[Bug 912602] Review Request: maven-shared-components - Maven Shared Components Parent POM
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912602 Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mizde...@redhat.com Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | --- Comment #1 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com --- This POM file is alread packaged for Fedora (package maven-shared). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=chOT0QTBjja=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 912596] Review Request: maven-shared-resources - A collection of templates that are specific to the Maven project
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912596 Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||mizde...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NNHHDU0qkea=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 912596] Review Request: maven-shared-resources - A collection of templates that are specific to the Maven project
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912596 Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=44MoL5lL99a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 912602] Review Request: maven-shared-components - Maven Shared Components Parent POM
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912602 --- Comment #2 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com --- If you want maven-shared to be renamed to maven-shared-components then you need to follow the guidelines [1]. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Renaming_Process -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=GGbEqgqytoa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 912596] Review Request: maven-shared-resources - A collection of templates that are specific to the Maven project
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912596
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RELEASE_PENDING
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mizde...@redhat.com
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags||fedora-review+
Status|RELEASE_PENDING |POST
--- Comment #1 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[-] = Not applicable
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Java:
[x]: Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
Maven:
[x]: Pom files have correct add_maven_depmap call
[x]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even
when building with ant
[x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used
[x]: Packages DOES NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-
utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
[x]: Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x]: Packages use %{_mavenpomdir} instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in
[Bug 886900] Review Request: arm-none-eabi-binutils-cs - GNU Binutils for cross-compilation for ARM target
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886900
--- Comment #3 from Tomas Hozza tho...@redhat.com ---
Please update SRPM to contain the same SPEC file you have listed in Spec URL.
Thank you.
Diff spec file in url and in SRPM
-
---
/home/thozza/tmp/886900-arm-none-eabi-binutils-cs/srpm/arm-none-eabi-binutils-cs.spec
2013-02-18 16:11:54.169586124 +0100
+++
/home/thozza/tmp/886900-arm-none-eabi-binutils-cs/srpm-unpacked/arm-none-eabi-binutils-cs.spec
2013-02-18 16:11:54.338586420 +0100
@@ -1,2 +1,7 @@
+# The following three variables define the target tuple
+%global processor_arch arm
+%global platform none
+%global abieabi
+
# CodeSourcery releases are identified by a date, a release number,
# and a package number for downloading from their web site
@@ -5,6 +10,5 @@
%global cs_pkgnum 10925
-%global processor_arch arm
-%global target %{processor_arch}-none-eabi
+%global target %{processor_arch}-%{platform}-%{abi}
Name: %{target}-binutils-cs
@@ -19,6 +23,6 @@
Source0:binutils-%{cs_date}-%{cs_rel}.tar.bz2
#Source0 origin:
-#wget
https://sourcery.mentor.com/GNUToolchain/package%{cs_pkgnum}/public/%{target}/%{processor_arch}-%{cs_date}-%{cs_rel}-%{target}.src.tar.bz2
-#tar jxvf %{processor_arch}-%{cs_date}-%{cs_rel}-%{target}.src.tar.bz2
+#wget
https://sourcery.mentor.com/GNUToolchain/package%{cs_pkgnum}/public/%{target}/%{processor_arg}-%{cs_date}-%{cs_rel}-%{target}.src.tar.bz2
+#tar jxvf %{processor_arg}-%{cs_date}-%{cs_rel}-%{target}.src.tar.bz2
Source1:README.fedora
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vVaLgaL9fGa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 912596] Review Request: maven-shared-resources - A collection of templates that are specific to the Maven project
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912596 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|ASSIGNED Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: maven-shared-resources Short Description: A collection of templates that are specific to the Maven project Owners: gil Branches: f18 f19 InitialCC: java-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=QDlbmHBaOEa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 908168] Review Request: openprops - A fork of java.util.Properties from OpenJDK
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908168 Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com --- Package is good, APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1RKDtMTOfna=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 886900] Review Request: arm-none-eabi-binutils-cs - GNU Binutils for cross-compilation for ARM target
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886900 --- Comment #4 from Michal Hlavinka mhlav...@redhat.com --- (In reply to comment #3) Please update SRPM to contain the same SPEC file you have listed in Spec URL. done -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=UUAyqlUpdga=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858027] Review Request: jquery-ui - JavaScript library of interface components based on jQuery
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858027 Felix Schwarz felix.schw...@oss.schwarz.eu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||felix.schwarz@oss.schwarz.e ||u --- Comment #2 from Felix Schwarz felix.schw...@oss.schwarz.eu --- Why is nodejs a dependency for jQuery UI? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7okFdHaMOha=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 910699] Review Request: pagekite - makes localhost servers visible to the world
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910699 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||msu...@redhat.com Depends On||910146 Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|msu...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com --- All the python files do have python shebang, because the upstream also distributes as an embedded app (in one file). If this is an issue for Fedora, I will have to remove this in the %build section. Please do so. Or add executable flag to those files. Whatever you feel as appropriate. [!]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#BuildRequires This package requires python-SocksipyChain but I do not see such package in Fedora. Aha bug 910146. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=e1FXBd4V6da=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 910146] Review Request: python-SocksipyChain - A Python SOCKS/HTTP Proxy module
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910146 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||910699 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=OrR9HoPF4Ma=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 912681] New: Review Request: canl-java - EMI Common Authentication library - bindings for Java
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912681 Bug ID: 912681 Summary: Review Request: canl-java - EMI Common Authentication library - bindings for Java Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/canl-java.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/canl-java-1.1.0-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: This is the Java part of the EMI caNl -- the Common Authentication Library. This package complements the canl-c package that has the corresponding c library. Fedora Account System Username: ellert -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gDIPcHjUTia=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 912686] New: Review Request: sfnttool - A Library for Using, Editing, and Creating SFNT-based Fonts
