[Bug 924513] Review Request: zanata-api - Zanata API modules
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924513 --- Comment #10 from Patrick Huang pahu...@redhat.com --- Fixed. f18 build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5291496 f19 build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5291479 Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pahuang/zanata-api.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pahuang/zanata-api-2.2.0-6.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=exP2sN0jb5a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948082] Rename Request: nodejs-cookie-jar - A cookie handling and cookie jar library for Node.js
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948082 --- Comment #6 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com --- Spec: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/npm/nodejs-cookie-jar.spec SRPM: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/npm/nodejs-cookie-jar-0.2.0-5.fc19.src.rpm * Tue Apr 23 2013 T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com - 1:0.2.0-5 - run tests -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hPpvkFtpKWa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894724] Review Request: nodejs-tap - A Test Anything Protocol library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894724 --- Comment #9 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com --- Sorry for the delay. All tests pass now. The one that was failing has been fixed in a patch and reported upstream: https://github.com/isaacs/node-tap/pull/75 I also updated this to the latest upstream. Spec: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/npm/nodejs-tap.spec SRPM: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/npm/nodejs-tap-0.4.1-1.fc19.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID * Tue Apr 23 2013 T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com - 0.4.1-1 - new upstream release 0.4.1 - fix tests -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6W9lCj6WsHa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894724] Review Request: nodejs-tap - A Test Anything Protocol library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894724 --- Comment #10 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com --- Sorry, there was a copy/paste error in the Koji scratch build. The correct URL is: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5291633 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CbVZtgpBLSa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 952093] Review Request: python-wtf-peewee - WTForms integration for peewee models
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952093 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-wtf-peewee-0.2.1-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-wtf-peewee-0.2.1-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=J9bBzqEaeva=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 952093] Review Request: python-wtf-peewee - WTForms integration for peewee models
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952093 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=aDRfbWiu08a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 924513] Review Request: zanata-api - Zanata API modules
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924513
Ding-Yi Chen dc...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #11 from Ding-Yi Chen dc...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[X]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[X]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[X]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[X]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[X]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[X]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[X]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[X]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in zanata-api-
javadoc
[X]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[X]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
LGPL (v2.1 or later), Unknown or generated, *No copyright* LGPL
(v2.1 or later). 3 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/dchen/zanata-api/licensecheck.txt
[-]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[X]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[X]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[X]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[X]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[X]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[X]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[X]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
Java:
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[x]: Javadoc subpackages have Requires: jpackage-utils
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
Maven:
[X]: Pom files have correct add_maven_depmap call
Note: Some add_maven_depmap calls found. Please check if they are correct
[X]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even
when building with ant
[x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used
[x]: Packages DOES NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-
utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
[x]: Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x]: Packages use %{_mavenpomdir} instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[X]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[X]: Package functions as described.
[X]: Latest version is packaged.
[X]: Package does
[Bug 924513] Review Request: zanata-api - Zanata API modules
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924513 Ding-Yi Chen dc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|dc...@redhat.com|pahu...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=P0x4KhHDiEa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948082] Rename Request: nodejs-cookie-jar - A cookie handling and cookie jar library for Node.js
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948082 --- Comment #7 from Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu --- Did you actually upload those files? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=WdvouTwwGta=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 917365] Review Request: ibus-bogo - Vietnamese engine for IBus input platform
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=917365
Daiki Ueno du...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #8 from Daiki Ueno du...@redhat.com ---
Well, mock build still fails with:
/bin/sh: pyside-lupdate: command not found
make[2]: *** [config-gui/CMakeFiles/translations] Error 127
But I could work around this by installing pyside-tools.
Here is the review. Summary:
* ibus-bogo-settings does not start under F18, with errors like:
SyntaxError: Non-ASCII character '\xe1' in file
(perhaps it depends on locale settings)
* Good to borrow the snippet for generating icon cache:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache
* Good to preserve timestamps of installed files with:
make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL=install -p
* Does it include any arch-dependent files? If not, it can be BuildArch:
noarch.
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in
the spec URL.
