[Bug 858613] Review Request: ceelog - Tool for receiving, filtering and searching CEE/Lumberjack logs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858613 Milan Bartos changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847182] Review Request: nhn-nanum-gothic-light-fonts - Nanum Gothic Light family of Korean TrueType fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847182 anish changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|apa...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847182] Review Request: nhn-nanum-gothic-light-fonts - Nanum Gothic Light family of Korean TrueType fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847182 Daiki Ueno changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2012-09-24 03:39:53 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 718317] Review Request: asforza4 - 4-in-a-row in a dockapp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718317
--- Comment #10 from Matthias Runge ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
C/C++
[x]: MUST Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: MUST Package does not contain kernel modules.
[!]: MUST Package contains no static executables.
[x]: MUST Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic
[x]: EXTRA Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: EXTRA Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one supported primary architecture.
[x]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[!]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[!]: MUST Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: MUST Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[!]: MUST Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[-]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)" For detailed output of
licensecheck see file:
/home/mrunge/review/718317-asforza4/licensecheck.txt
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: MUST Package is named using only allowed ascii characters.
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
Note: Package contains no Conflicts: tag(s)
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: MUST If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Package is not relocatable.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: MUST Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[-]: MUST Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: SHOULD Buildroot is not present
Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine
[x]: SHOULD Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[x]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
/usr/sbin.
[x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
--requires).
[?]: SHOULD Package functions as described.
[x]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged.
[x]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from
upstream.
[-]: SHOULD Pat
[Bug 854596] Review Request: perl-LWP-Authen-Negotiate - GSSAPI based Authentication Plugin for LWP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854596 Steve Traylen changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Steve Traylen --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-LWP-Authen-Negotiate Short Description: GSSAPI based Authentication Plugin for LWP Owners: stevetraylen Branches: f17 f18 el6 el5 InitialCC: perl-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854596] Review Request: perl-LWP-Authen-Negotiate - GSSAPI based Authentication Plugin for LWP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854596 Steve Traylen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 856545] Review Request: amqpclt - Versatile AMQP client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856545
Eduardo Echeverria changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||echevemas...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Eduardo Echeverria ---
Hi Massimo
Initial Comments
[!]: MUST Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
Note: Using both %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#macros
Regards
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854256] Review Request: tipcutils - Utils package required to configure TIPC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854256 --- Comment #3 from Erik Hugne --- The srpm/spec links still from the first request still apply: Spec URL: http://marvin.hb0da.org/~dev/tipcutils.spec SRPM URL: http://marvin.hb0da.org/~dev/tipcutils-2.0.3-0.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 856545] Review Request: amqpclt - Versatile AMQP client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856545 --- Comment #2 from Eduardo Echeverria --- Hi again And rename the package to python-amqpclt http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/PythonNamingDependingOnImplementation -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 718317] Review Request: asforza4 - 4-in-a-row in a dockapp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718317 --- Comment #11 from Mario Blättermann --- (In reply to comment #10) > You must get rid of forza44as: > [mrunge@turing asforza4]$ ldd forza44as > not a dynamic executable > forza44as: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), statically > linked, for GNU/Linux 2.4.0, > BuildID[sha1]=0x223a1cf33848be10ee008bf3e0469a8312cd103a, stripped This is the CPU player of asforza4. Without that, the game would become almost unusable, it would be no longer possible to play against the computer, only human versus human. But the forza44as binary is built with Fedora's Pascal compiler, it is not bundled with the sources. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 856545] Review Request: amqpclt - Versatile AMQP client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856545 --- Comment #3 from Massimo Paladin --- Hi Eduardo, thanks for your comments, I will make first change and be coherent with macros. About the second comment the status is: Targeted release: Fedora 19 Last updated: 2012-08-22 Percentage of completion: 00% Is that confirmed? If it will be confirmed I will rename it as even if the package doesn't deploy any python module it is implementation dependant. Regards -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 856545] Review Request: amqpclt - Versatile AMQP client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856545
