[Bug 1055482] Review Request: qpid-proton-java - Java libraries for Qpid Proton
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055482 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005782] Review Request: uimaj - Apache UIMA is an implementation of the OASIS-UIMA specifications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782 Bug 1005782 depends on bug 1005779, which changed state. Bug 1005779 Summary: Review Request: uima-parent-pom - Apache UIMA Parent POM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005779 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005779] Review Request: uima-parent-pom - Apache UIMA Parent POM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005779 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||uima-parent-pom-8-3.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-01-30 23:30:29 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- uima-parent-pom-8-3.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 929041] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Kolab-Storage - A package for handling Kolab data stored on an IMAP server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=929041 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||php-horde-Horde-Kolab-Stora ||ge-2.0.5-1.fc20 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- php-horde-Horde-Kolab-Storage-2.0.5-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1021017] Review Request: lexertl - Modular lexical analyzer generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021017 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||lexertl-2013.11.20-1.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-01-30 23:29:09 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- lexertl-2013.11.20-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1055148] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Mapi - MAPI utility library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055148 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||php-horde-Horde-Mapi-1.0.2- ||1.fc20 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- php-horde-Horde-Mapi-1.0.2-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1051901] Review Request: rubygem-rgen - Ruby Modelling and Generator Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051901 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|rubygem-rgen-0.6.6-2.fc20 |rubygem-rgen-0.6.6-2.fc19 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- rubygem-rgen-0.6.6-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1057915] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-Form - Construct HTTP::Request objects for form processing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057915 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-HTTP-Request-Form-0.952-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1054867] Review Request: perl-Lingua-EN-Sentence - Module for splitting text into sentences
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054867 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Lingua-EN-Sentence-0.2 |perl-Lingua-EN-Sentence-0.2 |5-1.fc19|5-1.fc20 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Lingua-EN-Sentence-0.25-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1055482] Review Request: qpid-proton-java - Java libraries for Qpid Proton
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055482 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|qpid-proton-java-0.6-2.fc19 |qpid-proton-java-0.6-2.fc20 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- qpid-proton-java-0.6-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1054867] Review Request: perl-Lingua-EN-Sentence - Module for splitting text into sentences
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054867 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Lingua-EN-Sentence-0.2 ||5-1.fc19 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-01-30 23:24:43 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Lingua-EN-Sentence-0.25-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1055802] Review Request: sbinary - typed Scala interface to binary formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055802 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||sbinary-0.4.2-1.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-01-30 23:24:20 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- sbinary-0.4.2-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1055799] Review Request: sbt - simple build tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055799 Bug 1055799 depends on bug 1055802, which changed state. Bug 1055802 Summary: Review Request: sbinary - typed Scala interface to binary formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055802 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1055039] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Pack - Horde Pack Utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055039 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||php-horde-Horde-Pack-1.0.0- ||1.fc20 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- php-horde-Horde-Pack-1.0.0-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1055800] Review Request: test-interface - uniform interface to Scala testing frameworks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055800 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||test-interface-1.0-2.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-01-30 23:22:51 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- test-interface-1.0-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1055799] Review Request: sbt - simple build tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055799 Bug 1055799 depends on bug 1055800, which changed state. Bug 1055800 Summary: Review Request: test-interface - uniform interface to Scala testing frameworks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055800 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1055482] Review Request: qpid-proton-java - Java libraries for Qpid Proton
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055482 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||qpid-proton-java-0.6-2.fc19 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-01-30 23:22:37 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- qpid-proton-java-0.6-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 929040] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Kolab-Session - A package managing an active Kolab session
