[Bug 1060651] New: Review Request: rubygem-rspec-support - Common functionality to Rspec series
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060651 Bug ID: 1060651 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rspec-support - Common functionality to Rspec series Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mtas...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/gem-related/rubygem-rspec-support.spec SRPM URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/gem-related/rubygem-rspec-support-3.0.0-0.1.beta1.fc.src.rpm Description: `RSpec::Support` provides common functionality to `RSpec::Core`, `RSpec::Expectations` and `RSpec::Mocks`. It is considered suitable for internal use only at this time. Fedora Account System Username: mtasaka This package is required for Rspec 3 series -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 839260] Review Request: Agda-stdlib - Agda standard library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839260 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- (In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #5) Should build on F19 and F20. (Sorry this remark was vague: I meant that Agda-2.3.2 is there now.) Exclude ARM since no Agda currently on ARM: Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/Agda-stdlib/Agda-stdlib.spec SRPM: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/Agda-stdlib/Agda-stdlib-0.7-2.fc20.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6483015 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1055020] Review Request:openpgpkey-milter - OPENPGPKEY basd automatic encryption of emails using the milter API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055020 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- openpgpkey-milter-0.3-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openpgpkey-milter-0.3-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047787] Review Request: rubygem-loofah - Manipulate and transform HTML/XML documents and fragments
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047787 Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktdre...@ktdreyer.com Flags||needinfo?(ktdreyer@ktdreyer ||.com) --- Comment #3 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org --- Ken, would you import this into Fedora git? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1055020] Review Request:openpgpkey-milter - OPENPGPKEY basd automatic encryption of emails using the milter API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055020 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- openpgpkey-milter-0.3-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openpgpkey-milter-0.3-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1046813] Review Request: rubygem-cocaine - A small library for doing (command) lines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046813 Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-02-03 04:18:55 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org --- Closing as this package is already imported. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060465] Review Request: perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX - Create a new file in the Excel 2007+ XLSX format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060465 --- Comment #1 from David Dick dd...@cpan.org --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6483490 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1036396] Review Request: python-social-auth - Social auth made simple
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036396 --- Comment #18 from Jakub Dorňák jdor...@redhat.com --- Well, it now builds for epel7, but there are some broken dependences: On x86_64: python-social-auth-0.1.19-1.el7.noarch requires python-requests-oauthlib python-social-auth-0.1.19-1.el7.noarch requires python-oauthlib On ppc64: python-social-auth-0.1.19-1.el7.noarch requires python-requests-oauthlib python-social-auth-0.1.19-1.el7.noarch requires python-requests python-social-auth-0.1.19-1.el7.noarch requires python-oauthlib -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1009842] Rename Request: ghc-highlighting-kate - Sourcecode syntax highlighting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009842 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- Built for Rawhide. I will probably backport it later to F20, etc. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060465] Review Request: perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX - Create a new file in the Excel 2007+ XLSX format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060465 David Dick dd...@cpan.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730570] Review Request: python-requests - Python HTTP library for Humans
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730570 Jakub Dorňák jdor...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jdor...@redhat.com Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #22 from Jakub Dorňák jdor...@redhat.com --- Package Change Request == Package Name: python-requests New Branches: epel7 Owners: jdornak -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1036396] Review Request: python-social-auth - Social auth made simple
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036396 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Dorňák jdor...@redhat.com --- There are epel7 branches of python-oauthlib and python-requests-oauthlib. I have just requested epel7 branch of python-requests. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 722653] Review Request: perl-Modern-Perl - enable all of the features of Modern Perl with one command
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722653 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 722653] Review Request: perl-Modern-Perl - enable all of the features of Modern Perl with one command
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722653 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730570] Review Request: python-requests - Python HTTP library for Humans
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730570 --- Comment #23 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Any comment from the Fedora maintainers? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 984605] Review Request: nwchem - Delivering High-Performance Computational Chemistry
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984605 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 984605] Review Request: nwchem - Delivering High-Performance Computational Chemistry
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984605 --- Comment #29 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730570] Review Request: python-requests - Python HTTP library for Humans
