[Bug 1015701] Review Request: amiri-fonts - Arabic font form amirifont.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015701 --- Comment #32 from Khaled Hosny --- (In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #31) > 3) your fontconfig files should look neat as > a)amiri-fontconfig.conf > > > > > sans-serif > > Amiri > > > > Amiri > > sans-serif > > > Amiri is a serif, not a sans-serif font. > b)amiri-quran-fontconfig.conf > > > > > sans-serif > > Amiri Quran > > > > Amiri Quran > > sans-serif > > > Amiri Quran is a special font for typesetting Quran (it has a very high line hight, only support characters used in Quran, some typographic choices not generally suitable for regular text), so I don’t think such an alias is a good idea. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1015701] Review Request: amiri-fonts - Arabic font form amirifont.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015701
--- Comment #31 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
suggestions:
1) your source download link should be
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/amiri/%{fontname}-%{version}.tar.bz2
2) good to always truncate your long lines with 80 characters per line
# Sorts Mill tools (and others) which necessary to rebuild Amiri fonts isn't
# released in Fedora yet. Enable the disabled-lines when rebuilding of Amiri
# fonts possible.
but I will suggest you better clean the spec and let not include comments and
sorts mill tools information.
We have many font packages which are not built from source so not a hard
requirement. Just install binary files for now.
3) your fontconfig files should look neat as
a)amiri-fontconfig.conf
sans-serif
Amiri
Amiri
sans-serif
b)amiri-quran-fontconfig.conf
sans-serif
Amiri Quran
Amiri Quran
sans-serif
4) font package name should be
[foundryname-]projectname[-fontfamilyname]-fonts, in lowercase.
so you should install amiri-boldslanted.ttf, amiri-bold.ttf, amiri-regular.ttf,
amiri-slanted.ttf from main amiri-fonts package
and
amiri-quran.ttf font from amiri-quran-fonts package
5) I don't think we need this font to be default Arabic font in Fedora. I will
suggest to use 67 or 68 fontconfig priority like other fonts are using. Good to
keep 67 priority as we have one example as 67-paktype-naskh-basic.conf
6) you should add -common package and not -doc package. Also, all other
documentation files to -common package.
7) then, this -common be added to amiri-fonts and amiri-quran-fonts as
Requires: amiri-fonts-common
Feel free to ask me if you got any doubts in above.
Provide new srpm that fixes above issues.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518317] Review Request: perdition - Mail Retrieval Proxy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518317 --- Comment #28 from Murray McAllister --- I have not, but I see now at the end of the Debian bug report it says "I've reported it to the upstream mailing list, but for whatever reason the message hasn't cleared that mailing list yet." -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1003089] Review Request: glusterfs-openstack-swift - Gluster for Swift
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003089 --- Comment #19 from Luis Pabon --- Hi all, thank you for the reviews. I have a new 1.10.0-1 version available for F19+: SPEC URL: https://raw.github.com/lpabon/fedora/master/1.10.0/glusterfs-openstack-swift.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/lpabon/fedora/raw/master/1.10.0/glusterfs-openstack-swift-1.10.0-1.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1021485] Review Request: oscap-anaconda-addon - Anaconda addon integrating OpenSCAP to the installation process
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021485 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- oscap-anaconda-addon-0.2-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1016807] Review Request: tubo - Library to thread process std-in/std-err/std-out from fork() child
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016807 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- tubo-5.0.10-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 989069] Review Request: python-uri-templates - A Python implementation of URI Template
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989069 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|python-uri-templates-0.5.2- |python-uri-templates-0.5.2- |1.fc19 |1.fc18 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- python-uri-templates-0.5.2-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 989069] Review Request: python-uri-templates - A Python implementation of URI Template
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989069 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-uri-templates-0.5.2- ||1.fc19 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-11-10 21:33:41 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- python-uri-templates-0.5.2-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 989068] Review Request: google-api-python-client - Google APIs Client Library for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989068 Bug 989068 depends on bug 989069, which changed state. Bug 989069 Summary: Review Request: python-uri-templates - A Python implementation of URI Template https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989069 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1024152] Review Request: rubygem-innertube - A thread-safe resource pool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024152 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|rubygem-innertube-1.1.0-2.f |rubygem-innertube-1.1.0-2.f |c20 |c19 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- rubygem-innertube-1.1.0-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1025058] Review Request: python-flask-images - Dynamic image resizing for Flask
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025058 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- python-flask-images-1.0.0-3.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1015263] Review request: lz4 Extremely fast compression algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015263 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|lz4-r107-1.fc19 |lz4-r107-1.fc18 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System --- lz4-r107-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1008772] Review Request: hidapi - Library for communicating with USB and Bluetooth HID devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008772 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|hidapi-0.7.0-2.a88c724.fc20 |hidapi-0.7.0-2.a88c724.fc19 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- hidapi-0.7.0-2.a88c724.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1015263] Review request: lz4 Extremely fast compression algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015263 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|lz4-r107-1.el6 |lz4-r107-1.fc19 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System --- lz4-r107-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1020096] Review Request: python-blosc - Python wrapper for the blosc high performance compressor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020096 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- python-blosc-1.1-7.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1004563] Review Request: metadata-extractor2 - Extracts EXIF, IPTC and XMP metadata from image files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004563 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- metadata-extractor2-2.6.4-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1024688] Review Request: erlang-cl - OpenCL binding for Erlang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024688 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|erlang-cl-1.2.1-1.fc20 |erlang-cl-1.2.1-1.fc19 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- erlang-cl-1.2.1-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1004563] Review Request: metadata-extractor2 - Extracts EXIF, IPTC and XMP metadata from image files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004563 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- metadata-extractor2-2.6.4-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/metadata-extractor2-2.6.4-2.