[Bug 884497] Review request: perl-Math-BigInt - Arbitrary size integer/float math package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884497 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- The CPAN package is older (0.997) than modules in the latest stable perl: $ corelist -v 5.18.1 |grep Math::BigInt Math::BigInt 1.9991 Math::BigInt::Calc 1.997 Math::BigInt::CalcEmu1.998 Math::BigInt::FastCalc 0.30 Math::BigInt::Trace 0.32 I guess there is no point in creating standalone package. Though we could sub-package it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1035661] Review Request: luajit - Just-In-Time Compiler for Lua
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035661
--- Comment #12 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6246247
Hmm..
.pc on x86_64 RPM attached:
-
# Package information for LuaJIT to be used by pkg-config.
majver=2
minver=0
relver=2
version=${majver}.${minver}.${relver}
abiver=5.1
prefix=/usr
exec_prefix=${prefix}
libdir=${exec_prefix}/lib
libname=luajit-${abiver}
includedir=${prefix}/include/luajit-${majver}.${minver}
INSTALL_LMOD=${prefix}/share/lua/${abiver}
INSTALL_CMOD=/usr/lib64/lua/${abiver}
Name: LuaJIT
Description: Just-in-time compiler for Lua
URL: http://luajit.org
Version: ${version}
Requires:
Libs: -L${libdir} -l${libname}
Libs.private: -Wl,-E -lm -ldl
Cflags: -I${includedir}
-
So I can't approve it now. Problem found!
libdir=${exec_prefix}/lib should be libdir=${exec_prefix}/lib64 on x86_64.
But, you can look at VCS repo of luajit, it now has supported lib64 by
$(MULTILIB) define.
http://repo.or.cz/w/luajit-2.0.git/blob/HEAD:/Makefile
http://repo.or.cz/w/luajit-2.0.git/blob/HEAD:/etc/luajit.pc
Please package 2.1(You should obey the snapshot package guideline), or add
patch to fix that.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1035803] Review Request: jetty-schemas - XML Schemas for Jetty
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035803
--- Comment #1 from Michal Srb m...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
Apache (v2.0), Unknown or generated. 89 files have unknown license.
Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/msrb/review/1035803-jetty-
schemas/licensecheck.txt
license text for ASL 2.0 and EPL 1.0 is present in tarball:
jetty-distribution-remote-resources/src/main/resources/license-eplv10-aslv20.html
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must
be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Java:
[x]: Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
Maven:
[x]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even
when building with ant
[x]: Pom files have correct Maven mapping
[x]: Maven packages should use new style packaging
[x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used
[x]: Packages DOES NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-
utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
[x]: Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x]: Packages use %{_mavenpomdir} instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve
[Bug 1028168] Review Request: rubygem-expression_parser - A math parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028168 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||rubygem-expression_parser-0 ||.9.0-4.fc19 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-12-02 04:33:48 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- rubygem-expression_parser-0.9.0-4.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1031603] Review Request: tuladha-jejeg-fonts - Unicode font for Javanese script
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031603 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||tuladha-jejeg-fonts-2.01-1. ||fc19 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-12-02 04:33:34 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- tuladha-jejeg-fonts-2.01-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1027521] Review Request: rubygem-creole - Lightweight markup language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027521 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||rubygem-creole-0.5.0-3.fc19 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-12-02 04:34:55 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- rubygem-creole-0.5.0-3.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1035661] Review Request: luajit - Just-In-Time Compiler for Lua
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035661
--- Comment #13 from Igor Gnatenko i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com ---
Have you watched .spec ?
