[Bug 966865] New: Review Request: perl-Storable - Persistence for Perl data structures

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966865

Bug ID: 966865
   Summary: Review Request: perl-Storable - Persistence for Perl
data structures
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Storable/perl-Storable.spec
SRPM URL:
http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Storable/perl-Storable-2.39-1.fc20.src.rpm
Description:
The Storable package brings persistence to your Perl data structures
containing scalar, array, hash or reference objects, i.e. anything that
can be conveniently stored to disk and retrieved at a later time.

Fedora Account System Username: ppisar


This package will dual-live with core modules after sub-packaging them form
perl.spec.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vByLTf9IuRa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 959672] Review Request: libndp - Library for Neighbor Discovery Protocol

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959672

Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2013-05-24 05:07:48

--- Comment #4 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz ---
imported and built, closing

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5h7CCfVzEPa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 963136] Review Request: perl-Alien-ROOT - Utility package to install and locate CERN's ROOT library

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963136

Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |
  Flags||fedora-cvs+

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=y8900eEVX5a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 963136] Review Request: perl-Alien-ROOT - Utility package to install and locate CERN's ROOT library

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963136

--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=rmpGDjDrS0a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 963136] Review Request: perl-Alien-ROOT - Utility package to install and locate CERN's ROOT library

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963136

Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.3.1-1.
   ||fc20
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2013-05-24 06:59:11

--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Thank you for the review and the repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=EFQJpGwjQIa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 963292] Review Request: perl-SOOT - Use ROOT from Perl

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963292

Bug 963292 depends on bug 963136, which changed state.

Bug 963136 Summary: Review Request: perl-Alien-ROOT - Utility package to 
install and locate CERN's ROOT library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963136

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=DiC89pbIi7a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 916797] Review Request: mingw-glew - MinGW OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916797

--- Comment #9 from Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com ---
Thanks Erik. So, we're good to go I'd say?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gkxVRXo3h1a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 962813] Review Request: funguloids - Space-Flying-Mushroom-Picking-Simulator game

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962813

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=RVB6Cjl25Ra=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 962813] Review Request: funguloids - Space-Flying-Mushroom-Picking-Simulator game

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962813

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
funguloids-1.06-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/funguloids-1.06-1.fc19

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=GMjqXetSlVa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 962813] Review Request: funguloids - Space-Flying-Mushroom-Picking-Simulator game

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962813

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
funguloids-1.06-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/funguloids-1.06-1.fc18

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bGM6xovz1wa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 966630] Review Request: openstack-java-sdk - OpenStack Java SDK

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966630

Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mizde...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=9ByYABP5Cra=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 966630] Review Request: openstack-java-sdk - OpenStack Java SDK

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966630

--- Comment #1 from Federico Simoncelli fsimo...@redhat.com ---
SRPM URL:
http://fsimonce.fedorapeople.org/openstack-java-sdk/openstack-java-sdk-3.0.0-0.0.git10597f7.fc20.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Qo9Ed5ZpT3a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959

--- Comment #12 from Veeti Paananen veeti.paana...@rojekti.fi ---
Another update to that removes now unnecessary flags from the %cmake macro and
fixes the pkgconfig file.

Spec: http://veetipaananen.fi/files/libgit2/4/libgit2.spec
SRPM: http://veetipaananen.fi/files/libgit2/4/libgit2-0.18.0-2.fc18.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=diMXF8SljWa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 966630] Review Request: openstack-java-sdk - OpenStack Java SDK

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966630

Federico Simoncelli fsimo...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #3 from Federico Simoncelli fsimo...@redhat.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: openstack-java-sdk
Short Description: OpenStack Java SDK
Owners: fsimonce
Branches: f18 f19
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=btduXXFSBAa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 883413] Review Request: java-dirq - Directory based queue

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883413

Adrien Devresse ade...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #3 from Adrien Devresse ade...@gmail.com ---
just two minor comments before the formal review :

- the directory ownership of %{_javadocdir}/%{srcname} is not set with %dir

- It's usually clearer to use one style of the macro ( $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or
%{buildroot} ) but not both if possible.


Adrien

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0RLsddxjgUa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 962160] Review Request: iipsrv - Light-weight streaming for viewing and zooming of ultra high-resolution images

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962160

Remi Collet rcol...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Attachment #752589||review?
  Flags||
 CC||rcol...@redhat.com

--- Comment #10 from Remi Collet rcol...@redhat.com ---
Created attachment 752589
  -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=752589action=edit
review.txt

Generated by fedora-review 0.4.1 (b2e211f) last change: 2013-04-29
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 962160

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=W0L2WrarjFa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 962160] Review Request: iipsrv - Light-weight streaming for viewing and zooming of ultra high-resolution images

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962160

Remi Collet rcol...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fed...@famillecollet.com
  Flags||fedora-review?

--- Comment #11 from Remi Collet rcol...@redhat.com ---
Please check attachment for comment.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=tojyUSouc0a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 883413] Review Request: java-dirq - Directory based queue

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883413

Adrien Devresse ade...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ade...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ade...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?

--- Comment #2 from Adrien Devresse ade...@gmail.com ---
I take care of this review

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=lwIASkVUK1a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 966630] Review Request: openstack-java-sdk - OpenStack Java SDK

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966630

Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |
  Flags||fedora-review+

--- Comment #2 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [-] = Not applicable


= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
 are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm  4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
 in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
 for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
 in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
 supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.

