[Bug 881086] Review Request: rubygem-audited-activerecord - Log all changes to your ActiveRecord models
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881086 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- rubygem-audited-activerecord-3.0.0-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-audited-activerecord-3.0.0-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844152] Review Request: mate-file-manager - File manager for MATE
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844152 leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|leigh123li...@googlemail.co |dan.mas...@gmail.com |m | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844150] Review Request: mate-desktop - Shared code among mate-panel, mate-session, caja, etc
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844150 leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|leigh123li...@googlemail.co |dan.mas...@gmail.com |m | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 883362] New: Review Request: stilts - STOMP messaging framework
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883362 Bug ID: 883362 Summary: Review Request: stilts - STOMP messaging framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: mgold...@redhat.com Spec URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/stilts/0.1.28-1/stilts.spec SRPM URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/stilts/0.1.28-1/stilts-0.1.28-1.fc18.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: goldmann Description: Stilts is a STOMP-native messaging framework. It is not a message broker. It aims to address treating STOMP as primary contract for messaging, and integrating around it, instead of simply applying STOMP shims to existing services. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4754895 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 883362] Review Request: stilts - STOMP messaging framework
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883362 Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) --- Comment #1 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com --- Added license to packages. Spec URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/stilts/0.1.28-2/stilts.spec SRPM URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/stilts/0.1.28-2/stilts-0.1.28-2.fc18.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 883362] Review Request: stilts - STOMP messaging framework
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883362 --- Comment #2 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com --- Added newly built modules. Spec URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/stilts/0.1.28-3/stilts.spec SRPM URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/stilts/0.1.28-3/stilts-0.1.28-3.fc18.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 881903] Review Request: python-zope-interface4 - Forward compat package for Zope 3 Interface Infrastructure
Product: Fedora EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881903 Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-zope-interface4 Short Description: Forward compat package for ZOPE 3 Interface Infrastructure Owners: ralph Branches: el6 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 881903] Review Request: python-zope-interface4 - Forward compat package for Zope 3 Interface Infrastructure
Product: Fedora EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881903 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 876403] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess - Guess C++ compiler and flags
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876403 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jples...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jples...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 876403] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess - Guess C++ compiler and flags
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876403
--- Comment #2 from Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[-]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[-]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[-]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must
be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Perl:
[!]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires and Requires:.
Missing BR
perl(ExtUtils::Manifest)
perl(File::Path)
perl(File::Spec::Functions)
perl(Cwd)
perl(Fatal)
perl(Exporter)
[x]: CPAN urls should be non-versioned.
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
--requires).
[-]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
[x]: SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}.
Note: Source0 (ExtUtils-CppGuess-0.07.tar.gz)
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define.
= EXTRA items =
Generic:
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is
arched.
$ rpm -qp --provides perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess-0.07-2.fc19.noarch.rpm | sort |
uniq -c
1 perl(ExtUtils::CppGuess) = 0.07
1 perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess = 0.07-2.fc1
Provides are ok
$ rpm -qp --requires perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess-0.07-2.fc19.noarch.rpm | sort |
uniq -c
1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
1 perl(Capture::Tiny)
1 perl(Config)
1 perl(File::Basename)
1 perl(strict)
[Bug 883413] New: Review Request: java-dirq - Directory based queue
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883413 Bug ID: 883413 Summary: Review Request: java-dirq - Directory based queue Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: massimo.pala...@gmail.com Spec URL: http://mpaladin.web.cern.ch/mpaladin/rpms/java-dirq/java-dirq.spec SRPM URL: http://mpaladin.web.cern.ch/mpaladin/rpms/java-dirq/java-dirq-1.0-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: The goal of this module is to offer a simple queue system using the underlying file system for storage, security and to prevent race conditions via atomic operations. It focuses on simplicity, robustness and scalability. This module allows multiple concurrent readers and writers to interact with the same queue. A port of Perl module Directory::Queue and a Python dirq implementation of the same algorithm are available so readers and writers can be written in different programming languages. Fedora Account System Username: mpaladin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 881903] Review Request: python-zope-interface4 - Forward compat package for Zope 3 Interface Infrastructure
