[Bug 1046812] Review Request: jupp - Compact and feature-rich WordStar-compatible editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046812 Susi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1046812] Review Request: jupp - Compact and feature-rich WordStar-compatible editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046812 Susi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|susi.leht...@iki.fi Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Susi Lehtola --- Sure, might as well, looks simple enough. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033797] Review Request: golang-labix-mgo - The mgo rich MongoDB driver for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033797
--- Comment #2 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
In this case since we have an upstream version number, the %{release} tag
should be 1%{dist}.
Also, since upstream doesn't maintain tarballs, it's perhaps preferable to
include in comments the steps to generate the tarball.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 987738] Review Request: dput - Debian package upload tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #11 from Christopher Meng --- (In reply to František Dvořák from comment #10) > Yes, EL6 is OK. It should not need the modifications. Waiting for the new > version. :-) -- František Uh...New version? N-2 was released 1.5 years ago, N-1 released 0.5 years ago, awaiting what? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 459065] Review Request: italc - intelligent teaching and learning with computers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459065 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cicku...@gmail.com --- Comment #31 from Christopher Meng --- (In reply to q2dg from comment #30) > What about try it again? I think this kind of software it's a key factor in > schools. > > If you don't like Italc, there is also another interesting (and similar) > applications called Epoptes: http://www.epoptes.org I will package this one later per your request. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 951827] Review Request: alef-fonts - A free multi-lingual font designed for screens
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951827 --- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng --- Please use sed to do the hack, no need to use dos2unix(may also change the timestamp). Remove old packaging lines. Then I will run a full review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047062] Review Request: modem-manager-gui - Graphical interface for ModemManager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047062 Mario Blättermann changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On|1047021 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047021 [Bug 1047021] SELinux is preventing /usr/sbin/ModemManager from 'read' accesses on the chr_file urandom. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047062] Review Request: modem-manager-gui - Graphical interface for ModemManager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047062 Mario Blättermann changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Mario Blättermann --- Many thanks for the review and approval! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: modem-manager-gui Short Description: Graphical interface for ModemManager Owners: mariobl Branches: f20 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047062] Review Request: modem-manager-gui - Graphical interface for ModemManager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047062 --- Comment #6 from Mario Blättermann --- (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #5) > BTW, if a locale is not supported by Fedora filesystem, should we report it > as a bug? Yes, indeed... I was only looking for the content of the filesystem package, and there was nothing for the bn_BD locale. But while having a look on my own system, I found four files: [mariobl@localhost LC_MESSAGES]$ ls policycoreutils.mo system-config-services.mo system-config-date.mo system-config-users.mo The parent folders LC_MESSAGES and bn_BD stay unowned. It is worth a bug report, I've done this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048327 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 979124] Review Request: qbs - Qt Build Suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979124 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cicku...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #21 from Christopher Meng --- Decide to take it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1046340] Review Request: qtkeychain - A cross platform password store library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046340
--- Comment #9 from Christopher Meng ---
Please fetch the latest snapshot from git.
Also it has a tag 0.1.0, so your version should be 0.1.0.git(DATE).(COMMIT) or
something else:
[rpmaker@fab ~]$ rpmdev-vercmp
Epoch1: 0
Version1: 0.20130805
Release1: 1
Epoch2: 0
Version2: 0.1.0git20140104
Release2: 1
0:0.20130805-1 > 0:0.1.0git20140104-1
And, %{_libdir}/cmake looks like it shouldn't be owned by this one...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1046812] Review Request: jupp - Compact and feature-rich WordStar-compatible editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046812 --- Comment #4 from Robert Scheck --- Okay, changing the URL in the *.spec to something macro-free is not an issue. Are you interested in taking the review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048299] Review Request: fmpp - FreeMarker based preprocessor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048299 --- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo --- Sorry fmpp_0.9.14/lib/forbuild/classes/imageinfo/ImageInfo.java should be consider as bundled libraries [!]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1010613] Review Request: ck - Concurrency Kit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010613 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #9 from Christopher Meng --- Please review this one later after I update the SRPM. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1010613] Review Request: ck - Concurrency Kit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010613 Joseph Marrero changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jmarr...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jmarr...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048299] Review Request: fmpp - FreeMarker based preprocessor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048299
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"BSD (2 clause)", "Unknown or generated". 12 files have unknown license.
Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/gil/1048299-fmpp/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[!]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[.]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[?]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Java:
[x]: Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[x]: Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[x]: Javadoc subpackages should not have Requires: jpackage-utils
[x]: Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink)
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
Maven:
[x]: Pom files have correct Maven mapping
Note: Some add_maven_depmap calls found. Please check if they are correct
or update to latest guidelines
[x]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even
when building with ant
[x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used
[x]: Packages DOES NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-
utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
[x]: Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x]: Packages use %{_mavenpomdir} instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in fmpp-
javadoc
[x]: Package functi
[Bug 1046340] Review Request: qtkeychain - A cross platform password store library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046340 --- Comment #8 from Joseph Marrero --- thanks, I will do your review as soon I get home tonight. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1046340] Review Request: qtkeychain - A cross platform password store library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046340 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||cicku...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cicku...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Christopher Meng --- I need a review swap with bug 1010613. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1028743] Review Request: hans - IP over ICMP tunneling solution
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028743 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||cicku...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cicku...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 951827] Review Request: alef-fonts - A free multi-lingual font designed for screens
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951827 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||cicku...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cicku...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048299] Review Request: fmpp - FreeMarker based preprocessor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048299 --- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo --- Sorry BuildRequires: jpackage-utils Requires:jpackage-utils must be replaced by BuildRequires: javapackage-tools Requires:javapackage-tools -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048299] Review Request: fmpp - FreeMarker based preprocessor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048299
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
BuildRequires: jpackage-utils
Requires:jpackage-utils
must be replaced by
BuildRequires: jpackage-utils
Requires:jpackage-utils
rm -rf %{buildroot}is superfluous, please remove
%package javadoc
Group: Documentation is superfluous, please remove
Summary:Javadoc for %{name}
BuildArch: noarch is superfluous, please remove
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047062] Review Request: modem-manager-gui - Graphical interface for ModemManager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047062 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng --- PACKAGE APPROVED. BTW, if a locale is not supported by Fedora filesystem, should we report it as a bug? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1045756] Review Request: vdr-live - An interactive web interface for VDR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045756 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- vdr-live-0.3.0-7.69f84f9.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vdr-live-0.3.0-7.69f84f9.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047414] Review Request: ioping - Simple disk I/O latency monitoring tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047414 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng --- Thanks for the review. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ioping Short Description: Simple disk I/O latency monitoring tool Owners: cicku Branches: f19 f20 el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048299] Review Request: fmpp - FreeMarker based preprocessor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048299 --- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo --- javac target and souce *must* be set at least to 1.5 and source to UTF-8 Please change license field as: License:BSD or Public Domain Public Domain fmpp_0.9.14/lib/forbuild/classes/imageinfo/ImageInfo.java -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1046513] Review Request: glite-lb-state-machine - gLite Logging and Bookkeeping state machine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046513 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- glite-lb-state-machine-2.0.7-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glite-lb-state-machine-2.0.7-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1046513] Review Request: glite-lb-state-machine - gLite Logging and Bookkeeping state machine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046513 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1046513] Review Request: glite-lb-state-machine - gLite Logging and