[Bug 969812] Review Request: hg-git - Mercurial Plugin for Communicating with Git Servers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969812 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||hg-git-0.4.0-1.fc18 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-06-16 01:42:27 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- hg-git-0.4.0-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Q6kRJMJy36a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 927421] Review Request: python-firehose - Library for working with output from static code analyzers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927421 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|python-firehose-0.2-3.fc17 |python-firehose-0.2-3.fc18 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-firehose-0.2-3.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Cmi2gzfyzCa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 949324] Review Request: oath-toolkit - One-time password components
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949324 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|oath-toolkit-2.0.2-3.fc19 |oath-toolkit-2.0.2-3.fc18 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- oath-toolkit-2.0.2-3.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bf460FRXY7a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 973904] Review Request: libserf - High-Performance Asynchronous HTTP Client Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973904 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ | Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- Package Change Request == Package Name: libserf New Branches: el6 Owners: cicku -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=KgQR0kYU1Qa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 896310] Review Request: odeint - A C++ library for numerically solving Ordinary Differential Equations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896310 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||odeint-2.2-3.fc18 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-06-16 01:43:10 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- odeint-2.2-3.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=19fupoDw3Ua=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 969703] Review Request: python-openid-cla - CLA extension for python-openid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969703 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|python-openid-cla-1.0-1.fc1 |python-openid-cla-1.0-1.fc1 |9 |8 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-openid-cla-1.0-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0BlurbOTjra=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 840437] Review Request: sugar-xoeditor - editor for xo icon colors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840437 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||sugar-xoeditor-11-2.fc19 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed|2013-06-03 13:32:04 |2013-06-16 02:06:18 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- sugar-xoeditor-11-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=oca8Zg8dhCa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 969812] Review Request: hg-git - Mercurial Plugin for Communicating with Git Servers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969812 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|hg-git-0.4.0-1.fc18 |hg-git-0.4.0-1.fc19 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- hg-git-0.4.0-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=A4FOo6KZyna=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 842101] Review Request: sugar-yupana - A counting and calculating device used by the Incan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842101 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||sugar-yupana-15-1.fc19 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-06-16 02:10:32 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- sugar-yupana-15-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=31x53rlIQja=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 841239] Review Request: sugar-story - an activity that uses images to prompt the learner to tell stories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841239 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||sugar-story-9-6.fc19 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-06-16 02:11:12 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- sugar-story-9-6.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=RBXRtD9oTma=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 891295] Review Request: enlightenment - The window manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891295 Bug 891295 depends on bug 890769, which changed state. Bug 890769 Summary: Review Request: embryo - Small Pawn based virtual machine and compiler. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890769 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=rST8w44UP2a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890771] Review Request: edje - Abstract GUI layout and animation object library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890771 Bug 890771 depends on bug 890769, which changed state. Bug 890769 Summary: Review Request: embryo - Small Pawn based virtual machine and compiler. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890769 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Cc0F5jdvRHa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 891282] Review Request: elementary - Basic widget set that is easy to use based on EFL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891282 Bug 891282 depends on bug 890769, which changed state. Bug 890769 Summary: Review Request: embryo - Small Pawn based virtual machine and compiler. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890769 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=rJWFKEngoma=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 890769] Review Request: embryo - Small Pawn based virtual machine and compiler.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890769 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||embryo-1.7.6-1.fc19 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-06-16 02:12:34 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- embryo-1.7.6-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=X94iondS6Qa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 974818] New: Review Request: php-pecl-propro - Property proxy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974818 Bug ID: 974818 Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-propro - Property proxy Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: fed...@famillecollet.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/remicollet/remirepo/master/php/pecl/php-pecl-propro/php-pecl-propro.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/php-pecl-propro-0.1.0-1.remi.src.rpm Description: A reusable split-off of pecl_http's property proxy API. Fedora Account System Username: remi -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=D95w063CCUa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 974819] New: Review Request: php-pecl-raphf - Resource and persistent handles factory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974819 Bug ID: 974819 Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-raphf - Resource and persistent handles factory Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: fed...@famillecollet.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/remicollet/remirepo/master/php/pecl/php-pecl-raphf/php-pecl-raphf.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/php-pecl-raphf-0.1.0-1.remi.src.rpm Description: A reusable split-off of pecl_http's persistent handle and resource factory API. Fedora Account System Username: remi -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Ga3mj2njcea=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 895592] Review Request: syntaxhighlighter - JavaScript syntax highlighter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895592 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||cicku...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cicku...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- Hmm...No javascript packaging guideline now, only a draft. From fedora-review seems OK, but somethings maybe you should fix: 1) I found that mixture of tab and space in License and Source0 tag. 2) This library has its GitHub page, and the author has tagged the 3.0.83 version. https://github.com/alexgorbatchev/SyntaxHighlighter/tags 3) Is this spec for EL only? I've seen many obsoleted lines and buildroot tag. 4) A little more blanks between sections. Not mandatory. 5) License: MIT or GPLv2. Why not and? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=U1CTau0QtKa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 973904] Review Request: libserf - High-Performance Asynchronous HTTP Client Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973904
--- Comment #12 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
Sorry for this coming late.
