[Bug 995974] Review Request: libbson - BSON library for C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rc040...@freenet.de --- Comment #4 from Ralf Corsepius --- (In reply to Joshua Small from comment #3) > -Werror is usually there for a reason - I'd be concerned about simply > disabling it in order to get a package built. -Werror raises warnings to errors - Even neglible ones. That said, using -Werror has its justifications during development, but is very tedious in production release SW. It's even more tedious when taking longer time frames into account, because the set of warnings GCC warns about changes over time and because other factors (e.g. CFLAGS, other packages, etc.) influence the warnings. In other words, IMO, using -Werror in production SW is naive and non-helpful. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=66FYcgqh3Z&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 822329] Review Request: libzen - Shared library for libmediainfo and medianfo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822329 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FhCaF9F7xV&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 822329] Review Request: libzen - Shared library for libmediainfo and medianfo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822329 --- Comment #53 from Fedora Update System --- libzen-0.4.29-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libzen-0.4.29-2.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=x0oARL237c&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 822329] Review Request: libzen - Shared library for libmediainfo and medianfo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822329 --- Comment #54 from Fedora Update System --- libzen-0.4.29-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libzen-0.4.29-2.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=9D9mO10m4Y&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995995] New: Review Request: lunar-date - Chinese lunar date library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995995 Bug ID: 995995 Summary: Review Request: lunar-date - Chinese lunar date library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: crtm...@gmx.us QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://people.midymidy.com/~ekd123/RPM/lunar-date.spec SRPM URL: http://people.midymidy.com/~ekd123/RPM/lunar-date-2.4.0-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: A feature-complete GLib-based library for Chinese lunar date conversion. Fedora Account System Username: unixekd123 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0eJWL2aDw1&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 822329] Review Request: libzen - Shared library for libmediainfo and medianfo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822329 --- Comment #55 from Fedora Update System --- libzen-0.4.29-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libzen-0.4.29-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=GiurwbNdZp&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995995] Review Request: lunar-date - Chinese lunar date library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995995 Mike Manilone changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=eLLpnKuyxW&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 972431] Review Request: airtsp - C++ Simulated Airline Travel Solution Provider Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972431 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rc040...@freenet.de --- Comment #8 from Ralf Corsepius --- MUSTFIX: * /usr/bin/airtsp-config is not multilib-capable -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pr3Vjt33NM&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 991400] Review Request: myrulib - E-Book Library Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991400 --- Comment #5 from Vasiliy Glazov --- Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/RussianFedora/myrulib/master/myrulib.spec SRPM URL: http://koji.russianfedora.ru/koji/getfile?taskID=83453&name=myrulib-0.29.14-4.fc20.R.src.rpm All bundled libraries removed. .desktop file validated. Suffix .R present only in my srpm file. If you rebuild it .R will be removed automattically. Since I remove bundled libraries this files not compiled ant it's licenses not used. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2L2UFjq4rD&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995974] Review Request: libbson - BSON library for C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974 --- Comment #5 from Mike Manilone --- This happens in static assertions, so after compiling this library, these assertions are useless. We can safely disable -Werror. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=h2i3U5HnvI&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995864] Review Request: liblinear - Library for Large Linear Classification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995864 --- Comment #2 from Björn Esser --- (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1) > %doc COPYRIGHT appeared twice. > > I think just put it in main pkg is ok. Why? Can you share your thoughs in a bit more elaborated sentence, please? I think having COPYRIGHT in base and doc-pkg is a must to meet the guidelines from [1]. The doc-subpkg has, apart from the others, no deps on any pkg. Documentation should not require some binary-pkg, because most people want to read docs BEFORE installing the binary. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Subpackage_Licensing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=3bMKUXqG7F&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995974] Review Request: libbson - BSON library for C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974 --- Comment #6 from Mike Manilone --- OK... I've found out the reason. A patch has been sent to the upstream. The following src.rpm also includes it. Spec URL: http://people.midymidy.com/~ekd123/RPM/libbson.spec SRPM URL: http://people.midymidy.com/~ekd123/RPM/libbson-0.1.10-2.fc19.src.rpm Patch: http://people.midymidy.com/~ekd123/RPM/libbson.noerror.patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qrOfg6odhN&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 868266] Review Request: python-pyglet - A cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868266 --- Comment #40 from Petr Viktorin --- Sorry for the late response, I was on vacation last week. Looks like I didn't test enough on f18. The fix should be easy (use python-imaging instead of Pillow on f18) but testing it will take longer. I'll open a new bug if you don't beat me to it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2DU8uxn0tT&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995995] Review Request: lunar-date - Chinese lunar date library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995995 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cicku...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Christopher Meng --- 1.This is not the latest version. 2. Have you tested its usability? This package has been packaged by myself for a long time, but because its upstream is dead, I'm not sure if it's useful. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=yW0fPgm3KG&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 991339] Review Request: rubygem-sdoc - RDoc generator to build searchable HTML documentation for Ruby code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991339
--- Comment #4 from Miroslav Suchý ---
I would prefer rather if you would include those .asciidoc files.