Java:
[x]: Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
 subpackage
[x]: Javadoc subpackages should not have Requires: jpackage-utils
[x]: Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink)
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build

Maven:
[x]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even
 when building with ant
[x]: Pom files have correct Maven mapping
[x]: Maven packages should use new style packaging
[x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used
[x]: Packages DOES NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-
 utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
[x]: Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x]: Packages use %{_mavenpomdir} instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
 from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try 

[Bug 966630] Review Request: openstack-java-sdk - OpenStack Java SDK

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966630

Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |
  Flags||fedora-cvs+

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=IAeaUBftQHa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 966630] Review Request: openstack-java-sdk - OpenStack Java SDK

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966630

--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7qwgoe7smfa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 956304] Review Request: fts - File Transfer Service V3

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956304

--- Comment #6 from michal.si...@cern.ch ---
Thanks again for your feedback!

In response to the issues you pointed out:

1. spelling has been fixed and lines have been wrapped
2. man pages have been added 
3. services are now disabled by default
4. the missing requirements for scriptlets have been added
5. the name of the tarball with sources has been updated

rpmlint is now silent expect 'non-standard-uid' warrning



Spec URL:
https://grid-deployment.web.cern.ch/grid-deployment/dms/fts3/epel_release/fts.spec

SRPM URL:
https://grid-deployment.web.cern.ch/grid-deployment/dms/fts3/epel_release/fts-3.0.1-1.el6.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=VN2Eq3C7ffa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 966732] Review Request: mailman3-fedmsg-plugin - Emit fedmsg messages from mailman3

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966732

Douglas Schilling Landgraf dougsl...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||dougsl...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dougsl...@redhat.com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pQrz0rYugta=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 883413] Review Request: java-dirq - Directory based queue

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883413

--- Comment #4 from Massimo Paladin massimo.pala...@gmail.com ---
Hi Adrien,

thank you for the review.

About the first point do you mean to change:
%{_javadocdir}/%{srcname}
to:
%dir %{_javadocdir}/%{srcname}
%{_javadocdir}/%{srcname}

About the second point do you mean to change $RPM_BUILD_ROOT to %{buildroot} to
have macros al with %{} notation?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=KC8sFgBkUHa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 883413] Review Request: java-dirq - Directory based queue

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883413

--- Comment #5 from Adrien Devresse ade...@gmail.com ---
Yes these are the point, they are minor. I don't see anything else at the first
iteration.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qyDdP64ZRSa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 883413] Review Request: java-dirq - Directory based queue

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883413

--- Comment #6 from Massimo Paladin massimo.pala...@gmail.com ---
Changes applied:
SPEC Url: https://mpaladin.web.cern.ch/mpaladin/rpms/java-dirq/java-dirq.spec
SRPM Url:
https://mpaladin.web.cern.ch/mpaladin/rpms/java-dirq/java-dirq-1.3-2.fc18.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=GMRES5WUeia=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 956201] Review Request: nifti2dicom - Converts 3D medical images to DICOM 2D series

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956201

--- Comment #6 from Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com ---
Updated Spec: http://fedorapeople.org/~dvratil/spec/nifti2dicom.spec
Updated SRPM:
http://fedorapeople.org/~dvratil/spec/nifti2dicom-0.4.5-4.fc18.src.rpm

- added AUTHORS, NEWS and COPYING to docs
- removed InsightToolkit-examples from BR (it was required due to packaging
issue in InsightToolkit which is fixed now), removed graphviz
- using %{_mandir}
- using .tar.gz
- rename downloaded tarball to %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
- excluded PPC and PPC64 (there's ARM build of InsightToolkit available, but I
haven't tried it)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6xs1PQtr38a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 949614] Review Request: python-v4l2 - A Python binding for the v4l2

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949614

Luis Bazan bazanlui...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Last Closed||2013-05-24 12:02:11

--- Comment #4 from Luis Bazan bazanlui...@gmail.com ---
when I have the new versions, I create new BZ!

Best Regards!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=fbLwCCoilWa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 950203] Review Request: python-xrandr - Python bindings for XRandR

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=950203

Luis Bazan bazanlui...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Last Closed||2013-05-24 12:07:37

--- Comment #3 from Luis Bazan bazanlui...@gmail.com ---
when I have the new versions, I create new BZ!

Best Regards!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7MLK7Vg2oFa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 964143] Review Request: python-testscenarios - Testscenarios, a pyunit extension for dependency injection

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964143

Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |
  Flags||fedora-review+

--- Comment #3 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
New scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5419716

$ rpmlint -i -v *
python-testscenarios.src: I: checking
python-testscenarios.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) pyunit - impunity
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

python-testscenarios.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unittest -
unit test, unit-test, unities
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

python-testscenarios.src: I: checking-url https://launchpad.net/testscenarios
(timeout 10 seconds)
python-testscenarios.src: I: checking-url
http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/t/testscenarios/testscenarios-0.4.tar.gz
(timeout 10 seconds)
python-testscenarios.noarch: I: checking
python-testscenarios.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) pyunit -
impunity
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

python-testscenarios.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unittest
- unit test, unit-test, unities
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

python-testscenarios.noarch: I: checking-url
https://launchpad.net/testscenarios (timeout 10 seconds)
python-testscenarios.spec: I: checking-url
http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/t/testscenarios/testscenarios-0.4.tar.gz
(timeout 10 seconds)
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.

