[Bug 815018] Review Request: nodejs - javascript fast build framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815018 --- Comment #41 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com --- (In reply to comment #40) Stephen, Am sorry but I dont like the idea that you take over my package. We can work together on this am more than glad to add any suggestion but not to take it away from me. All my effort gonna be lost and I gonna continue working on it. Send me all the ideas and mods that u want to apply and I will be glad to do it With my fedora packager hat on: Adrian, with all given respect, I think this package is a number too large for a beginning packager. Adrian, you tried to package this in a proper way for a half year now; the progress I can see is, that your three proposals provided are basically the same, for three different upstream versions. Apparently you didn't try to solve any of the existing (listed) problems. During this half year, we didn't see progress driven by you. Just hacking together a spec file is just a very small part of the whole packaging thing. I really urge you to hand over this package review to Stephen. He had shown the right way, communicated with upstream and his efforts already showed progress there. Adrian, speaking about your lost work. It isn't your work and it's not lost; since this is free software, everybody should use and improve it. For my contributions, I'd like to see improvements, nothing is perfect. With my Red Hat on: We need this package *sooner* or later packaged in a proper and secure way, and also could use some upstream involvement. Adrian, I currently can't see, how you handle that. I'm sorry for these open and harsh words, but I didn't see insight in thoughtful conversation, held in private and also public. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 815018] Review Request: nodejs - javascript fast build framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815018 --- Comment #42 from Adrian Alves aal...@gmail.com --- Matthias am not a newbie I built packages for companys in USA since 2006 u can check it on my fedora wiki. Am glad to apply or add any contribution that u have we can co maintain the package please stop pushing me and send me all the contributions that u want to add to the package this didnt help in anything. Ill be waiting for any ur your patches but not more comments like this, If you have doubts about my skill talk with Toshio my mentor! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 760177] Review Request: knot - Authoritative DNS server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760177 --- Comment #33 from Stanislav Petr g...@glux.org --- Fixed packages: http://my.glux.org/fedora/packages/knot/knot.spec http://my.glux.org/fedora/packages/knot/knot-1.1.1-1.fc16.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 873256] Review Request: python-cssselect - cssselect parses CSS3 Selectors and translates them to XPath 1.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873256 Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||karlthe...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|karlthe...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com --- I'm reviewing this package since it is required for newer versions of Calibre to work properly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 873738] Review Request: sequence-library - Textual diff and merge library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873738 Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(ism...@olea.org) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 760177] Review Request: knot - Authoritative DNS server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760177 --- Comment #34 from Stanislav Petr g...@glux.org --- Created attachment 640075 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=640075action=edit spec for knot 1.1.1-1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874105] Review Request: qpid-proton - Proton is a high performance, lightweight messaging library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874105 Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874105] New: Review Request: qpid-proton - Proton is a high performance, lightweight messaging library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874105 Bug ID: 874105 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: qpid-proton - Proton is a high performance, lightweight messaging library Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: dpie...@redhat.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qpid-proton.spec SRPM URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qpid-proton-0.2-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Proton is a high performance, lightweight messaging library. It can be used in the widest range of messaging applications including brokers, client libraries, routers, bridges, proxies, and more. Proton is based on the AMQP 1.0 messaging standard. Using Proton it is trivial to integrate with the AMQP 1.0 ecosystem from any platform, environment, or language. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4662498 Fedora Account System Username: mcpierce -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 873813] Review Request: gnome-shell-search-github-repositories - Search your Github Repos from the gnome-shell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873813 --- Comment #2 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com --- New version out with support for searching github Organizations. Spec URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/gnome-shell-search-github-repositories.spec SRPM URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/gnome-shell-search-github-repositories-1.0.0-1.fc18.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 864535] Review Request: libvirt-designer - Libvirt configuration designer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864535 Michal Privoznik mpriv...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2012-11-07 09:32:50 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 836368] Review Request: rubygem-bicho - Library to access Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836368
--- Comment #3 from Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Also:
* The spec file doesn't run tests. You should always run the test suite,
especially if it's provided by upstream. Include the tests that come with
the gem and run them in %check section. If they are based on Test::Unit you
can use minitest to run them (which is a recommended way).
