[Bug 961642] Review Request: ubuntu-font-family - The fonts used in Ubuntu Linux
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961642 --- Comment #3 from K.Prasad kpra...@gmx.com --- Thanks Antonio. I'll request them to review this license. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=lWsEQtkLTHa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 921797] Review Request: pypolicyd-spf - SPF Policy Server for Postfix (Python implementation)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921797 --- Comment #5 from Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com --- New files: ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/pypolicyd-spf/pypolicyd-spf.spec ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/pypolicyd-spf/pypolicyd-spf-1.1.2-1.fc18.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=tZ7jVB4V6Ia=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962160] New: Review Request: iipsrv - Light-weight streaming for viewing and zooming of ultra high-resolution images
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962160 Bug ID: 962160 Summary: Review Request: iipsrv - Light-weight streaming for viewing and zooming of ultra high-resolution images Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jo...@x-tnd.be QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Category: --- Spec URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/iipsrv/iipsrv.spec SRPM URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/iipsrv/iipsrv-1.0.0-0.1.git0b63de7.fc18.src.rpm Description: Light-weight streaming for viewing and zooming of ultra high-resolution images Fedora Account System Username: trasher -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gCqPByuMH7a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 924263] Review Request: caja-dropbox - Dropbox extension for caja
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924263 --- Comment #2 from Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de --- New mock build: * Sun May 12 2013 Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de - 1.6.0-1 - add require hicolor-icon-theme - remove useless libmatenotify BR - clean up BR's - switch to current upstream source - fix licence information Spec URL: http://raveit65.fedorapeople.org/Mate/SPECS/caja-dropbox.spec SRPM URL: http://raveit65.fedorapeople.org/Mate/SRPM/caja-dropbox-1.6.0-1.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7hIwfuaNjua=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 960870] RFE: Include numatop in numactl package
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960870 Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC|leamas.a...@gmail.com, |nott...@redhat.com, |pin...@pingoured.fr,|package-review@lists.fedora |socho...@redhat.com |project.org Component|fedora-review |Package Review Assignee|socho...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #5 from Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr --- Re-assigning to the right component -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=UNuRQ8JtQ0a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 960870] RFE: Include numatop in numactl package
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960870 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2013-05-12 05:12:45 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=a6vRJzRgTEa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882476] Review Request: openid4java - This library allows you to OpenID-enable your Java webapp
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882476 --- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/openid4java.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/openid4java-0.9.7-0.1.720.fc18.src.rpm Description: OpenID4Java library offers support for OpenID-enabling a consumer site or implementing an OpenID Provider server. Update to 0.9.7.720 Tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5369052 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ekF4L9Mxp0a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882474] Review Request: spymemcached - Java client for memcached
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882474 --- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/spymemcached.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/spymemcached-2.8.12-1.fc18.src.rpm - update to 2.8.12 Tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5369119 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7FqOw8tXtna=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882475] Review Request: cas-client - Jasig CAS Client for Java
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882475 --- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/cas-client.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/cas-client-3.2.1-2.fc18.src.rpm - disable tomcat6 module -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=W2q16a1GqSa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 959926] Review Request: libyui - GUI-abstraction library
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959926
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mschwe...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com ---
A first look at the spec file. Mostly minor issues (related to Fedora Packaging
Guidelines):
* rpmlint output is clean except for false positives about spelling errors
and shared-lib-calls-exit which is known and covered by a git pull request
already.
