[Bug 877403] Review Request: svnkit - Pure Java Subversion client library

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877403

--- Comment #17 from Brendan Jones  ---
There's a typo in the patch. Change "USerLength" to "UserLength"

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 877403] Review Request: svnkit - Pure Java Subversion client library

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877403

--- Comment #16 from Brendan Jones  ---
Created attachment 653320
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=653320&action=edit
JNA patch getFieldOrder

Its at least a starting point of discussion with upstream. I've simply listed
the fields in the order they are in the class.

I haven't run the package.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 877403] Review Request: svnkit - Pure Java Subversion client library

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877403

--- Comment #15 from Brendan Jones  ---
I haven't tested this - but perhaps you could work it out. Here's a suggested
patch.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 723792] Review Request: python-flask-sqlalchemy - Adds sqlalchemy support to flask application

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723792

Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||bkab...@redhat.com

--- Comment #10 from Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda  ---
Hi Rahul, would it be possible to push the el6 build to bodhi, so that it can
be installed from the epel-testing repo?
Thanks.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 815018] Review Request: nodejs - javascript fast build framework

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815018

--- Comment #49 from Matthias Runge  ---
(In reply to comment #48)
> Awesome!  The only remaining issue with this packaging I see is the
> /usr/bin/node conflict with the node package.

[mrunge@turing ~]$ rpm -qlp node-0.3.2-8.fc15.x86_64.rpm 
/etc/ax25/node.conf

/usr/sbin/node
/usr/sbin/nodeusers


The node package puts shared data under /usr/share/ax25... so, I don't see a
file conflict there, but:

/usr/share/man/man5/node.conf.5.gz
/usr/share/man/man5/node.perms.5.gz
/usr/share/man/man8/node.8.gz

I guess, that's solvable. Current nodejs package has it's man page in man1:
[mrunge@turing ~]$ rpm -ql nodejs
/usr/bin/node
/usr/share/man/man1/node.1.gz

No conflict here, right?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 872957] Review Request: php-pear-XML-SVG - API for building SVG documents

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872957

Remi Collet  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #6 from Remi Collet  ---
Thanks for the review

New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: php-pear-XML-SVG
Short Description: API for building SVG documents
Owners: remi
Branches: f17 f18 el6 el5
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 875274] Review Request: python-velruse - Simplify third-party authentication for web applications

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875274

Ralph Bean  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2012-11-27 23:41:43

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 880882] Review Request: php-JsonSchema - PHP implementation of JSON schema

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880882

--- Comment #1 from Shawn Iwinski  ---
NOTE: Tests not included or run because Composer (http://getcomposer.org/)
required

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 880882] Review Request: php-JsonSchema - PHP implementation of JSON schema

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880882

Shawn Iwinski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Alias||php-JsonSchema

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 880882] New: Review Request: php-JsonSchema - PHP implementation of JSON schema

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880882

Bug ID: 880882
   Summary: Review Request: php-JsonSchema - PHP implementation of
JSON schema
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Reporter: shawn.iwin...@gmail.com

Spec URL: http://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SPECS/php-JsonSchema.spec

SRPM URL:
http://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SRPMS/php-JsonSchema-1.2.1-1.fc17.src.rpm

Description:
A PHP implementation for validating JSON structures against a given schema.

See http://json-schema.org for more details.


Fedora Account System Username: siwinski

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 880387] Review Request: python-pymongo - Python driver for MongoDB

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880387

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-pymongo-2.3-4.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-pymongo-2.3-4.fc18

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 851689] Review Request: mingw-libgsf - Library for reading and writing structured files

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851689

Michael Cronenworth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-review+

--- Comment #3 from Michael Cronenworth  ---
$ rpmlint mingw-libgsf.spec 
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

$ rpmlint ~/Downloads/mingw-libgsf-1.14.25-1.fc17.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

$ rpm -qp --requires
~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mingw32-libgsf-1.14.25-1.fc17.noarch.rpm
mingw32(kernel32.dll)  
mingw32(libbz2-1.dll)  
mingw32(libgdk_pixbuf-2.0-0.dll)  
mingw32(libgio-2.0-0.dll)  
mingw32(libglib-2.0-0.dll)  
mingw32(libgobject-2.0-0.dll)  
mingw32(libgsf-1-114.dll)  
mingw32(libintl-8.dll)  
mingw32(libxml2-2.dll)  
mingw32(msvcrt.dll)  
mingw32(zlib1.dll)  
mingw32-crt  
mingw32-filesystem >= 83
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1

$ rpm -qp --provides
~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mingw32-libgsf-1.14.25-1.fc17.noarch.rpm
mingw32(libgsf-1-114.dll)  
mingw32(libgsf-win32-1-114.dll)  
mingw32-libgsf = 1.14.25-1.fc17