# fix .pc (besser82)
sed -i -e 's!${prefix}/lib!%{_libdir}!g' etc/luajit.pc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1027407] Review Request: rubygem-thinking-sphinx - A smart wrapper over Sphinx for ActiveRecord
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027407 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||rubygem-thinking-sphinx-3.0 ||.6-2.fc19 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-12-02 04:35:28 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- rubygem-thinking-sphinx-3.0.6-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1032670] Review Request: docker-registry - Registry server for Docker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032670 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- docker-registry-0.6.0-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/docker-registry-0.6.0-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1032670] Review Request: docker-registry - Registry server for Docker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032670 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- docker-registry-0.6.0-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/docker-registry-0.6.0-2.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1032670] Review Request: docker-registry - Registry server for Docker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032670 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1031587] Review Request: tharlon-fonts - The Myanmar font which is designed by Ngwe Tun
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031587 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||tharlon-fonts-1.002-2.fc19 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-12-02 04:38:13 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- tharlon-fonts-1.002-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1035661] Review Request: luajit - Just-In-Time Compiler for Lua
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035661
--- Comment #14 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Yes, I watched it. But the pasted content were got from the koji build 6246247
for x86_64 -devel package.
Your sed command changed this on lib64 system from:
INSTALL_CMOD=${prefix}/lib/lua/${abiver}
to
INSTALL_CMOD=/usr/lib64/lua/${abiver}
But I still see:
libdir=${exec_prefix}/lib
Don't you think it should be libdir=${exec_prefix}/lib64?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1035661] Review Request: luajit - Just-In-Time Compiler for Lua
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035661 --- Comment #15 from Igor Gnatenko i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com --- ah. sorry. I was frozen... Fixed. New SPEC: http://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/luajit.spec New SRPM: http://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/luajit-2.0.2-6.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1035803] Review Request: jetty-schemas - XML Schemas for Jetty
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035803 --- Comment #2 from Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com --- Changed License to CDDL or GPLv2 with exceptions http://msimacek.fedorapeople.org/jetty-schemas.spec http://msimacek.fedorapeople.org/jetty-schemas-3.1-2.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1036325] Review Request: valabind - Transform vala or vapi files into swig, C++, NodeJS-ffi, or GIR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036325
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
Unknown or generated. 21 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck:
Unknown or generated
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/root/builddir/build/BUILD/valabind-0.7.4/ctypeswriter.vala
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/root/builddir/build/BUILD/valabind-0.7.4/cxxwriter.vala
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/root/builddir/build/BUILD/valabind-0.7.4/dlangwriter.vala
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/root/builddir/build/BUILD/valabind-0.7.4/girwriter.vala
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/root/builddir/build/BUILD/valabind-0.7.4/main.vala
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/root/builddir/build/BUILD/valabind-0.7.4/nodeffiwriter.vala
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/root/builddir/build/BUILD/valabind-0.7.4/swigwriter.vala
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/root/builddir/build/BUILD/valabind-0.7.4/t/java/AsmExample.java
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/root/builddir/build/BUILD/valabind-0.7.4/t/java/RAsm.java
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/root/builddir/build/BUILD/valabind-0.7.4/t/java/RAsmCode.java
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/root/builddir/build/BUILD/valabind-0.7.4/t/python/example.py
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/root/builddir/build/BUILD/valabind-0.7.4/t/r2/test.cs
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/root/builddir/build/BUILD/valabind-0.7.4/t/r2/test.java
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/root/builddir/build/BUILD/valabind-0.7.4/t/r2/test.pl
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/root/builddir/build/BUILD/valabind-0.7.4/t/r2/test.py
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/root/builddir/build/BUILD/valabind-0.7.4/t/r2/test.rb
