[Bug 905742] Review Request: xoscope - Simple powerful oscilloscope
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905742 --- Comment #3 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at --- Great to hear. Fedora Extras doesn't exist anymore for quite some time. If you want to package it, read what Eduardo posted. Otherwise, please don't open a review request. The finished RPM is not useful at all. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hLLCHNwOAga=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 905742] Review Request: xoscope - Simple powerful oscilloscope
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905742 Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at Summary|Review Request: xoscope - |Review Request: xoscope - |simple powerfull |Simple powerful |osciloscope|oscilloscope -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=moFAsSAASea=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 905389] Review Request: rubygem-json15 - JSON implementation in Ruby (version 1.5.x)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905389 --- Comment #3 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com --- (In reply to comment #2) Vít, I have no other use for this package than as a requisite for vagrant, #905396. Next upstream release of vagrant will have fixed this. Current git master can use the json gem that is in f18. Great! So, should I just wait for upstream? I would say this is the best option (or push upstream a bit to release what they have :). Or backport relevant patches, but you might get into troubles due to bundler. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gu0SFp3Qdha=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 905742] Review Request: xoscope - Simple powerful oscilloscope
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905742 --- Comment #2 from brian hurren brianhur...@yahoo.com --- Hi, I have been using xoscope since fedora 8 and I have found it to be excellent when used with sound card. I have found a 64bit x86 version of it already packaged as an RPM (how conveniant) i have installed it on fedora18. the rpm was for a different distro of Linux. (see link above). xoscope is an 8 channel fully functional oscilloscope that can sample from you sound card. it works with alsa. it is in my technical opinion one of the best oscilloscopes out there for Linux and it really should be included with fedora extras and included in the fedora electronics spin. it can sample all the way up tp 44000 khz after installation it required two extra steps first yum install alsa-oss and then modprobe snd_pcm_oss and then it works fine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=EsnD8q0BIda=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 785446] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Argv - Horde command-line argument parsing package
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785446
--- Comment #9 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
Please run the tests during build
%check
src=$(pwd)/%{pear_name}-%{version}
cd %{pear_name}-%{version}/test/$(echo %{pear_name} | sed -e s:_:/:g)
phpunit \
-d include_path=$src/lib:.:%{pear_phpdir} \
-d date.timezone=UTC \
.
Could also replace the %find_lang with a loop.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=D2wuZoNjCqa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 887778] Review Request: cutter - A Unit Testing Framework for C
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887778
--- Comment #6 from HAYASHI Kentaro ken...@gmail.com ---
Thank you for reviewing!
Here is the updated(1.2.2-3 - 1.2.2-4) spec and SRPM.
Spec URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/cutter/files/tmp/cutter.spec/download
SRPM URL:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/cutter/files/tmp/cutter-1.2.2-4.fc18.src.rpm
(In reply to comment #5)
Here is the result of rpmlint:
$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/* |grep -v spell|grep -v no-doc
6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings.
[...]
So, let's examine the spec changes:
BuildRequires: autoconf
%prep
...
autoconf
Rebuilding Autotools' files typically belongs into the %build section.
That's the more appropriate/convenient place, because one could still run
rpmbuild -bp cutter.spec (or even with --nodeps if the build requirements
are not installed) and get only the patched/prepared source tree, e.g. when
rediffing patches.
The fedora-review script also fails when the %prep section runs tools that
are not available outside the Mock build environment.
Fixed! (fedora-review works)
%package report
Requires: goffice08
Explicitly depending on the goffice08 package name is not necessary and
bears a higher risk of needing an unnecessary rebuild/update in the future
or being wrong.
Building with goffice08 libraries results in automatically detected
dependencies on the actual libraries:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Explicit_Requires
For example:
$ rpm -qpR cutter-report-1.2.2-3.fc18.x86_64.rpm |grep off
goffice08
libgoffice-0.8.so.8()(64bit)
$ repoquery --whatprovides 'libgoffice-0.8.so.8()(64bit)'
goffice08-0:0.8.17-8.fc18.x86_64
Imagine the lib moving to package goffice08-libs.
%package gui
Requires: gtk2
%package gstreamer
Requires: gstreamer
Similarly for those two subpackages.
Fixed!
%package gstreamer
Summary:Cutter GStreamer plugin
%description gstreamer
Cutter GStreamer plugin.
Not a blocker, but the description (and %summary) could be a bit more
verbose and try to tell _what_ this package does related to GStreamer. That
is not obvious even with the two lines of the description copied from the
base package. As not to confuse ordinary GStreamer users, who search for
real GStreamer plug-ins.
Updated package description.
