[Bug 963078] Review Request: ibus-rime - Rime Input Method Engine for IBus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963078 --- Comment #5 from Peng Wu p...@redhat.com --- Okay, I will fix it when importing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ozpbvAifs1a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821146] Review Request: jruby-rack - Rack adapter for JRuby and Servlet Containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821146
--- Comment #15 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #14)
(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #13)
Gil, I'm still wondering, why don't you package it just as a gem (see
comment #4). What is the point of keeping the maven stuff and -javadoc
subpackages around? They are not distributed with the gem version as far as
no this package isn't *just a gem* ...
the java library is required for build others project as sonar
what you fail to understand? when is specified that this package can be used
*only with jruby*?
I don't know. I am asking you to give me the answer and you say it is usable
even without JRuby. Then it probably makes sense to package it as you did, i.e.
to provide rubygem as a subpackage.
I understand. I would like to see this package renamed to
rubygem-jruby-rack and that is it. Is that some Java standard? Should we
clarify this with Java-SIG?
take a look here
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Pre-built_JAR_files_.
2F_Other_bundled_software
Moreover, you should install the gem into standard Fedora's gem locations
IMO, using standard gem macros. The
%{_datadir}/jruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ was never intended to be used on
Fedora. I am not sure if that location even works (but you probably tested
it, so we might want to disable it, to prevent its misuse).
repeat *only for jruby*
So you did that only for their 1.8 flavor?
No, that is not how we think we should operate. As long as I can install the
gem using plain gem install with my MRI or Rubinius, it is not JRuby only. May
be that is limitation of JRuby or RubyGems, but in that case, that should be
solved first with appropriate upstreams.
IOW if you claim that this is JRuby only rubygem, then gem install using MRI
should say to me sorry, this is only valid for JRuby and abort the
installation.
Also, I am not Java, JRuby nor Rack expert, but I would say, that you have
overspecified requires. From my POV, the gem should depend just on
ruby(rubygems) and nothing else and the reasoning is following: I have
installed MRI and I do yum install rubygem-jruby-rack. After that, I can
do:
$ irb
irb(main):001:0 p RUBY_DESCRIPTION
ruby 2.0.0p0 (2013-02-24) [x86_64-linux]
= ruby 2.0.0p0 (2013-02-24) [x86_64-linux]
irb(main):002:0 require 'jruby-rack'
= true
irb(main):003:0 p JRuby::Rack::VERSION
1.1.13.2
= 1.1.13.2
irb read also the internal jruby-rack.jar?
That was not the point obviously.
and you see, it works. It can be required. From the code, I would say that
this is design decision of upstream. So why you would force me to install
all the dependencies you have listed in the .spec file right now?
dependencies? are essentially due to the fact that *this package is not like
any other rubygem(XYZ)*
because it *contains a java library*. as a result you should also consider
the dependencies used or
required by this latest, listed in the pom file
Of course. But all this depends on answers to previous questions. You said,
that the library is usable without JRuby, then it makes sense to have the
dependencies. So no need to over-stress it here again.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=3zJuleAfqGa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 963078] Review Request: ibus-rime - Rime Input Method Engine for IBus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963078 Peng Wu p...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Peng Wu p...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ibus-rime Short Description: Rime Input Method Engine for IBus Owners: pwu Branches: f18 f19 InitialCC: i18n-team petersen -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=iqjn2XtGGoa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821146] Review Request: jruby-rack - Rack adapter for JRuby and Servlet Containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821146 --- Comment #16 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com --- (In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #15) You said, that the library is usable without JRuby, then it makes sense to have the dependencies. I should rather say the library is usable just with plain Java. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=N42JonhCL0a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957815] Review Request: edg-mkgridmap - tool to build the grid map-file from VO servers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957815 Alejandro Alvarez alejandro.alvarez.ayl...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Alejandro Alvarez alejandro.alvarez.ayl...@cern.ch --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: edg-mkgridmap Short Description: Tool to build the grid map-file from VO servers Owners: aalvarez Branches: el5 el6 f17 f18 f19 InitialCC: aalvarez -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=21pBws7WOOa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 951496] Review Request: gimplensfun - gimp plugin to correct lens distortion
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951496 --- Comment #7 from Graham White graham_al...@hotmail.com --- Spec URL: http://grahamwhiteuk.fedorapeople.org/pkgreviews/gimp-lensfun/gimp-lensfun.spec SRPM URL: http://grahamwhiteuk.fedorapeople.org/pkgreviews/gimp-lensfun/gimp-lensfun-0.2.3-1.fc18.src.rpm Successful Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5413262 Change Summary: * Bumped to official 0.2.3 build * Removed git build stuff Since building the git version (above) the 0.2.3 official release of gimp-lensfun has happened. This is an updated spec file and rebuilt srpm. Successful Koji build against rawhide instead of F18 this time. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YVHmmr1PeZa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189
--- Comment #14 from Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com ---
* fedora-review shows:
warning: bogus date in %changelog: Wed May 23 2013 Christopher Meng
r...@cicku.me - 2.18.6-1
-- Thu May 23
* in spec:
BuildRequires: lfcbase-devel%{?_isa}
BuildRequires: lfcxml-devel%{?_isa}
-- you must NOT use %{?_isa} in BuildRequires, because these will be the
Requires of the produced SRPM. SRPM must not have Requires on fixed arch. If
you have such in your specs on SCM as well, fix them, rebuild and resubmit to
obsolete older release, please.