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=929040 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||php-horde-Horde-Kolab-Sessi ||on-2.0.1-1.fc20 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- php-horde-Horde-Kolab-Session-2.0.1-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1000359] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Smtp - Horde SMTP Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000359 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||php-horde-Horde-Smtp-1.3.1- ||1.fc20 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- php-horde-Horde-Smtp-1.3.1-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1059942] Review Request: ghc-network - Network library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059942 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||ghc-network -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1059942] Review Request: ghc-network - Network library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059942 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: ghc-network |Review Request: ghc-network |- Low-level networking |- Network library |interface | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1059942] Review Request: ghc-network - Low-level networking interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059942 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen --- (This also brings us within one more library (HTTP) of the milestone to repackage cabal-install out of haskell-platform.:) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1038087] Review Request: ghc-parsec - Monadic parser combinators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038087 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1059942 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059942 [Bug 1059942] Review Request: ghc-network - Low-level networking interface -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1059942] Review Request: ghc-network - Low-level networking interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059942 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1038087 (ghc-parsec) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038087 [Bug 1038087] Review Request: ghc-parsec - Monadic parser combinators -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1059942] Review Request: ghc-network - Low-level networking interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059942 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||haskell-devel@lists.fedorap ||roject.org Whiteboard||Ready --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen --- This is a re-review to pull network out of the haskell-platform package. (See bug 523884.) network has close to 600 reverse dependencies in Hackage: http://packdeps.haskellers.com/reverse/network -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1059942] New: Review Request: ghc-network - Low-level networking interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059942 Bug ID: 1059942 Summary: Review Request: ghc-network - Low-level networking interface Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: peter...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-network.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-network-2.4.1.2-30.fc18.src.rpm Description: Low-level networking interface. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1059942] Review Request: ghc-network - Low-level networking interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059942 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen --- This package built on koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6474395 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058809] Review Request: mod_intercept_form_submit - Apache module to intercept login form submission and run PAM authentication.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058809 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058809] Review Request: mod_intercept_form_submit - Apache module to intercept login form submission and run PAM authentication.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058809 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- mod_authnz_pam-0.8.1-1.fc20,mod_intercept_form_submit-0.9.5-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mod_authnz_pam-0.8.1-1.fc20,mod_intercept_form_submit-0.9.5-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058805] Review Request: mod_authnz_pam - PAM authorization checker and PAM Basic Authentication provider
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058805 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- mod_authnz_pam-0.8.1-1.fc20,mod_intercept_form_submit-0.9.5-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mod_authnz_pam-0.8.1-1.fc20,mod_intercept_form_submit-0.9.5-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058805] Review Request: mod_authnz_pam - PAM authorization checker and PAM Basic Authentication provider
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058805 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1009842] Rename Request: ghc-highlighting-kate - Sourcecode syntax highlighting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009842 --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ghc-highlighting-kate Short Description: Sourcecode syntax highlighting Owners: petersen Branches: f20 f19 el6 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1009842] Rename Request: ghc-highlighting-kate - Sourcecode syntax highlighting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009842 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|POST Whiteboard|Ready | Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen --- Thank you for reviewing. (In reply comment #10) > [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and > Provides are present. I just confirm that the new package does obsolete the old one properly: $ rpm -qp --obsoletes ghc-highlighting-kate-devel-0.5.6-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm highlighting-kate < 0.5.6-1.fc20 $ rpm -qp --provides ghc-highlighting-kate-devel-0.5.6-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm ghc-highlighting-kate-static = 0.5.6-1.fc20 | grep ^high highlighting-kate = 0.5.6-1.fc20 as mentioned in comment 5. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1038087] Review Request: ghc-parsec - Monadic parser combinators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038087 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|Ready | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1038087] Review Request: ghc-parsec - Monadic parser combinators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038087 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|POST Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen --- Thank you for reviewing the package. Package Change Request == Package Name: ghc-parsec New Branches: f20 f19 Owners: petersen InitialCC: haskell-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1057670] Review Request: jetty8 - jetty compatibility package (libs only)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057670 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1057670] Review Request: jetty8 - jetty compatibility package (libs only)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057670 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- jetty8-8.1.14-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jetty8-8.1.14-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1055020] Review Request:openpgpkey-milter - OPENPGPKEY basd automatic encryption of emails using the milter API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055020 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- openpgpkey-milter-0.2-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openpgpkey-milter-0.2-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1055020] Review Request:openpgpkey-milter - OPENPGPKEY basd automatic encryption of emails using the milter API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055020 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1055020] Review Request:openpgpkey-milter - OPENPGPKEY basd automatic encryption of emails using the milter API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055020 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- openpgpkey-milter-0.2-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openpgpkey-milter-0.2-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1055800] Review Request: test-interface - uniform interface to Scala testing frameworks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055800 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- test-interface-1.0-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/test-interface-1.0-3.