[Bug 860542] New: Review Request: kchildlock - KDE Parental Control Application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860542 Bug ID: 860542 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: kchildlock - KDE Parental Control Application Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: nlmin...@gmail.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/Ignotus/fedora-packages/be100d9cb3308f89ac5d7e85c3b2daba23279314/kchildlock/kchildlock.spec SRPM URL: https://dl.dropbox.com/s/p81m5zidqm4i4hd/kchildlock-0.90.4.2-1.fc17.src.rpm?dl=1 Description: KDE Parental Control Application Fedora Account System Username: ignotusp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 860542] Review Request: kchildlock - KDE Parental Control Application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860542 Minh Ngo nlmin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews) Alias||kchildlock -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857180] Review Request: gnome-clocks - Clock application designed for GNOME 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857180 --- Comment #6 from Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com --- - Latest from upstream - 0.1.2 Spec URL: http://declera.com/~yaneti/gnome-clocks/gnome-clocks.spec SRPM URL: http://declera.com/~yaneti/gnome-clocks/gnome-clocks-0.1.2-1.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 860146] Review Request: vsqlite++ - A C++ Wrapper for SQLite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860146 --- Comment #8 from Vinzenz Feenstra eviliss...@gmail.com --- SPEC: https://raw.github.com/vinzenz/fedora-packages/vsqlite++/0.3.9-2/vsqlite++/vsqlite++.spec SRPM: https://github.com/downloads/vinzenz/fedora-packages/vsqlite++-0.3.9-2.fc17.src.rpm ChangeLog: * Wed Sep 26 2012 Vinzenz Feenstra eviliss...@gmail.com - 0.3.9-2 - Removed comment with macro - Not needed anymore (Fixed rpmlint warning) Koji build results for vsqlite++-0.3.9-2.fc17.src.rpm: F17: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4527693 F18: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4527692 Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4527694 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857487] Review Request: ht-alegreya-fonts - A Serif typeface originally intended for literature
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857487
Daiki Ueno du...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||du...@redhat.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|du...@redhat.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Daiki Ueno du...@redhat.com ---
Here is the review.
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[-]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[-]: Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[-]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: CheckResultdir
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
--requires).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
[-]: SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}.
Note: Source2 (ht-alegreyaSC-fonts-fontconfig.conf) Source0
(Alegreya.zip)
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all
[Bug 858841] Review Request: owncloud - Private file sync and share server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858841 Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mru...@redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com --- just a few drive-by comments: - is that main package functional without any of those database sub-packages? - you also need to require rsyslog (for dir /etc/rsyslog.d), note: there's also syslog-ng, you're fine to uninstall rsyslog from your system - same for that logrotate-snippet - the svg-editor is also LGPLv3 and MIT https://github.com/owncloud/apps/blob/master/files_svgedit/README http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses lists, LGPLv3 is only sort of compatible with AGPL. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857992] Review Request: JQuery - Fast, concise library that simplifies how you use JavaScript
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857992 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com --- jquery: latest version is (currently) 1.8.2. , 1.8.1 was released on Aug 30, so you'l need to update this package. In my experience, esp. web developers are pretty ignorant in bundling/copying external code. And also, most of them don't care for backwards compatibility. For example: Django developers: they said about the request to unbundle: Not having external dependencies is a design choice of Django. https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/17982 Django still uses jquery 1.4.2, and I don't see, this will change in the near future. jquery's release notes list some changes affecting backwards compatibility: http://blog.jquery.com/2012/08/09/jquery-1-8-released/ When breaking other's packages by upgrading to newer versions, you're also requested to fix those issues. I'm sure, I don't want to do that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 856217] Review Request: quearcode - A tool for creating QR Codes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856217 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- quearcode-0.2-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 860581] New: Review Request: dmlite-plugins-memcache - Memcached plug-in for dmlite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860581 Bug ID: 860581 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: dmlite-plugins-memcache - Memcached plug-in for dmlite Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: rocha.po...@gmail.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://rocha.web.cern.ch/rocha/fedora/dmlite-plugins-memcache.spec SRPM URL: http://rocha.web.cern.ch/rocha/fedora/dmlite-plugins-memcache-0.4.0-1.src.rpm Description: This package provides the memcached plug-in for dmlite. It provides a memcached based implementation of the NS interface. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 855656] Review Request: perl-Safe-Isa - Call isa, can, does and DOES safely on things that may not be objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855656 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Safe-Isa-1.02-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854837] inkscape-sozi - Inkscape extension for creating animated presentations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854837 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- inkscape-sozi-12.05-7.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 853463] Review Request: php-redis - Extension for communicating with the Redis key-value store