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730570 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005782] Review Request: uimaj - Apache UIMA is an implementation of the OASIS-UIMA specifications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782 --- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1029227] Review Request: cvc4 - Automatic theorem prover for SMT problems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029227 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1029227] Review Request: cvc4 - Automatic theorem prover for SMT problems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029227 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005782] Review Request: uimaj - Apache UIMA is an implementation of the OASIS-UIMA specifications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1035543] Review Request: ghc-async - Asynchronous IO operations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035543 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1035543] Review Request: ghc-async - Asynchronous IO operations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035543 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730697] Review Request: python26-h5py - Python interface to the HDF5 library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730697 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC|mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se | Assignee|mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se |nob...@fedoraproject.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060022] Review Request: perl-String-Print - Alternative for Perl printf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060022 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060022] Review Request: perl-String-Print - Alternative for Perl printf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060022 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com --- No issues whatsoever, approving. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060044] Review Request: perl-Log-Report-Optional - Base class for large Log::Report and simple Log::Report::Minimal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060044 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058038] Review Request: systeminfo - simple utility for viewing HW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058038 --- Comment #14 from Pavol Ipoth pavol.ip...@gmail.com --- Ok i find a thing with that tabs and spaces, i had to reopen all files, reopening project wasn't enough... I added that setup.py to install and build section, removed that hash-bangs, truncated description, fixed %files, added man page I probably mixed you up, i don't want to setup.py to include systeminfo.py and settings, because those are app specific data -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005792] Review Request: uima-addons - Apache UIMA Addons components
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005792
--- Comment #7 from Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- There are many JCasGen generated sourecs. We already have
jcasgen-maven-plugin, therefore the files should be generated/updated during
build
- %description: s/provide/provides/
- README.txt is about Tika that upstream bundles, but it is irrelevant to this
package - don't install it
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
Apache (v2.0), Unknown or generated, *No copyright* Apache (v2.0).
48 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/msimacek/1005792-uima-addons/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Java:
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
[x]: Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
Note: Maven packages do not need to (Build)Require jpackage-utils. It is
pulled in by maven-local
[x]: Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[x]: Javadoc subpackages should not have Requires: jpackage-utils
[x]: Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink)
Maven:
[x]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even
when building with ant
[x]: POM files have correct Maven mapping
[x]: Maven packages should use new style packaging
[x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used
[x]: Packages DO NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-
utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
[x]: Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x]: Packages use %{_mavenpomdir} instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
[Bug 1060044] Review Request: perl-Log-Report-Optional - Base class for large Log::Report and simple Log::Report::Minimal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060044 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com --- The package is alright, approving. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857992] Review Request: JQuery - Fast, concise library that simplifies how you use JavaScript
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857992 Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vondr...@redhat.com --- Comment #15 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com --- Can't see sizzle between dependencies you list ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060022] Review Request: perl-String-Print - Alternative for Perl printf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060022 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-String-Print Short Description: Alternative for Perl printf Owners: ppisar jplesnik psabata Branches: InitialCC: perl-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060044] Review Request: perl-Log-Report-Optional - Base class for large Log::Report and simple Log::Report::Minimal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060044 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Log-Report-Optional Short Description: Base class for large Log::Report and simple Log::Report::Minimal Owners: ppisar jplesnik psabata Branches: InitialCC: perl-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058445] Review Request: python-taskflow - Taskflow structured state management library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058445 --- Comment #8 from Pádraig Brady pbr...@redhat.com --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pbrady/python-taskflow.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pbrady/python-taskflow-0.1.2-3.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060022] Review Request: perl-String-Print - Alternative for Perl printf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060022 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060022] Review Request: perl-String-Print - Alternative for Perl printf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060022 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060044] Review Request: perl-Log-Report-Optional - Base class for large Log::Report and simple Log::Report::Minimal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060044 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060044] Review Request: perl-Log-Report-Optional - Base class for large Log::Report and simple Log::Report::Minimal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060044 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058038] Review Request: systeminfo - simple utility for viewing HW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058038 --- Comment #15 from Pavol Ipoth pavol.ip...