Product: Fedora EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881903 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 881903] Review Request: python-zope-interface4 - Forward compat package for Zope 3 Interface Infrastructure
Product: Fedora EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881903 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-zope-interface4-4.0.2-4.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-zope-interface4-4.0.2-4.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 883437] New: Review Request: rubygem-prawn - A fast and nimble PDF generator for Ruby
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883437 Bug ID: 883437 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-prawn - A fast and nimble PDF generator for Ruby Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: jstri...@redhat.com Spec URL: http://data-strzibny.rhcloud.com/rubygem-prawn.spec SRPM URL: http://data-strzibny.rhcloud.com/rubygem-prawn-0.12.0-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: Prawn is a fast, tiny, and nimble PDF generator for Ruby Fedora Account System Username: jstribny Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4755767 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 877705] Review Request: torsocks - Use SOCKS-friendly applications with Tor
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877705 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- torsocks-1.2-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/torsocks-1.2-2.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 879879] Review Request: moodle-xs - A Course Management System
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879879 --- Comment #13 from ben.har...@rackspace.com --- If your goal is just to create a rpm, I was able to create a rpm and install it within a mock environment based your source rpm. Getting this package to Fedora is a different story. First, I do not believe that development releases will qualify. Then you would need to work through any issues with stable release. As a student, are you able to fulfill the requirements of a package maintainer: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Understand_your_responsibilities In regards to failed items, the output of Fedora-Review Tool is fairly straight forward. Items marked '[!]' are failed items. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847160] Review Request: eclipse-m2e-core - Maven integration for Eclipse
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847160 Roland Grunberg rgrun...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jan.pub...@famvlug.nl --- Comment #7 from Roland Grunberg rgrun...@redhat.com --- *** Bug 814245 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 883472] New: Review Request: lnst - Linux Network Stack Test
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883472 Bug ID: 883472 Summary: Review Request: lnst - Linux Network Stack Test Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: rpazd...@redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xpazde00/soubory/lnst.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xpazde00/soubory/lnst-0.1-1.20121204git.fc16.src.rpm Description: Linux Network Stack Test is a toolkit that can be used for developing and performing automated network tests. LNST focuses on maximum portability of the so-called recipes (descriptions of test cases and scenarios). This is an initial snapshot (0.1) of lnst, which is still under active developement. I plan to update it with improvements and fixes on a regular basis. I am a member of the team that is developing LNST. Also I am new to packaging (this is my first package submision to Fedora), someone to sponsor me. --- koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4756147 --- rpmlint output: $ rpmlint lnst.spec lnst-0.1-1.20121204git.fc16.src.rpm lnst-common-0.1-1.20121204git.fc16.noarch.rpm lnst-ctl-0.1-1.20121204git.fc16.noarch.rpm lnst-slave-0.1-1.20121204git.fc16.noarch.rpm lnst-ctl.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/lnst/test_tools/multicast/sockopt_utils.h lnst-ctl.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/lnst/test_tools/multicast/offline/max_groups.c lnst-ctl.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/lnst/test_tools/multicast/igmp_utils.h lnst-ctl.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/lnst/test_tools/multicast/server/recv_source_membership.c lnst-ctl.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/lnst/test_tools/multicast/parameters_igmp.h lnst-ctl.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/lnst/test_tools/multicast/server/recv_membership.c lnst-ctl.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/lnst/test_tools/multicast/offline/sockopt_source_membership.c lnst-ctl.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/lnst/test_tools/multicast/offline/sockopt_block_source.c lnst-ctl.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/lnst/test_tools/multicast/offline/sockopt_membership.c lnst-ctl.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/lnst/test_tools/multicast/multicast_utils.h lnst-ctl.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/lnst/test_tools/multicast/client/send_simple.c lnst-ctl.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/lnst/test_tools/multicast/server/recv_block_source.c lnst-ctl.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/lnst/test_tools/multicast/parameters_multicast.h lnst-ctl.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/lnst/test_tools/multicast/offline/sockopt_ttl.c lnst-ctl.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/lnst/test_tools/multicast/client/send_igmp_query.c lnst-ctl.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/lnst/test_tools/multicast/server/recv_simple.c lnst-ctl.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/lnst/test_tools/multicast/offline/sockopt_loop.c lnst-ctl.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/lnst/test_tools/multicast/offline/sockopt_if.c 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 18 warnings. The package contains C source files and headers. These files are located in /usr/share/lnst/test_tools and they are distributed by lnst-ctl to the test machines, where they are compiled and used for testing. The files are required by lnst-ctl during it's runtime, although they are never compiled nor executed on the controller machine they are installed on. The controller will just distribute them to it's test slaves, so they can be used to perform tests. The same applies to python modules contained under /usr/share/lnst/test_modules (therefore they are not byte-compiled). Fedora Account System Username: rpazdera -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 883472] Review Request: lnst - Linux Network Stack Test
