolaj Izdebski --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: aether-ant-tasks Short Description: Ant tasks using Aether to resolve, install and deploy artifacts Owners: mizdebsk Branches: f17 f18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 817533] Review Request: aether-ant-tasks - Ant tasks using Aether to resolve, install and deploy artifacts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817533 --- Comment #5 from Mikolaj Izdebski --- Upstream was asked to include a copy of the license: https://github.com/sonatype/aether-ant-tasks/issues/6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 817533] Review Request: aether-ant-tasks - Ant tasks using Aether to resolve, install and deploy artifacts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817533 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 837816] Review Request: ergo - A program for large-scale self-consistent field calculations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837816 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 856175] Review Request: python-nose-xcover - Extends nose.plugins.cover to add Cobertura-style XML reports
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856175 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 856175] Review Request: python-nose-xcover - Extends nose.plugins.cover to add Cobertura-style XML reports
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856175 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 856175] Review Request: python-nose-xcover - Extends nose.plugins.cover to add Cobertura-style XML reports
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856175 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- python-nose-xcover-1.0.7-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-nose-xcover-1.0.7-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 852211] Review Request: dunst - dmenu-ish lightweight notification-daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852211 --- Comment #14 from Lukas Zapletal --- Sure, sorry about that: http://lzap.fedorapeople.org/fedora-packaging/dunst/0.3.1-3/dunst-0.3.1-3.fc17.src.rpm http://lzap.fedorapeople.org/fedora-packaging/dunst/0.3.1-3/dunst-0.3.1-3.fc17.x86_64.rpm http://github.com/lzap/spec_reviews/raw/master/dunst.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 852892] Review Request: ddccontrol-db - DDC/CI control database for ddccontrol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852892 Jaroslav Škarvada changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Jaroslav Škarvada --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ddccontrol-db Short Description: DDC/CI control database for ddccontrol Owners: jskarvad Branches: f17 f18 InitialCC: jvcelak -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 852893] Review Request: ddccontrol - Control your monitor by software using the DDC/CI protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852893 Jaroslav Škarvada changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Jaroslav Škarvada --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ddccontrol Short Description: Control your monitor by software using the DDC/CI protocol Owners: jskarvad Branches: f17 f18 InitialCC: jvcelak -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 852892] Review Request: ddccontrol-db - DDC/CI control database for ddccontrol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852892 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 852893] Review Request: ddccontrol - Control your monitor by software using the DDC/CI protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852893 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 817533] Review Request: aether-ant-tasks - Ant tasks using Aether to resolve, install and deploy artifacts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817533 Mikolaj Izdebski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2012-09-17 10:10:16 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 852892] Review Request: ddccontrol-db - DDC/CI control database for ddccontrol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852892 --- Comment #10 from Jaroslav Škarvada --- Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 852893] Review Request: ddccontrol - Control your monitor by software using the DDC/CI protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852893 --- Comment #7 from Jaroslav Škarvada --- Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 852503] Review Request: perl-Net-Radius - Object-oriented Perl interface to RADIUS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852503 --- Comment #4 from Olivier Bilodeau --- Ok, I just did: https://github.com/inverse-inc/perl-Net-Radius.spec/commit/813b472dfaa0981c0f32aff5da4d0b0f9a6aba2b The reason I didn't do it is that I thought bumps / ChangeLog entries on unreleased packages undergoing a review would only add clutter and little value. Repoforge guys handled some of my contributions that way with that rationale and so I kept it. My plan was that once released, of course, release and changelog will be bumped on changes. Sorry about my wrong assumptions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854690] Review Request: python-dslib - A Python library for accessing Czech Databox (Datové schránky)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854690
Jaroslav Škarvada changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(jskarvad@redhat.c |
|om) |
--- Comment #2 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I can see only a minor typo on line 30 in the specfile: {buildroot} ->
> %{buildroot}.
