[Bug 889505] Review Request: libkqueue - A userspace implementation of the kqueue kernel event notification mechanism
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889505
--- Comment #9 from Eric Radman ---
Happy 2013! I think this package is starting to shape up
- devel and static subpackages depend on the base package
- Fix up the description a bit
- Install .so.* files with executable permissions
- Use %{_configure} for tests as well as the main program
Note the rpmlint complains that the subpackages don't include documentation,
but they include the base package which contains the man pages.
Comments are welcome
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=AfhtiSYhBr&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 782560] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-shadow - *nix Shadow Password Module
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782560 Michael Stahnke changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo? --- Comment #34 from Michael Stahnke --- Since this appears to be a stalled review, can I go ahead and do the review? It's a little weird since I submitted the original request, but since then Moses Mendoza has decided to take it over. It would also be his first package in Fedora, which is cool. Thoughts? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Eh7JSNO9i8&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 889011] Review Request: rubygem-asciidoctor - A pure Ruby implementation of AsciiDoc
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889011 --- Comment #3 from Dan Allen --- Vít, Thanks for taking the time to review my RPM spec! I'll incorporate your feedback and post again when it's ready for another round. Btw, regarding the source, I anticipated when I submitted that 0.0.8 would be tagged and released later that day, but alas it didn't happen. When I post again, I'll make sure the spec aligns with an official release :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=aeBmo1M6S3&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890830] Review Request: perl-Math-Factor-XS - Factorize numbers and calculate matching multiplications
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890830 Michael Scherer changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Michael Scherer --- Ok, good to go, approved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=a9iqzv3EKN&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 889476] Review Request: kio_mtp - An MTP KIO slave for KDE
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889476 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=utyNs2cLHF&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 889476] Review Request: kio_mtp - An MTP KIO slave for KDE
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889476 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- kio_mtp-0.70-2.20121225gitfae62fc.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=mDjVi0uqA2&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890438] Review Request: libkscreen - KDE Display Management library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890438 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NrGV2EaRky&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890438] Review Request: libkscreen - KDE Display Management library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890438 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- libkscreen-0.9.0-1.20121228git.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LpCxkn7xVT&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 877114] Review Request: smack - Open Source XMPP (Jabber) client library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877114 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=cXrW3kpzUH&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 877114] Review Request: smack - Open Source XMPP (Jabber) client library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877114 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- smack-3.2.2-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6Zc9Tyez4b&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890806] Review Request: perl-XML-SAX-ExpatXS - Perl SAX 2 XS extension to Expat parser
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890806 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- perl-XML-SAX-ExpatXS-1.33-4.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=jpITL6FN4N&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890806] Review Request: perl-XML-SAX-ExpatXS - Perl SAX 2 XS extension to Expat parser
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890806 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=JixQwym6pZ&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890799] Review Request: perl-Math-ConvexHull - Calculate convex hulls using Graham's scan (n*log(n))
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890799 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XjV6rJNNMJ&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890799] Review Request: perl-Math-ConvexHull - Calculate convex hulls using Graham's scan (n*log(n))
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890799 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Math-ConvexHull-1.04-3.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CaTwYd9e2D&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 888958] Review Request: gtk-solidity-engine - Solidity Gtk+ theming engine
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888958 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- gtk-solidity-engine-0.4.1-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=TDnJ8dFv0b&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 888958] Review Request: gtk-solidity-engine - Solidity Gtk+ theming engine
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888958 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hg6wV89UY3&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890803] Review Request: perl-Math-ConvexHull-MonotoneChain - Monotone chain algorithm for finding a convex hull in 2D
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890803 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Math-ConvexHull-MonotoneChain-0.01-3.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=n99f9G0Lyt&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890803] Review Request: perl-Math-ConvexHull-MonotoneChain - Monotone chain algorithm for finding a convex hull in 2D
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890803 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=U3UNY2ulHi&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 875893] Review Request: python-cloud-sptheme - A nice sphinx theme named 'Cloud', and some related extensions
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875893 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- python-cloud-sptheme-1.5-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=I384rqHJxf&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890417] Review Request: php-Analog - PHP micro logging package
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890417 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- php-Analog-1.0.0-2.git876d8a3bb.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=lp0EMHilRj&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890417] Review Request: php-Analog - PHP micro logging package
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890417 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=aLYF5SAYD3&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 889505] Review Request: libkqueue - A userspace implementation of the kqueue kernel event notification mechanism
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889505 --- Comment #8 from Michael Schwendt --- * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Compiler_flags * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Devel_Packages * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25clean "Happy New Year!" since this is probably my last bugzilla comment in 2012. ;-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=VQr9ORBTjE&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 836368] Review Request: rubygem-bicho - Library to access Bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836368
--- Comment #11 from Darryl L. Pierce ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> For 0.0.6-2:
>
> ! bug dependency
> - As this bug depends on 836368, I cannot approve this bug
> until bug 836368 is updated.
