[Bug 954108] Review Request: gimp-gap - The GIMP Animation Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954108 Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||l...@fedoraproject.org Depends On||1000885 (DESIGN-SW) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=yAUKSoFEsCa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 988102] Review Request: perl-DBD-Sybase - this package provides an interface for perl to connect with Sybase and MSSql databases
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988102 --- Comment #14 from Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com --- Marcus, are you alive? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=9VefnGK9qHa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 924682] Review Request: gimp-elsamuko - Elsamukos script collection for the GIMP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924682 Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||l...@fedoraproject.org Depends On||1000885 (DESIGN-SW) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ymjyMPzApea=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 951496] Review Request: gimp-lensfun - gimp plugin to correct lens distortion
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951496 Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||l...@fedoraproject.org Depends On||1000885 (DESIGN-SW) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Rx5Ey2QfXTa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 954108] Review Request: gimp-gap - The GIMP Animation Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954108 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cicku...@gmail.com --- Comment #24 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- Status? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=irRhG5vYB4a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 951827] Review Request: alef-fonts - A free multi-lingual font designed for screens
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951827
Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||l...@fedoraproject.org
--- Comment #1 from Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org ---
Hello Elad,
Quick review:
- remove rm -fr %{buildroot} within #install
- %clean section is not required in F13 and above according to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25clean
- Why BuildRequires: dos2unix? multilingual
- Why including OFL-license.txt in %build section?
- rpmlint generated two warnings:
alef-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) multi - mulch, mufti
alef-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi - mulch,
mufti
Both Summary and %description should use US English: multi-lingual should be
multilingual.
- Add %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf after this line
ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf}
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=S8uK3AUjK7a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 951496] Review Request: gimp-lensfun - gimp plugin to correct lens distortion
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951496 Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1000885 (DESIGN-SW) Depends On|1000885 (DESIGN-SW) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=i2vYFqnZfJa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 902024] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf-psd - GdkPixbuf loader for the PSD file format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902024 Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||l...@fedoraproject.org Blocks||1000885 (DESIGN-SW) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FiZgI2Q6oNa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 906443] Review Request: tupi - 2D vector-based animation environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906443 Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||l...@fedoraproject.org Blocks||1000885 (DESIGN-SW) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vXwe1DErCTa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 978177] Review Request: birdfont - A editor for creating outline vector graphics and exporting fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978177 Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||l...@fedoraproject.org Blocks||1000885 (DESIGN-SW) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HW5pubhJ2za=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 759818] (buffer) Review Request: buffer - General purpose buffer program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759818 Bruno Cornec bruno.cor...@hp.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|package-review@lists.fedora | |project.org | --- Comment #4 from Bruno Cornec bruno.cor...@hp.com --- Could you try with a CLI ftp tool to check ? I have no problem from home to access to it (hosted at work) neither yesterday when I answered, nor today. It's an ftp server (upstream of the project) I also made updated versions for fedora 18 and 19, as well at ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/19/x86_64/buffer-1.19-4.fc19.src.rpm and ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/19/x86_64/afio.spec My FAS account is bcornec. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=u3rk4oHs6aa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 989400] Review Request: rubygem-mini_portile - Simplistic port-like solution for developers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989400 Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|package-review@lists.fedora | |project.org | Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|vondr...@redhat.com QA Contact|vondr...@redhat.com |extras...@fedoraproject.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Alj0dx0x3ba=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957339] Review Request: openerp7 - Business Applications Server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957339 --- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- Requires(post): systemd-units Requires(preun): systemd-units Requires(postun): systemd-units You should migrate to F18+ style: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Systemd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=awoAyf5mxfa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957339] Review Request: openerp7 - Business Applications Server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957339 --- Comment #4 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com --- Indeed, thanks! Updated in-place, same links. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=tfD8D7wof9a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 951827] Review Request: alef-fonts - A free multi-lingual font designed for screens
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951827
Elad Alfassa el...@doom.co.il changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org |
--- Comment #2 from Elad Alfassa el...@doom.co.il ---
(In reply to Luya Tshimbalanga from comment #1)
Hello Elad,
Quick review:
- remove rm -fr %{buildroot} within #install
- %clean section is not required in F13 and above according to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25clean
Right. Will fix soon.
- Why BuildRequires: dos2unix?
Upstream shipped the OFL-license.txt file with DOS line endings. rpmlint will
complain if the package has files with DOS line endings. dos2unix converts DOS
line endings to unix line endings.
- Why including OFL-license.txt in %build section?
Does it really matter if it's in build or prep?
- rpmlint generated two warnings:
alef-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) multi - mulch, mufti
alef-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi - mulch,
mufti
Both Summary and %description should use US English: multi-lingual should be
multilingual.