Besides some ignorable spelling errors, nothing of interest.




-
key:

[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-

[+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
ASL 2.0 and BSD
[+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[.] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it
is used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream URL can be
specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to
deal with this.
sha256sum *
4f84f7fd8a6258fc00671e1521f80cb68d2fec1e2908b3ab52bcf396e198 
testscenarios-0.4.tar.gz
4f84f7fd8a6258fc00671e1521f80cb68d2fec1e2908b3ab52bcf396e198 
testscenarios-0.4.tar.gz.orig

[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line.
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for
any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
[.] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package 

[Bug 924279] Review Request: mate-character-map - Unicode character picker and font browser

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924279

Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |
  Flags||fedora-review+

--- Comment #7 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
Scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5419845

$ rpmlint -i -v *
mate-character-map.i686: I: checking
mate-character-map.i686: I: checking-url http://pub.mate-desktop.org (timeout
10 seconds)
mate-character-map.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mate-character-map
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.

mate-character-map.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mucharmap
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.

mate-character-map.src: I: checking
mate-character-map.src: I: checking-url http://pub.mate-desktop.org (timeout 10
seconds)
mate-character-map.src:10: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3,
tab: line 10)
The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic
annoyance.  Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both.

mate-character-map.src: I: checking-url
http://pub.mate-desktop.org/releases/1.6/mate-character-map-1.6.0.tar.xz
(timeout 10 seconds)
mate-character-map.x86_64: I: checking
mate-character-map.x86_64: I: checking-url http://pub.mate-desktop.org (timeout
10 seconds)
mate-character-map.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mate-character-map
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.

mate-character-map.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mucharmap
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.

mate-character-map-debuginfo.i686: I: checking
mate-character-map-debuginfo.i686: I: checking-url http://pub.mate-desktop.org
(timeout 10 seconds)
mate-character-map-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking
mate-character-map-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking-url
http://pub.mate-desktop.org (timeout 10 seconds)
mate-character-map-devel.i686: I: checking
mate-character-map-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mcharmap
- armchair
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

mate-character-map-devel.i686: I: checking-url http://pub.mate-desktop.org
(timeout 10 seconds)
mate-character-map-devel.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.

mate-character-map-devel.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/include/mucharmap-2.0/mucharmap/mucharmap.h
The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or
misspelled.  Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file,
possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF.

mate-character-map-devel.x86_64: I: checking
mate-character-map-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
mcharmap - armchair
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

mate-character-map-devel.x86_64: I: checking-url http://pub.mate-desktop.org
(timeout 10 seconds)
mate-character-map-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.

mate-character-map-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/include/mucharmap-2.0/mucharmap/mucharmap.h
The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or
misspelled.  Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file,
possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF.

mate-character-map.spec:10: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3,
tab: line 10)
The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic
annoyance.  Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both.

mate-character-map.spec: I: checking-url
http://pub.mate-desktop.org/releases/1.6/mate-character-map-1.6.0.tar.xz
(timeout 10 seconds)
7 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 10 warnings.


Don't bother with incorrect FSF addresses, just file a bug upstream. The one
and only considerable problem is the mixed use of spaces and tabs in your spec.
Please fix this before you upload the srpm into the Git repo.


-
key:

[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-

[+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The License 

[Bug 966732] Review Request: mailman3-fedmsg-plugin - Emit fedmsg messages from mailman3

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966732

Douglas Schilling Landgraf dougsl...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-review+

--- Comment #2 from Douglas Schilling Landgraf dougsl...@redhat.com ---
Review based on fedora-review tool and manual steps.

[OK] MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.

Rpmlint
---
Checking: mailman3-fedmsg-plugin-0.1.1-1.fc18.noarch.rpm
mailman3-fedmsg-plugin.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cfg -
cf, cg, cog
mailman3-fedmsg-plugin.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US archiver
- archive, archives, archived
mailman3-fedmsg-plugin.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Archiver
- Archive, Archives, Archived
mailman3-fedmsg-plugin.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US config
- con fig, con-fig, configure
mailman3-fedmsg-plugin.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bugzilla
- Bugzilla
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.


Rpmlint (installed packages)

# rpmlint mailman3-fedmsg-plugin
mailman3-fedmsg-plugin.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cfg -
cf, cg, cog
mailman3-fedmsg-plugin.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US archiver
- archive, archives, archived
mailman3-fedmsg-plugin.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Archiver
- Archive, Archives, Archived
mailman3-fedmsg-plugin.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US config
- con fig, con-fig, configure
mailman3-fedmsg-plugin.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bugzilla
- Bugzilla

Above warnings can be ignored.

[OK] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines 

[OK] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the
format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. 

[OK] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines

[OK] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines

[OK] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.

[OK] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.

[OK] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.

[OK] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. 

[OK] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this
task as it is used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream
URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for
how to deal with this.

Source checksums

http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/m/mailman3-fedmsg-plugin/mailman3-fedmsg-plugin-0.1.1.tar.gz
:
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
c7dde6ff19603308a9fa0bd44bd1e06af8c3e3b01868ec456c88e86e89c2f783
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
c7dde6ff19603308a9fa0bd44bd1e06af8c3e3b01868ec456c88e86e89c2f783

[OK] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture. 