+%files gui
+%defattr(-, root, root, -)
%defattr is optional for Fedora and EL = 5:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_Permissions
(
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/
GuidelinesAndPolicies#Distribution_specific_guidelines )
+%dir %{_libdir}/cutter
+%dir %{_libdir}/cutter/module
+%dir %{_libdir}/cutter/module/factory
+%dir %{_libdir}/cutter/module/factory/ui
+%dir %{_libdir}/cutter/module/ui
Here it gets a little bit complicated, because there are multiple
subpackages that store files in these directories. The guidelines say:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:
Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership
| Directory ownership is a little more complex than file
| ownership. Packages must own all directories they put files in,
| except for:
|
| [...]
|
| any directories owned by the filesystem, man, or other explicitly
| created -filesystem packages
|
| any directories owned by other packages in your package's natural
| dependency chain
For cutter this means that since the subpackages depend on the base package,
it is sufficient that the base package contains the needed %dir entries.
Example:
%files report
%{_libdir}/cutter/module/factory/report/pdf_factory.so
%{_libdir}/cutter/module/report/pdf.so
$ rpm -qpR cutter-report-1.2.2-3.fc18.x86_64.rpm |grep cut
cutter(x86-64) = 1.2.2-3.fc18
libcutter.so.0()(64bit)
Fixed to aggregate %dir entries.
If there are many (more) subpackages, it can make sense to move directory
ownership into a *-filesystem package and have all subpackages depend on
that one, but this would be overhead for the Cutter packages so far.
%doc %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/cutter/
The file/directory ownership guidelines covers this special directory. It is
okay for cutter-devel to include the two leading directories instead of
depending on gtk-doc:
%dir %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/
%dir %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/
%doc %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/cutter/
Or simply this to include the dir and everything below it:
%doc %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:
Guidelines#The_directory_is_owned_by_a_package_which_is_not_required_for_your
_package_to_function
Note that several packages don't get it right at all, since directory
ownership isn't simple.
Fixed %doc entry for gtk-doc.
[...]
Finally, and probably the most advanced packaging topic related to Cutter,
is this in the guidelines:
[Bug 905848] New: Review Request: perl-Term-UI - Term::ReadLine user interface made easy
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905848 Bug ID: 905848 Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-UI - Term::ReadLine user interface made easy Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Term-UI/perl-Term-UI.spec SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Term-UI/perl-Term-UI-0.34-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: Term::UI is a transparent way of eliminating the overhead of having to format a question and then validate the reply, informing the user if the answer was not proper and re-issuing the question. Fedora Account System Username: ppisar - This package is intended for rawhide to reincarnate already died perl-Term-UI and to replace perl's sub-package. This package will have been removed from perl core when releasing perl 5.20. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Ic8Jjw6Dp0a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 905742] Review Request: xoscope - Simple powerful oscilloscope
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905742 François Cami f...@fcami.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||f...@fcami.net --- Comment #4 from François Cami f...@fcami.net --- For the record, here is the link to the corresponding SRPM, which needs work: http://mib.pianetalinux.org/MIB/2010.2/srpms/xoscope-2.0-69.1mib2010.2.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=C6N7yGk5cYa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878188] Review Request: qt5-qtbase - Qt5 - QtBase components
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878188 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d...@danny.cz --- Comment #19 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz --- seems bundled copies of pcre and harfbuzz are built ... PCRE auto-detection... () g++ -c -m64 -pipe -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -march=z9-109 -mtune=z10 -O2 -Wall -W -fPIE -I../../../ mkspecs/linux-g++-64 -I. -o pcre.o pcre.cpp pcre.cpp:42:18: fatal error: pcre.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. gmake: *** [pcre.o] Error 1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HR0EPnBxDna=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 889167] Review Request: netatalk-3.0.1
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889167 --- Comment #6 from HAT h...@fa2.so-net.ne.jp --- The netatalk.service file is copied to the /usr/lib/systemd/system. When doing systemctl enable netatalk, symlink will be created in /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants. The configuration file is /etc/afp.conf. The sample files are in /usr/share/doc/netatalk-3.0.2/config.example. The /etc/netatalk directory is not used any longer. http://netatalk.sourceforge.net/3.0/htmldocs/upgrade.html#idp5720640 BTW, official rpm is not updated these days. Is Filip Kocina busy? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=9v0UkG1IV8a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 889546] Review Request: ovirt-guest-agent - oVirt Guest Agent
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889546 Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bhVG8W4a6ha=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878188] Review Request: qt5-qtbase - Qt5 - QtBase components
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878188 --- Comment #20 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz --- also the build needs a LOT of memory, it fails on s390 with 2GB of address space with ... cc1plus: out of memory allocating 285056 bytes after a total of 1320124416 bytes make[2]: *** [.obj/release-shared/qdrawhelper.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs so please apply the s/-O2/-O1/ hack -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=aCENGMUPbVa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 905889] New: Review Request: perl-Text-Soundex - Implementation of the soundex algorithm
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905889 Bug ID: 905889 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Soundex - Implementation of the soundex algorithm Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Text-Soundex/perl-Text-Soundex.spec SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Text-Soundex/perl-Text-Soundex-3.03-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: Soundex is a phonetic algorithm for indexing names by sound, as pronounced in English. This module implements the original soundex algorithm developed by Robert Russell and Margaret Odell, as well as a variation called American Soundex. Fedora Account System Username: ppisar - This package is intended for rawhide only. It will dual-live and replace perl's sub-package later after sub-packaging the module from perl.spec. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=UoxvSiOc0za=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 901365] Review Request: python-mongoengine - A Python Document-Object Mapper for working with MongoDB