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 694139] Review Request: openvas-gsd - Greenbone Security Desktop client application for OpenVAS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694139 Michal Ambroz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Flags|needinfo?(re...@seznam.cz) | Last Closed||2014-01-30 17:05:34 --- Comment #14 from Michal Ambroz --- Yes we can close this one ... not supported in the 7.x branch anyway. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874105] Review Request: qpid-proton - Proton is a high performance, lightweight messaging library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874105 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874105] Review Request: qpid-proton - Proton is a high performance, lightweight messaging library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874105 --- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874105] Review Request: qpid-proton - Proton is a high performance, lightweight messaging library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874105 Darryl L. Pierce changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Darryl L. Pierce --- Package Change Request == Package Name: qpid-proton New Branches: epel7 Owners: mcpierce -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1059803] Review Request: sniproxy - Transparent TLS proxy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059803
--- Comment #1 from Michael Scherer ---
Hi,
so :
- BuildRoot is no longer used
- the license should be shipped in %doc
- adding a few others files for documentation would be nice
- %changelog is empty
- rm -rf %{buildroot} in %install is not needed
- why does it buildRequires curl and perl
- %configure CFLAGS="-I/usr/include/libev"
seems wrong, since it erase the CFLAGS set by configure.
Try instead :
export CFLAGS="-I/usr/include/libev"
%configure
- why is there a patch, was it sent upstream ? ( cause I see it fix various
bugs, but we should document the fact it was sent upstream if that's the case,
and send it if that's not the case ( and go back to case 1 ))
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1055721] Review Request: qpid-dispatch - Dispatch router for Qpid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055721 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- qpid-dispatch-0.1-3.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qpid-dispatch-0.1-3.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1055721] Review Request: qpid-dispatch - Dispatch router for Qpid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055721 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- qpid-dispatch-0.1-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qpid-dispatch-0.1-3.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1059803] Review Request: sniproxy - Transparent TLS proxy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059803 Michael Scherer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@zarb.org Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@zarb.org Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1059708] Review Request: phodav - a WebDAV server using libsoup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059708
--- Comment #3 from Michael Scherer ---
Also :
- BuildRoot is no longer needed
- %clean
rm -rf %{buildroot} , the rm at start of install and %defattr are also uneeded
for newer fedora
- chezdav and the spice subpackage do have the same summary
- there is no service file, while this is a daemon
- the spice subpackage should have the lciense in %doc as well, since it can be
install without pulling chezdav
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1059708] Review Request: phodav - a WebDAV server using libsoup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059708 Michael Scherer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@zarb.org --- Comment #2 from Michael Scherer --- Mhh, it doesn't build on F20 : checking whether NLS is requested... yes ./configure: line 12254: intltool-update: command not found checking for intltool >= 0.40.0... found configure: error: Your intltool is too old. You need intltool 0.40.0 or later. erreur : Mauvais statut de sortie pour /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.MgeUdM (%build) Mauvais statut de sortie pour /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.MgeUdM (%build) Erreur de construction de RPM : Seems to be missing a BR, like intltool -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1057670] Review Request: jetty8 - jetty compatibility package (libs only)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057670 --- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1057670] Review Request: jetty8 - jetty compatibility package (libs only)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057670 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048493] Review Request: icecat - GNU version of Firefox browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048493 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(de...@fateyev.com ||) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1057670] Review Request: jetty8 - jetty compatibility package (libs only)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057670 Pete MacKinnon changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Pete MacKinnon --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: jetty8 Short Description: Jetty 8 compatibility package Owners: mizdebsk pmackinn Branches: f20 InitialCC: java-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1057915] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-Form - Construct HTTP::Request objects for form processing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057915 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-HTTP-Request-Form-0.952-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTTP-Request-Form-0.952-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1057915] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-Form - Construct HTTP::Request objects for form processing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057915 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1059805] New: Review Request: greenmail - Suite of email servers for testing purposes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059805 Bug ID: 1059805 Summary: Review Request: greenmail - Suite of email servers for testing purposes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: rr...