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1027187] Review Request: rubygem-coercible - Powerful, flexible and configurable coercion library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027187 Ken Dreyer changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Ken Dreyer --- Thank you Mario very much for the review! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: rubygem-coercible Short Description: Powerful, flexible and configurable coercion library Owners: ktdreyer Branches: f19 f20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1027453] Review Request: rubygem-mono_logger - A lock-free logger compatible with Ruby 2.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027453 Ken Dreyer changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Ken Dreyer --- Thank you Mario very much for the review! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: rubygem-mono_logger Short Description: A lock-free logger compatible with Ruby 2.0 Owners: ktdreyer Branches: f19 f20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1028818] Review Request: python-pyplete - Dynamic autocompletion for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028818 T.C. Hollingsworth changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1028819 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028819 [Bug 1028819] missing python-foo requires for pate plugins -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1010741] python-nikola - Static website and blog generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010741 --- Comment #13 from Pete Travis --- Here's the latest, as requested. Complete functionality pending #1028774. Spec URL: http://immanetize.fedorapeople.org/python-nikola.spec SRPM URL: http://immanetize.fedorapeople.org/python-nikola-6.2.1-1.fc21.src.rpm Description:Nikola is a static site and blog generator using Python. It generates sites with tags, feeds, archives, comments, and more from plain text files. Source can be unformatted, or formatted with reStructuredText or Markdown. It also automatically builds image galleries. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1028817] Review Request: python-pysmell - An autocompletion library for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028817 T.C. Hollingsworth changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1028818 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028818 [Bug 1028818] Review Request: python-pyplete - Dynamic autocompletion for Python -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1028818] New: Review Request: python-pyplete - Dynamic autocompletion for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028818 Bug ID: 1028818 Summary: Review Request: python-pyplete - Dynamic autocompletion for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: tchollingswo...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/kate-pate/python-pyplete.spec SRPM: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/kate-pate/python-pyplete-0.0.5-1.fc20.src.rpm Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6163424 FAS: patches Description: PyPlete provides dynamic autocompletion for Python. It uses pysmell but unlike the standard version of it, PyPlete is dynamic, it does not need to execute a command to pre-analyze the code. It is useful for analyzing (or autocompleting) Python code. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1028818] Review Request: python-pyplete - Dynamic autocompletion for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028818 T.C. Hollingsworth changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1028817 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028817 [Bug 1028817] Review Request: python-pysmell - An autocompletion library for Python -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1028817] New: Review Request: python-pysmell - An autocompletion library for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028817 Bug ID: 1028817 Summary: Review Request: python-pysmell - An autocompletion library for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: tchollingswo...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/kate-pate/python-pysmell.spec SRPM: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/kate-pate/python-pysmell-0.7.3-1.fc20.src.rpm Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6163422 Description: PySmell is a python IDE completion helper. It tries to statically analyze Python source code, without executing it, and generates information about a project's structure that IDE tools can use. PySmell currently supports Vim, Emacs and TextMate. It can be integrated with any editor that can run Python scripts and has an auto-complete API. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1000949] Review Request: ttfautohint - Automated hinting utility for TrueType fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000949 --- Comment #2 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- rpmlint ttfautohint: ttfautohint.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bytecode -> byte code, byte-code, decorate ttfautohint.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US glyphs -> glyph, glyph s ttfautohint.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US autohinting -> auto hinting, auto-hinting, autographing ttfautohint.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US autohinter -> auto hinter, auto-hinter, intrauterine Please don't change autohinter to intrauterine :) ttfautohint.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/ttfautohint/FTL.TXT It appears to be latin1, and it's just the © symbol in the Introduction, so not crucial. But it would be nice to fix the file. ttfautohint.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ttfautohint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. % rpmlint ttfautohint-gui ttfautohint-gui.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bytecode -> byte code, byte-code, decorate ttfautohint-gui.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US glyphs -> glyph, glyph s ttfautohint-gui.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US autohinting -> auto hinting, auto-hinting, autographing ttfautohint-gui.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US autohinter -> auto hinter, auto-hinter, intrauterine ttfautohint-gui.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/ttfautohint-gui/FTL.TXT ttfautohint-gui.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ttfautohintGUI - URLs work, sources are OK ! version 0.97 is available - license is OK, files present - gnulib is bundled, which is OK. - package name is sane - Docs are 1.7MB, probably not worth splitting out. ! There's an issue that -gui has an (identical) copy of the docs. Very nice and clean package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1000949] Review Request: ttfautohint - Automated hinting utility for TrueType fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000949 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zbys...@in.waw.pl Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736717] Review Request: lcmaps - Grid (X.509) and VOMS credentials to local account mapping
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736717
--- Comment #33 from Dennis van Dok ---
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #32)
> The libdl dep should be handled like other library dep - a true/false macro
> should be added to the AC_CHECK_LIB() call (see the call for crypto a little
> below) to set a DL_LIBS variable which would only be added to those link
> lines that need it.