It will be great to not put headers directly in /usr/include, but in a sub
directory.
To be in sync with debian packaging, I propose to use serf-1
Notice : this is where pecl_http for example look for them
(which it's stupid, I agree, should use pkg-config output )
Changes:
%configure --includedir=%{_includedir}/%{oname}-1 --with-gssapi=%{_prefix}
%files devel
%{_includedir}/%{oname}-1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=GmFeYh3LFea=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 973904] Review Request: libserf - High-Performance Asynchronous HTTP Client Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973904 --- Comment #13 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Remi Collet from comment #12) Sorry for this coming late. It will be great to not put headers directly in /usr/include, but in a sub directory. Hi, Can you patch the pecl_http to get it worked? It's OK to install libserf into subdir. But I don't know why take this name serf-1? I know this weird name since packaging it..It's a confusion. Why should we name it serf-1, even serf is better than that name... Or maybe I'm wrong. But whatever, should we open a new thread on packaging list? I want to know others' ideas. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=OpPjJGf1fVa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 973904] Review Request: libserf - High-Performance Asynchronous HTTP Client Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973904 --- Comment #14 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #13) (In reply to Remi Collet from comment #12) Sorry for this coming late. It will be great to not put headers directly in /usr/include, but in a sub directory. Hi, Can you patch the pecl_http to get it worked? Yes, of course (for now libserf is not used yet by pecl_http, just in the dev tree) It's OK to install libserf into subdir. But I don't know why take this name serf-1? very probably from library name (libserf-1) pkfconfig file is also serf-1.pc I know this weird name since packaging it..It's a confusion. Why should we name it serf-1, even serf is better than that name... Or maybe I'm wrong. yes, another name could be used. sometime being in sync with other distro, which have this lib for a long time, is a good practice (note, debian have both serf-0 and serf-1) Using a versionned directory allow to have 2 major version installed at the same time (if needed). Look in /usr/include, a lot of already exists. But whatever, should we open a new thread on packaging list? I want to know others' ideas. I you want Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LKyyyaU6n8a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 895592] Review Request: syntaxhighlighter - JavaScript syntax highlighter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895592 --- Comment #2 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1) Hmm...No javascript packaging guideline now, only a draft. From fedora-review seems OK, but somethings maybe you should fix: 1) I found that mixture of tab and space in License and Source0 tag. Agree, will fix it 2) This library has its GitHub page, and the author has tagged the 3.0.83 version. https://github.com/alexgorbatchev/SyntaxHighlighter/tags Yes, but the github only provides the sources and we don't have (yet) needed stuff to run the build (npm, jake, ...) In fact, master use node.js stuff, while old release 3.0.83 use phing. I will look if we can build from source (it seems we need lot of fix because it use a very old version... of course... 2010) But don't know if it worth the work... as will be broken as soon as a new version will be released. Build for JS is mostly: concat + compress (result still readable) 3) Is this spec for EL only? I've seen many obsoleted lines and buildroot tag. This spec target EL-5, so yes buildroot, ... are required. 4) A little more blanks between sections. Not mandatory. 5) License: MIT or GPLv2. Why not and? Because https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Dual_Licensing_Scenarios -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Zp6xgnOLqBa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 895592] Review Request: syntaxhighlighter - JavaScript syntax highlighter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895592 --- Comment #3 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- Build from github sources: https://github.com/remicollet/remirepo/commit/5f76f61988779c3f6a3e0099f8c464a26cddc95a Spec: https://raw.github.com/remicollet/remirepo/5f76f61988779c3f6a3e0099f8c464a26cddc95a/syntaxhighlighter/syntaxhighlighter.spec SRPM: http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/syntaxhighlighter-3.0.83-2.remi.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=j0dPKRpotta=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 929005] Review Request: rubygem-awestruct - A framework for creating static HTML sites