That would mean that you have to:
BuildRequires: asciidoc
BuildRequires: libxslt
#if you plan to build for el5
%if 0%{?rhel} && 0%{?rhel} < 6
BuildRequires: docbook-style-xsl
%endif
%build
a2x -d manpage -f manpage FOO.1.asciidoc
Additionally %files section should be:
%doc %{_mandir}/man1/sdoc-merge.1*
%doc %{_mandir}/man1/sdoc.1*
as the extension can be changed in future to something else (e.g .xz)
warning: bogus date in %changelog: Wed Aug 06 2013 Josef Stribny
- 0.3.20-2
Aug 06 was not Wednesday.
rubygem-sdoc.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/gems/gems/sdoc-0.3.20/lib/rdoc/generator/template/rails/resources/js/highlight.pack.js
rubygem-sdoc.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/gems/gems/sdoc-0.3.20/lib/rdoc/generator/template/rails/resources/panel/index.html
rubygem-sdoc.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/gems/gems/sdoc-0.3.20/lib/rdoc/generator/template/sdoc/resources/js/main.js
rubygem-sdoc.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/gems/gems/sdoc-0.3.20/lib/rdoc/generator/template/rails/_context.rhtml
rubygem-sdoc.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/gems/gems/sdoc-0.3.20/lib/rdoc/generator/template/rails/resources/js/jquery-effect.js
rubygem-sdoc.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/gems/gems/sdoc-0.3.20/lib/rdoc/generator/template/sdoc/resources/css/reset.css
rubygem-sdoc.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/gems/gems/sdoc-0.3.20/lib/rdoc/generator/template/sdoc/resources/js/jquery-1.3.2.min.js
rubygem-sdoc.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/gems/gems/sdoc-0.3.20/lib/rdoc/generator/template/rails/resources/css/main.css
rubygem-sdoc.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/gems/gems/sdoc-0.3.20/lib/rdoc/generator/template/sdoc/index.rhtml
rubygem-sdoc.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/gems/gems/sdoc-0.3.20/lib/rdoc/generator/template/sdoc/resources/panel/index.html
rubygem-sdoc.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/gems/gems/sdoc-0.3.20/lib/rdoc/generator/template/rails/file.rhtml
rubygem-sdoc.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/gems/gems/sdoc-0.3.20/lib/rdoc/generator/template/rails/resources/js/searchdoc.js
rubygem-sdoc.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/gems/gems/sdoc-0.3.20/lib/rdoc/generator/template/rails/class.rhtml
rubygem-sdoc.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/gems/gems/sdoc-0.3.20/lib/rdoc/generator/template/sdoc/resources/css/panel.css
rubygem-sdoc.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/gems/gems/sdoc-0.3.20/lib/rdoc/generator/template/sdoc/resources/js/highlight.pack.js
rubygem-sdoc.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/gems/gems/sdoc-0.3.20/lib/rdoc/generator/template/rails/resources/js/main.js
rubygem-sdoc.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/gems/gems/sdoc-0.3.20/lib/rdoc/generator/template/sdoc/_context.rhtml
rubygem-sdoc.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/gems/gems/sdoc-0.3.20/lib/rdoc/generator/template/sdoc/resources/css/main.css
rubygem-sdoc.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/gems/gems/sdoc-0.3.20/lib/rdoc/generator/template/rails/resources/js/jquery-1.3.2.min.js
rubygem-sdoc.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/gems/gems/sdoc-0.3.20/lib/rdoc/generator/template/rails/index.rhtml
rubygem-sdoc.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/gems/gems/sdoc-0.3.20/lib/rdoc/generator/template/sdoc/resources/js/jquery-effect.js
rubygem-sdoc.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/gems/gems/sdoc-0.3.20/lib/rdoc/generator/template/sdoc/file.rhtml
rubygem-sdoc.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/gems/gems/sdoc-0.3.20/lib/rdoc/generator/template/sdoc/class.rhtml
rubygem-sdoc.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/gems/gems/sdoc-0.3.20/lib/rdoc/generator/template/sdoc/resources/js/searchdoc.js
rubygem-sdoc.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/gems/gems/sdoc-0.3.20/lib/rdoc/generator/template/rails/resources/css/reset.css
rubygem-sdoc.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/gems/gems/sdoc-0.3.20/lib/rdoc/generator/template/rails/resources/css/panel.css
You should probably
chmod a-x
on these files.