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901365 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qAxRsPHn2Na=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 904841] Review Request: ino - Command line toolkit for working with Arduino hardware
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904841 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=E2qwKUi1Cya=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844601] Review Request: perl-Meta-Builder - Tools for creating Meta objects to track custom metrics
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844601 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Meta-Builder Short Description: Tools for creating Meta objects to track custom metrics Owners: jplesnik ppisar psabata Branches: InitialCC: perl-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qYcqEClJIAa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844601] Review Request: perl-Meta-Builder - Tools for creating Meta objects to track custom metrics
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844601 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ApxrBK56UKa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844601] Review Request: perl-Meta-Builder - Tools for creating Meta objects to track custom metrics
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844601 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Meta-Builder-0.003-1.f ||c19 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2013-01-30 07:49:37 --- Comment #5 from Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com --- Thank you for the review and the repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4zOnYjPJ7Qa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844610] Review Request: perl-Exporter-Declare - Exporting done right
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844610 Bug 844610 depends on bug 844601, which changed state. Bug 844601 Summary: Review Request: perl-Meta-Builder - Tools for creating Meta objects to track custom metrics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844601 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=a6AY5sMkZLa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844610] Review Request: perl-Exporter-Declare - Exporting done right
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844610 --- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com --- Spec URL: http://jplesnik.fedorapeople.org/perl-Exporter-Declare/perl-Exporter-Declare.spec SRPM URL: http://jplesnik.fedorapeople.org/perl-Exporter-Declare/perl-Exporter-Declare-0.106-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: Exporter::Declare is a meta-driven exporting tool. Exporter::Declare tries to adopt all the good features of other exporting tools, while throwing away horrible interfaces. Exporter::Declare also provides hooks that allow you to add options and arguments for import. Finally, Exporter::Declare's meta-driven system allows for top-notch introspection. Fedora Account System Username: jplesnik -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4EsUHARDuea=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844610] Review Request: perl-Exporter-Declare - Exporting done right
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844610 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com --- Taking the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=SHdg5f0Ev4a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844621] Review Request: perl-Log-Contextual - Simple logging interface with a contextual log
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844621 --- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com --- Spec URL: http://jplesnik.fedorapeople.org/perl-Log-Contextual/perl-Log-Contextual.spec SRPM URL: http://jplesnik.fedorapeople.org/perl-Log-Contextual/perl-Log-Contextual-0.004300-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: This module is a simple interface to extensible logging. It is bundled with a really basic logger, Log::Contextual::SimpleLogger, but in general you should use a real logger instead of that. For something more serious but not overly complicated, try Log::Dispatchouli. Fedora Account System Username: jplesnik -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=eFdcakd7LRa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844610] Review Request: perl-Exporter-Declare - Exporting done right
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844610 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com --- All good, just filter out the perl(Meta::Builder) underspecified runtime dependency before pushing. Approving. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=SsG8iiAXoZa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844610] Review Request: perl-Exporter-Declare - Exporting done right
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844610 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Exporter-Declare Short Description: Exporting done right Owners: jplesnik ppisar psabata Branches: InitialCC: perl-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=opnYR53tVWa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844610] Review Request: perl-Exporter-Declare - Exporting done right
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844610 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=VabNd5W4Ava=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894482] Review Request: rubygem-openshift-origin-auth-kerberos - OpenShift plugin for kerberos auth service
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894482 --- Comment #11 from Troy Dawson tdaw...@redhat.com --- Hi, I will pull out all the SCL stuff so this can make it into Fedora. I'd like to talk with you offline so we can work with OpenShift upstream on their rubygem spec files. They need to be able to have the packages be built by tito, as well as Koji/Brew. What you see is what they found worked for them. If there is a better, more prefered way, I'm sure they would like to hear it. If we can get the spec file to work with upstream, and still be acceptable with Fedora standards, that would be great. If not, hopefully we can get upstreams spec to not be so different that it's painful to convert to Fedora standards. Expect a new spec/srpm soon. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=t1dLs60fcja=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844621] Review Request: perl-Log-Contextual - Simple logging interface with a contextual log
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844621 Bug 844621 depends on bug 844610, which changed state. Bug 844610 Summary: Review Request: perl-Exporter-Declare - Exporting done right https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844610 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Epg737lqdDa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844610] Review Request: perl-Exporter-Declare - Exporting done right
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844610 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Exporter-Declare-0.106 ||-1.fc19 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2013-01-30 10:46:40 --- Comment #6 from Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com --- Thank you for the review and the repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6tVjYN9KO7a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 895638] Review Request: maven-shared-jar - Maven JAR Utilities