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883472 Radek Pazdera rpazd...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 883478] New: Review Request: python-logging-tree - Introspect and display the logger tree inside logging
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883478
Bug ID: 883478
Summary: Review Request: python-logging-tree - Introspect and
display the logger tree inside logging
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: rb...@redhat.com
Spec URL: http://ralph.fedorapeople.org//python-logging-tree.spec
SRPM URL: http://ralph.fedorapeople.org//python-logging-tree-1.1-1.fc18.src.rpm
Description:
Introspection for the ``logging`` logger tree in the Standard Library.
While you can write programs that call this package's ``tree()``
function and examine the hierarchy of logger objects that it finds
inside of the Standard Library ``logging`` module, the simplest use of
this package for debugging is to call ``printout()`` to print the
loggers, filters, and handlers that your application has configured::
logging.getLogger('a')
logging.getLogger('a.b').setLevel(logging.DEBUG)
logging.getLogger('x.c')
from logging_tree import printout
printout()
Level WARNING
|
o--a
| |
| o--a.b
| Level DEBUG
|
o--[x]
|
o--x.c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 877705] Review Request: torsocks - Use SOCKS-friendly applications with Tor
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877705 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- torsocks-1.2-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/torsocks-1.2-2.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 877705] Review Request: torsocks - Use SOCKS-friendly applications with Tor
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877705 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- torsocks-1.2-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/torsocks-1.2-2.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 883489] New: python-scikit-learn: Easy-to-use and general-purpose machine learning in Python
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883489 Bug ID: 883489 Summary: python-scikit-learn: Easy-to-use and general-purpose machine learning in Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: ozan.cagla...@gmail.com Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/ozancaglayan/rpmbuild/master/SPECS/python-scikit-learn.spec SRPM URL: http://ozancaglayan.com/fedora/SRPMS/python-scikit-learn-0.12.1-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: scikit-learn is a Python module integrating classic machine learning algorithms in the tightly-knit scientific Python world (numpy, scipy, matplotlib). It aims to provide simple and efficient solutions to learning problems, accessible to everybody and reusable in various contexts: machine learning as a versatile tool for science and engineering. Fedora Account System Username: ozancaglayan Koji build task: (f17) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4756310 -- This is one of my two waiting-for-review packages and I need a sponsor as I'm a newbie. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 883489] python-scikit-learn: Easy-to-use and general-purpose machine learning in Python
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883489 Ozan Çağlayan ozan.cagla...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ozan.cagla...@gmail.com Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 883501] New: Review Request: nepomuk-widgets - Nepomuk widgets collection
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883501 Bug ID: 883501 Summary: Review Request: nepomuk-widgets - Nepomuk widgets collection Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: rdie...@math.unl.edu Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kde4/nepomuk-widgets.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kde4/nepomuk-widgets-4.9.90-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: Nepomuk widgets Fedora Account System Username: rdieter this is a new package as part of kde-4.9.80+, and a new required dependency for kdepim-4.9.80+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 883501] Review Request: nepomuk-widgets - Nepomuk widgets collection
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883501 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 883501] Review Request: nepomuk-widgets - Nepomuk widgets collection
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883501 --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- rpmlint *.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4756431 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 883512] New: Review Request: libforensic1394 - A library for performing live memory forensics over firewire
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883512 Bug ID: 883512 Summary: Review Request: libforensic1394 - A library for performing live memory forensics over firewire Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libforensic1394.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libforensic1394-0.2-1.fc17.src.rpm Project URL: https://freddie.witherden.org/tools/libforensic1394/ Description: An library for performing live memory forensics over the IEEE 1394 (FireWire) interface. libforensic1394 improves upon existing libraries by providing a simple and clean interface to the the direct memory access functionality available over FireWire. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4756688 rpmlint output: libforensic1394.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) firewire - fire wire, fire-wire, firewater 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [fab@laptop11 x86_64]$ rpmlint libforensic1394* python-forensic1394* libforensic1394.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) firewire - fire wire, fire-wire, firewater 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 883512] Review Request: libforensic1394 - A library for performing live memory forensics over firewire