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/root/builddir/build/BUILD/valabind-0.7.4/t/vala/test.cxx
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/root/builddir/build/BUILD/valabind-0.7.4/t/vala/test.py
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/root/builddir/build/BUILD/valabind-0.7.4/t/vala/vstest.vala
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/root/builddir/build/BUILD/valabind-0.7.4/utils.vala
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/root/builddir/build/BUILD/valabind-0.7.4/valabindwriter.vala
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 51200 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
[Bug 1010741] Review Request: python-nikola - Static website and blog generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010741 --- Comment #26 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- Apparently not fixed yet after running fedora-review again: RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/share/man/man1/nikola.1.gz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1035661] Review Request: luajit - Just-In-Time Compiler for Lua
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035661
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #16 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
PACKAGE APPROVED
---
sed -i -e 's!${prefix}/lib!%{_libdir}!g' etc/luajit.pc
sed -i -e 's!${exec_prefix}/lib!%{_libdir}!g' etc/luajit.pc
Can just be:
sed -i -e 's!${.*prefix}/lib!%{_libdir}!g' etc/luajit.pc
;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1036311] Review Request: glite-lbjp-common-gsoap-plugin - Plugin for gSoap to use glite-security-gss as the communication layer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036311 --- Comment #2 from František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz --- Yes, it is well tested. This change is there since January 2012 and used in EGI, http://www.egi.eu/. In this case, the dependency is globus-gssapi-gsi-devel, and the dependency is provided transitively by glite-lbjp-common-gss-devel package. Usually I would keep the rule for each beast what it needs (and gsoap-plugin needs GSS API), but I think it is better to get it only transitively, because the glite-lbjp-common-gss-devel package providing security can have different dependency based on the build options (globus providing proxy certificate, or krb5 providing Kerberos mechanism). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1035803] Review Request: jetty-schemas - XML Schemas for Jetty
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035803 Michal Srb m...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Michal Srb m...@redhat.com --- The packages looks good now. Approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1035803] Review Request: jetty-schemas - XML Schemas for Jetty
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035803 --- Comment #4 from Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: jetty-schemas Short Description: XML schemas for Jetty Owners: msimacek Branches: f20 InitialCC: java-sig msrb sochotni mizdebsk -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1035803] Review Request: jetty-schemas - XML Schemas for Jetty
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035803 Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1032108] Review Request: yarock - A Lightweight and Beautiful Music Player
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032108
--- Comment #45 from James Abtahi jamescateg...@gmail.com ---
In any case, the directory containing the translations needs to be listed in
%files with a %dir tag, e.g.:
%dir %{_datadir}/locale/%{name}/
Thanks a lot for this solution. Saved me from a lot of headaches. I've added it
to the new spec.
2. Whats the status of upstreaming the patches? It's usually good
practice to add comments next to any patches in the spec with links
to any upstream bug reports, or even just a 'sent to upstream on -mm-dd'
Done. I sent the patches to upstream and added comments to the spec file. I
also fixed that little coverart typo in description.
updated SPEC:
http://jam3s.fedorapeople.org/yarock.spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 987738] Review Request: dput - Debian package upload tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
--- Comment #7 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to František Dvořák from comment #6)
My observations:
1) description could be improved
Inspiration can be found in upstream:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/dput.git;a=blob;f=debian/
control;hb=HEAD .
Thanks, anonscm sometimes can't be accessed. I will change the description
later.
4) missing build requires python2-devel or python3-devel
Here it is not so clear, what to do with it.
There are *.py and *.pyc files in /usr/share/dput/, and this directory
doesn't distinguish the python version. Proper directory could be
%{python_sitelib} or %{python3_sitelib}, but these files are used as
plugins and the code expects them in /usr/share/dput. Am I right these
files should remain there? (I'm not python programmer.)
I that case it could be just used python-devel as the build dependency (=
using default python BR).
Well, I don't think this is a problem. This is not a python module, can't be
used in system-wide, so we don't need to store it under python_sitelib, see my
another package git-cola.