Thanks for catching this, new versions:
Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~jskarvad/datovka/python-dslib.spec
SRPM URL:
http://fedorapeople.org/~jskarvad/datovka/python-dslib-2.1.2-2.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857309] Review Request: hash-slinger - Generate various DNS records such as RFC-4255 SSHFP and RFC-698 TLSA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857309 --- Comment #5 from Paul Wouters --- Note that you will still need to change /etc/ssh/ssh_config or ~/.config and add "VerifyHostKeyDNS ask" for your ssh client to actually use these. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857309] Review Request: hash-slinger - Generate various DNS records such as RFC-4255 SSHFP and RFC-698 TLSA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857309 Paul Wouters changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Paul Wouters --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: hash-slinger Short Description: Generate various DNS records such as RFC-4255 SSHFP and RFC-698 TLSA Owners: pwouters Branches: f18 el6 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854679] Review Request: python-sudsds - A python SOAP client modified for usage with Czech Databox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854679
Jaroslav Škarvada changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(jskarvad@redhat.c |
|om) |
--- Comment #4 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
Thanks for the review.
> Specfile:
> - use %global instead of %define
>
> According to python packaging guidelines, you don't have to define
> python_sitelib macro on the first line in the spec.
>
> - do not use BuildRoot:
>
> - do not use rm -rf %{buildroot} in install section (unless you intend to
> use the package for EPEL)
>
> - do not use %defattr (unless you intend to use the package for EPEL)
>
I think I needn't, but I can. Personally I am keeping compatibility with old
EPELs everywhere, but currently python-dslib is not compatible thus I also
removed it from this package.
> - also, I believe there is a typo on line 36:
> + rm -f {buildroot}... should probably be rm -f %{buildroot}...
>
Thanks for the catch, fixed.
> Also, rpmlint complains a lot about incorrect fsf addresses:
> python-sudsds.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sudsds/transport/https.py
> python-sudsds.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sudsds/bindings/__init__.py
> python-sudsds.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sudsds/mx/typer.py
>
> That should probably be reported and corrected by upstream.
>
I am going to report this.
> Also, instead of calling 'python' directly, use the %{__python} macro.
Fixed.
New versions:
Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~jskarvad/datovka/python-sudsds.spec
SRPM URL:
http://fedorapeople.org/~jskarvad/datovka/python-sudsds-1.0-2.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857965] New: Review Request: pdsh - Manages and monitors processes, files, directories and devices.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857965 Bug ID: 857965 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: pdsh - Manages and monitors processes, files, directories and devices. Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: b...@breu.org Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.breu.org/filedrop/monit.el6.spec SRPM URL: http://www.breu.org/filedrop/monit-5.3.1-3.el6.src.rpm Description: Manages and monitors processes, files, directories and devices. This is my first package and I am looking for sponsorship. Koji build at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4491939 Fedora Account System Username: rackerjoe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857965] Review Request: pdsh - Manages and monitors processes, files, directories and devices.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857965 --- Comment #1 from Joseph W. Breu --- This updates the version of monit for rhel6 to 5.3.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 852893] Review Request: ddccontrol - Control your monitor by software using the DDC/CI protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852893 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 852892] Review Request: ddccontrol-db - DDC/CI control database for ddccontrol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852892 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 852893] Review Request: ddccontrol - Control your monitor by software using the DDC/CI protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852893 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- ddccontrol-0.4.2-3.20120904gitc3af663d.fc18,ddccontrol-db-20061014-3.20120904gite8cc385a.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ddccontrol-0.4.2-3.20120904gitc3af663d.fc18,ddccontrol-db-20061014-3.20120904gite8cc385a.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 852892] Review Request: ddccontrol-db - DDC/CI control database for ddccontrol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852892 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- ddccontrol-0.4.2-3.20120904gitc3af663d.fc18,ddccontrol-db-20061014-3.20120904gite8cc385a.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ddccontrol-0.4.2-3.20120904gitc3af663d.fc18,ddccontrol-db-20061014-3.20120904gite8cc385a.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857965] Review Request: monit - Manages and monitors processes, files, directories and devices.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857965 Mark McLoughlin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mar...@redhat.com Summary|Review Request: pdsh - |Review Request: monit - |Manages and monitors|Manages and monitors |processes, files, |processes, files, |directories and devices.|directories and devices. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857965] Update el6 monit to 5.3.1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857965 Mark McLoughlin changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: monit - |Update el6 monit to 5.3.1 |Manages and monitors| |processes, files, | |directories and devices.| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854333] python-transifex
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854333 --- Comment #20 from Luis Bazan --- https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-transifex -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857965] Update el6 monit to 5.3.1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857965 Mark McLoughlin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||b...@breu.org, ||ma...@wzzrd.com, ||michel+...@sylvestre.me, ||s.a...@diffingo.com Component|Package Review |monit Version|rawhide |el6 Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|s.a...@diffingo.com Product|Fedora |Fedora EPEL --- Comment #2 from Mark McLoughlin --- This is an update to an existing EPEL6 package, so we don't need a review request - moving to the Fedora EPEL product and monit component -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857309] Review Request: hash-slinger - Generate various DNS records such as RFC-4255 SSHFP and RFC-698 TLSA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857309 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857524] Review Request: python-django-federated-login - Provides federated logins to django projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857524 --- Comment #4 from Luis Bazan --- SPEC: http://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/python-django-federated-login.spec SRPM: http://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/python-django-federated-login-0.3.0-3.