Don't forget to add Requires: lfcbase-devel%{?_isa} to the lfcxml-devel for
reason explained/clarified in #12.
You can drop the (Build)Requires on lfcbase-devel in spec of this pkg after
fixing lfcxml, then.
* sed-magic doesn't seem to work on binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath:
cego.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/cgblow ['/usr/lib64']
cego.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/cego ['/usr/lib64']
cego.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/cgadm ['/usr/lib64']
cego.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/cglog ['/usr/lib64']
cego.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/cgclt ['/usr/lib64']
-- Consider using `chrpath` as a last resort:
BuildRequires: chrpath
after install:
for _rpbin in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/*
do
chrpath --delete ${_rpbin}
done
* sed-magic doesn't seem to work on unused-direct-shlib-dependency:
cego.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libcego.so.1.0.0
/lib64/libcrypt.so.1
cego.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libcego.so.1.0.0
/lib64/librt.so.1
cego.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libcego.so.1.0.0
/lib64/libpthread.so.0
cego.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libcego.so.1.0.0
/lib64/libnsl.so.1
cego.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libcego.so.1.0.0
/lib64/libreadline.so.6
cego.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libcego.so.1.0.0
/lib64/libhistory.so.6
cego.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libcego.so.1.0.0
/lib64/libm.so.6
cego.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libcgwrap.so.1.0.0
/lib64/libcrypt.so.1
cego.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libcgwrap.so.1.0.0
/lib64/librt.so.1
cego.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libcgwrap.so.1.0.0
/lib64/libpthread.so.0
cego.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libcgwrap.so.1.0.0
/lib64/libnsl.so.1
cego.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libcgwrap.so.1.0.0
/lib64/libncurses.so.5
cego.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libcgwrap.so.1.0.0
/lib64/libtinfo.so.5
cego.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libcgwrap.so.1.0.0
/lib64/libreadline.so.6
cego.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libcgwrap.so.1.0.0
/lib64/libhistory.so.6
cego.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libcgwrap.so.1.0.0
/lib64/liblfcxml.so.1
cego.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libcgwrap.so.1.0.0
/lib64/libm.so.6
-- There's something _really wrong_ with configure.ac and/or Makefile.am.
Are you familiar with autotool's meta-files-syntax or shall I workout a solving
patch on them? Let's discuss this on PM.
