[Bug 1006104] Review Request: gqrx - Software defined radio receiver powered by GNU Radio and Qt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006104 Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ville.sky...@iki.fi Blocks||496968 (DebugInfo) --- Comment #31 from Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi --- (In reply to Eric Christensen from comment #23) [?]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. Why not evaluated? In this case, -debuginfo is not useful, quite probably because of this: $ curl -s http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/gqrx/2.2.0/4.fc21/data/logs/x86_64/build.log | grep -wF strip | head -n 1 strip /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/gqrx-2.2.0-4.fc21.x86_64/usr/bin/gqrx Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496968 [Bug 496968] Tracking bug for packages with debuginfo problems -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060245] Review Request: nodejs-simple-assert - Vanilla assertions for Node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060245 Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jamieli...@fedoraproject.or ||g Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jamieli...@fedoraproject.or ||g -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060245] Review Request: nodejs-simple-assert - Vanilla assertions for Node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060245
--- Comment #1 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses
found. Please check the source files for licenses manually.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
Note: Package contains tarball without URL, check comments
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL).
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
= EXTRA items =
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
Rpmlint
---
Checking: nodejs-simple-assert-1.0.0-1.fc21.noarch.rpm
[Bug 1060245] Review Request: nodejs-simple-assert - Vanilla assertions for Node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060245 Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org --- Looks good. Package approved! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060250] Review Request: nodejs-type-detect - Improved typeof detection for Node.js and the browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060250 Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jamieli...@fedoraproject.or ||g Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jamieli...@fedoraproject.or ||g Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060245] Review Request: nodejs-simple-assert - Vanilla assertions for Node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060245 --- Comment #3 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org --- We use it to avoid circular dependencies when testing Chai's dependencies. You might consider amending the above sentence as the we is ambiguous. Maybe something like This software is used to avoid ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060254] Review Request: nodejs-deep-eql - Improved deep equality testing for Node.js and the browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060254 Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jamieli...@fedoraproject.or ||g Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jamieli...@fedoraproject.or ||g Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060250] Review Request: nodejs-type-detect - Improved typeof detection for Node.js and the browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060250 Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org --- Looks good. Package approved! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069124] New: Review Request: python-netlib - Collection of network utility classes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069124 Bug ID: 1069124 Summary: Review Request: python-netlib - Collection of network utility classes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dh...@openwall.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://bitbucket.org/dhiru/packages/raw/master/python-netlib/python-netlib.spec SRPM URL: https://bitbucket.org/dhiru/packages/raw/master/python-netlib/python-netlib-0.10-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: Netlib is a collection of network utility classes, used by the pathod and mitmproxy projects. It differs from other projects in some fundamental respects, because both pathod and mitmproxy often need to violate standards. This means that protocols are implemented as small, well-contained and flexible functions, and are designed to allow misbehaviour when needed. https://github.com/mitmproxy/netlib Fedora Account System Username: halfie -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060250] Review Request: nodejs-type-detect - Improved typeof detection for Node.js and the browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060250
--- Comment #1 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses
found. Please check the source files for licenses manually.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
Note: Package contains tarball without URL, check comments
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL).
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
= EXTRA items =
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
Rpmlint
---
Checking: nodejs-type-detect-0.1.2-1.fc21.noarch.rpm
[Bug 1060254] Review Request: nodejs-deep-eql - Improved deep equality testing for Node.js and the browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060254
--- Comment #1 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses
found. Please check the source files for licenses manually.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
Note: Package contains tarball without URL, check comments
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL).