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=929005 Axilleas Pipinellis axill...@archlinux.gr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||axill...@archlinux.gr Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |rubygem-awestruct: a|rubygem-awestruct - A |framework for creating |framework for creating |static HTML sites |static HTML sites -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6OM6eBlCUka=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 895592] Review Request: syntaxhighlighter - JavaScript syntax highlighter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895592 --- Comment #4 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- Fix for EPEL-6 build https://github.com/remicollet/remirepo/commit/e288517d88ccea6525b8c9329133a6e8c8f8b9cd https://github.com/remicollet/remirepo/commit/7fbb189ab904b70a6c5d5a89d2190296b87e32f5 Koji scratch build dist-6E-epel http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5508854 Spec: https://raw.github.com/remicollet/remirepo/7fbb189ab904b70a6c5d5a89d2190296b87e32f5/syntaxhighlighter/syntaxhighlighter.spec Srpm: http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/syntaxhighlighter-3.0.83-2.remi.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hhfhkz4PRVa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 972568] Review Request: uthash - A hash table for C structures
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972568 --- Comment #9 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- NEW Spec URL: http://cicku.me/uthash.spec NEW SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/uthash-1.9.8-3.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=y1rHTMh4dma=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 974834] New: Review Request: libgit2-glib - Git library for GLib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974834 Bug ID: 974834 Summary: Review Request: libgit2-glib - Git library for GLib Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: kalevlem...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/libgit2-glib.spec SRPM URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/libgit2-glib-0.0.2-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: libgit2-glib is a glib wrapper library around the libgit2 git access library. Fedora Account System Username: kalev -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Rg8o2xfNhha=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 974834] Review Request: libgit2-glib - Git library for GLib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974834 Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||867959 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=rFbD7ZCMDra=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959 Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||974834 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=V946EK7XbPa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 921286] Review Request: cmd - wrap bash functions into a command
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921286 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=9UnwATXMQIa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 921286] Review Request: cmd - wrap bash functions into a command
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921286 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- rf-0.4.18-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rf-0.4.18-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=f3bgrf1m6Ta=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957520] Review Request: rf - read feeds from any source
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957520 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- rf-0.4.18-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rf-0.4.18-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=RojunlOBY8a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957520] Review Request: rf - read feeds from any source
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957520 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=x4CZC99oF9a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 961177] Review Request: python-grokmirror - Framework to smartly mirror git repositories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961177
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
Scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5509040
$ rpmlint -i -v *python-grokmirror.src: I: checking
python-grokmirror.src: I: checking-url
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/utils/grokmirror/grokmirror.git (timeout 10
seconds)
python-grokmirror.src: I: checking-url
https://www.kernel.org/pub/software/network/grokmirror/grokmirror-0.3.4.tar.xz
(timeout 10 seconds)
python-grokmirror.noarch: I: checking
python-grokmirror.noarch: I: checking-url
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/utils/grokmirror/grokmirror.git (timeout 10
seconds)
python-grokmirror.spec: I: checking-url
https://www.kernel.org/pub/software/network/grokmirror/grokmirror-0.3.4.tar.xz
(timeout 10 seconds)
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint is clean.
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
GPLv3+
[+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it
is used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream URL can be
specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to
deal with this.
sha256sum *
b25d19c974326ba71816550b1493a6972e39adb879f9d8945928fe0ee4dc9810
grokmirror-0.3.4.tar.xz
b25d19c974326ba71816550b1493a6972e39adb879f9d8945928fe0ee4dc9810
grokmirror-0.3.4.tar.xz.orig
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line.
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for
any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
[.] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific
situations)
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The
definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not
restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity).