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883512 Fabian Affolter m...@fabian-affolter.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||563471 (FE-SECLAB) Alias||libforensic1394 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880763] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880763 --- Comment #5 from Sven Baus s.bau...@gmx.net --- Hey Antonio, have you been able to build? Me for myself have found out, that on my notebook (also working with fedora 17 kde) faced the problem above mentioned: AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.0-1.fc17.x86_64/usr/local/lib/audiocuesheeteditor cp: omitting directory `bin/Release' Seems like there is a problem with some systems and the makefile. I'm currently working on version 0.2.1. Have you some tips that should be made? Greetings Sven -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 883514] New: Review Request: inception - A fireWire physical memory manipulation tool
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883514 Bug ID: 883514 Summary: Review Request: inception - A fireWire physical memory manipulation tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/inception.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/inception-0.2.2-1.fc17.src.rpm Project URL: http://www.breaknenter.org/projects/inception/ Description: Inception is a FireWire physical memory manipulation and hacking tool exploiting IEEE 1394 SBP-2 DMA. The tool can unlock (any password accepted) and escalate privileges to Administrator/root on almost any machine you have physical access to. Inception aims to provide a stable and easy way of performing intrusive and non-intrusive memory hacks on live computers using FireWire SBP-2 DMA. It is primarily intended to do its magic against computers that utilize full disk encryption such as BitLocker, FileVault, TrueCrypt or Pointsec. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4756772 rpmlint output: [fab@laptop11 SRPMS]$ rpmlint inception-0.2.2-1.fc17.src.rpm inception.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) fireWire - fire Wire, fire-wire, firewater 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [fab@laptop11 noarch]$ rpmlint inception-0.2.2-1.fc17.noarch.rpm inception.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) fireWire - fire Wire, fire-wire, firewater inception.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary incept 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 883514] Review Request: inception - A fireWire physical memory manipulation tool
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883514 Fabian Affolter m...@fabian-affolter.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||563471 (FE-SECLAB), 883512 ||(libforensic1394) Alias||inception -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 883512] Review Request: libforensic1394 - A library for performing live memory forensics over firewire
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883512 Fabian Affolter m...@fabian-affolter.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||883514 (inception) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 883501] Review Request: nepomuk-widgets - Nepomuk widgets collection
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883501 Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org Alias||nepomuk-widgets -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 876403] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess - Guess C++ compiler and flags
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876403 --- Comment #3 from Miro Hrončok m...@hroncok.cz --- Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880763] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880763 --- Comment #6 from Antonio Trande trp...@katamail.com --- (In reply to comment #5) Hey Antonio, have you been able to build? This is a particular case for me; for this reason I'm waiting a comment from Christoph or someone else. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 876403] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess - Guess C++ compiler and flags
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876403 --- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok m...@hroncok.cz --- (In reply to comment #2) TODO: Replace variable PERL_INSTALL_ROOT obsoleted with DESTDIR name in %install. Excuse me, I don't underestadn this. Am I using a PERL_INSTALL_ROOT variable? I cannot see it. Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882090] Review Request: python-nose-progressive - Nose plugin to show a progress bar and tracebacks during tests
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882090
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
||m
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #3 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
Scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4756879
$ rpmlint -i -v *
python3-nose-progressive.noarch: I: checking
python3-nose-progressive.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) tracebacks -
trace backs, trace-backs, racetracks
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python3-nose-progressive.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
scrollback - scroll back, scroll-back, rollback
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python3-nose-progressive.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
centric - eccentric, concentric, centrist
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python3-nose-progressive.noarch: I: checking-url
https://github.com/erikrose/nose-progressive (timeout 10 seconds)
python-nose-progressive.src: I: checking
python-nose-progressive.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) tracebacks -
trace backs, trace-backs, racetracks
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python-nose-progressive.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scrollback
- scroll back, scroll-back, rollback
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python-nose-progressive.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US centric -
eccentric, concentric, centrist
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python-nose-progressive.src: I: checking-url
https://github.com/erikrose/nose-progressive (timeout 10 seconds)
python-nose-progressive.src:80: W: macro-in-comment %{__python}
There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros
are expanded everywhere, so check if it can cause a problem in this case and
escape the macro with another leading % if appropriate.