>
> * About C extension related things
> - This package is noarch, no C code is included, so
> C extension related things are not needed.
> (e.g. export CONFIGURE_ARGS= writing this on noarch
> srpm is confusing)
Removed.
> * Unneeded files
> -
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby?rd=Packaging/
> Ruby#Running_test_suites
> - Current packaging guidelines requests NOT to
> ship files under test/
>
> - Also, "Rakefile" is something like "Makefile", which
> we do not ship in binary rpms.
>
> - %{gem_instdir}/bicho.gemspec is usually also not needed.
I've excluded these files from the package.
>
> * Executing test
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby?rd=Packaging/
> Ruby#Running_test_suites
> - As this gem contains test/ directory, please execute
> some test suite on %check if possible. If not possible,
> please write some comments on the spec file
> (e.g. test suite needs network access or so)
To run the tests requires BRs for rubygem-nokogiri and rubygem-inifile. This
works locally, but won't be buildable via Koji until the git repo is made for
rubygem-inifile.
Updated SPEC: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-bicho.spec
updated SRPM:
http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-bicho-0.0.6-2.1.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=oAjeOwn3n0&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890830] Review Request: perl-Math-Factor-XS - Factorize numbers and calculate matching multiplications
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890830
--- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok ---
Haha you got me. It was there, because the Build script explicitly required
Module::Build >= 0.40 and back in September, there was version 0.38 in Fedora
17. I tryed to overwrite it in Build and it worked, so i "hacked" it that way.
Forgot to remov when it reached updates.
Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/hroncok/SPECS/master/perl-Math-Factor-XS.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/downloads/hroncok/SPECS/perl-Math-Factor-XS-0.40-5.fc17.src.rpm
- Do not delete %%{buildroot} in %%install
- Removed "dirty hack" (overwriting Module::Build min version in Build script)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=EZDED3uHJW&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858058] Review Request: mingw-qt5-qtbase - Qt5 for Windows - QtBase component
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858058 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||891011 --- Comment #3 from Erik van Pienbroek --- Updated Spec URL: http://svn.openftd.org/svn/fedora_cross/mingw-qt5-qtbase/mingw-qt5-qtbase.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://koji.vanpienbroek.nl/kojifiles/packages/mingw-qt5-qtbase/5.0.0/3.fc18/src/mingw-qt5-qtbase-5.0.0-3.fc18.src.rpm == Earlier builds of this package contained a bundled copy of the ANGLE library. As specified by the packaging guidelines it is forbidden to use bundled copies of external libraries. Therefore a separate mingw-angleproject package was created: bug 891011 == * Sat Dec 29 2012 Erik van Pienbroek - 5.0.0-3 - The define QT_NEEDS_QMAIN also needs to be set for our mkspecs profiles - To make linking against qt5main.a (which contains a Qt specific WinMain) work binaries need to be linked with -lmingw32 -lqt5main - Resolves some initialisation issues - Don't enable ICU support as it introduces over 20MB of dependency bloat * Sat Dec 29 2012 Erik van Pienbroek - 5.0.0-2 - Don't segfault when no suitable platform dll could be located * Mon Dec 24 2012 Erik van Pienbroek - 5.0.0-1 - Update to Qt 5.0.0 Final - Use the qplatformdefs.h header which is included in the win32-g++ mkspecs profile instead of providing our own - Replaced the bundled copy of the ANGLE libraries with a seperate mingw-angleproject package * Thu Dec 13 2012 Erik van Pienbroek - 5.0.0-0.15.rc2 - Update to Qt 5.0.0 RC2 - Dropped upstreamed DirectWrite patch * Fri Dec 7 2012 Erik van Pienbroek - 5.0.0-0.14.rc1 - Update to Qt 5.0.0 RC1 - Replaced various hack with proper patches - Use the configure argument -archdatadir as it is used to decide where the mkspecs profiles should be installed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=UYmdsZbMpr&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 891011] Review Request: mingw-angleproject - Almost Native Graphics Layer Engine
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891011 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||858058 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qrP4vbgvUb&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874249] Review Request: rubygem-inifile - INI file reader and writer
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874249 Darryl L. Pierce changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Darryl L. Pierce --- Thank you. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: rubygem-inifile Short Description: INI file reader and writer Owners: mcpierce Branches: f16 f17 f18 InitialCC: mcpierce -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=iFY9nB2uIj&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 891011] New: Review Request: mingw-angleproject - Almost Native Graphics Layer Engine