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912686 Bug ID: 912686 Summary: Review Request: sfnttool - A Library for Using, Editing, and Creating SFNT-based Fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: pnem...@redhat.com Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/sfnttool.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/sfnttool-0-0.1.r125.fc18.src.rpm Description: sfntly is a Java library for using, editing, and creating sfnt container based fonts (e.g. OpenType, TrueType). This library was initially created by Google's Font Team. The basic features of sfntly are the reading, editing, and writing of an sfnt container font. Fedora Account System Username: pnemade -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bME6a95soia=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 910146] Review Request: python-SocksipyChain - A Python SOCKS/HTTP Proxy module
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910146 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msu...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com --- [!]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#BuildRequires -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=mtbomUOtuea=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 771462] Review Request: Wnotes - Graphical text notes for X Window System display
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771462 Soumya Kanti Chakraborty sou...@dgplug.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(sou...@dgplug.org | |) | --- Comment #10 from Soumya Kanti Chakraborty sou...@dgplug.org --- I spoke with the developer earlier and I didn't get any suitable reply about gnome3 and its working. Also any other new releases has not come up. I think we can close the review for it. Thanks Soumya -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ayrD4iZeMQa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878188] Review Request: qt5-qtbase - Qt5 - QtBase components
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878188 Ngo Than t...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|t...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=dp16FzFNxda=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 912686] Review Request: sfnttool - A Library for Using, Editing, and Creating SFNT-based Fonts
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912686 --- Comment #1 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com --- This is my first Java package and I really need a help here to fix any packaging issues for sfnttool. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=kZvAszDghua=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878188] Review Request: qt5-qtbase - Qt5 - QtBase components
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878188 Ngo Than t...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #33 from Ngo Than t...@redhat.com --- qtchooser is enable by default in qt5-base, do we really want it? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=cw6HqAr8nCa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 912596] Review Request: maven-shared-resources - A collection of templates that are specific to the Maven project
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912596 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0dWvUp3io0a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 911673] Review Request: swell-foop - GNOME colored tiles puzzle game
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911673 --- Comment #1 from Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com --- Spec URL: http://declera.com/~yaneti/swell-foop/swell-foop.spec SRPM URL: http://declera.com/~yaneti/swell-foop/swell-foop-3.7.90-1.fc19.src.rpm 3.7.90-1 - New upstream release 3.7.90 - Fix desktop file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vWG7hqTY1ua=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 912686] Review Request: sfnttool - A Library for Using, Editing, and Creating SFNT-based Fonts
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912686 Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||socho...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com --- So few issues first: - buildroot is no longer needed - Source0 is unversioned so it can change and it's going to be hard to notice. Contacting upstream about properly versioning their releases would be a good idea - related to above to ensure stable tarball whenever it's recreated it would be better to use SVN directly and export exact revision make a tarball out of it (with comment explaining the steps) - java/lib directory contains bundled libraries (icu4j, junit) these need to be removed during %prep and proper BR added -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HfAsMUKHCOa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 912310] Review Request: jnr-unixsocket - Unix sockets for Java
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912310 Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||mizde...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mizde...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com --- I am taking this review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=wvzKCwYY1ca=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 912310] Review Request: jnr-unixsocket - Unix sockets for Java
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912310
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Java:
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
Maven:
[x]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even
when building with ant
[x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used
[x]: Packages DOES NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-
utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
[x]: Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x]: Packages use %{_mavenpomdir} instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[?]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
[Bug 912310] Review Request: jnr-unixsocket - Unix sockets for Java
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912310 Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com --- Thanks for the review! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: jnr-unixsocket Short Description: Unix sockets for Java Owners: bkabrda Branches: InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=uNPAiqLAEaa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 910530] Review Request: kspaceduel - Space arcade game
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910530 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2013-02-19 09:42:28 --- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- imported -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LKLRImZ6Uba=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 910500] Review Request: kdiamond - A three-in-a-row game
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910500 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: kdiamond Short Description: A three-in-a-row game Owners: than rdieter jreznik kkofler ltinkl rnovacek Branches: f17 f18 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FrDY5MyALJa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 910535] Review Request: kubrick - Puzzle cube solving game
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910535 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2013-02-19 09:44:21 --- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- imported -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MCCajzUCmqa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 910536] Review Request: lskat - A fun and engaging card game
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910536 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2013-02-19 09:45:30 --- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- imported -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HZDmXtIktOa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878188] Review Request: qt5-qtbase - Qt5 - QtBase components
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878188 --- Comment #34 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- It's an optional feature, but enabling it only includes a qtchooser .conf file and should cause no harm either. If you want to keep things simpler for review purposes, I can disable it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=a2cxv8WfWGa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 886900] Review Request: arm-none-eabi-binutils-cs - GNU Binutils for cross-compilation for ARM target
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886900
Tomas Hozza tho...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Tomas Hozza tho...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.F2
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
Note: %defattr present but not needed
- Not an issue!