Do you want to review it? ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1034347] Review Request: libvirt-python - python binding for libvirt library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034347 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Berrange berra...@redhat.com --- Spec URL: http://berrange.fedorapeople.org/review/libvirt-python/libvirt-python.spec SRPM URL: http://berrange.fedorapeople.org/review/libvirt-python/libvirt-python-1.2.0-1.fc19.src.rpm The bogus provides should be gone in this SRPM - the previous SRPM was built with the wrong spec file which lacked the %filter rules. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1036297] Review Request: libturpial - library needed to new turpial (twitter client) version
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036297 --- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net --- rename the package to turpial-libturpial or python-libturpial python-libturpial is the right choice -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 987738] Review Request: dput - Debian package upload tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738 --- Comment #8 from František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz --- Yes, I can review it. :-) Do you plan to push it to EPEL? I can imagine dput could be useful also there (RHEL or RHEL-based server working with Debian packages...). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033037] Review Request: undbx - Outlook Express .dbx files extractor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033037 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zbys...@in.waw.pl Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033037] Review Request: undbx - Outlook Express .dbx files extractor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033037 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl --- 1. License seems to be GPLv3+ not GPLv3 2. /usr/bin/undbx.hta should be removed (or moved, is it useful for anything under Linux)? fedora-review is all happy, I'll not paste the output here. rpmlint output is only spelling false-positives. Package is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1028818] Review Request: python-pyplete - Dynamic autocompletion for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028818 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu Alias||python-pyplete -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1028817] Review Request: python-pysmell - An autocompletion library for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028817 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu --- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- ping? Did this ever get imported? (doing so would likely help facilitate the dependant python-pyplete package review) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005522] Review Request: ghc-mtl - Monad classes using functional dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005522 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005522] Review Request: ghc-mtl - Monad classes using functional dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005522 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1019215] Review Request: ghc-network-enumerator - Enumerators for network sockets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019215 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1019215] Review Request: ghc-network-enumerator - Enumerators for network sockets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019215 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1023706] Review Request: ghc-zlib - Compression and decompression in the gzip and zlib formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023706 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1023706] Review Request: ghc-zlib - Compression and decompression in the gzip and zlib formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023706 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1031569] Review Request: cdac-sakal-marathi-fonts - Marathi language font from CDAC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031569 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1031569] Review Request: cdac-sakal-marathi-fonts - Marathi language font from CDAC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031569 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1035803] Review Request: jetty-schemas - XML Schemas for Jetty
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035803 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1035803] Review Request: jetty-schemas - XML Schemas for Jetty
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035803 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1035661] Review Request: luajit - Just-In-Time Compiler for Lua
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035661 Igor Gnatenko i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Igor Gnatenko i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com --- Christopher, thank you for review ! ;) New Package SCM Request === Package Name: luajit Short Description: Just-In-Time Compiler for Lua Owners: ignatenkobrain Branches: f19 f20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005800] Review Request: jsonic - Simple JSON encoder/decoder for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005800 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zbys...@in.waw.pl --- Comment #1 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl --- I'll review this, but do we actually need this? There's already android-json-org-java google-gson json-lib json_simple jsonp jackson ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1014738] Review Request: python-astropy - A Community Python Library for Astronomy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014738 --- Comment #22 from Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com --- As there are no comments from the reviewer in the last month, I'm starting the stalled review process https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1035661] Review Request: luajit - Just-In-Time Compiler for Lua
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035661 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1035661] Review Request: luajit - Just-In-Time Compiler for Lua
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035661 --- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1008063] Review Request: the_silver_searcher - A code-searching tool similar to ack, but faster
