[Bug 916087] Review Request: cloud-initramfs-tools - cloud image initramfs management utilities
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916087 Juerg Haefliger changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Rwi7PMbmBZ&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 958358] Review Request: darkhttpd - A secure, lightweight, fast, single-threaded HTTP/1.1 server
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958358 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=doBRelwuOH&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 958358] New: Review Request: darkhttpd - A secure, lightweight, fast, single-threaded HTTP/1.1 server
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958358 Bug ID: 958358 Summary: Review Request: darkhttpd - A secure, lightweight, fast, single-threaded HTTP/1.1 server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: cicku...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Category: --- Spec URL: http://cicku.me/darkhttpd.spec SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/darkhttpd-1.9-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: darkhttpd is a secure, lightweight, fast, single-threaded HTTP/1.1 server. Features: Simple to set up. Single binary, no other files, no installation needed. Standalone, doesn't need inetd or ucspi-tcp. No messing around with config files - all you have to specify is the www root. Written in C - efficient and portable. Small memory footprint. Event loop, single threaded - no fork() or pthreads. Generates directory listings. Supports HTTP GET and HEAD requests. Supports Range / partial content. (try streaming music files or resuming a download) Supports If-Modified-Since. Supports Keep-Alive connections. Can serve 301 redirects based on Host header. Uses sendfile() on FreeBSD, Solaris and Linux. Fedora Account System Username: cicku -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=BX5JR7JZDm&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925991] Review Request: drupal6-messaging - Messaging Framework to allow message sending in an independent way
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925991 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- drupal6-messaging-2.4-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zaYZ6q9R9r&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925991] Review Request: drupal6-messaging - Messaging Framework to allow message sending in an independent way
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925991 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-05-01 00:29:24 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=rOGw6tpwEr&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925995] Review Request: drupal6-notifications - This is a complete Subscriptions/Notifications Framework
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925995 Bug 925995 depends on bug 925991, which changed state. Bug 925991 Summary: Review Request: drupal6-messaging - Messaging Framework to allow message sending in an independent way https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925991 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=oV1a5jnkho&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925995] Review Request: drupal6-notifications - This is a complete Subscriptions/Notifications Framework
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925995 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- drupal6-notifications-2.3-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MGUmFlfzUx&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925995] Review Request: drupal6-notifications - This is a complete Subscriptions/Notifications Framework
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925995 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-05-01 00:29:10 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YV8rgZE3Jx&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925972] Review Request: drupal6-stringoverrides - Provides a quick and easy way of replacing text
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925972 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- drupal6-stringoverrides-1.8-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=mX7jrCANDU&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925972] Review Request: drupal6-stringoverrides - Provides a quick and easy way of replacing text
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925972 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-05-01 00:28:48 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MLdnT9tTuf&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925982] Review Request: drupal6-vote_up_down - Provides a configurable up/down voting widget for other modules
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925982 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-05-01 00:28:37 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hVpXc03JS2&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925982] Review Request: drupal6-vote_up_down - Provides a configurable up/down voting widget for other modules
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925982 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- drupal6-vote_up_down-3.2-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hBOIMSCSvG&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925978] Review Request: drupal6-vertical_tabs - Provides vertical tabs for supported forms like the node edit page
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925978 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- drupal6-vertical_tabs-1.0-0.1.rc2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=I9AexR5z9u&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925978] Review Request: drupal6-vertical_tabs - Provides vertical tabs for supported forms like the node edit page
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925978 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-05-01 00:27:35 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2YvPFCAIlm&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 956297] Review Request: perl-Spellunker - Pure perl spelling checker implementation
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956297 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Spellunker-0.2.3-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=D8N9YQEKnR&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925979] Review Request: drupal6-views_customfield - Provides a number of custom views fields (rownumber, phpcode, ...)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925979 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- drupal6-views_customfield-1.0-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=lxxkEnH74k&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925979] Review Request: drupal6-views_customfield - Provides a number of custom views fields (rownumber, phpcode, ...)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925979 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-05-01 00:27:03 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qaKL0YFyhP&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 851267] Review Request: arc-gui-clients - ARC Graphical Clients
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851267 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System --- arc-gui-clients-0.4.3-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=yIwPXjvCZ1&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 851267] Review Request: arc-gui-clients - ARC Graphical Clients