BuildRequires:boost-devel%{?_isa}
BuildRequires:cmake%{?_isa} = 2.8
BuildRequires:doxygen%{?_isa}
BuildRequires:fdupes%{?_isa}
BuildRequires:gcc-c++%{?_isa}
BuildRequires:graphviz%{?_isa}
BuildRequires:pkgconfig%{?_isa}
Using %_isa in BuildRequires is more confusing than beneficial. First of all,
these BuildRequires become the src.rpm's Requires:
$ rpm -qpR libyui-3.0.3*.src.rpm
boost-devel(x86-64)
cmake(x86-64) = 2.8
doxygen(x86-64)
fdupes(x86-64)
gcc-c++(x86-64)
graphviz(x86-64)
pkgconfig(x86-64)
rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1
And usually one publishes a single src.rpm in a common source repository
for all target architectures. The expanded %_isa value is the one from the
build environment the src.rpm has been built on. That may be wrong and
confusing. It could even be from a build machine with a completely different
architecture. For example, boost-devel(x86-64) is not available for i686,
where the requirement ought to be boost-devel(x86-32). It would be strictly
required to rebuild the src.rpm to fix its Requires. Even if no conditional
arch-dependent build requirements are used in the spec file.
Conclusively: Not using %_isa in BuildRequires is fine and much more common,
too.
BuildRequires:gcc-c++%{?_isa}
gcc-c++ (as well as gcc and a few more) are expected to be available
in the minimum build environment:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRequires
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Exceptions_2
%package devel
Requires: glibc-devel%{?_isa}
Requires: libstdc++-devel%{?_isa}
Same here. Except that are indirectly required by gcc gcc-c++ already.
Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}
At Fedora, the base package dependency is more strict and includes %{release},
too. This is because either the base package or the subpackage may be patched,
and a strict dependency enforces that they match eachother:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package
Summary: Header files for %{name}
More accurate would be something like
Summary: Files needed for developing with %{name}
since the package clearly contains more than just the headers. ;-)
%package devel
URL: https://github.com/%{name}/%{name}/
No need to duplicate the URL tag here. It is inherited from the base package
URL.
%package doc
Group:Development/Libraries
URL: https://github.com/%{name}/%{name}/
Same here. Plus, group Documentation would be appropriate:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Documentation
%build
CFLAGS=${CFLAGS:-%optflags} ; export CFLAGS ;
CXXFLAGS=${CXXFLAGS:-%optflags} ; export CXXFLAGS ;
FFLAGS=${FFLAGS:-%optflags%{?_fmoddir: -I%_fmoddir}} ; export FFLAGS ;
FCFLAGS=${FCFLAGS:-%optflags%{?_fmoddir: -I%_fmoddir}} ; export FCFLAGS ;
%{?__global_ldflags:LDFLAGS=${LDFLAGS:-%__global_ldflags} ; export LDFLAGS
;}
cmake .. \
Check out the %cmake macro which makes all this easier (rpm --eval %cmake):
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Cmake
%install
cd build
rm -rf %{buildroot}
It is emptied automatically already:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} install
Nowadays there's a %make_install macro for that.
install -m0644
Using also option -p can be helpful for packages, not just if they contain
old/ancient files:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Timestamps
%clean
rm -rf %{buildroot}
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25clean
%dir %{_datadir}/%{name}
-- Theme-Dir: /usr/share/libyui/theme
It would make sense to include this [empty] directory in this package, because
there is code in the lib that uses this path. A pkgconfig variable is defined
for it, too.
%doc %dir %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}
It's a directory and never marked as %doc. Files are to be marked as %doc.