Requires: rubygem(rdoc) => 3.10
Requires: rubygem(rdoc) < 4
This deps could not be met on current Fedora as in Fedora is:
rubygem-rdoc-4.0.1-2.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2vcpON8UHy&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995995] Review Request: lunar-date - Chinese lunar date library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995995 --- Comment #2 from Mike Manilone --- (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1) > 1.This is not the latest version. http://code.google.com/p/liblunar/ shows that this is the latest one. > > 2. Have you tested its usability? This package has been packaged by myself > for a long time, but because its upstream is dead, I'm not sure if it's > useful. https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/675/lunar-calendar/ depends on it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=h7gAkYByAa&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996042] New: Review Request: tinyxml2 - Simple, small and efficient C++ XML parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996042 Bug ID: 996042 Summary: Review Request: tinyxml2 - Simple, small and efficient C++ XML parser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: f...@fcami.net QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://fcami.fedorapeople.org/srpms/tinyxml2.spec SRPM URL: http://fcami.fedorapeople.org/srpms/tinyxml2-1.0.11-2.20130805git0323851.fc18.src.rpm Description: TinyXML-2 is a simple, small, efficient, C++ XML parser that can be easily integrated into other programs. It uses a Document Object Model (DOM), meaning the XML data is parsed into a C++ objects that can be browsed and manipulated, and then written to disk or another output stream. TinyXML-2 doesn't parse or use DTDs (Document Type Definitions) nor XSLs (eXtensible Stylesheet Language). TinyXML-2 uses a similar API to TinyXML-1, But the implementation of the parser was completely re-written to make it more appropriate for use in a game. It uses less memory, is faster, and uses far fewer memory allocations. Fedora Account System Username: fcami -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6CaKlL23zk&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996042] Review Request: tinyxml2 - Simple, small and efficient C++ XML parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996042 Susi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||991744 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=08zi1Jo60q&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996042] Review Request: tinyxml2 - Simple, small and efficient C++ XML parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996042 Susi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||susi.leht...@iki.fi Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|susi.leht...@iki.fi Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=c5BhElIQCF&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996042] Review Request: tinyxml2 - Simple, small and efficient C++ XML parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996042 Mario Ceresa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrcer...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Mario Ceresa --- Hello François, Susi, I'm also interested in having tinyxml2 packaged: just tell me how I can be of help. Best, Mario -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=RxpKYgKTNX&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 991339] Review Request: rubygem-sdoc - RDoc generator to build searchable HTML documentation for Ruby code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991339 --- Comment #5 from Josef Stribny --- Good catch, there is an upstream issue[1] and pull request to handle this, but I can't say it's everything to be done. Let's see if it's merged in upstream, then it can be added as a patch. [1] https://github.com/voloko/sdoc/pull/48 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6Dkez8dXdu&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 835089] Review Request: Script-Tools - A script framework based on bash
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835089 --- Comment #18 from Simon A. Erat --- Created attachment 785633 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=785633&action=edit Tarball containing everything, not 'in' but with subdirs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=EiahFZxEyu&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 835089] Review Request: Script-Tools - A script framework based on bash
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835089 --- Comment #19 from Simon A. Erat --- Created attachment 785634 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=785634&action=edit Specfile -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8zGphvPneU&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 835089] Review Request: Script-Tools - A script framework based on bash
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835089 --- Comment #20 from Simon A. Erat --- Created attachment 785636 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=785636&action=edit Package 'source' from my build-host -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gcLTNsQoFl&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 835089] Review Request: Script-Tools - A script framework based on bash
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835089 --- Comment #21 from Simon A. Erat --- Spec: http://sourceforge.net/projects/script-tools/files/script-tools.spec/download Source: http://sourceforge.net/projects/script-tools/files/script-tools-0.8.2-beta.fc19.src.rpm/download Repo: http://sourceforge.net/projects/script-tools/files/script-tools.repo/download Tarball: http://sourceforge.net/projects/script-tools/files/script-tools-0.8.2.tar.gz/download Koji 1:http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5796920 Koji 2:http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5796912 -- For either explaining, shocking or amusement purposes a video, done early morning after working the night through, to present how one may 'release' package using script-tools (st dev release LABEL) or how i have configured it once, to keep everything working for me with just 1 line in shell. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIeDLZgHpBM -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=tHSyetwUAp&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 839056] Review Request: python-flake8 - code checking using pep8 and pyflakes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839056 --- Comment #14 from Matthias Runge --- any news here? Is there something I can do to help here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=v9PB5uLhFj&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 866265] Review Request: opentrep - C++ API for parsing travel-focused requests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866265 Michael Schwendt changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(bugs.michael@gmx. | |net)| --- Comment #9 from Michael Schwendt --- Amazing. It's really assigned to me already, but doesn't show up anywhere in my reviews folder. [...] In the build.log: > sh: epstopdf: command not found Many times. Adding that tool as BR doesn't seem to change anything. $ repoquery --whatprovides /usr/bin/epstopdf texlive-epstopdf-bin-3:svn18336.0-0.1.20130608_r30832.fc19.noarch texlive-epstopdf-bin-2:svn18336.0-22.20130427_r30134.fc19.noarch There's a PDF in the -doc package, which contains: $ cat refman.pdf Warning:\ the\ PDF\ reference\ manual\ (/builddir/build/BUILD/opentrep-0.5.3/doc/latex/refman.pdf)\ has\ failed\ to\ build.\ You\ can\ perform\ a\ simple\ re-build\ (make\ in\ the\ doc/latex\ sub-directory). [...] > opentrep-devel-0.5.3-2.fc19.x86_64.rpm > /bin/sh > pkgconfig The /bin/sh is for a shell-script: -rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/opentrep-config It contains a hardcoded libdir path and therefore is not multilib-installable. One common way to fix it is to make the script retrieve variables from the pkgconfig file: $ pkg-config --variable=libdir opentrep /usr/lib64 [...] > opentrep-0.5.3-2.fc19.x86_64.rpm > > -rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/pyopentrep Same here (not multilib-installable) and more. It appends /usr/lib64 to sys.path in an attempt at finding libpyopentrep, but that won't work as expected. The needed *.so lib is stored in the optional -devel package: $ pyopentrep Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/pyopentrep", line 286, in import libpyopentrep ImportError: No module named libpyopentrep With this run-time requirement, it would be plausible to move libpyopentrep.so into the base package, too. Even cleaner would be to store it in Python's search path for modules, so appending to sys.path would not be needed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6Nel6JdHEi&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996059] New: Review Request: python-oslo-messaging - OpenStack common messaging library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996059 Bug ID: 996059 Summary: Review Request: python-oslo-messaging - OpenStack common messaging library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mar...