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895638 Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2013-01-30 10:54:05 --- Comment #6 from Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com --- Built in rawhide. Thanks for review, closing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=dzXfa1YuGPa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894482] Review Request: rubygem-openshift-origin-auth-kerberos - OpenShift plugin for kerberos auth service
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894482 --- Comment #12 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com --- (In reply to comment #11) Hi, I will pull out all the SCL stuff so this can make it into Fedora. You don't have to remove everything, just remove the lines we referenced, the rest should be OK, since scl macros are not prohibited in Fedora. I'd like to talk with you offline so we can work with OpenShift upstream on their rubygem spec files. Definitely. They need to be able to have the packages be built by tito, as well as Koji/Brew. What you see is what they found worked for them. If there is a better, more prefered way, I'm sure they would like to hear it. If we can get the spec file to work with upstream, and still be acceptable with Fedora standards, that would be great. If not, hopefully we can get upstreams spec to not be so different that it's painful to convert to Fedora standards. The spec has to allow to build regular RPM as well as SCL RPM without any change, just by choosing different build root. And this spec definitely fails to do so, since on RHEL, it would always build as SCL RPM. But let's move the discussion into more appropriate palce :) Expect a new spec/srpm soon. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=weTrCUUGKEa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 906015] New: Review Request: perl-B-Lint - Perl lint
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906015 Bug ID: 906015 Summary: Review Request: perl-B-Lint - Perl lint Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-B-Lint/perl-B-Lint.spec SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-B-Lint/perl-B-Lint-1.17-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: The B::Lint module is equivalent to an extended version of the -w option of perl. It is named after the program lint which carries out a similar process for C programs. Fedora Account System Username: ppisar - This package is intended for rawhide only. It will dual-live and replace perl.spec's module after sub-packing it. The bundled module will have been removed from perl core when releasing perl 5.20. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=AE7vr3PQVka=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894482] Review Request: rubygem-openshift-origin-auth-kerberos - OpenShift plugin for kerberos auth service
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894482 --- Comment #13 from Troy Dawson tdaw...@redhat.com --- Spec URL: http://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/openshift-origin/rubygem-openshift-origin-auth-kerberos.spec SRPM URL: http://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/openshift-origin/rubygem-openshift-origin-auth-kerberos-1.1.1-5.fc18.src.rpm - Removed scl %if stuff Side note: /etc/openshift/ and /etc/openshift/plugins.d/ are now owned by rubygem-openshift-origin-common -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=oRQ8WQu9lZa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878188] Review Request: qt5-qtbase - Qt5 - QtBase components
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878188 --- Comment #21 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- thanks for pcre, harfbuz... looks like is used only building for mac. As for s390 hack, you mean modifiying %optflags? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=jTjv67vlIxa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 906015] Review Request: perl-B-Lint - Perl lint
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906015 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- Sub-packaged in perl-5.16.2-251.fc19. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YM14vFgSGOa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878188] Review Request: qt5-qtbase - Qt5 - QtBase components
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878188 --- Comment #22 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz --- (In reply to comment #21) thanks for pcre, harfbuz... looks like is used only building for mac. hm, I'll better recheck the logs for harfbuzz presence As for s390 hack, you mean modifiying %optflags? yes, I think it already was in qt4. Or was the reason out of memory during linking? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=45OmG3kv1Ca=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878188] Review Request: qt5-qtbase - Qt5 - QtBase components
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878188 --- Comment #23 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- yeah, qt4 includes a patch for reduced memory wrt libQtWebKit linking. (I assume we'll likely need something similar when we package/review qt5-qtwebkit) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=syszzprGvZa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878188] Review Request: qt5-qtbase - Qt5 - QtBase components
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878188 --- Comment #24 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- Hrm, seems bundled harfbuzz is indeed still used somehow :( -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=cmn3xhIieGa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878188] Review Request: qt5-qtbase - Qt5 - QtBase components
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878188 --- Comment #25 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qt5/qt5-qtbase.spec SRPM URL: Description: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qt5/qt5-qtbase-5.0.0-4.fc18.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Jan 30 2013 Rex Dieter rdie...@fedoraproject.org 5.0.0-4 - %%build: -system-pcre, BR: pkgconfig(libpcre) - use -O1 optimization on lowmem (s390) arch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=IsZshfi1xoa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 891996] Review Request: lua-ldoc - Lua documentation generator
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891996 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- lua-ldoc-1.3.3-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lua-ldoc-1.3.3-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=VCkCnFRT2pa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 891996] Review Request: lua-ldoc - Lua documentation generator
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891996 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- lua-ldoc-1.3.3-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lua-ldoc-1.3.3-1.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=P3gtslcZoCa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 891996] Review Request: lua-ldoc - Lua documentation generator
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891996 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- lua-ldoc-1.3.3-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lua-ldoc-1.3.3-1.fc16 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=QO4qsv2b0ga=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 891996] Review Request: lua-ldoc - Lua documentation generator