Note: Upstream MD5sum check error, diff is in /home/ueno/Downloads/review-
ibus-bogo/diff.txt
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL
- update-desktop-database is invoked when required
Note: desktop file(s) in ibus-bogo
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache
- gtk-update-icon-cache is invoked when required
Note: icons in ibus-bogo
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
GPL (v3 or later), Unknown or generated. 2 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/ueno/Downloads/review-
ibus-bogo/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
Note: Documentation size is 51200 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install if there is
such a file.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv,
[Bug 877651] Review Request: sagemath - A free open-source mathematics software system
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877651 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=GWx04c2ta0a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 877651] Review Request: sagemath - A free open-source mathematics software system
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877651 --- Comment #79 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- sagemath-5.8-6.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sagemath-5.8-6.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=UU7bgPVOS0a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 877651] Review Request: sagemath - A free open-source mathematics software system
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877651 --- Comment #80 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- sagemath-5.8-6.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sagemath-5.8-6.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=OdsFEJ8LSfa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 891232] nodejs-ronn - markdown to roff/html converter
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891232 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=DAN7ecKXwHa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 891232] nodejs-ronn - markdown to roff/html converter
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891232 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-ronn-0.4.0-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-ronn-0.4.0-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gAr4cM50GQa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 891232] nodejs-ronn - markdown to roff/html converter
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891232 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-ronn-0.4.0-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-ronn-0.4.0-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=p4rCyFsPs6a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 891232] nodejs-ronn - markdown to roff/html converter
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891232 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-ronn-0.4.0-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-ronn-0.4.0-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2ZGlyiHbCta=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948082] Rename Request: nodejs-cookie-jar - A cookie handling and cookie jar library for Node.js
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948082 --- Comment #8 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com --- Sorry, try it now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=TcDTb1vaIua=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894724] Review Request: nodejs-tap - A Test Anything Protocol library
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894724
--- Comment #11 from Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
I wonder if nodejs-tap or just tap is the correct name here?
- Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified.
- Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Need to make sure you use the version of the spec which has
the link to the bug as the spec in the srpm differed from the
separate spec on this.
- Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
nodejs-tap.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/node_modules/tap/bin/tap-http.js 0644L /usr/bin/env
nodejs-tap.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary tap
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[-]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
Note: %defattr present but not needed
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
Unknown or generated. 1 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/tom/894724-nodejs-tap/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[!]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 10 files.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: Buildroot is not present
Note: Buildroot: present but not needed
[-]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: %clean present but not required
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[!]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if
[Bug 948082] Rename Request: nodejs-cookie-jar - A cookie handling and cookie jar library for Node.js
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948082 Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu --- Great. Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6gqz6yU3Sya=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894724] Review Request: nodejs-tap - A Test Anything Protocol library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894724 --- Comment #12 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #11) Issues: === - Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. I wonder if nodejs-tap or just tap is the correct name here? Earlier on we decided to rename because there are multiple implementations of the Test Anything Protocol (TAP). (The Perl version is probably more widely used. ;-) - Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. - Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Need to make sure you use the version of the spec which has the link to the bug as the spec in the srpm differed from the separate spec on this. Sorry, forgot to rebuild after I added the upstream pull request link. - Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. nodejs-tap.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/node_modules/tap/bin/tap-http.js 0644L /usr/bin/env Fixed. nodejs-tap.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary tap This is in my queue of man pages to write. --- Spec: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/npm/nodejs-tap.spec SRPM: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/npm/nodejs-tap-0.4.1-2.fc19.src.rpm * Tue Apr 23 2013 T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com - 0.4.1-2 - fix rpmlint warnings -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=D6ZvEmmuSoa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 901452] Review Request: nodejs-dryice - A CommonJS/RequireJS packaging tool for browser scripts
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901452 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Cvw2SKqQ7Ya=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 901452] Review Request: nodejs-dryice - A CommonJS/RequireJS packaging tool for browser scripts