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853463 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-redis-2.2.2-5.git6f7087f.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 851702] Review Request: python-acoustid - Python bindings for Chromaprint acoustic fingerprinting and the Acoustid API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851702 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-acoustid-0.7-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 855656] Review Request: perl-Safe-Isa - Call isa, can, does and DOES safely on things that may not be objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855656 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Safe-Isa-1.02-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 845934] Review Request: wt - C++ library for developing web applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845934 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #42 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- wt-3.2.2-6.p1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 856217] Review Request: quearcode - A tool for creating QR Codes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856217 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- quearcode-0.2-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854691] Review Request: datovka - A free graphical interface for Czech Databox (Datové schránky)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854691 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-sudsds-1.0-2.fc17, python-dslib-2.1.2-2.fc17, datovka-2.1.2-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854690] Review Request: python-dslib - A Python library for accessing Czech Databox (Datové schránky)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854690 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-sudsds-1.0-2.fc17, python-dslib-2.1.2-2.fc17, datovka-2.1.2-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854679] Review Request: python-sudsds - A python SOAP client modified for usage with Czech Databox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854679 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-sudsds-1.0-2.fc17, python-dslib-2.1.2-2.fc17, datovka-2.1.2-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 851734] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Grammars - Add grammatical parsing features to perl regular expressions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851734 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Regexp-Grammars-1.021-4.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847182] Review Request: nhn-nanum-gothic-light-fonts - Nanum Gothic Light family of Korean TrueType fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847182 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nhn-nanum-gothic-light-fonts-1.000-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 845221] Review Request: ilbc - Internet Low Bitrate Codec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845221 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ilbc-1.1.1-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 855665] Review Request: perl-Data-Validate-Type - Public interface to Params::Util offering data type validation functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855665 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Data-Validate-Type-1.3.0-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854333] python-transifex
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854333 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-transifex-0.1.6-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 851702] Review Request: python-acoustid - Python bindings for Chromaprint acoustic fingerprinting and the Acoustid API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851702 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-acoustid-0.7-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 845934] Review Request: wt - C++ library for developing web applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845934 --- Comment #43 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- wt-3.2.2-6.p1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847182] Review Request: nhn-nanum-gothic-light-fonts - Nanum Gothic Light family of Korean TrueType fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847182 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nhn-nanum-gothic-light-fonts-1.000-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 860581] Review Request: dmlite-plugins-memcache - Memcached plug-in for dmlite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860581 --- Comment #1 from Ricardo Rocha rocha.po...@gmail.com --- Koji builds (successful): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4527957 (dist-5E-epel) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4527929 (dist-6E-epel) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4527934 (f17) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4527937 (f18) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4527940 (rawhide) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 860600] New: Review Request: dmlite-plugins-mysql - MySQL plug-in for dmlite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860600 Bug ID: 860600 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: dmlite-plugins-mysql - MySQL plug-in for dmlite Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: rocha.po...@gmail.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://rocha.web.cern.ch/rocha/fedora/dmlite-plugins-mysql.spec SRPM URL: http://rocha.web.cern.ch/rocha/fedora/dmlite-plugins-mysql-0.4.1-1.src.rpm Description: This package provides the MySQL plug-in for dmlite. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 740660] Review Request: python-d2to1 - Allows using distutils2-like setup.cfg files with setup.py
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740660 --- Comment #3 from Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com --- Ok, thanks for the review. I have removed the egg and the defattr. I have also updated to new upstream 0.2.7 Spec URL: http://guaix.fis.ucm.es/~spr/python-d2to1.spec SRPM URL: http://guaix.fis.ucm.es/~spr/python-d2to1-0.2.7-1.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 860600] Review Request: dmlite-plugins-mysql - MySQL plug-in for dmlite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860600 --- Comment #1 from Ricardo Rocha rocha.po...@gmail.com --- Koji builds (successful): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4527964 (dist-5E-epel) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4527974 (dist-6E-epel) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4527996 (f17) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4527999 (f18) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4528002 (rawhide) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 860607] New: Review Request: dmlite-plugins-adapter - Adapter plug-in for dmlite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860607 Bug ID: 860607 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: dmlite-plugins-adapter - Adapter plug-in for dmlite Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: rocha.po...