That's a nitpick, but okay, will do.
- Add %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf after this line
ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf}
I already have this line, you didn't notice it because it's after %clean
Thanks for the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PAi9zSRnpKa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 991292] Review Request: pyhoca-cli - Command line X2Go client written in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991292 Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||leamas.a...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|leamas.a...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com --- OK, I'll make a shot here as well, Who knows, maybe someone might take a look at bug 957339... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=jAXTZNGIx2a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 998915] Review Request: rubygem-wirb - Wavy IRB: Colorizes irb results
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998915
Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org |
CC||package-review@lists.fedora
||project.org
--- Comment #4 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org ---
For -4:
* SourceURL
- Plese specify full URL for Source0
* Virtual (Build)Requires is preferred
- Using rubygem(rspec) is preferred than rubygem-rspec for
BuildRequires (however you may want to comment it out
for now anyway)
* %gem_install availability
- %gem_install macro is available on F-18 and above
(you can change to %if 0%{?fedora} = 18)
* Documentation
- I recommend to move README.rdoc to main package because
it says README.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XJSZa9k5Y9a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 972323] Review Request: hazelcast - Hazelcast CE In-Memory DataGrid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972323 --- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1) Please update to 3.0.1. i don't know if 3.x series is again compatible with my intents (Apache Camel) for 2.x series is available a new release more fresh than 3.0.1 sorry, why you suggest 3.x? regards -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1UYVnix8T3a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 998915] Review Request: rubygem-wirb - Wavy IRB: Colorizes irb results
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998915 --- Comment #5 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com --- Updated. Spec URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rubygem-wirb/rubygem-wirb.spec SRPM URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rubygem-wirb/rubygem-wirb-1.0.1-5.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=DGS3My3X9ma=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1000334] Review Request: rubygem-single_test - Rake tasks to invoke single tests/specs with rakish syntax
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000334 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|package-review@lists.fedora | |project.org | --- Comment #12 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com --- I prefer to have them in pkgdocdir. See my recent proposal. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ruby-sig/2013-August/001418.html I put symlink into gem_instdir Spec URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rubygem-single_test/rubygem-single_test.spec SRPM URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rubygem-single_test/rubygem-single_test-0.6.0-5.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=e7Mdvt2AI3a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 929254] Review Request: perl-Module-CPANfile - Parse cpanfile
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=929254
--- Comment #6 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Spec file changes:
--- perl-Module-CPANfile.spec 2013-08-27 12:38:33.0 +0200
+++ perl-Module-CPANfile.spec.1 2013-08-27 16:43:42.0 +0200
@@ -1,27 +1,38 @@
Name: perl-Module-CPANfile
Version:1.0001
-Release:1%{?dist}
+Release:2%{?dist}
Summary:Parse cpanfile
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-CPANfile/
Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/M/MI/MIYAGAWA/Module-CPANfile-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildArch: noarch
+BuildRequires: perl
+BuildRequires: perl(base)
BuildRequires: perl(Carp)
BuildRequires: perl(Cwd)
BuildRequires: perl(CPAN::Meta) = 2.12091
BuildRequires: perl(CPAN::Meta::Prereqs) = 2.12091
BuildRequires: perl(CPAN::Meta::Feature) = 2.12091
-BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) = 6.30
+BuildRequires: perl(strict)
+BuildRequires: perl(warnings)
# tests
BuildRequires: perl(Exporter)
BuildRequires: perl(POSIX)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) = 0.88
BuildRequires: perl(Pod::Usage)
+Requires: perl(CPAN::Meta) = 2.12091
Requires: perl(CPAN::Meta::Prereqs) = 2.12091
+Requires: perl(CPAN::Meta::Feature) = 2.12091
+Requires: perl(Data::Dumper)
+Requires: perl(Pod::Usage)
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
+%?perl_default_filter
+%global __requires_exclude
%{?__requires_exclude:%__requires_exclude|}perl\\(CPAN::Meta\\)$
+
%description
Module::CPANfile is a tool to handle cpanfile format to load application
specific dependencies, not just for CPAN distributions.
@@ -30,14 +41,13 @@
%setup -q -n Module-CPANfile-%{version}
%build
-%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
+perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
make %{?_smp_mflags}
%install
make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
-find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \;
%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
@@ -45,12 +55,15 @@
make test
%files
-%doc Changes cpanfile dist.ini LICENSE META.json README
+%doc Changes LICENSE README
%{_bindir}/mymeta-cpanfile
%{perl_vendorlib}/*
%{_mandir}/man1/mymeta-cpanfile*
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Tue Aug 27 2013 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 1.0001-2
+- fix all problems found in review rhbz#929254
+
* Tue Aug 27 2013 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 1.0001-1
- Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.78.
