[Bug 848388] Review Request: liblognorm - Tool to normalize log data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848388 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- liblognorm-0.3.4-4.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/liblognorm-0.3.4-4.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858841] Review Request: owncloud - Private file sync and share server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858841 --- Comment #29 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- As I understand, this is not a fork, but a new driver (MDB2_Driver_sqlite3). Of course, it will be great to have this one propose as a new PEAR extension (we probably should encourage upstream to do this). So, for now, I don't see any need to unbundle something which is not bundled. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857487] Review Request: ht-alegreya-fonts - A Serif typeface originally intended for literature
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857487 Daiki Ueno du...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2012-11-08 01:45:26 --- Comment #13 from Daiki Ueno du...@redhat.com --- Closing as it has been pushed to f18 stable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 818457] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-debug-base19 - Fast Ruby debugger - core component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818457 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- rubygem-ruby-debug19-0.11.6-3.fc18, rubygem-ruby-debug-base19-0.11.26-3.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 818458] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-debug19 - Command line interface (CLI) for ruby-debug-base
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818458 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- rubygem-ruby-debug19-0.11.6-3.fc18, rubygem-ruby-debug-base19-0.11.26-3.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865535] Review Request: python-datanommer-models - SQLAlchemy models for datanommer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865535 --- Comment #9 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com --- I will! (just have to wait on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865536 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865538 ) :) Thanks Mario! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865535] Review Request: python-datanommer-models - SQLAlchemy models for datanommer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865535 Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-datanommer-models Short Description: SQLAlchemy models for datanommer Owners: ralph Branches: f18 f17 el6 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858841] Review Request: owncloud - Private file sync and share server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858841 --- Comment #30 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- I could move it to the owncloud-sqlite subpackage Yes. And please requires php-sqlite3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874238] Review Request: DOM Tooltip (aka domTT) is a Javascript widget
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874238 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com --- you should drop BuildRequires (as there is no build) and also requirement firefox, which basically makes no sense. Also a suggestion: is it useful to provide a httpd-config snippet for e.g. apache httpd? If yes, you must add a dependency to httpd, which is not exactly what you'd require for vdr-live (because that depends on tntnet). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 873738] Review Request: sequence-library - Textual diff and merge library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873738
Ismael Olea ism...@olea.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(ism...@olea.org) |
--- Comment #4 from Ismael Olea ism...@olea.org ---
(In reply to comment #2)
1. Pre-release packages should have the .svnXXX suffix in Release field, not
in Version. They should be Version: 1.0.2 and Release: 0.1.svn20121003.
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages
Fixed. I can't believe I did it so wrong.
2. License tag is wrong. Should be License: Sequence
See: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2012-November/002003.html
Fixed.
3. Javadoc package should not require the main package.
Fixed.
4. According this comment:
# I really don't understand why _mavendepmapdir doesn't work as expected:
#%{_mavendepmapdir}
It should be %{_mavendepmapfragdir}
Seems I've been using outdated macros. Fixed.
5. License file should be installed with javadoc package too.
Fixed.
6. %update_maven_depmap is unneeded. %post and %postun scriplets should be
removed (along with corresponding Requires).
Fixed.
7. Jar file should be installed unversioned, i.e. %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar.
Symlink should not be installed.
8. Uhe URL tag is supposed to be used by users, so it should contain address
of a home website, not SVN repo.
At the moment it's the more similar thing to a home website available.
9. Packages should use upstream build method. Upstream uses gradle. Is there
any reason to use ant with custom build.xml instead?
I understood gradle building does not fit with Fedora:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/java-devel/2012-September/004540.html
so I used the same approach here.
10. There is BuildRequires: jpackage-utils = 0:1.6. Fedora ships version
1.6 (or later) since 2004-12-01. IMO there is no reason for versioned
requires in this case.