The next release will address this issue.
> Although I'm not seeing any more unused lib dep rpmlint
> messages myself on F20, so I'm not sure it is necessary.
Perhaps the --as-needed did the trick after all? I'm running fedora-review on
f19, I'm not sure I should expect the same results.
> FWIW - If you still want to target EPEL5, you'll need BuildRoot and %clean.
> If not, I would drop the conditionals for %{rhel}<=5.
Yes, we do aim for EPEL5. So I'll fix this.
> Finally - are you *sure* you want to keep the -devel packages as noarch?
No, are the -devel packages noarch now? The only thing I see is that they have
a requires on some packages without %{?_isa}; is that harmful?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1019824] Review Request: python-dopy - Python client for the Digital Ocean API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019824 Ralph Bean changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-11-10 17:23:36 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1028809] New: Review Request: libe-book - a library for import of non-HTML reflowable e-book formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028809 Bug ID: 1028809 Summary: Review Request: libe-book - a library for import of non-HTML reflowable e-book formats Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dtar...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://dtardon.fedorapeople.org/rpm/libe-book.spec SRPM URL: http://dtardon.fedorapeople.org/rpm/libe-book-0.0.1-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: libe-book is a library for import of non-HTML reflowable e-book formats. Currently supported are PalmDoc, TealDoc, Plucker eBook, eReader eBook, FictionBook v.2, TCR, zTXT. It will be a dependency of libreoffice 4.2. Fedora Account System Username: dtardon -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1000870] Review Request: nini - An uncommonly powerful .NET configuration library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000870
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
1. Package is noarch, so the -devel should not require %{name}%{?_isa}, just
plain %{name}.
2. %description should be a bit more informative about what the library does,
and should not repeat the blurb "uncommonly powerful" which doesn't really mean
much.
3. The contents of the "Docs" directory could be moved one level up (so there
would be /usr/share/doc/nini/Reference/, /usr/share/doc/nini/Manual).
- License is OK
- package name is OK
- spec is nice and clear
- sources are downloadable and match the srpm
- dist tag is there
- no build root or other obsolete stuff
- license is ok, file present and installed
- latest version
- follows Mono guidelines
- %files is OK
rpmlint nini:
nini.src:37: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/nini
nini.src:39: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/nini/
nini.src:46: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/nini/
It's OK per mono guidelines.
nini.src:41: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
nini.src:41: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
nini.src:41: W: macro-in-comment %{_prefix}
That comment could be removed.
nini.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/nini/Nini/1.1.0/Nini-1.1.0.zip timed
out
Works for me.
% rpmlint nini-devel
nini-devel.noarch: W: no-documentation
nini-devel.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/pkgconfig/nini.pc
${SOURCE1} should be -x.
Nice and clean module issues noted above.