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891011 Bug ID: 891011 Summary: Review Request: mingw-angleproject - Almost Native Graphics Layer Engine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl Spec URL: http://svn.openftd.org/svn/fedora_cross/mingw-angleproject/mingw-angleproject.spec SRPM URL: http://koji.vanpienbroek.nl/kojifiles/packages/mingw-angleproject/0/2.svn1561.20121214.fc18/src/mingw-angleproject-0-2.svn1561.20121214.fc18.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: epienbro Description: ANGLE is a conformant implementation of the OpenGL ES 2.0 specification that is hardware‐accelerated via Direct3D. ANGLE v1.0.772 was certified compliant by passing the ES 2.0.3 conformance tests in October 2011. ANGLE also provides an implementation of the EGL 1.4 specification. ANGLE is used as the default WebGL backend for both Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox on Windows platforms. Chrome uses ANGLE for all graphics rendering on Windows, including the accelerated Canvas2D implementation and the Native Client sandbox environment. Portions of the ANGLE shader compiler are used as a shader validator and translator by WebGL implementations across multiple platforms. It is used on Mac OS X, Linux, and in mobile variants of the browsers. Having one shader validator helps to ensure that a consistent set of GLSL ES shaders are accepted across browsers and platforms. The shader translator can be used to translate shaders to other shading languages, and to optionally apply shader modifications to work around bugs or quirks in the native graphics drivers. The translator targets Desktop GLSL, Direct3D HLSL, and even ESSL for native GLES2 platforms. == This package is required by mingw-qt5-qtbase (bug 858058) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qjbq0JlDOF&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 881903] Review Request: python-zope-interface4 - Forward compat package for Zope 3 Interface Infrastructure
Product: Fedora EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881903 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- python-zope-interface4-4.0.2-7.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-zope-interface4-4.0.2-7.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=o4TTMUmzFF&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890859] Review Request: scopy - Application to play to Italian card game Scopa
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890859 --- Comment #10 from Antonio Trande --- Added line for removing Multiplayer.py file. Grouped desktop-file-edit tasks. Changelog updated. Spec URL: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/scopy.spec SRPM URL: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/scopy-0.4.2-3.fc18.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=jjH5F0KKEE&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 888224] Review Request: libshairport - emulates an airport express
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888224 --- Comment #15 from Lorenzo Dalrio --- Thank you Tom, thank you Ken. Opened bug 2631 [1] on rpm fusion bugzilla. [1] https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2631 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ZOdh7vMmXc&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 877114] Review Request: smack - Open Source XMPP (Jabber) client library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877114 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- smack-3.2.2-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/smack-3.2.2-2.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=JKlBt7DInP&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 877114] Review Request: smack - Open Source XMPP (Jabber) client library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877114 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- smack-3.2.2-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/smack-3.2.2-2.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NhnkdYFC6V&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 877114] Review Request: smack - Open Source XMPP (Jabber) client library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877114 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5meG1UhJLk&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890830] Review Request: perl-Math-Factor-XS - Factorize numbers and calculate matching multiplications
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890830
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@zarb.org
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@zarb.org
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Michael Scherer ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= Issues =
- rm -rf %{buildroot} is not needed in %install
- why is there a need for a "dirty hack" on f17 ( ie, what is the issue with
Build )
- License missing
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[!]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"Unknown or generated". 1 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/misc/checkout/git/FedoraReview/890830-perl-Math-
Factor-XS/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[-]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must
be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
Note: Package contains no Conflicts: tag(s)
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
Perl:
[x]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires and Requires:.