@gmail.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://rocha.web.cern.ch/rocha/fedora/dmlite-plugins-adapter.spec SRPM URL: http://rocha.web.cern.ch/rocha/fedora/dmlite-plugins-adapter-0.4.0-1.src.rpm Description: This package provides the adapter plug-in for dmlite. This plug-in provides both a name-space and pool management implementation which fallback to forwarding calls to the old DPNS and DPM daemons. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 853692] Review Request: mate-settings-daemon - MATE Desktop settings daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853692 --- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 856114] Review Request: qxmpp - Qt XMPP Libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856114 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 842379] Review Request: mcollective-qpid-plugin - Plugin to enable m-collective communication over amqp 1.0 enabled broker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842379 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steve.tray...@cern.ch --- Comment #15 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch --- Re RHEL5 then reguardless of the OS of message broker a RHEL5 package would be needed if there is a single RHEL5 mcollective agent on your network. Steve. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 813842] Review Request: glfw , A cross-platform multimedia library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=813842 MERCIER Jonathan bioinfornat...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #24 from MERCIER Jonathan bioinfornat...@gmail.com --- Spec: http://bioinfornatics.fedorapeople.org/glfw.spec SRPMS : http://bioinfornatics.fedorapeople.org/glfw-3.0-0.7.20120812gita9ed5b1.fc17.src.rpm New Package SCM Request === Package Name: glfw Short Description: A cross-platform multimedia library Owners: bioinfornatics Branches: f17 f18 InitialCC: bioinfornatics -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847794] Review Request: gl3n An OpenGL Mathematics library for D
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847794 --- Comment #7 from MERCIER Jonathan bioinfornat...@gmail.com --- Done ldc own /usr/include/d I will see if gdc come into fedora -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854553] Review Request: gr-air-modes - SDR receiver for Mode S transponder signals (ADS-B)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854553 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- gr-air-modes-0-0.4.20120905git6c7a7370.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gr-air-modes-0-0.4.20120905git6c7a7370.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854553] Review Request: gr-air-modes - SDR receiver for Mode S transponder signals (ADS-B)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854553 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- gr-air-modes-0-0.4.20120905git6c7a7370.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gr-air-modes-0-0.4.20120905git6c7a7370.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 851800] Review Request: compiz - OpenGL window and compositing manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851800 --- Comment #7 from Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de --- (In reply to comment #5) This package was removed due to incompatibilities with the latest version of gnome, but Compiz works perfectly fine with other window managers (eg. XFCE). Don't retire a package just because it doesn't work for gnome users. Sorry, this compiz version is designed for the Mate-Desktop as you could see in the spec file. Hopefuly it works also for xfce and lxde. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 846346] Review Request: halibut - TeX-like software manual tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846346 Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ | Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com --- Package Change Request == Package Name: halibut New Branches: f16 Owners: jskarvad I will also take f16 branch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 813842] Review Request: glfw , A cross-platform multimedia library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=813842 --- Comment #25 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 846346] Review Request: halibut - TeX-like software manual tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846346 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 851800] Review Request: compiz - OpenGL window and compositing manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851800 --- Comment #8 from Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de --- The package is ready for review now. SPEC: http://raveit65.fedorapeople.org/compiz/SPEC/compiz.spec SRPM: http://raveit65.fedorapeople.org/compiz/SRPM/compiz-0.8.8-4.fc18.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Sep 26 2012 Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de - 0.8.8-4 - remove upstreamed patches - own include dir - add compiz-mate-gtk source and compiz-mate-gtk.desktop file - add keybinding sources - change %%define to %%global entries - rename no-more-gnome-wm-settings.patch to no-more-mate-wm-settings.patch - add compiz-0.88_incorrect-fsf-address.patch - clean up build section -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832953] Review Request: Syntastic - A syntax checker for programming language in vim
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832953 --- Comment #8 from MERCIER Jonathan bioinfornat...@gmail.com --- SPEC: http://bioinfornatics.fedorapeople.org/syntastic.spec SRPM: http://bioinfornatics.fedorapeople.org/syntastic-2.3.0-5.20120917git72856e6.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 851800] Review Request: compiz - OpenGL window and compositing manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851800 --- Comment #9 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com --- (In reply to comment #8) The package is ready for review now. There is still a block in place due to mate-control-center. SPEC: http://raveit65.fedorapeople.org/compiz/SPEC/compiz.spec SRPM: http://raveit65.fedorapeople.org/compiz/SRPM/compiz-0.8.8-4.fc18.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Sep 26 2012 Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de - 0.8.8-4 - remove upstreamed patches - own include dir - add compiz-mate-gtk source and compiz-mate-gtk.desktop file - add keybinding sources - change %%define to %%global entries - rename no-more-gnome-wm-settings.patch to no-more-mate-wm-settings.patch - add compiz-0.88_incorrect-fsf-address.patch - clean up build section Please remove compiz-0.88_incorrect-fsf-address.patch as it is against guidelines to patch COPYING https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#incorrect-fsf-address -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 838901] Review Request: autotest-framework - Framework for fully automated testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838901 Martin Krizek mkri...