Package is APPROVED.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1028780] Review Request: thunar-sendto-clamtk - Simple virus scanning extension for Thunar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028780 --- Comment #2 from Dave M --- > Clamtk isn't available for EPEL5, only via Repoforge, which we don't support. Thank you - I wasn't planning to push any official ClamTk packages to EPEL yet. As far as EPEL, I'd rather get perl-Gtk3 accepted as an official package (as it is in Fedora), because that's where ClamTk itself is going in the near future. > You can safely drop the following obsolete parts: Thank you - done. > Obviously this is now part of the current Clamtk v5 (released yesterday) Yes, the homepage was misleading. The Thunar and Dolphin functionality are only available via the extra packages (thunar-sendto-clamtk and clamtk-kde, respectively). I rephrased the homepage to clarify. > You are the upstream author, Yes, I'm also a Fedora maintainer for ClamTk as well. I'm going to clean up that spec file as well, with the tips you provided here. > Please use your own project homepage instead: Makes sense - Done. Spec URL: http://davem.fedorapeople.org/thunar-sendto-clamtk.spec SRPM URL: http://davem.fedorapeople.org/thunar-sendto-clamtk-0.04-3.src.rpm Thank you for the feedback; it's much appreciated. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 987132] Review Request: php-ZendFramework2 - Zend Framework 2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987132 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- php-ZendFramework2-2.2.5-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ZendFramework2-2.2.5-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 987132] Review Request: php-ZendFramework2 - Zend Framework 2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987132 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- php-ZendFramework2-2.2.5-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ZendFramework2-2.2.5-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 987132] Review Request: php-ZendFramework2 - Zend Framework 2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987132 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- php-ZendFramework2-2.2.5-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ZendFramework2-2.2.5-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1028780] Review Request: thunar-sendto-clamtk - Simple virus scanning extension for Thunar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028780 Mario Blättermann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co ||m --- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann --- Clamtk isn't available for EPEL5, only via Repoforge, which we don't support. You can safely drop the following obsolete parts: * The BuildRoot definition * Initial cleaning of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in %install * The %clean section * The %defattr line in %files The Googlecode project page tells us about a Thunar context click menu: > The latest version is 5.00. Here's what's new: > Right-click context menu support for Nautilus, Thunar, and Dolphin Obviously this is now part of the current Clamtk v5 (released yesterday). Then your package would become obsolete once this version has arrived the Fedora repos. Moreover, if the Clamtk people speak about such an extension, how behave Thunar and Clamtk without your *.desktop file? You are the upstream author, but you mention the Clamtk homepage as project URL. Please use your own project homepage instead: https://bitbucket.org/dave_theunsub/thunar-sendto-clamtk/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 987132] Review Request: php-ZendFramework2 - Zend Framework 2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987132 Shawn Iwinski changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Shawn Iwinski --- Package Change Request == Package Name: php-ZendFramework2 New Branches: Owners: siwinski remi heffer InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1000870] Review Request: nini - An uncommonly powerful .NET configuration library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000870 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zbys...@in.waw.pl Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1015263] Review request: lz4 Extremely fast compression algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015263 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|lz4-r107-1.el5 |lz4-r107-1.el6 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System --- lz4-r107-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1015263] Review request: lz4 Extremely fast compression algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015263 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|lz4-r107-1.fc20 |lz4-r107-1.el5 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System --- lz4-r107-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1020961] Review Request: jq - Command-line JSON processor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020961 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- jq-1.3-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 947492] Review Request: luakit - Extremely fast, lightweight and flexible vi-like web browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947492 T.C. Hollingsworth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Last Closed||2013-11-10 15:00:10 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1027453] Review Request: rubygem-mono_logger - A lock-free logger compatible with Ruby 2.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027453
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
||m
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
||m
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann ---
$ rpmlint -i -v *
rubygem-mono_logger.noarch: I: checking
rubygem-mono_logger.noarch: I: checking-url
https://github.com/steveklabnik/mono_logger (timeout 10 seconds)
rubygem-mono_logger.src: I: checking
rubygem-mono_logger.src: I: checking-url
https://github.com/steveklabnik/mono_logger (timeout 10 seconds)
rubygem-mono_logger.src: I: checking-url
https://rubygems.org/gems/mono_logger-1.1.0.gem (timeout 10 seconds)
rubygem-mono_logger-doc.noarch: I: checking
rubygem-mono_logger-doc.noarch: I: checking-url
https://github.com/steveklabnik/mono_logger (timeout 10 seconds)
rubygem-mono_logger.spec: I: checking-url
https://rubygems.org/gems/mono_logger-1.1.0.gem (timeout 10 seconds)
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Rpmlint is silent once again.
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
MIT
[+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it
is used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream URL can be
specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to
deal with this.
$ sha256sum *
d7ab7f237935b295e072a99fa84379a3e1bcccd2822fee2ecfacecde07a6d7a3
mono_logger-1.1.0.gem
d7ab7f237935b295e072a99fa84379a3e1bcccd2822fee2ecfacecde07a6d7a3
mono_logger-1.1.0.gem.orig
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line.
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for
any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
[.] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific
situations)
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[+] MUST: Large documentation files must go
[Bug 1027187] Review Request: rubygem-coercible - Powerful, flexible and configurable coercion library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027187
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
||m
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
||m
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann ---
$ rpmlint -i -v *
rubygem-coercible.noarch: I: checking
rubygem-coercible.noarch: I: checking-url https://github.com/solnic/coercible
(timeout 10 seconds)
rubygem-coercible.src: I: checking
rubygem-coercible.src: I: checking-url https://github.com/solnic/coercible
(timeout 10 seconds)
rubygem-coercible.src: I: checking-url
https://rubygems.org/gems/coercible-0.2.0.gem (timeout 10 seconds)
rubygem-coercible-doc.noarch: I: checking
rubygem-coercible-doc.noarch: I: checking-url
https://github.com/solnic/coercible (timeout 10 seconds)
rubygem-coercible.spec: I: checking-url
https://rubygems.org/gems/coercible-0.2.0.gem (timeout 10 seconds)
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Rpmlint is silent.
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
MIT
[+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it
is used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream URL can be
specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to
deal with this.
$ sha256sum *
9a9704c0b0acdaf2a7f17d8d50d69caac4a11aebf6a65a0b888956978fcaa117
coercible-0.2.0.gem
9a9704c0b0acdaf2a7f17d8d50d69caac4a11aebf6a65a0b888956978fcaa117
coercible-0.2.0.gem.orig
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line.