Bookkeeping state machine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046513 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- glite-lb-state-machine-2.0.7-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glite-lb-state-machine-2.0.7-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1046513] Review Request: glite-lb-state-machine - gLite Logging and Bookkeeping state machine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046513 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- glite-lb-state-machine-2.0.7-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glite-lb-state-machine-2.0.7-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048299] Review Request: fmpp - FreeMarker based preprocessor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048299 --- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo --- Please remove Class-Path frpm manifest and can use maven-upload task disabling only maven-ant-tasks support ...? in this way don't need anymore SOURCE1 e.g. /> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048299] Review Request: fmpp - FreeMarker based preprocessor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048299 --- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo --- Please change BuildRequires: mvn(bsh:bsh) Requires: mvn(bsh:bsh) with BuildRequires: mvn(org.beanshell:bsh) Requires: mvn(org.beanshell:bsh) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1045141] Review Request: python-jsonpath-rw - extended implementation of JSONPath for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045141 Steve Linabery changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Steve Linabery --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-jsonpath-rw Short Description: Extended implementation of JSONPath Owners: slinabery Branches: f19 f20 el6 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048299] Review Request: fmpp - FreeMarker based preprocessor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048299 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|punto...@libero.it Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1011962] Review Request: datanucleus-api-jdo - plugin for JDO support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011962 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1011962] Review Request: datanucleus-api-jdo - plugin for JDO support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011962 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- datanucleus-api-jdo-3.2.6-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/datanucleus-api-jdo-3.2.6-3.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048299] Review Request: fmpp - FreeMarker based preprocessor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048299 Will Benton changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048299] Review Request: fmpp - FreeMarker based preprocessor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048299 Will Benton changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1010003 (bigdata-review) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010003 [Bug 1010003] bigdata-sig review-tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048299] New: Review Request: fmpp - FreeMarker based preprocessor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048299 Bug ID: 1048299 Summary: Review Request: fmpp - FreeMarker based preprocessor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: wi...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://freevariable.com/fmpp/fmpp.spec SRPM URL: http://freevariable.com/fmpp/fmpp-0.9.14-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: FMPP is a general-purpose text file preprocessor tool that uses FreeMarker templates. Fedora Account System Username: willb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1044884] Review Request: perl-Role-Basic - Simplified Moose-like roles
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044884 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 960851] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Dav - Horde library for WebDAV, CalDAV, CardDAV
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960851 Remi Collet changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|notready| --- Comment #2 from Remi Collet --- php-sabre-dav 1.8 and php-sabre-vobject 2.1.3 are now available in fedora repo (sabredav channel is no more maintained, but old versions, without namespace, are still used by owncloud). To ensure the correct version is loaded, need to install only php-sabre-dav, or use php-horde-Horde-Autoloader 2.0.1-4 (in testing) which is patched to ensure correct load order. Changes: https://github.com/remicollet/remirepo/commit/273c45aa482a2a4a9d2c20d3846553e09950b118 Spec: https://raw.github.com/remicollet/remirepo/273c45aa482a2a4a9d2c20d3846553e09950b118/php/horde/php-horde-Horde-Dav/php-horde-Horde-Dav.spec Srpm: http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/php-horde-Horde-Dav-1.0.3-2.remi.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047551] Review Request: php-sabre-dav - WebDAV Framework for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047551 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- php-sabre-dav-1.8.7-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047532] Review Request: php-sabre-vobject - Library to parse and manipulate iCalendar and vCard objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047532 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- php-sabre-vobject-2.1.3-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 459065] Review Request: italc - intelligent teaching and learning with computers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459065 q2dg changed: What|Removed |Added CC||q...