@gmail.com --- I also tried to build for EPEL5 through koji but it doesn't work and i don't know why Build for EPEL6 was successful -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058623] Review Request: perl-WebService-Linode - Perl Interface to the Linode.com API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058623 --- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com --- FIX: Missing the perl(Data::Dumper) BR, from lib/WebService/Linode/Base.pm:10 and t/01-domains.t:4 FIX: Remove the JSON and LWP::UserAgent from the explicit runtime deps. Those will be picked up automatically. TODO: Add `perl' to your BRs as it's called in the SPEC. TODO: Package `examples' in the %doc. NOTE: I think it'd be better to require perl(LWP::Protocol::https) instead of the perl(Mozilla::CA) and perl(Crypt::SSLeay) combo, however I know you're just following the upstream's recommendation. Perhaps try if the module works with LWP::Protocol::https only and suggest the switch to upstream if you feel like it? In my opinion it'd be a bit cleaner. Anyhow, this really isn't important for the review and I haven't checked whether this makes any sense either :) Just a thought. Fix the points marked as FIX and I'll approve the package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060044] Review Request: perl-Log-Report-Optional - Base class for large Log::Report and simple Log::Report::Minimal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060044 Bug 1060044 depends on bug 1060022, which changed state. Bug 1060022 Summary: Review Request: perl-String-Print - Alternative for Perl printf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060022 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060022] Review Request: perl-String-Print - Alternative for Perl printf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060022 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-String-Print-0.13-1.fc ||21 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-02-03 10:30:57 --- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- Thank you for the review and the repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1051771] Review Request: vdr-tvguide - a highly customizable 2D EPG viewer plugin for the VDR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051771
--- Comment #14 from Mohamed El Morabity pikachu.2...@gmail.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
GPL (v2 or later), Unknown or generated. 69 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/mohamed/reviews/1051771
-vdr-tvguide/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/share/locale/sk_SK,
/usr/share/locale/sk_SK/LC_MESSAGES
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: No %config files under /usr.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[!]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[!]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[!]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
Note: Modifying the Makefile may be necessary to achieve this goal
[x]: Sources can be
[Bug 1055730] Review Request: vdr-iptv - multicast IPTV transport stream plugin for VDR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055730
--- Comment #1 from Mohamed El Morabity pikachu.2...@gmail.com ---
Some comments:
- same issue than in vdr-tvguide review: since the package is written in C++,
and since the CXXFLAGS variable is handled by the plugin Makefile, you must
also set CXXFLAGS when calling make, to keep consistency on build flags:
make CFLAGS=%{optflags} CXXFLAGS=%{optflags} ...
You should even add -fPIC to both CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS to handle build issues
on x86_64 platforms.
- the scripts deployed in %{vdr_configdir}/plugins/iptv/ can be called from
channels.conf when an IPTV channel is selected from VDR. Most of them are demo
scripts; they must be modified/copied to fit users' needs. I wonder if it's
worth marking them as %config(noreplace) so these scripts wouldn't be
overwritten by further updates if they were modified. Notice it's not a must,
only a suggestion.
- among those scripts, vlc2iptv contains a bad path to channels.conf. This
script should probably be modified to refer to the right path to channels.conf,
as defined by Fedora:
%prep
%setup -q -n %{vdr_plugin}-%{version}
# Fix paths in plugin scripts
sed -i s|^CHANNELS_CONF=.*|CHANNELS_CONF=%{vdr_configdir}/channels.conf|; \
s|^CHANNEL_SETTINGS_DIR=.*/iptv|CHANNEL_SETTINGS_DIR=%{vdr_configdir}/plugins/%{vdr_plugin}|
\
iptv/vlc2iptv
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1051771] Review Request: vdr-tvguide - a highly customizable 2D EPG viewer plugin for the VDR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051771 --- Comment #15 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de --- Spec URL: http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/vdr-tvguide.spec SRPM URL: http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/vdr-tvguide-1.2.0-2.fc20.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Feb 03 2014 Martin Gansser marti...@fedoraproject.org - 1.2.0-2 - removed BuildRequires on freetype-devel -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060044] Review Request: perl-Log-Report-Optional - Base class for large Log::Report and simple Log::Report::Minimal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060044 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Log-Report-Optional-1. ||00-1.fc21 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-02-03 11:09:15 --- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- Thank you for the review and the repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1055730] Review Request: vdr-iptv - multicast IPTV transport stream plugin for VDR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055730 --- Comment #2 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de --- Spec URL: http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/vdr-iptv.spec SRPM URL: http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/vdr-iptv-2.0.2-3.fc20.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Feb 03 2014 Martin Gansser marti...@fedoraproject.org - 2.0.2-3 - added compiler flags in build section - fixed paths in plugin scripts for channels.conf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1051771] Review Request: vdr-tvguide - a highly customizable 2D EPG viewer plugin for the VDR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051771 Mohamed El Morabity pikachu.2...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Mohamed El Morabity pikachu.2...@gmail.com --- This package is APPROVED. Thanks for your work and your patience ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060804] New: Review Request: flamp - Amateur Multicast Protocol - file transfer program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060804 Bug ID: 1060804 Summary: Review Request: flamp - Amateur Multicast Protocol - file transfer program Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: hobbes1...