[Bug 904707] New: Review Request: rubygem-ruby-ntlm - NTLM implementation for Ruby
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904707 Bug ID: 904707 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ruby-ntlm - NTLM implementation for Ruby Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: mtas...@fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/mechanize-related/rubygem-ruby-ntlm.spec SRPM URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/mechanize-related/rubygem-ruby-ntlm-0.0.1-1.fc.src.rpm Description: NTLM implementation for Ruby. Fedora Account System Username: mtasaka Koji scratch build: F-19: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4905450 F-18: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4905452 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FHQynIZO8F&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 904640] Review Request: rubygem-domain_name - Domain Name manipulation library for Ruby
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904640 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru TASAKA --- http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/mechanize-related/rubygem-domain_name.spec http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/mechanize-related/rubygem-domain_name-0.5.7-2.fc.src.rpm * Sun Jan 27 2013 Mamoru TASAKA - 0.5.7-2 - A bit clean up -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=cPGJakf09b&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 901365] Review Request: python-mongoengine - MongoEngine is an ORM-like layer on top of PyMongo
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901365 --- Comment #3 from Eduardo Echeverria --- Hi Yohan, the installation of python-mongoengine fails, Why? Your "Requires" apparently are incorrect Note that : Requires: pymongo => 2.11 not currently available in fedora. Let's review if you run the command yum --noplugins provides pymongo We have the output pymongo-2.1.1-2.fc18.x86_64 : Python driver for MongoDB Repo: fedora python-pymongo-2.3-5.fc18.x86_64 : Python driver for MongoDB Repo: fedora Matched from: Provides: pymongo = 2.3-5.fc18 python-pymongo-2.3-5.fc18.x86_64 : Python driver for MongoDB Repo: @fedora Matched from: Provides: pymongo = 2.3-5.fc18 The version available is 2.1.1, and since in its spec is greater than 2.11 (What makes me think this is a typo), the correct BR should be python-pymongo You should also take a look at this bug [1] - Become familiar with the code of your package, check import statements, this will help you know what are the dependencies for the package - It's good idea make a scratch build on koji before submitting any package to bugzilla and put the link in the review, this makes it easier to review for a willing sponsor [2] - Btw, don't install the documentation available in your package directly, should generate. use python-sphinx as BR for it - Although you present the test as a link in the review, I see no section %check in the spec, please run the available tests - Please bump the release number every time you make a change in the spec [3] [1] bug 880372 [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_the_Koji_build_system#Scratch_Builds [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Changelogs Kind Regards -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XqYReG2XAi&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 851683] Review Request: mingw-gconf2 - MinGW Windows port of the GNOME 2.x Desktop Configuration Database System
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851683
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek ---
Taking for review
The %global mingw_build_winXX lines can be removed as they're already enabled
by default in mingw-filesystem
The config.cache files which you use in the src.rpm shouldn't be necessary on
Fedora. If building the libraries for the win64 target fails then it is
probably caused by an outdated bundled libtool. In that case a BuildRequires:
autoconf automake libtool and a 'autoreconf --install --force' in the %prep
section should do the trick
Is overriding the PATH before the %mingw_configure call still necessary?
Is the export ORBIT_IDL really necessary? The orbit2 package isn't mentioned as
a BuildRequires
In the %mingw_configure call you used '--with-gtk=3.0' while there's only a
BuildRequires: mingw32-gtk2 mingw64-gtk2 mentioned earlier in the .spec file.
Shouldn't the BuildRequires point to gtk3?
The %files section contains several unowned-folders, for example
%{mingw32_includedir}/gconf, %{mingw32_includedir}/gconf/2,
%{mingw32_libdir}/GConf, %{mingw32_libdir}/GConf/2 and
%{mingw32_datadir}/sgml/gconf. You can use the RPM directive %dir to have these
folders owned by this package
The folders %{mingw32_datadir}/dbus-1, %{mingw32_datadir}/dbus-1/services,
%{mingw64_datadir}/dbus-1 and %{mingw64_datadir}/dbus-1/services should be
owned by the mingw-dbus package, but that isn't the case yet. A bug report
should be filed for the mingw-dbus package so that the package maintainer of
mingw-dbus can add those directory ownerships
The man-pages should be removed from this package as they duplicate the native
dbus man pages. The sgml file also looks like a potential candidate to remove.
