[Bug 806117] Review Request: Oplop - Generate account passwords based on account nicknames
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806117
--- Comment #7 from Mario Blättermann ---
Release:1%{?dist}.2
This is wrong, it is only applicable in some special cases [1]. Each time you
change something in your spec, you have to bump the release tag. But this
doesn't mean, you have to add a number after, rather you have to bump the first
number:
Release:2%{?dist}
See [2] for more information.
[1]
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Minor_release_bumps_for_old_branches
[2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Release_Tag
BTW, your srpm download link from comment #4 doesn't point to the newest
version. It is
http://potty.fedorapeople.org/Oplop/1.6-1/Oplop-1.6-1.fc17.2.src.rpm. Please
check the links once you have build a new srpm.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 859675] Review Request: wcd - chdir for DOS and Unix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859675
Eduardo Echeverria changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||echevemas...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Eduardo Echeverria ---
Hi Erwin
I'm not sponsor
This is a informal review
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
C/C++
[x]: MUST Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[ ]: MUST Package does not contain kernel modules.
[ ]: MUST Package contains no static executables.
[x]: MUST Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic
[x]: EXTRA Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: EXTRA Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
[ ]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one supported primary architecture.
[ ]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[!]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
Note: These BR are not needed: sed
[ ]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[ ]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[ ]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[ ]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[ ]: MUST Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[ ]: MUST Development files must be in a -devel package
[ ]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[ ]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[ ]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[ ]: MUST Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[!]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
Note: Found : Packager: Erwin Waterlander
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[ ]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[ ]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"GPL", "GPL (v2 or later)" For detailed output of licensecheck see file:
/home/makerpm/859675-wcd/licensecheck.txt
[ ]: MUST The spec file handles locales properly.
[ ]: MUST Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: MUST Package is named using only allowed ascii characters.
[ ]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[ ]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
Note: Package contains no Conflicts: tag(s)
[ ]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[ ]: MUST If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[ ]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[ ]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[ ]: MUST Package is not relocatable.
[ ]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: MUST Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[ ]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[ ]: MUST Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[ ]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: SHOULD Buildroot is not present
Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine
[!]: SHOULD Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: Clean is needed only if supporting EPEL5
[ ]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist ta
[Bug 859675] Review Request: wcd - chdir for DOS and Unix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859675 --- Comment #2 from Eduardo Echeverria --- Every time you make a version of the spec, paste the output of rpmlint -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 859671] Review Request: opencpn - A free and open source software for marine navigation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859671
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||volke...@gmx.at
--- Comment #2 from Volker Fröhlich ---
BR gpsd and tinyxml.
The license is not GPLv2, but GPLv2+ at least. Run the licensecheck program on
the files. It will also help you in the following:
The project seems to borrow code from various libraries. Among them:
- wxjson
- gdal
- jeeps (That one's OK, as far as I remember. Upstream is dead for ages.)
I believe parts of grib and nmea are included as well.
Please delete this code in the prep section and make the software use the
system-wide libraries instead. Also delete the tinyxml code.
rpm-build should not be listed as a BR. It's not necessary to do so. Requires:
gcc-c++ is likely unnecessary as well, but I haven't tested it.
Please drop the license part from the description. I consider that redundant.
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in the install is obsolete.
You can use "%{_defaultdocdir}" instead of "%{_datadir}/doc/".