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org//flamp.spec SRPM URL: http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org//flamp-2.1.02-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: Flamp is a program for AMP or Amateur Multicast Protocol. An flamp session will transmit one or more files with one or more iterations of the transmission. Each file is broken into blocks, each of which has a check sum. The receiving station saves the blocks that pass check sum. Successive transmissions will fill in the missing blocks provided that the new blocks pass the check sum. After the transmission sequence, the entire file is assembled and may be saved. “Fills” may be provided by retransmitting the entire file or by the sending station only sending the missing blocks. Start by downloading the current version of flamp from http://www.w1hkj.com/download.html. Install the software as you would any of the NBEMS applications. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060804] Review Request: flamp - Amateur Multicast Protocol - file transfer program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060804 --- Comment #1 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com --- This package built on koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6485752 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1051771] Review Request: vdr-tvguide - a highly customizable 2D EPG viewer plugin for the VDR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051771 --- Comment #17 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de --- Thanks for the professional review. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: vdr-tvguide Short Description: A highly customizable 2D EPG viewer plugin for the VDR Owners: martinkg Branches: f20 f21 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1051771] Review Request: vdr-tvguide - a highly customizable 2D EPG viewer plugin for the VDR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051771 MartinKG mgans...@alice.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005792] Review Request: uima-addons - Apache UIMA Addons components
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005792 --- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- (In reply to Michael Simacek from comment #7) Issues: === - There are many generated sourecs. We already have jcasgen-maven-plugin, therefore the files should be generated/updated during build JCasGen resources are unavailables e.g. plugin groupIdorg.apache.uima/groupId artifactIdjcasgen-maven-plugin/artifactId version2.5.0/version configuration typeSystemIncludes typeSystemIncludesrc/main/resources/TypeSystem.xml/typeSystemInclude /typeSystemIncludes /configuration executions execution goals goalgenerate/goal /goals /execution /executions /plugin - %description: s/provide/provides/ Done - README.txt is about Tika that upstream bundles, but it is irrelevant to this package - don't install it Done Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/uima-addons.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/uima-addons-2.3.1-1.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1055730] Review Request: vdr-iptv - multicast IPTV transport stream plugin for VDR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055730 Mohamed El Morabity pikachu.2...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Mohamed El Morabity pikachu.2...@gmail.com --- The plugin doesn't rely on gettext libraries to handle locales. Only xgettext and msgmerge executables (from gettext package) are called by Makefile to build .mo files. As a result, replacing gettext-devel by gettext in BuildRequires may be enough to handle locales at compilation. I don't think a sysconfig file for iptv is really useful: - the plugin documentation doesn't mention any launch options to set up the plugin at VDR launch; - I didn't find any reference to launch options in the source code. So you can probably drop the iptv.conf file installation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060817] New: Review Request: fllog - Amateur Radio Log Program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060817 Bug ID: 1060817 Summary: Review Request: fllog - Amateur Radio Log Program Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: hobbes1...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org//fllog.spec SRPM URL: http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org//fllog-1.1.7-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: Fllog is a transceiver control program for Amateur Radio use. It does not use any 3rd party transceiver control libraries. It is a c++ pro- gram that encapsulates each transceiver in it's own class. Where ever possible the transceiver class(s) use polymorphism to reuse code that is portable across a series of transceivers. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060818] New: Review Request: fllog - Amateur Radio Log Program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060818 Bug ID: 1060818 Summary: Review Request: fllog - Amateur Radio Log Program Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: hobbes1...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org//fllog.spec SRPM URL: http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org//fllog-1.1.7-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: Fllog is a transceiver control program for Amateur Radio use. It does not use any 3rd party transceiver control libraries. It is a c++ pro- gram that encapsulates each transceiver in it's own class. Where ever possible the transceiver class(s) use polymorphism to reuse code that is portable across a series of transceivers. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060817] Review Request: fllog - Amateur Radio Log Program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060817 --- Comment #1 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com --- *** Bug 1060818 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060818] Review Request: fllog - Amateur Radio Log Program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060818 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed||2014-02-03 11:59:39 --- Comment #1 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com --- Problem with fedora-create-review caused a dupe. Closing. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1060817 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060817] Review Request: fllog - Amateur Radio Log Program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060817 --- Comment #2 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com --- koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6485927 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1057849] Review Request: coreboot-utils - Various utilities from coreboot project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057849 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(cicku...