[OK] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for
any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.

[OK] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries

[OK] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory. [13]

[OK] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific
situations)

[OK] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. [

[OK] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.

[OK] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must
run properly if it is not present. 

[OK] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed
should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This
means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with
any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you
feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another
package owns, then please present that at package review time. [23]

[OK] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be 

[Bug 915005] Review Request: qt5-qttools - Qt5 - QtTool components

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915005

Panos Polychronis panospolychro...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||panospolychro...@gmail.com

--- Comment #22 from Panos Polychronis panospolychro...@gmail.com ---
last lines from rpmbuild (qt5-qttools-5.0.2-3.fc18.src.rpm @ fedora 19)
output 
g++ -c -m64 -pipe -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -O2 -fno-exceptions -Wall -W
-D_REENTRANT -fPIE -DQT_NO_LIBUDEV -DQT_NO_CAST_FROM_ASCII
-DQT_NO_CAST_TO_ASCII -DQFORMINTERNAL_NAMESPACE -DQT_KEYWORDS
-DQT_NO_EXCEPTIONS -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -DQT_NO_DEBUG
-DQT_PRINTSUPPORT_LIB -DQT_WIDGETS_LIB -DQT_UITOOLS_LIB -DQT_XML_LIB
-DQT_GUI_LIB -DQT_CORE_LIB -I/usr/lib64/qt5/mkspecs/linux-g++-64 -I.
-I../shared -I/usr/include/qt5 -I/usr/include/qt5/QtPrintSupport
-I/usr/include/qt5/QtWidgets -I../../../include -I../../../include/QtUiTools
-I../../../include/QtUiTools/5.0.2 -I../../../include/QtUiTools/5.0.2/QtUiTools
-I/usr/include/qt5/QtXml -I/usr/include/qt5/QtGui -I/usr/include/qt5/QtCore
-I/usr/include/qt5/QtCore/5.0.2 -I/usr/include/qt5/QtCore/5.0.2/QtCore
-I.moc/release-shared -I.uic/release-shared -o
.obj/release-shared/moc_translatedialog.o
.moc/release-shared/moc_translatedialog.cpp
g++ -c -m64 -pipe -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -O2 -fno-exceptions -Wall -W
-D_REENTRANT -fPIE -DQT_NO_LIBUDEV -DQT_NO_CAST_FROM_ASCII
-DQT_NO_CAST_TO_ASCII -DQFORMINTERNAL_NAMESPACE -DQT_KEYWORDS
-DQT_NO_EXCEPTIONS -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -DQT_NO_DEBUG
-DQT_PRINTSUPPORT_LIB -DQT_WIDGETS_LIB -DQT_UITOOLS_LIB -DQT_XML_LIB
-DQT_GUI_LIB -DQT_CORE_LIB -I/usr/lib64/qt5/mkspecs/linux-g++-64 -I.
-I../shared -I/usr/include/qt5 -I/usr/include/qt5/QtPrintSupport
-I/usr/include/qt5/QtWidgets -I../../../include -I../../../include/QtUiTools
-I../../../include/QtUiTools/5.0.2 -I../../../include/QtUiTools/5.0.2/QtUiTools
-I/usr/include/qt5/QtXml -I/usr/include/qt5/QtGui -I/usr/include/qt5/QtCore
-I/usr/include/qt5/QtCore/5.0.2 -I/usr/include/qt5/QtCore/5.0.2/QtCore
-I.moc/release-shared -I.uic/release-shared -o
.obj/release-shared/moc_translationsettingsdialog.o
.moc/release-shared/moc_translationsettingsdialog.cpp
g++ -m64 -Wl,-O1 -Wl,-z,relro -o ../../../bin/linguist
.obj/release-shared/numerus.o .obj/release-shared/translator.o
.obj/release-shared/translatormessage.o .obj/release-shared/qm.o
.obj/release-shared/qph.o .obj/release-shared/po.o .obj/release-shared/ts.o
.obj/release-shared/xliff.o .obj/release-shared/batchtranslationdialog.o
.obj/release-shared/errorsview.o .obj/release-shared/finddialog.o
.obj/release-shared/formpreviewview.o .obj/release-shared/globals.o
.obj/release-shared/main.o .obj/release-shared/mainwindow.o
.obj/release-shared/messageeditor.o .obj/release-shared/messageeditorwidgets.o
.obj/release-shared/messagehighlighter.o .obj/release-shared/messagemodel.o
.obj/release-shared/phrasebookbox.o .obj/release-shared/phrase.o
.obj/release-shared/phrasemodel.o .obj/release-shared/phraseview.o
.obj/release-shared/printout.o .obj/release-shared/recentfiles.o
.obj/release-shared/sourcecodeview.o .obj/release-shared/statistics.o
.obj/release-shared/translatedialog.o
.obj/release-shared/translationsettingsdialog.o .obj/release-shared/simtexth.o
.obj/release-shared/qrc_linguist.o
.obj/release-shared/moc_batchtranslationdialog.o
.obj/release-shared/moc_errorsview.o .obj/release-shared/moc_finddialog.o
.obj/release-shared/moc_formpreviewview.o .obj/release-shared/moc_mainwindow.o
.obj/release-shared/moc_messageeditor.o
.obj/release-shared/moc_messageeditorwidgets.o
.obj/release-shared/moc_messagehighlighter.o
.obj/release-shared/moc_messagemodel.o .obj/release-shared/moc_phrasebookbox.o
.obj/release-shared/moc_phrase.o .obj/release-shared/moc_phrasemodel.o
.obj/release-shared/moc_phraseview.o .obj/release-shared/moc_recentfiles.o
.obj/release-shared/moc_sourcecodeview.o .obj/release-shared/moc_statistics.o
.obj/release-shared/moc_translatedialog.o
.obj/release-shared/moc_translationsettingsdialog.o   -L/usr/X11R6/lib64
-lQt5PrintSupport -L/root/rpmbuild/BUILD/qttools-opensource-src-5.0.2/lib
-lQt5UiTools -lQt5Widgets -lQt5Xml -lQt5Gui -lQt5Core -lGL -lpthread 
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/root/rpmbuild/BUILD/qttools-opensource-src-5.0.2/src/linguist/linguist'
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/root/rpmbuild/BUILD/qttools-opensource-src-5.0.2/src/linguist'
make[1]: *** [sub-linguist-make_first-ordered] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/root/rpmbuild/BUILD/qttools-opensource-src-5.0.2/src'
make: *** [sub-src-make_first] Error 2
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Dj8qER (%build)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this 