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891996 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=eYnZzBjIFFa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 846481] Review Request: cantata - Client for the Music Player Daemon (MPD)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846481 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HGkzDw9Nyaa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 846481] Review Request: cantata - Client for the Music Player Daemon (MPD)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846481 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- cantata-0.9.2-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cantata-0.9.2-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ZLwT3wePJHa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 846481] Review Request: cantata - Client for the Music Player Daemon (MPD)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846481 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- cantata-0.9.2-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cantata-0.9.2-1.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=J8K1Rz4Tt9a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 904841] Review Request: ino - Command line toolkit for working with Arduino hardware
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904841 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nkPR4lNKwHa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 904841] Review Request: ino - Command line toolkit for working with Arduino hardware
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904841 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ino-0.3.5-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ino-0.3.5-1.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=A0TLP1TCL0a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 904841] Review Request: ino - Command line toolkit for working with Arduino hardware
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904841 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ino-0.3.5-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ino-0.3.5-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=mwBvxxtQSca=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 887611] Review Request: vdr-vnsiserver - VDR plugin to handle XBMC clients via VNSI
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887611 --- Comment #20 from Till Bubeck t.bub...@reinform.de --- Here we go. Please find an updated version at Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bubeck/vdr-vnsiserver3.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bubeck/vdr-vnsiserver3-0.9.0-1.fc18.src.rpm Please note, that I changed the packagename to vdr-vnsiserver3 which included the VNSI protocol name, as stated by the package owners: http://forum.xbmc.org/showthread.php?tid=153801 This allows us to create multiple package, one for each VNSI protocol version. The user can then decide, which package to install depending on the protocol version needed by the XBMC. Please note also, that I stay at the released git tag 12.0-Frodo, also it contains the bug described in https://github.com/opdenkamp/xbmc-pvr-addons/issues/160. I did not switch to the experimental branch mentioned in comment #18 because the package owners decided this. See the above issue for an explanation. Basically the experimental branch also is a large refactorization and the authors see the inclusion at too risky at the moment. They will include it after the release. Then I will update, too. Is now anything OK? Could you give the needed flags, after review? THANKS! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=RefBpWBkNUa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 901594] Review Request: php-password-compat - PHP password_* function for PHP 5.3 and 5.4
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901594 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Ns0S4NFbcja=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 901594] Review Request: php-password-compat - PHP password_* function for PHP 5.3 and 5.4
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901594 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-password-compat-1.0.0-4.git58151cf.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-password-compat-1.0.0-4.git58151cf.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7i9OMJdOtha=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 901594] Review Request: php-password-compat - PHP password_* function for PHP 5.3 and 5.4
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901594 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-password-compat-1.0.0-4.git58151cf.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-password-compat-1.0.0-4.git58151cf.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7a8waXZmCba=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878188] Review Request: qt5-qtbase - Qt5 - QtBase components
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878188 --- Comment #26 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz --- I'm still getting c++ killed by the kernel's oom killer even on s390x, but I guess it's because src/gui/painting/qdrawhelper.cpp (200+ KB file) has # pragma GCC optimize O3 I'll do some more tests on both s390 and s390x ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ZjOU84FMNQa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 904843] Review Request: acpica-tools - ACPICA tools for the development and debug of ACPI tables
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904843
--- Comment #12 from Al Stone a...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #10)
On f18, if I do yum list iasl, I get 20100528-6.
Could you please explain the too low part?
Sure. You somehow miss the %{?dist} macro at the end of the Release tag. The
value the macro expands to is not ignored during RPM version comparison:
# rpm --eval %dist
.fc19
# yum list iasl|grep ^iasl
iasl.x86_64 20120913-6.fc19
rawhide
# rpmdev-vercmp 20120913-6.fc19 20120913-6
20120913-6.fc19 20120913-6
Whups. Thanks. I was missing the obvious part (the use of %dist).
what should the version be?
Either = the latest EVR from Rawhide or the next higher Release
value, i.e. either
Obsoletes: iasl = 20120913-6.fc19
or
Obsoletes: iasl 20120913-7
[...]
Provides: iasl 20120913-6
Very unusual. Rather:
Provides: iasl = %{version}-%{release}
Aha. Right. I didn't think that through properly. Many thanks for the
explanation.
[...]
I will need to do is provide a patch to the pmtools
package so that they also use alternatives
Ah, that makes sense, of course.
Cool. Thanks.
This is indeed a snapshot, so the version is now 20130123git,
For a snapshot, you would need to adhere to the following guideline
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control
| There are several cases where upstream is not providing the source
| to you in an upstream tarball. In these cases you must document how
| to generate the tarball used in the rpm either through a spec file
| comment or a script included as a separate SourceX:.
because the URL you've constructed results in 404 not found, as well as
the Packaging Naming Guidelines for snapshot packages (which Antonio has
pointed at):
Version: 20130117
Aha. I'm used to Debian packaging which is a little more
relaxed in this regard.