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://rrati.fedorapeople.org/greenmail.spec SRPM URL: http://rrati.fedorapeople.org/greenmail-1.3.1b-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: GreenMail is an intuitive and easy-to-use test suite of email servers for testing purposes. It supports SMTP, POP3, IMAP with SSL socket support. GreenMail also provides a JBoss GreenMail Service. Fedora Account System Username: rrati -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1059803] New: Review Request: sniproxy - Transparent TLS proxy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059803 Bug ID: 1059803 Summary: Review Request: sniproxy - Transparent TLS proxy Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: nmavr...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/nmavrogi/fedora/sniproxy.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/nmavrogi/fedora/sniproxy-0.1-1.gitb341be8.fc20.src.rpm Description: Proxies incoming HTTP and TLS connections based on the hostname contained in the initial request. This enables HTTPS name based virtual hosting to seperate backend servers without the installing the private key on the proxy machine. Fedora Account System Username: nmav -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1009842] Rename Request: ghc-highlighting-kate - Sourcecode syntax highlighting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009842
Shakthi Kannan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #10 from Shakthi Kannan ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[-]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[-]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"Unknown or generated". 110 files have unknown license. Detailed output
of licensecheck in 1009842-ghc-highlighting-kate/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags sho
[Bug 1038087] Review Request: ghc-parsec - Monadic parser combinators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038087
Shakthi Kannan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Shakthi Kannan ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[-]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"Unknown or generated". 26 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in 1038087-ghc-parsec/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI
[Bug 1057670] Review Request: jetty8 - jetty compatibility package (libs only)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057670 Will Benton changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Will Benton --- Thanks for making the change, Pete! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1057670] Review Request: jetty8 - jetty compatibility package (libs only)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057670 Will Benton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1057670] Review Request: jetty8 - jetty compatibility package (libs only)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057670
--- Comment #12 from Pete MacKinnon ---
Spec URL: http://pmackinn.fedorapeople.org/jetty8/jetty8.spec
SRPM URL: http://pmackinn.fedorapeople.org/jetty8/jetty8-8.1.14-1.fc21.src.rpm
Mikolaj's version with %{_javadir}/jetty8 in %files.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058923] Review Request: eclipse-m2e-buildhelper - M2E Build Helper connector
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058923 Mikolaj Izdebski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-01-30 11:03:18 --- Comment #5 from Mikolaj Izdebski --- Rawhide build completed: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6472414 Closing. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 970393] Review Request: foo2zjs - Driver for printers of various wire protocols
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393 --- Comment #12 from Christopher Atherton --- New revision based on suggestions: SPEC => https://www.dropbox.com/s/vzqpit9ten7ufle/foo2zjs.spec SRPM => https://www.dropbox.com/s/d7216fijemfd5lz/foo2zjs-0.20140126-1.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058809] Review Request: mod_intercept_form_submit - Apache module to intercept login form submission and run PAM authentication.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058809 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058805] Review Request: mod_authnz_pam - PAM authorization checker and PAM Basic Authentication provider
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058805 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Don't request f21, not branched, still devel which is automatic. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058809] Review Request: mod_intercept_form_submit - Apache module to intercept login form submission and run PAM authentication.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058809 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058805] Review Request: mod_authnz_pam - PAM authorization checker and PAM Basic Authentication provider
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058805 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058923] Review Request: eclipse-m2e-buildhelper - M2E Build Helper connector
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058923 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058923] Review Request: eclipse-m2e-buildhelper - M2E Build Helper connector
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058923 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058805] Review Request: mod_authnz_pam - PAM authorization checker and PAM Basic Authentication provider
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058805 Jan Pazdziora changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Jan Pazdziora --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: mod_authnz_pam Short Description: PAM authorization checker and PAM Basic Authentication provider Owners: adelton Branches: f20 f21 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058809] Review Request: mod_intercept_form_submit - Apache module to intercept login form submission and run PAM authentication.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058809 Jan Pazdziora changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058809] Review Request: mod_intercept_form_submit - Apache module to intercept login form submission and run PAM authentication.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058809 --- Comment #7 from Jan Pazdziora --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: mod_intercept_form_submit Short Description: Apache module to intercept login form submission and run PAM authentication Owners: adelton Branches: f20 f21 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058923] Review Request: eclipse-m2e-buildhelper - M2E Build Helper connector
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058923
Robert Rati changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Robert Rati ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"Unknown or generated". 6 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/rrati/review/1058923-eclipse-m2e-
buildhelper/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Java:
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL).