$ md5sum Downloads/libgsf-1.14.25.tar.xz 
a66a2c6fc327bc62bebe3f988c4f45f3  Downloads/libgsf-1.14.25.tar.xz
[michael@melchior ~]$ md5sum rpmbuild/SOURCES/libgsf-1.14.25.tar.xz 
a66a2c6fc327bc62bebe3f988c4f45f3  rpmbuild/SOURCES/libgsf-1.14.25.tar.xz


+ OK
! Needs to be looked into
/ Not applicable
* Overridden by MinGW guidelines

[+] Files are installed in /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw
[+] BuildRequires: mingw32-filesystem >= xx is in the .spec file
[+] Requires are OK
[+] BuildArch: noarch
[+] No man pages or info files
[+] default strip and objdump commands are overridden with mingw32 specific
ones
[+] rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the
review
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines .
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL.
[+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one supported architecture.
[/] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for
any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional.
[+] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
[/] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just
symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in
%post and %postun. 
[/] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package.
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. 
[+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros
section of Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[/] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application.
[*] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[+] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[+] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'
(for directory ownership and usability).
[/] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in
a -devel package.
[/] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} =
%{version}-%{release}
[+] MUST: Packages 

[Bug 841266] Review Request: plink - whole genome association analysis toolset

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841266

--- Comment #9 from Ray Pete  ---
umm.. typo..

s/output R code/input R plugin code/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 841266] Review Request: plink - whole genome association analysis toolset

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841266

--- Comment #8 from Ray Pete  ---
Hi Volker,

So updated spec and srpm linked

Spec URL: www.iski.tv/plink.spec
SRPM URL: www.iski.tv/plink-1.07-1.fc17.src.rpm

I believe things are in better shape now.
Please let me know if you notice something missed? And tx for your help
reviewing

FYI, the R plugin is merely an option in the plink binary to output R code

http://pngu.mgh.harvard.edu/~purcell/plink/rfunc.shtml


Cheers,

Ray

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 880880] Review Request: php-scssphp - A compiler for SCSS written in PHP

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880880

Shawn Iwinski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Alias||php-scssphp

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 880880] New: Review Request: php-scssphp - A compiler for SCSS written in PHP

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880880

Bug ID: 880880
   Summary: Review Request: php-scssphp - A compiler for SCSS
written in PHP
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Reporter: shawn.iwin...@gmail.com

Spec URL: http://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SPECS/php-scssphp.spec

SRPM URL:
http://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SRPMS/php-scssphp-0.0.4-1.fc17.src.rpm

Description:
SCSS (http://sass-lang.com/) is a CSS preprocessor that adds many features like
variables, mixins, imports, color manipulation, functions, and tons of other
powerful features.

The entire compiler comes in a single class file ready for including in any
kind
of project in addition to a command line tool for running the compiler from the
terminal.

scssphp implements SCSS (3.1.20). It does not implement the SASS syntax, only
the SCSS syntax.


Fedora Account System Username: siwinski

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 876915] Review Request: erlang-emmap - Erlang mmap interface

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876915

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 876915] Review Request: erlang-emmap - Erlang mmap interface

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876915

--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
erlang-emmap-0-0.1.git8725d46.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 880387] Review Request: python-pymongo - Python driver for MongoDB

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880387

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 880387] Review Request: python-pymongo - Python driver for MongoDB

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880387

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-pymongo-2.3-3.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 879624] Review Request: jbossws-native - JBossWS Native

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879624

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
jbossws-native-4.1.0-3.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 879624] Review Request: jbossws-native - JBossWS Native

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879624

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 837668] Review Request: php-doctrine-DoctrineDBAL - Doctrine Database Abstraction Layer

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837668

--- Comment #4 from Shawn Iwinski  ---
- Updated to upstream version 2.3.0
- Added "%global pear_metadir" and usage in %install
- Added php-json require
- Updated %description
- PEAR package.xml fixes in %prep
- Changed RPM_BUILD_ROOT to %{buildroot}


Spec URL:
http://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SPECS/php-doctrine-DoctrineDBAL.spec

SRPM URL:
http://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SRPMS/php-doctrine-DoctrineDBAL-2.3.0-1.fc17.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 837666] Review Request: php-doctrine-DoctrineCommon - Doctrine Common PHP Extensions

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837666

--- Comment #5 from Shawn Iwinski  ---
(In reply to comment #4)

Correct changelog:
- Updated to upstream version 2.3.0
- Updated license from LGPLv2 to MIT
- Added "%global pear_metadir" and usage in %install
- Changed RPM_BUILD_ROOT to %{buildroot}

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 837666] Review Request: php-doctrine-DoctrineCommon - Doctrine Common PHP Extensions

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837666

--- Comment #4 from Shawn Iwinski  ---
- Updated to upstream version 2.3.0
- Added "%global pear_metadir" and usage in %install
- Added php-json require
- Updated %description
- PEAR package.xml fixes in %prep
- Changed RPM_BUILD_ROOT to %{buildroot}