Which is the last official release of the source tarball, because typically
one doesn't make up own Version numbers, even if it may be possible to
predict the next version. And
Release: 1.20130123git%{?dist}
to apply Fedora's naming guidelines for post-release snapshot packages:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Post-
Release_packages
Alternatively, if you would insist on predicting the next officially
released version, you could apply the pre-release snapshot naming guidelines
(which isn't prettier however because for newer snapshots you would change
also the Version tag, not just the Release):
Version: 20130123
Release: 0.1.20130123git%{?dist}
There, for updates of the package, you would bump the 0. and/or the
snapshot date. For a future officially released tarball, you would update
Version and reset Release back to 1%{?dist}.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages
|
| If the snapshot package is considered a pre-release package,
| you should follow the guidelines listed in Pre-Release Packages
| for snapshot packages,
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-
Release_packages
Hrm. Stepping back a second and rethinking the versioning, it is not
critical to have the latest version from git (nice, but not critical).
I think it would better to drop this and go to something that might
convey more useful info to the user; the upstream git doesn't really
change all that often, either (usually just at release time anyway).
What upstream does is release a version supporting a specific release of
the ACPI specification (5.0, in this case). Then, they periodically
update the implementation (changing the date in the tarball name). So,
my first thought was to do something like this:
Version: 5.0
Release: 1.20130117%{?dist}
and increment the 1. at the beginning of Release for each packaging change
and/or bug fix required, similar to what was suggested above. If I need to
pull something from git, do it as a patch and carry the patch until the next
official release tarball. At the next tarball, reset the release back to
1.date.
Unfortunately...
$ rpmdev-vercmp 5.0-7.20130117.fc18 5.0-1.20130217.fc18
5.0-7.20130117.fc18 5.0-1.20130217.fc18
However, this approach compares properly:
Version: 5.0
Release: 20130117.1%{?dist}
$ rpmdev-vercmp 5.0-20130117.7.fc18 5.0-20130217.1.fc18
5.0-20130117.7.fc18 5.0-20130217.1.fc18
When the ACPI 6.0 specification comes out, 5.0 - 6.0. When a new official
tarball comes out, 20130117 - the new date. If a packaging fix or a new
patch is needed, .1 - .2, and so on.
I'll prepare rpm's with this scheme and post them. Let me know what you think.
My sense is that this approach is just a lot more straightforward and I was
making things more complicated than need be without gaining anything by it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
[Bug 891183] nodejs-combined-stream - A stream that emits multiple other streams one after another
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891183 T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||905814 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=axI400N8WGa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 891186] nodejs-couch-login - A module for doing logged-in requests to a couchdb server
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891186 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0efU6AoaJ5a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 891215] nodejs-npm-registry-client - Client for the npm registry
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891215 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=shbLsNlAAaa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 891189] nodejs-form-data - A module to create readable multipart/form-data streams
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891189 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hTG6a05V68a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 891175] node-gyp - Node.js native addon build tool
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891175 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LVhAdjKZQaa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 891171] Review Request: npm - Node.js package manager
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891171 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0dzamD3q89a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 891229] nodejs-request - Simplified HTTP request client
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891229 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1iDfmcp5C9a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 891229] nodejs-request - Simplified HTTP request client