TODO: You can use plain `perl' instead of macro `%{__perl}'.
TODO: You can do that same at perl(:MODULE_COMPAT) definition.
TODO: You can remove deleting empty directories in the %install section.
These are not created anymore.
-find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \;
Ok.
TODO: Do not package cpanfile, dist.ini. They do not contain any data relevant
to an user. META.json is questionable. It lists all contributors and git
repository link.
-%doc Changes cpanfile dist.ini LICENSE META.json README
+%doc Changes LICENSE README
Ok.
TODO: Constrain `perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)' build-dependency with `= 6.30'
(Makefile.PL:7).
-BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) = 6.30
Ok.
TODO: Build-require `perl(strict)' (Makefile.PL:2).
+BuildRequires: perl(strict)
Ok.
TODO: Build-require `perl(warnings)' (Makefile.PL:3).
+BuildRequires: perl(warnings)
Ok.
FIX: Build-require `perl(Data::Dumper)' (lib/Module/CPANfile.pm:115).
FIX: still issue.
TODO: Build-require `perl(base)' (t/Utils.pm:2).
+BuildRequires: perl(base)
Ok.
FIX: Do not build-require `perl(Pod::Usage)'. It's not needed at build-time.
FIX: still issue.
FIX: Constrain `perl(CPAN::Meta)' run-dependency with `= 2.12091'.
+Requires: perl(CPAN::Meta) = 2.12091
Ok.
FIX: Run-require `perl(CPAN::Meta::Feature) = 2.12091'
(lib/Module/CPANfile.pm:63).
+Requires: perl(CPAN::Meta::Feature) = 2.12091
Ok.
FIX: Run-require `perl(Data::Dumper)' (lib/Module/CPANfile.pm:115).
+Requires: perl(Data::Dumper)
Ok.
FIX: Run-require `perl(Pod::Usage)' (script/mymeta-cpanfile:20).
+Requires: perl(Pod::Usage)
Ok.
$ rpmlint perl-Module-CPANfile.spec
../SRPMS/perl-Module-CPANfile-1.0001-2.fc21.src.rpm
../RPMS/noarch/perl-Module-CPANfile-1.0001-2.fc21.noarch.rpm
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint is Ok.
$ rpm -q --requires -p
../RPMS/noarch/perl-Module-CPANfile-1.0001-2.fc21.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c
1 /usr/bin/perl
1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.1)
1 perl(CPAN::Meta) = 2.12091
1 perl(CPAN::Meta::Feature) = 2.12091
1 perl(CPAN::Meta::Prereqs) = 2.12091
1 perl(Carp)
1 perl(Cwd)
1 perl(Data::Dumper)
1 perl(Getopt::Long)
1 perl(Module::CPANfile)
1
[Bug 991292] Review Request: pyhoca-cli - Command line X2Go client written in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991292
--- Comment #2 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
The URL:s are incomplete making fedora-review unhappy.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- Fix the rpmlint warning about mixed spaces and tabs,
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
AGPL (v3 or later). Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/mk/FedoraReview/pyhoca-cli/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[-]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[-]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[-]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[-]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[!] Package installs properly.
Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
Requires nxproxy, not a problem.
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[-]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no
[Bug 1001984] Review Request: rubygem-text - Collection of text algorithms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001984
--- Comment #3 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org ---
Thank you for initial comments:
(In reply to Miroslav Suchý from comment #2)
*I* would include in -doc:
%{gem_instdir}/Rakefile
%{gem_instdir}/test/
- For now I decided not to include this.
Can you please include
https://raw.github.com/threedaymonk/text/master/COPYING.txt
as SOURCE1?
- Added this (note that in Source0 I renamed this so as
not to make files' names duplicate when multiple srpm
are expanded)
Otherwise it looks good.