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901452 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-dryice-0.4.10-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-dryice-0.4.10-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YDgzLiDHuBa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894724] Review Request: nodejs-tap - A Test Anything Protocol library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894724 Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu --- (In reply to comment #12) (In reply to comment #11) Issues: === - Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. I wonder if nodejs-tap or just tap is the correct name here? Earlier on we decided to rename because there are multiple implementations of the Test Anything Protocol (TAP). (The Perl version is probably more widely used. ;-) Yes I realised that might be an issue, and that it was a close call. Of course it just means the fight may move to the rights to /usr/bin/tap and /etc/rpm/macros.tap but we can deal with that if it ever happens. So I think we can say package is approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=08p5RneppWa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 901452] Review Request: nodejs-dryice - A CommonJS/RequireJS packaging tool for browser scripts
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901452 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-dryice-0.4.10-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-dryice-0.4.10-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8Jpek6KdRea=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948082] Rename Request: nodejs-cookie-jar - A cookie handling and cookie jar library for Node.js
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948082 T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: nodejs-cookie-jar Short Description: A cookie handling and cookie jar library for Node.js Owners: patched Branches: f19 f18 el6 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8DlbU2ismja=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948082] Rename Request: nodejs-cookie-jar - A cookie handling and cookie jar library for Node.js
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948082 --- Comment #11 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com --- Sorry, typoed the username. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: nodejs-cookie-jar Short Description: A cookie handling and cookie jar library for Node.js Owners: patches Branches: f19 f18 el6 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ZayOOeHC4Ja=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894724] Review Request: nodejs-tap - A Test Anything Protocol library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894724 T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com --- Luckily, Perl doesn't use /usr/bin/tap so it isn't a problem for now. This is also one of the reasons I created a %tap macro, so we don't have to change specs if the binary moves later on. Thanks for the review! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: nodejs-tap Short Description: A Test Anything Protocol library Owners: patches Branches: f19 f18 el6 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4F77V9PIU3a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894724] Review Request: nodejs-tap - A Test Anything Protocol library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894724 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=t5fswVFOjfa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894724] Review Request: nodejs-tap - A Test Anything Protocol library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894724 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-dryice-0.4.10-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-dryice-0.4.10-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=GfGHwGGIP1a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 901452] Review Request: nodejs-dryice - A CommonJS/RequireJS packaging tool for browser scripts
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901452 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-dryice-0.4.10-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-dryice-0.4.10-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=TU4JfNnWK8a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894724] Review Request: nodejs-tap - A Test Anything Protocol library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894724 T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vIN74pzNkya=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 955551] New: Review Request: python-flask-admin - Simple and extensible admin interface framework for Flask
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=91 Bug ID: 91 Summary: Review Request: python-flask-admin - Simple and extensible admin interface framework for Flask Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mstuc...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Category: --- Spec URL: http://mstuchli.fedorapeople.org/python-flask-admin.spec SRPM URL: http://mstuchli.fedorapeople.org/python-flask-admin-1.0.5-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: Simple and extensible admin interface framework for Flask Fedora Account System Username: mstuchli -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=aKNVCDswxfa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 952632] Review Request: qtermwidget - Qt4 terminal widget
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952632
--- Comment #12 from Eugene A. Pivnev ti.eug...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #11)
you are missing the %{?_isa} macro and the %{release} macro in your string.
Sorry - _isa AND release? Or _isa only?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=N9TsIOXMlJa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 947049] Review Request: qxkb - Qt-based keyboard layout switcher
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947049 --- Comment #2 from Eugene A. Pivnev ti.eug...@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #1) As with qtermwidget you are allowing the use of O3 optimization: %cmake .. As in qtermwidget I simply remove any cmake flags. qxkb not set any -O flag itself. Problem started many packages ago: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=929256 I really don't know - what to do with this %cmake feature/bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=EIcE0lW9Cqa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 871203] Review Request: console-bridge - Lightweight set of macros used for reporting information in libraries
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871203 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) sanjay.an...@gmail.com --- Hi Rich, Issues are fixed: [ankur@ankur-pc SRPMS]$ rpm -qp --requires /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/*.rpm cmake boost-devel rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 /sbin/ldconfig /sbin/ldconfig libboost_system-mt.so.1.53.0()(64bit) libboost_thread-mt.so.1.53.0()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.11)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.9)(64bit) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) = 5.2-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) = 5.2-1 /usr/bin/pkg-config console-bridge(x86-64) = 0.1.4-2.fc20 libconsole_bridge.so.0()(64bit) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) = 5.2-1 [ankur@ankur-pc SRPMS]$ rpm -qp --provides /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/*.rpm console-bridge = 0.1.4-2.fc20 console-bridge(x86-64) = 0.1.4-2.fc20 libconsole_bridge.so.0()(64bit) console-bridge-debuginfo = 0.1.4-2.fc20 console-bridge-debuginfo(x86-64) = 0.1.4-2.fc20 console-bridge-devel = 0.1.4-2.fc20 console-bridge-devel(x86-64) = 0.1.4-2.fc20 pkgconfig(console_bridge) [ankur@ankur-pc SRPMS]$ Package looks good to me. XXX APPROVED XXX -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=DucP0Fuwm6a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 907027] Review Request: rapidxml - Fast XML parser