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[-]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must
be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
- With some exceptions because this is a cross-compiler package.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: CheckResultdir
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
--requires).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
[!]: SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}.
Note: Source0 (binutils-2012.09-63.tar.bz2) Source1 (README.fedora)
- Not an issue. Source0 is just a part of upstream tarball. It is
[Bug 886900] Review Request: arm-none-eabi-binutils-cs - GNU Binutils for cross-compilation for ARM target
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886900 Michal Hlavinka mhlav...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Michal Hlavinka mhlav...@redhat.com --- Thanks for the review. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: arm-none-eabi-binutils-cs Short Description: GNU Binutils for cross-compilation for arm-none-eabi target Owners: mhlavink Branches: f17 f18 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=SHRWDDpFf8a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 893165] Review Request: mod_qos - Quality of service module for Apache
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893165 Adam Miller admil...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|admil...@redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Adam Miller admil...@redhat.com --- Looks good, rpmlint throws this but I don't consider it a blocker. $ rpmlint srpm/mod_qos.spec srpm/mod_qos.spec:17: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 4, tab: line 17) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. PASSED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=rcYLLyGY21a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 907583] Review Request: python-sanction - A simple, lightweight OAuth2 client
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907583 --- Comment #4 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com --- Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=At182Mx3vqa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 907583] Review Request: python-sanction - A simple, lightweight OAuth2 client
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907583 Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-sanction Short Description: A simple, lightweight OAuth2 client Owners: ralph Branches: f18 f17 el6 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HvhSaSSH1ga=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 912816] New: Review Request: kyua-testers - Scriptable tester interfaces
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912816 Bug ID: 912816 Summary: Review Request: kyua-testers - Scriptable tester interfaces Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: julio+red...@meroh.net Spec URL: http://www.NetBSD.org/~jmmv/kyua-testers.spec SRPM URL: http://www.NetBSD.org/~jmmv/kyua-testers-0.1-1.fc18.src.rpm This will be necessary for the update of kyua-cli to 0.6 that is forthcoming. Description: Kyua (pronounced Q.A.) is a testing framework for both developers and users. Kyua is different from most other testing frameworks in that it puts the end user experience before anything else. There are multiple reasons for users to run the tests themselves, and Kyua ensures that they can do so in the most convenient way. This module, kyua-testers, provides scriptable interfaces to interact with test programs of various kinds. The interface of such testers allows the caller to execute a single test case of a single test program in a controlled and homogeneous manner. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=35idMVURc5a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 839091] Review Request: kyua-atf-compat - ATF compatibility tools
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839091 Julio Merino julio+red...@meroh.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||michel+...@sylvestre.me --- Comment #2 from Julio Merino julio+red...@meroh.net --- Michel: I now realize I never CCd you on this. You may be interested :-P Thanks in advance! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=rJ5xe1xifCa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 886900] Review Request: arm-none-eabi-binutils-cs - GNU Binutils for cross-compilation for ARM target
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886900 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=VXKgiB7AYea=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 907583] Review Request: python-sanction - A simple, lightweight OAuth2 client
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907583 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=KxUNDNUFA3a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 910500] Review Request: kdiamond - A three-in-a-row game
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910500 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=OoTv42bS9za=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 912310] Review Request: jnr-unixsocket - Unix sockets for Java
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912310 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=M0g9BUa1XFa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 910565] Review Request: python-github - A Python library implementing the full Github API v3.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910565
Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a.bad...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com ---
I started packaging this last night before finding this. Some comments from
that attempt:
* Package appears to be LGPLv3+, not GPLv2+ (see the comment headers of the
source files, for instance GitObject.py)
* License files and other docs are in the github directory and should be moved
out to %doc. As Richard Marko points out, you can do this with mv. But
there's more than just the github/doc directory: COPYING, COPYING.LESSER, and
ReadMe.md
* Need to run the tests during the build:
%check
%{__python} setup.py test
* Should exclude the tests from the binary package (I grepped for tests and
import in the source to determine that they weren't needed at runtime):
%files
[...]