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://markmc.fedorapeople.org/python-oslo-messaging.spec SRPM URL: http://markmc.fedorapeople.org/python-oslo-messaging-1.2.0-0.1.a1.fc20.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: markmc Description: The Oslo project intends to produce a python library containing infrastructure code shared by OpenStack projects. The APIs provided by the project should be high quality, stable, consistent and generally useful. The Oslo messaging API supports RPC and notifications over a number of different messaging transports. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5eb4BnRlPK&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996061] New: Review Request: python-sphinx-theme-flask - Sphinx Themes for Flask related projects and Flask itself
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996061 Bug ID: 996061 Summary: Review Request: python-sphinx-theme-flask - Sphinx Themes for Flask related projects and Flask itself Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: bjoern.es...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Description: python-sphinx-theme-flask contains Sphinx Themes for Flask related projects and Flask itself. The following themes exist: * flask - the standard flask documentation theme for large projects * flask_small - small one-page theme. Intended to be used by very small addon libraries for flask. Koji Builds: el5: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5807573 el6: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5807575 F18: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5807577 F19: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5807579 Frh: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5807581 rpmlint (installed pkgs, rawhide): python-sphinx-theme-flask.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US addon -> ad don, ad-don, add on 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. fedora-review: no issues found by automatic tests Fedora Account System Username: besser82 Urls: Spec URL: http://besser82.fedorapeople.org/review/python-sphinx-theme-flask.spec SRPM URL: http://besser82.fedorapeople.org/review/python-sphinx-theme-flask-git20130715.1cc4468-1.fc19.src.rpm # Thanks for review in advance! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=EwW1yjIlTO&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995995] Review Request: lunar-date - Chinese lunar date library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995995 --- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng --- I can find 3.0 version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=TS1g0qYa9w&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996061] Review Request: python-sphinx-theme-flask - Sphinx Themes for Flask related projects and Flask itself
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996061 Björn Esser changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||python-sphinx-theme-flask -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=rsqJUuzMIO&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995974] Review Request: libbson - BSON library for C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
--- Comment #7 from Joshua Small ---
To clarify my point..
The upstream has created a product which, by default, ships with -Werror.
Whether this is unhelpful is an issue for upstream.
If the product fails to even compile in a basic environment, this is an issue
far better addressed upstream (and one I'd imagine they'd be keen to see fixed)
than patched out at packaging time by disabling the error.
As far as review goes:
Obviously, the blocker here is waiting until it's stable.
I'm assuming that once a "stable" version is declared, you'll match the version
number and source0 accordingly.
The patch0 address in the .spec file just 404's on me - although I'm expecting
this to be redundant once this patch is incorporated.
This line:
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
Is obsolete and should no longer be used. See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
rpmlint hits up a few errors worth reviewing:
./libbson.spec:65: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package devel %{_libdir}/*.so
Several of the above errors. They make sense - if a file is noarch, would it
really belong in /usr/lib64, as per /usr/lib64/libbson-1.0.so?
libbson.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libbson-0.1.10/NEWS
Get rid of this file if it doesn't ever have "news".
libbson-python.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cbson.so.0.0.0 cbson.so.0()(64bit)
There's some documentation on this error here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#private-shared-object-provides
However, I'm unsure if your intention should involve filtering the library out,
or deliberately providing it.
I've run a koji build so others can review your build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5807541
You can review there full output for this error:
FAILED: BuildError: mismatch when analyzing
libbson-devel-0.1.10-2.fc19.noarch.rpm
The errors shown may be related to the no arch issue above.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bVCG7by0eA&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996066] New: Review Request: kcron - System Log Viewer for KDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996066 Bug ID: 996066 Summary: Review Request: kcron - System Log Viewer for KDE Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mbr...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://mbriza.fedorapeople.org/kdeadmin/kcron.spec SRPM URL: http://mbriza.fedorapeople.org/kdeadmin/kcron-4.10.97-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: This program is developed for beginner users, who don't know how to find information about their Linux system, and don't know where log files are. It is also of course designed for advanced users, who quickly want to understand problems of their machine with a more powerful and graphical tool than tail -f and less commands. Fedora Account System Username: mbriza -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ahOjsfBEwk&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996066] Review Request: kcron - System Log Viewer for KDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996066 Martin Bříza changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2013-08-12 06:56:34 --- Comment #1 from Martin Bříza --- Man, mixed two packages, let's try it again -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Oi6S5H1c8R&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996067] New: Review Request: kcron - Cron KDE configuration module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996067 Bug ID: 996067 Summary: Review Request: kcron - Cron KDE configuration module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mbr...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://mbriza.fedorapeople.org/kdeadmin/kcron.spec SRPM URL: http://mbriza.fedorapeople.org/kdeadmin/kcron-4.10.97-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: Systemsettings module for the cron task scheduler. Fedora Account System Username: mbriza -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=q3XUGnSoqN&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996068] New: Review Request: ksystemlog - System Log Viewer for KDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996068 Bug ID: 996068 Summary: Review Request: ksystemlog - System Log Viewer for KDE Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mbr...