The autostart files can be removed as well as this feature doesn't work on
win32/win64 environments
The folders %{mingw32_datadir}/locale and %{mingw64_datadir}/locale should NOT
be owned by this package. Please use the %mingw_find_lang macro instead (see
the packaging guidelines for an example how to use this)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=KahcNbZ0m0&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 851677] Review Request: mingw-dbus-glib - MinGW build of GLib bindings for D-Bus
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851677
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from Erik van Pienbroek ---
$ rpmlint mingw-dbus-glib.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint mingw-dbus-glib-0.100-4.fc18.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint mingw32-dbus-glib-0.100-4.fc18.noarch.rpm
mingw32-dbus-glib-static-0.100-4.fc18.noarch.rpm
mingw64-dbus-glib-0.100-4.fc18.noarch.rpm
mingw64-dbus-glib-static-0.100-4.fc18.noarch.rpm
mingw32-dbus-glib-static.noarch: W: no-documentation
mingw64-dbus-glib-static.noarch: W: no-documentation
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
$ rpm --query --requires mingw32-dbus-glib
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
mingw32-crt
mingw32-filesystem >= 83
mingw32(kernel32.dll)
mingw32(libdbus-1-3.dll)
mingw32(libdbus-glib-1-2.dll)
mingw32(libexpat-1.dll)
mingw32(libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll)
mingw32(libgio-2.0-0.dll)
mingw32(libglib-2.0-0.dll)
mingw32(libgobject-2.0-0.dll)
mingw32(msvcrt.dll)
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
$ rpm --query --requires mingw32-dbus-glib-static
mingw32-dbus-glib = 0.100-4.fc18
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
$ rpm --query --requires mingw64-dbus-glib
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
mingw64-crt
mingw64-filesystem >= 83
mingw64(kernel32.dll)
mingw64(libdbus-1-3.dll)
mingw64(libdbus-glib-1-2.dll)
mingw64(libexpat-1.dll)
mingw64(libgio-2.0-0.dll)
mingw64(libglib-2.0-0.dll)
mingw64(libgobject-2.0-0.dll)
mingw64(msvcrt.dll)
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
$ rpm --query --requires mingw64-dbus-glib-static
mingw64-dbus-glib = 0.100-4.fc18
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
$ rpm --query --provides mingw32-dbus-glib
mingw32-dbus-glib = 0.100-4.fc18
mingw32(libdbus-glib-1-2.dll)
$ rpm --query --provides mingw32-dbus-glib-static
mingw32-dbus-glib-static = 0.100-4.fc18
$ rpm --query --provides mingw64-dbus-glib
mingw64-dbus-glib = 0.100-4.fc18
mingw64(libdbus-glib-1-2.dll)
$ rpm --query --provides mingw64-dbus-glib-static
mingw64-dbus-glib-static = 0.100-4.fc18
$ wget --quiet
http://dbus.freedesktop.org/releases/dbus-glib/dbus-glib-0.100.tar.gz -O - |
md5sum
d33959a9c0c6a158f5ac6d640316e89e -
$ md5sum dbus-glib-0.100.tar.gz
d33959a9c0c6a158f5ac6d640316e89e dbus-glib-0.100.tar.gz
+ OK
! Needs to be looked into
/ Not applicable
[+] Compliant with generic Fedora Packaging Guidelines
[+] Source package name is prefixed with 'mingw-'
[+] Spec file starts with %{?mingw_package_header}
[+] BuildRequires: mingw32-filesystem >= 95 is in the .spec file
[+] BuildRequires: mingw64-filesystem >= 95 is in the .spec file
[+] Spec file contains %package sections for both mingw32 and mingw64 packages
[+] Binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are noarch
[+] Spec file contains %{?mingw_debug_package} after the %description section
[+] Uses one of the macros %mingw_configure, %mingw_cmake, or %mingw_cmake_kde4
to configure the package
[+] Uses the macro %mingw_make to build the package
[+] Uses the macro %mingw_make to install the package
[/] If package contains translations, the %mingw_find_lang macro must be used
[+] No binary package named mingw-$pkgname is generated
[!] Libtool .la files are not bundled
[+] .def files are not bundled
[+] Man pages which duplicate native package are not bundled
[+] Info files which duplicate native package are not bundled
[+] Provides of the binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are equal
[!] Requires of the binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are equal
The rpmlint warnings for the -static subpackages are harmless and can be
ignored
The mingw32 package seems to depend on libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll while the mingw64
package doesn't. This may be caused by the fact that I'm already using
mingw-gcc 4.8 here (which uses SEH exceptions instead of SjLj exceptions
for the win64 target by default). We can investigate this later, but
it isn't a show-stopper for now
=
The package mingw-dbus-glib is APPROVED by epienbro
=
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=3kj78uAClM&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 851677] Review Request: mingw-dbus-glib - MinGW build of GLib bindings for D-Bus
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851677 greg.helli...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |mingw-dbus-glib - D-Bus |mingw-dbus-glib - MinGW |Message Bus System |build of GLib bindings for ||D-Bus --- Comment #7 from greg.helli...@gmail.com --- Added patch comment - the issue is present in git by removal of the autofoo check. Added the extra arguments to autoreconf I had updated the Summary field to match the native packages, so I'm updating the ticket to match. http://dl.thehellings.com/mingw32/dbus-glib/mingw-dbus-glib-0.100-4.fc18.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=igsNCuQ0c4&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 904658] New: Review Request: radium-compressor: an audio compressor for JACK