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851267 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-05-01 00:26:45 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=aTq2Lkan2h&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925989] Review Request: drupal6-devel - Various blocks, pages, and functions for developers
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925989 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- drupal6-devel-1.27-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CEp7rIStwB&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925990] Review Request: drupal6-path_redirect - Redirect users from one URL to another
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925990 Bug 925990 depends on bug 925989, which changed state. Bug 925989 Summary: Review Request: drupal6-devel - Various blocks, pages, and functions for developers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925989 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=sBXseC4ZO0&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925989] Review Request: drupal6-devel - Various blocks, pages, and functions for developers
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925989 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-05-01 00:26:33 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XbV0ZQ13jV&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925984] Review Request: drupal6-wikitools - Provides helper functionality to have wiki-like behavior
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925984 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- drupal6-wikitools-1.3-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vkePZqCN0H&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925984] Review Request: drupal6-wikitools - Provides helper functionality to have wiki-like behavior
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925984 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-05-01 00:26:22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=OoJyMFEcaX&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892625] Review Request: resiprocate - SIP reference implementation, SIP proxy, TURN server
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892625 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System --- resiprocate-1.8.7-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nfxiLmg4CP&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925975] Review Request: drupal6-userpoints - Provides an API for users to gain or lose points
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925975 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- drupal6-userpoints-1.2-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Ha5tqQdadW&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925975] Review Request: drupal6-userpoints - Provides an API for users to gain or lose points
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925975 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-05-01 00:25:57 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=eVsKfXMkuJ&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 958006] Review Request: zanata-common - zanata common modules
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958006 Ding-Yi Chen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||dc...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dc...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=aKjLZRKDaq&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 919260] Review Request: gtkspellmm30 - C++ bindings for gtkspell3
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919260 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- gtkspellmm30-3.0.1-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=wYm9arkjN8&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 919260] Review Request: gtkspellmm30 - C++ bindings for gtkspell3
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919260 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-05-01 00:25:07 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4yL9pL5qyG&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925968] Review Request: drupal6-node_import - Allows users to import node content from a CSV or TSV file
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925968 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-05-01 00:24:51 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=achsdJLp0B&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925968] Review Request: drupal6-node_import - Allows users to import node content from a CSV or TSV file
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925968 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- drupal6-node_import-1.2-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=BngP2FTLHI&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925980] Review Request: drupal6-views_datasource - Plugins for Drupal Views for rendering content in a number formats
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925980 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- drupal6-views_datasource-1.0-0.1.beta2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=iDdUFxI8Fm&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925980] Review Request: drupal6-views_datasource - Plugins for Drupal Views for rendering content in a number formats
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925980 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-05-01 00:24:39 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ZrWlQHOSNC&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925976] Review Request: drupal6-userpoints_votingapi - Integrates User Points with Voting API-based modules like Fivestar
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925976 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- drupal6-userpoints_votingapi-1.41-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qbaVa2rK2o&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925976] Review Request: drupal6-userpoints_votingapi - Integrates User Points with Voting API-based modules like Fivestar
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925976 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-05-01 00:24:24 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=yyDmHkTkxQ&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925974] Review Request: drupal6-user_badges - Enables assignment of graphical badges to users and roles
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925974 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- drupal6-user_badges-1.6-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pTZovVs8kB&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925974] Review Request: drupal6-user_badges - Enables assignment of graphical badges to users and roles
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925974 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-05-01 00:24:07 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=3NCCzjIPgi&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925990] Review Request: drupal6-path_redirect - Redirect users from one URL to another
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925990 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- drupal6-path_redirect-1.0-0.2.rc2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=P41oQGKTAL&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925990] Review Request: drupal6-path_redirect - Redirect users from one URL to another