Fixed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 873738] Review Request: sequence-library - Textual diff and merge library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873738
--- Comment #5 from Ismael Olea ism...@olea.org ---
(In reply to comment #3)
In case this is not pre-release package the svn part should be omited, so
Version: 1.0.2 and Release: 1.
This is the case. Fixed.
Also to note:
%add_maven_depmap JPP-%{name}.pom %{name}.jar
is equivalent to:
%add_maven_depmap
without any arguments. I would use the second one.
Fixed too.
Uploading to:
Spec URL: http://olea.org/tmp/omegat-fedora-feature/sequence-library.spec
SRPM URL:
http://olea.org/tmp/omegat-fedora-feature/sequence-library-1.0.2-1.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 870050] Review Request: mate-file-manager-open-terminal - Mate-file-manager extension for an open terminal shortcut
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870050 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-11-08 02:36:41 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 873454] Review Request: mate-image-viewer - Eye of MATE image viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873454 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||mate-image-viewer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 873454] Review Request: mate-image-viewer - Eye of MATE image viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873454 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 873454] Review Request: mate-image-viewer - Eye of MATE image viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873454 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- mate-image-viewer-1.5.0-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mate-image-viewer-1.5.0-2.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874238] Review Request: DOM Tooltip (aka domTT) is a Javascript widget
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874238 --- Comment #3 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de --- (In reply to comment #2) you should drop BuildRequires (as there is no build) and also requirement firefox, which basically makes no sense. Also a suggestion: is it useful to provide a httpd-config snippet for e.g. apache httpd? If yes, you must add a dependency to httpd, which is not exactly what you'd require for vdr-live (because that depends on tntnet). not totally clear why i should provide a httpd-config file ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874238] Review Request: DOM Tooltip (aka domTT) is a Javascript widget
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874238 --- Comment #4 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de --- Spec URL: https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/VDR/vdr-live/domtt-0.7.3-3/domtt.spec?a=MuFtihFw6k0 SRPM URL: https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/VDR/vdr-live/domtt-0.7.3-3/domtt-0.7.3-3.fc18.src.rpm?a=Eq0eAy_FzmU %changelog * Thu Nov 8 2012 Martin Gansser linux4martin[at]gmx.de - 0.7.3-3 - Dropped BuildRequires and Requires because there is no build -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858841] Review Request: owncloud - Private file sync and share server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858841 --- Comment #31 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- Created attachment 640645 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=640645action=edit phpci-fullreport.txt Output result of phpci print --report full --recursive owncloud Note: This eport only detects known extensions (and there is some it doesn't know yet), and can have false positive. So according to it, requires should be (at least) php-curl php-date php-dom php-exif php-fileinfo php-filter (Warning: not yet available on RHEL) php-gd php-gmp php-iconv php-json php-ldap php-mbstring php-openssl php-pcre php-pdo php-session php-simplexml php-spl php-zip # optional php-bcmath Ignored : php-pgsql, php-mysql, php-sqlite3 moved to sub-package Ignored : php-xml (this extension is provided by php-common and is also a package which provides others extension... yes this is ugly) From the code, I don't see any need for php-posix. Note: it is better to request extension rather than package, as this could change in the future. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874238] Review Request: DOM Tooltip (aka domTT) is a Javascript widget
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874238 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com --- (In reply to comment #3) not totally clear why i should provide a httpd-config file ? Maybe to make this more usable for others? Without that, nobody can use it e.g from their web pages. But: it is just a question/suggestion, not a requirement. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858841] Review Request: owncloud - Private file sync and share server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858841 --- Comment #32 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- So, for sqlite sub package (probably a better name would be sqlite3), requires should be. php-pcre php-sqlite3 php-pear(MDB2) Note : it is also preferable to use php-pear(xxx) rather than php-pear-xxx. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 873454] Review Request: mate-image-viewer - Eye of MATE image viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873454 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- mate-image-viewer-1.4.0-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mate-image-viewer-1.4.0-1.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 873454] Review Request: mate-image-viewer - Eye of MATE image viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873454 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- mate-image-viewer-1.5.0-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mate-image-viewer-1.5.0-2.