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904658 Bug ID: 904658 Summary: Review Request: radium-compressor: an audio compressor for JACK Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: brendan.jones...@gmail.com Radium-compressor is a standalone audio compressor for use with JACK. It features an intuitive UI using the Qt toolkit and uses Faust generated classes to handle DSP. SPEC: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/reviews/radium-compressor.spec SRPM: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/reviews/radium-compressor-0.5.1-1.fc18.src.rpm rpmlint /home/bsjones/rpmbuild/SRPMS/radium-compressor-0.5.1-1.fc18.src.rpm /home/bsjones/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/radium-compressor-0.5.1-1.fc18.x86_64.rpm ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/radium-compressor.spec radium-compressor.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary radium_compressor 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6ZkLQhArqh&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 851677] Review Request: mingw-dbus-glib - D-Bus Message Bus System
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851677 --- Comment #6 from Erik van Pienbroek --- BTW, is the summary used in this review ticket correct? It should match the summary as mentioned in the spec file: MinGW build of GLib bindings for D-Bus -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=9aAdu6M7e8&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 851677] Review Request: mingw-dbus-glib - D-Bus Message Bus System
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851677 --- Comment #5 from Erik van Pienbroek --- The latest .src.rpm fails to build in rawhide due to more strict behaviour of automake: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4827/4904827/build.log It should be resolvable by replacing your autoreconf call with 'autoreconf --install --force' Please also add a comment which explains the patch does and where you got it. If you got it from the upstream source repository then please also mention the git/svn/... revision number. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vbxEGoti5T&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 891191] nodejs-fstream-ignore - A thing for ignoring files based on globs
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891191 --- Comment #6 from T.C. Hollingsworth --- Ping? Don't mean to be a bother but I'm getting yelled at for having missing deps in Rawhide. ;-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pSQrvgclek&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 903762] Review Request: nodejs-tobi-cookie - A cookie handling and cookie jar library for Node.js
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903762 T.C. Hollingsworth changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(tchollingsworth@g | |mail.com) | --- Comment #2 from T.C. Hollingsworth --- Thanks for yet another review! This adds the missing %build section: Spec: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/npm/nodejs-tobi-cookie.spec SRPM: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/npm/nodejs-tobi-cookie-0.3.2-2.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=uUK5NoDipn&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 891229] nodejs-request - Simplified HTTP request client
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891229 --- Comment #12 from T.C. Hollingsworth --- Sorry, must have forgot to `scp` it. The above URLs are fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Jz1BiVt5xu&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 829017] Review Request: drupal6-media_youtube - Youtube Video Module for Drupal6
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829017 Shawn Iwinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||shawn.iwin...@gmail.com Flags||needinfo?(ansi...@redhat.co ||m) --- Comment #1 from Shawn Iwinski --- This module appears to require some Zend libraries. Are these optional? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=x4xOvRQ6Mx&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 877651] Review Request: sagemath - A free open-source mathematics software system
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877651 --- Comment #37 from Paulo Andrade --- Only rawhide build should work, f18 should fail until https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/eclib-20120830-1.fc18 hits f18 stable. Update: - Update to sagemath 5.6. - Remove no longer required patch to build with system cython. Spec URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/sagemath.spec SRPM URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/sagemath/SRPMS/sagemath-5.6-1.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=SGbbk4dilu&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828998] Review Request: drupal6-media_vimeo - Vimeo Video Module for Drupal6
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828998 Shawn Iwinski changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|NotReady| --- Comment #2 from Shawn Iwinski --- (In reply to comment #1) > After quick review, missing "drupal6-emvideo" dependency Nevermind! I missed that emvideo was a sub-module of emfield. I'm hoping to get the drupal packaging spec updated so virtual provides should be listed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=UF8b0xPYpU&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828998] Review Request: drupal6-media_vimeo - Vimeo Video Module for Drupal6
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828998 Shawn Iwinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||shawn.iwin...@gmail.com Whiteboard||NotReady --- Comment #1 from Shawn Iwinski --- After quick review, missing "drupal6-emvideo" dependency -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8xuVRDuq4S&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 904639] Review Request: rubygem-unf - Wrapper library to bring Unicode Normalization Form support to Ruby/JRuby
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904639 Mamoru TASAKA changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||904640 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ckxXmdqnI3&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 904640] Review Request: rubygem-domain_name - Domain Name manipulation library for Ruby