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925990 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-05-01 00:22:34 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=T92hmte8sN&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 958006] Review Request: zanata-common - zanata common modules
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958006 --- Comment #2 from Patrick Huang --- Tested under f18. Need to make a change. Koji build:http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5319907 Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pahuang/zanata-common.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pahuang/zanata-common-2.2.1-2.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qq7qY1USm0&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 958139] Review Request: owasp-java-html-sanitizer - A fast HTML Sanitizer written in Java
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958139 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=rZQtYRrts6&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892625] Review Request: resiprocate - SIP reference implementation, SIP proxy, TURN server
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892625 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System --- resiprocate-1.8.7-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xwtPS4RhCZ&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957544] Review Request: java-base64 - Java class for encoding and decoding Base64 notation
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957544 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: base64 -|Review Request: java-base64 |Java class for encoding and |- Java class for encoding |decoding Base64 notation|and decoding Base64 ||notation --- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo --- Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/java-base64.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/java-base64-2.3.8-1.fc18.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7UqomWTKg6&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 917365] Review Request: ibus-bogo - Vietnamese engine for IBus input platform
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=917365 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- ibus-bogo-0.3-4.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=F3OKzCjv8K&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 917365] Review Request: ibus-bogo - Vietnamese engine for IBus input platform
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=917365 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5ZNC015OL6&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 905681] Review Request: ultimaker-marlin-firmware - Ultimaker firmware for the 3D printer
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905681 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- ultimaker-marlin-firmware-12.12-0.5.RC1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FBjOt0ali3&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 905681] Review Request: ultimaker-marlin-firmware - Ultimaker firmware for the 3D printer
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905681 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-04-30 23:32:10 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=q7qOkQMcWB&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 905681] Review Request: ultimaker-marlin-firmware - Ultimaker firmware for the 3D printer
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905681 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- ultimaker-marlin-firmware-12.12-0.5.RC1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xSduBSDzJy&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 958132] Review Request: soxr - The SoX Resampler library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958132 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- soxr-0.1.1-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=cDGjf6un28&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 958132] Review Request: soxr - The SoX Resampler library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958132 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=08V9zMTmbm&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 927477] Review Request: remake - Build system that bridges the gap between make and redo
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927477 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- remake-0.4-3.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=tymv5h9Ouq&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892625] Review Request: resiprocate - SIP reference implementation, SIP proxy, TURN server
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892625 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- resiprocate-1.8.7-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=skPn5dDMLh&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892625] Review Request: resiprocate - SIP reference implementation, SIP proxy, TURN server
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892625 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-04-30 23:27:50 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=K07sl75TOy&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 829580] Review Request: python-traitsui - User interface tools designed to complement Traits
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829580 Bug 829580 depends on bug 955801, which changed state. Bug 955801 Summary: Review Request: python-pyface - Generic User Interface objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=955801 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=znbvcc7AYw&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 955801] Review Request: python-pyface - Generic User Interface objects
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=955801 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2013-04-30 22:58:02 --- Comment #11 from Orion Poplawski --- checked in and built. Thanks all! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=TX93dbpHWD&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957415] Review Request: lnav - Logfile Navigator
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957415
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> 0. The SRPM used in koji build referenced in Comment #1 differs from the one
> submitted for review. The one submitted here doesn't build.
Oh..Maybe I submitted the wrong revision...Fixed.
>
> 1. Similarly to 'lookat', you'll need to regenerate upstream build files to
> support aarch64. However, calling autoreconf here fails on automake because
> some of the standard distribution files, namely AUTHORS and ChangeLog, are
> missing.
>
> Option #1: Ask upstream to include those files.
>
> Option #2: Force automake to use different strictness level, e.g. "foreign".
> See automake info page for details on this.
I've sent a mail to upstream and I'm just waiting for the answer.
> 2. None of the source files mentions their license, neither do the README
> files. Both standard BSD 2-clause (./LICENSE) license and GPLv3 (./COPYING)
> are included. It's possible the project uses them both but please ask
> upstream for clarification. If both are really used, the correct License
> tag will be "BSD and GPLv3+". See the Licensing Guidelines for valid short
> names:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#SoftwareLicenses
Sent.