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008063 --- Comment #22 from Dridi Boukelmoune dridi.boukelmo...@gmail.com --- The /usr/bin/ag file in python-ase is now known as /usr/bin/ase-gui thanks to bug 1010479, and the update is available on rawhide. We can resume this review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1036754] New: Review Request: ttembed - Remove embedding limitations from TrueType fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036754 Bug ID: 1036754 Summary: Review Request: ttembed - Remove embedding limitations from TrueType fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: pvobo...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://pvoborni.fedorapeople.org/ttembed/ttembed.spec SRPM URL: http://pvoborni.fedorapeople.org/ttembed/ttembed-1.1-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: Remove embedding limitations from TrueType fonts, by setting the fsType field in the OS/2 table to zero. That's it; this program is a one-trick pony. Fedora Account System Username: pvoborni I'm not in packager group, therefore I need a sponsor. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6247180 This tool should help with packaging fonts which doesn't have fsType(embeddable permission) set to zero(installable) - needed when serving font to Internet Explorer 9+. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1036754] Review Request: ttembed - Remove embedding limitations from TrueType fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036754 Petr Vobornik pvobo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1036755] New: Review Request: python-httpretty - HTTP client mock for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036755 Bug ID: 1036755 Summary: Review Request: python-httpretty - HTTP client mock for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mhron...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/hroncok/SPECS/master/python-httpretty.spec SRPM URL: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/7353/6247353/python-httpretty-0.6.5-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: HTTPretty is a HTTP client mock library for Python 100% inspired on ruby's FakeWeb. If you come from ruby this would probably sound familiar :) Fedora Account System Username: churchyard Note: This is not the latest upstream release, the reasons are described here: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2013-December/009842.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033037] Review Request: undbx - Outlook Express .dbx files extractor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033037 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- Thank you. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: undbx Short Description: Outlook Express .dbx files extractor Owners: cicku Branches: f19 f20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033037] Review Request: undbx - Outlook Express .dbx files extractor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033037 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033037] Review Request: undbx - Outlook Express .dbx files extractor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033037 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1034492] Review Request: asciinema - Record and upload terminal sessions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034492 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jedelsky jakub.jedel...@gmail.com --- Marcin: you're welcome. It's my first package, so I hope everything will be ok :) Well, so I made a little changes against first version of SPEC file, there are results: SPEC: https://gist.github.com/jakubjedelsky/7654715 rpmlints: # there are warnings becouse of Summary (I used asciinema.org there) and missing man page $ rpmlint asciinema.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint asciinema-0.9.7-2.fc19.src.rpm asciinema.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C asciinema 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint asciinema-0.9.7-2.fc19.noarch.rpm asciinema.noarch: W: name-repeated-in-summary C asciinema asciinema.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary asciinema 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. and build (with srpm): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6247406 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1036755] Review Request: python-httpretty - HTTP client mock for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036755 Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1024363 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024363 [Bug 1024363] python-boto: Provide Python 3 subpackage -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1026380] Review Request: corebird - Native GTK Twitter client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026380 --- Comment #14 from Ryan Lerch rle...@redhat.com --- Thanks ankur! the updated files are available here: http://ryanlerch.org/corebird/package/ cheers, ryanlerch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1036254] Review Request: hamster-time-tracker - The Linux time tracker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036254 Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com --- Perfect. ;) Package approved ! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1035897] Review Request: open-sans-fonts - a humanist sans-serif typeface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035897 Petr Vobornik pvobo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1036754 --- Comment #1 from Petr Vobornik pvobo...@redhat.com --- I've replaced the usage of custom font forge script which sets the embeddable to installable by ttembed tool. ttembed is cleaner solution since it doesn't regenerate the whole font file and can be also used by other font packages. Spec and SRPM were updated. ttembed package is currently under review: bug 1036754 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036754 [Bug 1036754] Review Request: ttembed - Remove embedding limitations from TrueType fonts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1036754] Review Request: ttembed - Remove embedding limitations from TrueType fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036754 Petr Vobornik pvobo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1035897 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035897 [Bug 1035897] Review Request: open-sans-fonts - a humanist sans-serif typeface -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1017994] Review Request: rubygem-climate_control - Modify your ENV easily
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017994 --- Comment #3 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com --- Hi Björn, just a friendly ping to see if you're still able to review this package? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1000662] Review Request: docker-io - Automates deployment of containerized applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000662 --- Comment #64 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- docker-io-0.7.0-14.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/docker-io-0.7.0-14.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1000662] Review Request: docker-io - Automates deployment of containerized applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000662 --- Comment #65 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- docker-io-0.7.0-14.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/docker-io-0.7.0-14.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033961] Review Request: powerline - The ultimate statusline/prompt utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033961 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033961] Review Request: powerline - The ultimate statusline/prompt utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033961 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- powerline-0.0.1-6.20131123gitdb80fc.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/powerline-0.0.1-6.20131123gitdb80fc.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1000662] Review Request: docker-io - Automates deployment of containerized applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000662 --- Comment #66 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- docker-io-0.7.0-14.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/docker-io-0.7.0-14.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033961] Review Request: powerline - The ultimate statusline/prompt utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033961 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- powerline-0.0.1-6.20131123gitdb80fc.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/powerline-0.0.1-6.20131123gitdb80fc.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1026376] Review Request: fontawesome-fonts - Iconic font set