@gmail.co ||m) --- Comment #8 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk --- Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060817] Review Request: fllog - Amateur Radio Log Program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060817 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1055730] Review Request: vdr-iptv - multicast IPTV transport stream plugin for VDR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055730 --- Comment #4 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de --- Spec URL: http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/vdr-iptv.spec SRPM URL: http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/vdr-iptv-2.0.2-4.fc20.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Feb 03 2014 Martin Gansser marti...@fedoraproject.org - 2.0.2-4 - replaced gettext-devel by gettext in BuildRequires - dropped iptv.conf file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060804] Review Request: flamp - Amateur Multicast Protocol - file transfer program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060804 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1051771] Review Request: vdr-tvguide - a highly customizable 2D EPG viewer plugin for the VDR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051771 --- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1051771] Review Request: vdr-tvguide - a highly customizable 2D EPG viewer plugin for the VDR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051771 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 866265] Review Request: opentrep - C++ API for parsing travel-focused requests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866265 --- Comment #20 from Denis Arnaud denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org --- Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/opentrep/opentrep.spec SRPM URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/opentrep/opentrep-0.6.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Successful Koji build (for all the architectures): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6486024 Now everything appears to work as expected*. *: Note that the Python script has got a manual page, but can only be executed from the Python site-packages directory. I do not know how to solve that issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060841] Review Request: flrig - Transceiver control program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060841 --- Comment #1 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com --- This package built on koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6486102 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060841] New: Review Request: flrig - Transceiver control program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060841 Bug ID: 1060841 Summary: Review Request: flrig - Transceiver control program Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: hobbes1...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org//flrig.spec SRPM URL: http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org//flrig-1.3.15-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: Flrig is a transceiver control program designed to be used either stand alone or as an adjunct to fldigi. The supported transceivers all have some degree of CAT. The flrig user interface changes to accommodate the degree of CAT support available for the transceiver in use. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058445] Review Request: python-taskflow - Taskflow structured state management library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058445 Alan Pevec ape...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@draigbrady.com Flags||needinfo?(p...@draigbrady.com) --- Comment #9 from Alan Pevec ape...@redhat.com --- Sorry Pádraig, fedora-review didn't show me this in the previous run, dunno why. Should be an easy fix: Issues: === - Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 1423360 bytes in 82 files. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#PackageDocumentation -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1051771] Review Request: vdr-tvguide - a highly customizable 2D EPG viewer plugin for the VDR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051771 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1051771] Review Request: vdr-tvguide - a highly customizable 2D EPG viewer plugin for the VDR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051771 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- vdr-tvguide-1.2.0-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vdr-tvguide-1.2.0-2.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1045556] Review Request: hbase - The Apache Hadoop database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045556 Bug 1045556 depends on bug 1049905, which changed state. Bug 1049905 Summary: hadoop: FTBFS in rawhide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049905 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060804] Review Request: flamp - Amateur Multicast Protocol - file transfer program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060804 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060817] Review Request: fllog - Amateur Radio Log Program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060817 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1051771] Review Request: vdr-tvguide - a highly customizable 2D EPG viewer plugin for the VDR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051771 MartinKG mgans...@alice.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-02-03 13:27:51 --- Comment #20 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de --- vdr-tvguide has been built successfully on fc20 and fc21. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060852] Review Request: flnet - Amateur Radio Net Control Station
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852 --- Comment #1 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com --- This package built on koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6487097 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060852] New: Review Request: flnet - Amateur Radio Net Control Station