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904640 Mamoru TASAKA changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||904639 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru TASAKA --- This bug depends on rubygem-unf, review request bug 904639 . Local mock build log: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/mechanize-related/MOCK-rubygem-domain_name.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=29cSX3Bik5&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892314] Review Request: rubygem-unf_ext - Unicode Normalization Form support library for CRuby
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892314 Mamoru TASAKA changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||904639 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xs9MsAWr0t&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 904639] Review Request: rubygem-unf - Wrapper library to bring Unicode Normalization Form support to Ruby/JRuby
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904639 Mamoru TASAKA changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||892314 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru TASAKA --- This packge depends on rubygem-unf_ext, review request bug 892314 . Local mock build log for F-19: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/mechanize-related/MOCK-rubygem-unf.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=DvEK5j2W30&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 904639] New: Review Request: rubygem-unf - Wrapper library to bring Unicode Normalization Form support to Ruby/JRuby
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904639 Bug ID: 904639 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-unf - Wrapper library to bring Unicode Normalization Form support to Ruby/JRuby Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: mtas...@fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/mechanize-related/rubygem-unf.spec SRPM URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/mechanize-related/rubygem-unf-0.0.5-1.fc.src.rpm Description: This is a wrapper library to bring Unicode Normalization Form support to Ruby/JRuby. Fedora Account System Username: mtasaka -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PpE9wDvRal&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 904640] New: Review Request: rubygem-domain_name - Domain Name manipulation library for Ruby
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904640 Bug ID: 904640 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-domain_name - Domain Name manipulation library for Ruby Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: mtas...@fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/mechanize-related/rubygem-domain_name.spec SRPM URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/mechanize-related/rubygem-domain_name-0.5.7-1.fc.src.rpm Description: This is a Domain Name manipulation library for Ruby. It can also be used for cookie domain validation based on the Public Suffix List. Fedora Account System Username: mtasaka -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=3LdH7tT6cf&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 771254] Review Request: libva-vdpau-driver - HW video decode support for VDPAU platforms
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771254 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru TASAKA --- ping? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=digg2RoGyN&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 851677] Review Request: mingw-dbus-glib - D-Bus Message Bus System
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851677 --- Comment #4 from greg.helli...@gmail.com --- Oops, I build that second -2 off of my original, buggy spec file instead of continuing off the earlier -2. I've replaced it with the proper -3 http://dl.thehellings.com/mingw32/dbus-glib/mingw-dbus-glib-0.100-3.fc18.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MDa7sgjgsI&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 829775] Review Request: drupal6-markdown - Markdown modules for drupal6
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829775 Shawn Iwinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||shawn.iwin...@gmail.com Whiteboard||NotReady --- Comment #1 from Shawn Iwinski --- Please update to latest upstream version (1.3 as of 2013-01-26) and clear "NotReady" Whiteboard before review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=z8JTkZQeHa&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 829750] Review Request: drupal6-insert - Insert module for Drupal6
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829750 Shawn Iwinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||shawn.iwin...@gmail.com Whiteboard||NotReady --- Comment #1 from Shawn Iwinski --- Please update to latest upstream version (1.2 as of 2013-01-26) before review and clear "NotReady" Whiteboard. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qm4akJWM4t&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 902006] Review Request: pylibpcap - A Python module for libpcap
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902006
--- Comment #3 from Michael J Gruber ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Thanks
>
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > pylibpcap.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
> > /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/_pcapmodule.so 0775L
>
> fixed
Well, rather: changed ;)
Now there are unstripped symbols because the .so
is not executable. It has to be 755, as I tried to indicate.
That's probably also the reason why the debug package is empty now.
> > %files
> > %doc ChangeLog COPYING README
> > %{python_sitearch}/
> > %{python_sitearch}/%{name}*.egg-info
> >
> > The second to last line makes your package own all of sitearch. If you use
> >
> > %{python_sitearch}/*
> >
> > instead of both lines you own only what you install there, which is how it
> > should be.
>
> fixed
>
> Updated files:
> Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pylibpcap.spec
> SRPM URL:
> http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pylibpcap-0.6.4-2.fc17.src.rpm
Rest seems OK.