http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-text/rubygem-text.spec
http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-text/rubygem-text-1.2.3-2.fc.src.rpm
* Fri Aug 30 2013 Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org - 1.2.3-2
- Include license text
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=kNEX6lyFhqa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1000334] Review Request: rubygem-single_test - Rake tasks to invoke single tests/specs with rakish syntax
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000334 Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||package-review@lists.fedora ||project.org Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org --- Approving. - This package (rubygem-single_test) is APPROVED by mtasaka -- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=995N3FeKoCa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001984] Review Request: rubygem-text - Collection of text algorithms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001984 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com --- APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=tRSUKztzXWa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 915916] Review Request: qt5-qtimageformats - Qt5 - QtImageFormats component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915916 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Already exists in devel only with than as owner. Add other owners in pkgdb and submit a Package Change request for the other branches. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=aQXeaMjBdta=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 915916] Review Request: qt5-qtimageformats - Qt5 - QtImageFormats component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915916 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LdewIXJo2oa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 915916] Review Request: qt5-qtimageformats - Qt5 - QtImageFormats component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915916 --- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- That's very strange. How/when did that happen? This package only just got reviewed and approved... And, $ fedpkg clone qt5-qtimageformats Cloning into 'qt5-qtimageformats'... fatal: '/srv/git/rpms//qt5-qtimageformats.git' does not appear to be a git repository fatal: Could not read from remote repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6qpzg4YvPoa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 969212] Review Request: x2goclient - Graphical client for use with the X2Go network based computing environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969212 --- Comment #3 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com --- Here are build errors on rawhide: Traceback (most recent call last): File setup.py, line 37, in module from setuptools import setup, find_packages ImportError: No module named setuptools Missing BR:... Also, the qtbrowserplugin contains seems to contain BSD-licensed code. Unless not shipped, this affects the license. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pDc8xKTgspa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 972323] Review Request: hazelcast - Hazelcast CE In-Memory DataGrid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972323 --- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/hazelcast.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/hazelcast-2.6.2-1.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=31IdXOdLeNa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001984] Review Request: rubygem-text - Collection of text algorithms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001984 Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org --- Thank you! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: rubygem-text Short Description: Collection of text algorithms Owners: mtasaka Branches: f18 f19 f20 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qSswCLTKuca=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1000334] Review Request: rubygem-single_test - Rake tasks to invoke single tests/specs with rakish syntax
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000334 --- Comment #14 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com --- Thank you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=m3llS6wxPqa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1000334] Review Request: rubygem-single_test - Rake tasks to invoke single tests/specs with rakish syntax
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000334 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: rubygem-single_test Short Description: Rake tasks to invoke single tests/specs with rakish syntax Owners: msuchy Branches: f19 f20 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=WcMPmnSDZra=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1002994] New: Review Request: QMsgBox - Solves a problem that prevents qt message icons from being displayed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002994
Bug ID: 1002994
Summary: Review Request: QMsgBox - Solves a problem that
prevents qt message icons from being displayed
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
Reporter: susi.leht...@iki.fi
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/QMsgBox.spec
SRPM URL:
http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/QMsgBox-0-1.20130830git94677dc.fc19.src.rpm
Description:
QMsgBox is a class that inherits QMessageBox to replace the static
functions:
* QMessageBox::warning
* QMessageBox::information
* QMessageBox::critical
* QMessageBox::question
All other functions remain the same. The usage of the replaced
function also remains the same.
The objective of this class is to solve a problem that prevents the
message icon from being displayed in some platforms with some Qt
styles.
Fedora Account System Username: jussilehtola
rpmlint output:
QMsgBox-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
QMsgBox.src:43: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %prep sed -i s|target.path =
/usr/lib|target.path = %{buildroot}%{_libdir}|g src/src.pro
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
These are non-issues.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=QdsRYGBQoLa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1000334] Review Request: rubygem-single_test - Rake tasks to invoke single tests/specs with rakish syntax
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000334 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xaku3KCs63a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1000334] Review Request: rubygem-single_test - Rake tasks to invoke single tests/specs with rakish syntax
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000334 --- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Q7P7S9IpFBa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001984] Review Request: rubygem-text - Collection of text algorithms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001984 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MfsO9h1WG0a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001984] Review Request: rubygem-text - Collection of text algorithms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001984 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0ncrvD0Y9Ia=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1000334] Review Request: rubygem-single_test - Rake tasks to invoke single tests/specs with rakish syntax