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for
any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
[.] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific
situations)
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[+] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The
definition of large is left up
[Bug 1018523] Review Request: golang-github-coreos-go-log - A golang library for logging to systemd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018523 Bug 1018523 depends on bug 1018501, which changed state. Bug 1018501 Summary: Review Request: golang-bitbucket-kardianos-osext - Extensions to the standard Go OS package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018501 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1018501] Review Request: golang-bitbucket-kardianos-osext - Extensions to the standard Go OS package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018501 Lokesh Mandvekar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed|2013-10-15 16:19:50 |2013-11-10 13:14:22 --- Comment #13 from Lokesh Mandvekar --- i'm closing this since it seems to have made into stable for f20, f19 and el6. please re-open if I got something wrong here. I hope CURRENTRELEASE is the correct flag :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1028780] New: Review Request: thunar-sendto-clamtk - Simple virus scanning extension for Thunar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028780 Bug ID: 1028780 Summary: Review Request: thunar-sendto-clamtk - Simple virus scanning extension for Thunar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dave.n...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://davem.fedorapeople.org/thunar-sendto-clamtk.spec SRPM URL: http://davem.fedorapeople.org/thunar-sendto-clamtk-0.04-2.src.rpm Description: Simple virus scanning extension for XFCE's Thunar Fedora Account System Username: davem Hi, This is a very simple extension to send files or folders from within Thunar to be scanned by ClamTk, a frontend for ClamAV. It's simply a desktop file which gets placed in the correct folder. I'd like to get this package into Fedora. It's been offered for years outside of Fedora repositories, but it would be useful to have it in here. It only needs to be updated every so often with new language strings. Thank you for your inputs. Dave M -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1010741] python-nikola - Static website and blog generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010741 Pete Travis changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1028774 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028774 [Bug 1028774] Please rebuild for python3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 966324] Review Request: codecrypt - The post-quantum cryptography tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966324 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl Whiteboard||NotReady -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 947492] Review Request: luakit - Extremely fast, lightweight and flexible vi-like web browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947492 Lokesh Mandvekar changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(l...@redhat.com) | |needinfo?(l...@redhat.com) | --- Comment #6 from Lokesh Mandvekar --- Hi Christopher, looks like upstream is kinda dormant on this, last commit seems to be about 10 months ago https://github.com/mason-larobina/luakit, also I don't think I'll be using it anymore, so feel free to take this one. Apologies to have left this hanging for so long. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001407] Review Request: herbstluftwm - A manual tiling window manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001407 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl --- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- > herbstluftwm.armv7hl: W: non-conffile-in-etc > /etc/bash_completion.d/herbstclient-completion > The Bash completion file is in the right place, no problem. Actually it's not, at least that's not the preferred place. The file should go into /usr/share/bash-completion/completions. And it should lost "-completion" from the name. What Mario says about owning the directory applies here too: package should own both /usr/share/bash-completion/completions and the /usr/share/bash-completion/completions/herbstclient. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518317] Review Request: perdition - Mail Retrieval Proxy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518317 --- Comment #27 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) --- I think it is should be propagated in upstream. Did you fill such issue? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1020096] Review Request: python-blosc - Python wrapper for the blosc high performance compressor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020096 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- python-blosc-1.1-7.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-blosc-1.1-7.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1020096] Review Request: python-blosc - Python wrapper for the blosc high performance compressor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020096 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1027770] Review Request: ocserv - OpenConnect SSL VPN server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027770 Alec Leamas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|leamas.a...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #13 from Alec Leamas --- Seems reasonable to begin with those, which are simple. However, the argument that "this upstream is not a library, just a repository" is simply not enough to avoid handling the bundled code. So, in the end you will need to get bundling exception(s) or unbundle also the ccan and gnulib files. Perhaps it could be handled as copylibs(?), but you will then still need a formal bundling exception. I suggest you seek some help on the mailing list on how to handle ccan and gnulib. There are knowledgeable people on that list... Sending two separate messages, one about each lib is probably the best. Making the sources available with a link in the message is also good. This will be some work for you. Assigning the review, we need to complete this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1027770] Review Request: ocserv - OpenConnect SSL VPN server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027770 --- Comment #12 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos --- Ok now I understand. The other libraries are: 1. from CCAN, which is a repository of code. There is no library there that could be added to fedora. So I don't think there is something that can be done there. 2. from gnulib, which is also a repository of code with no library. It is used by copying code from their repository to the project's repository. 3. build-aux: These are files installed by the GNU auto-tools. They are not used by ocserv, As far as I understand they are only used for building and the test cases. 4. libopts: It is bundled but in the spec, the fedora's libopts is being used. Now the problematic seems to be: 5. http-parser: Need to link with fedora's http-parser. 6. libpcl: Need to add libpcl to fedora as well. So I'll try to handle the last two, and also remove the code of them (as well as libopts). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1027784] Review Request: gnome-logs - a log viewer for the systemd journal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027784 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1025977] Review Request: captcp - TCP Analyzer for PCAP Files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025977
--- Comment #10 from Michele Baldessari ---
Hi Mikolaj,
(In reply to Mikolaj Izdebski from comment #8)
> I understand that you may prefer "git am", I prefer it too, but that's not
> how patches are applied in Fedora. And there is a reason for that. Packages
> need to follow common practices. If every package had its own way of doing
> everything then it would be hard to understand what they are doing and
> maintain them. In other words, when submitting a package to Fedora
> sometimes you need to sacrifice some of your individual preferences in favor
> of distribution practices.