Spec URL:
http://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SPECS/php-doctrine-DoctrineCommon.spec

SRPM URL:
http://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SRPMS/php-doctrine-DoctrineCommon-2.3.0-1.fc17.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 851689] Review Request: mingw-libgsf - Library for reading and writing structured files

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851689

Michael Cronenworth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@cchtml.com

--- Comment #2 from Michael Cronenworth  ---
Taking for review.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 880875] Review Request: python-fedmsg-meta-fedora-infrastructure - fedmsg metadata providers for Fedora Infrastructure's deployment

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880875

--- Comment #1 from Ralph Bean  ---
This package built on koji: 
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4735925

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 880875] New: Review Request: python-fedmsg-meta-fedora-infrastructure - fedmsg metadata providers for Fedora Infrastructure's deployment

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880875

Bug ID: 880875
   Summary: Review Request:
python-fedmsg-meta-fedora-infrastructure - fedmsg
metadata providers for Fedora Infrastructure's
deployment
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: unspecified
  Priority: unspecified
  Reporter: rb...@redhat.com


Spec URL:
http://ralph.fedorapeople.org//python-fedmsg-meta-fedora-infrastructure.spec
SRPM URL:
http://ralph.fedorapeople.org//python-fedmsg-meta-fedora-infrastructure-0.0.3-1.fc18.src.rpm

Description:
fedmsg metadata providers for Fedora Infrastructure's deployment

fedmsg  is a set of tools for knitting together
services and webapps into a realtime messaging net.  This package contains
metadata provider plugins for the primary deployment of that system:
Fedora Infrastructure .

If you were to deploy fedmsg at another site, you would like want to write
your own module like this one that could provide textual representations of
your messages.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 848990] Review Request: libnetfilter_acct - A library providing interface to extended accounting infrastructure

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848990

--- Comment #10 from Hushan Jia  ---
release number is bumped to 2.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 872957] Review Request: php-pear-XML-SVG - API for building SVG documents

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872957

Shawn Iwinski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |
  Flags||fedora-review+

--- Comment #5 from Shawn Iwinski  ---
=== APPROVED ===

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 872957] Review Request: php-pear-XML-SVG - API for building SVG documents

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872957

--- Comment #4 from Shawn Iwinski  ---
Created attachment 653201
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=653201&action=edit
php-pear-XML-SVG-review.txt

Generated by fedora-review 0.3.1 (b71abc1) last change: 2012-10-16
Buildroot used: fedora-17-x86_64
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 872957

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 872957] Review Request: php-pear-XML-SVG - API for building SVG documents

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872957

Shawn Iwinski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|shawn.iwin...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 815018] Review Request: nodejs - javascript fast build framework

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815018

--- Comment #48 from T.C. Hollingsworth  ---
(In reply to comment #45)
> I've spent the last couple weeks working with upstream to complete the
> unbundling process. I can now present to the world a copy of Node.js built
> entirely against system libraries!
> 
> Spec: http://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/packagereview/nodejs/nodejs.spec
> SRPM:
> http://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/packagereview/nodejs/nodejs-0.9.3-3.fc18.
> src.rpm
> 
> Built in Koji for Rawhide:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4706430

Awesome!  The only remaining issue with this packaging I see is the
/usr/bin/node conflict with the node package.

> Some notes: I'm not building npm in this tarball. It will be better to open
> a separate review for the upstream tarballs of npm located at
> https://github.com/isaacs/npm/tags. This tarball includes with it a number
> of modules and as such needs the care and feeding that a separate package
> provides.

Those modules should actually be packaged separately.  I'll revive my old npm
reviews and create new ones for the newly required modules soon.

> Thus, this package contains only the node binary and the manpage for it,
> properly linked against system libraries.
> 
> I'm not an expert in Node.js development. I've only tested that this binary
> works with some simple tutorial examples I found at www.nodebeginner.org.
> I'm certainly open to comaintainers helping me out here.

I have a general sense of how node software should be shipped in an RPM world
and already have automatic RPM dependency generation sorted out.  I'll work on
draft packaging guidelines for node packages and submit them to FPC.  I'll also
fix up the necessary RPM magic and macros and provide a patch to the new
packaging to include them.