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 837816] Review Request: ergo - A program for large-scale self-consistent field calculations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837816 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 837816] Review Request: ergo - A program for large-scale self-consistent field calculations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837816 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- ergo-3.2-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ergo-3.2-2.el5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 837816] Review Request: ergo - A program for large-scale self-consistent field calculations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837816 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- ergo-3.2-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ergo-3.2-2.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 837816] Review Request: ergo - A program for large-scale self-consistent field calculations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837816 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- ergo-3.2-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ergo-3.2-2.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 837816] Review Request: ergo - A program for large-scale self-consistent field calculations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837816 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- ergo-3.2-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ergo-3.2-2.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 837816] Review Request: ergo - A program for large-scale self-consistent field calculations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837816 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- ergo-3.2-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ergo-3.2-2.fc16 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857524] Review Request: python-django-federated-login - Provides federated logins to django projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857524 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||a.bad...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|a.bad...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi --- ba80c4b0b97f1b53a306e6954d072f67e652f03d2924353a62e609e2c3d7928a django-federated-login-0.3.0.tar.gz APPROVED Good: * Source matches upstream * Package name follows naming guidelines * License is MIT in spec and code * license file included * Spec file is legible * No locale files * Not a C library * No bundled libraries * Not relocatable * Macros used consistently * Code not content * No GUI application * All filenames are UTF-8 * No scriptlets used * builds in koji * Owns directories it creates and nothing more * Permissions on files set properly * rpmlint python-django-federated-login.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) logins -> losing, loins, lo gins python-django-federated-login.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pre -> per, ore, pee python-django-federated-login.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US backend -> backed, back end, back-end 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. These all make sense in the context of the package. Ignorable. Note: * Package currently has no test suite so currently the %check section is a no-op No harm in having it though. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857524] Review Request: python-django-federated-login - Provides federated logins to django projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857524 --- Comment #6 from Luis Bazan --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-django-federated-login Short Description: Provides federated logins to django projects Owners: lbazan Branches: f18 f17 el6 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857524] Review Request: python-django-federated-login - Provides federated logins to django projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857524 Luis Bazan changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832830] Review Request: php-channel-pirum - Adds pear.pirum-project.org channel to PEAR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832830 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- php-channel-pirum-1.0-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 851747] Review Request: mediawiki-intersection - Create a list of pages that are listed in a set of categories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851747 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-09-17 13:23:55 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- mediawiki-intersection-37906-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857992] New: Review Request: JQuery - Fast, concise library that simplifies how you use JavaScript
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857992 Bug ID: 857992 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: JQuery - Fast, concise library that simplifies how you use JavaScript Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: gre...@freenet.de Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Another try of getting jquery into fedora ;)... Spec URL: http://brummbq.fedorapeople.org/jquery.spec SRPM URL: http://brummbq.fedorapeople.org/jquery-1.7.2-2.fc17.src.rpm Description: jQuery is a fast, concise, JavaScript library that simplifies how you traverse HTML documents, handle events, perform animations, and add Ajax interactions to your web pages. jQuery is designed to change the way that you write JavaScript. Fedora Account System Username: brummbq -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854132] Review Request: ghc-show - Haskell show library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854132 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-09-17 13:25:01 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-show-0.4.1.2-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 852851] Review Request: jacorb - The Java implementation of the OMG's CORBA standard
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852851 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-09-17 13:25:39 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- jboss-rmi-1.0-api-1.0.4-5.fc17, jboss-jts-4.16.2-8.fc17, jacorb-2.3.1-3.20120215git.fc17, jboss-as-7.1.1-8.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805015] Review Request: jboss-jts - Distributed Transaction Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805015 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- jboss-rmi-1.0-api-1.0.4-5.fc17, jboss-jts-4.16.2-8.fc17, jacorb-2.3.1-3.20120215git.fc17, jboss-as-7.1.1-8.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847643] Review Request: libmateweather - Libraries to allow MATE Desktop to display weather information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847643 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-09-17 13:26:13 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- libmateweather-1.4.0-5.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805327] Review Request: pyrasite-gui - A graphical interface for monitoring and introspecting Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805327 Bug 805327 depends on bug 805587, which changed state. Bug 805587 Summary: Review Request: jquery - The jQuery JavaScript Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805587 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805587] Review Request: jquery - The jQuery JavaScript Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805587 Gregor Tätzner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed||2012-09-17 13:26:43 --- Comment #6 from Gregor Tätzner --- allright, the party is continuing there: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857992 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 857992 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857992] Review Request: JQuery - Fast, concise library that simplifies how you use JavaScript