%defattr(-,root,root)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_Permissions
%files devel
%doc %dir
[Bug 894604] Review Request: coin-or-Ipopt - Interior Point OPTimizer
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894604 Paulo Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Paulo Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: coin-or-Ipopt Short Description: Interior Point OPTimizer Owners: pcpa Branches: f18 f19 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xLojC0Ehkia=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962189] New: Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 Bug ID: 962189 Summary: Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: cicku...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Category: --- Spec URL: http://cicku.me/cego.spec SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/cego-2.17.12-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: An open source implementation of a relational and transnational database system using an object oriented software design. It supports SQL query requests using all common programming interfaces (C, C++, DBD, Java). The system architecture is multi-threaded based on POSIX threads and is designed for high end performance and availability. Fedora Account System Username: cicku -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=mmYsJRAoZra=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962190] New: Review Request: kgb-bot - IRC Collaboration Bot
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962190 Bug ID: 962190 Summary: Review Request: kgb-bot - IRC Collaboration Bot Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: andrea.v...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Category: --- Spec URL: http://averi.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/kgb-bot/kgb-bot.spec SRPM URL: http://averi.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/kgb-bot/kgb-bot-1.26-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: KGB is an IRC bot, helping people work together by notifying an IRC channel when a commit occurs. It supports multiple repositories/IRC channels and is fully configurable. Fedora Account System Username: averi For building this package you actually need perl-File-Touch and perl-Schedule-RateLimiter which are both on the fedora-testing-updates repository. You can enable them by tweaking your /etc/mock/fedora-18-x86_64 configuration file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=loT2ej9QT4a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962190] Review Request: kgb-bot - IRC Collaboration Bot
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962190 --- Comment #1 from Andrea Veri andrea.v...@gmail.com --- The rpmlint error: kgb-bot.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/kgb-bot/kgb.conf 0640 is expected, the kgb-bot daemon wants its conf file to be non-world-readable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5pcN4F5kooa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 960198] Review Request: libyui-gtk - Gtk User Interface for libyui
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960198 Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|NEW --- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com --- As a hint, the Spec URL: and SRPM URL: fields in bugzilla review tickets are found and parsed by the fedora-review tool. Keeping them up-to-date makes it possible for reviewers to run fedora-review and have the tool download the latest src.rpm. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5fUfaqdVUca=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 920879] Review Request: tali - GNOME tali game
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920879 Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=cQ5lME3ln0a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 959926] Review Request: libyui - GUI-abstraction library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959926 --- Comment #3 from Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com --- Spec URL: http://besser82.fedorapeople.org/pkg/libyui/libyui.spec SRPM URL: http://besser82.fedorapeople.org/pkg/libyui/libyui-3.0.3-1.fc18.src.rpm Thanks for your review, Michael! Uploaded fixed spec and new SRPM to location above. Please review again. Cheers, Björn. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5inb1pHWtxa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 757484] Review Request: perl-Router-Simple - Simple HTTP router
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757484 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PK071Etrmoa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 757484] Review Request: perl-Router-Simple - Simple HTTP router
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757484 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HwLlgWHz2Ia=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894604] Review Request: coin-or-Ipopt - Interior Point OPTimizer
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894604 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5u67pDQPz0a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894604] Review Request: coin-or-Ipopt - Interior Point OPTimizer
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894604 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=sxGmaRbcqJa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||960041, 959974 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FaSr5nFxbaa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 959974] Review Request: liblfc - Lemke Foundation Classes
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959974 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||962189 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XuQunMj4Yoa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 960041] Review Request: liblfc-xml - Lemke Foundation Classes XML extension
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960041 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||962189 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=jSjgdUdqQKa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 960784] Review Request: trac-fedmsg-plugin - Emit fedmsg messages
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960784
Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@zarb.org
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@zarb.org
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org ---
No issues noted.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
Unknown or generated. 2 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/misc/checkout/git/FedoraReview/960784-trac-fedmsg-
plugin/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded
[Bug 914005] Package Rename Review Request: cobertura-maven-plugin - Features of Cobertura within Maven
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914005 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Are the other branch maintainers on board with this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=fZ3Zcr9TQya=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 914005] Package Rename Review Request: cobertura-maven-plugin - Features of Cobertura within Maven
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914005 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=IBanNBCnMaa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 920875] Review Request: quadrapassel - GNOME quadrapassel game
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920875 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0NbSgWFrc3a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 920875] Review Request: quadrapassel - GNOME quadrapassel game
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920875 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LkKqnRyypma=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 920879] Review Request: tali - GNOME tali game
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920879 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2cvWzAetSza=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 920879] Review Request: tali - GNOME tali game
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920879 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=716PFeFSSfa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 920909] Review Request: gnome-chess - GNOME Chess game
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920909 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XUAEdBqZYDa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 920909] Review Request: gnome-chess - GNOME Chess game
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920909 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=JBuTw3sKypa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 961303] Review Request: mingw-winpthreads - MinGW pthread library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961303 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Vb3L1TuxkAa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 961303] Review Request: mingw-winpthreads - MinGW pthread library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961303 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1Hv2m0RcbAa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 961405] Review Request: mingw-openjpeg - MinGW Windows OpenJPEG library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961405 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Unretired, please take ownership in pkgdb. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=lrT8Lp8Q60a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 961405] Review Request: mingw-openjpeg - MinGW Windows OpenJPEG library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961405 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=sGRuKfrHXha=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 903380] Review Request: libint2 - A library for efficient evaluation of electron repulsion integrals
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903380 Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ | Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi --- Package Change Request == Package Name: libint2 New Branches: EL-5 EL-6 Owners: jussilehtola InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=kUl4D49Jxxa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 955913] Review Request: nsnake - Classic snake game on console
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=955913 --- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #3) Initial rpmlint stuff: nsnake.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/nsnake root 04755L The file is setuid; this may be dangerous, especially if this file is setuid root. Sometimes file capabilities can be used instead of setuid bits. Fixed. nsnake.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/nsnake 04755L A standard executable should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have a wrong executable permissions in some files included in your package. Fixed. nsnake.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man6/nsnake.6.gz The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. Fixed. nsnake.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man6/nsnake.6.gz 1: warning: macro `' not defined This man page may contain problems that can cause it not to be formatted as intended. nsnake.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man6/nsnake.6.gz 5: warning: macro `--' not defined This man page may contain problems that can cause it not to be formatted as intended. nsnake.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man6/nsnake.6.gz 9: warning: macro `' not defined This man page may contain problems that can cause it not to be formatted as intended. nsnake.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man6/nsnake.6.gz 17: warning: macro `---' not defined This man page may contain problems that can cause it not to be formatted as intended. nsnake.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man6/nsnake.6.gz 44: warning: macro `-' not defined This man page may contain problems that can cause it not to be formatted as intended. nsnake.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man6/nsnake.6.gz 63: warning: macro `---' not defined This man page may contain problems that can cause it not to be formatted as intended. Ignored. nsnake-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources This debuginfo package appears to contain debug symbols but no source files. This is often a sign of binaries being unexpectedly stripped too early during the build, or being compiled without compiler debug flags (which again often is a sign of distro's default compiler flags ignored which might have security consequences), or other compiler flags which result in rpmbuild's debuginfo extraction not working as expected. Verify that the binaries are not unexpectedly stripped and that the intended compiler flags are used. Fixed. These should all be fixed. You should be able to patch out the strip during build, Fixed. Also, you might consider running make dox and including the output in %doc. Sounds good but I don't know if it's really necessary. Please check if the docs directory structure is good or bad, thanks! Spec URL: http://cicku.me/nsnake.spec SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/nsnake-1.5-2.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4w0pfYKS2ra=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957529] Review Request: solaar - Device manager for Logitech Unifying Receiver