(P.S.  I presently maintain http-parser and am working to update the ancient
version to the latest and greatest.  Please feel free to request ACLS in pkgdb
if you want/need them.)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 880863] Review Request: totpcgi - A centralized totp solution based on google-authenticator

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880863

--- Comment #1 from Nick Bebout  ---
I will review this (we are at the Infrastructure Security FAD)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 880863] Review Request: totpcgi - A centralized totp solution based on google-authenticator

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880863

Nick Bebout  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||n...@fedoraproject.org
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|n...@fedoraproject.org
  Flags||fedora-review?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 880863] New: Review Request: totpcgi - A centralized totp solution based on google-authenticator

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880863

Bug ID: 880863
   Summary: Review Request: totpcgi - A centralized totp solution
based on google-authenticator
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Reporter: mri...@gmail.com

Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~icon/f/totpcgi.spec
SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~icon/f/totpcgi-0.5.3-1.fc17.src.rpm
Description: 
A CGI/FCGI application to centralize google-authenticator deployments.
Fedora Account System Username: icon

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 880842] Review Request: pam_url - PAM module to authenticate with HTTP servers

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880842

--- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 874689] Review Request: libuv - Platform layer for node.js

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874689

--- Comment #8 from Orion Poplawski  ---
Also, this builds on el6 and would be nice to have there.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 880842] Review Request: pam_url - PAM module to authenticate with HTTP servers

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880842

--- Comment #4 from Konstantin Ryabitsev  ---
Sorry, let's do this instead -- I want herlo as co-maintainer, not as initialCC

New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: pam_url
Short Description: PAM module to authenticate with HTTP servers
Owners: icon herlo
Branches: f17 f18 el6
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 874689] Review Request: libuv - Platform layer for node.js

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874689

Orion Poplawski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||or...@cora.nwra.com

--- Comment #7 from Orion Poplawski  ---
Can we get updates for f17 and f18 please?  Thanks!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 880842] Review Request: pam_url - PAM module to authenticate with HTTP servers

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880842

Konstantin Ryabitsev  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mri...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #3 from Konstantin Ryabitsev  ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: pam_url
Short Description: PAM module to authenticate with HTTP servers
Owners: icon
Branches: f17 f18 el6
InitialCC: herlo

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 880842] Review Request: pam_url - PAM module to authenticate with HTTP servers

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880842

Nick Bebout  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |
  Flags||fedora-review+

--- Comment #2 from Nick Bebout  ---

Package Review
==

Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[x] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
 attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
 supported primary architecture.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
 are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
 Note: %defattr present but not needed
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
 in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
 for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
 "Unknown or generated". 1 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
 licensecheck in /home/nb/880842-pam_url/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: No %config files under /usr.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
 Note: Package contains no Conflicts: tag(s)
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: CheckResultdir
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
 in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
 Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 7 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
 from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
 --requires).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest

[Bug 880387] Review Request: python-pymongo - Python driver for MongoDB

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880387

--- Comment #9 from Andrew McNabb  ---
Mario, thanks for the helpful review.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 880387] Review Request: python-pymongo - Python driver for MongoDB

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880387

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-pymongo-2.3-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-pymongo-2.3-3.fc18

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 880387] Review Request: python-pymongo - Python driver for MongoDB

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880387

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 874905] Review Request: php-drush-drush - Command line shell and Unix scripting interface for Drupal

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874905

--- Comment #18 from Shawn Iwinski  ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> Btw, rpm --verify will report a corrupted installation, and yum reinstall is
> a workaround...

I would prefer to just put a note in the description about the replacement of
drupal6-drush and to use "yum reinstall" if there is an issue with the drush
command.  Not sure there are tons of installs for this package as compared to
PEAR ;)  Is this acceptable?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 880842] Review Request: pam_url - PAM module to authenticate with HTTP servers

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880842

--- Comment #1 from Nick Bebout  ---
I will review this.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 880842] Review Request: pam_url - PAM module to authenticate with HTTP servers

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880842

Nick Bebout  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||n...@fedoraproject.org
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|n...@fedoraproject.org
  Flags||fedora-review?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 880842] New: Review Request: pam_url - PAM module to authenticate with HTTP servers

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880842

Bug ID: 880842
   Summary: Review Request: pam_url - PAM module to authenticate
with HTTP servers
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: unspecified
  Reporter: i...@fedoraproject.org

Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~icon/f/pam_url.spec
SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~icon/f/pam_url-0.2-1.fc17.src.rpm
Description: 
The pam_url module enables you to authenticate users against a Web application,
such as totpcgi.
Fedora Account System Username: icon

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 880387] Review Request: python-pymongo - Python driver for MongoDB

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880387

--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 880387] Review Request: python-pymongo - Python driver for MongoDB

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880387

Andrew McNabb  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #6 from Andrew McNabb  ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: python-pymongo
Short Description: Python driver for MongoDB
Owners: amcnabb silas
Branches: f18
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 880387] Review Request: python-pymongo - Python driver for MongoDB

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880387

--- Comment #5 from Andrew McNabb  ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Requires:   %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
> 
> has to be 
> 
> Requires:   %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
> 
> because your package isn't noarch. I trust you that you'll change it before
> building the packages ;)

Done. Thanks.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 848990] Review Request: libnetfilter_acct - A library providing interface to extended accounting infrastructure