[+] MUST: If a package includes something as
[Bug 916433] Review Request: python-tw2-polymaps - Toscawidgets2 wrapper for polymaps - amazing javascript maps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916433 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2013-06-16 06:57:51 --- Comment #11 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com --- Packages are in the stable repos now, so this ticket can be safely closed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=jAvz5JFw4Za=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 916436] Review Request: python-narcissus-app - WSGI components for Narcissus, realtime log visualization
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916436 Bug 916436 depends on bug 916433, which changed state. Bug 916433 Summary: Review Request: python-tw2-polymaps - Toscawidgets2 wrapper for polymaps - amazing javascript maps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916433 What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CVkUpGCu11a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 895592] Review Request: syntaxhighlighter - JavaScript syntax highlighter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895592
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
cp %{SOURCE2} %{SOURCE3} .
should be:
cp -p %{SOURCE2} %{SOURCE3} .
And please preserve the ts when downloading these two licenses.
APPROVED.
Please FIX this problem before importing.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=BwgCb1tYL3a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 895592] Review Request: syntaxhighlighter - JavaScript syntax highlighter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895592 --- Comment #6 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- Plus, no need for %defattr(-,root,root,-), it's only needed RPM 4.4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=U69vJkOUK6a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957520] Review Request: rf - read feeds from any source
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957520 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- rf-0.4.18-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rf-0.4.18-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=m9rLrhb6Fra=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 974834] Review Request: libgit2-glib - Git library for GLib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974834
--- Comment #1 from Ignacio Casal Quinteiro (nacho) i...@gnome.org ---
MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.[1]
[nacho@winterfell Downloads]$ rpmlint libgit2-glib-0.0.2-1.fc20.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
OK
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] .
OK
MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines .
OK.
MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
[3]
OK
MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.[4]
OK, it is included and set on doc
MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5]
OK
MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6]
It is!
MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it is
used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream URL can be
specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to
deal with this.
[nacho@winterfell SPECS]$ sha256sum libgit2-glib-0.0.2.tar.xz
e1e0c6e0cb6897c09e06edc06ee70befca2a3e1b3eb629c449b8ca0f49db75e5
libgit2-glib-0.0.2.tar.xz
[nacho@winterfell SPECS]$ sha256sum ../SOURCES/libgit2-glib-0.0.2.tar.xz
e1e0c6e0cb6897c09e06edc06ee70befca2a3e1b3eb629c449b8ca0f49db75e5
../SOURCES/libgit2-glib-0.0.2.tar.xz
They both match correctly.
MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture. [7]
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5509104
MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8]
It is fine for 64 and 32
MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
It is fine
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9]
Not needed.
MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10]
It does
MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.[11]
It doesn't
MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker. [12]
Not needed
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create
a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create
that directory. [13]
This is not completely correct, we should one of these:
1) have libgit2-glib depend on python3-gobject
2) have libgit2-glib also list /usr/lib64/python3.3/site-packages/gi/ and
/usr/lib64/python3.3/site-packages/gi/overrides/ in its files list
MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific situations)[14]
OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with
executable permissions, for example. [15]
OK
MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16]
OK
MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17]
It does
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition
of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to
size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [18]
OK
MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run
properly if it is not present. [18]
It just uses gtk-doc stuff so this is fine.
MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [19]
Not needed.
MUST: Development files must be in a -devel package. [20]
OK
MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency:
[Bug 957520] Review Request: rf - read feeds from any source
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957520 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- rf-0.4.18-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rf-0.4.18-2.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=s3zMnD2K91a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957520] Review Request: rf - read feeds from any source
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957520 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- rf-0.4.18-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rf-0.4.18-2.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NeVDySsvAaa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 974834] Review Request: libgit2-glib - Git library for GLib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974834 --- Comment #2 from Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com --- MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [13] This is not completely correct, we should one of these: 1) have libgit2-glib depend on python3-gobject 2) have libgit2-glib also list /usr/lib64/python3.3/site-packages/gi/ and /usr/lib64/python3.3/site-packages/gi/overrides/ in its files list Fixed. * Sun Jun 16 2013 Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com - 0.0.2-2 - Review fixes: depend on python3-gobject (#974834) Spec URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/libgit2-glib.spec SRPM URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/libgit2-glib-0.0.2-2.