> 3. Build-time dependencies are incorrect.
> You can safely drop those:
> - glibc-devel
> - libstdc++-devel
> - libtool
> However, the following is necessary for the package to build:
> - openssl-devel
Yeah I know the openssl.a and that's why you failed... This is listed in my
koji build, please abandon comment 1~
> 4. There's a test suite. Use it. (i.e., make a %check section which runs
> "make check")
Fixed.
> 5. Package COPYING in %doc as well, if relevant (after your resolve issue
> #2).
Okay.
> 6. Summary -- Add "The".
Replaced with : A curses-based tool for viewing and analyzing log files
> 7. %description -- Replace both "lnav" occurences with %{name}.
Oh... MUST/SHOULD?
BTW I'll realease next version when everything looks fine.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1AimEaCNbM&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957436] Review Request: lookat - User-Friendly Text File Viewer
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957436
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> 1. Summary -- you don't have to capitalize every word; in fact, you
> shouldn't. Change it to something like "A user-friendly text file viewer".
This is a copy and paste error, fixed.
> 2. %description -- substitute "lookat" with %{name}.
Well I never do this in my packages' %description section, I think it's a bit
ugly...
Is it a MUST or SHOULD?
> 3. Build-time dependencies:
> - glibc-devel is not used at all, remove it,
> - the same applies to libtool,
> - and pkgconfig too.
Fixed.
> 4. License -- FSF address stated in COPYING and all of the source files
> (*.[ch]) is outdated. Please, ask upstream to fix this in the next release.
> The current license is available here:
> https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.txt
Waiting upstream.
> 5. Upstream build scripts don't provide support for aarch64. Please, run
> 'autoreconf -fiv' in the beginning of your %build section (or in %prep if
> you prefer) to fix this.
Fixed, but there are no docs around currently. Where can I get detailed
information to prevent things happen again?
> 6. There's no need to define prefix, sysconfdir, or mandir. Just call plain
> '%configure' and watch the magic happen.
Fixed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2YYyA9TUDl&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 958344] Review Request: python-extras - Useful extra bits for Python
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958344 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||886003 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=lGztKokiNj&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 958344] New: Review Request: python-extras - Useful extra bits for Python
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958344 Bug ID: 958344 Summary: Review Request: python-extras - Useful extra bits for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: michel+...@sylvestre.me QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Category: --- Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/funpl/python-extras.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/funpl/python-extras-0.0.3-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: extras is a set of extensions to the Python standard library, originally written to make the code within testtools cleaner, but now split out for general use outside of a testing context. Fedora Account System Username: salimma -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0b4XUj7GwG&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957544] Review Request: base64 - Java class for encoding and decoding Base64 notation
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957544 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||or...@cora.nwra.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|or...@cora.nwra.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Orion Poplawski --- We need a less generic name here. I suggest java-base64 or iharder-base64. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=wyyc7UZctc&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 956737] Review Request: recoverjpeg - Recover jpeg pictures and mov movies from damaged devices
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956737 --- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng --- (In reply to comment #1) All 2 issues fixed. New upstream release: Spec URL: http://cicku.me/recoverjpeg.spec SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/recoverjpeg-2.2.3-1.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=rla4rhXgus&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957929] Review Request: nodejs-get - A slightly higher-level HTTP client for node
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957929 Tom Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Tom Hughes --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: nodejs-get Short Description: A slightly higher-level HTTP client for Node.js Owners: tomh Branches: f19 f18 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=sDJujOh2N9&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957800] Review Request: tegrarcm - Send code to a Tegra device in recovery mode
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957800 Michael Scherer changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Michael Scherer --- Ok, i guess that should do it, let's approve it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=c0N6MVPrSi&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957929] Review Request: nodejs-get - A slightly higher-level HTTP client for node
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957929 Michael Scherer changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Michael Scherer --- Damn, tought I set it to + already, sorry. So it should be good. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=9rpkL7QqSe&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766883] Review Request: gerris - computational fluid dynamics flow solver