%exclude %{python_sitelib}/github/tests
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hcdz5fer3Za=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 912821] New: Review Request: arm-none-eabi-gcc-cs - GNU GCC for cross-compilation for arm-none-eabi target
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912821
Bug ID: 912821
Summary: Review Request: arm-none-eabi-gcc-cs - GNU GCC for
cross-compilation for arm-none-eabi target
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Reporter: mhlav...@redhat.com
Spec URL: http://mihlit.cz/smetiste/arm-none-eabi-gcc-cs.spec
SRPM URL:
http://mihlit.cz/smetiste/arm-none-eabi-gcc-cs-2012.09.63-1.fc18.src.rpm
Description:
This package contains the Cross Compiling version of g++, which can be used to
compile c++ code for the %{target} platform, instead of for the native %{_arch}
platform.
This package is based on the CodeSourcery %{cs_date}-%{cs_rel} release, which
includes improved ARM target support compared to the corresponding GNU GCC
release.
Fedora Account System Username: mhlavink
Note: This is targeted for bare-metal arm development (st's STM32, atmel's
SAM and similar microcontrollers - like avr). For linux on arm, there is
cross-{binutils,gcc}-arm. This is not the same.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=lB4g3XHBuaa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 912821] Review Request: arm-none-eabi-gcc-cs - GNU GCC for cross-compilation for arm-none-eabi target
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912821 Michal Hlavinka mhlav...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|tho...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=cKkORYOWdQa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 912833] New: Review Request: php-channel-dropbox-php - Adds the Dropbox-PHP channel to PEAR
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912833 Bug ID: 912833 Summary: Review Request: php-channel-dropbox-php - Adds the Dropbox-PHP channel to PEAR Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: gre...@freenet.de Spec URL: http://brummbq.fedorapeople.org/php-channel-dropbox-php.spec SRPM URL: http://brummbq.fedorapeople.org/php-channel-dropbox-php-1.3-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: This package adds the Dropbox-PHP channel which allows PEAR packages from this channel to be installed. Fedora Account System Username: brummbq -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=04O7iKOPgqa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 912834] New: Review Request: php-pear-Dropbox - Library for integrating dropbox with PHP
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912834 Bug ID: 912834 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Dropbox - Library for integrating dropbox with PHP Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: gre...@freenet.de Spec URL: http://brummbq.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-Dropbox.spec SRPM URL: http://brummbq.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-Dropbox-1.0.0-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: This PHP library allows you to easily integrate dropbox with PHP. The library makes use of OAuth. Fedora Account System Username: brummbq -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=y44YrpCsqTa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 907583] Review Request: python-sanction - A simple, lightweight OAuth2 client
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907583 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=jO4gfpSPCEa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 907583] Review Request: python-sanction - A simple, lightweight OAuth2 client
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907583 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-sanction-0.1.4-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-sanction-0.1.4-1.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=yfGkNU1nwna=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 907583] Review Request: python-sanction - A simple, lightweight OAuth2 client
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907583 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-sanction-0.1.4-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-sanction-0.1.4-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=BbgfdYVhtZa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 907583] Review Request: python-sanction - A simple, lightweight OAuth2 client
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907583 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-sanction-0.1.4-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-sanction-0.1.4-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=VB628wLgGAa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 910502] Review Request: kgoldrunner - A game of action and puzzle solving
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910502 nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||alekc...@googlemail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|alekc...@googlemail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=AO9rjyVbaea=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 910502] Review Request: kgoldrunner - A game of action and puzzle solving
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910502
nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com ---
MUST Items:
+ rpmlint output
$ rpmlint kgoldrunner-4.10.0-1.fc18.i686.rpm
kgoldrunner-debuginfo-4.10.0-1.fc18.i686.rpm kgoldrunner-4.10.0-2.fc18.src.rpm
kgoldrunner.spec
kgoldrunner.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary kgoldrunner
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
+ named and versioned according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
Package name match the upstream tarball name kgoldrunner-4.10.0.tar.xz
+ spec file name kgoldrunner.spec matches base package name
+ complies with all the legal guidelines:
+ License: GPLv2+ and GFDL, matches actual license
+ No known patent problems
+ No emulator, no firmware, no binary-only or prebuilt components