@yahoo.es --- Comment #30 from q2dg --- What about try it again? I think this kind of software it's a key factor in schools. If you don't like Italc, there is also another interesting (and similar) applications called Epoptes: http://www.epoptes.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1046813] Review Request: rubygem-cocaine - A small library for doing (command) lines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046813 Mamoru TASAKA changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Mamoru TASAKA --- Okay, simple package and clean. One thing: * Please write your real name on all history in %changelog - spec file clean - builds fine - rebuilt binary rpm clean - can be installed - An example explained in README.md works, and at least the following works: $ ruby -e "require 'cocaine/version' ; puts Cocaine::VERSION" 0.5.3 - This package (rubygem-cocaine) is APPROVED by mtasaka - -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 924682] Review Request: gimp-elsamuko - Elsamukos script collection for the GIMP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924682 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- gimp-elsamuko-24-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gimp-elsamuko-24-2.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 924682] Review Request: gimp-elsamuko - Elsamukos script collection for the GIMP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924682 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- gimp-elsamuko-24-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gimp-elsamuko-24-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 924682] Review Request: gimp-elsamuko - Elsamukos script collection for the GIMP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924682 Palle Ravn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-01-03 10:11:59 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1016809] Review Request: rodent - Advanced user file manager for Linux/BSD systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016809 --- Comment #13 from Antonio Trande --- (In reply to Mario Blättermann from comment #12) > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #11) > > Since Rodent and the required package librfm depend by dbh >= 5.0, I'll do a > > SCM Request when Fedora 21 will leave the rawhide status. > > > Not needed to wait. Just do the SCM request without requesting branches. > This way only the Rawhide part will be created. After branching f21 (which > will happen soon) the appropriate branch will be created automatically. That's great news for me! Thanks again. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1016809] Review Request: rodent - Advanced user file manager for Linux/BSD systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016809 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Antonio Trande --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: rodent Short Description: Advanced user file manager for Linux/BSD systems Owners: sagitter Branches: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048259] Review Request: qt5-qtconnectivity - Qt5 Connectivity module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048259 Lubomir Rintel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||lkund...@v3.sk Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lkund...@v3.sk Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel --- * Package is named correctly * Packaging the latest version * Good license, full text present * License tag correct * Rpmlint mostly happy (see above) * Proper compiler flags used * Builds fine in mock * Requires file * Provides fine * Filelist fine * SPEC file clean and legible, fairly standard Qt5 package APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1002828] Review Request: pure-glpk - GLPK interface for the Pure programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002828 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- pure-glpk-0.4-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048260] Review Request: qt5-qtlocation - Qt5 Location module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048260 Lubomir Rintel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||lkund...@v3.sk Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lkund...@v3.sk Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel --- 0.) Rpmlint complains; I believe both are trivial: qt5-qtlocation.i686: E: description-line-too-long C The Qt Sensors API provides access to sensor hardware via QML and C++ interfaces. Your description lines must not exceed 80 characters. If a line is exceeding this number, cut it to fit in two lines. qt5-qtlocation-doc.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/qt5/qtpositioning/demos-manifest.xml * Package is named correctly * Packaging the latest version * Good license, full text present * License tag correct * Rpmlint mostly happy (see above) * Proper compiler flags used * Builds fine in mock * Requires file * Provides fine * Filelist fine * SPEC file clean and legible, fairly standard Qt5 package APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048040] Review Request: qt5-qtserialport - Qt5 Serialport module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048040
Lubomir Rintel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel ---
0.) You may want to use a bcond here; so that it's a bit more readable and
rpmbuild --without works:
# define to build docs, need to undef this for bootstrapping
%define docs 1
...
%if 0%{?docs}
%bcond_without docs
...