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000334 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ACAarbFS3na=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1000334] Review Request: rubygem-single_test - Rake tasks to invoke single tests/specs with rakish syntax
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000334 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- rubygem-single_test-0.6.0-5.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-single_test-0.6.0-5.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FuOms9vdtMa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 984175] Review Request: IQmol - A free open-source molecular editor and visualization package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984175 Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1002994 --- Comment #10 from Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi --- Removed bundled QMsgBox. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/IQmol.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/IQmol-2.2.0-4.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=TtxzmHBPZwa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1002994] Review Request: QMsgBox - Solves a problem that prevents qt message icons from being displayed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002994 Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||984175 (IQmol) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2SEd9Rr0nRa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1002994] Review Request: QMsgBox - Solves a problem that prevents qt message icons from being displayed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002994 Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||QMsgBox -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MFYAJdCnL7a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 998915] Review Request: rubygem-wirb - Wavy IRB: Colorizes irb results
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998915 Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org --- Approving. This package (rubygem-wirb) is APPROVED by mtasaka -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Vqa2VpPYzia=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 998915] Review Request: rubygem-wirb - Wavy IRB: Colorizes irb results
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998915 --- Comment #7 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com --- Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=GchlyvS7QPa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 915916] Review Request: qt5-qtimageformats - Qt5 - QtImageFormats component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915916 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- Package Change Request == Package Name: qt5-qtimageformats New Branches: f18 f19 f20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ReqdlfBdnOa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 998915] Review Request: rubygem-wirb - Wavy IRB: Colorizes irb results
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998915 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: rubygem-wirb Short Description: Wavy IRB: Colorizes irb results Owners: msuchy Branches: f19 f20 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=yctsgb8pMma=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1003009] New: Review Request: gnome-colors-icon-theme - GNOME-Colors icon theme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003009 Bug ID: 1003009 Summary: Review Request: gnome-colors-icon-theme - GNOME-Colors icon theme Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mhron...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/hroncok/SPECS/master/gnome-colors-icon-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/gnome-colors-icon-theme-5.5.1-4.fc19.src.rpm Description: The GNOME-Colors is a project that aims to make the GNOME desktop as elegant, consistent and colorful as possible. The current goal is to allow full color customization of themes, icons, GDM logins and splash screens. There are already seven full color-schemes available; Brave (Blue), Human (Orange), Wine (Red), Noble (Purple), Wise (Green), Dust (Chocolate) and Illustrious (Pink). An unlimited amount of color variations can be rebuilt and recolored from source, so users need not stick to the officially supported color palettes. GNOME-Colors is mostly inspired/based on Tango, GNOME, Elementary, Tango-Generator and many other open-source projects. More information can be found in the AUTHORS file. Fedora Account System Username: churchyard This is a retake of bz515280 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=OIQmxmuurra=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 915916] Review Request: qt5-qtimageformats - Qt5 - QtImageFormats component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915916 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- No owners listed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Uib098AtE2a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 915916] Review Request: qt5-qtimageformats - Qt5 - QtImageFormats component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915916 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1wL9UW7BPma=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 998915] Review Request: rubygem-wirb - Wavy IRB: Colorizes irb results
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998915 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|package-review@lists.fedora | |project.org | Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Qjmt56cqbXa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 915916] Review Request: qt5-qtimageformats - Qt5 - QtImageFormats component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915916 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- Package Change Request == Package Name: pkgname New Branches: f18 f19 f20 Owners: than rdieter jreznik kkofler ltinkl rnovacek -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xuH78GSo0la=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 915916] Review Request: qt5-qtimageformats - Qt5 - QtImageFormats component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915916 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Corrected name. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=T3Y2p3E0C8a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 915916] Review Request: qt5-qtimageformats - Qt5 - QtImageFormats component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915916 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=jIC2LgqwUea=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 991286] Review Request: pyhoca-gui - Graphical X2Go client written in (wx)Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991286 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|package-review@lists.fedora | |project.org | Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: pyhoca-gui Short Description: Graphical X2Go client written in (wx)Python Owners: orion Branches: f20 f19 f18 el6 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=i6Pf8i3eBsa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 929254] Review Request: perl-Module-CPANfile - Parse cpanfile