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891229 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-abbrev-1.0.4-2.fc18, nodejs-ansi-0.1.2-4.fc18, nodejs-async-0.1.22-3.fc18, nodejs-glob-3.1.14-2.fc18, nodejs-inherits-1.0.0-6.fc18, nodejs-graceful-fs-1.1.14-2.fc18, nodejs-minimatch-0.2.9-2.fc18, nodejs-mkdirp-0.3.4-2.fc18, nodejs-mute-stream-0.0.3-3.fc18, nodejs-read-1.0.4-4.fc18, nodejs-read-installed-0.0.4-2.fc18, nodejs-read-package-json-0.1.12-2.fc18, nodejs-retry-0.6.0-2.fc18, nodejs-rimraf-2.1.1-2.fc18, nodejs-slide-1.1.3-4.fc18, nodejs-uid-number-0.0.3-4.fc18, nodejs-sigmund-1.0.0-2.fc18, nodejs-osenv-0.0.3-2.fc18, nodejs-nopt-2.0.0-3.fc18, nodejs-lru-cache-2.2.1-2.fc18, nodejs-mime-1.2.7-2.fc18, nodejs-init-package-json-0.0.7-3.fc18, nodejs-fstream-0.1.21-3.fc18, nodejs-delayed-stream-0.0.5-2.fc18, nodejs-proto-list-1.2.2-2.fc18, nodejs-npm-registry-client-0.2.11-2.fc18, nodejs-form-data-0.0.6-2.fc18, nodejs-which-1.0.5-4.fc18, nodejs-chownr-0.0.1-6.fc18, nodejs-opts-1.2.2-2.fc18, nodejs-yamlish-0.0.5-1.fc18, nodejs-once-1.1.1-2.fc18, nodejs-lockfile-0.2.1-2.fc18, nodejs-ini-1.0.5-2.fc18, nodejs-couch-login-0.1.15-2.fc18, nodejs-archy-0.0.2-5.fc18, nodejs-block-stream-0.0.6-4.fc18, nodejs-config-chain-1.1.3-3.fc18, nodejs-fstream-npm-0.1.3-2.fc18, nodejs-npmconf-0.0.16-3.fc18, nodejs-npmlog-0.0.2-2.fc18, nodejs-charm-0.1.0-1.fc18, node-gyp-0.8.2-3.fc18, nodejs-tar-0.1.14-3.fc18, npm-1.2.1-2.fc18, nodejs-opener-1.3.0-4.fc18, nodejs-semver-1.1.2-1.fc18, nodejs-tobi-cookie-0.3.2-2.fc18, nodejs-fstream-ignore-0.0.5-4.fc18, nodejs-request-2.12.0-5.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0775/npm-1.2.1-2.fc18,nodejs-abbrev-1.0.4-2.fc18,nodejs-ansi-0.1.2-4.fc18,nodejs-async-0.1.22-3.fc18,nodejs-glob-3.1.14-2.fc18,nodejs-inherits-1.0.0-6.fc18,nodejs-graceful-fs-1.1.14-2.fc18,nodejs-minimatch-0.2.9-2.fc18,nodejs-mkdirp-0.3.4-2.fc18,nodejs-mute-stream-0.0.3-3.fc18,nodejs-read-1.0.4-4.fc18,nodejs-read-installed-0.0.4-2.fc18,nodejs-read-package-json-0.1.12-2.fc18,nodejs-retry-0.6.0-2.fc18,nodejs-rimraf-2.1.1-2.fc18,nodejs-slide-1.1.3-4.fc18,nodejs-uid-number-0.0.3-4.fc18,nodejs-sigmund-1.0.0-2.fc18,nodejs-osenv-0.0.3-2.fc18,nodejs-nopt-2.0.0-3.fc18,nodejs-lru-cache-2.2.1-2.fc18,nodejs-mime-1.2.7-2.fc18,nodejs-init-package-json-0.0.7-3.fc18,nodejs-fstream-0.1.21-3.fc18,nodejs-delayed-stream-0.0.5-2.fc18,nodejs-proto-list-1.2.2-2.fc18,nodejs-npm-registry-client-0.2.11-2.fc18,nodejs-form-data-0.0.6-2.fc18,nodejs-which-1.0.5-4.fc18,nodejs-chownr-0.0.1-6.fc18,nodejs-opts-1.2.2-2.fc18,nodejs-yamlish-0.0.5-1.fc18,nodejs! -once-1.1.1-2.fc18,nodejs-lockfile-0.2.1-2.fc18,nodejs-ini-1.0.5-2.fc18,nodejs-couch-login-0.1.15-2.fc18,nodejs-archy-0.0.2-5.fc18,nodejs-block-stream-0.0.6-4.fc18,nodejs-config-chain-1.1.3-3.fc18,nodejs-fstream-npm-0.1.3-2.fc18,nodejs-npmconf-0.0.16-3.fc18,nodejs-npmlog-0.0.2-2.fc18,nodejs-charm-0.1.0-1.fc18,node-gyp-0.8.2-3.fc18,nodejs-tar-0.1.14-3.fc18,nodejs-opener-1.3.0-4.fc18,nodejs-semver-1.1.2-1.fc18,nodejs-tobi-cookie-0.3.2-2.fc18,nodejs-fstream-ignore-0.0.5-4.fc18,nodejs-request-2.12.0-5.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5CplKRKSbUa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 901872] Review Request: python-gd - Python GD module
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901872 --- Comment #8 from Paulo Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com --- Update: - Preserve timestamp of the LICENSE file. Spec URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/python-gd.spec SRPM URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/python-gd-0.56-4.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=DfkRKSseqha=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 904843] Review Request: acpica-tools - ACPICA tools for the development and debug of ACPI tables
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904843 --- Comment #13 from Al Stone a...@redhat.com --- Updated versions now available. Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~ahs3/acpica-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~ahs3/acpica-tools-5.0-20130117.1.fc18.src.rpm Thanks again for all the suggestions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7pA9SF8Ji1a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 889167] Review Request: netatalk-3.0.1
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889167
--- Comment #7 from Bob Gustafson bob...@rcn.com ---
I'm working through the conf's and setup.
I can log into the netatalk machine from a remote Leopard Mac. But cannot
transfer files as yet. Patience.