%if %with docs
1.) You may want to %exclude this one:
qt5-qtserialport-doc.noarch: E: zero-length
/usr/share/doc/qt5/qtserialport/demos-manifest.xml
* Package is named correctly
* Packaging the latest version
* Good license, full text present
* License tag correct
* Rpmlint mostly happy (see above)
* Requires file
* Provides fine
* Filelist fine
* SPEC file clean and legible, fairly standard Qt5 package
APPROVED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048040] Review Request: qt5-qtserialport - Qt5 Serialport module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048040 Lubomir Rintel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||lkund...@v3.sk Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lkund...@v3.sk Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048260] Review Request: qt5-qtlocation - Qt5 Location module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048260 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||928937 (qt-reviews) Alias||qt5-qtlocation Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928937 [Bug 928937] Qt-related package review tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1046340] Review Request: qtkeychain - A cross platform password store library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046340 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu Alias||qtkeychain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 924682] Review Request: gimp-elsamuko - Elsamukos script collection for the GIMP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924682 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048040] Review Request: qt5-qtserialport - Qt5 Serialport module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048040 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |qt5-qtserialport - Qt |qt5-qtserialport - Qt5 |Serial Port provides the|Serialport module |basic functionality, which | |includes configuring, I/O | |operations, getting and | |setting the control signals | |of the RS-232 pinouts. | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 924682] Review Request: gimp-elsamuko - Elsamukos script collection for the GIMP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924682 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 979124] Review Request: qbs - Qt Build Suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979124 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||qbs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048260] New: Review Request: qt5-qtlocation - Qt5 Location module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048260 Bug ID: 1048260 Summary: Review Request: qt5-qtlocation - Qt5 Location module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: rdie...@math.unl.edu QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qt5/qt5-qtlocation.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qt5/qt5-qtlocation-5.2.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: The Qt Positioning API gives developers the ability to determine a position by using a variety of possible sources, including satellite, or wifi, or text file, and so on. That information can then be used to for example determine a position on a map. In addition satellite information can be retrieved and area based monitoring can be performed. Fedora Account System Username: rdieter scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6353069 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 924682] Review Request: gimp-elsamuko - Elsamukos script collection for the GIMP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924682 --- Comment #11 from Palle Ravn --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: gimp-elsamuko Short Description: Script collection for the GIMP Owners: paller Branches: f19 f20 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 924682] Review Request: gimp-elsamuko - Elsamukos script collection for the GIMP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924682 Palle Ravn changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048259] New: Review Request: qt5-qtconnectivity - Qt5 Connectivity module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048259 Bug ID: 1048259 Summary: Review Request: qt5-qtconnectivity - Qt5 Connectivity module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: rdie...@math.unl.edu QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qt5/qt5-qtconnectivity.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qt5/qt5-qtconnectivity-5.2.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: Qt5 Connectivity module Fedora Account System Username: rdieter scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6353147 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048259] Review Request: qt5-qtconnectivity - Qt5 Connectivity module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048259 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||928937 (qt-reviews) Alias||qt5-qtconnectivity Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928937 [Bug 928937] Qt-related package review tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048040] Review Request: qt5-qtserialport - Qt Serial Port provides the basic functionality, which includes configuring, I/O operations, getting and setting the control signals of the RS-232 pin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048040 --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter --- scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6353143 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 924682] Review Request: gimp-elsamuko - Elsamukos script collection for the GIMP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924682
--- Comment #10 from Palle Ravn ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #8)
> > > 2. %{_datarootdir} -> %{_datadir}
> >
> > Done.
>
> Done?
>
> %{_datarootdir}/gimp/2.0/scripts/*.scm
I missed that one, sorry for that.
> > > 4. If you don't have any special need, you should remove threaded blank
> > > lines.
> >
> > It's a topic for endless debate. I use 2 empty lines in all my SPEC files,
> > and I will continue doing so. "All RPM sections, starting from %description,
> > should be separated by two empty lines." -cite
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PeterGordon/SpecFormattingGuidelines
> >
> > The new SPEC and RPM files are hosted at gimp-elsamuko.zom.dk
>
> Peter is not god or standard as far as I know. But I never force you to
> change the style, I only wanted you to remove these:
>
> Source0:https://sites.google.com/site/elsamuko/gimp/elsamuko.zip
>
> Requires: gimp
>
> BuildArch: noarch
>
> --->
> Source0:https://sites.google.com/site/elsamuko/gimp/elsamuko.zip
> Requires: gimp
> BuildArch: noarch
>
>
I misunderstood that one. I will remove the empty lines.
> Please remember to add COPYING file as %doc when upstream releases new
> tarball. *This is a MUST*.