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907027 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=wJkuReKoEGa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 907027] Review Request: rapidxml - Fast XML parser
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907027 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- rapidxml-1.13-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rapidxml-1.13-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=J2UN7HugDwa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 907027] Review Request: rapidxml - Fast XML parser
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907027 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- rapidxml-1.13-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rapidxml-1.13-2.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=i4dcCGYCZfa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 907027] Review Request: rapidxml - Fast XML parser
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907027 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- rapidxml-1.13-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rapidxml-1.13-2.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MKMvpOlIOQa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 822328] Review Request: libmediainfo - Supplies technical and tag information about a video or audio file
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328 --- Comment #3 from Vasiliy Glazov vasc...@gmail.com --- Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/RussianFedora/libmediainfo/master/libmediainfo.spec SRPM URL: http://koji.russianfedora.ru/packages/libmediainfo/0.7.62/2.fc18.R/src/libmediainfo-0.7.62-2.fc18.R.src.rpm - Removed dos2unix from BR - Correcting encoding for all files - Corrected config and build -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=OCTKAa1wOFa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 822329] Review Request: libzen - Shared library for libmediainfo and medianfo
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822329 --- Comment #42 from Vasiliy Glazov vasc...@gmail.com --- Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/RussianFedora/libzen/master/libzen.spec SRPM URL: http://koji.russianfedora.ru/packages/libzen/0.4.28/7.fc18.R/src/libzen-0.4.28-7.fc18.R.src.rpm Increased version. Done the same changes for libmediainfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328 mediainfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822327 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=axRlqeNaIoa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 822327] Review Request: mediainfo - Supplies technical and tag information about a video or audio file
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822327 --- Comment #4 from Vasiliy Glazov vasc...@gmail.com --- Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/RussianFedora/mediainfo/master/mediainfo.spec SRPM URL: http://koji.russianfedora.ru/packages/mediainfo/0.7.62/2.fc18.R/src/mediainfo-0.7.62-2.fc18.R.src.rpm - Removed dos2unix from BR - Correcting encoding for all files - Corrected config and build -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5XZPtomSVga=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 953101] Review Request: razorqt - Lightweight desktop toolbox
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953101 --- Comment #15 from Eugene A. Pivnev ti.eug...@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #13) * Again, there are -O3 optimizations present in the build Seems that it is really %cmake macro bug/feature. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hkHsHQl9Kza=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 877039] Review Request: rubygem-turbolinks - Turbolinks makes following links in your web application faster
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877039 --- Comment #1 from Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com --- Updated regarding Ruby 2 [1] and to the latest version: SPEC: http://data-strzibny.rhcloud.com/rubygem-turbolinks.spec SRPM: http://data-strzibny.rhcloud.com/rubygem-turbolinks-1.1.1-1.fc20.src.rpm Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5292043 [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Ruby_2.0.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2PyAZlpEPEa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 953101] Review Request: razorqt - Lightweight desktop toolbox
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953101 --- Comment #16 from Eugene A. Pivnev ti.eug...@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #14) For sub-packages that package .qm help files you will need to use the %find_lang macro: I am to make some researches. Will be in next package release (-4). Also some issues in rpmlint that can be handled (should the metapackage be noarch? thus negating my previous comment) razorqt.x86_64: E: no-binary Setting main package (=== meta-packages) in noarch make all subpackages noarch too. Same error is in wine metapackage. razorqt-data.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Fixed - razorqt-data is noarch now and binaries removed. Note: that binaries was xdg-utils replacement. After hot discussion (https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/razor-qt/c_AFBYwJSM8) I desided to remove these utils from package. This means that razorqt will be ok in Fedora17+, but _can_ be not fine in EL6 (without fresh xdg-utils). Spec URL: http://tieugene.fedorapeople.org/rpms/razorqt/razorqt.spec SRPM URL: http://tieugene.fedorapeople.org/rpms/razorqt/razorqt-0.5.2-3.fc18.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=iExIV4oYyya=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 953101] Review Request: razorqt - Lightweight desktop toolbox
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953101 --- Comment #17 from Eugene A. Pivnev ti.eug...@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #14) For sub-packages that package .qm help files you will need to use the %find_lang macro: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/ Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files Sorry - You _can_ then use that file to include all of the locales. All qms in all subpackages are installing with make_install to proper folders and I need no to do something special with them. IMO. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Vb18DsuEiaa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 953101] Review Request: razorqt - Lightweight desktop toolbox
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953101
--- Comment #18 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com ---
As they are not being stored in %{_datadir}/locale/ you are right.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=egzMAGgfwda=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 953101] Review Request: razorqt - Lightweight desktop toolbox
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953101
--- Comment #19 from Eugene A. Pivnev ti.eug...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #18)
As they are not being stored in %{_datadir}/locale/ you are right.