However, I did see a Seg Fault
[bobg@hoho0 ~]$ ad ls
Jan 30 19:19:33.975314 ad[2557] {netatalk_conf.c:1491} (E:Default):
getvolbypath(/home/bobg/.): no volume for path
macdata
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
[bobg@hoho0 ~]$
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FJciUADb8ya=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 904862] Review Request: php-EasyRdf - A PHP library designed to make it easy to consume and produce RDF
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904862 --- Comment #5 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com --- THANKS Remi! Here's my latest WIP. I added the lib tests and a made a couple other changes. It builds correctly in f18 and dist-6E-epel, but there is a build failure (test failure) in rawhide that I can't figure out -- in the EasyRdf_Serialiser_GraphVizTest::testSerialiseSvg test. I'm not sure if the failure is in this library or some other package because I got different errors when I ran the exact same scratch build yesterday. Any ideas? Changelog: - Tests run by default (i.e. without --with tests) - Fixes for tests - Removed Mac files - Separated docs into sub-package SPEC URL: http://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SPECS/php-EasyRdf.spec SRPM URL: http://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SRPMS/php-EasyRdf-0.7.2-2.fc17.src.rpm rawhide scratch build (FAILED): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4916306 f18 scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4916308 dist-6E-epel scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4916310 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FeMEIcTlD4a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894558] Review Request : ghc-byteorder - Exposes the native endianness or byte ordering of the system
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894558 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||maths...@gmail.com Alias||ghc-byteorder -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=eBZvq4AT14a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 905255] Review Request: open-vm-tools - Open Virtual Machine Tools
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905255 --- Comment #3 from Sankar Tanguturi stangut...@vmware.com --- Thanks for the review comments. I will address the review comments and update the spec files. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=9LEBqIsZyua=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 889167] Review Request: netatalk-3.0.1
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889167 --- Comment #8 from Bob Gustafson bob...@rcn.com --- Odd - I thought I logged in as 'bobg' [bobg@hoho0 ~]$ macusers PID UID Username Name Logintime Mac 749 0root root 13:05 [bobg@hoho0 ~]$ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=wN3mz9G06Fa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 885409] Review Request: mate-applets - MATE Desktop panel applets
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885409 --- Comment #7 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com --- Would rather not split the package at this time. Will remove those commands from the spec after import. Please let me know if there are any other issues -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Yp4RvOjC4Ca=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894558] Review Request : ghc-byteorder - Exposes the native endianness or byte ordering of the system
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894558 --- Comment #2 from Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com --- Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-byteorder/ghc-byteorder.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-byteorder/ghc-byteorder-1.0.3-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: This package is for working with the native byte-ordering of the system. FAS username : narasim Taking over since Narasim is no longer packaging. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=IHZ1QsKSlaa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894558] Review Request : ghc-byteorder - Exposes the native endianness or byte ordering of the system
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894558 --- Comment #3 from Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com --- Darn copy/paste. Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-byteorder/ghc-byteorder.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-byteorder/ghc-byteorder-1.0.3-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: This package is for working with the native byte-ordering of the system. FAS username : mathstuf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=f6B0wBdCRaa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 906160] New: Review Request: python-feedgenerator - Standalone version of django.utils.feedgenerator
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906160 Bug ID: 906160 Summary: Review Request: python-feedgenerator - Standalone version of django.utils.feedgenerator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Reporter: i...@fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~icon/f/python-feedgenerator.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~icon/f/python-feedgenerator-1.5-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: Standalone version of DJango's feed generator for generating ATOM and RSS feeds. Fedora Account System Username: icon -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MB3cZI7Bz0a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 906161] New: Review Request: python-pelican - Generate static sites from reStructuredText or Markdown documents
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906161 Bug ID: 906161 Summary: Review Request: python-pelican - Generate static sites from reStructuredText or Markdown documents Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Reporter: i...@fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~icon/f/python-pelican.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~icon/f/python-pelican-3.1.1-2.fc18.src.rpm Description: A tool to generate a static blog from reStructuredText or Markdown input files. Fedora Account System Username: icon Depends on python-feedgenerator, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906160 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2mTiAE0TX5a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 887611] Review Request: vdr-vnsiserver - VDR plugin to handle XBMC clients via VNSI
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887611 Mohamed El Morabity pikachu.2...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=llgPqefJbQa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 887611] Review Request: vdr-vnsiserver - VDR plugin to handle XBMC clients via VNSI
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887611 --- Comment #21 from Till Bubeck t.bub...@reinform.de --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: vdr-vnsiserver3 Short Description: VDR plugin to handle XBMC clients via VNSI Owners: bubeck Branches: f18 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=AHKXvOvYEha=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 887611] Review Request: vdr-vnsiserver - VDR plugin to handle XBMC clients via VNSI
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887611 Till Bubeck t.bub...@reinform.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=TE1HMKUgkfa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 887611] Review Request: vdr-vnsiserver - VDR plugin to handle XBMC clients via VNSI
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887611 Mohamed El Morabity pikachu.2...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #22 from Mohamed El Morabity pikachu.2...@gmail.com --- Actually, I haven't finished my review yet... I've just set up the fedora-review tag to « ? ». I will review this package later in the morning. Be patient ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NfvqknRQ7qa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 887611] Review Request: vdr-vnsiserver - VDR plugin to handle XBMC clients via VNSI
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887611 --- Comment #23 from Till Bubeck t.bub...@reinform.de --- Uh, sorry. I misunderstood your flag. Sorry! Take your time... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7qTJKI9Zf0a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 904862] Review Request: php-EasyRdf - A PHP library designed to make it easy to consume and produce RDF
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904862 --- Comment #6 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- Yes the rawhide failure is quite strange. As far as it build on f18 and el6 (and with php 5.5.0-dev), you can, I think, temporary ignored the test result on rawhide (you will have to fix it later). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=fw5R62lVcLa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