Use the version macro in Source0 and %setup, as well as in your sed
invocations.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858106] Review Request: python-rospkg - Utilities for ROS package, stack, and distribution information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858106 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Hi Rich, Looks good. Please do file a bug asking upstream to add a LICENSE file. XXX APPROVED XXX Thanks, Warm regards, Ankur -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 859700] New: Review Request: jnati - Java Native Execution Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859700 Bug ID: 859700 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: jnati - Java Native Execution Framework Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: punto...@libero.it Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jnati.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jnati-0.4-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: A toolkit for working with native, non-Java, programs and libraries from within Java. Fedora Account System Username: gil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 859701] New: Review Request: jni-inchi - JNI InChI Wrapper for the InChI C library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859701 Bug ID: 859701 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: jni-inchi - JNI InChI Wrapper for the InChI C library Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: punto...@libero.it Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jni-inchi.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jni-inchi-0.8-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: JNI-InChI provides JNI (Java Native Interface) wrappers for the InChI (International Chemical Identifier) C library distributed by IUPAC. Fedora Account System Username: gil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 859701] Review Request: jni-inchi - JNI InChI Wrapper for the InChI C library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859701 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||859700 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 859700] Review Request: jnati - Java Native Execution Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859700 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||859701 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858998] wxsqlite3 - C++ wrapper around the SQLite 3.x database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858998 --- Comment #2 from Ivan Romanov --- $ rpmbuild -bb wxsqlite3.spec ... configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --disable-static ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858998] wxsqlite3 - C++ wrapper around the SQLite 3.x database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858998 --- Comment #3 from MartinKG --- Spec URL: https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/guayadeque/wxsqlite3-3.0.0.1-2/wxsqlite3.spec?a=oftqFDbjOLM SRPM URL: https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/guayadeque/wxsqlite3-3.0.0.1-2/wxsqlite3-3.0.0.1-2.fc17.src.rpm?a=8MN0iCM94MY %changelog * Sun Sep 23 2012 Martin Gansser 3.0.0.1-2 - removed unrecognized configure options -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 859711] New: Review Request: jruby-maven-plugins - JRuby Maven Mojos
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859711 Bug ID: 859711 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: jruby-maven-plugins - JRuby Maven Mojos Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: punto...@libero.it Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jruby-maven-plugins.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jruby-maven-plugins-0.28.3-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: Aggregation project for various jruby related maven plugins. Fedora Account System Username: gil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 859711] Review Request: jruby-maven-plugins - JRuby Maven Mojos
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859711 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||855331 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 855331] Review Request: polyglot-maven - Modules to enable Maven usage in others JVM languages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855331 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Depends On||859711 --- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo --- Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/polyglot-maven/2/polyglot-maven.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/polyglot-maven/2/polyglot-maven-0.8-2.fc16.src.rpm - enable jruby module -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858998] wxsqlite3 - C++ wrapper around the SQLite 3.x database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858998 Dan Horák changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d...@danny.cz --- Comment #4 from Dan Horák --- One note - because wxsqlite doesn't maintain any API/ABI stability across its releases, the soname of the library should be modified so it includes the library version. It will allow to detect the incompatibility also on the rpm level. In the currect state wxsqlite can be simply upgraded to a new version and the applications linked to it will crash more or less randomly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 859713] New: Review Request: php-cloudfiles - PHP API for the Cloud Files storage system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859713 Bug ID: 859713 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: php-cloudfiles - PHP API for the Cloud Files storage system Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: gre...@freenet.de Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://brummbq.fedorapeople.org/php-cloudfiles.spec SRPM URL: http://brummbq.fedorapeople.org/php-cloudfiles-1.7.11-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: PHP bindings for the Rackspace Cloud Files RESTful API. Features: * Enable your application to upload files programmatically * Enable Cloud Files CDN integration on any container for public distribution * Create Containers programmatically * Retrieve lists of containers and files Fedora Account System Username: brummbq -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858841] Review Request: owncloud - Private file sync and share server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858841 Gregor Tätzner changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||859713 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 859713] Review Request: php-cloudfiles - PHP API for the Cloud Files storage system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859713 Gregor Tätzner changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||858841 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 856114] Review Request: qxmpp - Qt XMPP Libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856114 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu Flags|fedora-review? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 856114] Review Request: qxmpp - Qt XMPP Libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856114 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rdie...@math.unl.edu Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter --- I can review this later today -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 859711] Review Request: jruby-maven-plugins - JRuby Maven Mojos
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859711 --- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo --- tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4517383 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 855331] Review Request: polyglot-maven - Modules to enable Maven usage in others JVM languages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855331 --- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo --- Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/polyglot-maven/3/polyglot-maven.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/polyglot-maven/3/polyglot-maven-0.8-3.fc16.src.rpm - removed non free pmaven-commands from source package - disabled temporarily jruby module for test gmaven changes (koji build problems) tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4517423 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 856554] Review Request: python-pottymouth - Transform unstructured, untrusted text to safe, valid XHTML