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957529 --- Comment #2 from Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi --- Ping Eric -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0Dy085Fcqja=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 872783] Review Request: Ray - Parallel genome assemblies for parallel DNA sequencing
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872783 Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #26 from Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi --- Crap, I'm terribly sorry that I totally forgot about this bug. (I did have my phd defense and so on in february.) Do feel free to ping on bugzilla or by email any time this happens to you. Anyway, you seem to have a pretty good handle on rpm packaging, so I feel quite confident sponsoring you. I'll keep an eye on your doings on bugzilla. I really recommend that you put some effort into performing package reviews, as they're the quickest way to improve the distro, and we always have a very long review queue waiting. This review is hereby APPROVED. Continue by requesting GIT branches. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=axm8nnGgdHa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 961405] Review Request: mingw-openjpeg - MinGW Windows OpenJPEG library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961405 --- Comment #14 from Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com --- Thomas, if you want me to take over f18, could you release ownership in pkgdb? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1V4Pe3IADVa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 920909] Review Request: gnome-chess - GNOME Chess game
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920909 Tanner Doshier doshi...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Flags|fedora-cvs+ | Flags||fedora-cvs? Last Closed||2013-05-12 13:03:37 --- Comment #13 from Tanner Doshier doshi...@gmail.com --- Built in rawhide and f19. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5AzPdhFUUaa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 920875] Review Request: quadrapassel - GNOME quadrapassel game
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920875 Tanner Doshier doshi...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Flags|fedora-cvs+ | Flags||fedora-cvs? Last Closed||2013-05-12 13:03:57 --- Comment #6 from Tanner Doshier doshi...@gmail.com --- Built in rawhide and f19. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Czs88G8bRya=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 920879] Review Request: tali - GNOME tali game
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920879 Tanner Doshier doshi...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Flags|fedora-review+ | Flags|fedora-cvs+ | Flags||fedora-review? Flags||fedora-cvs? Last Closed|2013-05-08 03:47:01 |2013-05-12 13:04:11 --- Comment #14 from Tanner Doshier doshi...@gmail.com --- Built in rawhide and f19. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=s9UQfBORbba=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 920875] Review Request: quadrapassel - GNOME quadrapassel game
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920875 Tanner Doshier doshi...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #7 from Tanner Doshier doshi...@gmail.com --- Messed up the cvs flag, clearing it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4VzA32VjLLa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 920879] Review Request: tali - GNOME tali game
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920879 Tanner Doshier doshi...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #15 from Tanner Doshier doshi...@gmail.com --- Messed up the cvs flag, clearing it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=9p1dbXWLZsa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 920909] Review Request: gnome-chess - GNOME Chess game
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920909 Tanner Doshier doshi...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #14 from Tanner Doshier doshi...@gmail.com --- Messed up the cvs flag, clearing it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=eDcwu1Ok0Ta=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 961405] Review Request: mingw-openjpeg - MinGW Windows OpenJPEG library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961405 --- Comment #15 from Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch --- (In reply to comment #14) Thomas, if you want me to take over f18, could you release ownership in pkgdb? Done. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HFtWFKdkKea=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962190] Review Request: kgb-bot - IRC Collaboration Bot
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962190 Mario Santagiuliana fed...@marionline.it changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fed...@marionline.it --- Comment #2 from Mario Santagiuliana fed...@marionline.it --- I don't see the license file in the source package...Could the upstream provide it? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=moR0AnHmp3a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962190] Review Request: kgb-bot - IRC Collaboration Bot
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962190 --- Comment #3 from Andrea Veri andrea.v...@gmail.com --- I'll poke them for doing so, for now we can just include a copy of the GPLv2 as SOURCE3 and have it installed on the package and on the subpackages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HVUv0Pg09ma=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 903380] Review Request: libint2 - A library for efficient evaluation of electron repulsion integrals
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903380 --- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=X4vw8McZi0a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 903380] Review Request: libint2 - A library for efficient evaluation of electron repulsion integrals
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903380 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=I2Prhy4hUra=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962190] Review Request: kgb-bot - IRC Collaboration Bot
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962190
--- Comment #4 from Mario Santagiuliana fed...@marionline.it ---
The license file can't be provide as SOURCE3, it should be include by the
upstream.
Could you use the macro (es. %{name}) when it is possible in the spec file?