Please fix the above in spec (patch not needed instantly) and I'll give it
another shot ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Y5kYCslQgsa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865890] Review Request: concurrentlinkedhashmap-lru - A ConcurrentLinkedHashMap for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865890 --- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/concurrentlinkedhashmap-lru.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/concurrentlinkedhashmap-lru-1.3.2-1.fc18.src.rpm - update to 1.3.2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=EwAv8K9Dd0a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 956147] Review Request: wide-dhcpv6 - DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation client that works on PPP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956147 --- Comment #15 from David Beveridge d...@bevhost.com --- SPEC URL: http://repo.bevhost.com/fedora/wide-dhcpv6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.bevhost.com/fedora/wide-dhcpv6-20080615-11.1.4.fc18.src.rpm Things I know about that might affect the review = SHOULD items = Generic: [!]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [!]: Dist tag is present. [!]: Uses parallel make. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. I think everything else is ok. There is likely to be a file added to /etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d but that could be some time coming as I have found problems in NM. (It doesn't create an event when PPP comes down) So it creates the link ok, but it doesn't tear it down properly. No files needed for initscript operation, so that will be ok. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=I860njOLAAa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 859246] Review Request: cmap - Adobe pdf character mapping data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859246 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu --- I am triaging old review tickets. I can't promise a review if you reply, but by closing out the stale tickets we can devote extra attention to the ones which aren't stale. This is another one of those packages which shouldn't have sat around for so long. The only real question, I guess, is the issue of versioning, and it's kind of tricky. The individual components of the package have their own versions, but those are grouped into separate tarballs and those tarballs (which also appear to be versioned) are grouped into this package. So, the first question would be whether there is any point at all in separately packaging the tarballs? Usually we say that you should have one package per upstream tarball, especially if they are not released all on the same schedule. Judging from the list of files on the sourceforge page, that does seem to be the case, but then I have no idea how useful just one of those files would be without all of the other stuff in the package. If the best course of action is to have everything together in one package (which I'm not really sold on, honestly), then the question arises as to what version to use. I think what you've done is fine, though. You can never guarantee that the project won't release with an overall version, so you need to stick to '0' and use the releasse to order/date things. This isn't any kind of prerelease, so there's no point in using release numbers that all start with '0'. So 0-1.DATEsnap is OK. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=yecT7431x4a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 961446] Review Request: c2esp - CUPS driver for Kodak AiO printers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961446 Fridolín Pokorný fpoko...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Fridolín Pokorný fpoko...@redhat.com --- No blocker identified, package is accepted. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5KhYu6Xflua=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 963604] Review Request: python-pdfrw - Python library to read and write PDF files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963604 Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-pdfrw Short Description: Python library to read and write PDF files Owners: sergiopr Branches: f17 f18 f19 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=H9r5DD1EMea=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 924310] Review Request: mate-document-viewer - Document viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924310 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||mate-document-viewer-1.6.0- ||5.fc18 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-05-23 08:28:43 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- mate-document-viewer-1.6.0-5.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MqtZwyKKnba=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 927877] Review Request: naga - Simplified Java NIO asynchronous sockets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927877 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||jmol-13.0.15-1.fc18 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-05-23 08:30:54 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- jmol-13.0.15-1.fc18, jspecview-2-4.1169svn.fc18, naga-3.0-1.82svn.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=431Qt9fwxca=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 927879] Review Request: jspecview - JAVA applets for the display of JCAMP-DX and AnIML/CML spectral files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927879 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||jmol-13.0.15-1.fc18 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-05-23 08:30:34 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- jmol-13.0.15-1.fc18, jspecview-2-4.1169svn.fc18, naga-3.0-1.82svn.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XxEQKe6Jhsa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 961446] Review Request: c2esp - CUPS driver for Kodak AiO printers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961446 Jiri Popelka jpope...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Jiri Popelka jpope...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: c2esp Short Description: CUPS driver for Kodak AiO printers Owners: jpopelka Branches: f19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=AcFSZqtmqna=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865787] Review Request: xmlstreambuffer - XML Stream Buffer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865787 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||xmlstreambuffer-1.5.1-1.fc1 ||8 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-05-23 08:29:08 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- xmlstreambuffer-1.5.1-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=eFl8gZhFV6a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 877396] Review Request: HepMC - C++ Event Record for Monte Carlo Generators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877396 --- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se --- Ooops - somehow a . got lost in the SRPM URL. Here are the correct ones: Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/HepMC.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/HepMC-2.06.09-2.fc18.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=dk5IXDX5koa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 961446] Review Request: c2esp - CUPS driver for Kodak AiO printers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961446 Fridolín Pokorný fpoko...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fpoko...