In your spec file:
- require minitest
BuildRequires: rubygem(minitest)
- add check section that goes after %build
%check
pushd .%{gem_instdir}
testrb -Ilib test
The test that fails has a dependency on Novell. So, for now, I'm going to skip
adding any test checks to the specfile.
Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4662553
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874128] New: Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Stream - Horde stream handler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874128 Bug ID: 874128 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Stream - Horde stream handler Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: fed...@famillecollet.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/remicollet/remirepo/master/php/horde/php-horde-Horde-Stream/php-horde-Horde-Stream.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/php-horde-Horde-Stream-1.1.1-1.remi.src.rpm Description: An object-oriented interface to assist in creating and storing PHP stream resources, and to provide utility methods to access and manipulate the stream contents. Fedora Account System Username: remi -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874128] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Stream - Horde stream handler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874128 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||785606 (horde-test) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 785606] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Test - Horde testing base classes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785606 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||874128 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 836368] Review Request: rubygem-bicho - Library to access Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836368 Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bkab...@redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com --- Hi Darryl, rubygem-bicho depends on rubygem-inifile in runtime. I don't see inifile in Fedora, nor it has an opened review. I think you should first package all the dependencies before actually finishing this review. Inifile seems to be the only thing you will need. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 785606] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Test - Horde testing base classes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785606 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||874172 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874172] New: Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Secret - Secret Encryption API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874172 Bug ID: 874172 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Secret - Secret Encryption API Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: fed...@famillecollet.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/remicollet/remirepo/master/php/horde/php-horde-Horde-Secret/php-horde-Horde-Secret.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/php-horde-Horde-Secret-2.0.0-2.remi.src.rpm Description: An API for encrypting and decrypting small pieces of data with the use of a shared key. Fedora Account System Username: remi -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874172] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Secret - Secret Encryption API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874172 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||n...@fedoraproject.org Depends On||785606 (horde-test) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874184] Review Request: peervpn - A VPN software using full mesh network topology
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874184 Jan Cholasta jchol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874184] New: Review Request: peervpn - A VPN software using full mesh network topology
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874184 Bug ID: 874184 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: peervpn - A VPN software using full mesh network topology Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: jchol...@redhat.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/464637/peervpn.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/464637/peervpn-0.028-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: PeerVPN is software that builds virtual Ethernet networks between multiple computers. It uses full mesh network topology and can automatically build tunnels through firewalls and NATs. It supports shared key encryption and authentication. Fedora Account System Username: jcholast Rpmlint output: $ rpmlint SPECS/peervpn.spec SRPMS/peervpn-0.028-1.fc18.src.rpm RPMS/x86_64/peervpn-0.028-1.fc18.x86_64.rpm peervpn.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib - This is caused by the included systemd unit file. peervpn.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/peervpn 0700L - This is done on purpose, the directory contains configuration files which contain sensitive information, such as passwords, in plain text. peervpn.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary peervpn - Upstream does not provide the manual page ATM. 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. Koji build URL: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4662803 This is my first package, I'm looking for sponsorship. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 869121] Review Request: php-sabredav-Sabre_CalDAV - CalDAV plugin for Sabre_DAV
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869121 Matthew Miller mat...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mat...@redhat.com Blocks||858841 (owncloud) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858841] Review Request: owncloud - Private file sync and share server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858841 Matthew Miller mat...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||869123 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 869123] Review Request: php-sabredav-Sabre_CardDAV - CardDAV plugin for Sabre_DAV