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://mbriza.fedorapeople.org/kdeadmin/ksystemlog.spec SRPM URL: http://mbriza.fedorapeople.org/kdeadmin/ksystemlog-4.10.97-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: This program is developed for beginner users, who don't know how to find information about their Linux system, and don't know where log files are. It is also of course designed for advanced users, who quickly want to understand problems of their machine with a more powerful and graphical tool than tail -f and less commands. Fedora Account System Username: mbriza -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MLWHvM8qMv&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996069] New: Review Request: kuser - User Manager for KDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996069 Bug ID: 996069 Summary: Review Request: kuser - User Manager for KDE Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mbr...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://mbriza.fedorapeople.org/kdeadmin/kuser.spec SRPM URL: http://mbriza.fedorapeople.org/kdeadmin/kuser-4.10.97-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: KUser is a tool for managing users and groups on your system. Fedora Account System Username: mbriza -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=P9TGXopP9Q&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995974] Review Request: libbson - BSON library for C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974 --- Comment #8 from Joshua Small --- Additional: Your script runs autogen.sh, followed by ./configure. The second line of autogen.sh is "./configure", so something is redundant here. Reading the documentation, once a tarball (stable) is developed, autogen.sh won't be required anyway. The application has a "make test" that should probably be used in a %check process. The README states: In your source code: #include However, every header file seems to suggest you should instead #include . Your current -devel package places these files in On a note unrelated to packaging, new applications should not be using MD5. Wikipedia states: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MD5 "should be considered cryptographically broken and unsuitable for further use" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=eYx69CDSCg&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996042] Review Request: tinyxml2 - Simple, small and efficient C++ XML parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996042 --- Comment #2 from François Cami --- Builds in mock/rawhide/x86_64: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5807662 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=yxT9fwz7Pv&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996067] Review Request: kcron - Cron KDE configuration module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996067 Martin Bříza changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews) Alias||kcron -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CcBjq6dosX&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996068] Review Request: ksystemlog - System Log Viewer for KDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996068 Martin Bříza changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews) Alias||ksystemlog -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1nIHgXXN1o&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996069] Review Request: kuser - User Manager for KDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996069 Martin Bříza changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews) Alias||kuser -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=wrBAMb0qvR&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995995] Review Request: lunar-date - Chinese lunar date library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995995 --- Comment #4 from Mike Manilone --- Nope, that's lunar-calendar, a graphical library targetting Gtk+3, while lunar-date is a low-level library for date conversion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hItBV4FQax&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995974] Review Request: libbson - BSON library for C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974 --- Comment #9 from Ralf Corsepius --- (In reply to Joshua Small from comment #7) > To clarify my point.. > > The upstream has created a product which, by default, ships with -Werror. > Whether this is unhelpful is an issue for upstream. You're in error: Being a fedora packager, this will be your issue. What will happen is: With many changes in Fedora (e.g GCC, new targets, new libs) your package will break building for cosmetical, negibile and stylish issues - It will be you to handle these issues. That said, in many cases it's not much of a problem to provoke arbitrary numbers of such issues ... e.g. by adding further cflags - That said, I can only repeat what I said in different wording: It's evidence of lack upstream developent experience to ship production SW with -Werror. Packaging history is full of packages having gone this road. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ULldgS4RnX&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995864] Review Request: liblinear - Library for Large Linear Classification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995864 --- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt --- What I don't understand is why the Python subpackages don't use %?_isa? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package $ rpm -qR python-liblinear|grep -v ^rpm liblinear = 1.93-1.fc19 python(abi) = 2.7 The Python module strictly needs the arch-specific lib using a specific SONAME. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YxaTlPgieu&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996088] New: Review Request: python-pathtools - Pattern matching and various utilities for file systems paths
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996088 Bug ID: 996088 Summary: Review Request: python-pathtools - Pattern matching and various utilities for file systems paths Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: bjoern.es...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Description: python-pathtools is a Python API library for common path and pattern functionality. Koji Builds: not avail, because missing deps from rhbz# 996061 rpmlint (installed pkgs, rawhide): 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. fedora-review: no issues found by automatic tests Fedora Account System Username: besser82 Urls: Spec URL: http://besser82.fedorapeople.org/review/python-pathtools.spec SRPM URL: http://besser82.fedorapeople.org/review/python-pathtools-0.1.2-1.fc19.src.rpm # Thanks for review in advance! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=K5N8LTqppd&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996088] Review Request: python-pathtools - Pattern matching and various utilities for file systems paths
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996088 Björn Esser changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||996061 ||(python-sphinx-theme-flask) Alias||python-pathtools -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ksMmDJFJyv&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996061] Review Request: python-sphinx-theme-flask - Sphinx Themes for Flask related projects and Flask itself
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996061 Björn Esser changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||996088 (python-pathtools) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=w8RNsSDSEk&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996059] Review Request: python-oslo-messaging - OpenStack common messaging library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996059
Alan Pevec changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ape...@redhat.com,
||mar...@redhat.com
Flags||needinfo?(mar...@redhat.com
||)
--- Comment #1 from Alan Pevec ---
Summary:
* License file is not included in the main package %doc
* usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/oslo/__init__.py was included in
python-oslo-messaging RPM
which should be a namespace package (bad d2to1 in Rawhide?)
*%check is nice to have, are any test-deps missing in Fedora?
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: there rm -rf %{buildroot}%{python_sitelib}/tests to avoid packaging
of unittests
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
Note: python-oslo-messaging-doc is usable stand-alone, so no versioned
dependecy is required.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: doc/source/conf.py is w/o explict license, but it's a trivial config
file, top-level ASL2.0 is assumed.