+ COPYING (GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE Version 2), COPYING.DOC (GNU Free
Documentation License Version 1.2) packaged as %doc
+ source matches upstream:
MD5: 56d562956f1eaa54745f176594d5586a kgoldrunner-4.10.0.tar.xz
SHA1: 87ba1974279e7785beeeaeb776e3d12d1ee5abdf kgoldrunner-4.10.0.tar.xz
SHA256: 194a50cb7d8376d22a2bb35806a2d804cbe6c4dc4e9b15ecce2730315242104e
kgoldrunner-4.10.0.tar.xz
+ builds on at least one arch
build from mock is in F18 kde-unstable repo
+ no known non-working arches, so no ExcludeArch needed
+ no missing BuildRequires (builds in mock)
+ locales are handled properly by using %find_lang %{name} --with-kde macro
+ ldconfig call not needed (no shared libraries)
+ no duplicated system libraries
+ package not relocatable (no Prefix tag)
+ directory ownership correct (doesn't own directories owned by another
package, owns all package-specific directories %{_kde4_appsdir}/%{name}/)
+ no duplicate files in %files
+ permissions correct, %defattr(-,root,root,-) not needed now, executables have
executable permissions
+ macros used where possible (%{name}, %{version}, %{buildroot},
%{_target_platform}, %{cmake_kde4}, %{_kde4_datadir}, %{_kde4_bindir},
%{_kde4_iconsdir},%{_kde4_appsdir},%{_kde4_configdir})
+ non-code content: only permitted content, gamedata, themes under license that
matches the code
+ no large documentation files, so no -doc package needed
+ no %doc files required at runtime
+ no header files, no -devel package needed
+ no static libraries, so no -static package needed
+ no devel symlinks which would need to be in a -devel subpackage
+ devel packages must require the base package (no -devel package)
+ no .la files
+ kgoldrunner.desktop file for the GUI app kgoldrunner present
+ desktop-file-validate is used in %check and the kgoldrunner.desktop file
passes validation
+ all filenames are valid UTF-8
+ other packaging guidelines:
+ complies with the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard (all files in
%{_kde4_datadir}, %{_kde4_bindir},
%{_kde4_iconsdir},%{_kde4_appsdir},%{_kde4_configdir})
+ proper changelog, tags, BuildRequires, Summary, Description (got from
kgoldrunner's documentation)
+ no non-UTF-8 characters
+ all relevant documentation included as %doc (COPYING, COPYING.DOC, README)
+ RPM_OPT_FLAGS are used in %{cmake_kde4} macro
+ debuginfo package is valid (contains stripped symbols from ELF binary and
source code related to it)
+ no rpaths (no check-rpaths error)
+ no configuration files, so %config guideline doesn't apply
+ no init scripts, so init script guideline doesn't apply
+ timestamps are preserved
+ %{?_smp_mflags} used
+ not a web application, so web application guideline doesn't apply
+ no conflicts (kdegames-4.10.0 is metapackage now which not includes apps)
SHOULD Items:
+ license already included upstream
+ no translations for description and summary provided by upstream
+ package builds in mock (built for kde-unstable)
- successfully tested the package functionality (no testing yet)
+ scriptlets are sane (updating hicolor icon chache in %post, %postun,
%posttrans)
+ subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully
versioned dependency (no subpackages)
+ no .pc files, so placement of .pc files is irrelevant
+ no file dependencies
- package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts
APPROVED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=TM32EbPLpCa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 905681] Review Request: ultimaker-marlin-firmware - Ultimaker firmware for the 3D printer
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905681 Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ultimaker-marlin-firmware Short Description: Ultimaker firmware for the 3D printer Owners: churchyard patches Branches: f17 f18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qjPwtF9htfa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 876405] Review Request: perl-Module-Build-WithXSpp - XS++ enhanced flavor of Module::Build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876405 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Module-Build-WithXSpp-0.12-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Module-Build-WithXSpp-0.12-3.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PON1vgkgXHa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 910502] Review Request: kgoldrunner - A game of action and puzzle solving
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910502 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: kgoldrunner Short Description: A game of action and puzzle solving Owners: than rdieter jreznik kkofler ltinkl rnovacek Branches: f17 f18 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=En3YCKx3gka=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 905681] Review Request: ultimaker-marlin-firmware - Ultimaker firmware for the 3D printer
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905681 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gLGrKqb7fKa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 910504] Review Request: kigo - An implementation of the popular Go game
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910504
nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||alekc...@googlemail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|alekc...@googlemail.com
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com ---
Summary from desktop file:
Summary: Go Board Game
Code under GPLv2 or GPLv3 license, docs under GFDL.
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of
the License or (at your option) version 3 or any later version
accepted by the membership of KDE e.V. (or its successor approved
by the membership of KDE e.V.), which shall act as a proxy
defined in Section 14 of version 3 of the license.
# KDE e.V. may determine that future GPL versions are accepted
License: (GPLv2 or GPLv3) and GFDL
COPYING.DOC should be added in %doc.
%description from documentation:
Go is a strategic board game for two players. It is also known as
igo (Japanese), weiqi or wei ch'i (Chinese) or baduk (Korean).
Go is noted for being rich in strategic complexity despite its
simple rules.