[x]: CPAN urls should be non-versioned.
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate fr
[Bug 888224] Review Request: libshairport - emulates an airport express
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888224 --- Comment #14 from Ken Dreyer --- Thank you spot for the prompt analysis. It looks like either option will require coding and work upstream. Since this library is mainly designed to support xbmc, let's move it to RPM Fusion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=RxWUsoV44p&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890909] Review Request: efreet - Standards handling for freedesktop.org standards
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890909
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@zarb.org
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@zarb.org
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Michael Scherer ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package was already in Fedora, please keep in mind for the git request
- Various rpmlint warning about unused-direct-shlib-dependency
- Dependency should be fully versionned and there is no
No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in efreet-devel
( ie, isa is missing )
- there is a direcoty with tests, and they are not enable ( src/tests ),
they should be enabled.
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in efreet-
devel
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"GPL (v2 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 2 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/misc/checkout/git/FedoraReview/890909-efreet/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
Note: Package contains no Conflicts: tag(s)
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the sour
[Bug 890859] Review Request: scopy - Application to play to Italian card game Scopa
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890859 --- Comment #9 from Antonio Trande --- (In reply to comment #7) > That refers to: > > > http://docs.python.org/release/2.7.3/reference/lexical_analysis. > html#indentation > > If the indentation used in file Multiplayer.py is incorrect, bytecompiling > it manually won't work either. You would need to repair the indentation for > the code to work. > > It seems to me the file Multiplayer.py is unfinished and not used yet. > Deleting it and reporting this error to the developers would be a > work-around. Unless you know where/how the file is used and how to activate > the multiplayer/online gaming mode. Ok. I have been poorly careful and I have done an useless work. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=dPRVCwDDqh&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890859] Review Request: scopy - Application to play to Italian card game Scopa
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890859
--- Comment #8 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > Only a few questions raised by the spec file, since I'm short on time:
> >
> >
> > > # Turn off the brp-python-bytecompile script
> >
> > _Why_ is it turnt off?
> >
> >
> > > %global __python %{__python3}
> >
> > > BuildRequires: python2-devel
> > > BuildRequires: python3-devel
> >
> > Both?
> >
> > $ rpm --query --Requires scopy|grep py
> > /usr/bin/python
> >
> > That would be Python 2.
> > On the contrary:
> >
> > $ cat /usr/bin/scopy
> > #!/bin/bash
> > cd /usr/share/scopy/src
> > env python scopy.py
> >
> > That would be like "#! /usr/bin/env python", which is discouraged. Have
> > found only this:
> >
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Script_Interpreters_%28draft%29
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python
> >
> >
> > > # Manually invoke the python byte compile macro for file that needs byte
> > > # compilation.
> >
> > Why?
> >
> > > %py_byte_compile %{__python3}
> > > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/src/Actions/Multiplayer.py
> >
> > That gives an error in the build.log. The path is wrong. %name is missing.
Right. I have fixed it and probably (after to have read again the error)
Bytecompiling is not involved.