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=C3rNqOl5mja=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 974834] Review Request: libgit2-glib - Git library for GLib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974834 Ignacio Casal Quinteiro (nacho) i...@gnome.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|i...@gnome.org Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Ignacio Casal Quinteiro (nacho) i...@gnome.org --- It looks good to me now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LyNN69QgJJa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 974834] Review Request: libgit2-glib - Git library for GLib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974834 Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com --- Thanks for the review, nacho! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: libgit2-glib Short Description: Git library for GLib Owners: nacho kalev Branches: f19 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6Je2EBBUAJa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 971059] Review Request: nimrod - A statically typed, imperative programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971059 --- Comment #6 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com --- Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5509118 $ rpmlint -i -v * nimrod.i686: I: checking nimrod.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US runtime - run time, run-time, rudiment The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. nimrod.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US realtime - mealtime, real time, real-time The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. nimrod.i686: I: checking-url http://nimrod-code.org (timeout 10 seconds) nimrod.i686: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. nimrod.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/nimrod/nimbase.h A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. nimrod.i686: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/nimrod-0.9.2/contributors.txt The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile's %prep section for example using iconv(1). nimrod.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/lib/nimrod/wrappers/cairo/cairo.nim The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file, possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF. nimrod.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary nimrod Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. nimrod.src: I: checking nimrod.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US runtime - run time, run-time, rudiment The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. nimrod.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US realtime - mealtime, real time, real-time The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. nimrod.src: I: checking-url http://nimrod-code.org (timeout 10 seconds) nimrod.src: I: checking-url http://nimrod-code.org/download/nimrod_0.9.2.zip (timeout 10 seconds) nimrod.x86_64: I: checking nimrod.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US runtime - run time, run-time, rudiment The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. nimrod.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US realtime - mealtime, real time, real-time The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. nimrod.x86_64: I: checking-url http://nimrod-code.org (timeout 10 seconds) nimrod.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. nimrod.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/nimrod-0.9.2/contributors.txt The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile's %prep section for example using iconv(1). nimrod.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/lib64/nimrod/wrappers/cairo/cairo.nim The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file, possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF. nimrod.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/nimrod/nimbase.h A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. nimrod.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary nimrod Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. nimrod-debuginfo.i686: I: checking nimrod-debuginfo.i686: I: checking-url http://nimrod-code.org (timeout 10 seconds) nimrod-debuginfo.i686: E: debuginfo-without-sources This debuginfo package appears to contain debug symbols but no source files. This is often a sign of binaries being unexpectedly stripped too early during the build, or being compiled without compiler debug flags (which again often is a sign of distro's default compiler flags ignored which might have security consequences), or other compiler flags which result in rpmbuild's debuginfo extraction not working as expected. Verify that the binaries are not unexpectedly stripped and that the intended compiler flags are used. nimrod-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking nimrod-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking-url http://nimrod-code.org (timeout 10 seconds) nimrod-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources This debuginfo package appears to contain debug symbols but no source files. This is often a sign of binaries being unexpectedly stripped too early during the build, or being compiled without compiler debug flags (which again often is a sign of distro's default compiler flags ignored which might have security consequences), or other compiler flags which result in rpmbuild's debuginfo extraction not working as expected. Verify that the binaries are not unexpectedly stripped and that the intended compiler flags are used.
[Bug 973780] Review Request: kde-plasma-applicationname - QML plasmoid to display the application title of the focused window
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973780
--- Comment #9 from Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 761828
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=761828action=edit
Source0 with working direct url
Package is fine. No blockers found.
Not a blocker, but Souce0 can be modified to point to an URL, see attached
patch. It's up to you whether using or not. :)
#
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- update-desktop-database is invoked when required
Note: desktop file(s) in kde-plasma-applicationname
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache
--- false positve: whether icons nor mime-info is installed.
- Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install if there is
such a file.
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop
--- false positve: is no application, is KDE-widget
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses
found. Please check the source files for licenses manually.
--- License-Tag is fine.