The game is played by two players who alternately place black and
white stones (playing pieces, now usually made of glass or plastic)
on the vacant intersections of a grid of 19×19 lines (9x9 or 13x13
lines for easier flavors).
Requires: gnugo
should be:
Requires: gnugo%{?_isa}
rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint kigo-4.10.0-2.fc18.i686.rpm kigo-debuginfo-4.10.0-2.fc18.i686.rpm
kigo-4.10.0-2.fc18.src.rpm kigo.spec
kigo.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary kigo
kigo.src:73: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
kigo.spec:73: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
Commented line should be removed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pWyGivesqIa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 910502] Review Request: kgoldrunner - A game of action and puzzle solving
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910502 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=BtBx7FtHjRa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 910504] Review Request: kigo - An implementation of the popular Go game
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910504
--- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org ---
Requires: gnugo
should be:
Requires: gnugo%{?_isa}
No, why? It just invokes the binary, so why should there be a need to ISA-lock
the dependency?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=wDWA0svVX9a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 910504] Review Request: kigo - An implementation of the popular Go game
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910504 --- Comment #3 from nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com --- I think according to this https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#Requires -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=aNRSGupFAma=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 910504] Review Request: kigo - An implementation of the popular Go game
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910504 --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- I agree with kevin, we shouldn't need to worry about multilib'ness of gnugo dep. Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kdegames/kigo.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kdegames/kigo-4.10.0-3.fc18.src.rpm %changelog * Tue Feb 19 2013 Rex Dieter rdie...@fedoraproject.org 4.10.0-3 - update license, summary, description -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=3QeLMqEPD1a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 884855] Review Request: python-webtest1.3 - Helper to test WSGI applications
Product: Fedora EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884855 Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|tdaba...@redhat.com | Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-02-19 16:19:45 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=h1GRiqHrcga=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 891992] Review Request: python-xmltodict - Makes working with XML feel like you are working with JSON
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891992 Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-02-19 16:21:31 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ciKBfqbU1Va=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 883478] Review Request: python-logging-tree - Introspect and display the logger tree inside logging
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883478 Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Last Closed||2013-02-19 16:21:54 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=BbgVC7P8rea=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 910502] Review Request: kgoldrunner - A game of action and puzzle solving
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910502 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2013-02-19 16:22:10 --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- imported -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=iPDMPS81S0a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 910504] Review Request: kigo - An implementation of the popular Go game
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910504 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org --- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#Requires That only says HOW to make the dep arch-specific, it doesn't say WHEN to do it, and here it doesn't make sense. :-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=jjp0uvFJyka=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 885211] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy-traversal - A pyramid extension for traversal with SQLAlchemy objects
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885211 Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-02-19 16:22:44 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ifJe8AGp6wa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 886164] Review Request: python-dogpile-cache - A caching front-end based on the Dogpile lock.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886164 Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-02-19 16:23:02 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=A92myPN7pja=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 886221] Review Request: python-dogpile-core - A 'dogpile' lock, typically used as a component of a larger caching solution
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886221 Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-02-19 16:23:12 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=VqIWmYDRzua=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 886164] Review Request: python-dogpile-cache - A caching front-end based on the Dogpile lock.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886164 Bug 886164 depends on bug 886221, which changed state. Bug 886221 Summary: Review Request: python-dogpile-core - A 'dogpile' lock, typically used as a component of a larger caching solution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886221 What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=N7qgYYoonva=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 908049] Review Request: python-django-longerusername - Make django auth.user username field longer
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908049 --- Comment #10 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com --- EL6 push still required -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=UG0i2E1fEQa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 875893] Review Request: python-cloud-sptheme - A nice sphinx theme named 'Cloud', and some related extensions
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875893 Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-02-19 16:24:52 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=y4xT2ZpITPa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 876399] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-Typemaps-Default - Set of useful typemaps
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876399 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-ExtUtils-Typemaps-Default-1.01-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-ExtUtils-Typemaps-Default-1.01-3.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hVxuutSCtVa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 905681] Review Request: ultimaker-marlin-firmware - Ultimaker firmware for the 3D printer
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905681 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=9gi5xdre7ca=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 905681] Review Request: ultimaker-marlin-firmware - Ultimaker firmware for the 3D printer
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905681 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ultimaker-marlin-firmware-12.12-0.3.RC1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ultimaker-marlin-firmware-12.12-0.3.RC1.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7TntmC6gpNa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 905681] Review Request: ultimaker-marlin-firmware - Ultimaker firmware for the 3D printer
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905681 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ultimaker-marlin-firmware-12.12-0.3.RC1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ultimaker-marlin-firmware-12.12-0.3.RC1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=IETceIxi2Fa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 910504] Review Request: kigo - An implementation of the popular Go game
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910504
nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com ---
MUST Items:
+ rpmlint output
$ rpmlint kigo-4.10.0-2.fc18.i686.rpm kigo-debuginfo-4.10.0-2.fc18.i686.rpm
kigo-4.10.0-3.fc18.src.rpm kigo.spec
kigo.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary kigo
kigo.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US igo - go, ego, ago
kigo.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US weiqi - Wei
kigo.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US wei - weigh, Wei, we
kigo.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ch'i - chi, Ch'in
kigo.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US baduk - bad
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.