"IdentationError" is a write error. Or am I wrong again ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=sjHWDgYSN0&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890859] Review Request: scopy - Application to play to Italian card game Scopa
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890859 --- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt --- That refers to: http://docs.python.org/release/2.7.3/reference/lexical_analysis.html#indentation If the indentation used in file Multiplayer.py is incorrect, bytecompiling it manually won't work either. You would need to repair the indentation for the code to work. It seems to me the file Multiplayer.py is unfinished and not used yet. Deleting it and reporting this error to the developers would be a work-around. Unless you know where/how the file is used and how to activate the multiplayer/online gaming mode. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CLAA9ibk6H&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 888224] Review Request: libshairport - emulates an airport express
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888224 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com --- Comment #13 from Tom "spot" Callaway --- David Hammerton's ALAC decoder is not okay for Fedora, because of legal concerns. The code at http://alac.macosforge.org is however under a Patent grant from Apple via the Apache License, so it would be acceptable. (That grant does not apply to the Hammerton implementation.) The Apple ALAC code compiles into a static library with their Makefile, but it is almost certainly possible to make it into a shared library with a few minor Makefile changes. Then, libshairport could be patched to use it. Alternately, you could delete the ALAC code from libshairport, though I'm not sure if that will render it useless or not. Sorry to be a buzzkill. Leaving this FE-Legal blocked for now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4BpnL04u5x&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 884291] Review Request: gvrng - LOGO styled programming tutor for kids
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884291 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- gvrng-4.4-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gvrng-4.4-3.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=oNdfapiLKV&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 872910] Review Request: rubygem-test-unit-notify - Test::Unit::Notify - A test result notify extension for Test::Unit
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872910 Mamoru TASAKA changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Mamoru TASAKA --- Thank you! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: rubygem-test-unit-notify Short Description: Test::Unit::Notify - A test result notify extension for Test::Unit Owners: mtasaka Branches: f17 f18 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=G89zEwlGzT&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890859] Review Request: scopy - Application to play to Italian card game Scopa
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890859
--- Comment #6 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Only a few questions raised by the spec file, since I'm short on time:
>
>
> > # Turn off the brp-python-bytecompile script
>
> _Why_ is it turnt off?
>
>
> > %global __python %{__python3}
>
> > BuildRequires: python2-devel
> > BuildRequires: python3-devel
>
> Both?
>
> $ rpm --query --Requires scopy|grep py
> /usr/bin/python
>
> That would be Python 2.
> On the contrary:
>
> $ cat /usr/bin/scopy
> #!/bin/bash
> cd /usr/share/scopy/src
> env python scopy.py
>
> That would be like "#! /usr/bin/env python", which is discouraged. Have
> found only this:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Script_Interpreters_%28draft%29
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python
>
>
> > # Manually invoke the python byte compile macro for file that needs byte
> > # compilation.
>
> Why?
>
> > %py_byte_compile %{__python3}
> > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/src/Actions/Multiplayer.py
>
> That gives an error in the build.log. The path is wrong. %name is missing.
Hi Michael.
Probably I have badly comprehended
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Bytecompiling_with_the_correct_python_version
or the error appears.
This is the error that leads me to do use python byte compile macro:
+ /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile /usr/bin/python 1
Bytecompiling .py files below
/home/sagitter/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/scopy-0.4.2-2.fc18.x86_64/usr/lib/python2.7/
using /usr/bin/python2.7
Compiling
/home/sagitter/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/scopy-0.4.2-2.fc18.x86_64/usr/share/scopy/src/Actions/Multiplayer.py
...
Sorry: IndentationError: ('unindent does not match any outer indentation
level', ('/usr/share/scopy/src/Actions/Multiplayer.py', 90, 27, '\tdef
crea_win_multi(self):\n'))
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=oiBFehB3q5&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 836368] Review Request: rubygem-bicho - Library to access Bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836368 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru TASAKA --- As bug 874249 is already approved (by me), please update this one. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gfPKA1BTC1&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890859] Review Request: scopy - Application to play to Italian card game Scopa
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890859
--- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt ---
Only a few questions raised by the spec file, since I'm short on time:
> # Turn off the brp-python-bytecompile script
_Why_ is it turnt off?
> %global __python %{__python3}
> BuildRequires: python2-devel
> BuildRequires: python3-devel
Both?