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874472] New: Review Request: knopflerfish - Open Source OSGi Service Platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874472 Bug ID: 874472 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: knopflerfish - Open Source OSGi Service Platform Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: punto...@libero.it Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/knopflerfish/3.4.0/knopflerfish.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/knopflerfish/3.4.0/knopflerfish-3.4.0-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: The Knopflerfish OSGi framework is a complete, open source, OSGi R4 framework. Fedora Account System Username: gil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 866901] Review Request: gogui - GUI to play game of Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866901
--- Comment #18 from Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr ---
- The sed syntax has been change without the cat
Almost:
cat config/%{name}.thumbnailer | sed
s;/usr/bin/%{name}-thumbnailer;$PREFIX/bin/%{name}-thumbnailer;
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874472] Review Request: knopflerfish - Open Source OSGi Service Platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874472 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858841] Review Request: owncloud - Private file sync and share server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858841 --- Comment #33 from Gregor Tätzner gre...@freenet.de --- (In reply to comment #30) I could move it to the owncloud-sqlite subpackage Yes. And please requires php-sqlite3 done, do you excuse, if I don't upload a new package for every little change another open point is 3rdparty/phpass. I'm hesitating to unbundle it, because it looks like an abandoned and unmaintained lib. The last release was over 2 years ago. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 846008] Review Request: dsqlite - DSQLite is a Hight level library for SQLite in D programming
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846008 --- Comment #17 from Christophe Burgun jo...@fedoraproject.org --- I have change the summary new urls : SPEC: http://jouty.fedorapeople.org/dsqlite.spec SRPM: http://jouty.fedorapeople.org/dsqlite-1.0-2.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 870978] Review Request: libcdio-paranoia - CD paranoia on top of libcdio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870978 Frantisek Kluknavsky fkluk...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Frantisek Kluknavsky fkluk...@redhat.com --- Package is fit for Fedora. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 839653] Review Request: rubygem-slim - Slim is a template language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- rubygem-slim-1.2.2-8.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-slim-1.2.2-8.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 839653] Review Request: rubygem-slim - Slim is a template language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 839653] Review Request: rubygem-slim - Slim is a template language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- rubygem-slim-1.2.2-8.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-slim-1.2.2-8.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874472] Review Request: knopflerfish - Open Source OSGi Service Platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874472 --- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=400 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 852330] Review Request: hibernate - Relational persistence and query service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852330 Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com --- I've tested this package with jboss-as, works, therefore I'm approving. *** APPROVED *** Please request branches f17 and f18, but please DO NOT build any packages for these branches, because it'll break a lot of things. Build the package ONLY for Rawhide. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865535] Review Request: python-datanommer-models - SQLAlchemy models for datanommer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865535 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 852330] Review Request: hibernate - Relational persistence and query service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852330 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review+ | Flags||fedora-review? Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: hibernate Short Description: Relational persistence and query service Owners: gil Branches: f17 f18 InitialCC: java-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 852330] Review Request: hibernate - Relational persistence and query service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852330 Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 873738] Review Request: sequence-library - Textual diff and merge library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873738
--- Comment #6 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com ---
4. According this comment:
# I really don't understand why _mavendepmapdir doesn't work as expected:
#%{_mavendepmapdir}
It should be %{_mavendepmapfragdir}
Seems I've been using outdated macros. Fixed.
Not exactly what I meant. %{_mavendepmapfragdir} is the same as
%{_datadir}/maven-fragments, so you should replace:
%{_mavendepmapfragdir}
%{_datadir}/maven-fragments/%{name}
with
%{_mavendepmapfragdir}/%{name}
I understood gradle building does not fit with Fedora:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/java-devel/2012-September/004540.
html so I used the same approach here.