+ named and versioned according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
Package name match the upstream tarball name kigo-4.10.0.tar.xz
+ spec file name kigo.spec matches base package name
+ complies with all the legal guidelines:
+ License: (GPLv2 or GPLv3) and GFDL, matches actual license
+ No known patent problems
+ No emulator, no firmware, no binary-only or prebuilt components
+ COPYING (GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE Version 2), COPYING.DOC (GNU Free
Documentation License Version 1.2) packaged as %doc
+ source matches upstream:
MD5: 1b705678bc7f5ae883e23fa42563767d kigo-4.10.0.tar.xz
SHA1: 0dcee4587b9c57847bf8c2c7e0d2450c386aa969 kigo-4.10.0.tar.xz
SHA256: c7436c465bd987227dd5b2cbf1102ed6b86cbdaae61d4c9ec576ea2f2bc1183e
kigo-4.10.0.tar.xz
+ builds on at least one arch
build from mock is in F18 kde-unstable repo
+ no known non-working arches, so no ExcludeArch needed
+ no missing BuildRequires (builds in mock)
+ locales are handled properly by using %find_lang %{name} --with-kde macro
+ ldconfig call not needed (no shared libraries)
+ no duplicated system libraries
+ package not relocatable (no Prefix tag)
+ directory ownership correct (doesn't own directories owned by another
package, owns all package-specific directories %{_kde4_appsdir}/%{name}/)
+ no duplicate files in %files
+ permissions correct, %defattr(-,root,root,-) not needed now, executables have
executable permissions
+ macros used where possible (%{name}, %{version}, %{buildroot},
%{_target_platform}, %{cmake_kde4}, %{_kde4_datadir}, %{_kde4_bindir},
%{_kde4_iconsdir},%{_kde4_appsdir},%{_kde4_configdir})
+ non-code content: only permitted content, gamedata, themes under license that
matches the code
+ no large documentation files, so no -doc package needed
+ no %doc files required at runtime
+ no header files, no -devel package needed
+ no static libraries, so no -static package needed
+ no devel symlinks which would need to be in a -devel subpackage
+ devel packages must require the base package (no -devel package)
+ no .la files
+ kigo.desktop file for the GUI app kigo present
+ desktop-file-validate is used in %check and the kigo.desktop file passes
validation
+ all filenames are valid UTF-8
+ other packaging guidelines:
+ complies with the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard (all files in
%{_kde4_datadir}, %{_kde4_bindir},
%{_kde4_iconsdir},%{_kde4_appsdir},%{_kde4_configdir})
+ proper changelog, tags, BuildRequires, Summary, Description (got from
kigo's documentation)
+ no non-UTF-8 characters
+ all relevant documentation included as %doc (COPYING, COPYING.DOC, README,
AUTHORS)
+ RPM_OPT_FLAGS are used in %{cmake_kde4} macro
+ debuginfo package is valid (contains stripped symbols from ELF binary and
source code related to it)
+ no rpaths (no check-rpaths error)
+ no configuration files, so %config guideline doesn't apply
+ no init scripts, so init script guideline doesn't apply
+ timestamps are preserved
+ %{?_smp_mflags} used
+ not a web application, so web application guideline doesn't apply
+ no conflicts (kdegames-4.10.0 is metapackage now which not includes apps)
SHOULD Items:
+ license already included upstream
+ no translations for description and summary provided by upstream
+ package builds in mock (built for kde-unstable)
- successfully tested the package functionality (no testing yet)
+ scriptlets are sane (updating hicolor icon chache in %post, %postun,
%posttrans)
+ subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully
versioned dependency (no subpackages)
+ no .pc files, so placement of .pc files is irrelevant
+ no file dependencies
- package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts
APPROVED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LXwQxR2auka=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
[Bug 910504] Review Request: kigo - An implementation of the popular Go game
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910504 --- Comment #7 from nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com --- Edit summary in Review Request. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vmbhY6l31ia=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 912878] New: Review Request: profile-sync-daemon - psd
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912878 Bug ID: 912878 Summary: Review Request: profile-sync-daemon - psd Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Reporter: gray...@archlinux.us Spec URL: http://repo-ck.com/fedora_rpms/profile-sync-daemon.spec SRPM URL: http://repo-ck.com/fedora_rpms/profile-sync-daemon-5.24-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: Symlinks and syncs browser profiles to RAM via tmpfs which will reduce HDD/SDD calls and speed-up browsers. Fedora Account System Username: graysky Comment: This is my first package, and I am seeking a sponsor. I am the upsteam dev of this software and have packaged it for: Arch Linux, Gentoo, and Ubuntu. I would like to extend that to include fc18 as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Xqk6BJB377a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 903380] Review Request: libint2 - A library for efficient evaluation of electron repulsion integrals
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903380 --- Comment #3 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net --- Why are you using Mercurial snapshot instead of released tarball? http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/libint/libint-for-mpqc/libint-2.0.0-stable.tgz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=S4EUZHpYxaa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 903380] Review Request: libint2 - A library for efficient evaluation of electron repulsion integrals
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903380 --- Comment #4 from Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi --- (In reply to comment #3) Why are you using Mercurial snapshot instead of released tarball? http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/libint/libint-for-mpqc/libint-2.0.0- stable.tgz It's because that one is not the compiler, it's a generated source code tarball. The compiler doesn't have tarball releases. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=S1E4NPreOga=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 910504] Review Request: kigo - Go Board game
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910504 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: kigo - An |Review Request: kigo - Go |implementation of the |Board game |popular Go game | Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: kigo Short Description: Go Board game Owners: than rdieter jreznik kkofler ltinkl rnovacek Branches: f17 f18 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5YHj2srvCta=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 868578] Review Request: re2 - C++ fast alternative to backtracking RE engines