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857992 Gregor Tätzner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lmac...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Gregor Tätzner --- *** Bug 805587 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 853050] Review Request: hawtbuf - A rich byte buffer library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853050 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-09-17 13:29:32 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- hawtbuf-1.9-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 831116] Review Request: ghc-MonadRandom - A random number generation Monad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831116 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-09-17 13:29:42 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-MonadRandom-0.1.6-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 797418] Review Request: qtractor - Audio/MIDI multi-track sequencer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797418 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-09-17 13:31:40 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System --- qtractor-0.5.5-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 850750] Review Request: python-warlock - Python object model built on top of JSON schema
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850750 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- python-warlock-0.4.0-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847604] Review Request: libmatekbd - A keyboard configuration library for MATE Desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847604 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-09-17 13:33:07 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System --- libmatekbd-1.4.0-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 831116] Review Request: ghc-MonadRandom - A random number generation Monad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831116 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-MonadRandom-0.1.6-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 852543] Review Request: zlib-ada - an Ada binding to Zlib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852543 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-09-17 13:35:26 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- zlib-ada-1.4-0.3.20120830CVS.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 846562] Review Request: nqp - Not Quite Perl (6)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846562 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-09-17 13:35:57 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System --- nqp-0.0.2012.08.1-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 824218] Review Request: polly - twitter client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824218 --- Comment #5 from Mario Blättermann --- (In reply to comment #3) > For updating the icon cache, a scriptlet is mandatory: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 851747] Review Request: mediawiki-intersection - Create a list of pages that are listed in a set of categories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851747 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- mediawiki-intersection-37906-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848353] Review Request: python-pthreading - Re-implement threading.Lock, RLock and Condition with libpthread
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848353 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-09-17 13:39:37 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- python-pthreading-0.1.1-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 852543] Review Request: zlib-ada - an Ada binding to Zlib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852543 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- zlib-ada-1.4-0.3.20120830CVS.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 853686] Review Request: erlang-bear - A set of statistics functions for erlang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853686 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-09-17 13:41:22 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- erlang-bear-0.1.1-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844173] Review Request: emacs-evil - Extensible vi layer for Emacs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844173 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- emacs-evil-0.1-0.3.20120902gitc13b90e.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828720] Review Request: brainfuck - An interpreter of the brainf*ck language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828720 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-09-17 13:44:04 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- brainfuck-0.1-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 853380] Review Request: perl-Net-Appliance-Session - Run command-line sessions to network appliances
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853380 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-09-17 13:44:15 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Log-Dispatch-Configurator-Any-1.110690-5.fc17, perl-Net-Appliance-Session-3.122100-2.fc17, perl-Net-CLI-Interact-1.122100-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 853379] Review Request: perl-Net-CLI-Interact - Toolkit for CLI Automation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853379 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-09-17 13:44:21 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Log-Dispatch-Configurator-Any-1.110690-5.fc17, perl-Net-Appliance-Session-3.122100-2.fc17, perl-Net-CLI-Interact-1.122100-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 853378] Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-Configurator-Any - Configurator implementation with Config::Any
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853378 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-09-17 13:44:27 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Log-Dispatch-Configurator-Any-1.110690-5.fc17, perl-Net-Appliance-Session-3.122100-2.fc17, perl-Net-CLI-Interact-1.122100-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832830] Review Request: php-channel-pirum - Adds pear.pirum-project.org channel to PEAR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832830 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- php-channel-pirum-1.0-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 850489] Review Request: ghc-HSH - Haskell HSH library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850489 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-09-17 13:48:10 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-HSH-2.0.4-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857639] Review Request: duff - Quickly find duplicate files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639
--- Comment #5 from Luis Bazan ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
C/C++
[x]: MUST Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[ ]: MUST Package does not contain kernel modules.