[!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
Not included in the main package %doc
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[!]: Package does not generate any conflict.
usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/oslo/__init__.py was included in
python-oslo-messaging RPM
which should be a namespace package (bad d2to1 in Rawhide?)
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
See above about oslo namespace conflict.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, th
[Bug 835089] Review Request: Script-Tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835089 Simon A. Erat changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |Script-Tools - A script |Script-Tools |framework based on bash | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=a9dZDA0lXX&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 835089] Review Request: Script-Tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835089 Simon A. Erat changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #785633|Tarball containing |Tarball description|everything, not 'in' but| |with subdirs. | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YWuzzjywS9&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 835089] Review Request: Script-Tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835089 Simon A. Erat changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #785636|Package 'source' from my|Package 'source' description|build-host | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Fp16tG5j1E&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996061] Review Request: python-sphinx-theme-flask - Sphinx Themes for Flask related projects and Flask itself
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996061 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||cicku...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cicku...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Christopher Meng --- No problems. APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=oV3Y6yK1FP&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995974] Review Request: libbson - BSON library for C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
--- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt ---
Drive-by comments...
> %build
> ./autogen.sh
Check out the contents of that tiny script. Prefer using autoreconf directly,
so you can skip the duplicate and wrong configure invocation.
> %packagedevel
> BuildArch: noarch
Making it "noarch" is a fundamental packaging mistake, since it's a compiled
arch-specific library, and %_libdir is not /usr/lib for some target platforms.
> %packagepython
> Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} python >= 2.7
Easy to miss when multiple deps are on one line.
There's an automatic dependency for python(abi) already. The explicit one on
"python >= 2.7" is wrong. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python
> %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/%{name}-1.0.pc
It contains a hardcoded libdir=${exec_prefix}/lib which is wrong for build
targets where %_libdir is not /usr/lib but /usr/lib64.
> $ ls tests
> binary test-bson-clock.c test-bson-oid.c
> test-bson-writer.c
> bson-tests.htest-bson-error.c test-bson-reader.c test_cbson.py
> Makefile.include test-bson-iter.c test-bson-string.c
> test-bson.c test-bson-json.c test-bson-utf8.c
Is this suitable for a %check section?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qXzu07eGPr&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 991400] Review Request: myrulib - E-Book Library Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991400 --- Comment #6 from Antonio Trande --- (In reply to Vasiliy Glazov from comment #5) > Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/RussianFedora/myrulib/master/myrulib.spec > SRPM URL: > http://koji.russianfedora.ru/koji/getfile?taskID=83453&name=myrulib-0.29.14- > 4.fc20.R.src.rpm > > All bundled libraries removed. ... > Since I remove bundled libraries this files not compiled ant it's licenses > not used. Which have been removed ? I don't see any removal command in your .spec file. > Suffix .R present only in my srpm file. If you rebuild it .R will be removed > automattically. Read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Contributor: "As a Contributor, you should have already made a package which adheres to the Package Naming Guidelines and Packaging Guidelines." -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8Q0WBXCfTQ&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 953514] Review Request: varnish-vmod-querystring - QueryString VMOD for Varnish
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953514 --- Comment #10 from Ingvar Hagelund --- I haven't looked in detail on this yet, but if I understand you correctly, you have to get the source tree of varnish (like the .src.rpm, for example) to be able to build the vmod. Is this correct? There are several ways to accomplish this. One is to create a package varnish-devel, containing the complete source tree, including fedora patches. That is the easiest way out, I guess. Mark that the vmod at least during the varnish-3.x series, has to have a hard dependency on the varnish version it is built against. If there is different versions of varnish available, for example while an update is rushed out, the vmod might break unless it's updated at the same time. This is impractical, but I can't see any other solution. Coordination could happen via the varnish-dist email list, I guess. Ingvar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NoIFm9QrpX&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 991400] Review Request: myrulib - E-Book Library Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991400 --- Comment #7 from Vasiliy Glazov --- I add BuildRequires: bzip2-devel, and configure --without-icu --without-sqlite In buildlog http://koji.russianfedora.ru/koji/getfile?taskID=83453&name=build.log you can see Use Libxml2 parser library (default)? no Use Expat XML parser instead of Libxml2? yes Use FAXPP (Fast XML Pull Parser) library? no Use builtin BZip2 library?no Use builtin SQLite3 library? no Use ICU for unicode collation?no Use Cool Reader Engine? no Use system logger: syslog?no Include locale files into executable? no Include links to the online collections? yes Strip the executable file?no Link wxWidgets as a static library? no Bundled Bzip2 and SQLite3 removed from build process. Or I must remove them from sources? And I dont think that suffix .R in preliminary srpm change anything. You can take renamed srpm here https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1776041/myrulib-0.29.14-4.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=md9KGwEB59&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995864] Review Request: liblinear - Library for Large Linear Classification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995864 --- Comment #4 from Björn Esser --- (In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #3) > What I don't understand is why the Python subpackages don't use %?_isa? > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package > > $ rpm -qR python-liblinear|grep -v ^rpm > liblinear = 1.93-1.fc19 > python(abi) = 2.7 > > The Python module strictly needs the arch-specific lib using a specific > SONAME. Thanks for the hint, Michael! Didn't mind that, unfortunately. :( Fixed in updated spec-file below. # Changelog: * Mon Aug 12 2013 Björn Esser - 1.93-2 - build arched python-plugins - nuke hashbang from python-plugins * Sun Aug 11 2013 Björn Esser - 1.93-1 - Initial rpm release Urls: Spec URL: http://besser82.fedorapeople.org/review/liblinear.spec SRPM URL: http://besser82.fedorapeople.org/review/liblinear-1.93-2.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xXfCWKxUyX&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 866265] Review Request: opentrep - C++ API for parsing travel-focused requests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866265 --- Comment #10 from Denis Arnaud --- Many thanks, Michael, for that (piece of) review; it is already very valuable! I'll work on it asap, but probably not before next weekend (my day job keeps me quite busy these days). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pIdtOFflKG&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996061] Review Request: python-sphinx-theme-flask - Sphinx Themes for Flask related projects and Flask itself