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856554 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Fixed FAS name for Mario -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844775] Review Request: python-django-dynamite, Dynamic models framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844775 --- Comment #4 from Luis Bazan --- SPEC: http://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/python-django-dynamite.spec SRPM: http://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/python-django-dynamite-0.4.1-5.fc17.src.rpm Best Regards!! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830784] Review Request: leiningen - Clojure project automation tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830784 Michael Scherer changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags|needinfo?(m...@zarb.org)| Flags|needinfo?(m...@zarb.org)| Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Michael Scherer --- If it build, then that should be ok. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 859731] New: Review Request: php-channel-sabredav - adds the SabreDAV channel to php-pear
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859731 Bug ID: 859731 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: php-channel-sabredav - adds the SabreDAV channel to php-pear Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: jmarr...@gmail.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://jmarrero.fedorapeople.org/packages/owncloud-deps/php-channel-sabredav/php-channel-sabredav.spec SRPM URL: http://jmarrero.fedorapeople.org/packages/owncloud-deps/php-channel-sabredav/php-channel-sabredav-1.3-2.fc17.src.rpm Description: This package adds the SabreDAV channel which allows PEAR packages from this channel to be installed. Fedora Account System Username:jmarrero -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 859731] Review Request: php-channel-sabredav - adds the SabreDAV channel to php-pear
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859731 --- Comment #1 from Joseph Marrero --- Successful Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4517570 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 856002] Review Request: plug - Linux software for Fender Mustang amplifiers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856002 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Underwood --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~jgu/plug.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~jgu/plug-1.1-4.fc17.src.rpm * Sun Sep 23 2012 Jonathan G. Underwood - 1.1-4 - Remove BuildRequires for gcc-c++ - Use pkgconfig style BuildRequires for qt-devel -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858998] wxsqlite3 - C++ wrapper around the SQLite 3.x database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858998
--- Comment #5 from Ivan Romanov ---
You should use %{_isa} for Requires: field.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#RequiringBasePackage
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844775] Review Request: python-django-dynamite, Dynamic models framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844775
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
||m
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Mario Blättermann ---
Scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4517606
$ rpmlint -i -v *
python-django-dynamite.src: I: checking
python-django-dynamite.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Thx -> Th,
Tex, Thu
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python-django-dynamite.src: I: checking-url
http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/d/django-dynamite/ (timeout 10 seconds)
python-django-dynamite.src: I: checking-url
http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/d/django-dynamite/django-dynamite-0.4.1.tar.gz
(timeout 10 seconds)
python-django-dynamite.noarch: I: checking
python-django-dynamite.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Thx ->
Th, Tex, Thu
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python-django-dynamite.noarch: I: checking-url
http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/d/django-dynamite/ (timeout 10 seconds)
python-django-dynamite.noarch: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
python-django-dynamite.spec: I: checking-url
http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/d/django-dynamite/django-dynamite-0.4.1.tar.gz
(timeout 10 seconds)
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
Nothing of interest so far.
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
ASL 2.0
[.] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[.] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it
is used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream URL can be
specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to
deal with this.
$ sha256sum *
6aba75a2622f2a9be5996acb24a756c42caa5bcacf75c7f5939c2020ccfdc11a
django-dynamite-0.4.1.tar.gz
6aba75a2622f2a9be5996acb24a756c42caa5bcacf75c7f5939c2020ccfdc11a
django-dynamite-0.4.1.tar.gz.orig
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line.
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for
any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
[.] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a f
[Bug 858841] Review Request: owncloud - Private file sync and share server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858841 Gregor Tätzner changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||859740 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858106] Review Request: python-rospkg - Utilities for ROS package, stack, and distribution information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858106 Rich Mattes changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Rich Mattes --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-rospkg Short Description: Utilities for ROS package, stack, and distribution information Owners: rmattes Branches: f17 f18 el6 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805666] Review Request: lldpd - Link Layer Discovery Protocol Daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805666 Volker Fröhlich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #10 from Volker Fröhlich --- Any news here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854062] Review Request: mediawiki119-intersection - Create a list of pages that are listed in a set of categories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854062 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-09-23 14:28:16 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- mediawiki119-intersection-37906-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 853380] Review Request: perl-Net-Appliance-Session - Run command-line sessions to network appliances
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853380 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Log-Dispatch-Configurator-Any-1.110690-5.el6, perl-Net-Appliance-Session-3.122100-2.el6, perl-Net-CLI-Interact-1.122100-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 853379] Review Request: perl-Net-CLI-Interact - Toolkit for CLI Automation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853379 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Log-Dispatch-Configurator-Any-1.110690-5.el6, perl-Net-Appliance-Session-3.122100-2.el6, perl-Net-CLI-Interact-1.122100-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 853378] Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-Configurator-Any - Configurator implementation with Config::Any