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
= EXTRA items =
Ge
[Bug 1058805] Review Request: mod_authnz_pam - PAM authorization checker and PAM Basic Authentication provider
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058805 --- Comment #6 from Rob Crittenden --- OK, changes look good. Can't believe I missed the httpd-mmn thing :-( -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058923] Review Request: eclipse-m2e-buildhelper - M2E Build Helper connector
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058923 Mikolaj Izdebski changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Mikolaj Izdebski --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: eclipse-m2e-buildhelper Short Description: M2E Build Helper connector Owners: mizdebsk msrb sochotni Branches: f20 InitialCC: java-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 Neal Becker changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ndbeck...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Neal Becker --- I built http://nalimilan.perso.neuf.fr/transfert/julia-0.2.0-2.fc19.src.rpm on f20 x86_64 OK, but: sudo yum install rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/julia* [sudo] password for nbecker: Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks, merge-conf, refresh-packagekit Repository google-chrome is listed more than once in the configuration Examining rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/julia-base-0.2.0-2.fc20.x86_64.rpm: julia-base-0.2.0-2.fc20.x86_64 Marking rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/julia-base-0.2.0-2.fc20.x86_64.rpm to be installed Examining rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/julia-debuginfo-0.2.0-2.fc20.x86_64.rpm: julia-debuginfo-0.2.0-2.fc20.x86_64 Marking rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/julia-debuginfo-0.2.0-2.fc20.x86_64.rpm to be installed Examining rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/julia-devel-0.2.0-2.fc20.x86_64.rpm: julia-devel-0.2.0-2.fc20.x86_64 Marking rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/julia-devel-0.2.0-2.fc20.x86_64.rpm to be installed Examining rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/julia-doc-0.2.0-2.fc20.x86_64.rpm: julia-doc-0.2.0-2.fc20.x86_64 Marking rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/julia-doc-0.2.0-2.fc20.x86_64.rpm to be installed Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package julia-base.x86_64 0:0.2.0-2.fc20 will be installed ---> Package julia-debuginfo.x86_64 0:0.2.0-2.fc20 will be installed ---> Package julia-devel.x86_64 0:0.2.0-2.fc20 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: julia(x86-64) = 0.2.0-2.fc20 for package: julia-devel-0.2.0-2.fc20.x86_64 Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * fedora: fedora.mirrors.tds.net * rpmfusion-free: mirror.us.leaseweb.net * rpmfusion-free-updates: mirror.us.leaseweb.net * rpmfusion-nonfree: mirror.us.leaseweb.net * rpmfusion-nonfree-updates: mirror.us.leaseweb.net * updates: fedora.mirrors.tds.net ---> Package julia-doc.x86_64 0:0.2.0-2.fc20 will be installed --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: julia-devel-0.2.0-2.fc20.x86_64 (/julia-devel-0.2.0-2.fc20.x86_64) Requires: julia(x86-64) = 0.2.0-2.fc20 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058897] Review Request: eclipse-m2e-plexus - M2E Plexus connector
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058897 Mikolaj Izdebski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-01-30 09:16:11 --- Comment #5 from Mikolaj Izdebski --- Rawhide build completed: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6471705 Closing. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058809] Review Request: mod_intercept_form_submit - Apache module to intercept login form submission and run PAM authentication.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058809 Jan Cholasta changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jan Cholasta --- OK. ACK. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058902] Review Request: eclipse-m2e-sisu - M2E Sisu connector
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058902 Mikolaj Izdebski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-01-30 08:53:43 --- Comment #5 from Mikolaj Izdebski --- Rawhide build completed: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6471700 Closing. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058893] Review Request: eclipse-m2e-mavenarchiver - M2E Maven Archiver connector
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058893 Mikolaj Izdebski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-01-30 08:44:08 --- Comment #5 from Mikolaj Izdebski --- Rawhide build completed: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6471701 Closing. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058805] Review Request: mod_authnz_pam - PAM authorization checker and PAM Basic Authentication provider