python-nose-progressive.src: I: checking-url
http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/n/nose-progressive/nose-progressive-1.3.tar.gz
(timeout 10 seconds)
python-nose-progressive.noarch: I: checking
python-nose-progressive.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) tracebacks -
trace backs, trace-backs, racetracks
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python-nose-progressive.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
scrollback - scroll back, scroll-back, rollback
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python-nose-progressive.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US centric
- eccentric, concentric, centrist
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
python-nose-progressive.noarch: I: checking-url
https://github.com/erikrose/nose-progressive (timeout 10 seconds)
python-nose-progressive.spec:80: W: macro-in-comment %{__python}
There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros
are expanded everywhere, so check if it can cause a problem in this case and
escape the macro with another leading % if appropriate.
python-nose-progressive.spec: I: checking-url
http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/n/nose-progressive/nose-progressive-1.3.tar.gz
(timeout 10 seconds)
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 11 warnings.
Some ignorable spelling errors. Just one issue: Please add an extra % to the
macro in %check to make rpmlint happy again. Then your package is ready for a
full review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880842] Review Request: pam_url - PAM module to authenticate with HTTP servers
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880842 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- pam_url-0.3.2-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pam_url-0.3.2-1.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880842] Review Request: pam_url - PAM module to authenticate with HTTP servers
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880842 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- pam_url-0.3.2-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pam_url-0.3.2-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880842] Review Request: pam_url - PAM module to authenticate with HTTP servers
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880842 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- pam_url-0.3.2-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pam_url-0.3.2-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 863569] Review Request: log4c - an application message logging library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863569 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- Looks good, thanks. APPROVED. I'll get you sponsored now, and you can move onto the scm request step of the process -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 866463] Review Request: php-phpunit-FinderFacade - Wrapper for Symfony's Finder component
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866463 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-phpunit-FinderFacade-1.0.5-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 842199] Review Request: php-Monolog - Logging for PHP 5.3
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842199 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-Monolog-1.2.1-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 876645] Review Request: python-fixtures - Fixtures, reusable state for writing clean tests and more
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876645 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-fixtures-0.3.9-4.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 866428] Review Request: php-theseer-fDOMDocument - An Extension to PHP standard DOM
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866428 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-theseer-fDOMDocument-1.3.2-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880964] Review Request: python-django-select2 - Select2 option fields for Django
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880964 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880964] Review Request: python-django-select2 - Select2 option fields for Django
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880964 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-django-select2-3.1.4-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 840109] Review Request: php-lessphp - A compiler for LESS written in PHP
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840109 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-lessphp-0.3.8-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 823352] Review Request: rubygem-chef - a client for the Chef config management system
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823352 --- Comment #10 from Matthew Miller mat...@redhat.com --- Cool. Yes, I'll take a look. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 863569] Review Request: log4c - an application message logging library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863569 František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz --- Package Change Request == Package Name: log4c New Branches: f18 Owners: valtri InitialCC: valtri The package resurrected in F18 and new review has been carried out here. The previous request was https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479835 . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 863569] Review Request: log4c - an application message logging library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863569 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847504] Review Request: rubygem-scoped_search - Easily search you ActiveRecord models
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847504 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- rubygem-scoped_search-2.4.0-5.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847504] Review Request: rubygem-scoped_search - Easily search you ActiveRecord models
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847504 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821285] Review Request: rubygem-bunny - A synchronous Ruby AMQP client