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766883 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(jonathan.underwoo ||d...@gmail.com) --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts --- I am triaging old review tickets. I can't promise a review if you reply, but by closing out the stale tickets we can devote extra attention to the ones which aren't stale. This one fails to build for me, due to come autoconf issues. Here's a scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5319486 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=GQwYkLdlui&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 744066] Review Request: vide - programmer's terminal for vim
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744066 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(l...@redhat.com) --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts --- Why would anyone review a package they know doesn't meet the packaging guidelines? In any case, there doesn't appear to be any way to get the srpm in order to review the package. The only thing you provide is a link to a build in koji which was garbage collected long ago. (Files from scratch builds are only kept for two weeks.) If you need a place to store your files, just use your fedorapeople space. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=AQg2xqCGah&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957800] Review Request: tegrarcm - Send code to a Tegra device in recovery mode
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957800 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) --- Hi Michael, patch sent upstream about the License redistribution. I've made a fixed tarball and included the license in %%doc without bumping the release locally. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=rXVP8a2gOP&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 958059] Review Request: yum-axelget - A plugin for Yum based on Axel that accelerates your download's rate
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958059 --- Comment #4 from Andrea Veri --- Honestly it seems that the development of this software is dead already since several years. That's probably why no one ever packaged this. Thanks for the review! I'm currently not sure on how to move forward, if one of the rules for having a package accepted is an active upstream, then we can close the review request. What do you think? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=OwLtk33ZiI&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957929] Review Request: nodejs-get - A slightly higher-level HTTP client for node
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957929 --- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes --- Links added. The travis failures is only on node 0.4, presumably because the end() routine doesn't exist there - it is passing on 0.6 and without those calls added the tests fail on 0.10. Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-get.spec SRPM URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-get-1.2.1-2.fc18.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=w4Raucc6qb&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 958059] Review Request: yum-axelget - A plugin for Yum based on Axel that accelerates your download's rate
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958059 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anto.tra...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande --- Hi Andrea. - This package doesn't provide any License file. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text - axelget.py is released with a GPLv2+ license. License tag is GPLv2+. - 'yum-fastestmirror' now is 'yum-plugin-fastestmirror' in Fedora, I think a distinction between Fedora and epel5 is better choice. - RPM doesn't need anymore of %defattr(-,root,root,-) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_Permissions - This software needs 'presto' file from 'yum-presto' package. - Please, check the yum-axelget building in EPEL5. In my opinion, you need to know how much long time upstream wants to maintain development of this software; otherwise all our efforts will be useless. :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Tbm3eRv3yW&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957929] Review Request: nodejs-get - A slightly higher-level HTTP client for node
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957929
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@zarb.org
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@zarb.org
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Michael Scherer ---
Besides the issue with patches, which is not blocking, the package is good,
and so is approved. Can you add the 2 urls in comment ?
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= Notes =
- Patch1 and Patch0 have been pushed upstream, but should be documented
( especially since Patch1 break travis :/ )
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses
found. Please check the source files for licenses manually.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[!]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
Note: Package contains tarball without URL, check comments
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI
[Bug 717750] Review Request: lttv - Linux Trace Toolkit Viewer
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717750 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2013-04-30 17:37:58 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts --- No point in having a ticket open when there's nothing to review, so I'll go ahead and close this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=EhkhUwnywl&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957800] Review Request: tegrarcm - Send code to a Tegra device in recovery mode
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957800
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
QA Contact|extras...@fedoraproject.org |m...@zarb.org
Flags||fedora-review?
CC||m...@zarb.org
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@zarb.org
--- Comment #2 from Michael Scherer ---
Strange, there is a license file upstream, but not in the tarball you used
http://nv-tegra.nvidia.com/gitweb/?p=tools/tegrarcm.git;a=blob;f=LICENSE;h=e126375e90e22f37d28924621181ab932a87d8b3;hb=HEAD
I guess the makefile forget to bundled it, can you see with upstream and ship
the file ?