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026376 --- Comment #9 from Petr Vobornik pvobo...@redhat.com --- Hi, thank you for packaging this font. We would like to use it as well in FreeIPA. There is an issue though. Current otf and ttf versions of this font contains a bug: embeddable permissions are set to printable(fstype=0004) instead of installable(fstype=). This causes a bug when the font is served to Internet Explorer 9+: CSS3114: @font-face failed OpenType embedding permission check. Permission must be Installable. fontawesome-webfont.ttf Can you please set the flag to 0 during rpm build until upstream fixes it? There is a discussion on fedora devel about it: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-November/192518.html I'm packaging Open Sans fonts - bug 1035897 where it's fixed by ttembed tool which is being packages as well - bug 1036754. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1000662] Review Request: docker-io - Automates deployment of containerized applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000662 Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #67 from Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com --- Package Change Request == Package Name: docker-io Branches: f18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1032205] Review Request: jamon-runtime - Jamon runtime support classes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032205 Robert Rati rr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Robert Rati rr...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: jamon-runtime Short Description: Jamon runtime support classes Owners: rrati Branches: InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1032202] Review Request: jamon-nodegen-plugin - Jamon Nodegen Maven Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032202 Robert Rati rr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Robert Rati rr...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: jamon-nodegen-plugin Short Description: Jamon Nodegen Maven Owners: rrati Branches: InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1032204] Review Request: jamon-processor - Jamon Template Processor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032204 Robert Rati rr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Robert Rati rr...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: jamon-processor Short Description: Jamon Template Processor Owners: rrati Branches: InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1032200] Review Request: jamon-maven-plugin - Jamon Maven plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032200 Robert Rati rr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Robert Rati rr...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: jamon-maven-plugin Short Description: Jamon Maven plugin Owners: rrati Branches: InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1032108] Review Request: yarock - A Lightweight and Beautiful Music Player
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032108 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #46 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com --- Great. Thanks for the pointer on the locale dir Kevin Koffler. Usually when adding comments for patches, thats done at the top where the patch is defined instead of in the prep where it's applied. You might move those comments up to the top, you can do that before you import it... I don't see any further blockers, so this package is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1000662] Review Request: docker-io - Automates deployment of containerized applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000662 Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #68 from Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com --- (In reply to Lokesh Mandvekar from comment #67) Package Change Request == Package Name: docker-io Branches: f18 aah sorry ..disregard this ... i was able to set it myself -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1036319] Review Request: libnftables - Library for low-level interaction with nftables Netlink's API over libmnl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036319 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com --- Thanks for the review! (In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #1) * Both configure.ac and libnftables.pc contain version 1.0.0 already, symbol versioning uses 1.0. If you're afraid of making this a 1.0.0 pre-release, use Version 0, not 0.0. The extra .0 doesn't serve any purpose at all. Fair enough. Changing to 0. * Reproducing the git checkout resulted in a 2KB diff, updates to file xt_LOG.h and nft-expr_target-test.c Will look. Possibly commits that happened after my checkout. * Build output is non-verbose. One cannot examine compiler flags'n'friends that way. Add option --disable-silent-rules to the %configure call. That works with the regenerated Autotools files. Will add. * Relevant rpmlint output: libnftables.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.0-0.1 ['0.0-0.1.2013113 0git.fc20', '0.0-0.1.20131130git'] libnftables.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/libnftables/COPYING https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#incorrect-fsf-address Will ask upstream to fix. * Directory tests contains stuff compiled by Make target check and run by tests/test-script.sh. It could be worthwhile building that stuff in the %check section. Here everything builds, and all test programs print OK. Will add. %packagedevel Group: Development/Libraries Either drop the Group tag here, or add one also to the base package (System Environment/Libraries there). Poor copy and paste on my part, removing. %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag Would be nice if rpmdev-newspec didn't add this (as thats what I used here). Removed. * No real blockers during review. I highly recommend changing version to 0 and enabling verbose build, at least. That could be done when importing into dist git, however. So: APPROVED Thanks. Will do above cleanups. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1036319] Review Request: libnftables - Library for low-level interaction with nftables Netlink's API over libmnl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036319 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: libnftables Short Description: Library for low-level interaction with nftables Netlink's API over libmnl Owners: kevin Branches: devel InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1034347] Review Request: libvirt-python - python binding for libvirt library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034347 Cole Robinson crobi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Cole Robinson crobi...