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853378 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Log-Dispatch-Configurator-Any-1.110690-5.el6, perl-Net-Appliance-Session-3.122100-2.el6, perl-Net-CLI-Interact-1.122100-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847406] Review Request: clean-extra-utils - A collection of extra libraries and utilities for the Clean programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847406 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- clean-extra-utils-0.1-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847406] Review Request: clean-extra-utils - A collection of extra libraries and utilities for the Clean programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847406 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- clean-extra-utils-0.1-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 856554] Review Request: python-pottymouth - Transform unstructured, untrusted text to safe, valid XHTML
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856554 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 856554] Review Request: python-pottymouth - Transform unstructured, untrusted text to safe, valid XHTML
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856554 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- python-pottymouth-2.2.1-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-pottymouth-2.2.1-3.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 856554] Review Request: python-pottymouth - Transform unstructured, untrusted text to safe, valid XHTML
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856554 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- python-pottymouth-2.2.1-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-pottymouth-2.2.1-3.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 856554] Review Request: python-pottymouth - Transform unstructured, untrusted text to safe, valid XHTML
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856554 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- python-pottymouth-2.2.1-3.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-pottymouth-2.2.1-3.fc16 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 859675] Review Request: wcd - chdir for DOS and Unix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859675 --- Comment #3 from Erwin Waterlander --- Hi, thanks. I have uploaded a new spec and rpm file (same location). %changelog * Sun Sep 23 2012 Erwin Waterlander - 5.2.2 - Removed tag Packager. - Removed Buildrequires sed. - Changed License tag from GPL to GPLv2 [root@localhost wcd]# rpmlint -v wcd.spec wcd.spec: I: checking-url http://waterlan.home.xs4all.nl/wcd-5.2.2-src.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [root@localhost wcd]# rpmlint -v wcd-5.2.2-1.fc17.src.rpm wcd.src: I: checking wcd.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) chdir -> chair, choir wcd.src: W: summary-not-capitalized C chdir for DOS and Unix wcd.src: I: checking-url http://waterlan.home.xs4all.nl/ (timeout 10 seconds) wcd.src: I: checking-url http://waterlan.home.xs4all.nl/wcd-5.2.2-src.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. best regards, Erwin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 859675] Review Request: wcd - chdir for DOS and Unix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859675
--- Comment #4 from Eduardo Echeverria ---
Hi Erwin
Fix this
Increment Release Release: 1%{?dist} to Release: 2%{?dist}
In the section Changelog increment the number release whenever you make a
change
Example 5.2.2-2,
In SRPMS
[!]: SHOULD Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: Clean is needed only if supporting EPEL5
wcd.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/wcd.csh
wcd.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/wcd.sh
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ParagNemade/CommonRpmlintErrors#non-conffile-in-etc
add %config in %files
==
wcd.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary wcd.exe
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Man_pages
easy job because you are the developer
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847268] Review Request: girara - Simple user interface library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847268 François Cami changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2012-09-23 16:17:04 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 859675] Review Request: wcd - chdir for DOS and Unix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859675 --- Comment #5 from Eduardo Echeverria --- Hi again Erwin, The debuginfo package contains c3po you'll have to pack http://sourceforge.net/projects/c3po/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 855331] Review Request: polyglot-maven - Modules to enable Maven usage in others JVM languages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855331 --- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo --- Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/polyglot-maven/3/polyglot-maven.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/polyglot-maven/3/polyglot-maven-0.8-0.8-0.3.20120923.fc16.src.rpm - corrected release tag - enabled cli and jruby module -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 859675] Review Request: wcd - chdir for DOS and Unix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859675 --- Comment #6 from Erwin Waterlander --- Hi Eduardo, New files Spec URL: http://waterlan.home.xs4all.nl/fedora/wcd.spec SRPM URL: http://waterlan.home.xs4all.nl/fedora/wcd-5.2.2-3.fc17.src.rpm Increased release number. I don't understand why there is a warning that there is no %clean section, because there is a %clean section in the spec file present. Wcd does not depend on any c3po libraries. Wcd includes source code that has been generated with c3po. regards, Erwin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 859675] Review Request: wcd - chdir for DOS and Unix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859675 --- Comment #7 from Eduardo Echeverria --- Hi Erwin Remove %clean this => rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT this is needed only if supporting EPEL5 and this warning wcd.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/wcd.csh wcd.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/wcd.sh https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ParagNemade/CommonRpmlintErrors#non-conffile-in-etc and the man-pages is needed Best Regards -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847794] Review Request: gl3n An OpenGL Mathematics library for D
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847794 --- Comment #5 from Paul Wouters --- I think you might have uploaded the old spec? eg it does not address the requires for the -devel package on /usr/include/d ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 813842] Review Request: glfw , A cross-platform multimedia library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=813842 --- Comment #21 from Paul Wouters --- Is this a pre-release of 3.0? As I don't see tar balls for the 3.0 version? If so, the version shule be 3.0-0.6-1 ? Other then that ,as said it is approved now, so you can request the CVS flag -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847794] Review Request: gl3n An OpenGL Mathematics library for D
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847794 --- Comment #6 from MERCIER Jonathan --- /usr/include/d should be own by ldc the compiler but i look ig gdc ( gcc D compiler) wiill come into fedora in this case /usr/include/d should not be own by ldc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 813842] Review Request: glfw , A cross-platform multimedia library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=813842
--- Comment #22 from MERCIER Jonathan ---
using
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages
snapshot format is ok ?