[Bug 871021] Review Request: glassfish-ha-api - High Availability APIs and SPI

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871021

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=li8DjGeeRJa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 871021] Review Request: glassfish-ha-api - High Availability APIs and SPI

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871021

--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
glassfish-ha-api-3.1.9-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glassfish-ha-api-3.1.9-1.fc19

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nuMMbZgiQea=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 915005] Review Request: qt5-qttools - Qt5 - QtTool components

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915005

--- Comment #23 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
Hard to say, builds ok in mock for me:

http://kdeforge.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/mock/fedora-18-x86_64-kde/qt5-qttools/

once we get all it's dependencies reviewed, we can do official koji (scratch)
builds too for review purposes.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nTGzmlOsjsa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 961048] Review Request: codemod - A tool to assist with large codebase refactors

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961048

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|codemod-1.0-1.20130508gitea |codemod-1.0-1.20130508gitea
   |c2165.fc18  |c2165.el6

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
codemod-1.0-1.20130508giteac2165.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6
stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MvsTETRW3ta=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 961912] Review Request: rubygem-mongoid - Elegant Persistance in Ruby for MongoDB

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961912

Andy Grimm agr...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||agr...@redhat.com
 QA Contact|extras...@fedoraproject.org |agr...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=dZdokdEthna=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 865890] Review Request: concurrentlinkedhashmap-lru - A ConcurrentLinkedHashMap for Java

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865890

Douglas Schilling Landgraf dougsl...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||dougsl...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dougsl...@redhat.com

--- Comment #2 from Douglas Schilling Landgraf dougsl...@redhat.com ---
Hi Gil,

Please check my comments below:

- Maven packages should use new style packaging
  Note: If possible update your package to latest guidelines
  See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Apache_Maven

- Please do not include license into Source01
Source1:   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt

Here suggestions how you can deal with this situation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/LicensingGuidelines



Thanks
Douglas

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=QKQcQaBDfka=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 928841] Review Request: drupal7-theme-zen - Zen is a powerful, yet simple, HTML5 starting theme

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928841

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|drupal7-theme-zen-5.1-3.fc1 |drupal7-theme-zen-5.1-3.el6
   |7   |

--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
drupal7-theme-zen-5.1-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=trUwYGYXcha=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 925971] Review Request: drupal6-prepopulate - Allows form elements to be pre-populated from the URL

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925971

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|drupal6-prepopulate-2.2-1.f |drupal6-prepopulate-2.2-1.e
   |c17 |l6

--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
drupal6-prepopulate-2.2-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=J3fjv818ZPa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 925971] Review Request: drupal6-prepopulate - Allows form elements to be pre-populated from the URL

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925971

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|drupal6-prepopulate-2.2-1.e |drupal6-prepopulate-2.2-1.e
   |l6  |l5

--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
drupal6-prepopulate-2.2-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=t17i9P7FJCa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 928841] Review Request: drupal7-theme-zen - Zen is a powerful, yet simple, HTML5 starting theme

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928841

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|drupal7-theme-zen-5.1-3.el6 |drupal7-theme-zen-5.1-3.el5

--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
drupal7-theme-zen-5.1-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ydU5ZgELqTa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 821283] Review Request: gsbase - A collection of java utility classes

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821283

--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/gsbase.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/gsbase-2.0.1-1.fc18.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=71enzuw83Ca=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 923564] Review Request: NetworkManager-ssh - NetworkManager VPN plugin for SSH

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923564

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #43 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
NetworkManager-ssh-0.0.3-0.8.20130419git3d5321b.fc19 has been pushed to the
Fedora 19 testing repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YCCTDJSWMUa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 962813] Review Request: funguloids - Space-Flying-Mushroom-Picking-Simulator game

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962813

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
funguloids-1.06-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=sgsvBlG58Za=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 865890] Review Request: concurrentlinkedhashmap-lru - A ConcurrentLinkedHashMap for Java