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821285 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- Package rubygem-bunny-0.7.9-2.fc18: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing rubygem-bunny-0.7.9-2.fc18' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-19645/rubygem-bunny-0.7.9-2.fc18 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821285] Review Request: rubygem-bunny - A synchronous Ruby AMQP client
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821285 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878556] Review Request: rubygem-simplecov - Code coverage analysis tool for Ruby 1.9
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878556 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878556] Review Request: rubygem-simplecov - Code coverage analysis tool for Ruby 1.9
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878556 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- rubygem-simplecov-0.7.1-5.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 881096] Review Request: openstack-packstack - OpenStack Install utility
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881096 Alan Pevec ape...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ape...@redhat.com --- Comment #10 from Alan Pevec ape...@redhat.com --- (In reply to comment #9) openstack-packstack-2012.2.1-1dev197.fc18 For pre-releases, release field should start with 0 e.g. 0.1.git197 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#PreReleasePackages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847160] Review Request: eclipse-m2e-core - Maven integration for Eclipse
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847160 Gerard Ryan ger...@ryan.lt changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(ger...@ryan.lt) --- Comment #8 from Gerard Ryan ger...@ryan.lt --- Oh yeah, this. I'll see if I can make any progress on it now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 879757] Review Request: ds-backup - for school server
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879757
jcqiu jc...@myseneca.ca changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jc...@myseneca.ca
--- Comment #2 from jcqiu jc...@myseneca.ca ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
[!]: Package installs properly.
Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
Note: %defattr present but not needed
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[?]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[?]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in %package
server, %package client
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
GPL, Unknown or generated. 2 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in /home/zyu26/rpmbuild/SRPMS/review-ds-
backup/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: No %config files under /usr.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
Note: Package contains no Conflicts: tag(s)
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[!]: Package installs properly.
Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: CheckResultdir
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[!]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
Note: Upstream MD5sum check error, diff is in /home/zyu26/rpmbuild/SRPMS
/review-ds-backup/diff.txt
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
Note: Documentation size is 61440 bytes in 6 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
[?]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[?]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
Note: Buildroot: present but
[Bug 863569] Review Request: log4c - an application message logging library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863569 František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ | Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz --- Package Change Request == Package Name: log4c New Branches: devel Can you give me access to the master branch too? It is orphaned now. (I'm not sure how to write it in the template.) Thank you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 838675] Review Request: python-beautifulsoup4 - HTML/XML parser for quick-turnaround applications like screen-scraping
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838675 --- Comment #21 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com --- Adding an epel branch. See bug 883537 where the Fedora maintainer is fine with me doing an epel branch. Package Change Request == Package Name: python-beautifulsoup4 New Branches: el6 Owners: kevin InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882090] Review Request: python-nose-progressive - Nose plugin to show a progress bar and tracebacks during tests
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882090 Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||882084 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882084] Review Request: python-blessings - Python library for terminal coloring, styling, and positioning
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882084 Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||882090 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 838675] Review Request: python-beautifulsoup4 - HTML/XML parser for quick-turnaround applications like screen-scraping
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838675 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ | Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #22 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com --- Adding an epel branch. See bug 883537 where the Fedora maintainer is fine with me doing an epel branch. Package Change Request == Package Name: python-beautifulsoup4 New Branches: el6 Owners: kevin InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 879757] Review Request: ds-backup - for school server