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|jpope...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flags|fedora-review+ | Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #24 from Martin Krizek mkri...@redhat.com --- Thanks everyone who participated in the review! (I am requesting branches only now as I was waiting for a new Autotest release.) New Package SCM Request === Package Name: autotest-framework Short Description: Autotest is a framework for fully automated testing. Owners: mkrizek Branches: f16 f17 f18 el5 el6 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 838901] Review Request: autotest-framework - Framework for fully automated testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838901 Jiri Popelka jpope...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jpope...@redhat.com Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 860625] New: Review Request: pycanberra - A very basic (and incomplete) wrapper for libcanberra
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860625 Bug ID: 860625 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: pycanberra - A very basic (and incomplete) wrapper for libcanberra Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: boche...@fedoraproject.org Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/pycanberra.spec SRPM URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/pycanberra-0-0.1.git65c3b3f.fc18.src.rpm Description: A very basic (and incomplete) wrapper for libcanberra. This is necessary until libcanberra gets proper GObject Introspection support. Fedora Account System Username: bochecha -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857180] Review Request: gnome-clocks - Clock application designed for GNOME 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857180 Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||boche...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #7 from Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org --- (In reply to comment #2) If anyone wishes to package pycanberra in some form this could be revisited. I just submitted a review request for pycanberra: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860625 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 860625] Review Request: pycanberra - A very basic (and incomplete) wrapper for libcanberra
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860625 Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||857180 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857180] Review Request: gnome-clocks - Clock application designed for GNOME 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857180 Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||860625 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 860625] Review Request: pycanberra - A very basic (and incomplete) wrapper for libcanberra
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860625 Adel Gadllah adel.gadl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||adel.gadl...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Adel Gadllah adel.gadl...@gmail.com --- Looks good, rpmlint output is just noise: --- pycanberra.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) libcanberra - Canberra pycanberra.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libcanberra - Canberra pycanberra.src: W: invalid-url Source0: pycanberra-git.65c3b3f.tar.xz pycanberra.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: pycanberra-git.65c3b3f.tar.xz pycanberra.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) libcanberra - Canberra pycanberra.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libcanberra - Canberra 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. (You could just remove the empty %build but that would trigger another rpmlint warning so just leave it as is). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 739347] Review Request: haveged - A Linux entropy source using the HAVEGE algorithm. Feed entropy into random pool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739347 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2012-09-26 06:56:39 --- Comment #25 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi --- Odd that the update system hasn't closed this, even though the updates have hit stable. Closing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 860625] Review Request: pycanberra - A very basic (and incomplete) wrapper for libcanberra
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860625 Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org --- Thanks Adel! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: pycanberra Short Description: A very basic (and incomplete) wrapper for libcanberra Owners: bochecha Branches: devel f18 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857180] Review Request: gnome-clocks - Clock application designed for GNOME 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857180 --- Comment #8 from Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com --- - Use packaged pycanberra Spec URL: http://declera.com/~yaneti/gnome-clocks/gnome-clocks.spec SRPM URL: http://declera.com/~yaneti/gnome-clocks/gnome-clocks-0.1.2-2.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 860625] Review Request: pycanberra - A very basic (and incomplete) wrapper for libcanberra
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860625 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Adel, please take ownership of review BZs, thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832953] Review Request: Syntastic - A syntax checker for programming language in vim
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832953
Pavel Raiskup prais...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(bioinfornatics@gm
||ail.com)
--- Comment #9 from Pavel Raiskup prais...@redhat.com ---
The very last think is that the autoload directory should be owned by
vim-filesystem only (and with slash):
rpm -qf /usr/share/vim/vimfiles/autoload/
diff --git a/srpm/syntastic.spec b/srpm/syntastic.spec
index 54ffc2d..9207e52 100644
--- a/srpm/syntastic.spec
+++ b/srpm/syntastic.spec
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ exit 0
%files
%doc _assets/screenshot_1.png README.markdown LICENCE
-%{vimfiles}/autoload
+%dir %{vimfiles}/autoload/syntastic/
%{vimfiles}/plugin/syntastic.vim
%{vimfiles}/doc/syntastic.txt
%dir %{vimfiles}/syntax_checkers/
I tried to find the reason why:
$ rpm -qf rpm -qf /usr/share/vim/vimfiles/autoload/syntastic/c.vim
syntastic-2.3.0-5.20120917git72856e6.fc17.noarch
syntastic-c-2.3.0-5.20120917git72856e6.fc17.noarch
Could you repair it before approval or should I give you fedora-review+ flag
now and you will repair it later on?