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865890

--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
hi

(In reply to Douglas Schilling Landgraf from comment #2)
 Hi Gil,
 
 Please check my comments below:
 
 - Maven packages should use new style packaging
   Note: If possible update your package to latest guidelines
   See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Apache_Maven
for no use F18 and xmvn binary isnt available
 
 - Please do not include license into Source01
 Source1:   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
 
 Here suggestions how you can deal with this situation:
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/
 LicensingGuidelines
see http://code.google.com/p/concurrentlinkedhashmap/issues/detail?id=38
 
 
 
 Thanks
 Douglas
regards

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=DDWVurNE2Ya=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 924279] Review Request: mate-character-map - Unicode character picker and font browser

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924279

Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #8 from Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de ---
Thank you Mario for the review.
I will fix the rest before i upload to fed git.
The incorrect FSF addresses is already fixed in upstream.

New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: mate-character-map
Short Description: Unicode character picker and font browser
Owners: raveit65
Branches: f17 f18 f19
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=RAVTeiNESxa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 865890] Review Request: concurrentlinkedhashmap-lru - A ConcurrentLinkedHashMap for Java

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865890

--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #3)
 hi
 
 (In reply to Douglas Schilling Landgraf from comment #2)
  Hi Gil,
  
  Please check my comments below:
  
  - Maven packages should use new style packaging
Note: If possible update your package to latest guidelines
See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Apache_Maven
 for no use F18 and xmvn binary isnt available
for now i use F18 and xmvn binary isnt available

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=9y1iKHgh0Ja=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 956201] Review Request: nifti2dicom - Converts 3D medical images to DICOM 2D series

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956201

Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |
  Flags||fedora-review+

--- Comment #7 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at ---
Fails to build in Rawhide: Various gdcm headers are not found

Otherwise it's good to go. I trust you'll take care of that and therefore
APPROVE the packge.

Some details you could improve:

- Use the name macro on Patch0
- Comment about the status of that ITK linking issue upstream

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=dRih6Q2QWGa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 916797] Review Request: mingw-glew - MinGW OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916797

--- Comment #10 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl ---
Your latest srpm gives me a 404

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NLTqpWzDcCa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 916797] Review Request: mingw-glew - MinGW OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916797

Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=QRxvwzdIl0a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 927879] Review Request: jspecview - JAVA applets for the display of JCAMP-DX and AnIML/CML spectral files

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927879

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|jmol-13.0.15-1.fc18 |jmol-13.0.15-1.fc19

--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
jmol-13.0.15-1.fc19, jspecview-2-4.1169svn.fc19, naga-3.0-1.82svn.fc19 has been
pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5XCDwq9NRBa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 927877] Review Request: naga - Simplified Java NIO asynchronous sockets

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927877

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|jmol-13.0.15-1.fc18 |jmol-13.0.15-1.fc19

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
jmol-13.0.15-1.fc19, jspecview-2-4.1169svn.fc19, naga-3.0-1.82svn.fc19 has been
pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=SqaXshzfv1a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 953783] Review Request: vim-taglist - The Tag List plugin is a source code browser plugin for Vim

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953783

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2013-05-24 16:21:11

--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
vim-taglist-4.6-5.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ZNwbrskpWEa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 836945] Review Request: java-xmlbuilder - XML Builder Java library for creating XML documents

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||java-xmlbuilder-0.6-1.fc19
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2013-05-24 16:21:22

--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
java-xmlbuilder-0.6-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=mxMz8wbUOYa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 847109] Review Request: jets3t - Java interface to Amazon S3 and CloudFront services

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847109

Bug 847109 depends on bug 836945, which changed state.

Bug 836945 Summary: Review Request: java-xmlbuilder - XML Builder Java library 
for creating XML documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=eQqIVKn3JPa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 924310] Review Request: mate-document-viewer - Document viewer

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924310

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|mate-document-viewer-1.6.0- |mate-document-viewer-1.6.0-
   |5.fc17  |5.fc19

--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
mate-document-viewer-1.6.0-5.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CG88HjcDW7a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 907501] Review Request: sidc-gui - Sudden ionospheric disturbance collector (sidc) GUI

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907501

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||sidc-gui-0.4-2.fc19
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2013-05-24 16:33:04

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
sidc-gui-0.4-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=oMrcYEeJAfa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 957415] Review Request: lnav - A curses-based tool for viewing and analyzing log files

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957415

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|lnav-0.5.1-2.fc18   |lnav-0.5.1-2.fc19

--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
lnav-0.5.1-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Z4uhNKSXjBa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 955913] Review Request: nsnake - Classic snake game on console

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=955913

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||nsnake-1.7-2.fc19
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2013-05-24 16:34:37

--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nsnake-1.7-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2dR3A7OQWoa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 953885] Review Request: vim-jedi - awesome Python autocompletion with VIM

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953885

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2013-05-24 16:37:23

--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
vim-jedi-0.5.0-5.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Q3EBDXxDZpa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 959172] Review Request: python-django-post_office - Allows you to log email activities and send mail asynchronously, complete with template support.