( I think "EXTRA_DIST = LICENSE" in makefile.am would do the trick )
Anyway, if you can fix that, that would be good.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= Errors =
[!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[!] License is not valid, there is 2 And instead of 1
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"BSD (3 clause)", "Unknown or generated". 3 files have unknown license.
Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/misc/checkout/git/FedoraReview/957800-tegrarcm/licensecheck.txt
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must
be documented in the spec.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[Bug 958132] Review Request: soxr - The SoX Resampler library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958132 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- soxr-0.1.1-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/soxr-0.1.1-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=b91rmTOw1x&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 958132] Review Request: soxr - The SoX Resampler library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958132 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- soxr-0.1.1-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/soxr-0.1.1-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ko4EuXvkTR&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 958132] Review Request: soxr - The SoX Resampler library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958132 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=KnHIyrRvq8&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 919495] Review Request: minlog - Minimal overhead Java logging
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919495 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XfDlGLbQNB&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 919495] Review Request: minlog - Minimal overhead Java logging
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919495 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- minlog-1.2-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hMM8Jv6qEu&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 956063] Review Request: python-gevent-socketio - SocketIO server based on the Gevent pywsgi server
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956063 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- python-gevent-socketio-0.3.5-2.rc2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Id1ycCmC9x&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 956063] Review Request: python-gevent-socketio - SocketIO server based on the Gevent pywsgi server
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956063 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=w1WpbNAHkw&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 958132] Review Request: soxr - The SoX Resampler library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958132 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=b5DWPvnFKc&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 958132] Review Request: soxr - The SoX Resampler library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958132 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=l0Px9HrbUW&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 958132] Review Request: soxr - The SoX Resampler library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958132 Richard Shaw changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Richard Shaw --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: soxr Short Description: The SoX Resampler library Owners: hobbes1069 Branches: f18 f19 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hdzepEdwMq&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 958132] Review Request: soxr - The SoX Resampler library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958132 --- Comment #2 from Richard Shaw --- > [ ]: rpmlint warns of an unused direct shlib dependency. > > This is not a blocker issue, but it may be possible to fix this. See: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#unused-direct-shlib- > dependency This is very common with cmake projects, I'll add -Wl,--as-needed to the linker flags to fix this when I do the official build. Thanks for the quick review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=J6oQ1C1p8p&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 958132] Review Request: soxr - The SoX Resampler library
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958132
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from T.C. Hollingsworth ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Status: APPROVED
= Things to Consider =
[ ]: rpmlint warns of an unused direct shlib dependency.
This is not a blocker issue, but it may be possible to fix this. See:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#unused-direct-shlib-dependency
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"LGPL (v2.1 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 2 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/fedora/patches/FedoraReview/958132-soxr/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
Note: Package contains no Conflicts: tag(s)
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: CheckResultdir
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: No
[Bug 952141] Review Request: python-mccabe - McCabe complexity checker
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952141 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- python-mccabe-0.2.1-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-mccabe-0.2.1-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=sJfQpVozHZ&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957238] Review Request: julius-voxforge - VoxForge Acoustic Model files for Julius
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957238 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5RyS4EJ4Mg&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957238] Review Request: julius-voxforge - VoxForge Acoustic Model files for Julius
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957238 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=jImcPXWsl5&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 723326] Review Request: dolibarr - ERP & CRM for small companies, freelances or foundations
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723326
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(eldy@destailleur.
||fr)
--- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ---
I am triaging old review tickets. I can't promise a review if you reply, but
by closing out the stale tickets we can devote extra attention to the ones
which aren't stale.
Please post a spec file so that people can look at without chasing down your
srpm and unpacking it.