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=23Vgoei6Oea=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 870977] Review Request: glassfish-jaxws - JAX-WS Reference Implementation (RI) Project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870977 Bug 870977 depends on bug 865787, which changed state. Bug 865787 Summary: Review Request: xmlstreambuffer - XML Stream Buffer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865787 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=KCXDpE1Ik0a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957436] Review Request: lookat - A user-friendly text file viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957436 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||lookat-1.4.2-1.fc18 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-05-23 08:33:35 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- lookat-1.4.2-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=fWQaYTkZrja=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 963604] Review Request: python-pdfrw - Python library to read and write PDF files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963604 --- Comment #2 from Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com --- Thanks for the review, I have updated the spec to follow your suggestions -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7V3zkMe9oCa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 916087] Review Request: cloud-initramfs-tools - cloud image initramfs management utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916087 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- cloud-initramfs-tools-0.20-0.3.bzr85.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MrVo1MKJ33a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 966531] New: Review Request: perl-App-grindperl - Command-line tool to help build and test blead perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966531 Bug ID: 966531 Summary: Review Request: perl-App-grindperl - Command-line tool to help build and test blead perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-App-grindperl/perl-App-grindperl.spec SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-App-grindperl/perl-App-grindperl-0.001-1.fc20.src.rpm Description:Hacking on the Perl source tree requires one to regularly build and test. The grindperl tool helps automate some common configuration, build and test tasks. Fedora Account System Username: ppisar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xFrD7Fq2P8a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 915864] Review Request: oat - Attestation Service Host Agent based on OpenAttestation SDK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915864 Bug 915864 depends on bug 865787, which changed state. Bug 865787 Summary: Review Request: xmlstreambuffer - XML Stream Buffer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865787 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ulM6Ezmmf4a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 924310] Review Request: mate-document-viewer - Document viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924310 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|mate-document-viewer-1.6.0- |mate-document-viewer-1.6.0- |5.fc18 |5.fc17 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- mate-document-viewer-1.6.0-5.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=WILDnSfdEza=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957415] Review Request: lnav - A curses-based tool for viewing and analyzing log files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957415 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||lnav-0.5.1-2.fc18 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-05-23 08:41:28 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- lnav-0.5.1-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LOMHMFRfV6a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 947071] Review Request: monitorix - A free, open source, lightweight system monitoring tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947071 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=fGlfQg4yA1a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 947071] Review Request: monitorix - A free, open source, lightweight system monitoring tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947071 --- Comment #27 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=KHbnlb8uDda=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 867287] Review Request: glite-jobid-api-cpp - C++ API handling gLite jobid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867287
Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se ---
The package review only showed one failed item, which is easy to fix.
I have one question though. Since this package only installs headers
and no libraries, why not make the package noarch? The content of the
package will be the same for all achitectures, since the only
installed file is copied without changes from the source to the
installation tree during the package build.
In a noarch package you would have to remove the use of %{?_isa} and
%{_lib} since these are ambiguous for a noarch package. But nothing in
the package really depends on these macros.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
glite-jobid-api-cpp-devel requires glite-jobid-api-c-devel which owns
/usr/include/glite and /usr/include/glite/jobid.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
There is only one binary package produced - no subpackages
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
glite-jobid-api-cpp-devel owns /usr/include/glite and
/usr/include/glite/jobid which are already owned by
glite-jobid-api-c-devel on which it depends.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
= SHOULD items
[Bug 957815] Review Request: edg-mkgridmap - tool to build the grid map-file from VO servers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957815 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=c5kK3v12ila=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957815] Review Request: edg-mkgridmap - tool to build the grid map-file from VO servers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957815 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Hbv4XixPTSa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 958358] Review Request: darkhttpd - A secure, lightweight, fast, single-threaded HTTP/1.1 server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958358 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Y4nDtTKGoha=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 958358] Review Request: darkhttpd - A secure, lightweight, fast, single-threaded HTTP/1.1 server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958358 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zEVXtqrvUFa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957815] Review Request: edg-mkgridmap - tool to build the grid map-file from VO servers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957815 Alejandro Alvarez alejandro.alvarez.ayl...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |VERIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=U9lLQQkrLwa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957815] Review Request: edg-mkgridmap - tool to build the grid map-file from VO servers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957815 Alejandro Alvarez alejandro.alvarez.ayl...