--- Comment #4 from Eduardo Echeverria ---
Hi Massimo
You can just do this:
%global pkgname amqpclt
Name:python-amqpclt
URL:http://mpaladin.web.cern.ch/mpaladin/python/amqpclt/
Source0:
http://mpaladin.web.cern.ch/mpaladin/python/%{pkgname}/%{pkgname}-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildRoot:%{_tmppath}/%{pkgname}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
%setup -q -n %{pkgname}-%{version}
and rename your spec python-amqpclt.spec
Regards
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 856545] Review Request: amqpclt - Versatile AMQP client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856545 --- Comment #5 from Eduardo Echeverria --- Paste rpmlint output of srpms and rpms and tries to build scratch in Koji -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 859893] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Type - Functions to validate data types in test files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859893 Bug ID: 859893 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Type - Functions to validate data types in test files Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: emman...@seyman.fr Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Test-Type/perl-Test-Type.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Test-Type/perl-Test-Type-1.1.0-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: The Test::Type module provides functions that allow you to validate data types in test files. Fedora Account System Username: eseyman -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 859894] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Dist-VersionSync - Verify that all the modules in a distribution have the same version number
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859894 Bug ID: 859894 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Dist-VersionSync - Verify that all the modules in a distribution have the same version number Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: emman...@seyman.fr Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Test-Dist-VersionSync/perl-Test-Dist-VersionSync.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Test-Dist-VersionSync/perl-Test-Dist-VersionSync-1.1.0-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: The Test-Dist-VersionSync gives perl developers an easy way to verify that all the modules in a distribution have the same version number. Fedora Account System Username: eseyman -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854690] Review Request: python-dslib - A Python library for accessing Czech Databox (Datové schránky)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854690 Jan Synacek changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jan Synacek --- I can see no other problems. Approving. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 856153] Review Request: python-django-openstack-auth - Django authentication backend for OpenStack Keystone
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856153 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- python-django-openstack-auth-1.0.2-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-django-openstack-auth-1.0.2-2.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 859914] New: Rename Review Request: lato-fonts - A sanserif typeface family
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859914
Bug ID: 859914
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
Summary: Rename Review Request: lato-fonts - A sanserif
typeface family
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Linux
Reporter: pikachu.2...@gmail.com
Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Hardware: All
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Product: Fedora
Spec URL:
http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/lato-fonts/lato-fonts.spec
SRPM URL:
http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/lato-fonts/lato-fonts-1.014-1.fc18.src.rpm
Description:
Lato is a sanserif typeface family designed in the Summer 2010 by Warsaw-based
designer Łukasz Dziedzic ("Lato" means "Summer" in Polish). In December 2010
the
Lato family was published under the open-source Open Font License by his
foundry
tyPoland, with support from Google.
Fedora Account System Username: melmorabity
This package replaces the currently available google-lato-fonts package. Since
the Lato font family is now distributed outside the Google Font website
(http://www.latofonts.com/), there's no more reason to keep "google" as the
font foundry in the package name.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854553] Review Request: gr-air-modes - SDR receiver for Mode S transponder signals (ADS-B)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854553 Jan Synacek changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(jskarvad@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #3 from Jan Synacek --- I also noticed that there is a 'docs' folder in the upstream source containing doxygen documentation. Maybe it would be a good idea to package it as well? E.g. as a '-doc' package? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 855666] Review Request: perl-Queue-DBI - A queueing module with an emphasis on safety, using DBI as a storage system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855666 --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman --- I've updated the package. Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Queue-DBI/perl-Queue-DBI.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Queue-DBI/perl-Queue-DBI-2.2.1-1.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 856545] Review Request: amqpclt - Versatile AMQP client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856545 --- Comment #6 from Massimo Paladin --- Spec URL: https://mpaladin.web.cern.ch/mpaladin/rpms/python-amqpclt/python-amqpclt.spec SRPM URL: https://mpaladin.web.cern.ch/mpaladin/rpms/python-amqpclt/python-amqpclt-0.3-2.fc17.src.rpm Description: amqpclt is a versatile tool to interact with messaging brokers speaking AMQP and/or message queues (see messaging.queue) on disk. It receives messages (see messaging.message) from an incoming module, optionally massaging them (i.e. filtering and/or modifying), and sends them to an outgoing module. Depending on which modules are used, the tool can perform different operations. Fedora Account System Username: mpaladin f17 scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4519543 el6 scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4519548 rpmlint is clean. Regards -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854679] Review Request: python-sudsds - A python SOAP client modified for usage with Czech Databox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854679 Jan Synacek changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Jan Synacek --- No other problems that I can see. Approving. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 818547] Review Request: python-versiontools - Smart replacement for plain tuple used in __version__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818547 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854596] Review Request: perl-LWP-Authen-Negotiate - GSSAPI based Authentication Plugin for LWP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854596 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 807810] Review Request: ptpd-phc - Precision Time Protocol daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807810 Josh Boyer changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Josh Boyer --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ptpd-phc Short Description: This is the PTP daemon (PTPd) implementing the Precision Time Protocol (PTP) version 2 Owners: jwboyer Branches: f17 f18 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858613] Review Request: ceelog - Tool for receiving, filtering and searching CEE/Lumberjack logs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858613 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854553] Review Request: gr-air-modes - SDR receiver for Mode S transponder signals (ADS-B)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854553 Jaroslav Škarvada changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(jskarvad@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #4 from Jaroslav Škarvada --- (In reply to comment #3) > I also noticed that there is a 'docs' folder in the upstream source > containing doxygen documentation. Maybe it would be a good idea to package > it as well? E.g. as a '-doc' package? Thanks for the catch, new files: Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~jskarvad/gr-air-modes/gr-air-modes.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~jskarvad/gr-air-modes/gr-air-modes-0-0.3.20120905git6c7a7370.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854679] Review Request: python-sudsds - A python SOAP client modified for usage with Czech Databox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854679 Jaroslav Škarvada changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Jaroslav Škarvada --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-sudsds Short Description: A python SOAP client modified for usage with Czech Databox Owners: jskarvad Branches: f17 f18 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854690] Review Request: python-dslib - A Python library for accessing Czech Databox (Datové schránky)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854690 Jaroslav Škarvada changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jaroslav Škarvada --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-dslib Short Description: A Python library for accessing Czech Databox (Datové schránky) Owners: jskarvad Branches: f17 f18 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 807810] Review Request: ptpd-phc - Precision Time Protocol daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807810 --- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Jon, please take ownership of review BZs, thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854679] Review Request: python-sudsds - A python SOAP client modified for usage with Czech Databox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854679 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854690] Review Request: python-dslib - A Python library for accessing Czech Databox (Datové schránky)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854690 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854553] Review Request: gr-air-modes - SDR receiver for Mode S transponder signals (ADS-B)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854553 Jan Synacek changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Jan Synacek --- Looks ok now, approving. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854553] Review Request: gr-air-modes - SDR receiver for Mode S transponder signals (ADS-B)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854553 Jaroslav Škarvada changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Jaroslav Škarvada --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: gr-air-modes Short Description: SDR receiver for Mode S transponder signals (ADS-B) Owners: jskarvad Branches: f17 f18 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854553] Review Request: gr-air-modes - SDR receiver for Mode S transponder signals (ADS-B)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854553 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 852214] Review Request: overpass-fonts - Typeface based on the U.S. interstate highway road signage type system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852214 --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway --- Fixed Spec URL: http://spot.fedorapeople.org/overpass-fonts.spec Fixed SRPM URL: http://spot.fedorapeople.org/overpass-fonts-1.01-2.fc18.src.rpm I blame senility! :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 807810] Review Request: ptpd-phc - Precision Time Protocol daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807810 Jon Stanley changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jstan...@rmrf.net --- Comment #16 from Jon Stanley --- Oops, forgot to do that. Fixed now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 859994] New: Review Request: rubygem-simple_form - Flexible and powerful components to create forms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859994 Bug ID: 859994 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: rubygem-simple_form - Flexible and powerful components to create forms Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: ifar...