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869123 Matthew Miller mat...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mat...@redhat.com Blocks||858841 (owncloud) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858841] Review Request: owncloud - Private file sync and share server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858841 Matthew Miller mat...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||869121 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858841] Review Request: owncloud - Private file sync and share server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858841 --- Comment #25 from Matthew Miller mat...@redhat.com --- Where is php-pear-MDB2-Driver-sqlite coming from? I don't see a review request -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865630] Review Request: python-pyvfs - simple python vfs module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865630 Saveliev Peter p...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2012-11-07 12:12:40 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865915] Review Request: python-py9p - Pure Python implementation of 9p protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865915 Saveliev Peter p...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2012-11-07 12:12:49 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 867159] Review Request: zabbix20 - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867159 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834481] Review Request: lttng-tools - LTTng control and utility programs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834481 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- lttng-tools-2.0.4-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 867159] Review Request: zabbix20 - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867159 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- zabbix20-2.0.3-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 827810] Review Request: obnam - An easy, secure backup program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827810 Anton Shevtsov shevtsov.an...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||shevtsov.an...@gmail.com --- Comment #24 from Anton Shevtsov shevtsov.an...@gmail.com --- obnam does not work in CentOS6. try simple command: obnam backup --verbose --repository /tmp/OBNAM/ sftp://u...@domain.tld/tmp/ you get is 'timeout lock' always -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 873408] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Role - PEAR installer role used to install Horde components
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873408 --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- Minor fix to have scriplet succeed. https://github.com/remicollet/remirepo/commit/5124d3a3b566a0d31c8e93f5335159e3ec5b7993 Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/remicollet/remirepo/master/php/horde/php-horde-Horde-Role/php-horde-Horde-Role.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/php-horde-Horde-Role-1.0.0-3.remi.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858841] Review Request: owncloud - Private file sync and share server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858841 --- Comment #26 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- php-pear-MDB2-Driver-sqlite requires php sqlite extension (v2) which is deprecated for years (pdo_sqlite and sqlite3 exists), moved from php 5.4 sources to pecl (but unmaintained), and removed from fedora (for years). So the sqlite sub package could probably be dropped. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 815018] Review Request: nodejs - javascript fast build framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815018 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a.bad...@gmail.com --- Comment #43 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com --- Could we all take a moment to think of other ways to resolve our problems? I think that language differences are playing a role in inflating the differences here but that there's also a basic conflict that we should try to address calmly. Fedora is a Project as well as a Product. The project aims not just to produce the Fedora distribution but also to teach people how to be better packagers and to foster a collaborative environment for people to make that eventual Fedora distribution the best that it can be. @adrian - you do have experience with rpm packaging. But there are many things about packaging for Fedora and working on upstream projects that you may not have experience with. The free software ecosystem is very large and diverse so this is always going to be the case. I have been working on the Packaging Guidelines since the beginning of Fedora and there are definitely types of packages that I *would* be a newbie at packaging. There's no shame in this. With this package, we're running across some things that you might not have dealt with before. What is a bundled library? How do I deal with them? What changes to the upstream code do I have to make to fix those? Some of those answers are on the http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Treatment_Of_Bundled_Libraries page that has already been linked. Others are expected to be general knowledge by people who are doing packaging. Still others require someone to learn the programming language the upstream is written in, become involved with the upstream communities, and submit patches to them to fix issues. These are big commitments of time and effort. sgallagh has started investing that time. Unless you are willing to put in that time and start examining the source code, figuring out what changes have been made, looking for ways to merge those patches upstream, and in general, becoming just as much a member of the upstream community as you are a member of the Fedora community, it would be extremely beneficial for you to do everything in your power to accommodate him. @mrunge - In Fedora, we give people the opportunity to succeed or fail and more importantly, the opportunity to learn while they are failing and then correct their mistakes. We cannot pay people with money for the work that they are willing to do. Instead we pay them by teaching them to be better packagers and helping them to achieve things that they could not do on their own. In some cases, like this, it may well be faster and more efficient to do the work yourself than to have to teach another person as you're doing that work. But if we don't take the time to teach we'll gradually marginalize people outside of our inner circle and then Fedora will shrink and die. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874238] New: Review Request: DOM Tooltip (aka domTT) is a Javascript widget