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868578 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=rCeBwV3PETa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 868578] Review Request: re2 - C++ fast alternative to backtracking RE engines
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868578 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- re2-20130115-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/re2-20130115-2.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=87eJ27Giyaa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 868578] Review Request: re2 - C++ fast alternative to backtracking RE engines
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868578 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- re2-20130115-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/re2-20130115-2.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=VHiyigx9hta=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 868578] Review Request: re2 - C++ fast alternative to backtracking RE engines
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868578 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- re2-20130115-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/re2-20130115-2.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vGQnsnhkbya=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 868578] Review Request: re2 - C++ fast alternative to backtracking RE engines
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868578 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- re2-20130115-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/re2-20130115-2.el5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5g5w6RrDTSa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 908168] Review Request: openprops - A fork of java.util.Properties from OpenJDK
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908168 Patrick Huang pahu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Patrick Huang pahu...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: openprops Short Description: An improved java.util.Properties from OpenJDK Owners: pahuang seanf Branches: f17 f18 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=aqLLIyBfUda=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 912833] Review Request: php-channel-dropbox-php - Adds the Dropbox-PHP channel to PEAR
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912833 Joseph Marrero jmarr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jmarr...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Kh8wkRMBvfa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 912930] Review Request : icaro - Robotic Educational Project
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912930 Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) CC||g...@xofica.cl --- Comment #1 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com --- *** Bug 750898 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ObGMGlRFHfa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 750898] Review Request: icaro - A robot automation language
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750898 Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED CC||echevemas...@gmail.com Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed||2013-02-19 21:30:44 --- Comment #8 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 912930 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=E4GnO0EYJ0a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 912930] Review Request : icaro - Robotic Educational Project
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912930 Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CUUhkLr6VRa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 912834] Review Request: php-pear-Dropbox - Library for integrating dropbox with PHP
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912834 Joseph Marrero jmarr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jmarr...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gx8sLXPAEOa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 912930] New: Review Request : icaro - Robotic Educational Project
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912930 Bug ID: 912930 Summary: Review Request : icaro - Robotic Educational Project Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Reporter: echevemas...@gmail.com Spec URL: http://echevemaster.fedorapeople.org/icaro_final/icaro.spec SRPMS URL: http://echevemaster.fedorapeople.org/icaro_final/icaro-1.0-2.fc18.src.rpm Description: An educational robotic software aimed to develop robotic and programming fundamentals. Fedora Account System Username: echevemaster Tested on koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5034767 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HHLIpCghiPa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 911911] Review Request: perl-Import-Into - Import packages into other packages
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911911 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=SeROVz2rsga=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 911911] Review Request: perl-Import-Into - Import packages into other packages
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911911 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Import-Into-1.001000-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=DpMMtCtY8Ra=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 906764] Review Request: manaplus - OpenSource 2D MMORPG client for Evol Online and The Mana World
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906764 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2013-02-19 22:54:43 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=juMCCFPpZ6a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 906764] Review Request: manaplus - OpenSource 2D MMORPG client for Evol Online and The Mana World
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906764 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- manaplus-1.3.2.3-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=dNLtFcf2koa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 885349] Review Request: ghc-wai-logger - A logging system for WAI
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885349 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ghc-wai-logger-0.1.4-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=JuMFZq0M6Ca=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 906764] Review Request: manaplus - OpenSource 2D MMORPG client for Evol Online and The Mana World
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906764 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- manaplus-1.3.2.3-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=tUjf2gq8N0a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