Makes sense. I've cleaned it up to use the traditional %patch approach.
> chmod calls in %install should be avoided, please use %attr macro in %files
> section instead.
Ack, done. Although without chmod in install I need to be more verbose in the
%files section. (i.e. To avoid a file being listed twice I need to list
files or directories explicitely). Not sure if there is a clever way around
that?
> You are packaging version 1.6, why not use this tarball?
> http://github.com/hgn/%{name}/archive/v%{version}.tar.gz#/%{name}-%{version}.
> tar.gz
> If you use it then you'll be able to get riod of commit and shortcommit
> macros as well as reduce %setup macro call to just "%setup -q".
Ack, I've done so.
> You are mixing some macro styles: %SOURCE2 vs %{_bindir}. Please either use
> %{SOURCE2} and %{_bindir} or %SOURCE2 and %_bindir (the first option if
> preferred).
Ack, I've changed that.
> After having a quick look I think that license tag should be "GPL+" instead
> of "GPLv3" as there is no explicit GPL version specified ("If the Program
> does not specify a version number of the GNU General Public License, you may
> choose any version ever published by the Free Software Foundation.").
>
> There is some bundled MIT-licensed code in documentation. It should either
> be removed or its licensing corrected (which means installing license file
> as documentation and adding "MIT" to license tag).
Let me double-check here with upstream because at least one icon seems in the
public domain as well and while we're at it, I'll ask for clarification about
the whole set of files.
FWIW (while I sort out the license stuff with upstream):
Spec URL: http://acksyn.org/files/rpms/captcp/captcp.spec
SRPM URL: http://acksyn.org/files/rpms/captcp/captcp-1.6-4.fc20.src.rpm
regards,
Michele
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 726989] Review Request: ipwatchd - IP conflict detection tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726989 Jaroslav Imrich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed|2013-01-22 13:15:42 |2013-11-10 06:50:59 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1028743] New: Review Request: hans - IP over ICMP tunneling solution
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028743 Bug ID: 1028743 Summary: Review Request: hans - IP over ICMP tunneling solution Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: pa...@hubbitus.info QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/Hubbitus/Fedora-packaging/d26aadd89b75ebd87c30b6c846378fba24595bf8/SPECS/hans.spec SRPM URL: http://hubbitus.info/rpm/Fedora19/hans/hans-0.4.3-2.fc19.src.rpm Description: Hans makes it possible to tunnel IPv4 through ICMP echo packets, so you could call it a ping tunnel. This can be useful when you find yourself in the situation that your Internet access is firewalled, but pings are allowed. Hans runs on Linux as a client and a server. It runs on Mac OS X, iPhone/iPod touch, FreeBSD and OpenBSD as a client only. Fedora Account System Username: Hubbitus Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6161766 One note also about rpmlint warning only-non-binary-in-usr-lib it already present rpmlint bug: bz#794777. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1028741] Review Request: engauge-digitizer - Convert graphs or map files into numbers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028741 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||Engauge, Digitizer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1028741] New: Review Request: engauge-digitizer - Convert graphs or map files into numbers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028741 Bug ID: 1028741 Summary: Review Request: engauge-digitizer - Convert graphs or map files into numbers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: anto.tra...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/Engauge-Digitizer/engauge-digitizer.spec SRPM URL: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/Engauge-Digitizer/engauge-digitizer-5.2-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: This open source, digitizing software converts an image file showing a graph or map, into numbers. The image file can come from a scanner, digital camera or screen-shot. The numbers can be read on the screen, and written or copied to a spreadsheet. The process starts with an image file containing a graph or map. The final result is digitized data that can be used by other tools such as Gnumeric. Fedora Account System Username: sagitter -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 799701] Review Request: logkeys - Linux keylogger
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799701 --- Comment #10 from Brendan Jones --- Sorry I missed that it had changed back to me. Comment would be good next time. Is this still wanted? Need to change the permissions of the source tarbal and address the missing call to cgroups rpmlint. Source URL is fine logkeys.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) keylogger -> key logger, key-logger, flogger logkeys.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US linux -> Linux logkeys.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US keylogger -> key logger, key-logger, flogger logkeys.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US keyloggers -> key loggers, key-loggers, loggers logkeys.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups /usr/bin/logkeys logkeys.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llk logkeys.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary llkk logkeys.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) keylogger -> key logger, key-logger, flogger logkeys.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US linux -> Linux logkeys.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US keylogger -> key logger, key-logger, flogger logkeys.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US keyloggers -> key loggers, key-loggers, loggers logkeys.src: W: strange-permission logkeys-0.1.1a.tar.gz 0640L logkeys.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://logkeys.googlecode.com/files/logkeys-0.1.1a.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 12 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 799701] Review Request: logkeys - Linux keylogger
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799701 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cicku...@gmail.com --- Comment #9 from Christopher Meng --- (In reply to Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) from comment #8) > (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #7) > > I'll take this(but later review coming) > > Uhm, > > Christopher, can I request you to please communicate with the folks in the > bug before you take over or give up the review? For instance, here there's > no comment asking Brendan if he wanted to give up the bug so you can take > over, and there isn't one asking if he wants to take it over now when you're > giving it up. :/ > > Thanks, > Ankur I think I've reseted the flag to him in July. I just removed myself from this bug as I can't see any new progress here. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 799701] Review Request: logkeys - Linux keylogger