@redhat.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/ifarkas/fedora_rpm_specs/master/rubygem-simple_form.spec SRPM URL: https://raw.github.com/ifarkas/fedora_rpm_specs/master/rubygem-simple_form-2.0.2-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: SimpleForm aims to be as flexible as possible while helping you with powerful components to create your forms. The basic goal of SimpleForm is to not touch your way of defining the layout, letting you find the better design for your eyes. Fedora Account System Username: ifarkas -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 859994] Review Request: rubygem-simple_form - Flexible and powerful components to create forms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859994 Imre Farkas changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 860001] New: Review Request: erlang-snappy - An Erlang NIF wrapper for Google's snappy library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860001 Bug ID: 860001 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: erlang-snappy - An Erlang NIF wrapper for Google's snappy library Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: lemen...@gmail.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-snappy.spec SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-snappy-1.0.3-0.1.git80db168.fc19.src.rpm Description: An Erlang NIF wrapper for Google's snappy compressor/decompressor. Fedora Account System Username: peter Koji scratchbuild for Rawhide: * http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4520353 This is one from two libraries bundled within CouchDB. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830784] Review Request: leiningen - Clojure project automation tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830784 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Michel Alexandre Salim --- Super, thanks! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: leiningen Short Description: Clojure project automation tool Owners: salimma Branches: f18 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830784] Review Request: leiningen - Clojure project automation tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830784 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858729] Review Request: libldm - A library and tool for managing Windows dynamic disks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858729 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858729] Review Request: libldm - A library and tool for managing Windows dynamic disks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858729 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- libldm-0.2.3-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libldm-0.2.3-1.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 823352] Review Request: rubygem-chef - a client for the Chef config management system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823352 --- Comment #8 from Matthew Miller --- PS: I do think it'd be useful for package discoverability to have this named "chef-client". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 813842] Review Request: glfw , A cross-platform multimedia library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=813842
--- Comment #23 from Paul Wouters ---
not if 3.0 is a prerelease. You must make sure that 3.0-1 will be "newer" then
any of these pre-release tags. but currently 3.0-1 would be older then
3.0-6.%{alphatag}
so use:
Release: 0.6.%{alphatag}
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 853252] Review Request: datanommer - A storage consumer for the Fedora Message Bus (fedmsg)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853252 --- Comment #8 from Ralph Bean --- Here's a new upstream release that removes the symlink and renames the gpl-3.0.txt to just LICENSE which is the convention used in every other of my projects. This little symlinking experiment seems to have been more trouble than it was worth. :) Spec URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/datanommer.spec SRPM URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/datanommer-0.1.5-1.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844775] Review Request: python-django-dynamite, Dynamic models framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844775 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844775] Review Request: python-django-dynamite, Dynamic models framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844775 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- python-django-dynamite-0.4.1-5.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-django-dynamite-0.4.1-5.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 859675] Review Request: wcd - chdir for DOS and Unix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859675 --- Comment #8 from Erwin Waterlander --- Hi, New files Spec URL: http://waterlan.home.xs4all.nl/fedora/wcd.spec SRPM URL: http://waterlan.home.xs4all.nl/fedora/wcd-5.2.2-4.fc17.src.rpm * Mon Sep 24 2012 Erwin Waterlander - 5.2.2-4 - Summary starts with capital letter C. - Config files marked with config. - Removed clean section (needed only if supporting EPEL5). - Moved man-pages under doc. [root@localhost wcd]# rpmlint -v wcd.spec wcd.spec: I: checking-url http://waterlan.home.xs4all.nl/wcd-5.2.2-src.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [root@localhost wcd]# rpmlint -v wcd.spec wcd-5.2.2-4.fc17.src.rpm wcd.spec: I: checking-url http://waterlan.home.xs4all.nl/wcd-5.2.2-src.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) wcd.src: I: checking wcd.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Chdir -> Chair, Choir wcd.src: I: checking-url http://waterlan.home.xs4all.nl/ (timeout 10 seconds) wcd.src: I: checking-url http://waterlan.home.xs4all.nl/wcd-5.2.2-src.