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=929254 --- Comment #7 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com --- SPEC: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Module-CPANfile.spec SRPM: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Module-CPANfile-1.0001-3.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pdPTFB7b4Ga=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 969212] Review Request: x2goclient - Graphical client for use with the X2Go network based computing environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969212 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||limburg...@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Built, installed, runs, but connection failed, x2golistsessions: command not found -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YJyPkFSmDJa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725733] Review Request: rubygem-closure-compiler - Ruby Wrapper for the Google Closure Compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725733 Bug 725733 depends on bug 725739, which changed state. Bug 725739 Summary: Java dependencies for rubygems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725739 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=KFgRjvWZM1a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725768] Review Request: rubygem-yui-compressor - JavaScript and CSS minification library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725768 Bug 725768 depends on bug 725739, which changed state. Bug 725739 Summary: Java dependencies for rubygems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725739 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=74e7wG6O7qa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 958794] subcommander: request for reinstatement
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958794 Steve st...@digidescorp.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Flags|needinfo?(steve@digidescorp | |.com) | Last Closed||2013-08-30 10:53:38 --- Comment #6 from Steve st...@digidescorp.com --- When I opened this I was hoping that patches that fixed the FTBFS and major crash issues could be folded in to the previous infrastructure and that there was a switch that could be thrown to turn builds back on. I guess what you're saying is that a new maintainer is needed to do this. As you might guess by delays in responding this is not something I can take on; with the limited time I have I will focus on generating upstream builds that work. So I guess the NEWS is that we would need someone to step in and adopt this package as a Fedora packager. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=eHsteBCNMfa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 969212] Review Request: x2goclient - Graphical client for use with the X2Go network based computing environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969212 --- Comment #5 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com --- Built it ok on F18, I guess Jon built on F19. My errors was from a F20/rawhide build in mock -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pijyzrNwm5a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1003057] New: Review Request: irstlm - Statistical language model tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003057 Bug ID: 1003057 Summary: Review Request: irstlm - Statistical language model tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: loganje...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/irstlm/irstlm.spec SRPM URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/irstlm/irstlm-5.80.03-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: Irstlm is a tool for the estimation, representation, and computation of statistical language models. Fedora Account System Username: jjames -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=clDrHG8gfWa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 969212] Review Request: x2goclient - Graphical client for use with the X2Go network based computing environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969212 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|package-review@lists.fedora | |project.org | --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Ah, no, I was attempting a connection to a freenx server. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4Z96IfXNSra=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 969212] Review Request: x2goclient - Graphical client for use with the X2Go network based computing environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969212 --- Comment #7 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com --- (In reply to Jon Ciesla from comment #4) Built, installed, runs, but connection failed, x2golistsessions: command not found Are you connecting to an x2goserver instance? It's not expected to be able to connect to a regular nx server. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0O1zZmGw5aa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1002692] Review Request: rubygem-shoulda-context - Context framework extracted from Shoulda
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002692 Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|package-review@lists.fedora | |project.org | --- Comment #8 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com --- (In reply to Shawn Starr from comment #5) One issue noted: ./usr/bin/convert_to_should_syntax AND ./usr/share/gems/gems/shoulda-context-1.1.5/bin/convert_to_should_syntax Is there a reason for both? From what I understand, it's the convention to include both in the package. See rubygem-bundler for an example of this, where bundle exists at /usr/bin and /usr/share/gems/gems/bundler-1.3.1/bin . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XLSnVyTX10a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 969212] Review Request: x2goclient - Graphical client for use with the X2Go network based computing environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969212 --- Comment #6 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com --- (In reply to Alec Leamas from comment #3) Here are build errors on rawhide: Traceback (most recent call last): File setup.py, line 37, in module from setuptools import setup, find_packages ImportError: No module named setuptools Missing BR:... I think you have the wrong package - no setup.py here... Also, the qtbrowserplugin contains seems to contain BSD-licensed code. Unless not shipped, this affects the license. Nope: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:FAQ?rd=Licensing/FAQ#How_should_I_handle_multiple_licensing_situations.3F but I do need to file for a bundling exception. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=L4Kg4zHGNla=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1003089] New: Review Request: glusterfs-openstack-swift - Gluster for Swift