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799701 --- Comment #8 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #7) > I'll take this(but later review coming) Uhm, Christopher, can I request you to please communicate with the folks in the bug before you take over or give up the review? For instance, here there's no comment asking Brendan if he wanted to give up the bug so you can take over, and there isn't one asking if he wants to take it over now when you're giving it up. :/ Thanks, Ankur -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1027770] Review Request: ocserv - OpenConnect SSL VPN server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027770 --- Comment #11 from Alec Leamas --- Now, I don't think we understand each other. I have run the fedora-review tool, which basically runs the licensecheck tool but presents the results in a slightly different way. These tools check all source files (after possible patching in %prep), and the result is in the attachment. Bottom line is that here is a lot of licenses.However, it should not be that hard to sort out since they are all compatible. The bundling issues will probably require more work. After a closer look I find at least the following bundled libraries: - build-assert, check_type, container_of, hash, htable and list from http://ccodearchive.net/ (ccan dir). - http_parser from the existing http-parser package - pcl from https://github.com/knz/pcl. - The build-aux files from lib.idn.h - Several files form autogen-libopts (.../libopts/...). Other packages have a bundling exception for these, so it should not be a problem to apply for one for those. Before that, we need to check on the mailing list, there might be some kind of overall decision for these libs, don't know. - The gl directory might also be something bundled, but I havn't looked more into this. According to the links in comment #8, these must be unbundled. If there is an existing fedora package, it should be used. If not, you should package these dependencies as separate packages. patch the build system to use them and remove them in %prep i. e., unbundle it. In some case you might need to apply for bundling exception, but normally this is the last resort if nothing else works. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 947492] Review Request: luakit - Extremely fast, lightweight and flexible vi-like web browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947492 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added CC|package-review@lists.fedora | |project.org | --- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng --- ping! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1004563] Review Request: metadata-extractor2 - Extracts EXIF, IPTC and XMP metadata from image files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004563 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1004563] Review Request: metadata-extractor2 - Extracts EXIF, IPTC and XMP metadata from image files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004563 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- metadata-extractor2-2.6.4-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/metadata-extractor2-2.6.4-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 989069] Review Request: python-uri-templates - A Python implementation of URI Template
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989069 --- Comment #10 from Christopher Meng --- I think that I wanted to notify you to push them to stable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1000970] Review Request: samsung-tools - Tools for Samsung laptops
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000970 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed|2013-11-10 02:20:04 |2013-11-10 03:39:51 --- Comment #9 from Christopher Meng --- Sorry, I decide to close this review request as this package can't be used in Fedora as missing dependency of vbetool, and seems that from f13 vbetool is useless and as a result it's deprecated now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1019341] Review Request: python-raven - python client for Sentry
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019341 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-raven-3.5.0-2.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-11-10 03:16:06 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- python-raven-3.5.0-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1002707] Review Request: vorbis-java - Ogg and Vorbis toolkit for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002707 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||vorbis-java-0.2-1.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-11-10 03:14:44 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- vorbis-java-0.2-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 990725] Review Request: openstack-neutron - Rename of openstack-quantum package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990725 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||openstack-neutron-2013.2-1. ||fc20 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- openstack-neutron-2013.2-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996222] Review Request: ProDy - Application for protein structure, dynamics and sequence analysis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996222 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ProDy-1.4.6-2.fc19 |ProDy-1.4.6-2.fc20 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- ProDy-1.4.6-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1015263] Review request: lz4 Extremely fast compression algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015263 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|lz4-r106-3.fc20 |lz4-r107-1.fc20 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System --- lz4-r107-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 983340] Review Request: fcitx-kkc - Japanese Kana Kanji Engine for Fcitx
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=983340 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||fcitx-kkc-0.1.0-3.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-11-10 03:11:41 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- fcitx-kkc-0.1.0-3.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1014601] Review Request: python-cssmin - A Python port of the YUI CSS compression algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014601 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|python-cssmin-0.1.4-5.el6 |python-cssmin-0.1.4-6.fc20 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System --- python-cssmin-0.1.4-6.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975317] Review Request: libodb-pgsql - PostgreSQL ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975317 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|libodb-pgsql-2.2.0-1.fc18 |libodb-qt-2.2.1-1.fc20 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- libodb-qt-2.2.1-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1021091] Review Request: dnsyo - Check DNS against many global DNS servers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021091 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|dnsyo-1.1.3-2.fc19 |dnsyo-1.0.2-5.