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852 Bug ID: 1060852 Summary: Review Request: flnet - Amateur Radio Net Control Station Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: hobbes1...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org//flnet.spec SRPM URL: http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org//flnet-7.0.1-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: Net provides the Amateur Radio Net Control Station operator with a real time tool to assist him or her in managing the net activities. A single screen with multiple windows is used to allow rapid entry, search, pick and display of all stations calling in to the net. All operations on the main screen are accomplished with keyboard entries only. No mouse action is required to perform the net control functions. Experience has shown that most net control operators prefer this method of operation to improve the speed of entry and selection. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1016089] Review Request: aprsdigi - AX.25 Automatic Position Reporting System aprsdigi and aprsmon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016089 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- aprsdigi-3.5.1-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/aprsdigi-3.5.1-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1016089] Review Request: aprsdigi - AX.25 Automatic Position Reporting System aprsdigi and aprsmon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016089 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- aprsdigi-3.5.1-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/aprsdigi-3.5.1-2.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1016089] Review Request: aprsdigi - AX.25 Automatic Position Reporting System aprsdigi and aprsmon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016089 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005782] Review Request: uimaj - Apache UIMA is an implementation of the OASIS-UIMA specifications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005782] Review Request: uimaj - Apache UIMA is an implementation of the OASIS-UIMA specifications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- uimaj-2.5.0-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/uimaj-2.5.0-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1029227] Review Request: cvc4 - Automatic theorem prover for SMT problems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029227 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- cvc4-1.3-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cvc4-1.3-2.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1029227] Review Request: cvc4 - Automatic theorem prover for SMT problems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029227 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1055020] Review Request:openpgpkey-milter - OPENPGPKEY basd automatic encryption of emails using the milter API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055020 Paul Wouters pwout...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |RELEASE_PENDING -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 952989] Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-faience - The Faience gnome-shell theme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952989 --- Comment #6 from Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com --- Gnome 3.10 compatibility Spec: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/gnome-shell-theme-faience.spec SRPM: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/gnome-shell-theme-faience-0.5.4-0.3.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 490380] Review Request: qt-creator - Lightweight and cross-platform IDE for Qt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490380 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.1.0-2.fc11|qt-creator-1.3.1-4.el6 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- qt-creator-1.3.1-4.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048621] Review Request: zabbix22 - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048621 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||zabbix22-2.2.1-5.el6 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-02-03 15:49:41 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- zabbix22-2.2.1-5.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060906] New: Review Request: nss_wrapper - A wrapper for uiser, group and hosts NSS API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060906 Bug ID: 1060906 Summary: Review Request: nss_wrapper - A wrapper for uiser, group and hosts NSS API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: a...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/nss_wrapper/nss_wrapper.spec SRPM URL: http://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/nss_wrapper/nss_wrapper-1.0.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: There are projects which provide daemons needing to be able to create, modify and delete unix users. Or just switch user ids to interact with the system e.g. a user space file server. To be able to test that you need the privilege to modify the passwd and groups file. With nss_wrapper it is possible to define your own passwd and groups file which will be used by software to act correctly while under test. Fedora Account System Username: asn NOTE: This is a special library you load with LD_PRELOAD. There is no header file and it will not be linked against any library! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060909] New: Review Request: socket_wrapper - A library passing all socket communications trough unix sockets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060909 Bug ID: 1060909 Summary: Review Request: socket_wrapper - A library passing all socket communications trough unix sockets Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: a...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/socket_wrapper/socket_wrapper.spec SRPM URL: http://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/socket_wrapper/socket_wrapper-1.0.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: socket_wrapper aims to help client/server software development teams willing to gain full functional test coverage. It makes possible to run several instances of the full software stack on the same machine and perform locally functional testing of complex network configurations. Fedora Account System Username: asn NOTE: This is a special library you load with LD_PRELOAD. There is no header file and it will not be linked against any library! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060910] New: Review Request: uid_wrapper - A wrapper for privilege seperation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060910 Bug ID: 1060910 Summary: Review Request: uid_wrapper - A wrapper for privilege seperation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: a...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/uid_wrapper/uid_wrapper.spec SRPM URL: http://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/uid_wrapper/uid_wrapper-1.0.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: Some projects like a file server need privilege separation to be able to switch to the connnection user and do file operations. uid_wrapper convincingly lies to the application letting it believe it is operating as root and even switching betwen uids and gids as needed. Fedora Account System Username: asn NOTE: This is a special library you load with LD_PRELOAD. There is no header file and it will not be linked against any library! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058812] Review Request: mod_lookup_identity - Apache module to retrieve additional information about the authenticated user.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058812 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Hrozek jhro...