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879757 --- Comment #3 from jcqiu jc...@myseneca.ca --- rpmbuild --rebuild ds-backup-0.11.5.g536d1d6-3.fc17.src.rpm .. Requires(post): /bin/sh Requires: /bin/bash /usr/bin/python Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /home/jcqiu/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/ds-backup-0.11.5.g536d1d6-3.fc17.x86_64 warning: Could not canonicalize hostname: Fedora17 Wrote: /home/jcqiu/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/ds-backup-client-0.11.5.g536d1d6-3.fc17.noarch.rpm Wrote: /home/jcqiu/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/ds-backup-server-0.11.5.g536d1d6-3.fc17.noarch.rpm Executing(%clean): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ChcoYT + umask 022 + cd /home/jcqiu/rpmbuild/BUILD + cd ds-backup-0.11.5.g536d1d6 + rm -rf /home/jcqiu/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/ds-backup-0.11.5.g536d1d6-3.fc17.x86_64 + exit 0 Executing(--clean): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.SxRhM7 + umask 022 + cd /home/jcqiu/rpmbuild/BUILD + rm -rf ds-backup-0.11.5.g536d1d6 + exit 0 rpm -i ds-backup-0.11.5.g536d1d6-3.fc17.src.rpm warning: user zyu26 does not exist - using root warning: group zyu26 does not exist - using root warning: user zyu26 does not exist - using root warning: group zyu26 does not exist - using root │ ├── ds-backup-0.11.5.g536d1d6.tar.bz2 │ ├── ds-backup.spec rpmlint ds-backup.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. │ │ ├── ds-backup-client-0.11.5.g536d1d6-3.fc17.noarch.rpm │ │ └── ds-backup-server-0.11.5.g536d1d6-3.fc17.noarch.rpm rpmlint ds-backup* ds-backup-client.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ds-backup.py ds-backup-client.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ds-backup.sh ds-backup-server.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /var/www/ds-backup/backup-available.py ds-backup-server.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ds-postprocess.py ds-backup-server.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ds-cleanup.sh ds-backup-server.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ds-cleanup.py 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882090] Review Request: python-nose-progressive - Nose plugin to show a progress bar and tracebacks during tests
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882090 --- Comment #4 from Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com --- (In reply to comment #3) Some ignorable spelling errors. Just one issue: Please add an extra % to the macro in %check to make rpmlint happy again. Then your package is ready for a full review. Fixed: http://fedorapeople.org/~dcallagh/python-nose-progressive/python-nose-progressive.spec http://fedorapeople.org/~dcallagh/python-nose-progressive/python-nose-progressive-1.3-3.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 863569] Review Request: log4c - an application message logging library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863569 --- Comment #12 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- According to, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Deprecated_Package that doing devel too should fix things up. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 881794] Review Request: c-graph - a tool for visualizing the mathematical operation of convolution
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881794 Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: c-graph - |Review Request: c-graph - |C-Graph is an |a tool for visualizing the |abbreviation for|mathematical operation of |Convolution Graph |convolution -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878660] Review Request: openshift-origin-node-util - Utility scripts for the OpenShift Origin node
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878660 Troy Dawson tdaw...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #6 from Troy Dawson tdaw...@redhat.com --- Spec URL: http://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/openshift-origin/openshift-origin-node-util.spec SRPM URL: http://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/openshift-origin/openshift-origin-node-util-1.1.6-3.fc18.src.rpm I think we have everything. Dependancies: lsof - Added policycoreutils - Added system-config-firewall-base - Added quota - Added curl - not added (needed by rpm, should be installed by default) git - Added libcgroup-tools - Added File Permissions: Talked to upstream. They would like the files they previously marked as 0750 to remain that way. They want those files to only be ran as root and this is to discourage regular users from running them. True, they can just get the code and try it, but the 0750 settings will discourage someone from just doing a ruby blah and running the script. I have set the file permissions back to what Upstream had. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 881096] Review Request: openstack-packstack - OpenStack Install utility
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881096
--- Comment #11 from Derek Higgins der...@redhat.com ---
I'll fix this ASAP, since this is still in updates-testing will it be ok to
just change
-Release:1dev%{git_revno}%{?dist}
+Release:0.1dev%{git_revno}%{?dist}
If this isn't going to work, I'll do an upstream release and update packaging
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 879749] Review Request: xs-activation - OLPC XS Activation Server
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879749 Alex aadav...@learn.senecac.on.ca changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(m...@zarb.org) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 879752] Review Request: xs-tools - OLPC XS Tools
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879752 Alex aadav...@learn.senecac.on.ca changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(m...@zarb.org) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 879953] Review Request: xs-config - XS/XSX default configuration
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879953 Alex aadav...@learn.senecac.on.ca changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(m...@zarb.org) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 760357] Review Request: rubygem-systemu - Universal capture of stdout and stderr and handling of child process pid
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760357 Julian C. Dunn jd...@aquezada.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jd...@aquezada.com --- Comment #9 from Julian C. Dunn jd...@aquezada.com --- Jeffrey et. al.: This review is almost a year old with no import into Fedora/EPEL even though it's been approved. Can we import it? I need it to get bz#823344 working. I'm happy to take ownership if you don't want to maintain it now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 760357] Review Request: rubygem-systemu - Universal capture of stdout and stderr and handling of child process pid