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959172

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|python-django-post_office-0 |python-django-post_office-0
   |.3.1-3.fc17 |.3.1-2.fc19

--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-django-post_office-0.3.1-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=GWbN37gUrea=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 916432] Review Request: python-geojson - Encoder/decoder for simple GIS features

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916432

--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-geojson-1.0.1-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vj9chTeJADa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 886846] Review Request: native-platform - Java bindings for various native APIs

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886846

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|native-platform-0.3-0.2.rc2 |native-platform-0.3-0.2.rc2
   |.fc18   |.fc19

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
native-platform-0.3-0.2.rc2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ufRgdPzkefa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 957568] Review Request: python-carddav - Python CardDAV client compatible with mutt

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957568

--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-carddav-0.4.1-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Esd27Yg0MMa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 821224] tntnet - A web application server for web applications

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821224

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||tntnet-2.2-3.fc19

--- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
tntnet-2.2-3.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=mwrTiytTW9a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 952141] Review Request: python-mccabe - McCabe complexity checker

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952141

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||python-mccabe-0.2.1-2.fc19
 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA

--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-mccabe-0.2.1-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XwZenQoe6xa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 917388] Review Request: zopfli - Zlib compatible better compressor

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=917388

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||zopfli-1.0.0-1.fc19
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2013-05-24 16:50:12

--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
zopfli-1.0.0-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=navmwm8PXCa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 967133] New: Review Request: drupal7-domain_views - Provides Views integration for Domain Access

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967133

Bug ID: 967133
   Summary: Review Request: drupal7-domain_views - Provides Views
integration for Domain Access
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: shawn.iwin...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

Spec URL:
http://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SPECS/drupal7-domain_views.spec

SRPM URL:
http://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SRPMS/drupal7-domain_views-1.5-1.fc18.src.rpm

Description: Provides Views integration for Domain Access.


Fedora Account System Username: siwinski

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=smv2aZOGXsa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 967133] Review Request: drupal7-domain_views - Provides Views integration for Domain Access

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967133

Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||959645 (drupal7-domain)
  Alias||drupal7-domain_views

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=TZoHbcMD9ma=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 959645] Review Request: drupal7-domain - A domain-based access control system

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959645

Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
   |project.org |
 Blocks||967133
   ||(drupal7-domain_views)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=3eJXnOswpfa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 804125] Review Request: rdkit - A toolkit for cheminformatics and machine learning

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125

Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||gia...@gmail.com
  Flags||needinfo?(gia...@gmail.com)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Wfk1jTwUhaa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 916797] Review Request: mingw-glew - MinGW OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916797

--- Comment #11 from Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/mingw-glew.spec
SRPM URL: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/mingw-glew-1.9.0-4.fc20.src.rpm

Uh, sorry about that - fixed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=yYYkfxp1uya=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 966732] Review Request: mailman3-fedmsg-plugin - Emit fedmsg messages from mailman3

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966732

Douglas Schilling Landgraf dougsl...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CBtDYQrAGRa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 962160] Review Request: iipsrv - Light-weight streaming for viewing and zooming of ultra high-resolution images

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962160

--- Comment #12 from Johan Cwiklinski jo...@x-tnd.be ---
Thank you for taking the review :)

I've fixed the issues you've pointed out in the review.txt file. I've also
changed mod_fcgid directives names, except for EL-5 since the shipped version
of mod_fcgid is still the pre ASF one (see
http://httpd.apache.org/mod_fcgid/mod/mod_fcgid.html#upgrade).

Here is the new version:
Spec URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/iipsrv/iipsrv.spec
SRPM URL:
http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/iipsrv/iipsrv-1.0.0-0.7.git0b63de7.fc18.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bs4cWpBjKVa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 870977] Review Request: glassfish-jaxws - JAX-WS Reference Implementation (RI) Project

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870977

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
glassfish-jaxws-2.2.7-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glassfish-jaxws-2.2.7-1.fc19

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=rqYr5xROuGa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 870977] Review Request: glassfish-jaxws - JAX-WS Reference Implementation (RI) Project

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870977

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=lj13cmX1xBa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 924279] Review Request: mate-character-map - Unicode character picker and font browser

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924279

--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Y0UKDz3O11a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 924279] Review Request: mate-character-map - Unicode character picker and font browser

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924279

Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |
  Flags||fedora-cvs+

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2ZdLi1Q8ZZa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 865890] Review Request: concurrentlinkedhashmap-lru - A ConcurrentLinkedHashMap for Java

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865890

Douglas Schilling Landgraf dougsl...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #5 from Douglas Schilling Landgraf dougsl...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #3)
 hi
 
 (In reply to Douglas Schilling Landgraf from comment #2)
  Hi Gil,
  
  Please check my comments below:
  
  - Maven packages should use new style packaging
Note: If possible update your package to latest guidelines
See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Apache_Maven
 for no use F18 and xmvn binary isnt available
  
  - Please do not include license into Source01
  Source1:   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
  
  Here suggestions how you can deal with this situation:
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/
  LicensingGuidelines
 see http://code.google.com/p/concurrentlinkedhashmap/issues/detail?id=38
  

It's not required to include the license but nice that you have followed the
instructions and notified the project.

Please update your spec removing the Source1 which includes the license and
include (or not) the LICENSE file into it.