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848990

--- Comment #9 from Hushan Jia  ---
SPEC:
http://hushan.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/libnetfilter_acct.spec
SRPM:
http://hushan.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/libnetfilter_acct-1.0.0-1.fc16.src.rpm

I have fixed requires and buildrequires tag, and fix the el5 requirements,
please review.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 880387] Review Request: python-pymongo - Python driver for MongoDB

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880387

Mario Blättermann  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
   ||m
  Flags||fedora-review+

--- Comment #4 from Mario Blättermann  ---
Scratch build for Rawhide:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4734656

$ rpmlint -i -v *
python3-bson.i686: I: checking
python3-bson.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US traversable ->
traversal, traveler
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

python3-bson.i686: I: checking-url http://api.mongodb.org/python (timeout 10
seconds)
python3-bson.x86_64: I: checking
python3-bson.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US traversable ->
traversal, traveler
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

python3-bson.x86_64: I: checking-url http://api.mongodb.org/python (timeout 10
seconds)
python3-pymongo.i686: I: checking
python3-pymongo.i686: I: checking-url http://api.mongodb.org/python (timeout 10
seconds)
python3-pymongo.x86_64: I: checking
python3-pymongo.x86_64: I: checking-url http://api.mongodb.org/python (timeout
10 seconds)
python3-pymongo-gridfs.i686: I: checking
python3-pymongo-gridfs.i686: I: checking-url http://api.mongodb.org/python
(timeout 10 seconds)
python3-pymongo-gridfs.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.

python3-pymongo-gridfs.x86_64: I: checking
python3-pymongo-gridfs.x86_64: I: checking-url http://api.mongodb.org/python
(timeout 10 seconds)
python3-pymongo-gridfs.x86_64: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.

python-bson.i686: I: checking
python-bson.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US traversable ->
traversal, traveler
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

python-bson.i686: I: checking-url http://api.mongodb.org/python (timeout 10
seconds)
python-bson.x86_64: I: checking
python-bson.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US traversable ->
traversal, traveler
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

python-bson.x86_64: I: checking-url http://api.mongodb.org/python (timeout 10
seconds)
python-pymongo.src: I: checking
python-pymongo.src: I: checking-url http://api.mongodb.org/python (timeout 10
seconds)
python-pymongo.src: I: checking-url
http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/p/pymongo/pymongo-2.3.tar.gz (timeout 10
seconds)
python-pymongo.i686: I: checking
python-pymongo.i686: I: checking-url http://api.mongodb.org/python (timeout 10
seconds)
python-pymongo.x86_64: I: checking
python-pymongo.x86_64: I: checking-url http://api.mongodb.org/python (timeout
10 seconds)
python-pymongo-debuginfo.i686: I: checking
python-pymongo-debuginfo.i686: I: checking-url http://api.mongodb.org/python
(timeout 10 seconds)
python-pymongo-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking
python-pymongo-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking-url http://api.mongodb.org/python
(timeout 10 seconds)
python-pymongo-gridfs.i686: I: checking
python-pymongo-gridfs.i686: I: checking-url http://api.mongodb.org/python
(timeout 10 seconds)
python-pymongo-gridfs.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.

python-pymongo-gridfs.x86_64: I: checking
python-pymongo-gridfs.x86_64: I: checking-url http://api.mongodb.org/python
(timeout 10 seconds)
python-pymongo-gridfs.x86_64: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.

python-pymongo.spec: I: checking-url
http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/p/pymongo/pymongo-2.3.tar.gz (timeout 10
seconds)
15 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings.

Nothing of interest.

-
key:

[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-

[+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
ASL 2.0 and MIT
[+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing th

[Bug 848990] Review Request: libnetfilter_acct - A library providing interface to extended accounting infrastructure

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848990

--- Comment #8 from Mario Blättermann  ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT is needed for building el5 packages.

Yes, of course, but in this case you have to add more than that:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#EL5
You will need a BuildRoot tag and a %clean section, in addition to the initial
cleaning of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in %install.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 848990] Review Request: libnetfilter_acct - A library providing interface to extended accounting infrastructure

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848990

--- Comment #7 from Hushan Jia  ---
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT is needed for building el5 packages.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 880387] Review Request: python-pymongo - Python driver for MongoDB

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880387

--- Comment #3 from Andrew McNabb  ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The source tarball contains a bundled egg-info. Please remove it before
> building your package (in the %prep section):
> 
> rm -rf pymongo.egg-info

Done.

SRPM URL: http://aml.cs.byu.edu/~amcnabb/python-pymongo-2.3-2.fc17.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 874905] Review Request: php-drush-drush - Command line shell and Unix scripting interface for Drupal

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874905

--- Comment #17 from Remi Collet  ---
(In reply to comment #13)

> This will not fix users who do not update their drupal6-drush pkgs before
> upgrading to php-drush-drush though.  Perhaps I will still need to add a
> %triggerpostun? -- Remi?