Right, that's fine then. For some reason I thought gradle had offline mode,
suitable to use in Fedora, seems not.
I'll submit a full review a bit later today.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 866901] Review Request: gogui - GUI to play game of Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866901 --- Comment #19 from Christophe Burgun jo...@fedoraproject.org --- I have change the sed in the prep section without cat too New links : SPEC : http://jouty.fedorapeople.org/gogui.spec SRPM : http://jouty.fedorapeople.org/gogui-1.4.6-7.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 852330] Review Request: hibernate - Relational persistence and query service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852330 --- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 871906] Review Request: plexus-components-pom - Plexus Components POM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871906 Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||Trivial -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 871909] Review Request: plexus-tools-pom - Plexus Tools POM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871909 Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||Trivial -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858841] Review Request: owncloud - Private file sync and share server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858841 --- Comment #34 from Gregor Tätzner gre...@freenet.de --- Spec URL: http://brummbq.fedorapeople.org/owncloud.spec SRPM URL: http://brummbq.fedorapeople.org/owncloud-4.0.8-5.fc17.src.rpm - reworked the php and pear dependencies - note also the new dist conditionals -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874238] Review Request: DOM Tooltip (aka domTT) is a Javascript widget
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874238 Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mru...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com --- I'll do the review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 839652] Review Request: rubygem-colored - Add some color to your life
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839652 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 839652] Review Request: rubygem-colored - Add some color to your life
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839652 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- rubygem-colored-1.2-4.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-colored-1.2-4.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 839652] Review Request: rubygem-colored - Add some color to your life
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839652 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- rubygem-colored-1.2-4.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-colored-1.2-4.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 855529] Review Request: pygrib - Python module for reading and writing GRIB (editions 1 and 2) files (2)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855529 --- Comment #3 from Jos de Kloe josdek...@gmail.com --- I upgraded to upstream version 1.9.5 srpm and spec file are here: Spec URL: http://jdekloe.nl/Fedora/pygrib.spec SRPM URL: http://jdekloe.nl/Fedora/pygrib-1.9.5-1.fc17.src.rpm Changes: - update to upstream version 1.9.5 - add the doc files to the files list - activate the check section (and add pyproj as BR to make this work) mock and koji both successfully build the rpm's see: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4667582 Note that rawhide or f18 is needed to build this package since f17 does not have the right proj version. rpmlint results are: $ rpmlint pygrib-1.9.5-1.fc19.src.rpm pygrib.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US grib - brig, grub, grin pygrib.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gridded - griddle, ridged pygrib.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://pygrib.googlecode.com/files/pygrib-1.9.5.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. $ rpmlint pygrib-1.9.5-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm pygrib.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Cython - Python pygrib.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US grib - brig, grub, grin pygrib.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gridded - griddle, ridged pygrib.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary grib_list pygrib.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cnvgrib1to2 pygrib.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cnvgrib2to1 pygrib.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary grib_repack 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. $ rpmlint pygrib-debuginfo-1.9.5-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. The missing man-pages have been reported upstream, see: http://code.google.com/p/pygrib/issues/detail?id=62 Adapting to python3 is still on my wish list. I hope to find some time soon to do this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805666] Review Request: lldpd - Link Layer Discovery Protocol Daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805666 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(balajig81@gmail.c ||om) --- Comment #11 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- ping, ping, it's been awhile. i'll give another week or 2 before considering closing as a dead review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 860542] Review Request: kchildlock - KDE Parental Control Application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860542
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
Thanks
1. SHOULD use
%find_lang %{name} --with-kde
which will pick up %{_kde4_docdir} stuff automatically, and you can remove it
from %files
2. SHOULD fix
%{_localstatedir}/opt/%{name}
%{_localstatedir}/opt/%{name}/*
which is redundant, just use
%{_localstatedir}/opt/%{name}/
3. SHOULD use
%{_kde4_iconsdir}/hicolor/*/*/*
instead of
%{_kde4_iconsdir}/*
4. SHOULD use %{version} macro in Source url, which is currently,
Source0:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/kchildlock/kchildlock/0.90.4.2/kchildlock-0.90.4.2.tar.gz
as none of these are MUST blockers, APPROVED