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996061 Björn Esser changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Björn Esser --- Thanks for the review, Christopher. This was quiet a "quicky" :P # New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-sphinx-theme-flask Short Description: Sphinx Themes for Flask related projects and Flask itself Owners: besser82 Branches: el5 el6 f18 f19 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HBQDDC40zK&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996088] Review Request: python-pathtools - Pattern matching and various utilities for file systems paths
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996088 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cicku...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Christopher Meng --- Add BR: python-setuptools. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=jjR7lPg2lq&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 987622] Review Request: python-behave - Tools for the behaviour-driven development, Python style
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987622 Fabian Deutsch changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||996105 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Sm0anSHLP8&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 974737] Review Request: svni - Subversion interactive check-in wrapper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974737 --- Comment #15 from Christopher Meng --- My Makefile patch sent upstream; IO::FIle is a part of perl, not perl-IO-All. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1kwbfeU0aT&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 896193] Review Request: plank - A port of docky to Vala
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896193 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cicku...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=l1Pw5AXCPZ&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996059] Review Request: python-oslo-messaging - OpenStack common messaging library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996059 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||cicku...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Np5Zh5Y9id&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996088] Review Request: python-pathtools - Pattern matching and various utilities for file systems paths
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996088 --- Comment #2 from Björn Esser --- (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1) > Add BR: python-setuptools. Thanks for the hint! Updated spec and srpm without bumping revision. :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PRCdajaagu&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996059] Review Request: python-oslo-messaging - OpenStack common messaging library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996059 --- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng --- Please assign it if you intend to review it.(I'm not ;)) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4SOVBIEJtQ&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996088] Review Request: python-pathtools - Pattern matching and various utilities for file systems paths
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996088 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cicku...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng --- APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=DKxXzgQf9g&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857139] Review Request: jackson-module-mrbean - An extension that implements support for POJO type materialization
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857139 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). f20 not yet branched. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=834g1Qpffv&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857139] Review Request: jackson-module-mrbean - An extension that implements support for POJO type materialization
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857139 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qVy0lEKXE8&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 921797] Review Request: pypolicyd-spf - SPF Policy Server for Postfix (Python implementation)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921797 --- Comment #48 from Jon Ciesla --- Branch retirement is handled in pkgdb, not via SCM requests. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gzQyE7SuPh&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 921797] Review Request: pypolicyd-spf - SPF Policy Server for Postfix (Python implementation)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921797 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=eL5wv0EXd3&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 984248] Review Request: mingw-shapelib - MinGW Windows shapelib library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984248 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=oxffnW417Q&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 986615] Review Request: openstack-savanna - Apache Hadoop cluster management on OpenStack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986615 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=wbFntxz2vh&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 984248] Review Request: mingw-shapelib - MinGW Windows shapelib library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984248 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ce9W5XIIup&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 986615] Review Request: openstack-savanna - Apache Hadoop cluster management on OpenStack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986615 --- Comment #22 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4ojCijdqww&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 988545] Review Request: stout - C++ headers for building sturdy software
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988545 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=aobgr29S38&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 988545] Review Request: stout - C++ headers for building sturdy software
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988545 --- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Did not add bigdata as InitialCC, not a valid FAS account. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=AgygTMdIAs&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995542] Review Request: castor-maven-plugin - Maven plugin for Castor XML's code generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995542 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). f20 is not branched yet. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=BW2XgOZHSF&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995542] Review Request: castor-maven-plugin - Maven plugin for Castor XML's code generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995542 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=BJs5iB3od2&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996061] Review Request: python-sphinx-theme-flask - Sphinx Themes for Flask related projects and Flask itself
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996061 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nEMSYllGYH&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996061] Review Request: python-sphinx-theme-flask - Sphinx Themes for Flask related projects and Flask itself
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996061 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zOYMOlg2wA&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996088] Review Request: python-pathtools - Pattern matching and various utilities for file systems paths
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996088 Björn Esser changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Björn Esser --- Thanks for the review, Christopher. Can you set the review(+)-flag correctly, please? # New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-pathtools Short Description: Pattern matching and various utilities for file systems paths Owners: besser82 Branches: el5 el6 f18 f19 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1KX49nVJvr&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995974] Review Request: libbson - BSON library for C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974 --- Comment #11 from Mike Manilone --- Ah... So many problems :-) One more thing, "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cbson.so.0.0.0 cbson.so.0" are the core extension and should not be considered "private". Spec URL: http://people.midymidy.com/~ekd123/RPM/libbson.spec SRPM URL: http://people.midymidy.com/~ekd123/RPM/libbson-0.1.10-3.fc19.src.rpm Patches: http://people.midymidy.com/~ekd123/RPM/libbson.noerror.patch http://people.midymidy.com/~ekd123/RPM/libbson.AvoidHardcodedLibdir.patch http://people.midymidy.com/~ekd123/RPM/libbson.autogen.patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Nua8SGrYcr&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 988545] Review Request: stout - C++ headers for building sturdy software