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003089 Bug ID: 1003089 Summary: Review Request: glusterfs-openstack-swift - Gluster for Swift Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: lpa...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://github.com/lpabon/fedora/raw/master/1.8.0/glusterfs-openstack-swift.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/lpabon/fedora/raw/master/1.8.0/glusterfs-openstack-swift-1.8.0-7.1.fc19.src.rpm Description: Gluster-For-Swift (G4S, pronounced gee-force) integrates GlusterFS as an alternative back end for OpenStack Object Storage (Swift) leveraging the existing front end OpenStack Swift code. Gluster volumes are used to store objects in files, containers are maintained as top-level directories of volumes, where accounts are mapped one-to-one to gluster volumes. Fedora Account System Username: lpabon -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5ZkjtqX78pa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1003094] New: Review Request: python-xml2rfc - Python module for converting IETF RFC-2629 XML into txt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003094 Bug ID: 1003094 Summary: Review Request: python-xml2rfc - Python module for converting IETF RFC-2629 XML into txt Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: pwout...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: ftp://ftp.nohats.ca/python-xml2rfc/python-xml2rfc.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.nohats.ca/python-xml2rfc/python-xml2rfc-2.4.2-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: Xml2rfc generates RFCs and IETF drafts from document source in XML according to the dtd in RFC-2629. It takes as input an xml file which contains the text and meta-information about author names etc., and transforms it into suitably formatted output. The input xml file should follow the DTD given in RFC-2629 (or it's inofficial successor). Fedora Account System Username: pwouters -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=UeUY5JbQYIa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 955996] Review Request: wkhtmltopdf-qt - Customized version of the QT toolkit for generating PDFs using Web-kit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=955996 Peter Larsen plar...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||plar...@redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Peter Larsen plar...@redhat.com --- The tool seems to be very limited without QT - from the doc: Items marked * are only available using patched QT. --image-dpi * integer When embedding images scale them down to --image-quality * integer When jpeg compressing images use this --no-pdf-compression *Do not use lossless compression on pdf --use-xserver * Use the X server (some plugins and other --dump-default-toc-xsl * Dump the default TOC xsl style sheet to --dump-outline * file Dump the outline to a file --outline * Put an outline into the pdf (default) --no-outline *Do not put an outline into the pdf --outline-depth * level Set the depth of the outline (default 4) --default-header *Add a default header, with the name of the --disable-external-links *Do not make links to remote web pages --enable-external-links * Make links to remote web pages (default) --disable-forms * Do not turn HTML form fields into pdf form --enable-forms * Turn HTML form fields into pdf form fields --disable-internal-links *Do not make local links --enable-internal-links * Make local links (default) --exclude-from-outline * Do not include the page in the table of --include-in-outline *Include the page in the table of contents --print-media-type * Use print media-type instead of screen --no-print-media-type * Do not use print media-type instead of --disable-smart-shrinking * Disable the intelligent shrinking strategy --enable-smart-shrinking *Enable the intelligent shrinking strategy --disable-toc-back-links *Do not link from section header to toc --enable-toc-back-links * Link from section header to toc --footer-center * text Centered footer text --footer-font-name * name Set footer font name (default Arial) --footer-font-size * size Set footer font size (default 12) --footer-html * url Adds a html footer --footer-left * textLeft aligned footer text --footer-line * Display line above the footer --no-footer-line *Do not display line above the footer --footer-right * text Right aligned footer text --footer-spacing * real Spacing between footer and content in mm --header-center * text Centered header text --header-font-name * name Set header font name (default Arial) --header-font-size * size Set header font size (default 12) --header-html * url Adds a html header --header-left * textLeft aligned header text --header-line * Display line below the header --no-header-line *Do not display line below the header --header-right * text Right aligned header text --header-spacing * real Spacing between header and content in mm --replace * name valueReplace [name] with value in header and --disable-dotted-lines * Do not use dottet lines in the toc --toc-header-text * textThe header text of the toc (default Table --toc-level-indentation * width For each level of headings in the toc --disable-toc-links * Do not link from toc to sections --toc-text-size-shrink * real For each level of headings in the toc the --xsl-style-sheet * fileUse the supplied xsl style sheet for None of these options work - most important (to me) is being able to follow links. You get either core dumps or error messages with most features of the tool, saying the QT version isn't available. I'm not specifically married to wkhtmltopdf - if a similar tool exist I'm happy to shift. Only found python-xhtml2pdf - and it seems very limited, such as no support for following (local) links. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vJj8rszrypa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1003094] Review Request: python-xml2rfc - Python module for converting IETF RFC-2629 XML into txt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003094
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
||m
--- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
The tarball contains a bundled egg-info which has to be removed for building
the package:
rm -rf %{namewithoutpythonprefix}.egg-info
See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python_Eggs#Upstream_Eggs for more
information.
PKG-INFO shouldn't be added to %doc. It is present from the egg-info anyway.
Its content is similar to README and doesn't provide any additional info.
%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
The initial cleaning of buildroot is no longer needed because it is default
anyway. It is only needed (probably...?) for EPEL5 packages.
%{python_sitelib}/%{namewithoutpythonprefix}/templates/*
%{python_sitelib}/%{namewithoutpythonprefix}/*.py*
%{python_sitelib}/%{namewithoutpythonprefix}/writers/*.py*
The folders %{python_sitelib}/%{namewithoutpythonprefix}/templates/ and
%{python_sitelib}/%{namewithoutpythonprefix}/writers/ stay unowned. Actually it
should be sufficient to just write
%{python_sitelib}/%{namewithoutpythonprefix}/*
to own the whole folder, its subfolders and the content.
Summary:Python module for...