Then the rpm package should be ok to be approve.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hd1SU6l2Dha=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 908088] Review Request: ascend - ASCEND modelling environment
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908088 --- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com --- 'xgraph' Requires removed. Spec URL: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/ascend/ascend.spec SRPM URL: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/ascend/ascend-0.9.8-5.fc18.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=JvoATvp5iTa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962190] Review Request: kgb-bot - IRC Collaboration Bot
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962190
--- Comment #5 from Andrea Veri andrea.v...@gmail.com ---
Ah, correct, that's actually true. I'll poke upstream to have it included for
the next upstream release. I've moved the 'kgb-bot' entries into %{name} as
requested. The URL is the same.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=KmjS9WsLIwa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858084] Review Request: mingw-qt5-qtwebkit - Qt5 for Windows - QtWebKit component
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858084 --- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl --- Updated Spec URL: http://svn.nntpgrab.nl/svn/fedora_cross/mingw-qt5-qtwebkit/mingw-qt5-qtwebkit.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://koji.vanpienbroek.nl/kojifiles/packages/mingw-qt5-qtwebkit/5.0.2/1.fc20/src/mingw-qt5-qtwebkit-5.0.2-1.fc20.src.rpm Koji scratch build: https://koji.vanpienbroek.nl/koji/buildinfo?buildID=146 * Fri May 10 2013 Erik van Pienbroek epien...@fedoraproject.org - 5.0.2-1 - Update to 5.0.2 - Added BR: flex perl-version perl-Digest-MD5 * Sun Jan 06 2013 Erik van Pienbroek epien...@fedoraproject.org - 5.0.0-1 - Update to QtWebKit 5.0.0 Final - Workaround linker failure caused by recent QWebKit/QWebKitWidgets split - Use the Qt4 unicode API as the mingw-qt5-qtbase currently doesn't use ICU - Added BR: mingw32-pkg-config mingw64-pkg-config mingw32-sqlite mingw64-sqlite - Use the bundled ANGLE libraries for now as qtwebkit depends on non-public symbols -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=OL1Nsepz98a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834747] Review Request: gps - IDE for C and Ada
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834747 Pavel Zhukov pzhu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|712332 |201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=yDXzPyZVBaa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 959926] Review Request: libyui - GUI-abstraction library
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959926
--- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com ---
Almost. ;)
* You've missed using %cmake instead of defining all the *FLAGS environment
variables yourself.
* Some reviewers demand that package submitters increase the Release value
for every update and add a %changelog entry, also during review:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FrequentlyMadeMistakes
It's good practice and makes running rpmdev-diff and rpmdiff more convenient.
* As why you've requested a hardened build, not sure:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#PIE
* Unowned directories fun:
libyui has been changed to not include /usr/share/doc/libyui-3.0.3/ -- that
directory is unowned now:
$ rpmls -p libyui-3.0.3-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm|grep ^d
drwxr-xr-x /usr/lib64/yui
drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/libyui
drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/libyui/theme
libyui-devel either needs to Requires: cmake (only for directory ownership)
OR include a %dir entry for /usr/lib64/cmake/ (the latter is permitted):
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership
If you choose to include the cmake directory in your package, be especially
careful that the file permissions are exactly the same as in the cmake package.
libyui-doc has been changed to not include the html directory:
$ rpmls -p libyui-doc-3.0.3-1.fc19.noarch.rpm|grep ^d
drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/doc/libyui-3.0.3/html/search
The following patch shall fix the directory issues. Btw, it's okay to include
full directory trees as you had done before. Example:
1)
%{_includedir}/yui/
2)
%{_includedir}/yui
3)
%dir %{_includedir}/yui
%{_includedir}/yui/*
Those three are equivalent. The Wiki _tries_ to explain it.