$ rpm --query --Requires scopy|grep py
/usr/bin/python
That would be Python 2.
On the contrary:
$ cat /usr/bin/scopy
#!/bin/bash
cd /usr/share/scopy/src
env python scopy.py
That would be like "#! /usr/bin/env python", which is discouraged. Have found
only this:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Script_Interpreters_%28draft%29
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python
> # Manually invoke the python byte compile macro for file that needs byte
> # compilation.
Why?
> %py_byte_compile %{__python3}
> $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/src/Actions/Multiplayer.py
That gives an error in the build.log. The path is wrong. %name is missing.
> desktop-file-edit\
> --remove-category=Game \
> ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop
>
> desktop-file-edit\
> --add-category="Game;" \
> ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop
desktop-file-edit fixes a missing ';' automatically when you use it to edit a
.desktop file. It warns about that. And if you remove/add the category
explicitly, it would also append/insert a needed ';' automatically.
It's possible to execute it once with multiple edit options.
> Requires: gtk3
Probably, but there are gtk2 files included, too. No idea yet how that all fits
together. Similarly confusing (albeit entirely harmless):
$ rpmls scopy|grep build
drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/scopy/build
drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/scopy/build/scripts-3.3
-rwxr-xr-x /usr/share/scopy/build/scripts-3.3/scopy
$ cat /usr/share/scopy/build/scripts-3.3/scopy
#!/bin/bash
cd /usr/share/scopy/src
env python scopy.py
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NrllTJNzb3&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 884291] Review Request: gvrng - LOGO styled programming tutor for kids
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884291 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- gvrng-4.4-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gvrng-4.4-3.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FoZbV5Tqoz&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 884291] Review Request: gvrng - LOGO styled programming tutor for kids
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884291 Neil Horman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=BLPTrbKKLJ&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 770534] Review Request: rubygem-imagesize - Measure image size(GIF, PNG, JPEG ,,, etc)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770534
--- Comment #7 from Darryl L. Pierce ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- gems should require rubygems package
Note: Requires: rubygems missing in rubygem-imagesize-doc
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby#RubyGems
- License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses found.
Please check the source files for licenses manually.
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#ValidLicenseShortNames
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[-]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must
be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
Note: Package contains no Conflicts: tag(s)
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
Ruby:
[x]: Platform dependent files must all go under %{gem_extdir}, platform
independent under %{gem_dir}.
[x]: Gem package must not define a non-gem subpackage
[x]: Gem package is named rubygem-%{gem_name}
[x]: Package contains BuildRequires: rubygems-devel.
[x]: Gem package must define %{gem_name} macro.
[x]: Pure Ruby package must be built as noarch
[x]: Package contains Requires: ruby(abi).
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Package functions as described.
[!]: Latest version is packaged.
The latest version 1.1.1. I don't see a version 0.1.1 listed as a release
artifact here:
https://rubygems.org/gems/image_size
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check i
[Bug 872910] Review Request: rubygem-test-unit-notify - Test::Unit::Notify - A test result notify extension for Test::Unit
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872910
Darryl L. Pierce changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Darryl L. Pierce ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- gems should require rubygems package
Note: Requires: rubygems missing in rubygem-test-unit-notify-doc
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby#RubyGems
- License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses found.
Please check the source files for licenses manually.
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#ValidLicenseShortNames
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must
be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
Note: Package contains no Conflicts: tag(s)
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
Ruby:
[-]: Platform dependent files must all go under %{gem_extdir}, platform
independent under %{gem_dir}.
[x]: Gem package must not define a non-gem subpackage
[x]: Gem package is named rubygem-%{gem_name}
[x]: Package contains BuildRequires: rubygems-devel.
[x]: Gem package must define %{gem_name} macro.
[x]: Pure Ruby package must be built as noarch
[x]: Package contains Requires: ruby(abi).