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|VERIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2013-05-23 08:56:11 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=rJDvCsInyha=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 961446] Review Request: c2esp - CUPS driver for Kodak AiO printers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961446 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=38Vi0sUpD8a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 961446] Review Request: c2esp - CUPS driver for Kodak AiO printers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961446 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0DgLDVVYkAa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 963078] Review Request: ibus-rime - Rime Input Method Engine for IBus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963078 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=sgaQ8WYpcja=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 963078] Review Request: ibus-rime - Rime Input Method Engine for IBus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963078 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=IVb1ezrPvUa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 963604] Review Request: python-pdfrw - Python library to read and write PDF files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963604 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=SDmDYON6UAa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 963604] Review Request: python-pdfrw - Python library to read and write PDF files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963604 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=kCJjQt4nw5a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 966630] New: Review Request: openstack-java-sdk - OpenStack Java SDK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966630 Bug ID: 966630 Summary: Review Request: openstack-java-sdk - OpenStack Java SDK Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: fsimo...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://fsimonce.fedorapeople.org/openstack-java-sdk/openstack-java-sdk.spec SRPM URL: http://fsimonce.fedorapeople.org/openstack-java-sdk/openstack-java-sdk-3.0.0-0.0.git52d4399.fc20.src.rpm Description: OpenStack client implementation in Java Fedora Account System Username: fsimonce -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=wjwZ9DAFsTa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 961446] Review Request: c2esp - CUPS driver for Kodak AiO printers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961446 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=WiTJn9onCRa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 961446] Review Request: c2esp - CUPS driver for Kodak AiO printers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961446 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- c2esp-2.6-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/c2esp-2.6-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=iIoa11cgQAa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 963136] Review Request: perl-Alien-ROOT - Utility package to install and locate CERN's ROOT library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963136 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||psab...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=wUFv7uI9DKa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 963604] Review Request: python-pdfrw - Python library to read and write PDF files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963604 Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2013-05-23 10:06:45 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=sZs3ISyG3ka=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 867287] Review Request: glite-jobid-api-cpp - C++ API handling gLite jobid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867287
--- Comment #4 from František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz ---
That's good question. I'm not sure, what will happen on multiarch systems with
the -devel dependencies without %{?_isa}, and discussions in packaging list
still recommend to use this macro:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2013-May/009136.html
On other hand using %_isa here and make the package architecture-dependent
because of it is probably too much. :-)
Any opinions? (I'll probably change it to noarch?)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=OZct1LWWqoa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 963136] Review Request: perl-Alien-ROOT - Utility package to install and locate CERN's ROOT library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963136 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com --- Ok, no issues found after all... Approving. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=WmA00vsDoZa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 883514] Review Request: inception - A fireWire physical memory manipulation tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883514 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vwdODRY2Qba=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 883514] Review Request: inception - A fireWire physical memory manipulation tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883514 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- inception-0.2.4-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/inception-0.2.4-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4uSQt9dEz1a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 883514] Review Request: inception - A fireWire physical memory manipulation tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883514 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- inception-0.2.4-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/inception-0.2.4-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bKqJLnQPgca=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 915864] Review Request: oat - Attestation Service Host Agent based on OpenAttestation SDK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915864 --- Comment #8 from Gang Wei gang@intel.com --- Spec URL: http://gwei3.fedorapeople.org/package_review/oat/v3/oat.spec SRPM URL: http://gwei3.fedorapeople.org/package_review/oat/v3/oat-1.6.0-2.fc18.src.rpm Fixed all issues pointed by Steven in last comment. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zdvNhywiFFa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 916797] Review Request: mingw-glew - MinGW OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916797 --- Comment #8 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl --- The FPC has just approved our updated packaging guidelines and have also made an addition to it: Executables which are required for proper functionality of the libraries must be packaged in the matching mingw32/mingw64 subpackage. All other executables are discouraged, but may be packaged in optional (dependent) subpackages at a packager's discretion. This situation applies to this package. The executables which are part of this package are not required for proper functionality of the library so therefore the recommended approach is to place them in subpackages. You've already done this with your -tools subpackages so this package complies with the mingw packaging guidelines now -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Z6C33jgiFIa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962190] Review Request: kgb-bot - IRC Collaboration Bot
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962190 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- kgb-bot-1.26-20130523svn880.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kgb-bot-1.26-20130523svn880.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=emKLyGRvZ9a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962190] Review Request: kgb-bot - IRC Collaboration Bot
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962190 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- kgb-bot-1.26-20130523svn880.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kgb-bot-1.26-20130523svn880.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=fmaOVMfhG8a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 966732] New: Review Request: mailman3-fedmsg-plugin - Emit fedmsg messages from mailman3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966732
Bug ID: 966732
Summary: Review Request: mailman3-fedmsg-plugin - Emit fedmsg
messages from mailman3
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
Reporter: rb...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: http://ralph.fedorapeople.org//mailman3-fedmsg-plugin.spec
SRPM URL:
http://ralph.fedorapeople.org//mailman3-fedmsg-plugin-0.1.1-1.fc18.src.rpm
Description:
Publish notifications about mails to the fedmsg bus.