[ ]: MUST Package contains no static executables.
[x]: MUST Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic
[x]: EXTRA Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: EXTRA Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
[ ]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one supported primary architecture.
[ ]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[ ]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[ ]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[ ]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[ ]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[ ]: MUST Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[ ]: MUST Development files must be in a -devel package
[ ]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[ ]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[ ]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[ ]: MUST Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[ ]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[ ]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"BSD (2 clause)", "GPL (v3 or later)", "zlib/libpng" For detailed output
of licensecheck see file:
/home/soporte/rpmbuild/SPECS/857639-duff/licensecheck.txt
[ ]: MUST The spec file handles locales properly.
[ ]: MUST Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: MUST Package is named using only allowed ascii characters.
[ ]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[ ]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
Note: Package contains no Conflicts: tag(s)
[ ]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[ ]: MUST If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[ ]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[ ]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[ ]: MUST Package is not relocatable.
[ ]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: MUST Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[ ]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[ ]: MUST Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[ ]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[!]: SHOULD Buildroot is not present
Note: Buildroot is not needed unless packager plans to package for EPEL5
[x]: SHOULD Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[ ]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
/usr/sbin.
[ ]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
--requires).
[ ]: SHOULD Package functions as described.
[ ]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged.
[ ]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from
upstream
[Bug 821094] Review Request: scamper - A network measurement tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821094 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-09-17 13:50:10 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- scamper-0-0.3.20111202c.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 850489] Review Request: ghc-HSH - Haskell HSH library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850489 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-HSH-2.0.4-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 798200] Review Request: dbus-tools - DBus developer tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798200 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- dbus-tools-0-0.1.20120227svn.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847901] Review Request: spamprobe - A Bayesian spam filter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847901 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- spamprobe-1.4d-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844173] Review Request: emacs-evil - Extensible vi layer for Emacs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844173 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- emacs-evil-0.1-0.3.20120902gitc13b90e.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 833622] Review Request: mingw-gmp - Cross-compiled GNU arbitrary precision library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833622 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-09-17 13:54:54 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System --- mingw-gmp-5.0.2-4.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847901] Review Request: spamprobe - A Bayesian spam filter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847901 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System --- spamprobe-1.4d-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 798200] Review Request: dbus-tools - DBus developer tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798200 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- dbus-tools-0-0.1.20120227svn.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857639] Review Request: duff - Quickly find duplicate files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639 --- Comment #6 from Luis Bazan --- # rpmlint -v duff-0.5.2-3.fc17.src.rpm duff.src: I: checking duff.src: I: checking-url http://duff.sourceforge.net/ (timeout 10 seconds) duff.src: I: checking-url http://sourceforge.net/projects/duff/files/duff/0.5.2/duff-0.5.2.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. For me everything is ready and corrected what was requested and passed all tests. APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857639] Review Request: duff - Quickly find duplicate files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639 Luis Bazan changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bazanlui...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857639] Review Request: duff - Quickly find duplicate files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639 Luis Bazan changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857639] Review Request: duff - Quickly find duplicate files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639 Luis Bazan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 853380] Review Request: perl-Net-Appliance-Session - Run command-line sessions to network appliances
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853380 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Log-Dispatch-Configurator-Any-1.110690-5.fc16, perl-Net-Appliance-Session-3.122100-2.fc16, perl-Net-CLI-Interact-1.122100-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 853379] Review Request: perl-Net-CLI-Interact - Toolkit for CLI Automation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853379 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Log-Dispatch-Configurator-Any-1.110690-5.fc16, perl-Net-Appliance-Session-3.122100-2.fc16, perl-Net-CLI-Interact-1.122100-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 853378] Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-Configurator-Any - Configurator implementation with Config::Any
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853378 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Log-Dispatch-Configurator-Any-1.110690-5.fc16, perl-Net-Appliance-Session-3.122100-2.fc16, perl-Net-CLI-Interact-1.122100-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