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. regards, Erwin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 859675] Review Request: wcd - chdir for DOS and Unix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859675 --- Comment #9 from Erwin Waterlander --- Hi, About this warning: W: no-manual-page-for-binary wcd.exe. The manual name is 'wcd'. The binary name is 'wcd.exe' to make the distinction with the required alias or function named 'wcd'. Wcd can only function when it is called via an alias or function. Many people in the past have tried to run the binary directly, but this does not work. The alias (for csh) and the function (for bash) are defined in the config files. If you want I can change the .exe suffix into something else (some people are allergic to anything that reminds them of DOS). Eg Debian uses .exec. On Debian the binary is installed under /usr/libexec/, because the packager says you don't execute the binary directly. This is debatable. /usr/libexec is for programs called by programs/scripts, and I don't call an alias a program. best regards, Erwin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844775] Review Request: python-django-dynamite, Dynamic models framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844775 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- python-django-dynamite-0.4.1-5.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-django-dynamite-0.4.1-5.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 856545] Review Request: amqpclt - Versatile AMQP client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856545 --- Comment #7 from Eduardo Echeverria --- no build in el5 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4521145 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 856545] Review Request: amqpclt - Versatile AMQP client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856545 --- Comment #8 from Eduardo Echeverria --- If you're just going to pack for EL6 No differences with Fedora Packaging Guidelines at this time. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834681] Review Request: python-sieve - XML Comparison Utils
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834681 --- Comment #2 from Ralph Bean --- New release removes bundled egg-info in prep section. Spec URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-sieve.spec SRPM URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-sieve-0.1.6-3.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 815982] Review Request: gnome-shell-search-pinboard - Search your pinboard.in tags from the gnome-shell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815982 Ralph Bean changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Ralph Bean --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: gnome-shell-search-pinboard Short Description: Search your pinboard.in tags from the gnome-shell Owners: ralph Branches: f17 f18 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 815982] Review Request: gnome-shell-search-pinboard - Search your pinboard.in tags from the gnome-shell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815982 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 815982] Review Request: gnome-shell-search-pinboard - Search your pinboard.in tags from the gnome-shell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815982 --- Comment #6 from Ralph Bean --- Jon, Mario -- thanks again as always. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844775] Review Request: python-django-dynamite, Dynamic models framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844775 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- python-django-dynamite-0.4.1-5.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854553] Review Request: gr-air-modes - SDR receiver for Mode S transponder signals (ADS-B)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854553 --- Comment #8 from Jaroslav Škarvada --- Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 846346] Review Request: halibut - TeX-like software manual tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846346 --- Comment #5 from Jaroslav Škarvada --- Reply from fedora-legal: > Not MIT, but it is Free and GPL-Compatible. Please use: > > License: MIT and APAFML New files: Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~jskarvad/halibut.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~jskarvad/halibut-1.0-6.20120803svn9601.fc15.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854553] Review Request: gr-air-modes - SDR receiver for Mode S transponder signals (ADS-B)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854553 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854553] Review Request: gr-air-modes - SDR receiver for Mode S transponder signals (ADS-B)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854553 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- gr-air-modes-0-0.3.20120905git6c7a7370.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gr-air-modes-0-0.3.20120905git6c7a7370.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854553] Review Request: gr-air-modes - SDR receiver for Mode S transponder signals (ADS-B)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854553 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- gr-air-modes-0-0.3.20120905git6c7a7370.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gr-air-modes-0-0.3.20120905git6c7a7370.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 856545] Review Request: amqpclt - Versatile AMQP client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856545 --- Comment #9 from Massimo Paladin --- The scratch build for EL5 fails because in EL5 the MD5 is different and the src rpm was built with rpmbuild -bs, if builded with rpmbuild-md5 -bs it would work fine. From normal sources it would just build fine. To check look for MD5 in the mock build log: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1146/4521146/root.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 818401] Review Request: 0ad - Cross-Platform RTS Game of Ancient Warfare
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818401 --- Comment #46 from Miroslav Suchý --- All my comments have been addressed. Approved. But please during every rebase do licence check. APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 818401] Review Request: 0ad - Cross-Platform RTS Game of Ancient Warfare
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818401 Miroslav Suchý changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 846928] Review Request: python-walkdir - Python module to manipulate and filter os.walk() style iteration