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
--- license is mentioned in README, should be enough here.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
Note: Package contains tarball without URL, check comments
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[Bug 973780] Review Request: kde-plasma-applicationname - QML plasmoid to display the application title of the focused window
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973780 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=k0s2elmjIVa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 968597] Review Request: nodejs-ejs - Embedded JavaScript templates for Node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968597 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=TicRIqeb09a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 968597] Review Request: nodejs-ejs - Embedded JavaScript templates for Node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968597 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-ejs-0.8.4-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-ejs-0.8.4-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4wsYkXo6uFa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 968597] Review Request: nodejs-ejs - Embedded JavaScript templates for Node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968597 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-ejs-0.8.4-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-ejs-0.8.4-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=u2VToeoVoEa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 968598] Review Request: nodejs-escodegen - ECMAScript code generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968598 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=AqvGqLQEgxa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 968598] Review Request: nodejs-escodegen - ECMAScript code generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968598 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-escodegen-0.0.22-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-escodegen-0.0.22-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XimKW18dWja=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 968598] Review Request: nodejs-escodegen - ECMAScript code generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968598 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-escodegen-0.0.22-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-escodegen-0.0.22-2.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=19aqo8rEx7a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 968598] Review Request: nodejs-escodegen - ECMAScript code generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968598 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-escodegen-0.0.22-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-escodegen-0.0.22-2.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gOukwrlRMKa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 911038] Review Request: nodejs-mimeparse - A Node.js module with basic functions for handling mime-types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911038 Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: nodejs-mimeparse Short Description: A Node.js module with basic functions for handling mime-types Owners: jamielinux patches Branches: f18 f19 el6 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Bbi1RuiqVHa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 911035] Review Request: nodejs-isodate - JavaScript ISO 8601 date/time parser for Node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911035 --- Comment #2 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org --- Spec URL: http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/buddycloud-server/nodejs-isodate.spec SRPM URL: http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/buddycloud-server/SRPMS/nodejs-isodate-0.1.4-2.fc19.src.rpm * Sun Jun 16 2013 Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org - 0.1.4-2 - include test.js -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=P11xGIfHZia=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 911035] Review Request: nodejs-isodate - JavaScript ISO 8601 date/time parser for Node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911035 Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: nodejs-isodate Short Description: JavaScript ISO 8601 date/time parser for Node.js Owners: jamielinux patches Branches: f18 f19 el6 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=TwDMFp9I9Ia=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 911034] Review Request: nodejs-i - Custom inflections for Node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911034 Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: nodejs-i Short Description: Custom inflections for Node.js Owners: jamielinux patches Branches: f18 f19 el6 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ojSiHdsoZda=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 911025] Review Request: nodejs-collections - Data structures with idiomatic JavaScript collection interfaces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911025 --- Comment #3 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org --- Spec URL: http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/buddycloud-server/nodejs-collections.spec SRPM URL: http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/buddycloud-server/SRPMS/nodejs-collections-0.1.20-2.fc19.src.rpm * Sun Jun 16 2013 Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org - 0.1.20-2 - fix URL - include copy of Montage BSD license -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LXGxd4nbqYa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 911029] Review Request: nodejs-dep-graph - Node.js module for simple dependency graph management in JavaScript
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911029 --- Comment #3 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org --- Spec URL: http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/buddycloud-server/nodejs-dep-graph.spec SRPM URL: http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/buddycloud-server/SRPMS/nodejs-dep-graph-1.1.0-2.fc19.src.rpm * Sun Jun 16 2013 Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org - 1.1.0-2 - unconditionalize 'cake build' - improve Summary -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Y0lj1tCTFUa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 911025] Review Request: nodejs-collections - Data structures with idiomatic JavaScript collection interfaces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911025 T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com --- This package is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=sIg8f5grrxa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 911029] Review Request: nodejs-dep-graph - Node.js module for simple dependency graph management in JavaScript
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911029 T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com --- Still builds in mock fine with `cake build` enabled, so APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=V2JUuYdb3Ma=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 961177] Review Request: python-grokmirror - Framework to smartly mirror git repositories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961177 Konstantin Ryabitsev mri...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|i...@fedoraproject.org | Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Konstantin Ryabitsev mri...@gmail.com --- Thanks, Mario! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-grokmirror Short Description: Framework to smartly mirror git repositories Owners: icon Branches: f18 f19 el6 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=EeagALN9o7a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 895592] Review Request: syntaxhighlighter - JavaScript syntax highlighter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895592 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- Thanks for the review. I will clean the EL-5 stuff after import (EL-5 is no more a target as phing is missing) New Package SCM Request === Package Name: syntaxhighlighter Short Description: JavaScript syntax highlighter Owners: remi Branches: f18 f19 el6 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=neEzi0cSvma=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 974852] New: Review Request: fish - A Friendly Interactive SHell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974852 Bug ID: 974852 Summary: Review Request: fish - A Friendly Interactive SHell Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: laurence.mcglas...