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874238 Bug ID: 874238 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: DOM Tooltip (aka domTT) is a Javascript widget Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: mgans...@alice.de Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora DOM Tooltip (aka domTT) is a Javascript widget, released under the Apache 2.0 license, which allows developers to add customized tool-tips to their web sites. Spec URL: https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/VDR/vdr-live/domtt-0.7.3-1/domtt.spec?a=GlnyuPEdRDc SRPM URL: https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/VDR/vdr-live/domtt-0.7.3-1/domtt-0.7.3-1.fc17.src.rpm?a=1e5n1nyvDqk rpmlint domtt-0.7.3-1.fc17.src.rpm domtt.src:24: W: macro-in-comment %build domtt.src: W: no-%build-section 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. rpmlint domtt-0.7.3-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm domtt.x86_64: E: no-binary 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 827810] Review Request: obnam - An easy, secure backup program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827810 --- Comment #25 from Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com --- This is probably a bug for upstream. Depends on what --verbose output I suppose. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874238] Review Request: DOM Tooltip (aka domTT) is a Javascript widget
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874238 MartinKG mgans...@alice.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mru...@redhat.com Blocks||821233 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 859675] Review Request: wcd - chdir for DOS and Unix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859675 Erwin Waterlander water...@xs4all.nl changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ | Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #23 from Erwin Waterlander water...@xs4all.nl --- Package Change Request == Package Name: wcd New Branches: f17 Owners: waterlan InitialCC: mrunge twaugh Make wcd available in the current f17 branch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 853514] Review Request: rubygem-clouddb - Ruby interface into the Rackspace Cloud DB service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853514 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- Package rubygem-clouddb-0.0.1-3.fc18: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing rubygem-clouddb-0.0.1-3.fc18' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-17719/rubygem-clouddb-0.0.1-3.fc18 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 853514] Review Request: rubygem-clouddb - Ruby interface into the Rackspace Cloud DB service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853514 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821233] Review Request: vdr-live - An interactive web interface for VDR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233 MartinKG mgans...@alice.de changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||874238 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 859675] Review Request: wcd - chdir for DOS and Unix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859675 --- Comment #24 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874249] New: Review Request: rubygem-inifile - INI file reader and writer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874249 Bug ID: 874249 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: rubygem-inifile - INI file reader and writer Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: dpie...@redhat.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-inifile.spec SRPM URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-inifile-2.0.2-1.fc17.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4663474 Description: Although made popular by Windows, INI files can be used on any system thanks to their flexibility. They allow a program to store configuration data, which can then be easily parsed and changed. Two notable systems that use the INI format are Samba and Trac. Fedora Account System Username: mcpierce -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874105] Review Request: qpid-proton - Proton is a high performance, lightweight messaging library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874105 Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858841] Review Request: owncloud - Private file sync and share server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858841 --- Comment #27 from Gregor Tätzner gre...@freenet.de --- Guys, did you spotted /owncloud/lib/MDB2/Driver/... ? They have their own sqlite driver included. I'm not sure where did that came from. Is it some sort of fork? If yes, I could move it to the owncloud-sqlite subpackage. So for the moment, I can just drop the req to php-pear-MDB2-Driver-sqlite without disabling sqlite (In reply to comment #26) So the sqlite sub package could probably be dropped. We still want a sqlite subpackage in order to not pull in mysql or postgresql -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 756321] Review Request: csmith - Tool to generate random C programs for compiler testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321 --- Comment #20 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com --- Hmmm, that results in the main csmith package creating both /usr/share/doc/csmith and /usr/share/doc/csmith-2.1.0. Can you get all of the documentation files into one or the other? Also, the BuildRoot tag in the spec file is unnecessary. I recommend deleting it. This MUST item has not been addressedd: [!]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. Everything else looks good. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865535] Review Request: python-datanommer-models - SQLAlchemy models for datanommer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865535
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Mario, I thought I wrote a note to the list but it must have gotten lost in
the tubes.. perhaps queued for moderation?
Either way, do you think my removal of the explicit Conflicts tag is
acceptable?