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846928 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-09-24 17:32:54 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- python-walkdir-0.3-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 843747] Review Request: python-retask - python module to create and manage distributed task queues.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843747 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- Package python-retask-0.2-1.el6: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=epel-testing python-retask-0.2-1.el6' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-13002/python-retask-0.2-1.el6 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 856545] Review Request: amqpclt - Versatile AMQP client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856545
--- Comment #10 from Eduardo Echeverria ---
Ok, that's right, sorry in the process of renaming the package I said something
wrong
Change this
BuildRoot:%{_tmppath}/%{srcname}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
to
BuildRoot:%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#BuildRoot_tag
I will formal review tonight
Regards
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 856545] Review Request: python-amqpclt - Versatile AMQP client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856545 Eduardo Echeverria changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: amqpclt - |Review Request: |Versatile AMQP client |python-amqpclt - Versatile ||AMQP client -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 823102] Review Request: 0ad-data - The Data Files for 0 AD
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823102 --- Comment #15 from Miroslav Suchý --- ad license location - I was thinking more about CWD=$(cwd) cp art/LICENSE.txt $CWD/LICENSE-art.txt #the same for audio ... and in %files %doc LICENSE-art.txt LICENSE-audio.txt so those LICENSE text are put in /usr/share/doc folder where are usually expected. And marked as doc. Anyway this is just minor suggestion, and not blocker. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 823102] Review Request: 0ad-data - The Data Files for 0 AD
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823102 Miroslav Suchý changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Miroslav Suchý --- APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 818401] Review Request: 0ad - Cross-Platform RTS Game of Ancient Warfare
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818401 --- Comment #47 from pcpa --- (In reply to comment #46) > All my comments have been addressed. Approved. > But please during every rebase do licence check. > > APPROVED Thanks. Ok, I will also make a comment in the spec file about the recomendation to license check on updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 818401] Review Request: 0ad - Cross-Platform RTS Game of Ancient Warfare
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818401 pcpa changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #48 from pcpa --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: 0ad Short Description: Cross-Platform RTS Game of Ancient Warfare Owners: pcpa Branches: f16 f17 f18 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 823102] Review Request: 0ad-data - The Data Files for 0 AD
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823102 --- Comment #17 from pcpa --- (In reply to comment #15) > ad license location - I was thinking more about > CWD=$(cwd) > > cp art/LICENSE.txt $CWD/LICENSE-art.txt > #the same for audio > ... > > and in %files > %doc LICENSE-art.txt LICENSE-audio.txt > > so those LICENSE text are put in /usr/share/doc folder where are usually > expected. > And marked as doc. Anyway this is just minor suggestion, and not blocker. Ok, I will update the spec to rename the LICENSE files and put them in the expected directory. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 823102] Review Request: 0ad-data - The Data Files for 0 AD
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823102 pcpa changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from pcpa --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: 0ad-data Short Description: The Data Files for 0 AD Owners: pcpa Branches: f16 f17 f18 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 759823] Review Request: libkdtree++ - C++ template container implementation of kd-tree sorting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759823
Rich Mattes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|richmat...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #9 from Rich Mattes ---
I don't think the issue was that c++ template header libraries aren't allowed,
I think the contention is just that you should add a Provides:
libkdtree++-static to the -devel package. We do the same thing with eigen2,
eigen3, etc. That way dependent packages can Require: libkdtree++-static,
which implies that any dependent packages will need to be rebuilt when
libkdtree++ is upgraded.
That being said, I'll go ahead and take this review on.
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
C/C++
[x]: MUST Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: MUST Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: MUST Package contains no static executables.
[x]: MUST Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[-]: MUST Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if
present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in non-devel package (fix or
explain):libkdtree++-python-0.7.0-2.fc17.x86_64.rpm :
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/_kdtree.so
Generic
[x]: EXTRA Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: EXTRA Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
-- Artistic 2.0 OK
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one supported primary architecture.
[!]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[-]: MUST Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: MUST Development files must be in a -devel package
[-]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: MUST Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[-]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[!]: MUST License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: MUST Package is named using only allowed ascii characters.