Please use rpmlint -i -v on all produced rpms in order to catch errors before I
do ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Uj3KF3j2DQ&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890538] Review Request: kde-gtk-config - KCM module to configure GTK2 and GTK3 applications appearance under KDE
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890538 Kevin Kofler changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Depends On|201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hTGaWq5rEK&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 851677] Review Request: mingw-dbus-glib - D-Bus Message Bus System
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851677
--- Comment #3 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
Changed license field
This package wasn't using %{summary} tags that I could see, but I also wasn't
following the MinGW styles for them. I've updated that.
I removed the config.cache fields and modified configure.ac with a patch and
configure script argument. The check that was failing has been removed in
dbus-glib's current git head, so the next release should obviate the need for
this patch.
New URLs:
http://dl.thehellings.com/mingw32/dbus-glib/mingw-dbus-glib.spec
http://dl.thehellings.com/mingw32/dbus-glib/mingw-dbus-glib-0.100-2.fc18.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=P1BvDXrpkY&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 885344] Review Request: php-guzzle-Guzzle - PHP HTTP client library and framework for building RESTful web service clients
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885344 --- Comment #4 from Shawn Iwinski --- Updated to upstream version 3.1.1 Spec URL: http://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SPECS/php-guzzle-Guzzle.spec SRPM URL: http://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SRPMS/php-guzzle-Guzzle-3.1.1-1.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nJeFTNyhh3&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 851677] Review Request: mingw-dbus-glib - D-Bus Message Bus System
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851677
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek ---
Taking for review
Regarding your comment about the license: I think it should be good enough to
use the same license tag as used by the native dbus-glib package (thus AFL and
GPLv2+).
Please don't use the %{summary} tags. Each subpackage has a different goal
(win32/win64 and shared/static) so each subpackage should have its own summary.
Why are you using config.cache files? They should only be used when absolutely
necessary. It might be necessary to patch the configure.in file. Patching is
more preferred here as the change can then be proposed for inclusion upstream
and other users can benefit from it as well without having to use hacks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=mWbnjX0Dwq&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 851683] Review Request: mingw-gconf2 - MinGW Windows port of the GNOME 2.x Desktop Configuration Database System
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851683 greg.helli...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=TXe01mta7g&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 885344] Review Request: php-guzzle-Guzzle - PHP HTTP client library and framework for building RESTful web service clients
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885344 --- Comment #3 from Shawn Iwinski --- (In reply to comment #2) > I notice upstream have release some new versions (latest is 3.1.1) > > Do you plan an update before review ? Yes, I was already planning on trying to update this weekend. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xYwREQHd0M&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 851683] Review Request: mingw-gconf2 - MinGW Windows port of the GNOME 2.x Desktop Configuration Database System
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851683 greg.helli...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX |--- Keywords||Reopened -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=f8uUfuzNqD&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 904634] Review Request: mingw-sword - MinGW build of a cross-platform scripture text library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904634 greg.helli...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-mingw@lists.fedorapr ||oject.org Alias||mingw-sword -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HQnVfNtJw7&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 904634] New: Review Request: mingw-sword - MinGW build of a cross-platform scripture text library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904634 Bug ID: 904634 Summary: Review Request: mingw-sword - MinGW build of a cross-platform scripture text library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: greg.helli...@gmail.com Spec URL: http://dl.thehellings.com/mingw32/sword/mingw-sword-1.6.2+svn2778-1.fc17.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://dl.thehellings.com/mingw32/sword/mingw-sword.spec Description: SWORD is a cross-platform C++ library for storage, retrieval, conversion, and search of texts with an emphasis on Biblical texts, commentaries, and related works. Fedora Account System Username: greghellings -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ZSaZ9vUtbR&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 903766] Review Request: php-PhpOption - Option type for PHP
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903766 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=OKvywtXvxH&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 903766] Review Request: php-PhpOption - Option type for PHP
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903766 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- php-PhpOption-1.1.0-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HHabEekhJ8&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 903767] Review Request: php-Metadata - Class/method/property metadata management in PHP
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903767 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- php-Metadata-1.1.1-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HCCYr3Ft58&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 903767] Review Request: php-Metadata - Class/method/property metadata management in PHP
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903767 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=h5welwXVB8&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892682] Review Request: sugar-fototoon - A cartoon creating game for Sugar
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892682 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- sugar-fototoon-13-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=VEYiu3j4jF&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 887488] Review Request: sugar-words - A multi lingual dictionary with speech synthesis for sugar