I think it's OK. Well, not really canonical, but I hope you will deprecate
datanommer in the foreseeable future ;)
Scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4663561
$ rpmlint -i -v *
python-datanommer-models.src: I: checking
python-datanommer-models.src: I: checking-url
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/datanommer.models (timeout 10 seconds)
python-datanommer-models.src: I: checking-url
http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/d/datanommer.models/datanommer.models-0.2.0.tar.gz
(timeout 10 seconds)
python-datanommer-models.noarch: I: checking
python-datanommer-models.noarch: I: checking-url
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/datanommer.models (timeout 10 seconds)
python-datanommer-models.spec: I: checking-url
http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/d/datanommer.models/datanommer.models-0.2.0.tar.gz
(timeout 10 seconds)
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
No issues.
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
GPLv3+
[+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it
is used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream URL can be
specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to
deal with this.
$ sha256sum *
57f9486bea0c3854e6ca8dbdb454737bff6ab54083f1264795eacab6bd527d33
datanommer.models-0.2.0.tar.gz
57f9486bea0c3854e6ca8dbdb454737bff6ab54083f1264795eacab6bd527d33
datanommer.models-0.2.0.tar.gz.orig
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line.
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for
any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
[.] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific
situations)
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable
[Bug 869088] Review Request: latte-integrale - Lattice point enumeration
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869088 Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo? | --- Comment #3 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com --- Yes, this package is intended only for Fedora 18 and beyond. I wasn't aware of the cddlib situation; thanks for pointing that out. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 873793] Review Request: skb - Simple keyboard layout indicator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873793
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
||m
--- Comment #3 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
Scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4663991
$ rpmlint -i -v *
skb.src: I: checking
skb.src: I: checking-url http://plhk.ru/ (timeout 10 seconds)
skb.src: I: checking-url http://plhk.ru/static/skb/skb-0.4.tar.gz (timeout 10
seconds)
skb.i686: I: checking
skb.i686: I: checking-url http://plhk.ru/ (timeout 10 seconds)
skb.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/skb-0.4/LICENSE
The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or
misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file,
possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF.
skb.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary skb
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
skb.x86_64: I: checking
skb.x86_64: I: checking-url http://plhk.ru/ (timeout 10 seconds)
skb.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/skb-0.4/LICENSE
The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or
misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file,
possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF.
skb.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary skb
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
skb-debuginfo.i686: I: checking
skb-debuginfo.i686: I: checking-url http://plhk.ru/ (timeout 10 seconds)
skb-debuginfo.i686: E: empty-debuginfo-package
This debuginfo package contains no files. This is often a sign of binaries
being unexpectedly stripped too early during the build, rpmbuild not being
able to strip the binaries, the package actually being a noarch one but
erratically packaged as arch dependent, or something else. Verify what the
case is, and if there's no way to produce useful debuginfo out of it, disable
creation of the debuginfo package.
skb-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking
skb-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking-url http://plhk.ru/ (timeout 10 seconds)
skb-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package
This debuginfo package contains no files. This is often a sign of binaries
being unexpectedly stripped too early during the build, rpmbuild not being
able to strip the binaries, the package actually being a noarch one but
erratically packaged as arch dependent, or something else. Verify what the
case is, and if there's no way to produce useful debuginfo out of it, disable
creation of the debuginfo package.
skb.spec: I: checking-url http://plhk.ru/static/skb/skb-0.4.tar.gz (timeout 10
seconds)
5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 2 warnings.
Due to that CFLAGS is hardcoded in config.mk, the debuginfo packages are empty.
Call make as follows:
make CFLAGS=%{optflags} %{?_smp_mflags}
This should help to fix the issue. Moreover, the %{_prefix} macro is senseless,
because it is the default and the Makefile points to /usr anyway.
Regarding the incorrect FSF address: Don't touch it. Just inform the upstream
developer about the outdated address so that he can fix it in future releases.