do please try to address them prior to issuing any official builds.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 842124] Review Request: appmenu-qt - This package allows Qt to export its menus over DBus.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842124 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(damianatorrpm@gma ||il.com) --- Comment #15 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- Damian, ping? are you still able and interested in maintaining appmenu-qt? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 846481] Review Request: cantata - Client for the Music Player Daemon (MPD)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846481 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(alexisis-pristont ||a...@hotmail.com) --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- Can you please respond to my questions in comment #3 as well as highlight any remaining review blockers you see? thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832666] Review Request: kfaenza-icon-theme - Faenza-Cupertino Icon Theme for KDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832666 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(nlmin...@gmail.co ||m) --- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- ping, it's been a little while, you still able and interested in kfaenza-icon-theme ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874677] New: Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Rpc - Horde RPC API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874677 Bug ID: 874677 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Rpc - Horde RPC API Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: fed...@famillecollet.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/remicollet/remirepo/master/php/horde/php-horde-Horde-Rpc/php-horde-Horde-Rpc.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/php-horde-Horde-Rpc-2.0.1-1.remi.src.rpm Description: A common abstracted interface to various remote methods of accessing Horde functionality. Fedora Account System Username: remi -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 785606] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Test - Horde testing base classes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785606 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||874677 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874677] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Rpc - Horde RPC API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874677 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||n...@fedoraproject.org Depends On||785606 (horde-test) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874688] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Ldap - Horde LDAP libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874688 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||n...@fedoraproject.org Depends On||785606 (horde-test) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874688] New: Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Ldap - Horde LDAP libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874688 Bug ID: 874688 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Ldap - Horde LDAP libraries Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: fed...@famillecollet.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/remicollet/remirepo/master/php/horde/php-horde-Horde-Ldap/php-horde-Horde-Ldap.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/php-horde-Horde-Ldap-2.0.0-1.remi.src.rpm Description: A set of classes for connecting to LDAP servers and working with directory objects. Fedora Account System Username: remi -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 785606] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Test - Horde testing base classes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785606 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||874688 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874689] New: Review Request: libuv - Platform layer for node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874689 Bug ID: 874689 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: libuv - Platform layer for node.js Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: sgall...@redhat.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/packagereview/libuv/libuv.spec SRPM URL: http://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/packagereview/libuv/libuv-0.9.3-0.1.gitd56434a.fc18.src.rpm Description: libuv is a new platform layer for Node. Its purpose is to abstract IOCP on Windows and libev on Unix systems. We intend to eventually contain all platform differences in this library. Fedora Account System Username: sgallagh -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 815018] Review Request: nodejs - javascript fast build framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815018 Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||874689 --- Comment #44 from Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com --- For those interested, I've opened a review request for the Node.JS dependency libuv: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874689 This review request is from a git snapshot of the latest upstream sources including support for building libuv as a shared library. I will be submitting patches upstream shortly for Node.JS 0.9.3 to support linking with this version of libuv. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874689] Review Request: libuv - Platform layer for node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874689 Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||815018 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832666] Review Request: kfaenza-icon-theme - Faenza-Cupertino Icon Theme for KDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832666 Minh Ngo nlmin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(nlmin...@gmail.co | |m) | --- Comment #9 from Minh Ngo nlmin...@gmail.com --- Yes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874720] New: Review Request: python-anykeystore - A key-value store supporting multiple backends