Pavel
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 860625] Review Request: pycanberra - A very basic (and incomplete) wrapper for libcanberra
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860625 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||limburg...@gmail.com Flags|fedora-cvs+ | Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Also, please post more detail about exactly what you reviewed, etc. There are several templates available on the wiki as a starting point. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857180] Review Request: gnome-clocks - Clock application designed for GNOME 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857180 --- Comment #9 from Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com --- 0.1.2-3 - Forgot about the License tag Spec URL: http://declera.com/~yaneti/gnome-clocks/gnome-clocks.spec SRPM URL: http://declera.com/~yaneti/gnome-clocks/gnome-clocks-0.1.2-3.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 851800] Review Request: compiz - OpenGL window and compositing manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851800 --- Comment #10 from Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de --- (In reply to comment #9) (In reply to comment #8) Please remove compiz-0.88_incorrect-fsf-address.patch as it is against guidelines to patch COPYING https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#incorrect-fsf-address Thanks Leigh, i remove the COPYING parts from the patch and notice upstream about this issue. http://bugs.compiz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92 New sources: SPEC: http://raveit65.fedorapeople.org/compiz/SPEC/compiz.spec SRPM: http://raveit65.fedorapeople.org/compiz/SRPM/compiz-0.8.8-5.fc18.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 785462] Review Request: sinfo - Show an overview of the available computers an their current load
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785462 --- Comment #8 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at --- Guillermo Gómez, please explain why you think they are necessary. [makerpm@desktop SPECS]$ rpm -qp --requires /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/sinfo-0.0.47-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm /bin/sh boost libboost_signals-mt.so.1.47.0()(64bit) libboost_system-mt.so.1.47.0()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.14)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.2)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.7)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.8)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.9)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libmessage.so.0()(64bit) libmessageio.so.0()(64bit) libmessageiobase.so.0()(64bit) libmessageparser.so.0()(64bit) libncurses.so.5()(64bit) libnsl.so.1()(64bit) libprotocol.so.0()(64bit) libprotocolasio.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.3.2)(64bit) libresolv.so.2()(64bit) librpc.so.0()(64bit) libsinfometer-0.0.47.so()(64bit) libsinfotypes-0.0.47.so()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.1)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.11)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.15)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.9)(64bit) libtinfo.so.5()(64bit) ncurses rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) = 5.2-1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 860625] Review Request: pycanberra - A very basic (and incomplete) wrapper for libcanberra
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860625 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Fixing flag. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 818401] Review Request: 0ad - Cross-Platform RTS Game of Ancient Warfare
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818401 --- Comment #54 from Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to --- Don't forget to add it as a member to the games group in comps. You can already do it for rawhide. It should be also done for other releases as it makes it to stable / updates. Thanks for packaging it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 852174] Review Request: snapper - Tool for filesystem snapshot management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852174
--- Comment #6 from Ondrej Kozina okoz...@redhat.com ---
Update to latest devel version with dbus interface. I've done some basic code
review but it would be nice if someone would look at it as well.
Moreover I think selinux policy will have to be updated to enable dbus
communcation for the snapper package.
I'm not sure if that file should be where it is:
%{_libdir}/%{name}/bin/compare-dirs
The binary is considered obsolete and removed completely from dbus version.
Background tasks are handled by snapperd daemon.
Spec URL: http://okozina.fedorapeople.org/snapper/0.0.14/3/snapper.spec
SRPM URL:
http://okozina.fedorapeople.org/snapper/0.0.14/3/snapper-0.0.14-3.20120926git7918e5c.fc19.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 852174] Review Request: snapper - Tool for filesystem snapshot management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852174 --- Comment #7 from Ondrej Kozina okoz...@redhat.com --- Hi David, just wanted to let you know I request to add new dbus enabled service -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 785462] Review Request: sinfo - Show an overview of the available computers an their current load
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785462 --- Comment #9 from Guillermo Gómez guillermo.go...@gmail.com --- There are cases where the build process does not pickup the dependencies and for new packagers that could confuse them, add or not the Requires. In this particular case, there's no problem, both Requires can go away and in general we should not include explicit Requires for cases like this (my only motivation was educational). Reference: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Explicit_Requires -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 819951] Review Request: ostree - Linux-based operating system develop/build/deploy tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819951 --- Comment #16 from Colin Walters walt...@redhat.com --- New release: SRPM: http://fedorapeople.org/~walters/ostree/ostree-2012.11-1.fc18.src.rpm SPEC: http://fedorapeople.org/~walters/ostree/ostree.spec Not much changed from the above other than a new upstream release. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 853252] Review Request: datanommer - A storage consumer for the Fedora Message Bus (fedmsg)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853252 Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-09-26 09:49:28 --- Comment #12 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com --- Updates - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/datanommer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858060] qpid-snmpd - SNMP agent for qpid broker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858060
--- Comment #8 from Ernie eal...@redhat.com ---
Changed from an init.d script to a unit file.