(In reply to comment #1)
- libX11-devel can be omitted
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRequires
No it can't be omitted. It is needed for building the package and is not part
of the basic build environment:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Exceptions_2
Indeed, the description could be more informative. But the upstream developer
is very thriftily with additional info, and there seems to be no package in
other distributions where we could borrow the description from. In this case,
we can leave it as is. Anyway, if you have some idea to tweak it, do it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874238] Review Request: DOM Tooltip (aka domTT) is a Javascript widget
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874238 --- Comment #1 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de --- Spec URL: https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/VDR/vdr-live/domtt-0.7.3-2/domtt.spec?a=NRE0_kqpfSs SRPM URL: https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/VDR/vdr-live/domtt-0.7.3-2/domtt-0.7.3-2.fc17.src.rpm?a=8NoeyePoKEs %changelog * Wed Nov 7 2012 Martin Gansser linux4martin[at]gmx.de - 0.7.3-2 - added js files -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821917] Review Request: mu - maildir utility with Emacs support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821917 --- Comment #10 from Jos de Kloe josdek...@gmail.com --- Thanks for updating. rpmbuild and mock results look fine again, and rpmlint outputs are identical to your 0.9.902 version. Looking at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Emacs (section 1.4 package contents), the Why package the source elisp? note says that the main purpose of the elisp package is to get help on variables and provide debugging information on the *.elc files. Therefore the emacs-mu4e-el is only useful for this purpose when emacs-mu4e is installed as well, so adding the directory ownership to emacs-mu4e is fine I think. Thinking about this, I think emacs-mu4e-el should explicitely require emacs-mu4e. I inspected randomly two other packages that package emacs extensions and they do this as well (looked at mercurial and gnuplot). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865371] Review Request : SciD is a collection of numerical routines using Blas/Lapack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865371 Jos de Kloe josdek...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||josdek...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Jos de Kloe josdek...@gmail.com --- Your srpm and spec file seem no longer available. Could you make them available again please? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858841] Review Request: owncloud - Private file sync and share server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858841 --- Comment #28 from Matthew Miller mat...@redhat.com --- (In reply to comment #27) Guys, did you spotted /owncloud/lib/MDB2/Driver/... ? They have their own sqlite driver included. I'm not sure where did that came from. Is it some sort of fork? If yes, I could move it to the owncloud-sqlite subpackage. I dunno. I'm just looking at the dependencies in the spec file. But if it's some sort of fork, we should look at whether it should be unbundled. (In reply to comment #26) So the sqlite sub package could probably be dropped. We still want a sqlite subpackage in order to not pull in mysql or postgresql +1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865371] Review Request : SciD is a collection of numerical routines using Blas/Lapack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865371 --- Comment #2 from MERCIER Jonathan bioinfornat...@gmail.com --- yes sorry they just move to a subdirectory http://bioinfornatics.fedorapeople.org/packages/scid.spec http://bioinfornatics.fedorapeople.org/packages/scid-1-0.20120429git51236f3.fc17.1.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 846008] Review Request: dsqlite - DSQLite is a Hight level library for SQLite in D programming
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846008 --- Comment #15 from MERCIER Jonathan bioinfornat...@gmail.com --- little typo into french description bibliotheque - bibliothèque language - langage -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 856238] Review Request: scratch - Programming language learning environment for stories, games, music and art
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856238 Matthew Miller mat...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||861633 --- Comment #18 from Matthew Miller mat...@redhat.com --- Fedora Legal has cleared the license as is. I've made an updated package which assumes the squeak-vm in progress. This works with the latest from bug #861633, with the caveat that you might need to edit /usr/bin/squeak to say lib64. Audio works and everything. Hopefully that package will land soon. In the meantime: Spec URL: http://mattdm.org/misc/fedora/scratch.spec SRPM URL: http://mattdm.org/misc/fedora/scratch-1.4.0.7-4.fc18.mattdm.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 846008] Review Request: dsqlite - DSQLite is a Hight level library for SQLite in D programming
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846008 --- Comment #16 from MERCIER Jonathan bioinfornat...@gmail.com --- about unused-direct-shlib-dependency is maybe a ldc bug i wait upstream https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/issues/228 so you can skip this as the bug is part of ldc an will be fixed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 818457] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-debug-base19 - Fast Ruby debugger - core component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818457 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- rubygem-ruby-debug19-0.11.6-3.fc17, rubygem-ruby-debug-base19-0.11.26-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 818458] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-debug19 - Command line interface (CLI) for ruby-debug-base
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818458 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- rubygem-ruby-debug19-0.11.6-3.fc17, rubygem-ruby-debug-base19-0.11.26-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848388] Review Request: liblognorm - Tool to normalize log data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848388 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- liblognorm-0.3.4-4.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848388] Review Request: liblognorm - Tool to normalize log data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848388 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874105] Review Request: qpid-proton - Proton is a high performance, lightweight messaging library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874105
Sébastien Boisvert s...@boisvert.info changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@boisvert.info
--- Comment #1 from Sébastien Boisvert s...@boisvert.info ---
This is not a formal review as I am not sponsored yet.