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874720 Bug ID: 874720 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: python-anykeystore - A key-value store supporting multiple backends Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: rb...@redhat.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://ralph.fedorapeople.org//python-anykeystore.spec SRPM URL: http://ralph.fedorapeople.org//python-anykeystore-0.2-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: A generic interface wrapping multiple different backends to provide a consistent key-value storage API. This library is intended to be used by other libraries that require some form of generic storage. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874719] New: Review Request: zukitwo - Themes for GTK+2, GTK+3, Metacity, GNOME Shell and Xfwm4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874719 Bug ID: 874719 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: zukitwo - Themes for GTK+2, GTK+3, Metacity, GNOME Shell and Xfwm4 Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: mattia.meneguzzo+fed...@gmail.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://odysseus.fedorapeople.org/packages/Zukitwo/2012.11.08/zukitwo.spec SRPM URL: http://odysseus.fedorapeople.org/packages/Zukitwo/2012.11.08/zukitwo-20120817-2.fc17.src.rpm Description: The Zukitwo themes for GTK+2, GTK+3, Metacity, GNOME Shell and Xfwm4, created by lassekongo83. Fedora Account System Username: odysseus Note: This package was already reviewed and accepted. I have to request a new review because, after blocking it on some branches, I need to un-block it (see https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5387 ). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874720] Review Request: python-anykeystore - A key-value store supporting multiple backends
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874720 --- Comment #1 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com --- This package built on koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4668885 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874718] New: Review Request: zukini - Themes for GTK+2, GTK+3, Metacity and GNOME Shell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874718 Bug ID: 874718 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: zukini - Themes for GTK+2, GTK+3, Metacity and GNOME Shell Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: mattia.meneguzzo+fed...@gmail.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://odysseus.fedorapeople.org/packages/Zukini/2012.11.08/zukini.spec SRPM URL: http://odysseus.fedorapeople.org/packages/Zukini/2012.11.08/zukini-20120817-2.fc17.src.rpm Description: The Zukini themes for GTK+2, GTK+3, Metacity and GNOME Shell, created by lassekongo83. Fedora Account System Username: odysseus Note: This package was already reviewed and accepted. I have to request a new review because, after blocking it on some branches, I need to un-block it (see https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5387 ). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874721] New: Review Request: zukiwi - Themes for GTK+2, GTK+3, Metacity, GNOME Shell and Xfwm4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874721 Bug ID: 874721 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: zukiwi - Themes for GTK+2, GTK+3, Metacity, GNOME Shell and Xfwm4 Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: mattia.meneguzzo+fed...@gmail.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://odysseus.fedorapeople.org/packages/Zukiwi/2012.11.08/zukiwi.spec SRPM URL: http://odysseus.fedorapeople.org/packages/Zukiwi/2012.11.08/zukiwi-20120817-2.fc17.src.rpm Description: The Zukiwi themes for GTK+2, GTK+3, Metacity, GNOME Shell and Xfwm4, created by lassekongo83. Fedora Account System Username: odysseus Note: This package was already reviewed and accepted. I have to request a new review because, after blocking it on some branches, I need to un-block it (see https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5387 ). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865535] Review Request: python-datanommer-models - SQLAlchemy models for datanommer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865535 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865535] Review Request: python-datanommer-models - SQLAlchemy models for datanommer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865535 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-datanommer-models-0.2.0-6.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-datanommer-models-0.2.0-6.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874743] New: Review Request: perl-Unicode-EastAsianWidth - East Asian Width properties
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874743 Bug ID: 874743 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: perl-Unicode-EastAsianWidth - East Asian Width properties Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: tcall...@redhat.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://spot.fedorapeople.org/perl-Unicode-EastAsianWidth.spec SRPM URL: http://spot.fedorapeople.org/perl-Unicode-EastAsianWidth-1.33-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: This module provide user-defined Unicode properties that deal with width status of East Asian characters, as specified in http://www.unicode.org/unicode/reports/tr11/. Fedora Account System Username: spot -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832666] Review Request: kfaenza-icon-theme - Faenza-Cupertino Icon Theme for KDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832666 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- On the other hand, pretty much all of my comments are non-blockers (even the scriptlet thing, it's only an optimization). APPROVED i'll try to look things over again once you've imported it to be sure, and please do address all those SHOULD items prior to doing any official builds. thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865535] Review Request: python-datanommer-models - SQLAlchemy models for datanommer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865535 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-datanommer-models-0.2.0-6.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-datanommer-models-0.2.0-6.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865535] Review Request: python-datanommer-models - SQLAlchemy models for datanommer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865535 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-datanommer-models-0.2.0-6.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-datanommer-models-0.2.0-6.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 822283] Review Request: vim-omnicppcomplete - vim c++ completion omnifunc with a ctags database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822283 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rdie...@math.unl.edu Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 822283] Review Request: vim-omnicppcomplete - vim c++ completion omnifunc with a ctags database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822283 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 822283] Review Request: vim-omnicppcomplete - vim c++ completion omnifunc with a ctags database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822283
--- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses
found. Please check the source files for licenses manually.