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058805 --- Comment #5 from Jan Pazdziora --- Oops -- we've lost -lpam in the changes, adding it back: http://fedorapeople.org/cgit/adelton/public_git/mod_authnz_pam.git/diff/?id=mod_authnz_pam-0.8.1 http://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/adelton/identity_demo/fedora-19-x86_64/mod_authnz_pam-0.8.1-1.fc19/mod_authnz_pam-0.8.1-1.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1059393] Review Request: eclipse-m2e-egit - M2E SCM Handler for EGit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059393 Mikolaj Izdebski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-01-30 08:39:47 --- Comment #5 from Mikolaj Izdebski --- Rawhide build completed: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6471704 Closing. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058883] Review Request: eclipse-m2e-modello - M2E Modello connector
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058883 Mikolaj Izdebski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-01-30 08:38:57 --- Comment #6 from Mikolaj Izdebski --- Rawhide build completed: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6471703 Closing. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058914] Review Request: eclipse-m2e-cxf - M2E CXF connector
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058914 Mikolaj Izdebski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-01-30 08:38:07 --- Comment #5 from Mikolaj Izdebski --- Rawhide build completed: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6471702 Closing. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058911] Review Request: eclipse-m2e-antlr - M2E ANTLR connector
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058911 Mikolaj Izdebski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-01-30 08:38:06 --- Comment #5 from Mikolaj Izdebski --- Rawhide build completed: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6471699 Closing. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058809] Review Request: mod_intercept_form_submit - Apache module to intercept login form submission and run PAM authentication.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058809 --- Comment #5 from Jan Pazdziora --- (In reply to Jan Cholasta from comment #4) > Did you delete the changelog on purpose or was it an accident? Kinda on purpose. The guidelines say that you should not be describing the details of individual changes which is what the changelog did. Besides, for new package in Fedora, there really is no point having more that one line there. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1056335] Review Request: scalacheck - property-based testing for Scala
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1056335 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1056335] Review Request: scalacheck - property-based testing for Scala
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1056335 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058809] Review Request: mod_intercept_form_submit - Apache module to intercept login form submission and run PAM authentication.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058809 --- Comment #4 from Jan Cholasta --- Did you delete the changelog on purpose or was it an accident? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1059393] Review Request: eclipse-m2e-egit - M2E SCM Handler for EGit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059393 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058914] Review Request: eclipse-m2e-cxf - M2E CXF connector
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058914 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058911] Review Request: eclipse-m2e-antlr - M2E ANTLR connector
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058911 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1059393] Review Request: eclipse-m2e-egit - M2E SCM Handler for EGit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059393 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058914] Review Request: eclipse-m2e-cxf - M2E CXF connector
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058914 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058893] Review Request: eclipse-m2e-mavenarchiver - M2E Maven Archiver connector
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058893 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058897] Review Request: eclipse-m2e-plexus - M2E Plexus connector
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058897 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058897] Review Request: eclipse-m2e-plexus - M2E Plexus connector
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058897 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