Note a few rpmlint complaints:
dolibarr.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL-3.0+
Please use a valid License: tag from
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main
dolibarr.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/dolibarr/htdocs/webservices/demo_wsclient_category.php-NORUN
dolibarr.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/dolibarr/htdocs/cron/info.php
dolibarr.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/dolibarr/htdocs/webservices/server_category.php
Might want to fix these upstream.
dolibarr.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/share/dolibarr/htdocs/includes/odtphp/odt2pdf.sh 0644L /bin/bash
Why is there a shell script under htdocs?
dolibarr.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm
dolibarr.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%postun rm
You really shouldn't do this kind of thing. I unpacked the srpm to look at the
scriptlets, and they are pretty much totally insane. scriptlets cannot produce
output. You should include a sane configuration file in the package and not
mess with it on package upgrades. The selinux stuff on the surface is OK,
though if this package gets in you should communicate with the selinux team to
get the necessary contexts into the default policy. Also, I don't think
httpd_sys_script_rw_t is a valid context. Your scriptlets to restart things
are completely improper. And I'm out of breath now.
Throughout the spec you use macro forms for commands like "%{__chmod}". These
should not be used; just say "chmod" instead.
That's about all I have time for at the moment; there are plenty of other
issues I can see, though.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8pTGB3hq2R&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 717750] Review Request: lttv - Linux Trace Toolkit Viewer
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717750 Yannick Brosseau changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(yannick.brosseau@ | |gmail.com) | --- Comment #7 from Yannick Brosseau --- This old version is not supported anymore upstream. A completely reworked version is being worked on. Is it best to close this one and recreate a new one when a new version is available upstream (probably in a few months) ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=l40KLCtp2H&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 958132] Review Request: soxr - The SoX Resampler library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958132 T.C. Hollingsworth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||tchollingswo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|tchollingswo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=lZkbdomg6A&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 717750] Review Request: lttv - Linux Trace Toolkit Viewer
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717750 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(yannick.brosseau@ ||gmail.com) --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts --- I am triaging old review tickets. I can't promise a review if you reply, but by closing out the stale tickets we can devote extra attention to the ones which aren't stale. Package fails to build for me. Here is a scratch build in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5318819 A build in f18 fails for me in the same manner. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=EiLdE1zE3q&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 954108] Review Request: gimp-gap - The GIMP Animation Package
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954108 --- Comment #13 from Antonio Trande --- (In reply to comment #12) > @Antonio gimp-gap does not contain .configure script as it from git and not > release, so I need generate it. > You may work with upstream in order to release gimp-gap with a preconfigured script (like most upstreams do) otherwise by managing scripts locally, ensuring yourself they have been generated fine especially after a new Autotools release; integrating all changes as patches or additional files. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=JGkv9ei3cy&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 958131] Review Request: mysql-community - rename community-mysql to mysql-community
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958131 --- Comment #2 from Bjorn Munch --- (In reply to comment #1) > One initial comment, I see no > > Obsoletes (or Provides) in place to handle naming transition from > community-mysql > to > mysql-community We could add that, but community-mysql has only ever been in rawhide/alpha. Also, that package did not obsolete the previous name MySQL. What it sort-of obsoletes is the mysql packages in F18 but that's done by MariaDB. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=umzcaeBE32&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957238] Review Request: julius-voxforge - VoxForge Acoustic Model files for Julius
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957238 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: julius-voxforge Short Description: VoxForge Acoustic Model files for Julius Owners: spot Branches: f17 f18 f19 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xEyXqisVQ9&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957238] Review Request: julius-voxforge - VoxForge Acoustic Model files for Julius
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957238 --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway --- I'll flip it to GPLv2+ before I commit it to git. Thanks for the quick review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zsaajzKcPx&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 952141] Review Request: python-mccabe - McCabe complexity checker
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952141 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- python-mccabe-0.2.1-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-mccabe-0.2.1-2.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=tI44K6oLFJ&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 952141] Review Request: python-mccabe - McCabe complexity checker
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952141 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- python-mccabe-0.2.1-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-mccabe-0.2.1-2.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=L6ECydfQNf&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 956931] Review Request: homerun - Application Launcher for KDE
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931 --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter --- As long as you don't mind the main pkg getting multilib'd because of a lack of -libs subpkg, then it's ok. :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MYNJg6WjPo&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