No one.
As I found - preferred way for qt-aps developers - to put translations into
_datadir/%{name}/{translations,l10n,i18n,locale,etc).
This is easier for cross-platform applications.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=JrEXesdTyma=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 907585] Review Request: repsnapper - RepRap control software
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907585 Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||182235 (FE-Legal) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=oKao6aWxDCa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 907585] Review Request: repsnapper - RepRap control software
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907585 Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal) Depends On|182235 (FE-Legal) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=JSK5BEQ17Ma=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894724] Review Request: nodejs-tap - A Test Anything Protocol library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894724 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=GgCg2SOMsJa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894724] Review Request: nodejs-tap - A Test Anything Protocol library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894724 --- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vmgghoyNtJa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925972] Review Request: drupal6-stringoverrides - Provides a quick and easy way of replacing text
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925972 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=yy6YO9NBKTa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925972] Review Request: drupal6-stringoverrides - Provides a quick and easy way of replacing text
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925972 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FkjwoaK6U7a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925974] Review Request: drupal6-user_badges - Enables assignment of graphical badges to users and roles
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925974 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=SUORTCFAYda=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925974] Review Request: drupal6-user_badges - Enables assignment of graphical badges to users and roles
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925974 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=McyoGPF8Tya=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925975] Review Request: drupal6-userpoints - Provides an API for users to gain or lose points
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925975 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=myK8pVyCbPa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925975] Review Request: drupal6-userpoints - Provides an API for users to gain or lose points
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925975 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Azup5mha0la=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925976] Review Request: drupal6-userpoints_votingapi - Integrates User Points with Voting API-based modules like Fivestar
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925976 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LHBtuH4Okda=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925976] Review Request: drupal6-userpoints_votingapi - Integrates User Points with Voting API-based modules like Fivestar
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925976 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qOwvUXNMAla=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925978] Review Request: drupal6-vertical_tabs - Provides vertical tabs for supported forms like the node edit page
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925978 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=z8JXeG6geVa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925978] Review Request: drupal6-vertical_tabs - Provides vertical tabs for supported forms like the node edit page
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925978 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=88bbPRUlqma=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925979] Review Request: drupal6-views_customfield - Provides a number of custom views fields (rownumber, phpcode, ...)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925979 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=WSk2NZxoNUa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925979] Review Request: drupal6-views_customfield - Provides a number of custom views fields (rownumber, phpcode, ...)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925979 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=h4MakATZv6a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925980] Review Request: drupal6-views_datasource - Plugins for Drupal Views for rendering content in a number formats
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925980 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XDHpbXZM9Ka=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925980] Review Request: drupal6-views_datasource - Plugins for Drupal Views for rendering content in a number formats
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925980 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ZiP7x9hRjsa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925982] Review Request: drupal6-vote_up_down - Provides a configurable up/down voting widget for other modules
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925982 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7piX4POiQKa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925982] Review Request: drupal6-vote_up_down - Provides a configurable up/down voting widget for other modules
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925982 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=GdXKEDv2tJa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 921305] Review Request: python-wsme - Web Services Made Easy
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921305 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-wsme-0.5b2-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-wsme-0.5b2-1.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LTAvk84JMMa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925984] Review Request: drupal6-wikitools - Provides helper functionality to have wiki-like behavior
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925984 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=i9vJV4I2fda=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925984] Review Request: drupal6-wikitools - Provides helper functionality to have wiki-like behavior
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925984 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pQ0dS2lk64a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925991] Review Request: drupal6-messaging - Messaging Framework to allow message sending in an independent way
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925991 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pTsKz1sreoa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925991] Review Request: drupal6-messaging - Messaging Framework to allow message sending in an independent way
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925991 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PE2waV319Ja=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925995] Review Request: drupal6-notifications - This is a complete Subscriptions/Notifications Framework
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925995 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=yUZAoCWvesa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925995] Review Request: drupal6-notifications - This is a complete Subscriptions/Notifications Framework
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925995 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CPsFz0uaoJa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 921305] Review Request: python-wsme - Web Services Made Easy