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
= EXTRA items =
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
Rpmlint
---
Checking: nodejs-deep-eql-0.1.3-1.fc21.noarch.rpm
[Bug 1060254] Review Request: nodejs-deep-eql - Improved deep equality testing for Node.js and the browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060254 Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org --- Looks good. Package approved! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060245] Review Request: nodejs-simple-assert - Vanilla assertions for Node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060245 Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: nodejs-simple-assert Short Description: Vanilla assertions for Node.js Owners: tomh jamielinux Branches: f19 f20 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060250] Review Request: nodejs-type-detect - Improved typeof detection for Node.js and the browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060250 Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: nodejs-type-detect Short Description: Improved typeof detection for Node.js and the browser Owners: tomh jamielinux Branches: f19 f20 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060254] Review Request: nodejs-deep-eql - Improved deep equality testing for Node.js and the browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060254 Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: nodejs-deep-eql Short Description: Improved deep equality testing for Node.js and the browser Owners: tomh jamielinux Branches: f19 f20 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069139] New: Review Request: gerritlib -- Client library for accessing Gerrit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069139 Bug ID: 1069139 Summary: Review Request: gerritlib -- Client library for accessing Gerrit Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: kcham...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org SPEC: http://kashyapc.fedorapeople.org/spec-files/gerritlib.spec SRPM: http://kashyapc.fedorapeople.org/srpms/gerritlib-0.3.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: A Python library for interacting with Gerrit Fedora Account System Username: kashyapc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069139] Review Request: gerritlib -- Client library for accessing Gerrit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069139 --- Comment #1 from Kashyap Chamarthy kcham...@redhat.com --- Successful Koji scratch build: $ koji build --scratch rawhide ../SRPMS/gerritlib-0.3.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Uploading srpm: ../SRPMS/gerritlib-0.3.0-1.fc20.src.rpm [] 100% 00:00:01 14.66 KiB 8.31 KiB/sec Created task: 6564128 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6564128 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 6564128 build (rawhide, gerritlib-0.3.0-1.fc20.src.rpm): open (buildvm-12.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 6564129 buildArch (gerritlib-0.3.0-1.fc20.src.rpm, armv7hl): open (arm02-builder23.arm.fedoraproject.org) 6564131 buildArch (gerritlib-0.3.0-1.fc20.src.rpm, i686): open (buildvm-06.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 6564130 buildArch (gerritlib-0.3.0-1.fc20.src.rpm, x86_64): open (buildvm-17.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 6564130 buildArch (gerritlib-0.3.0-1.fc20.src.rpm, x86_64): open (buildvm-17.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 3 open 1 done 0 failed 6564131 buildArch (gerritlib-0.3.0-1.fc20.src.rpm, i686): open (buildvm-06.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 2 open 2 done 0 failed 6564129 buildArch (gerritlib-0.3.0-1.fc20.src.rpm, armv7hl): open (arm02-builder23.arm.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 1 open 3 done 0 failed 6564128 build (rawhide, gerritlib-0.3.0-1.fc20.src.rpm): open (buildvm-12.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 0 open 4 done 0 failed 6564128 build (rawhide, gerritlib-0.3.0-1.fc20.src.rpm) completed successfully -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069139] Review Request: gerritlib -- Client library for accessing Gerrit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069139 --- Comment #2 from Kashyap Chamarthy kcham...@redhat.com --- [rpmlint from AUTOMATED REVIEW TOOL OUTPUT] $ fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --rpm-spec \ -n ../SRPMS/gerritlib-0.3.0-1.fc20.src.rpm [. . .] Rpmlint --- Checking: gerritlib-0.3.0-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm gerritlib-0.3.0-1.fc21.src.rpm gerritlib.x86_64: E: no-binary gerritlib.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gerritlib/LICENSE 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) # rpmlint gerritlib gerritlib.x86_64: E: no-binary gerritlib.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gerritlib/LICENSE 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' [. . .] -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069139] Review Request: gerritlib -- Client library for accessing Gerrit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069139 --- Comment #3 from Kashyap Chamarthy kcham...@redhat.com --- Created attachment 866926 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=866926action=edit fedora-review tool un-edited output -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069139] Review Request: gerritlib -- Client library for accessing Gerrit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069139 Kashyap Chamarthy kcham...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Kashyap Chamarthy kcham...@redhat.com --- Assigning to Parag as he kindly agreed, on IRC, to review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1068304] Review Request: perl-Digest-xxHash - xxHash Implementation For Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1068304 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ppi...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ppi...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 814458] Review Request: fparser - Function parser library for C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=814458 --- Comment #15 from Till Hofmann hofm...@kbsg.rwth-aachen.de --- It would be nice if somebody could pick this up and review the package. I've only updated the package to the current fparser version, if there is anything else to do let me know. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1066027] Review Request: csdiff - Non-interactive tools for processing code scan results in plain-text
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066027 --- Comment #7 from Kamil Dudka kdu...@redhat.com --- Thanks for the review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1055395] Review Request: ocaml-xmlm - A streaming XML codec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055395 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||ocaml-xmlm-1.2.0-3.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-02-24 07:27:15 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ocaml-xmlm-1.2.0-3.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1055398] Review Request: 0install - A decentralized cross-distribution software installation system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055398 Bug 1055398 depends on bug 1055395, which changed state. Bug 1055395 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-xmlm - A streaming XML codec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055395 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1004565] Review Request: eureka - A cross-platform map editor for the classic DOOM games