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#ValidLicenseShortNames
= MUST items =
Generic:
[ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[ ]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries.
[ ]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
[ ]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[ ]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[ ]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[ ]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[ ]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses
found. Please check the source files for licenses manually.
[ ]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[ ]: Package does not generate any conflict.
Note: Package contains no Conflicts: tag(s)
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[ ]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[ ]: Package is not relocatable.
[ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: CheckResultdir
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[ ]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
Note: Test run failed
[ ]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Note: Test run failed
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
--requires).
[ ]: Package functions as described.
[ ]: Latest version is packaged.
[ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[ ]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
[!]: SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}.
Note: Source0 (omnicppcomplete-0.41.zip)
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[ ]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[ ]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[ ]: Packages should try to preserve
[Bug 847712] Review Request: mate-menus - Displays menus for MATE Desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847712 Dan McPherson dmcph...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kwood...@redhat.com --- Comment #17 from Dan McPherson dmcph...@redhat.com --- *** Bug 874722 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 867159] Review Request: zabbix20 - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867159 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- zabbix20-2.0.3-4.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/zabbix20-2.0.3-4.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 840109] Review Request: php-lessphp - A compiler for LESS written in PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840109
--- Comment #2 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Could you update to latest version 0.3.8 before I do a formal review ?
Updated
Some notes
- you don't have to compress the generated man page (will be done by
rpmbuild, and compression tool could change, one day)
Removed. I did not know about this. Thanks!
- tests are currently installed in /usr/share/php, which is in the default
include_path. There is no Guidelines about this, but I think it's a bad
practice.
Please consider moving to /usr/share/tests/php-lessphp
(you need to own /usr/share/tests or requires pear which own this dir)
I have tried several ways to do this but I cannot come up with a clean
solution (i.e. not hacking up the source and/or spec file). I will work with
upstream to hopefully come up with a way to do this in a future release.
- sed (to add shebang) is a bit hard to read.