Enable this by adding the following to your mailman.cfg file::
[archiver.fedmsg]
class: mailman_fedmsg_plugin.Archiver
enable: yes
You can exclude certain lists from fedmsg publication by
adding them to a 'mailman.excluded_lists' list in /etc/fedmsg.d/::
config = {
'mailman.excluded_lists': ['bugzilla', 'commits'],
}
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Akn6khHw4ba=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 966732] Review Request: mailman3-fedmsg-plugin - Emit fedmsg messages from mailman3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966732 --- Comment #1 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com --- This package built on koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5415230 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=G8sx2e5Unaa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 909797] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-httpdomain - Sphinx domain for documenting HTTP APIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909797 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-sphinxcontrib-httpdomain-1.1.8-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=3qqkW637Kga=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957800] Review Request: tegrarcm - Send code to a Tegra device in recovery mode
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957800 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2013-05-23 15:44:33 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5Mozu61hWBa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 909797] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-httpdomain - Sphinx domain for documenting HTTP APIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909797 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-sphinxcontrib-httpdomain-1.1.8-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Rx4oI8Zv1aa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 947071] Review Request: monitorix - A free, open source, lightweight system monitoring tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947071 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- monitorix-3.2.0-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vdNW0rcXaha=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 883514] Review Request: inception - A fireWire physical memory manipulation tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883514 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- inception-0.2.4-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7reCUPrK8ba=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 961446] Review Request: c2esp - CUPS driver for Kodak AiO printers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961446 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- c2esp-2.6-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FrYKHCUl08a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 859246] Review Request: cmap - Adobe pdf character mapping data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859246 --- Comment #4 from Ben Rosser rosser@gmail.com --- I think it probably could be split into separate packages- I know that python-pdfminer, the package I was working on that uses cmap, would have dependencies on only four of the tarballs. If we do that, would it make sense to have one cmap package that installs all five cmap-foo packages? (Perhaps have the others be subpackages? I'm not entirely familiar with what the right way to do something like that would be). Also, there isn't really any documentation (that I could find) other than the text and markdown file in the downloads directory, so what sort of documentation would the subpackages have? There's also the question of integrating with other packages that bundle cmap, of course. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7G7RCwkFx8a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 956931] Review Request: homerun - Application Launcher for KDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931 --- Comment #7 from Joseph Marrero jmarr...@gmail.com --- Here is the the latest version with the -libs sub package and updated to the latest 1.0.0 release. http://ece.uprm.edu/jmarrero/fedora_packaging/homerun/homerun.spec http://ece.uprm.edu/jmarrero/fedora_packaging/homerun/homerun-1.0.0-1.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=QQmgmXHj5ca=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 950281] Review Request: golang - The Go Programming Language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=950281 --- Comment #18 from Adam Goode a...@spicenitz.org --- I will split the godoc package into a binary and source package, and make godoc depend on the source package. I don't think godoc needs to require golang: it just parses the sources and runs a standalone webserver. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=OCAHI8lTUya=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 950281] Review Request: golang - The Go Programming Language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=950281 --- Comment #19 from Renich Bon Ciric ren...@woralelandia.com --- (In reply to Adam Goode from comment #16) New Package SCM Request === Package Name: golang Short Description: The Go Programming Language Owners: agoode renich Branches: f17 f18 f19 InitialCC: Should the package get renamed? There's, already, a bunch of google projects and their naming scheme is google-project $ yum list google* ... google-croscore-arimo-fonts.noarch google-croscore-cousine-fonts.noarch google-croscore-fonts-common.noarch google-croscore-symbolneu-fonts.noarch google-croscore-tinos-fonts.noarch google-droid-kufi-fonts.noarch google-droid-sans-fonts.noarch google-droid-sans-mono-fonts.noarch google-droid-serif-fonts.noarch google-gson.noarch google-talkplugin.x86_64 google-authenticator.i686 google-authenticator.x86_64 google-gson-javadoc.noarch google-guice.noarch google-guice-javadoc.noarch googlecl.noarch I'd like to propose to change this to google-go or maybe just go and gopkg-pkg (as ruby does with it's gems); since there's a plethora of sub-packages to be made: http://golang.org/pkg/ http://code.google.com/p/go-wiki/wiki/Projects (maybe?) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ZWifJ59q6ya=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 950281] Review Request: golang - The Go Programming Language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=950281 --- Comment #20 from Adam Goode a...@spicenitz.org --- Actually I will have godoc require the main package, I need the src symlink from the main package for godoc to work. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=A10kQDTVMza=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 950281] Review Request: golang - The Go Programming Language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=950281 --- Comment #21 from Adam Goode a...@spicenitz.org --- The font packages have google in the name because that is the foundry: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy The other packages have google in the name because that is the name of the upstream packages: https://code.google.com/p/google-gson/ https://code.google.com/p/google-guice/ https://code.google.com/p/google-authenticator/ https://code.google.com/p/googlecl/ I think golang is fine. go itself is not as useful a name (too generic). The website for the project is golang.org. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=N5hlf3VPrUa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 950281] Review Request: golang - The Go Programming Language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=950281 Adam Goode a...@spicenitz.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2013-05-23 22:13:14 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7vURRGr8Doa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 947071] Review Request: monitorix - A free, open source, lightweight system monitoring tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947071 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- monitorix-3.2.0-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/monitorix-3.2.0-2.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=u73S812oRHa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962820] Review Request: pngquant - PNG quantization tool for reducing image file size
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962820 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- pngquant-1.8.3-5.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pngquant-1.8.3-5.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XBUrwA67yNa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 924310] Review Request: mate-document-viewer - Document viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924310 Bug 924310 depends on bug 961992, which changed state. Bug 961992 Summary: mate-file-manager doesn't own directories correctly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961992 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=fKBHG14MHva=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962820] Review Request: pngquant - PNG quantization tool for reducing image file size
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962820 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- pngquant-1.8.3-5.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pngquant-1.8.3-5.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=DSCOlj0SLda=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962820] Review Request: pngquant - PNG quantization tool for reducing image file size
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962820 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- pngquant-1.8.3-5.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pngquant-1.8.3-5.el5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xa0yuqsV8sa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 924310] Review Request: mate-document-viewer - Document viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924310 Bug 924310 depends on bug 961950, which changed state. Bug 961950 Summary: mate-desktop doesn't own /usr/share/mate https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961950 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nFHYY3KvePa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962820] Review Request: pngquant - PNG quantization tool for reducing image file size
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962820 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- pngquant-1.8.3-5.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pngquant-1.8.3-5.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=54gJJp2d9ba=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 923564] Review Request: NetworkManager-ssh - NetworkManager VPN plugin for SSH
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923564 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=SnD7FpEXlSa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 923564] Review Request: NetworkManager-ssh - NetworkManager VPN plugin for SSH
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923564 --- Comment #41 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- NetworkManager-ssh-0.0.3-0.8.20130419git3d5321b.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/NetworkManager-ssh-0.0.3-0.8.20130419git3d5321b.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qXYBMbmzQca=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 923564] Review Request: NetworkManager-ssh - NetworkManager VPN plugin for SSH
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923564 --- Comment #42 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- NetworkManager-ssh-0.0.3-0.8.20130419git3d5321b.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/NetworkManager-ssh-0.0.3-0.8.20130419git3d5321b.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=paLf8LldQ5a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 963136] Review Request: perl-Alien-ROOT - Utility package to install and locate CERN's ROOT library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963136 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Alien-ROOT Short Description: Utility package to install and locate CERN's ROOT library Owners: ppisar jplesnik psabata Branches: InitialCC: perl-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=tUwTzgAvHla=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