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760357 --- Comment #10 from Jeffrey C. Ollie j...@ocjtech.us --- Julian, I have no interest in rubygem-systemu anymore. I've gone ahead and orphaned the package in pkgdb: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/rubygem-systemu It's all yours if you want it! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 879879] Review Request: moodle-xs - A Course Management System
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879879 --- Comment #14 from kparm...@myseneca.ca --- I have already met the requirements. I have FAS2 account and also have cert for koji. If you would like I would be happy to show the koji build of this package. Ok. I'll go through the review once again fix any error I find. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 879879] Review Request: moodle-xs - A Course Management System
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879879 --- Comment #15 from kparm...@myseneca.ca --- I have already met the requirements. I have FAS2 account and also have cert for koji. If you would like I would be happy to show the koji build of this package. Ok. I'll go through the review once again fix any error I find. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 827745] Review Request: junicode-fonts - Unicode font for medievalists
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827745 --- Comment #8 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com --- If no update will be provides in 2 weeks, I will close this ticket. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 879016] Review Request: phpMemcachedAdmin - Administration for memcached
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879016 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2012-12-05 01:51:00 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 879016] Review Request: phpMemcachedAdmin - Administration for memcached
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879016 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- phpMemcachedAdmin-1.2.2-5.svn262.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 879397] Review Request: php-Slim - PHP micro framework
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879397 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2012-12-05 01:54:07 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 879397] Review Request: php-Slim - PHP micro framework
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879397 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-Slim-2.1.0-5.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854386] Review Request: rubygem-openstack-quantum-client - Ruby openstack quantum Client
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854386 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2012-12-05 02:00:30 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854386] Review Request: rubygem-openstack-quantum-client - Ruby openstack quantum Client
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854386 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- rubygem-openstack-quantum-client-0.1.5-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 876403] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess - Guess C++ compiler and flags
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876403 --- Comment #5 from Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com --- It was my mistake, please ignore the comment about PERL_INSTALL_ROOT. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 879016] Review Request: phpMemcachedAdmin - Administration for memcached
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879016 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- phpMemcachedAdmin-1.2.2-5.svn262.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 879397] Review Request: php-Slim - PHP micro framework
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879397 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-Slim-2.1.0-5.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854386] Review Request: rubygem-openstack-quantum-client - Ruby openstack quantum Client
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854386 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- rubygem-openstack-quantum-client-0.1.5-3.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 876401] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS - Converts Perl XS code into C code
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876401 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jples...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jples...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 876401] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS - Converts Perl XS code into C code
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876401
--- Comment #3 from Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[!]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
Note: warning: File listed twice:
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/ExtUtils/xsubpp
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[-]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must
be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[ ]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Perl:
[!]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires and Requires:.
[x]: CPAN urls should be non-versioned.
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
--requires).
[-]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Uses parallel make.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
[x]: SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}.
Note: Source0 (ExtUtils-ParseXS-3.18.tar.gz)
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define.
= EXTRA items =
Generic:
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is
arched.
$ rpmlint ./perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS*
perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
typemaps - type maps, type-maps, typecast
perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US typemaps
- type maps, type-maps, typecast
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