Could be a good idea.
I have one in php-pear for some time for such an issue.

Btw, rpm --verify will report a corrupted installation, and yum reinstall is a
workaround...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 874905] Review Request: php-drush-drush - Command line shell and Unix scripting interface for Drupal

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874905

--- Comment #16 from Anderson Silva  ---
Here we go: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal6-drush

I tested the changes on rhel6 (replacing with php-drush-drush) and it seemed to
have worked well.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 875506] Review Request: python-fdb - Firebird RDBMS bindings for Python

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875506

--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-fdb-0.9.1-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-fdb-0.9.1-1.fc17

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 875506] Review Request: python-fdb - Firebird RDBMS bindings for Python

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875506

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 880763] New: Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880763

Bug ID: 880763
   Summary: Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: unspecified
  Priority: unspecified
  Reporter: s.bau...@gmx.net

SPEC:
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/3351272/Stuff/AudioCuesheetEditor/SPECS/AudioCuesheetEditor.spec
SOURCE:
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/3351272/Stuff/AudioCuesheetEditor/SOURCES/Audio%20Cuesheet%20Editor-src.tar.gz
SRPM: coming soon
RPM: coming soon

I would like to get AudioCuesheetEditor into Fedora packages. 

I also need a sponsor ;).

TODO:
 - check the package (no rpmlint or mock has been done yet)
 - desktop file

During rpmbuild -ba it says the following error:
Ausführung(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.QHzsie
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ '[' /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.0-1.fc17.x86_64
'!=' / ']'
+ rm -rf
/home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.0-1.fc17.x86_64
++ dirname
/home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.0-1.fc17.x86_64
+ mkdir -p /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT
+ mkdir
/home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.0-1.fc17.x86_64
+ cd AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.0
+ LANG=C
+ export LANG
+ unset DISPLAY
+ rm -rf
/home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.0-1.fc17.x86_64
+ /usr/bin/make install
DESTDIR=/home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.0-1.fc17.x86_64
make[1]: Entering directory
`/home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILD/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.0'
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILD/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.0'
make[1]: Entering directory
`/home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILD/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.0'
make pre-install-local-hook prefix=/usr/local
make[2]: Entering directory
`/home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILD/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.0'
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILD/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.0'
make install-satellite-assemblies prefix=/usr/local
make[2]: Entering directory
`/home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILD/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.0'
mkdir -p
'/home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.0-1.fc17.x86_64/usr/local/lib'
cp   bin/Release
/home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.0-1.fc17.x86_64/usr/local/lib/audiocuesheeteditor
cp: omitting directory `bin/Release'
make[2]: ***
[/home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.0-1.fc17.x86_64/usr/local/lib/audiocuesheeteditor]
Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILD/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.0'
make[1]: *** [install-local] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILD/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.0'
make: *** [install-recursive] Error 1
Fehler: Fehler-Status beim Beenden von /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.QHzsie (%install)


Fehler beim Bauen des RPM:
Fehler-Status beim Beenden von /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.QHzsie (%install)

I can build the application on my system with the standard:
./configure
make
make install

Could anybody help me? That would be fine :D!

Greets
Sven

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 880387] Review Request: python-pymongo - Python driver for MongoDB

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880387

Mario Blättermann  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
   ||m

--- Comment #2 from Mario Blättermann  ---
The source tarball contains a bundled egg-info. Please remove it before
building your package (in the %prep section):

rm -rf pymongo.egg-info

See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python_Eggs#Upstream_Eggs for more
information.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 878644] Review Request: openshift-origin-broker-util -Utility scripts for the OpenShift Origin broker

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878644

Troy Dawson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #2 from Troy Dawson  ---
Spec URL:
http://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/openshift-origin/openshift-origin-broker-util.spec
SRPM URL:
http://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/openshift-origin/openshift-origin-broker-util-1.1.8-3.fc18.src.rpm

Tmp
 working on merging that in.  It should be in the next release.

Requires:
 bind-utils - added
 curl - not added (needed by rpm, should be installed by default)
 rng-tools - added
 openssl - added
 openshift-broker - changed to openshift-origin-broker
Requesting to have these requires merged upstream
https://github.com/openshift/origin-server/pull/981

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 874905] Review Request: php-drush-drush - Command line shell and Unix scripting interface for Drupal

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874905

--- Comment #15 from Anderson Silva  ---
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4734177 ... I will test it
on my server later today, and then get other branches built as well

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 874905] Review Request: php-drush-drush - Command line shell and Unix scripting interface for Drupal

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874905

--- Comment #14 from Anderson Silva  ---
I can absolutely put that out there... I do wonder how many people actually use
this package :-)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 874905] Review Request: php-drush-drush - Command line shell and Unix scripting interface for Drupal