Isn't simpler to use :
sed -e '1i#!/bin/bash\n' -i %{libname}/tests/bootstrap.sh
Fixed upstream via pull request :)
Spec URL: http://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SPECS/php-lessphp.spec
SRPM URL:
http://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SRPMS/php-lessphp-0.3.8-1.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865538] Review Request: datanommer-commands - Console commands for datanommer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865538 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co ||m QA Contact|extras...@fedoraproject.org |mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co ||m Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865536] Review Request: python-datanommer-consumer - Hub consumer plugin for datanommer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865536 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co ||m Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co ||m Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 818458] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-debug19 - Command line interface (CLI) for ruby-debug-base
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818458 Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2012-11-08 21:10:12 --- Comment #17 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org --- (In reply to comment #11) Hi Mamoru, Thanks for the packages. I see that you already retired rubygem-ruby-debug and rubygem-ruby-debug-base, but could you please also request RelEngs to block the packages? It would be nice to retire and block rubygem-linecache as well. Thank you. Filed: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5388 Closing this bug. Thank you, everyone. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 818458] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-debug19 - Command line interface (CLI) for ruby-debug-base
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818458 Bug 818458 depends on bug 818457, which changed state. Bug 818457 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ruby-debug-base19 - Fast Ruby debugger - core component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818457 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 818457] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-debug-base19 - Fast Ruby debugger - core component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818457 Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2012-11-08 21:11:09 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org --- Closing. Thank you for review and git procedure. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874904] New: Review Request: php-channel-drush - Adds php-channel-drush channel to PEAR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874904 Bug ID: 874904 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: php-channel-drush - Adds php-channel-drush channel to PEAR Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: shawn.iwin...@gmail.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SPECS/php-channel-drush.spec SRPM URL: http://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SRPMS/php-channel-drush-1.3-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: This package adds the php-channel-drush channel which allows PEAR packages from this channel to be installed. Fedora Account System Username: siwinski -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874905] New: Review Request: php-drush-drush - Command line shell and Unix scripting interface for Drupal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874905 Bug ID: 874905 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: php-drush-drush - Command line shell and Unix scripting interface for Drupal Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: shawn.iwin...@gmail.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SPECS/php-drush-drush.spec SRPM URL: http://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SRPMS/php-drush-drush-5.7.0-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Drush is a command line shell and Unix scripting interface for Drupal. If you are unfamiliar with shell scripting, reviewing the documentation for your shell (e.g. man bash) or reading an online tutorial (e.g. search for bash tutorial) will help you get the most out of Drush. Drush core ships with lots of useful commands for interacting with code like modules/themes/profiles. Similarly, it runs update.php, executes sql queries and DB migrations, and misc utilities like run cron or clear cache. Works with Drupal 6, Drupal 7, and usually Drupal 8. Fedora Account System Username: siwinski -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874905] Review Request: php-drush-drush - Command line shell and Unix scripting interface for Drupal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874905 Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||php-drush-drush -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874904] Review Request: php-channel-drush - Adds php-channel-drush channel to PEAR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874904 Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||php-channel-drush -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874905] Review Request: php-drush-drush - Command line shell and Unix scripting interface for Drupal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874905 Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||874904 (php-channel-drush) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874904] Review Request: php-channel-drush - Adds php-channel-drush channel to PEAR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874904 Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||874905 (php-drush-drush) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865535] Review Request: python-datanommer-models - SQLAlchemy models for datanommer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865535 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865535] Review Request: python-datanommer-models - SQLAlchemy models for datanommer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865535 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-datanommer-models-0.2.0-6.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 839653] Review Request: rubygem-slim - Slim is a template language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- rubygem-slim-1.2.2-8.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 839652] Review Request: rubygem-colored - Add some color to your life
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839652 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 839653] Review Request: rubygem-slim - Slim is a template language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 839652] Review Request: rubygem-colored - Add some color to your life
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839652 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- rubygem-colored-1.2-4.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874905] Review Request: php-drush-drush - Command line shell and Unix scripting interface for Drupal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874905 --- Comment #1 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com --- NOTE: This is a replacement package for drupal6-drush (http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/drupal6-drush.git/) because drupal6-drush was only designed (and named) for Drupal version 6 while Drush itself can be used for multiple versions of Drupal. The owner of the original drupal6-drush package (Anderson Silva ansi...@redhat.com) was contacted before submitting this package and agrees that this pkg should be its' successor. This package also uses the upstream preferred PEAR install method and the latest stable version of Drush. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 838775] Review Request: ghc-css-text - CSS parser and renderer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838775 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 838775] Review Request: ghc-css-text - CSS parser and renderer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838775 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ghc-css-text-0.1.1-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832831] Review Request: php-pirum-Pirum - A simple PEAR channel server manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832831 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-pirum-Pirum-1.1.4-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pirum-Pirum-1.1.4-2.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