--- libyui.spec.orig2013-05-12 22:24:36.700740024 +0200
+++ libyui.spec2013-05-12 22:26:51.794385741 +0200
@@ -118,6 +118,7 @@
%dir %{_libdir}/yui
%dir %{_datadir}/%{name}
%dir %{_datadir}/%{name}/theme
+%dir %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}
%doc %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}/C*
@@ -126,6 +127,7 @@
%dir %{_includedir}/yui
%{_includedir}/yui/*
%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/%{name}.pc
+%dir %{_libdir}/cmake
%dir %{_libdir}/cmake/%{name}
%{_libdir}/cmake/%{name}/*
%dir %{_datadir}/%{name}/buildtools
@@ -133,7 +135,9 @@
%files doc
-%doc %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}/*/*
+%dir %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}
+%doc %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}/examples/
+%doc %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}/html/
%changelog
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=sLh9hZ1OjUa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962236] New: Review Request: f1lt - Unofficial Formula 1 live timing application
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962236 Bug ID: 962236 Summary: Review Request: f1lt - Unofficial Formula 1 live timing application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: anto.tra...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Category: --- Spec URL: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/F1LT/f1lt.spec SRPM URL: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/F1LT/f1lt-2.0.2-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: F1LT is a free unofficial Formula 1 live timing application written for Windows, Linux, Symbian and Android systems. It is an alternative application to the java applet available on the formula1.com site. To use the application you only need an account on the formula1.com site, the same you are using for connecting to Live Timing from formula1.com. Main features of the application: - gathering all live timing data - you can see lap time history of every driver - session statistics - fastest laps - fastest pit stops - speed records - charts - lap time comparison tool - allows you to compare lap times of up to 4 drivers at once - head to head tool - select two drivers and program will be calculating the gap between them, differences between lap and sector times, drawing lap, position and gap charts. The desktop version (Windows and Linux) features also: - recording and replaying live timing - every session can be recorded and replayed later, very useful tool when watching a replay of the race - session analysis tool - to analyse sessions using charts (lap times, positions, gaps) - weather charts - database with live timing session files avaialable online - session times tool - displays table with all times from a session - driver tracker - displays drivers positions on a track map and a radar - synchronizing live timing with TV coverage - gathering driver best times during the GP weekend Fedora Account System Username: sagitter Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5370222 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=P37wKv1Hvpa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962190] Review Request: kgb-bot - IRC Collaboration Bot
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962190 Mario Santagiuliana fed...@marionline.it changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fed...@marionline.it Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Mario Santagiuliana fed...@marionline.it --- I am waiting new package with the license provide by upstream. Then I will do an official review! Thank you! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=z2E9DqXHSUa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962190] Review Request: kgb-bot - IRC Collaboration Bot
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962190 Andrea Veri andrea.v...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|fed...@marionline.it|nob...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #7 from Andrea Veri andrea.v...@gmail.com --- OK, upstream has included a LICENSE file, added that. We should be good to go now. Same URL as before. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zgPiYG5xuYa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 961445] Review Request: mingw-winstorecompat - MinGW library to help porting to Windows Store
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961445
Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||manisan...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|manisan...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com ---
One observation only: should the packages be called
mingw{32,64}-winstorecompat-static, since the contents is actually a static
library?
Otherwise all ok!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1lcqgK6FzLa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962190] Review Request: kgb-bot - IRC Collaboration Bot
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962190 --- Comment #8 from Mario Santagiuliana fed...@marionline.it --- Could you fix name of package following the naming guidelines for snapshots package? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages Thank you! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=iit5ejYceFa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962190] Review Request: kgb-bot - IRC Collaboration Bot
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962190 --- Comment #9 from Andrea Veri andrea.v...@gmail.com --- Indeed, that's done: Spec: http://averi.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/kgb-bot/kgb-bot.spec SRPM: http://averi.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/kgb-bot/kgb-bot-1.26-12052013svn880.fc18.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5dfig5Rlota=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 921797] Review Request: pypolicyd-spf - SPF Policy Server for Postfix (Python implementation)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921797 --- Comment #6 from Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com --- (In reply to comment #2) Bojan, are you planning to take this to release then? If there is something I can do to help, I will. Yes, that was the idea. To be honest, I have no idea how I missed bug #606003, because I would never have opened this one if I did. Anyhow, feel free to do a package review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hP5fgK8TZta=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962190] Review Request: kgb-bot - IRC Collaboration Bot
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962190 --- Comment #10 from Andrea Veri andrea.v...@gmail.com --- Even better: year-month-day, SRPM: kgb-bot-1.26-20130512svn880.fc18.src.rpm SPEC at the same URL. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bWwEATtRDva=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 958413] Review Request: perl-CPAN-Meta-Check - Verify requirements in a CPAN::Meta object