Removed the step to zip the man page.
SPEC URL: http://eallen.fedorapeople.org/qpid-snmpd.spec
SRPM URL: http://eallen.fedorapeople.org/qpid-snmpd-1.0.0-4.fc17.src.rpm
TAR URL: http://eallen.fedorapeople.org/qpid-snmpd-1.0.0.tar.bz2
One thing of note:
Installing the qpid-snmpd.service file in %{_unitdir} does generate an rpmlint
warning:
[eallen@redhat x86_64]$ rpmlint *rpm ../../SPECS/qpid-snmpd.spec
qpid-snmpd.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
But it appears that this warning is bogus:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794777
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 860697] New: Review Request: tmw - The Mana World is a 2D MMORPG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860697 Bug ID: 860697 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: tmw - The Mana World is a 2D MMORPG Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: martin.giesek...@uos.de Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://mgieseki.fedorapeople.org/review/tmw.spec SRPM URL: http://mgieseki.fedorapeople.org/review/tmw-20110911-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: The Mana World (TMW for short) is an innovative, free and open source MMORPG. Besides the official game server, this client can connect to multiple community-grown servers, which provide varied environments and further challenge. In TMW, the players solve quests, fight monsters, practice skills and study magic. Social activities include parties, trading and limited PvP in designated areas. While there are no limits to solo play, collaborative behavior such as healing others, fighting together and banding up against tougher monsters are rewarded in the game. The Mana World graphics have been inspired by 2D pixel art at its prime of the late 1990s, when many RPG classics, such as Secret of Mana for the Super Nintendo Entertainment System, were released. Additional information: tmw is supposed to replace the manaworld package which conflicts with mana. tmw is based on mana and provides the manaworld branding/theme only. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 860703] New: Review Request: tmw-music - Music files for The Mana World
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860703 Bug ID: 860703 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: tmw-music - Music files for The Mana World Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: martin.giesek...@uos.de Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://mgieseki.fedorapeople.org/review/tmw-music.spec SRPM URL: http://mgieseki.fedorapeople.org/review/tmw-music-0.3-5.fc17.src.rpm Description: This package contains the optional music files for The Mana World (TMW). Additional information: tmw-music is supposed to replace manaworld-music, an optional music package for manaworld. manaworld is going to be replaced with tmw because of file conflicts. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 860703] Review Request: tmw-music - Music files for The Mana World
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860703 Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||860697 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 860697] Review Request: tmw - The Mana World is a 2D MMORPG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860697 Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||860703 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 860697] Review Request: tmw - The Mana World is a 2D MMORPG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860697 Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||tmw -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 860703] Review Request: tmw-music - Music files for The Mana World
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860703 Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||tmw-music -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 853694] Review Request: mate-control-center - MATE Desktop control center
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853694 --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- In order of preference, you'll need to: * find a way for the buildsys not to create those files (patching maybe) * manually delete them or * use %exclude on those files. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848388] Review Request: liblognorm - Tool to normalize log data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848388 Miloslav Trmač m...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@redhat.com Component|pacemaker |Package Review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847811] Review Request: libee - An event expression library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847811 Miloslav Trmač m...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@redhat.com Component|pacemaker |Package Review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847817] Review Request: libestr - A library to handle strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847817 Miloslav Trmač m...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@redhat.com Component|pacemaker |Package Review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832635] Review Request: pencil - A sketching and GUI prototyping tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832635 --- Comment #6 from Truong Anh Tuan tua...@iwayvietnam.com --- All necessary changes have been made. Updated .spec file: http://tuanta.fedorapeople.org/pencil/pencil.spec And new .src file: http://tuanta.fedorapeople.org/pencil/pencil-2.0-2.fc17.src.rpm Please help me to review the package. Rgds, Tuan -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832635] Review Request: pencil - A sketching and GUI prototyping tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832635 --- Comment #7 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at --- No prebuilt binaries! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832635] Review Request: pencil - A sketching and GUI prototyping tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832635 --- Comment #8 from Truong Anh Tuan tua...@iwayvietnam.com --- You meant the file /usr/bin/pencil, right? It's just a shell script file, not a binary. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832635] Review Request: pencil - A sketching and GUI prototyping tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832635 --- Comment #9 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at --- I'm sorry! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 836821] Review Request: libcec - Library for HDMI-CEC device control