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874905

--- Comment #13 from Shawn Iwinski  ---
Anderson --

I believe it would be cleaner (and "better") to fix drupal6-drush's bin soft
link instead of me adding a %triggerpostun to this package.  Would you mind
releasing an update to drupal6-drush?  I forked the Fedora repo, made changes
these changes to the spec, and tested them successfully:
https://github.com/siwinski/drupal6-drush/commit/f4f62edafdd96f082676f7181107ebc742f55f92

This will not fix users who do not update their drupal6-drush pkgs before
upgrading to php-drush-drush though.  Perhaps I will still need to add a
%triggerpostun? -- Remi?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 880716] Review Request: knot - Authoritative DNS server

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880716

--- Comment #1 from Paul Wouters  ---
This is a continuation of the abandoned review rhbz#760177

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 880716] New: Review Request: knot - Authoritative DNS server

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880716

Bug ID: 880716
   Summary: Review Request: knot - Authoritative DNS server
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Reporter: pwout...@redhat.com

Spec URL: ftp://ftp.nohats.ca/knot/knot.spec
SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.nohats.ca/knot/knot-1.1.2-1.fc17.src.rpm
Description: KNOT DNS is a high-performance authoritative DNS server
implementation.
Fedora Account System Username: pwouters

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 879365] Review Request: system-config-network - network administration tool

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879365

--- Comment #1 from Bill Nottingham  ---
MUST items:
- Package meets naming and packaging guidelines - OK
- Spec file matches base package name. - OK
- Spec has consistant macro usage. - OK
- Meets Packaging Guidelines. - OK
- License - GPLv2+, via code
- License field in spec matches - OK
- License file included in package  - OK
- Spec in American English - OK
- Spec is legible. - OK
- Sources match upstream md5sum: 
0751d4bd7e59c32626ba92fb3c3ff13d9207792b555b2720c61f35eda048ddb5 
system-config-network-1.6.5.tar.bz2

? Can't find upstream.

- Package needs ExcludeArch - N/A
- BuildRequires correct - ***

glibc-devel and gcc doesn't need to be explicitly listed
In fact, this doesn't compile anything, so they're possibly wrong.
The version on the python req can likely be removed

- Spec handles locales/find_lang - OK
- Package is code or permissible content. - OK
- Doc subpackage needed/used. - N/A
- Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. - ***

What happens if the help isn't installed? Perhaps it shouldn't be %doc.

- Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. - N/A

- Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file - OK... until it's removed.

- Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.  - OK (tested x86_64)
- Package has no duplicate files in %files. - OK
- Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. - OK
- Package owns all the directories it creates. - OK
- No rpmlint output.

$ rpmlint system-config-network-tui-1.6.5-1.fc18.noarch.rpm 
system-config-network-tui.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-iwlib

OK.

system-config-network-tui.noarch: W: self-obsoletion redhat-config-network-tui
<= 1.6.5 obsoletes redhat-config-network-tui = 1.6.5

Weird. Shouldn't it be <, not <= ?

system-config-network-tui.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary
system-config-network-cmd
system-config-network-tui.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary
system-config-network
system-config-network-tui.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary
system-config-network-tui
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings.

Warnings, OK.

$ rpmlint system-config-network-1.6.5-1.fc18.noarch.rpm 
system-config-network.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided rp3

Hah. Should just remove this.

system-config-network.noarch: W: self-obsoletion redhat-config-network <= 1.6.5
obsoletes redhat-config-network = 1.6.5

See above.

system-config-network.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary
system-control-network
system-config-network.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary
system-config-network-gui

OK.

- final provides and requires are sane: ***

Requires:

initscripts >= 0:5.99

I think we don't need this version any more.

python

Given we have /usr/bin/python in requires (and rpm-python, and dbus-python, and
...), this is superfluous.

Provides:

internet-config = 0.40-2.1
isdn-config = 0.18-10.70.1
netcfg = 2.36-3p.1
netconf = 0.1-1.1
netconfig = 0.8.24-1.2.2.1.1

These are all *ancient*. Are they still required to be provided?

SHOULD Items:

- Should build in mock. - OK (tested x86_64)
- Should build on all supported archs - didn't check
- Should function as described.  - didn't check
- Should have sane scriptlets. - OK (none)
- Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. -
OK
- Should have dist tag - OK
- Should package latest version -OK, I guess

Suggestions:
1) Don't mark the help as %doc
2) Change the obsoletes from <= to <
3) Remove assorted obsoletes provides/requires

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 760177] Review Request: knot - Authoritative DNS server

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760177

Stanislav Petr  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |CANTFIX
Last Closed||2012-11-27 10:54:37

--- Comment #37 from Stanislav Petr  ---
This bug will be reopened by Ondřej Surý .