@redhat.com --- Looks good. Please remember to add virt-ma...@lists.fedoraproject.org to the CC list -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1034347] Review Request: libvirt-python - python binding for libvirt library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034347 Daniel Berrange berra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Daniel Berrange berra...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: libvirt-python Short Description: The libvirt virtualization API python binding Owners: berrange crobinso veillard Branches: InitialCC: virt-ma...@lists.fedoraproject.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1036836] New: Review Request: rubygem-inflecto - Inflector for strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036836 Bug ID: 1036836 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-inflecto - Inflector for strings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ktdre...@ktdreyer.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-inflecto.spec SRPM URL: http://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-inflecto-0.0.2-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: Inflector for strings Fedora Account System Username: ktdreyer F21 scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6248172 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1029227] Review Request: cvc4 - Automatic theorem prover for SMT problems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029227
José Matos jama...@fc.up.pt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jama...@fc.up.pt
--- Comment #2 from José Matos jama...@fc.up.pt ---
Why do not you place the patch call inside a conditional block:
%if 0%{?fedora} = 20
%patch1
%endif
this procedure is described here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:DistTag
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1032200] Review Request: jamon-maven-plugin - Jamon Maven plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032200 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1032200] Review Request: jamon-maven-plugin - Jamon Maven plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032200 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1032202] Review Request: jamon-nodegen-plugin - Jamon Nodegen Maven Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032202 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1032202] Review Request: jamon-nodegen-plugin - Jamon Nodegen Maven Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032202 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1032204] Review Request: jamon-processor - Jamon Template Processor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032204 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1032204] Review Request: jamon-processor - Jamon Template Processor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032204 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1032205] Review Request: jamon-runtime - Jamon runtime support classes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032205 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1032205] Review Request: jamon-runtime - Jamon runtime support classes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032205 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1035129] Review Request: rubygem-ensure_valid_encoding - Replace bad bytes in given encoding with replacement strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035129 Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1031317] Review Request: rubygem-rttool - Converter from RT into various formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031317 Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1016863] Review Request: rubygem-parallel - Run any kind of code in parallel processes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016863 Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634760] Review Request: amavisd-milter - Sendmail milter for amavisd-new with support for the AM.PDP protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634760 Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1036319] Review Request: libnftables - Library for low-level interaction with nftables Netlink's API over libmnl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036319 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1036319] Review Request: libnftables - Library for low-level interaction with nftables Netlink's API over libmnl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036319 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634760] Review Request: amavisd-milter - Sendmail milter for amavisd-new with support for the AM.PDP protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634760 --- Comment #12 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com --- Hi Andy, I was going through my older bugs and ran across this one. I wanted to see if you're still interested in getting this into Fedora? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1035499] Review Request: mod_auth_mellon - A SAML 2.0 authentication module for the Apache Httpd Server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035499 Michele Baldessari mich...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mich...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Michele Baldessari mich...@redhat.com --- - Can you notify upstream about the new FSF address? The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file, possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF. - You set MellonLockFile /run/mod_auth_mellon/lock in the config, but I am not sure who creates /run/mod_auth_mellon (could not see that in the code) or if it should be package owned. Can you check that? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1034347] Review Request: libvirt-python - python binding for libvirt library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034347 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1034347] Review Request: libvirt-python - python binding for libvirt library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034347 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- virt-ma...@lists.fedoraproject.org is not a valid FAS account, please use the corresponding FAS account name. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 908088] Review Request: ascend - ASCEND modelling environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908088 Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||NotReady --- Comment #4 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com --- The development goes slowly and there are some things to fix. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1034347] Review Request: libvirt-python - python binding for libvirt library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034347 Daniel Berrange berra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Daniel Berrange berra...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: libvirt-python Short Description: The libvirt virtualization API python binding Owners: berrange crobinso veillard Branches: InitialCC: virtmaint -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