$ rpmlint qpid-proton-*rpm
qpid-proton.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libqpid-proton.so.1.0.0
exit@GLIBC_2.2.5
qpid-proton.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/libqpid-proton.so
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Not sure why rpmlint says that %{_libdir}/libqpid-proton.so* should to in
devel.
Builds fine with mock.
mock -r fedora-17-x86_64 rebuild qpid-proton-0.2-1.fc17.src.rpm mock.qp
When I install qpid-proton and do man proton, I get this in DESCRIPTION:
/home/seb/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/qpid-proton-0.2-1.fc17.x86_64/usr/bin/proton:
error while loading shared libraries: libqpid-proton.so.1: can‐
not open shared object file: No such file or directory
Same with man proton-dump.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865371] Review Request : SciD is a collection of numerical routines using Blas/Lapack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865371
Sébastien Boisvert s...@boisvert.info changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@boisvert.info
--- Comment #3 from Sébastien Boisvert s...@boisvert.info ---
*This is not a formal review because I am not sponsored yet.
Small mispelling / erreur d'ortographe:
SciD est une collection de fonction numériques et de lien écrit enet pour le
de lien écrit en et pour le
Summary:It is a hcollection of numerical routines for D language
collection
. /build lib %{_d_optflags}
pid_list=( ${pid_list[@]} ${!})
Is it useful to start process in background and then wait for them to finish ?
Builds fine with mock.
rpmlint throws a few warnings:
$ rpmlint scid.spec
scid.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: scid-20120429git51236f3.tar.xz
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
$ rpmlint scid-*.rpm
scid.x86_64: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found fr_FR
scid.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libscid-ldc.so.1.0.0
scid.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libscid-ldc.so.1.0.0
exit@GLIBC_2.2.5
scid.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libscid-ldc.so.1.0.0
exit@@GLIBC_2.2.5
scid-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) hcollection - collection,
h collection, collectible
scid-devel.x86_64: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found fr
scid-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
$ rpmlint scid scid-devel
scid.x86_64: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found fr_FR
scid.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libscid-ldc.so.1.0.0
scid.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libscid-ldc.so.1.0.0
__data_start
scid.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libscid-ldc.so.1.0.0
_Dmain
scid.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libscid-ldc.so.1.0.0
/lib64/librt.so.1
scid.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libscid-ldc.so.1.0.0
/lib64/libdl.so.2
scid.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libscid-ldc.so.1.0.0
/lib64/libpthread.so.0
scid.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libscid-ldc.so.1.0.0
/lib64/libm.so.6
scid.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libscid-ldc.so.1.0.0
exit@GLIBC_2.2.5
scid.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libscid-ldc.so.1.0.0
exit@@GLIBC_2.2.5
scid-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) hcollection - collection,
h collection, collectible
scid-devel.x86_64: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found fr
scid-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 11 warnings.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 838775] Review Request: ghc-css-text - CSS parser and renderer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838775 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_DEV |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 838775] Review Request: ghc-css-text - CSS parser and renderer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838775 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ghc-css-text-0.1.1-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-css-text-0.1.1-1.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 838775] Review Request: ghc-css-text - CSS parser and renderer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838775 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ghc-css-text-0.1.1-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-css-text-0.1.1-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