I made a comment in the %files section to remember this.
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #9)
> Also, it's better to leave a blank line between each changelog.
I will start doing that.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048039] Review Request: qt5-qtsensors - Qt5 - Sensors module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048039 --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter --- Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6353073 (sorry, refereshed the .src.rpm since original submission) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047062] Review Request: modem-manager-gui - Graphical interface for ModemManager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047062 --- Comment #4 from Mario Blättermann --- I've removed the bn_BD locale in %prep. Besides that, I've added summary, description and man page in German. New files: Spec URL: http://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/modem-manager-gui.spec SRPM URL: http://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/modem-manager-gui-0.0.16-4.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047551] Review Request: php-sabre-dav - WebDAV Framework for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047551 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- php-sabre-dav-1.8.7-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-sabre-dav-1.8.7-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047551] Review Request: php-sabre-dav - WebDAV Framework for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047551 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- php-sabre-dav-1.8.7-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-sabre-dav-1.8.7-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047551] Review Request: php-sabre-dav - WebDAV Framework for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047551 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047551] Review Request: php-sabre-dav - WebDAV Framework for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047551 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- php-sabre-dav-1.8.7-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-sabre-dav-1.8.7-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047497] Review Request: otcl - MIT Object Tcl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047497 --- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng --- Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated Issues: === - Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files directly in %_libdir. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DevelPackages - Static libraries in -static or -devel subpackage, providing -devel if present. Note: Package has .a files: otcl. Illegal package name: otcl. Does not provide -static: otcl. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#StaticLibraries = MUST items = C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated". 4 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck: Unknown or generated otcl-1.14/otcl.c otcl-1.14/otcl.h otcl-1.14/otclAppInit.c otcl-1.14/otkAppInit.c ---> Tell upstream. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/b4(gcc- debuginfo, glibc-debuginfo), /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin(gcc-debuginfo, sqlite-debuginfo, glibc-debuginfo-common, ncurses-debuginfo, lnav- debuginfo, bzip2-debuginfo, pcre-debuginfo, openssl-debuginfo), /usr/lib/debug/.build-id(readline-debuginfo, sqlite-debuginfo, glibc- debuginfo-common, gcc-base-debuginfo, gcc-debuginfo, glibc-debuginfo, zlib-debuginfo, ncurses-debuginfo, lnav-debuginfo, bzip2-debuginfo, pcre- debuginfo, openssl-debuginfo), /usr/lib/debug/.dwz(readline-debuginfo, sqlite-debuginfo, zlib-debuginfo, ncurses-debuginfo, bzip2-debuginfo, pcre-debuginfo, openssl-debuginfo), /usr/lib/debug(readline-debuginfo, sqlite-debuginfo, glibc-debuginfo-common, gcc-base-debuginfo, gcc- debuginfo, glibc-debuginfo, zlib-debuginfo, ncurses-debuginfo, lnav- debuginfo, bzip2-debuginfo, filesystem, pcre-debuginfo, openssl- debuginfo), /usr/lib/debug/usr(gcc-debuginfo, sqlite-debuginfo, glibc- debuginfo-common, gcc-base-debuginfo, glibc-debuginfo, zlib-debuginfo, ncurses-debuginfo, lnav-debuginfo, bzip2-debuginfo, filesystem, pcre- debuginfo), /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/73(gcc-debuginfo), /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib(readline-debuginfo, sqlite-debuginfo, gcc-base- debuginfo, gcc-debuginfo, glibc-debuginfo, zlib-debuginfo, ncurses- debuginfo, bzip2-debuginfo, pcre-debuginfo, openssl-debuginfo), /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/eb(glibc-debuginfo) [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 296960 bytes in 9 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package requires o
[Bug 1047414] Review Request: ioping - Simple disk I/O latency monitoring tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047414 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Orion Poplawski --- That does the trick - APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047414] Review Request: ioping - Simple disk I/O latency monitoring tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047414 --- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng --- Spec URL: http://cicku.me/ioping.spec SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/ioping-0.8-2.fc21.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047532] Review Request: php-sabre-vobject - Library to parse and manipulate iCalendar and vCard objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047532 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047532] Review Request: php-sabre-vobject - Library to parse and manipulate iCalendar and vCard objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047532 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- php-sabre-vobject-2.1.3-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-sabre-vobject-2.1.3-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047532] Review Request: php-sabre-vobject - Library to parse and manipulate iCalendar and vCard objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047532 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- php-sabre-vobject-2.1.3-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-sabre-vobject-2.1.3-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047532] Review Request: php-sabre-vobject - Library to parse and manipulate iCalendar and vCard objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047532 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- php-sabre-vobject-2.1.3-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-sabre-vobject-2.1.3-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1045141] Review Request: python-jsonpath-rw - extended implementation of JSONPath for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045141
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from Christopher Meng ---
No problem, happy new yarr!