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://github.com/lrm29/fish-rpm/blob/master/fish.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/lrm29/fish-rpm/blob/master/fish-2.0.0-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: fish is a shell geared towards interactive use. Its features are focused on user friendliness and discoverability. The language syntax is simple but incompatible with other shell languages. Fedora Account System Username: lrm29 Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5509440 This is my first package, and I am seeking a sponsor. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=IWOcA4BOxTa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 911029] Review Request: nodejs-dep-graph - Node.js module for simple dependency graph management in JavaScript
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911029 Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: nodejs-dep-graph Short Description: Simple dependency graph management in JavaScript Owners: jamielinux patches Branches: f18 f19 el6 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=isUz5CAwPra=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 974852] Review Request: fish - A Friendly Interactive SHell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974852 laurence.mcglas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=SXfsVJEStva=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 911025] Review Request: nodejs-collections - Data structures with idiomatic JavaScript collection interfaces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911025 --- Comment #5 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: nodejs-collections Short Description: Data structures with idiomatic JavaScript collection interfaces Owners: jamielinux patches Branches: f18 f19 el6 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5FXKNArgrWa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 911025] Review Request: nodejs-collections - Data structures with idiomatic JavaScript collection interfaces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911025 Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5bA7xkdCfHa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 973904] Review Request: libserf - High-Performance Asynchronous HTTP Client Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973904 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- libserf-1.2.1-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libserf-1.2.1-3.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=BOn27cc3Ria=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 973904] Review Request: libserf - High-Performance Asynchronous HTTP Client Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973904 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- libserf-1.2.1-3.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libserf-1.2.1-3.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=QfLA9bQZH6a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 973780] Review Request: kde-plasma-applicationname - QML plasmoid to display the application title of the focused window
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973780 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com --- Many thanks for your review! I'll have a look at your patch before importing it to the Git repo. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: kde-plasma-applicationname Short Description: QML plasmoid to display the application title of the focused window Owners: mariobl Branches: f18 f19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NcsQ41JcP1a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 852254] Review Request: python-clouddns - Python interface to Rackspace Cloud DNS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852254 --- Comment #4 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com --- The URL link is not available (HTTP 404). The new location is https://github.com/rackerlabs/python-clouddns. Moreover, python-devel is deprecated, use python2-devel instead: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#BuildRequires -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=oPVLDSapfYa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 972719] Review Request: nicstat - prints out network statistics for all network interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972719 Tomasz Torcz zdzi...@irc.pl changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #760712|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #11 from Tomasz Torcz zdzi...@irc.pl --- Created attachment 761881 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=761881action=edit changes in nicstat.spec Spec: http://ttorcz.fedorapeople.org/nicstat.spec SRPM: http://ttorcz.fedorapeople.org/nicstat-1.92-5.fc18.src.rpm Thank you, Douglas. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8k6AAjZlRia=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 911186] Review Request: mocha - A simple, flexible, fun test framework for Node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911186 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||mocha-1.10.0-1.el6 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- mocha-1.10.0-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ox8dagP63Oa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 910150] Review Request: nodejs-express - Sinatra inspired web development framework for Node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910150 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||nodejs-express-3.2.5-1.el6 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-express-3.2.5-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LX9BRdhmLYa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 967187] Review Request: wemux - A tool help improve multi-user terminal multiplexing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967187 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|wemux-2.2.0-1.fc19 |wemux-2.2.0-1.el6 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- wemux-2.2.0-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gv6166C0KPa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 950296] Review Request: reposurgeon - A tool for doing surgical operations on repositories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=950296 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|reposurgeon-2.39-2.fc19 |reposurgeon-2.39-2.el6 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- reposurgeon-2.39-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=oGXdqk4vOXa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 958344] Review Request: python-extras - Useful extra bits for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958344 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-extras-0.0.3-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=VZUk0i3iTJa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 910142] Review Request: nodejs-send - Better streaming static file server with Range and conditional-GET support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910142 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||nodejs-send-0.1.0-3.el6 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-send-0.1.0-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=d3R8opgr30a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 968859] Review Request: nodejs-through - Simplified stream construction for Node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968859 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|nodejs-through-2.3.4-1.fc18 |nodejs-through-2.3.4-1.el6 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-through-2.3.4-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=sK32EhnDlla=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 910148] Review Request: nodejs-connect - High performance middleware framework for Node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910148 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||nodejs-connect-2.7.10-1.el6 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-connect-2.7.10-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vZ3cdMYBnUa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 883413] Review Request: java-dirq - Directory based queue