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compil
[Bug 889476] Review Request: kio_mtp - An MTP KIO slave for KDE
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889476 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- kio_mtp-0.70-2.20121225gitfae62fc.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kio_mtp-0.70-2.20121225gitfae62fc.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5G3O7k4WdW&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 889476] Review Request: kio_mtp - An MTP KIO slave for KDE
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889476 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- kio_mtp-0.70-2.20121225gitfae62fc.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kio_mtp-0.70-2.20121225gitfae62fc.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=APP81BpD4x&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 889476] Review Request: kio_mtp - An MTP KIO slave for KDE
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889476 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=mZoYHllwO3&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880763] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880763 --- Comment #12 from Sven Baus --- Hello everybody, I have finished work for version 0.2.1, so the next review request will come in some days. I have also found out, that it is better to use xbuild building the source, since the makefile just sometimes works and sometimes not (I don't understand why). So thanks for your help, we will meet in the next year ;). Greetings Sven -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=iCDbiHoWr1&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890859] Review Request: scopy - Application to play to Italian card game Scopa
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890859 --- Comment #4 from Antonio Trande --- Release tag was wrong. Corrected. Spec URL: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/scopy.spec SRPM URL: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/scopy-0.4.2-2.fc18.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6yTttpT7Ri&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890872] Review Request: OpenTK - C# library that wraps OpenGL, OpenCL and OpenAL
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890872 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||890946 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1J1CSR86T5&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890946] Review Request: RepetierHost - 3D printer control software
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890946 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||890872 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FACJA0d5io&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890946] New: Review Request: RepetierHost - 3D printer control software
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890946 Bug ID: 890946 Summary: Review Request: RepetierHost - 3D printer control software Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: m...@hroncok.cz Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/hroncok/SPECS/master/RepetierHost.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/downloads/hroncok/SPECS/RepetierHost-0.82b-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Software for controlling RepRap style 3D-printer like Mendel, Darwin or Prusa Mendel. Works with most firmware types. It is optimized to work with Repetier-Firmware Other working firmware is Sprinter, Teacup, Marlin and all compatible firmwares. Fedora Account System Username: churchyard -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=WfgrVKhTGV&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890872] Review Request: OpenTK - C# library that wraps OpenGL, OpenCL and OpenAL
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890872 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: opentk - C# |Review Request: OpenTK - C# |library that wraps OpenGL, |library that wraps OpenGL, |OpenCL and OpenAL |OpenCL and OpenAL --- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok --- Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/hroncok/SPECS/master/OpenTK.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/downloads/hroncok/SPECS/OpenTK-0.0-3.20120523svn3125.fc17.src.rpm Renamed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gntfcBpgUs&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 851768] Review Request: mod_rpaf - Changes the remote IP in Apache to use client IP and not proxy IP
Product: Fedora EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851768 Ville Skyttä changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bMETnysZN4&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890872] Review Request: opentk - C# library that wraps OpenGL, OpenCL and OpenAL
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890872 --- Comment #1 from Miro Hrončok --- Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/hroncok/SPECS/master/opentk.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/downloads/hroncok/SPECS/opentk-0.0-2.20120523svn3125.fc17.src.rpm - The package now owns /usr/lib/mono/opentk directory -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hDq3J8BSkI&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890831] Review Request: perl-Math-Prime-XS - Detect and calculate prime numbers with deterministic tests
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890831 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Miro Hrončok --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Math-Prime-XS Short Description: Detect and calculate prime numbers with deterministic tests Owners: churchyard Branches: f17 f18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Dd5wDnaUuY&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890831] Review Request: perl-Math-Prime-XS - Detect and calculate prime numbers with deterministic tests
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890831 --- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok --- About xt, it shouldn't probably be there. Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/hroncok/SPECS/master/perl-Math-Prime-XS.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/downloads/hroncok/SPECS/perl-Math-Prime-XS-0.26-6.fc17.src.rpm - Removed xt from doc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MRTAzW6Yl9&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890806] Review Request: perl-XML-SAX-ExpatXS - Perl SAX 2 XS extension to Expat parser