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921305 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-wsme-0.5b2-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-wsme-0.5b2-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=OPyLXiGjYra=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948082] Rename Request: nodejs-cookie-jar - A cookie handling and cookie jar library for Node.js
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948082 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qCbTLYs0tWa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948082] Rename Request: nodejs-cookie-jar - A cookie handling and cookie jar library for Node.js
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948082 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gg8tchErKKa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 921305] Review Request: python-wsme - Web Services Made Easy
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921305 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-wsme-0.5b2-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-wsme-0.5b2-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bvOqK1occca=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 949214] Review Request: python-iptools - A few useful functions and objects for manipulating ip addresses in python
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949214 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=DReiRtCMvWa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 949214] Review Request: python-iptools - A few useful functions and objects for manipulating ip addresses in python
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949214 --- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=x97RwYrUJ0a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 954134] Review Request: mybatis-parent - The MyBatis parent POM
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954134 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=b96ZR6f7Iwa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 954134] Review Request: mybatis-parent - The MyBatis parent POM
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954134 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8EFsMvyvjKa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 950907] Review Request: python-jedi - Python auto-completion
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=950907 Petr Hracek phra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Petr Hracek phra...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-jedi Short Description: Python auto-completion Owners: phra...@redhat.com Branches: f19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6u86zYMWJta=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 950907] Review Request: python-jedi - Python auto-completion
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=950907 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Use your FAS account name, not email address. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=b3VTwaMlBHa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 952579] Review Request: perl-IO-Event - Tied filehandles for nonblocking IO with object callbacks
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952579 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Z3ZaQpyInya=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 952579] Review Request: perl-IO-Event - Tied filehandles for nonblocking IO with object callbacks
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952579 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-IO-Event-0.809-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-IO-Event-0.809-2.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=kwbPD91Ds3a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 952579] Review Request: perl-IO-Event - Tied filehandles for nonblocking IO with object callbacks
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952579 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-IO-Event-0.809-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-IO-Event-0.809-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MakW7JClg2a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 950907] Review Request: python-jedi - Python auto-completion
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=950907 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=R1nR45i1PPa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 954134] Review Request: mybatis-parent - The MyBatis parent POM
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954134 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zMgjchwxMFa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 954134] Review Request: mybatis-parent - The MyBatis parent POM
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954134 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- mybatis-parent-18-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mybatis-parent-18-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=DHfOm3MzMVa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890839] Review Request: slic3r - G-code generator for 3D printers (RepRap, Makerbot, Ultimaker etc.)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890839 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- slic3r-0.9.9-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/slic3r-0.9.9-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=R53TuqrBiKa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 954134] Review Request: mybatis-parent - The MyBatis parent POM
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954134 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- mybatis-parent-18-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mybatis-parent-18-2.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=WBAHdWoQR3a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 950907] Review Request: python-jedi - Python auto-completion
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=950907 Petr Hracek phra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Petr Hracek phra...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-jedi Short Description: Python auto-completion Owners: phracek Branches: f19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bgEk9lWSY1a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 955551] Review Request: python-flask-admin - Simple and extensible admin interface framework for Flask
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=91 Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||mru...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mru...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com --- Will do the review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=X9fFYsNwDda=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 950907] Review Request: python-jedi - Python auto-completion
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=950907 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FqivCFDOVMa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 950907] Review Request: python-jedi - Python auto-completion
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=950907 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xpu5oMskU9a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890839] Review Request: slic3r - G-code generator for 3D printers (RepRap, Makerbot, Ultimaker etc.)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890839 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- slic3r-0.9.9-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/slic3r-0.9.9-3.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CoDjDtSTfXa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 953783] Review Request: vim-taglist - The Tag List plugin is a source code browser plugin for Vim
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953783 --- Comment #4 from Petr Hracek phra...@redhat.com --- I uploaded new version Spec URL: http://phracek.fedorapeople.org/vim-taglist/vim-taglist.spec SRPM URL: http://phracek.fedorapeople.org/vim-taglist/vim-taglist-4.6-2.fc18.src.rpm Source is mentioned in spec file to: http://sourceforge.net/projects/vim-taglist/files/vim-taglist/4.6/taglist_46.zip -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=y64E0YfAkna=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