The package name already says that it is a Python module, you might write
instead:
Summary:Converting IETF RFC-2629 XML into txt
What about to run the tests in ./tests in a %check section?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pHLW2CleyBa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 915916] Review Request: qt5-qtimageformats - Qt5 - QtImageFormats component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915916 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC|package-review@lists.fedora | |project.org | Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2013-08-30 10:40:30 --- Comment #12 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- gosh, sorry, thanks! imported. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=JpYBoWwQd8a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658754] Review Request: cubrid - a very fast and reliable open source SQL database server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658754 Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC|package-review@lists.fedora | |project.org | --- Comment #63 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net --- A few more comments: * The Explicit Requires from comment 33 should be reviewed and dropped in favour of the automatic dependencies on library names. At least for ncurses, gc, lzo, and pcre I see corresponding -devel BuildRequires and assume they result in automatic libname deps: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Explicit_Requires Where there are no automatic deps, add comments as explained in the guidelines, and also re-review the BuildRequires. For example, PCRE library is disabled appears in the build output. * Several libs are bundled. Configure output says the builtin lib will be used - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries * Have you tried running the fedora-review tool for this package yet? BuildRequires: systemd-units Prefer BuildRequires: systemd which is the package that contains the RPM macros. build.log It's huge. In many places Fedora's compiler flags aren't used. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Compiler_flags In some places the build output is not verbose. Hence one cannot verify whether the compiler flags. I haven't checked how to make it more verbose. Sometimes one can configure with --disable-silent-rules, in other cases running V=1 make … works. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=27pUwqC4bza=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001865] Review Request: rubygem-parse-cron - Parses cron expressions and calculates the next occurrence
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001865 Shawn Starr shawn.st...@rogers.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Shawn Starr shawn.st...@rogers.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: rubygem-parse-cron Short Description: Parses cron expressions and calculates the next occurrence Owners: spstarr Branches: f19 f20 f21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8fBGF09yhRa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1000334] Review Request: rubygem-single_test - Rake tasks to invoke single tests/specs with rakish syntax
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000334 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|package-review@lists.fedora | |project.org | Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- rubygem-single_test-0.6.0-5.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Lbhp2dYWoZa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 966324] Review Request: codecrypt - The post-quantum cryptography tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966324 Bug 966324 depends on bug 969387, which changed state. Bug 969387 Summary: Review Request: freetiger - Free implementation of the tiger hash algorithm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969387 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=dL4bS8pi0ha=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 966201] Review Request: tnftp - FTP (File Transfer Protocol) client from NetBSD
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966201 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|tnftp-20130505-4.fc19 |tnftp-20130505-4.el6 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- tnftp-20130505-4.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8aTswyfi9ha=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 906443] Review Request: tupi - 2D vector-based animation environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906443 Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|656997 (kde-reviews)|928937 (qt-reviews) --- Comment #8 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org --- We have a dedicated tracker for Qt-only packages like this now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MF2EPfognBa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 989847] Review Request: mingw-plibc - MinGW package for plibc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989847 Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||989850 --- Comment #3 from Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com --- Upstream has removed the violating code. New spec: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/mingw-plibc.spec New SRPM: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/mingw-plibc-0.1.7-1.0.20130812svn.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bRQImyfPaYa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 989850] Review Request: mingw-libmicrohttpd - MinGW package for libmicrohttpd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989850 Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||989847 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=fcmW240Hf3a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 989850] Review Request: mingw-libmicrohttpd - MinGW package for libmicrohttpd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989850 --- Comment #5 from Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com --- Upstream did not accept the patches to remove the dependency on PlibC, but have accepted the other fixes. New spec: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/mingw-libmicrohttpd.spec New SRPM: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/mingw-libmicrohttpd-0.9.27-4.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=3EyGcbTScEa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 991292] Review Request: pyhoca-cli - Command line X2Go client written in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991292 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|package-review@lists.fedora | |project.org | --- Comment #3 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com --- Sorry: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/nx/pyhoca-cli.spec http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/nx/pyhoca-cli-0.4.0.1-2.fc19.src.rpm * Fri Aug 30 2013 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com - 0.4.0.1-2 - Change tabs to spaces -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=cvrh5cK7G7a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 990815] Review Request: x2godesktopsharing - Share X2go desktops with other users
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990815 Bug 990815 depends on bug 969220, which changed state. Bug 969220 Summary: Review Request: x2goserver - Server for use with the X2Go network based computing environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969220 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=IosF5XEqdNa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 969220] Review Request: x2goserver - Server for use with the X2Go network based computing environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969220 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2013-08-31 00:12:48 --- Comment #7 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com --- Checked in and built -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zU8ifSF65Aa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 990817] Review Request: python-x2go - Python module providing X2Go client API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990817 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2013-08-31 00:15:46 --- Comment #6 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com --- Checked in and built -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xLOv0PM7Oca=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 990815] Review Request: x2godesktopsharing - Share X2go desktops with other users
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990815 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2013-08-31 00:17:30 --- Comment #8 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com --- Checked in and built -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gCSz4Oh8Voa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 999959] Review Request: zmap - Network scanner for Internet-wide network studies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=59 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|package-review@lists.fedora | |project.org | --- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Mario Blättermann from comment #3) Please fix the wrong line endings in /usr/share/doc/zmap/examples/banner-grab/http-req. Quoted from upstream: This file ends with \r\n\r\n, two CRLF sequences as per the HTTP specification. Having only one will cause standard-compliant HTTP servers to withhold sending a response, as it expects additional headers (or the final CRLF) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=JQtOIM4y0Ta=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