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988545 Björn Esser changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||stout -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=TBEi7qsLa0&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 994152] Review Request: libprocess - Library that provides an actor style message-passing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994152 Björn Esser changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||libprocess -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=tkuMFTOczb&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996088] Review Request: python-pathtools - Pattern matching and various utilities for file systems paths
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996088 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla --- fedora-review flag not set to '+' -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xPyF834olc&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996088] Review Request: python-pathtools - Pattern matching and various utilities for file systems paths
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996088 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=QD6XlUGx0g&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995542] Review Request: castor-maven-plugin - Maven plugin for Castor XML's code generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995542 Mat Booth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2013-08-12 09:14:19 --- Comment #5 from Mat Booth --- Thanks, now built for all requested branches: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=456183 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ewm1GZmA28&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996061] Review Request: python-sphinx-theme-flask - Sphinx Themes for Flask related projects and Flask itself
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996061 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- python-sphinx-theme-flask-git20130715.1cc4468-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-sphinx-theme-flask-git20130715.1cc4468-1.el5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=oIiRhGt1FC&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996061] Review Request: python-sphinx-theme-flask - Sphinx Themes for Flask related projects and Flask itself
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996061 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=fi4iEuQuhX&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996061] Review Request: python-sphinx-theme-flask - Sphinx Themes for Flask related projects and Flask itself
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996061 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- python-sphinx-theme-flask-git20130715.1cc4468-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-sphinx-theme-flask-git20130715.1cc4468-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=dPUlooSnpe&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996061] Review Request: python-sphinx-theme-flask - Sphinx Themes for Flask related projects and Flask itself
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996061 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- python-sphinx-theme-flask-git20130715.1cc4468-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-sphinx-theme-flask-git20130715.1cc4468-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XvQfKyf1zo&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996061] Review Request: python-sphinx-theme-flask - Sphinx Themes for Flask related projects and Flask itself
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996061 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- python-sphinx-theme-flask-git20130715.1cc4468-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-sphinx-theme-flask-git20130715.1cc4468-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qxz5JJH5YI&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 991400] Review Request: myrulib - E-Book Library Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991400 --- Comment #8 from Antonio Trande --- (In reply to Vasiliy Glazov from comment #7) > I add BuildRequires: bzip2-devel, and configure --without-icu > --without-sqlite > In buildlog > http://koji.russianfedora.ru/koji/getfile?taskID=83453&name=build.log > you can see > Use Libxml2 parser library (default)? no > Use Expat XML parser instead of Libxml2? yes > Use FAXPP (Fast XML Pull Parser) library? no > Use builtin BZip2 library?no > Use builtin SQLite3 library? no > Use ICU for unicode collation?no > Use Cool Reader Engine? no > Use system logger: syslog?no > Include locale files into executable? no > Include links to the online collections? yes > Strip the executable file?no > Link wxWidgets as a static library? no > > Bundled Bzip2 and SQLite3 removed from build process. Or I must remove them > from sources? > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Treatment_Of_Bundled_Libraries :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NPS9D1sX9A&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995974] Review Request: libbson - BSON library for C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974 --- Comment #12 from Mike Manilone --- (In reply to Joshua Small from comment #7) > However, I'm unsure if your intention should involve filtering the library > out, or deliberately providing it. This libraray works well in *my* daily work so I package it... Just no official releases, though the version has grown to 0.1.10. According to the Fedora guidelines, perhaps I need to wait until an official release comes out. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=le5UX0i4KB&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 994859] Review Request: python-pygit2 - Python bindings for libgit2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994859 --- Comment #4 from Yohan Graterol --- Great job Christopher, but there is an error in the permissions. > python-pygit2.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm > /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/_pygit2.so 0775L > python3-pygit2.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm > /usr/lib64/python3.3/site-packages/_pygit2.cpython-33m.so 0775L Another observation, can you delete the .buildinfo file? > python-pygit2.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir > /usr/share/doc/python-pygit2-0.19.0/html/.buildinfo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Xc9rht4zoU&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 994859] Review Request: python-pygit2 - Python bindings for libgit2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994859
--- Comment #5 from Yohan Graterol ---
> find %{buildroot} -name '.buildinfo' -delete
Remember than the doc is not there!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=u9H0Kt3uoZ&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 959942] Review Request: irker - IRC Message Relay
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959942 Yohan Graterol changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||yohangratero...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|yohangratero...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Yohan Graterol --- Hello Christopher, Your package not installed! The SPEC file need another BR. (Mercurial) > grep -r 'import' > ... > irkerhook.py:from mercurial.node import short > irkerhook.py:from mercurial.templatefilters import person Please use the flags appropriate for "parallel make". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YxJFQCAndD&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 980908] Review Request: python-flask-principal - Identity management for Flask applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980908 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- python-flask-principal-0.4.0-5.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-flask-principal-0.4.0-5.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=rD2fbsY6RK&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