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"Unknown or generated". 16 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck:
Unknown or generated
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3/%{py3dir}/jsonpath_rw/__init__.py
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3/%{py3dir}/jsonpath_rw/jsonpath.py
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3/%{py3dir}/jsonpath_rw/lexer.py
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3/%{py3dir}/jsonpath_rw/parser.py
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3/%{py3dir}/setup.py
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3/%{py3dir}/tests/test_jsonpath.py
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3/%{py3dir}/tests/test_lexer.py
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3/%{py3dir}/tests/test_parser.py
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3/jsonpath_rw/__init__.py
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3/jsonpath_rw/jsonpath.py
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3/jsonpath_rw/lexer.py
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3/jsonpath_rw/parser.py
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3/setup.py
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3/tests/test_jsonpath.py
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3/tests/test_lexer.py
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3/tests/test_parser.py
---> Tell upstream.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 61440 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include lice
[Bug 1047804] Review Request: ghc-regex-base - Haskell regex base library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047804 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047804] Review Request: ghc-regex-base - Haskell regex base library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047804 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047746] Review Request: ghc-html - HTML combinator library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047746 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047746] Review Request: ghc-html - HTML combinator library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047746 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047551] Review Request: php-sabre-dav - WebDAV Framework for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047551 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047551] Review Request: php-sabre-dav - WebDAV Framework for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047551 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047532] Review Request: php-sabre-vobject - Library to parse and manipulate iCalendar and vCard objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047532 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1044884] Review Request: perl-Role-Basic - Simplified Moose-like roles
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044884 --- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng --- Wrong cvs flag :-0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047532] Review Request: php-sabre-vobject - Library to parse and manipulate iCalendar and vCard objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047532 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1046842] Review Request: python-ofxparse - Python library for working with the Open Financial Exchange file format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046842 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1046842] Review Request: python-ofxparse - Python library for working with the Open Financial Exchange file format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046842 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1046513] Review Request: glite-lb-state-machine - gLite Logging and Bookkeeping state machine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046513 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1046513] Review Request: glite-lb-state-machine - gLite Logging and Bookkeeping state machine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046513 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1008532] Review Request: copr - Cool Other Package Repo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008532 --- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048039] Review Request: qt5-qtsensors - Qt5 - Sensors module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048039 --- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng --- RPM build errors: Directory not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/qt5-qtsensors-5.2.0-1.fc21.i386/usr/lib/qt5/qml/QtSensors -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1008532] Review Request: copr - Cool Other Package Repo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008532 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1046688] Review Request: netsurf-buildsystem - makefiles shared by NetSurf projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046688 --- Comment #6 from Christopher Meng --- David, will netsurf* be available for f20? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048039] Review Request: qt5-qtsensors - Qt5 - Sensors module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048039 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||cicku...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cicku...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Christopher Meng --- Taken. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