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836821 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(pbrobinson@gmail. | |com)| --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com --- Sorry about delayed response. 1.8.x had build issues, and I've been away. 1.9.0 now builds so updated. (In reply to comment #1) The license is GPLv2+, but it is actually dual-licensed: Fedora doesn't use the commercial license option so it's the only relevant license for our use case The FSF address is outdated and should be replaced. Also let upstream know. I'll fix it when it's fixed upstream (it might be already in 1.9.0) but I'll let them know If this is a snapshot, the release should be different: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#NonNumericRelease No it's not a snapshot. It's the release using their git tag. Theit github generated archives have issues so we generate them from the git source but it's still a tagged release so we can still use the standard NVRs The version number in the changelog also doesn't match. Fixed. Please add ?_isa, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package Added Why do you require systemd-devel? Because that's where the udev library headers are now and it uses udev. rpmlint complains about mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 1) and the non-american spelling of utilizing. cec-config should be in the main package. Line 1 is a comment so it's completely irrelevant. I've updated the comment further. cec-config IS in the main package: $ rpm -qlp libcec-1.9.0-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm /usr/bin/cec-client /usr/bin/cec-config /usr/lib64/libcec.so.1 /usr/lib64/libcec.so.1.0.9 defattr is no longer necessary. Consider to add ChangeLog as documentation. I thought I had done both of those. Fixed. SPEC: as above SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/libcec-1.9.0-1.fc17.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4529045 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 836821] Review Request: libcec - Library for HDMI-CEC device control
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836821 --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com --- Volker: are you doing a proper review on this? if so please assign as appropriate -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 843997] Review Request: mlpack - scalable C++ machine learning library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843997 --- Comment #11 from José Matos jama...@fc.up.pt --- There is no need to add the files as attachments. :-) Some more low hanging fruit. 1) There is no need to put the license file in place in the %install section. It is enough to do this in the %files section: %files ... %doc LICENSE.txt and voila... this replaces all the logic you have now and it does precisely the same. :-) 2) In reference to point 2 from #6 above: The documentation is Doxygen-generated HTML which a user could more easily access at mlpack.org (it is prettier there, too). I don't think it's necessary to include that amount of stuff with the distribution, especially when a user could generate it themselves using Doxygen painlessly. I have a different opinion regarding this. If the documentation is provided by upstream it is my opinion that we should provide it, even if we place it on a -doc sub-package that it is not required by the main package. This subject is discussed here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Documentation As a rationale for the above sometimes I am in places with small or no connectivity at all and having an update documentation is a boon. I am perfectly able to run doxygen but if this is a new package that I am exploring pre-available off-line documentation is a bonus in my book. :-) 3) Running rpmlint on the generated rpms shows that libxml is a superfluous requirement and it should be dropped since that dependency is automatically taken from BuildRequires. The same point applies to the boost* libraries, to armadillo and to lapack. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 836821] Review Request: libcec - Library for HDMI-CEC device control
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836821 --- Comment #4 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at --- GPLv2+ -- not GPLv2 If I'll take the review, I'll assign myself. For now I'm commenting. It's easier for the reviewer if you bump the release on changes and leave changelog entries. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848142] Review Request: maliit-plugins - Input method plugins
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848142 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags||fedora-cvs- --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com --- Will fix the comments above on commit. Thanks for the review New Package GIT Request === Package Name: maliit-plugins Short Description: Input method plugins Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-18 F-17 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848139] Review Request: maliit-framework - Input method framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848139 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com --- Will fix the comments above on commit. Thanks for the review New Package GIT Request === Package Name: maliit-framework Short Description: Input method framework Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-18 F-17 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848139] Review Request: maliit-framework - Input method framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848139 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 852174] Review Request: snapper - Tool for filesystem snapshot management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852174 --- Comment #8 from David Zeuthen dav...@redhat.com --- (In reply to comment #7) just wanted to let you know I request to add new dbus enabled service Any package can include D-Bus services, there is no central registry or anything like that. So it doesn't make sense to request one... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848142] Review Request: maliit-plugins - Input method plugins
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848142 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs- | Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848142] Review Request: maliit-plugins - Input method plugins
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848142 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 860146] Review Request: vsqlite++ - A C++ Wrapper for SQLite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860146 Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com --- Package looks good now, except one tiny thing. doc subpackage should be noarch. But that's indeed small issue which I believe you'll fix without problems. I have approved the packages so now you can follow: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests Please add me to the initial cc for the package so I can tiptoe around you for a while :-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 823458] Review Request: erlang-erlsha2 - SHA-224, SHA-256, SHA-384, SHA-512 implemented in Erlang NIFs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823458 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||NotReady --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com --- This package is slowly merging into base Erlang distribution (since R15B02) so perhaps it's better to withdraw it. I will reconsider it soon. Do NOT start review, please. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 860521] Review Request: mate-session-manager - MATE Desktop session manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860521 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Version|17 |rawhide -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 860515] Review Request: mate-themes - MATE Desktop themes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860515 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Version|17 |rawhide Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rdie...@math.unl.edu Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- moar fun to do! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834681] Review Request: python-sieve - XML Comparison Utils