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887488 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2013-01-26 10:58:24 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=RJARzqxQMi&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 887488] Review Request: sugar-words - A multi lingual dictionary with speech synthesis for sugar
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887488 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- sugar-words-19-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=TE2z9ruXY3&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892682] Review Request: sugar-fototoon - A cartoon creating game for Sugar
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892682 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- sugar-fototoon-13-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bgT3UEq5JJ&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 896019] Review Request: php-pear-Text-CAPTCHA - Generation of CAPTCHAs
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896019 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- php-pear-Text-CAPTCHA-0.4.4-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=d5secXr48J&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892682] Review Request: sugar-fototoon - A cartoon creating game for Sugar
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892682 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2013-01-26 10:56:27 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Fe0Ha6Njo4&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 896019] Review Request: php-pear-Text-CAPTCHA - Generation of CAPTCHAs
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896019 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=iDLAccm2UZ&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892682] Review Request: sugar-fototoon - A cartoon creating game for Sugar
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892682 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- sugar-fototoon-13-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=sdPzOPvoU9&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 749812] Review Request: sugar-fractionbounce - A game which teaches fractions and estimations
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749812 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- sugar-fractionbounce-15-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=srVlgNBpgH&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 749812] Review Request: sugar-fractionbounce - A game which teaches fractions and estimations
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749812 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2013-01-26 10:55:08 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=DOxz3Oq04Q&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 893200] Review Request: valyriatear - Valyria Tear is a free 2D J-RPG based on the Hero of Allacrost engine
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893200 Bug 893200 depends on bug 893887, which changed state. Bug 893887 Summary: Unable to build against luabind with latest gcc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893887 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PP2xlMMODF&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 886103] Review Request: plexus-root-pom - Plexus Root POM file
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886103 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2013-01-26 10:53:38 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=etpjxwL1BK&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 886103] Review Request: plexus-root-pom - Plexus Root POM file
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886103 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- plexus-root-pom-1.0.3-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=DEFTjTd3Nr&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894482] Review Request: rubygem-openshift-origin-auth-kerberos - OpenShift plugin for kerberos auth service
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894482 --- Comment #6 from Michael Scherer --- http://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/openshift-origin/rubygem-openshift-origin-auth-kerberos-1.1.1-4.fc18.src.rpm => 404 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=EuhCM2KIwy&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 885344] Review Request: php-guzzle-Guzzle - PHP HTTP client library and framework for building RESTful web service clients
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885344 --- Comment #2 from Remi Collet --- I notice upstream have release some new versions (latest is 3.1.1) Do you plan an update before review ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bwNk5AZrwk&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894482] Review Request: rubygem-openshift-origin-auth-kerberos - OpenShift plugin for kerberos auth service
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894482 Michael Scherer changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@zarb.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zkqTAzb10d&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 889723] Review Request: kde-plasma-applicationname - QML plasmoid to display the application title of the focused window
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889723 Mario Blättermann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Whiteboard|FE-DEADREVIEW | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=RrSJwlCMsC&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890538] Review Request: kde-gtk-config - KCM module to configure GTK2 and GTK3 applications appearance under KDE
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890538 Mario Blättermann changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Depends On||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Whiteboard|NotReady| Last Closed||2013-01-26 08:15:15 --- Comment #5 from Mario Blättermann --- I'm no longer interested to maintain this package. Closing it as FE-DEADREVIEW. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ELou0XLfnO&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 889723] Review Request: kde-plasma-applicationname - QML plasmoid to display the application title of the focused window
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889723 Mario Blättermann changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Whiteboard||FE-DEADREVIEW Last Closed||2013-01-26 08:11:42 --- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann --- I'm no longer interested to maintain this package. Closing it as FE-DEADREVIEW. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=mVk7AT8lWi&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 885409] Review Request: mate-applets - MATE Desktop panel applets