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883413 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- java-dirq-1.3-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ql8kZMyJAda=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 910119] Review Request: nodejs-commander - Node.js command-line interfaces made easy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910119 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||nodejs-commander-1.1.1-1.el ||6 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-commander-1.1.1-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=kvUki9ZA4Pa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 911258] Review Request: expresso - A lightweight, fast, test-driven development (TDD) framework for Node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911258 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||expresso-0.9.2-3.el6 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- expresso-0.9.2-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LQWjNzpcIqa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 910145] Review Request: nodejs-ltx - A Node.js module for parsing, modifying and building XML
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910145 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||nodejs-ltx-0.2.3-1.el6 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-ltx-0.2.3-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=IifDkHhKW6a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 968606] Review Request: nodejs-paperboy - A node.js module for delivering static files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968606 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|nodejs-paperboy-0.0.5-1.fc1 |nodejs-paperboy-0.0.5-1.el6 |8 | --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-paperboy-0.0.5-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4BIPtD3a8Ma=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962820] Review Request: pngquant - PNG quantization tool for reducing image file size
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962820 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|pngquant-1.8.3-6.fc19 |pngquant-1.8.3-6.el5 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- pngquant-1.8.3-6.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=veKyaqC52xa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962820] Review Request: pngquant - PNG quantization tool for reducing image file size
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962820 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|pngquant-1.8.3-6.el5|pngquant-1.8.3-6.el6 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- pngquant-1.8.3-6.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=i18zVpwvZSa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 883413] Review Request: java-dirq - Directory based queue
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883413 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- java-dirq-1.3-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=h2VyNQhbK5a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 911183] Review Request: nodejs-jade - Jade template engine for Node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911183 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||nodejs-jade-0.28.2-1.el6 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-jade-0.28.2-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gsiHzWxfsda=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 968855] Review Request: nodejs-defined - Return the first argument that is '!== undefined'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968855 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|nodejs-defined-0.0.0-1.fc18 |nodejs-defined-0.0.0-1.el6 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-defined-0.0.0-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=STDfpZIG4va=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 968598] Review Request: nodejs-escodegen - ECMAScript code generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968598 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-escodegen-0.0.22-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NzuRa6W93pa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 968856] Review Request: nodejs-jsonify - JSON without touching any globals
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968856 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|nodejs-jsonify-0.0.0-1.fc18 |nodejs-jsonify-0.0.0-1.el6 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-jsonify-0.0.0-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6AsIwBuVnva=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 785462] Review Request: sinfo - Show an overview of the available computers an their current load
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785462 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- sinfo-0.0.47-3.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=iJG5sQV7RYa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957520] Review Request: rf - read feeds from any source
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957520 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- rf-0.4.18-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=aHeACJ8DsFa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 968597] Review Request: nodejs-ejs - Embedded JavaScript templates for Node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968597 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-ejs-0.8.4-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=w6ptOt4PKpa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 956134] Review Request: mnmlicons-fonts - Perkins Less Web Framework webfonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956134 --- Comment #7 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com --- Hm... I'm still quite new to fonts, and things are not really clear to me. That said, the mnmlicons font is just a set of icons and not a traditional character font (and it's definitely not a Serif character font). All this means, still as I understand it, that the only meaningful usecase is when the app requests the mnmlicons font. It can't substitute for anything else, and can't be substituted. That's why I left the fontconfig file empty, right or wrong. I should have mentioned that this is packaged as a dependency of bug 957339, a web application which bundles this font upstream. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ACaFYE32l8a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 974348] Review Request: python-itsdangerous - Python library for passing trusted data to untrusted environments
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974348 --- Comment #3 from Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com --- Thanks Ricky. Updated: http://fedorapeople.org/~dcallagh/python-itsdangerous/python-itsdangerous.spec http://fedorapeople.org/~dcallagh/python-itsdangerous/python-itsdangerous-0.21-2.fc18.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ERNZr1D4zFa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 814088] Review Request: fungal - a POJO kernel environment used by Ironjacamar standalone
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=814088 --- Comment #8 from Lin Gao l...@redhat.com --- The developer will include a license file in next release, but I need to wait for that. so I will re-submit this package till next release of fungal. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=drEigLepQKa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