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 874905] Review Request: php-drush-drush - Command line shell and Unix scripting interface for Drupal

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874905

--- Comment #12 from Remi Collet  ---
> So, postun is doing an unlink on a good /usr/bin/drush
Yes... :(

A workaround could be to add a trigger to restore this file using a 
%triggerpostun -- drupal6-drush


Ugly...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 877403] Review Request: svnkit - Pure Java Subversion client library

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877403

--- Comment #14 from Ismael Olea  ---
1.7.6 fails too :-/

Reported at upstream: http://issues.tmatesoft.com/issue/SVNKIT-329

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 879903] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-armsoc - Xorg X11 armsocdrm driver

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879903

Peter Robinson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2012-11-27 09:29:25

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398

--- Comment #10 from Susi Lehtola  ---
Oh, I fixed the build issue on i386 and RHEL5 as well.

http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/openblas.spec
http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/openblas-0.2.5-2.fc18.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 879752] Review Request: xs-tools - OLPC XS Tools

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879752

--- Comment #4 from Alex  ---
why is this package marked as duplicate, is another student working on it?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 877403] Review Request: svnkit - Pure Java Subversion client library

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877403

--- Comment #13 from Ismael Olea  ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> I'm running into some build errors in fedora-rawhide-x86_64
> 
> Some logs for you here: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/reviews/svnkit/

Damn, jna has been updated to 3.5.0 and is broking this:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/java-devel/2012-November/004572.html

Seems there is a new release upstream but not checked yet if fix this :-/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 875506] Review Request: python-fdb - Firebird RDBMS bindings for Python

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875506

--- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 879928] Review Request: rigsofrods - Vehicle simulator based on soft-body physics

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879928

Bug 879928 depends on bug 880364, which changed state.

Bug 880364 Summary: Please update ogre platform to 1.8.1 version
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880364

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 879928] Review Request: rigsofrods - Vehicle simulator based on soft-body physics

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879928

Martin Preisler  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||873353

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 873787] Review Request: mate-document-viewer - Document viewer

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873787

leigh scott  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Last Closed||2012-11-27 05:51:47

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 879624] Review Request: jbossws-native - JBossWS Native

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879624

--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
jbossws-native-4.1.0-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jbossws-native-4.1.0-3.fc18

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 879624] Review Request: jbossws-native - JBossWS Native

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879624

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 875506] Review Request: python-fdb - Firebird RDBMS bindings for Python

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875506

Philippe Makowski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 853775] Review Request: gpick - Advanced color picker written in C++ using GTK+ toolkit

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853775

--- Comment #2 from Volker Fröhlich  ---
Added NEEDINFO

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 875359] Review Request: willie - a simple, lightweight, open source, easy-to-use IRC Utility bot, written in Python.

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875359

--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
willie-3.1.2-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 875359] Review Request: willie - a simple, lightweight, open source, easy-to-use IRC Utility bot, written in Python.

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875359

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 868717] Review Request: libtvdb - Library to retrieve TV series information from web

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868717

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 866325] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866325

--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System  ---
ugene-1.11.3-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 866325] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866325

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 868717] Review Request: libtvdb - Library to retrieve TV series information from web

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868717

--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
libtvdb-0.3.0-3.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 876915] Review Request: erlang-emmap - Erlang mmap interface

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876915

--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
erlang-emmap-0-0.1.git8725d46.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-emmap-0-0.1.git8725d46.el6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 876915] Review Request: erlang-emmap - Erlang mmap interface

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876915

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
erlang-emmap-0-0.1.git8725d46.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-emmap-0-0.1.git8725d46.fc18

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 876915] Review Request: erlang-emmap - Erlang mmap interface

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876915

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
erlang-emmap-0-0.1.git8725d46.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-emmap-0-0.1.git8725d46.fc17

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 876915] Review Request: erlang-emmap - Erlang mmap interface

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876915

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 815018] Review Request: nodejs - javascript fast build framework

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815018

--- Comment #47 from Matthias Runge  ---
(In reply to comment #46)
> This is great news. So Node.JS 0.10.x will be in the official repositories?

Current released version is v0.8.15, according to http://nodejs.org/

Once this package has been reviewed it'll be pushed into fedoras official
repositories. 

If 0.10.x will become part of Fedora's repositories (once, it's released), I'd
say, it depends on the fact, if it's packable. 

Until (mainly) Stephens' work, all node.js versions were not permitted to be
included into fedora for several reasons, mainly because of bundling libraries,
which is strictly prohibited in fedora.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 875698] Review Request: jbossws-common-tools - JBossWS Common Tools

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875698

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
jbossws-common-tools-1.1.0-5.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jbossws-common-tools-1.1.0-5.fc18

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 880155] Review Request: PackageKit-Qt - Qt support library for PackageKit

[bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880155

Richard Hughes  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Last Closed||2012-11-27 03:11:47
 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE

--- Comment #8 from Richard Hughes  ---
Thanks guys!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review