Thanks
Douglas

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=EWfPnDXtW1a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 865890] Review Request: concurrentlinkedhashmap-lru - A ConcurrentLinkedHashMap for Java

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865890

--- Comment #6 from Douglas Schilling Landgraf dougsl...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #4)
 (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #3)
  hi
  
  (In reply to Douglas Schilling Landgraf from comment #2)
   Hi Gil,
   
   Please check my comments below:
   
   - Maven packages should use new style packaging
 Note: If possible update your package to latest guidelines
 See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Apache_Maven
  for no use F18 and xmvn binary isnt available
 for now i use F18 and xmvn binary isnt available

Thanks for the check.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NKRQJmCwwOa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 967153] New: Review Request: phrel - Per Host RatE Limiter

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967153

Bug ID: 967153
   Summary: Review Request: phrel - Per Host RatE Limiter
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: cicku...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

Spec URL: http://cicku.me/phrel.spec
SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/phrel-1.0.1-1.fc20.src.rpm
Description: PHREL is a Per Host RatE Limiter written in C to efficiently track
the rate 
of incoming traffic on a per host basis and insert a chain into iptables when 
a configured threshold is crossed. The inserted chain may either rate limit 
or completely block the offending host for a period of time and will be 
automatically removed when the offending host's traffic levels return to 
normal. PHREL can be used with any type of traffic, but it is particularly 
well suited to protecting name servers from random hosts that flood DNS 
requests and preventing SSH brute force login attempts.

PHREL now supports IPv6 and syncronization between instances of PHREL via a 
MySQL database. The syncronization feature is designed to work in load 
balanced server farm environments or to simply provide database access to the 
hosts that PHREL is currently monitoring.
Fedora Account System Username: cicku

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ckMy5PIqNoa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 967153] Review Request: phrel - Per Host RatE Limiter

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967153

Douglas Schilling Landgraf dougsl...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||dougsl...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dougsl...@redhat.com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5KOM9gHD8Ha=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 963078] Review Request: ibus-rime - Rime Input Method Engine for IBus

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963078

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=BVyATIl1IFa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 963077] Review Request: brise - The official Rime schema repository

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963077

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=RxlV8NGmvga=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 963074] Review Request: librime - Rime Input Method Engine Library

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963074

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=dqqfU5AoMZa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 963078] Review Request: ibus-rime - Rime Input Method Engine for IBus

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963078

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
ibus-rime-0.9.9-2.fc18,brise-0.22-2.fc18,librime-0.9.8-2.fc18 has been
submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibus-rime-0.9.9-2.fc18,brise-0.22-2.fc18,librime-0.9.8-2.fc18

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LQbszlZUqGa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 963077] Review Request: brise - The official Rime schema repository

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963077

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
ibus-rime-0.9.9-2.fc18,brise-0.22-2.fc18,librime-0.9.8-2.fc18 has been
submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibus-rime-0.9.9-2.fc18,brise-0.22-2.fc18,librime-0.9.8-2.fc18

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=tYGD5oo6pza=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 963074] Review Request: librime - Rime Input Method Engine Library

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963074

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
ibus-rime-0.9.9-2.fc18,brise-0.22-2.fc18,librime-0.9.8-2.fc18 has been
submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibus-rime-0.9.9-2.fc18,brise-0.22-2.fc18,librime-0.9.8-2.fc18

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zuvdX48pTDa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 963078] Review Request: ibus-rime - Rime Input Method Engine for IBus

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963078

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
ibus-rime-0.9.9-2.fc19,brise-0.22-2.fc19,librime-0.9.8-2.fc19 has been
submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibus-rime-0.9.9-2.fc19,brise-0.22-2.fc19,librime-0.9.8-2.fc19

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=9CKJGj1iU7a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 963074] Review Request: librime - Rime Input Method Engine Library

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963074

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
ibus-rime-0.9.9-2.fc19,brise-0.22-2.fc19,librime-0.9.8-2.fc19 has been
submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibus-rime-0.9.9-2.fc19,brise-0.22-2.fc19,librime-0.9.8-2.fc19

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=kY0DWUhPaCa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 963077] Review Request: brise - The official Rime schema repository

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963077

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
ibus-rime-0.9.9-2.fc19,brise-0.22-2.fc19,librime-0.9.8-2.fc19 has been
submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibus-rime-0.9.9-2.fc19,brise-0.22-2.fc19,librime-0.9.8-2.fc19

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=WYQ36fb7XFa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 961141] Review Request: debhelper - Helper programs for debian/rules

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961141

--- Comment #33 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ser...@serjux.com ---
Hi,
Since we already got debconf, po-debconf and dpkg on testings, you may build
debhelper for F19 , I tested with dh-make :)

we just need do:
cd dh-make
fedpkg switch-branch f19
git merge master
fedpkg push
fedpkg build
fedpkg update (please indicate this bug) 

Thanks,

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gYJ6rkytVQa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 865890] Review Request: concurrentlinkedhashmap-lru - A ConcurrentLinkedHashMap for Java

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865890

--- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/concurrentlinkedhashmap-lru.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/concurrentlinkedhashmap-lru-1.3.2-1.fc18.src.rpm

- removed SOURCE1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=KFHTI7dzgSa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 865890] Review Request: concurrentlinkedhashmap-lru - A ConcurrentLinkedHashMap for Java

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865890

--- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
concurrentlinkedhashmap-lru is a Build/requires for Apache Camel

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=UFeKM6Mu9Xa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review