@redhat.com --- The spec file looks good to me, file ownership is sane, license matches the upstream, the package passed my sanity test. The tarball matches: * rpm: 16c9377e839a959172a2dfe7d32de5bf * upstream [*]: 16c9377e839a959172a2dfe7d32de5bf The package builds fine in Mock: * http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6487502 Full rpmlint output: mod_lookup_identity.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lookup - lockup, hookup, look up mod_lookup_identity-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) lookup - lockup, hookup, look up mod_lookup_identity-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lookup - lockup, hookup, look up This package is APPROVED. [*] You should fix two bugs on your website - there is no link to 0.8.3 on http://www.adelton.com/apache/mod_lookup_identity/ - following the link to mod_lookup_identity 0.8.2 takes me to http://www.adelton.com/apache/mod_authnz_pam/; -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058812] Review Request: mod_lookup_identity - Apache module to retrieve additional information about the authenticated user.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058812 Jakub Hrozek jhro...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060915] New: Review Request: aether-connector-okhttp - OkHttp Aether Connector
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060915 Bug ID: 1060915 Summary: Review Request: aether-connector-okhttp - OkHttp Aether Connector Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ger...@ryan.lt QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://galileo.fedorapeople.org/aether-connector-okhttp/0.0.10-0.1/aether-connector-okhttp.spec SRPM URL: http://galileo.fedorapeople.org/aether-connector-okhttp/0.0.10-0.1/aether-connector-okhttp-0.0.10-0.1.fc21.src.rpm Description: A repository connector implementation based on Square's OkHttp. Fedora Account System Username: galileo Unreleased version packaged because we have okhttp-1.2.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 949317] Review Request: rubygem-serialport - Ruby library that provide class for RS232 serail port
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949317 --- Comment #9 from Alejandro_Perez alejandro.perez.tor...@gmail.com --- Updated to the new version of gem serialport 1.3.0 http://aeperezt.fedorapeople.org/rpmdev/rubygem-serialport.spec http://aeperezt.fedorapeople.org/rpmdev/rubygem-serialport-1.3.0-5.fc20.src.rpm Koji build here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6487513 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060920] New: Review Request: openni2 - OpenNI libraries for 3D-sensing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060920 Bug ID: 1060920 Summary: Review Request: openni2 - OpenNI libraries for 3D-sensing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: log...@cottsay.net QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://csc.mcs.sdsmt.edu/openni2/openni2.spec SRPM URL: http://csc.mcs.sdsmt.edu/openni2/openni2-2.2.0.33-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: Driver and libraries for OpenNI: The standard framework for 3D sensing Fedora Account System Username: cottsay Koji scratch builds: F19: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6487506 F20: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6487509 rpmlint output: openni2.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US middleware - middle ware, middle-ware, middleweight openni2.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lifecycle - life cycle, life-cycle, Wycliffe openni2-doc.noarch: W: no-documentation openni2-java.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib openni2-java.noarch: W: no-documentation openni2.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US middleware - middle ware, middle-ware, middleweight openni2.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lifecycle - life cycle, life-cycle, Wycliffe openni2.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libOpenNI2.so openni2.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libOpenNI2.jni.so openni2.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary NiViewer openni2.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary PSLinkConsole openni2.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary PS1080Console openni2-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation openni2-examples.x86_64: W: no-documentation openni2-examples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary MWClosestPointApp openni2-examples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary SimpleViewer openni2-examples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary MultiDepthViewer openni2-examples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ClosestPointViewer openni2-examples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary MultipleStreamRead openni2-examples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary EventBasedRead openni2-examples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary SimpleRead openni2-java.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib openni2-java.x86_64: W: no-documentation 8 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 23 warnings. Notes: * This is the next generation of the openni drivers and is different from the openni package currently in Fedora. * This package cannot be built on ppc, but does build on Arm. * Most of the ThirdParty bundled software is removed before building, and Fedora versions are used. However, XnLib and glh are not Fedora packages, and are left untouched. The same is true in the openni package that is currently in Fedora. This is my first Fedora package, and I will be needing a sponsor. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060920] Review Request: openni2 - OpenNI libraries for 3D-sensing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060920 Scott K Logan log...@cottsay.net changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058038] Review Request: systeminfo - simple utility for viewing HW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058038 --- Comment #16 from Pavol Ipoth pavol.ip...@gmail.com --- I got it, i rebuilded src.rpm on 5.8 and now build works in koji :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060924] New: Review Request: rubygem-unicode - Unicode normalization library for Ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060924 Bug ID: 1060924 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-unicode - Unicode normalization library for Ruby Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dcall...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~dcallagh/rubygem-unicode/rubygem-unicode.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~dcallagh/rubygem-unicode/rubygem-unicode-0.4.4-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: Unicode normalization library for Ruby. Fedora Account System Username: dcallagh -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