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958413 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-CPAN-Meta-Check-0.005-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Xyybml81fBa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 958413] Review Request: perl-CPAN-Meta-Check - Verify requirements in a CPAN::Meta object
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958413 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-CPAN-Meta-Check-0.005-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=kUlEXr99kya=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962251] New: Review Request: ghc-libxml-sax - Haskell bindings for the libxml2 SAX interface
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962251 Bug ID: 962251 Summary: Review Request: ghc-libxml-sax - Haskell bindings for the libxml2 SAX interface Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dcall...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Category: --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~dcallagh/ghc-dbus/ghc-libxml-sax.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~dcallagh/ghc-dbus/ghc-libxml-sax-0.7.4-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: Haskell bindings for the libxml2 SAX interface. Fedora Account System Username: dcallagh -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=IrDtreC0K5a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962252] New: Review Request: ghc-dbus - Haskell client library for the D-Bus IPC system
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962252 Bug ID: 962252 Summary: Review Request: ghc-dbus - Haskell client library for the D-Bus IPC system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dcall...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Category: --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~dcallagh/ghc-dbus/ghc-dbus.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~dcallagh/ghc-dbus/ghc-dbus-0.10.4-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: D-Bus is a simple, message-based protocol for inter-process communication, which allows applications to interact with other parts of the machine and the user's session using remote procedure calls. This library is an implementation of the D-Bus protocol in Haskell. It can be used to add D-Bus support to Haskell applications, without the awkward interfaces common to foreign bindings. Fedora Account System Username: dcallagh -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=mfk9PK7P8Ca=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962251] Review Request: ghc-libxml-sax - Haskell bindings for the libxml2 SAX interface
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962251 Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||962252 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=DzQ5rWamSOa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962252] Review Request: ghc-dbus - Haskell client library for the D-Bus IPC system
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962252 Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||962251 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FtCg1kpWOBa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 917365] Review Request: ibus-bogo - Vietnamese engine for IBus input platform
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=917365 Daiki Ueno du...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2013-05-12 22:05:11 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=27q1Th4xc8a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 921797] Review Request: pypolicyd-spf - SPF Policy Server for Postfix (Python implementation)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921797
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
--- Comment #7 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
I've done a quick review:
Look into your special and found some problem:
1. Your Source0 use %{version} already so why not replace the %{name} like
this:
https://launchpad.net/%{name}/1.1/%{version}/+download/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
2. No need this in %install section:
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=uNY2qkPKpBa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962256] New: Review Request: zanata-client - zanata client module
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962256 Bug ID: 962256 Summary: Review Request: zanata-client - zanata client module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: pahu...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Category: --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pahuang/zanata-client.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pahuang/zanata-client-2.2.0-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Zanata client modules. Holds most of Zanata's client code, including Zanata CLI. It also contains REST stub for interacting with a Zanata server. Fedora Account System Username: pahuang -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LP4jFSNrZ6a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962256] Review Request: zanata-client - zanata client module
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962256 --- Comment #1 from Patrick Huang pahu...@redhat.com --- f19 build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5370652 f18 build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5370628 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1mhhVRYORMa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 960728] Review Request: kfs - Kosmos distributed file system (KFS)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960728 --- Comment #2 from Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com --- KFS upstream seems dead. Do you really want to maintain this package? Or switch to QFS, what you have mentioned in the specfile? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=K9dXuCXjqLa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 909797] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-httpdomain - Sphinx domain for documenting HTTP APIs
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909797 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-sphinxcontrib-httpdomain-1.1.8-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=UQcMBYNmdEa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962256] Review Request: zanata-client - zanata client module
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962256 Ding-Yi Chen dc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dc...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dc...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=cenexIe7dBa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962256] Review Request: zanata-client - zanata client module
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962256 Ding-Yi Chen dc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Ding-Yi Chen dc...@redhat.com --- Just found one issue: The license should be LGPLv2+. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=JivKMUhTQ6a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