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834681
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
$ rpmlint -i -v *
python3-sieve.noarch: I: checking
python3-sieve.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US webapp - web
app, web-app, weapon
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python3-sieve.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eq - e, q, seq
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python3-sieve.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xml - XML, ml, x
ml
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python3-sieve.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US html - HTML, ht
ml, ht-ml
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python3-sieve.noarch: I: checking-url http://pypi.python.org/pypi/sieve
(timeout 10 seconds)
python-sieve.src: I: checking
python-sieve.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US webapp - web app,
web-app, weapon
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python-sieve.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eq - e, q, seq
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python-sieve.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xml - XML, ml, x ml
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python-sieve.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US html - HTML, ht ml,
ht-ml
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python-sieve.src: I: checking-url http://pypi.python.org/pypi/sieve (timeout 10
seconds)
python-sieve.src: I: checking-url
http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/s/sieve/sieve-0.1.6.tar.gz (timeout 10
seconds)
python-sieve.noarch: I: checking
python-sieve.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US webapp - web app,
web-app, weapon
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python-sieve.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eq - e, q, seq
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python-sieve.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xml - XML, ml, x
ml
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python-sieve.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US html - HTML, ht
ml, ht-ml
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python-sieve.noarch: I: checking-url http://pypi.python.org/pypi/sieve (timeout
10 seconds)
python-sieve.spec: I: checking-url
http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/s/sieve/sieve-0.1.6.tar.gz (timeout 10
seconds)
(none): E: no installed packages by name sieve-0.1.6.tar.gz.packaged
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 12 warnings.
No real issues anymore.
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
MIT
[+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it
is used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream URL can be
specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to
deal with this.
$ sha256sum *
bb840f52804617f683ff84ab02e71f4f25ef5f568d658d7637846bb5d238c068
sieve-0.1.6.tar.gz
bb840f52804617f683ff84ab02e71f4f25ef5f568d658d7637846bb5d238c068
sieve-0.1.6.tar.gz.packaged
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason
[Bug 740660] Review Request: python-d2to1 - Allows using distutils2-like setup.cfg files with setup.py
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740660
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
Scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4529544
$ rpmlint -i -v *
python3-d2to1.noarch: I: checking
python3-d2to1.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) cfg - cf, cg, cog
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python3-d2to1.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) py - pt, p, y
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python3-d2to1.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cfg - cf, cg,
cog
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python3-d2to1.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US metadata - meta
data, meta-data, metatarsal
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python3-d2to1.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US setuptools -
setup tools, setup-tools, toadstools
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python3-d2to1.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US py - pt, p, y
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python3-d2to1.noarch: I: checking-url http://pypi.python.org/pypi/d2to1
(timeout 10 seconds)
python-d2to1.src: I: checking
python-d2to1.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) cfg - cf, cg, cog
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python-d2to1.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) py - pt, p, y
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python-d2to1.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cfg - cf, cg, cog
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python-d2to1.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US metadata - meta
data, meta-data, metatarsal
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python-d2to1.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US setuptools - setup
tools, setup-tools, toadstools
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python-d2to1.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US py - pt, p, y
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python-d2to1.src: I: checking-url http://pypi.python.org/pypi/d2to1 (timeout 10
seconds)
python-d2to1.src: I: checking-url
http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/d/d2to1/d2to1-0.2.7.tar.gz (timeout 10
seconds)
python-d2to1.noarch: I: checking
python-d2to1.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) cfg - cf, cg, cog
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python-d2to1.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) py - pt, p, y
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python-d2to1.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cfg - cf, cg, cog
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python-d2to1.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US metadata - meta
data, meta-data, metatarsal
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python-d2to1.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US setuptools -
setup tools, setup-tools, toadstools
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python-d2to1.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US py - pt, p, y
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python-d2to1.noarch: I: checking-url http://pypi.python.org/pypi/d2to1 (timeout
10 seconds)
python-d2to1.spec: I: checking-url
http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/d/d2to1/d2to1-0.2.7.tar.gz (timeout 10
seconds)
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 18 warnings.
Some ignorable spelling errors, nothing of interest so far.
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
BSD
[+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American