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed|2013-10-30 22:59:39 |2013-11-10 03:04:22 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- dnsyo-1.0.2-5.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1020088] Review Request: blosc - A high performance compressor optimized for binary data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020088 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|blosc-1.2.3-9.fc19 |blosc-1.2.3-9.fc20 --- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System --- blosc-1.2.3-9.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001728] Review Request: rubygem-rkerberos - A Ruby interface for the the Kerberos library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001728 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|rubygem-rkerberos-0.1.3-2.f |rubygem-rkerberos-0.1.3-2.f |c19 |c20 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- rubygem-rkerberos-0.1.3-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1002704] Review Request: boilerpipe - Boilerplate Removal and Fulltext Extraction from HTML pages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002704 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|boilerpipe-1.2.0-1.fc19 |boilerpipe-1.2.0-1.fc20 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- boilerpipe-1.2.0-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1025928] Review Request: rubygem-ice_nine - Deep Freeze Ruby Objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025928 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||rubygem-ice_nine-0.10.0-2.f ||c20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-11-10 02:59:51 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- rubygem-ice_nine-0.10.0-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 989416] Review Request: ghc-pipes - Compositional pipelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989416 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ghc-pipes-4.0.0-2.fc19 |ghc-pipes-4.0.0-2.fc20 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-pipes-4.0.0-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1004337] Review Request: python3-docs - Documentation for the Python 3 programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004337 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||python3-docs-3.3.2-2.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-11-10 02:58:23 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- python3-docs-3.3.2-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1025930] Review Request: rubygem-equalizer - Module to define equality, equivalence and inspection methods
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025930 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||rubygem-equalizer-0.0.7-2.f ||c20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-11-10 02:58:00 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- rubygem-equalizer-0.0.7-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1014619] Review Request: enlightenment - Enlightenment window manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014619 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|enlightenment-0.17.4-3.fc19 |enlightenment-0.17.4-4.fc20 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System --- enlightenment-0.17.4-4.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 891284] Review Request: terminology - EFL based terminal emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891284 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|terminology-0.3.0-3.fc19|terminology-0.3.0-3.fc20 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System --- terminology-0.3.0-3.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1007247] Review Request: php-phpunit-phpcov - TextUI frontend for PHP_CodeCoverage
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1007247 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|php-phpunit-phpcov-1.1.0-1. |php-phpunit-phpcov-1.1.0-1. |el6 |fc20 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- php-phpunit-phpcov-1.1.0-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1003009] Review Request: gnome-colors-icon-theme - GNOME-Colors icon theme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003009 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|gnome-colors-icon-theme-5.5 |gnome-colors-icon-theme-5.5 |.1-6.fc19 |.1-6.fc20 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- gnome-colors-icon-theme-5.5.1-6.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1004231] Review Request: lv2-sorcer - a wave-table synthesizer plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004231 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||lv2-sorcer-1.1-1.1.20131104 ||git18e6891.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-11-10 02:52:40 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- lv2-sorcer-1.1-1.1.20131104git18e6891.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1018523] Review Request: golang-github-coreos-go-log - A golang library for logging to systemd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018523 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|golang-github-coreos-go-log |golang-github-coreos-go-log |-0-0.5.git840af6b.el6 |-0-0.5.git840af6b.fc20 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-coreos-go-log-0-0.5.git840af6b.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1024913] Review Request: perl-Types-Serialiser - Simple data types for common serialization formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024913 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Types-Serialiser-0.03-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1017767] Review Request: google-crosextra-carlito-fonts - Sans-serif font metric-compatible with Calibri font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017767 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|google-crosextra-carlito-fo |google-crosextra-carlito-fo |nts-1.103-0.1.20130920.fc19 |nts-1.103-0.1.20130920.fc20 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- google-crosextra-carlito-fonts-1.103-0.1.20130920.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001300] Review Request: golang-github-gorilla-context - A golang registry for global request variables
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001300 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|golang-github-gorilla-conte |golang-github-gorilla-conte |xt-0-0.19.git708054d.el6|xt-0-0.19.git708054d.fc20 --- Comment #59 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-gorilla-context-0-0.19.git708054d.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 972323] Review Request: hazelcast - Hazelcast CE In-Memory DataGrid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972323 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|hazelcast-2.6.3-1.fc19 |hazelcast-2.6.3-1.fc20 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- hazelcast-2.6.3-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