%global snapdate 20120812
%global glfw_revisiona9ed5b1
%global alphatag %{snapdate}git%{glfw_revision}
...
Release:6.%{alphatag}%
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858106] Review Request: python-rospkg - Utilities for ROS package, stack, and distribution information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858106 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844775] Review Request: python-django-dynamite, Dynamic models framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844775 --- Comment #6 from Luis Bazan --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-django-dynamite Short Description: Dynamic models framework Owners: lbazan Branches: f17 f18 el6 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844775] Review Request: python-django-dynamite, Dynamic models framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844775 Luis Bazan changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 855701] Review Request: cabal-rpm - creates rpm spec files for Haskell Cabal packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855701 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- cabal-rpm-0.6.2-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cabal-rpm-0.6.2-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844775] Review Request: python-django-dynamite, Dynamic models framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844775 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858380] Review Request: Gluegen2 - Java/JNI glue code generator to call out to ANSI C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858380 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 820115] Review Request: leptonica - C library for efficient image processing and image analysis operations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820115 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-09-23 23:20:44 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- leptonica-1.69-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857193] Review Request: activemq - Open source messaging and Integration Patterns server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857193 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-09-23 23:22:30 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- activemq-5.6.0-3.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 841833] Review Request: gmaven - Integration of Groovy into Maven
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841833 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-09-23 23:25:04 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- gmaven-1.4-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 799521] Review Request: azove - Another Zero-One Vertex Enumeration tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799521 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-09-23 23:25:31 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- azove-2.0-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 859795] New: Review Request: sha - File hashing utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859795 Bug ID: 859795 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: sha - File hashing utility Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: echevemas...@gmail.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://echevemaster.fedorapeople.org/sha/sha.spec RPMS URL: http://echevemaster.fedorapeople.org/sha/sha-1.0.4a-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: file hashing utility that uses the SHA-1, SHA-256, SHA-384, & SHA-512 hash algorithms. It can be used for file integrity checking, remote file comparisons, etc. The portable algorithm implementations can be useful in other projects too Fedora Account System Username: echevemaster # rpmlint SRPMS ## rpmlint -v sha-1.0.4a-1.fc17.src.rpm sha.src: I: checking sha.src: I: checking-url http://hg.saddi.com/sha-asaddi (timeout 10 seconds) sha.src: I: checking-url http://www.saddi.com/software/sha/dist/sha-1.0.4a.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # rpmlint RPMS ## rpmlint -v sha-1.0.4a-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm sha.x86_64: I: checking sha.x86_64: I: checking-url http://hg.saddi.com/sha-asaddi (timeout 10 seconds) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Koji Build Rawhide http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4518964 Koji Build F18 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4518980 Koji Build f17 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4518977 Koji Build F16 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4518971 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857639] Review Request: duff - Quickly find duplicate files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639 Eduardo Echeverria changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||859795 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 859795] Review Request: sha - File hashing utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859795 Eduardo Echeverria changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||857639 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857639] Review Request: duff - Quickly find duplicate files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857639 --- Comment #11 from Eduardo Echeverria --- Toshio, Luis I contacted to Allan Saddi (shaX-asaddi) and provided me the necessary source for building shared libraries for duff, now need to do the necessary changes to link against it Sha is in BZ 859795 Regards -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747031] Review Request: ghc-hs-bibutils - Haskell bindings to bibutils, the bibliography conversion utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747031 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|peter...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flags|fedora-review? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 818547] Review Request: python-versiontools - Smart replacement for plain tuple used in __version__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818547 Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ | Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda --- Package Change Request == Package Name: python-versiontools New Branches: el6 Owners: bkabrda mrunge InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 783073] Review Request: vishnu - DIET add-on packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783073 --- Comment #3 from Haïkel Guémar --- i need to update the package to latest version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 859819] New: Review Request: alms-mongolian-title-fonts - Mongolian Title font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859819 Bug ID: 859819 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: alms-mongolian-title-fonts - Mongolian Title font Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: pnem...@redhat.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/alms-mongolian-title-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/alms-mongolian-title-fonts-1.0-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Mongolian Title font Fedora Account System Username: pnemade -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858613] Review Request: ceelog - Tool for receiving, filtering and searching CEE/Lumberjack logs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858613 --- Comment #3 from Milan Bartos --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ceelog Short Description: Tool for receiving, filtering and searching CEE/Lumberjack logs Owners: mbartos Branches: f17 f18 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