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
Note: Package contains no Conflicts: tag(s)
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: MUST If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Package is not relocatable.
[!]: MUST Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. (EPEL5)
Note: Only applicable for EL-5
[!]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: MUST Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[-]: MUST Package
[Bug 818457] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-debug-base19 - Fast Ruby debugger - core component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818457 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka --- http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/ruby-debug-related/rubygem-ruby-debug-base19.spec http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/ruby-debug-related/rubygem-ruby-debug-base19-0.11.26-2.fc.src.rpm * Fri Sep 14 2012 Mamoru Tasaka - 0.11.26-2 - A bit clean up -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 818458] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-debug19 - Command line interface (CLI) for ruby-debug-base
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818458 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka --- http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/ruby-debug-related/rubygem-ruby-debug19.spec http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/ruby-debug-related/rubygem-ruby-debug19-0.11.6-2.fc.src.rpm * Fri Sep 14 2012 Mamoru Tasaka - 0.11.6-2 - Rebuild -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858106] Review Request: python-rospkg - Utilities for ROS package, stack, and distribution information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858106 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858106] Review Request: python-rospkg - Utilities for ROS package, stack, and distribution information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858106 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- python-rospkg-1.0.6-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-rospkg-1.0.6-2.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 818401] Review Request: 0ad - Cross-Platform RTS Game of Ancient Warfare
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818401 --- Comment #49 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 823102] Review Request: 0ad-data - The Data Files for 0 AD
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823102 --- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847684] Review Request: mate-notification-daemon - Notification daemon for MATE Desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847684 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System --- mate-notification-daemon-1.4.0-8.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mate-notification-daemon-1.4.0-8.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847684] Review Request: mate-notification-daemon - Notification daemon for MATE Desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847684 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System --- mate-notification-daemon-1.4.0-8.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mate-notification-daemon-1.4.0-8.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858729] Review Request: libldm - A library and tool for managing Windows dynamic disks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858729 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- libldm-0.2.3-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 846928] Review Request: python-walkdir - Python module to manipulate and filter os.walk() style iteration
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846928 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- python-walkdir-0.3-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854553] Review Request: gr-air-modes - SDR receiver for Mode S transponder signals (ADS-B)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854553 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- gr-air-modes-0-0.3.20120905git6c7a7370.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 859819] Review Request: alms-mongolian-title-fonts - Mongolian Title font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859819 Akira TAGOH changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ta...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Akira TAGOH --- I'll take a look into it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858106] Review Request: python-rospkg - Utilities for ROS package, stack, and distribution information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858106 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- python-rospkg-1.0.6-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 855283] Review Request: pass - A unix password manager using standard tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855283 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-09-25 02:17:18 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System --- pass-1.2-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 851975] Review Request: libmatecomponentui - Libraries for MATE Desktop ui components
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851975 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-09-25 02:18:36 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- libmatecomponentui-1.4.0-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857309] Review Request: hash-slinger - Generate various DNS records such as RFC-4255 SSHFP and RFC-698 TLSA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857309 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-09-25 02:19:47 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- hash-slinger-2.1-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857524] Review Request: python-django-federated-login - Provides federated logins to django projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857524 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- python-django-federated-login-0.3.0-3.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 856189] Review Request: python-colorama - Cross-platform colored terminal text
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856189 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-09-25 02:20:19 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- python-colorama-0.2.4-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 856111] Review Request: python-django-compressor - Compresses linked and inline JavaScript or CSS into single cached files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856111 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-09-25 02:20:59 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- python-django-compressor-1.2-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 846928] Review Request: python-walkdir - Python module to manipulate and filter os.walk() style iteration
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846928 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- python-walkdir-0.3-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 851702] Review Request: python-acoustid - Python bindings for Chromaprint acoustic fingerprinting and the Acoustid API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851702 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-09-25 02:23:10 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- python-acoustid-0.7-3.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 856175] Review Request: python-nose-xcover - Extends nose.plugins.cover to add Cobertura-style XML reports
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856175 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-09-25 02:24:06 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- python-nose-xcover-1.0.7-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