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885409
--- Comment #6 from leigh scott ---
Please remove this as this package has no libs
find %{buildroot} -name '*.la' -exec rm -rf {} ';'
find %{buildroot} -name '*.a' -exec rm -rf {} ';'
Also please consider splitting package into separate applet subpackages.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Kem1Dw8PWl&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858058] Review Request: mingw-qt5-qtbase - Qt5 for Windows - QtBase component
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858058 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Erik van Pienbroek --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: mingw-qt5-qtbase Short Description: Qt5 for Windows - QtBase component Owners: epienbro Branches: f17 f18 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=UR2mCgr9kK&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 903829] Review Request: perl-Time-Interval - Convert seconds to human readable form
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903829 --- Comment #2 from Normunds --- All packages mentioned below were tested with rpmlint, mock (for i386 arch) and koji (16, 17, 18, 19, rawhide). These are my first packages for Fedora, so if you find something to improve in one of them, don't bother, I'll check other packages for reported problems. Need sponsor. bug 903824 perl-Convert-Age.spec bug 903826 perl-Net-Domain-TLD.spec bug 903829 perl-Time-Interval.spec bug 904328 perl-Config-ApacheFormat.spec bug 904329 perl-Data-Validate-Domain.spec bug 904330 perl-Data-Validate-IP.spec bug 904331 perl-Shell.spec Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Ebq4vFmfCW&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 903826] Review Request: perl-Net-Domain-TLD - Work with TLD names
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903826 --- Comment #2 from Normunds --- All packages mentioned below were tested with rpmlint, mock (for i386 arch) and koji (16, 17, 18, 19, rawhide). These are my first packages for Fedora, so if you find something to improve in one of them, don't bother, I'll check other packages for reported problems. Need sponsor. bug 903824 perl-Convert-Age.spec bug 903826 perl-Net-Domain-TLD.spec bug 903829 perl-Time-Interval.spec bug 904328 perl-Config-ApacheFormat.spec bug 904329 perl-Data-Validate-Domain.spec bug 904330 perl-Data-Validate-IP.spec bug 904331 perl-Shell.spec Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NNQNNoz0UD&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 903824] Review Request: perl-Convert-Age - converts integer seconds into a compact form and back
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903824 --- Comment #2 from Normunds --- All packages mentioned below were tested with rpmlint, mock (for i386 arch) and koji (16, 17, 18, 19, rawhide). These are my first packages for Fedora, so if you find something to improve in one of them, don't bother, I'll check other packages for reported problems. Need sponsor. bug 903824 perl-Convert-Age.spec bug 903826 perl-Net-Domain-TLD.spec bug 903829 perl-Time-Interval.spec bug 904328 perl-Config-ApacheFormat.spec bug 904329 perl-Data-Validate-Domain.spec bug 904330 perl-Data-Validate-IP.spec bug 904331 perl-Shell.spec Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=cV8Sr3Fp5u&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 904328] Review Request: perl-Config-ApacheFormat - Use Apache format config files
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904328 --- Comment #1 from Normunds --- All packages mentioned below were tested with rpmlint, mock (for i386 arch) and koji (16, 17, 18, 19, rawhide). These are my first packages for Fedora, so if you find something to improve in one of them, don't bother, I'll check other packages for reported problems. Need sponsor. bug 903824 perl-Convert-Age.spec bug 903826 perl-Net-Domain-TLD.spec bug 903829 perl-Time-Interval.spec bug 904328 perl-Config-ApacheFormat.spec bug 904329 perl-Data-Validate-Domain.spec bug 904330 perl-Data-Validate-IP.spec bug 904331 perl-Shell.spec Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=iqQkvnQwEI&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 904329] Review Request: perl-Data-Validate-Domain - Domain validation methods
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904329 --- Comment #1 from Normunds --- All packages mentioned below were tested with rpmlint, mock (for i386 arch) and koji (16, 17, 18, 19, rawhide). These are my first packages for Fedora, so if you find something to improve in one of them, don't bother, I'll check other packages for reported problems. Need sponsor. bug 903824 perl-Convert-Age.spec bug 903826 perl-Net-Domain-TLD.spec bug 903829 perl-Time-Interval.spec bug 904328 perl-Config-ApacheFormat.spec bug 904329 perl-Data-Validate-Domain.spec bug 904330 perl-Data-Validate-IP.spec bug 904331 perl-Shell.spec Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CTij7ELRCR&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 904331] Review Request: perl-Shell - Run shell commands transparently within perl
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904331 --- Comment #1 from Normunds --- All packages mentioned below were tested with rpmlint, mock (for i386 arch) and koji (16, 17, 18, 19, rawhide). These are my first packages for Fedora, so if you find something to improve in one of them, don't bother, I'll check other packages for reported problems. Need sponsor. bug 903824 perl-Convert-Age.spec bug 903826 perl-Net-Domain-TLD.spec bug 903829 perl-Time-Interval.spec bug 904328 perl-Config-ApacheFormat.spec bug 904329 perl-Data-Validate-Domain.spec bug 904330 perl-Data-Validate-IP.spec bug 904331 perl-Shell.spec Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=SdfWm1BJ9T&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 904330] Review Request: perl-Data-Validate-IP - Ipv4 and ipv6 validation methods
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904330 --- Comment #1 from Normunds --- All packages mentioned below were tested with rpmlint, mock (for i386 arch) and koji (16, 17, 18, 19, rawhide). These are my first packages for Fedora, so if you find something to improve in one of them, don't bother, I'll check other packages for reported problems. Need sponsor. bug 903824 perl-Convert-Age.spec bug 903826 perl-Net-Domain-TLD.spec bug 903829 perl-Time-Interval.spec bug 904328 perl-Config-ApacheFormat.spec bug 904329 perl-Data-Validate-Domain.spec bug 904330 perl-Data-Validate-IP.spec bug 904331 perl-Shell.spec Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Bkqtc3BW27&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 903826] Review Request: perl-Net-Domain-TLD - Work with TLD names