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890806 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- perl-XML-SAX-ExpatXS-1.33-4.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-XML-SAX-ExpatXS-1.33-4.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hHKdfDQZWj&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890806] Review Request: perl-XML-SAX-ExpatXS - Perl SAX 2 XS extension to Expat parser
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890806 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- perl-XML-SAX-ExpatXS-1.33-4.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-XML-SAX-ExpatXS-1.33-4.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bwfkxr7elS&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 848043] Review Request: sshguard - Protect hosts from brute force attacks against ssh
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848043 Sebastien Caps changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2012-12-31 04:23:24 --- Comment #14 from Sebastien Caps --- Since I still lack of sponsor and I have no more time to spend on it, I close it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vqPmA2b4AD&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828188] Review Request: reprepro - Debian package repository producer
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828188 Sebastien Caps changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2012-12-31 04:22:48 --- Comment #16 from Sebastien Caps --- Since I still lack of sponsor and I have no more time to spend on it, I close it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MHpuBhdz0n&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 851768] Review Request: mod_rpaf - Changes the remote IP in Apache to use client IP and not proxy IP
Product: Fedora EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851768 Sebastien Caps changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2012-12-31 04:22:21 --- Comment #4 from Sebastien Caps --- Since I still lack of sponsor and I have no more time to spend on it, I close it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=SkkUOB0VSJ&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 851768] Review Request: mod_rpaf - Changes the remote IP in Apache to use client IP and not proxy IP
Product: Fedora EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851768 --- Comment #3 from Sebastien Caps --- It is not affected since this version does not use debian custom patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zh1erBAhxy&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 863793] Review Request: skeinforge - Converts 3D model into G-Code for RepRap
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863793
--- Comment #9 from Miro Hrončok ---
Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/hroncok/SPECS/master/skeinforge.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/downloads/hroncok/SPECS/skeinforge-12.03.14-10.fc17.src.rpm
- Changed location of skeinforge from %{_datadir}/%{name}/
to %{python_sitelib}/%{name}
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=swyholrBF3&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 863796] Review Request: printrun - RepRap printer interface and tools
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863796
--- Comment #9 from Miro Hrončok ---
Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/hroncok/SPECS/master/printrun.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/downloads/hroncok/SPECS/printrun-0.0-14.20121103git6fa47668f2.fc17.src.rpm
- Changed location of skeinforge from %{_datadir}/%{name}/
to %{python_sitelib}/%{name}
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=C7vCD0y4Hi&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890806] Review Request: perl-XML-SAX-ExpatXS - Perl SAX 2 XS extension to Expat parser
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890806 --- Comment #9 from Miro Hrončok --- Thanks, I revoked the updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=OtP5rpEaGA&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 855588] Review Request: ghc-concrete-typerep - Provides Binary and Hashable instances for TypeRep.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855588 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-concrete-typerep-0.1.0.1-4.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-concrete-typerep-0.1.0.1-4.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=rWGMoKo7HA&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 785480] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Log - Horde Logging library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785480 Remi Collet changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||890927 ||(Horde-SessionHandler) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HSyqHH5o2E&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 785472] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Db - Horde Database Libraries
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785472 Remi Collet changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||890927 ||(Horde-SessionHandler) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=BmLagxSIRB&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890927] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-SessionHandler - Horde Session Handler API
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890927 Remi Collet changed: What|Removed |Added CC||n...@fedoraproject.org Depends On||785472 (horde-db), 785480 ||(horde-log) Alias||Horde-SessionHandler -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qzmYu8rEOM&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890927] New: Review Request: php-horde-Horde-SessionHandler - Horde Session Handler API
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890927 Bug ID: 890927 Summary: Review Request: php-horde-Horde-SessionHandler - Horde Session Handler API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: fed...@famillecollet.com Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/remicollet/remirepo/master/php/horde/php-horde-Horde-SessionHandler/php-horde-Horde-SessionHandler.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/php-horde-Horde-SessionHandler-2.0.1-1.remi.src.rpm Description: Horde_SessionHandler defines an API for implementing custom session handlers for PHP. Fedora Account System Username: remi -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HM2UmqT0WP&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