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903826 Normunds changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||904329 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Mexam0ETHX&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 904329] Review Request: perl-Data-Validate-Domain - Domain validation methods
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904329 Normunds changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Depends On||903826 ||(perl-Net-Domain-TLD) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YVDfGI38QG&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 904329] Review Request: perl-Data-Validate-Domain - Domain validation methods
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904329 Normunds changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On|903826 | |(perl-Net-Domain-TLD) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=QdWaExwome&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 903826] Review Request: perl-Net-Domain-TLD - Work with TLD names
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903826 Normunds changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|904329 |177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=OnYSi1C3Ea&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 904328] Review Request: perl-Config-ApacheFormat - Use Apache format config files
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904328 Normunds changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ZRmpUuzPZa&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 904330] Review Request: perl-Data-Validate-IP - Ipv4 and ipv6 validation methods
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904330 Normunds changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=n82EwOHR0t&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 904331] Review Request: perl-Shell - Run shell commands transparently within perl
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904331 Normunds changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=EpKSPn8Vem&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 904329] Review Request: perl-Data-Validate-Domain - Domain validation methods
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904329 Normunds changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||903826 ||(perl-Net-Domain-TLD) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0RuV0PGfVL&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 903826] Review Request: perl-Net-Domain-TLD - Work with TLD names
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903826 Normunds changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |904329 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=rll02AtH0U&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 904331] New: Review Request: perl-Shell - Run shell commands transparently within perl
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904331 Bug ID: 904331 Summary: Review Request: perl-Shell - Run shell commands transparently within perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Reporter: l...@rule.lv Spec URL: http://unibackup.rule.lv/FedoraRPM/perl-Shell.spec SRPM URL: http://unibackup.rule.lv/FedoraRPM/perl-Shell-0.72-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: This package is included as a show case, illustrating a few Perl features. It shouldn't be used for production programs. Although it does provide a simple interface for obtaining the standard output of arbitrary commands, there may be better ways of achieving what you need. Fedora Account System Username: normunds -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=EglOUbN13I&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 904330] New: Review Request: perl-Data-Validate-IP - Ipv4 and ipv6 validation methods
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904330
Bug ID: 904330
Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Validate-IP - Ipv4 and ipv6
validation methods
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: l...@rule.lv
Spec URL: http://unibackup.rule.lv/FedoraRPM/perl-Data-Validate-IP.spec
SRPM URL:
http://unibackup.rule.lv/FedoraRPM/perl-Data-Validate-IP-0.14-1.fc16.src.rpm
Description: This module collects ip validation routines to make input
validation, and
untainting easier and more readable.
All functions return an untainted value if the test passes, and undef if it
fails. This means that you should always check for a defined status explicitly.
Don't assume the return will be true. (e.g. is_username('0'))
The value to test is always the first (and often only) argument.
Fedora Account System Username: normunds
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2Nez5A81ka&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 904329] New: Review Request: perl-Data-Validate-Domain - Domain validation methods
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904329
Bug ID: 904329
Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Validate-Domain - Domain
validation methods
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: l...@rule.lv
Spec URL: http://unibackup.rule.lv/FedoraRPM/perl-Data-Validate-Domain.spec
SRPM URL:
http://unibackup.rule.lv/FedoraRPM/perl-Data-Validate-Domain-0.10-1.fc16.src.rpm
Description: This module collects domain validation routines to make input
validation, and
untainting easier and more readable.
All functions return an untainted value if the test passes, and undef if it
fails. This means that you should always check for a defined status explicitly.
Don't assume the return will be true. (e.g. is_username('0'))
The value to test is always the first (and often only) argument.
Fedora Account System Username: normunds
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=tZZsbaplj2&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 904328] New: Review Request: perl-Config-ApacheFormat - Use Apache format config files
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904328 Bug ID: 904328 Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-ApacheFormat - Use Apache format config files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Reporter: l...@rule.lv Spec URL: http://unibackup.rule.lv/FedoraRPM/perl-Config-ApacheFormat.spec SRPM URL: http://unibackup.rule.lv/FedoraRPM/perl-Config-ApacheFormat-1.2-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: This module is designed to parse a configuration file in the same syntax used by the Apache web server (see http://httpd.apache.org for details). This allows you to build applications which can be easily managed by experienced Apache admins. Also, by using this module, you'll benefit from the support for nested blocks with built-in parameter inheritance. This can greatly reduce the amount or repeated information in your configuration files. Fedora Account System Username: normunds -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=cf0Q1fvLqq&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