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004565 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- eureka-1.00-3.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1004565] Review Request: eureka - A cross-platform map editor for the classic DOOM games
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004565 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||eureka-1.00-3.fc19 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-02-24 07:27:50 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- eureka-1.00-3.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060465] Review Request: perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX - Create a new file in the Excel 2007+ XLSX format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060465 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX-0.76 ||-1.fc19 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed|2014-02-12 05:11:02 |2014-02-24 07:29:55 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX-0.76-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1055395] Review Request: ocaml-xmlm - A streaming XML codec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055395 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ocaml-xmlm-1.2.0-3.fc20 |ocaml-xmlm-1.2.0-3.fc19 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ocaml-xmlm-1.2.0-3.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060465] Review Request: perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX - Create a new file in the Excel 2007+ XLSX format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060465 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX-0.76 |perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX-0.76 |-1.fc19 |-1.fc20 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX-0.76-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1061902] Review Request: qepcad-B - Quantifier elimination tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061902 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||qepcad-B-1.69-3.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-02-24 07:31:34 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- qepcad-B-1.69-3.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 814458] Review Request: fparser - Function parser library for C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=814458 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(richmattes@gmail. ||com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1066027] Review Request: csdiff - Non-interactive tools for processing code scan results in plain-text
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066027 Kamil Dudka kdu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Kamil Dudka kdu...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: csdiff Short Description: Non-interactive tools for processing code scan results in plain-text Owners: kdudka Branches: f19 f20 el6 epel7 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1066559] Review Request: mingw-id3lib - Library for manipulating ID3v1 and ID3v2 tags
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066559 --- Comment #4 from David King amigad...@amigadave.com --- Thanks for the comments! I fixed 1, 2, 3, 4. Not sure about 5, as I do not really know the convention (looking at the example in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MinGW#Example_Specfile). I added your patch (slightly modified to use autoreconf rather than a bootstrap script), added the -no-undefined change to the existing id3lib-3.8.3-mingw.patch and updated the .spec and SRPM in place: Spec URL: http://amigadave.fedorapeople.org/mingw-id3lib.spec SRPM URL: http://amigadave.fedorapeople.org/mingw-id3lib-3.8.3-31.fc20.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6564355 I suppose it makes sense to get the autoreconf patch into the native package too? It saves a few hundred kB in the SRPM size. :-) I do not get the opportunity to use Windows much, but I will try with some non-ASCII characters with EasyTAG the next time I do some testing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1046959] Review Request: simple-tpm-pk11 - A simple tool for using the TPM chip to secure SSH keys
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046959 Bug 1046959 depends on bug 1045849, which changed state. Bug 1045849 Summary: do not create /run/lock when used with mock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045849 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1068644] Review Request: python-croniter - Iteration for datetime object with cron like format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1068644 --- Comment #2 from Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pbrady/python-croniter.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pbrady/python-croniter-0.3.4-2.fc20.src.rpm Description: Iteration for datetime object with cron like format Fedora Account System Username: pbrady -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1065641] Review Request: libhttpserver - Library embedding RESTful HTTP server functionality
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065641 --- Comment #4 from Šimon Lukašík sluka...@redhat.com --- ii. Why don't you configure directly but cd in build/? Because the configure.ac includes an assertion which disallows inplace builds. if test `cd $srcdir; /bin/pwd` = `/bin/pwd`; then AC_MSG_ERROR(you must configure in a separate build directory) fi I can either remove that assertion by patch or build outside of source tree. I felt like building outside was a better idea. Anyway, thanks for feedback. I have uploaded new package: * Mon Feb 24 2014 Šimon Lukašík sluka...@redhat.com - 0.7.0-3 - removed leading new line character - added libmicrohttpd-devel to BuildRequires of base package - removed libmicrohttpd from BuildRequires - added arch specification to the Requires of libmicrohttpd-devel - moved autoreconf to the build section - use configure macro - symlink configure script to allow build out of the source tree - introduced parallel build - removed static libraries from installation target - removed clean section - removed defattr specification http://isimluk.fedorapeople.org/libhttpserver/0.7.0-3/libhttpserver.spec http://isimluk.fedorapeople.org/libhttpserver/0.7.0-3/libhttpserver-0.7.0-3.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 459925] Review Request: libowfat - Reimplementation of libdjb
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459925 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 459925] Review Request: libowfat - Reimplementation of libdjb
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459925 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 529255] Review Request: i3lock - A slightly improved version of slock
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529255 --- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 529255] Review Request: i3lock - A slightly improved version of slock
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529255 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 529256] Review Request: i3status - Generates a status line for dzen2 or wmii
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529256 --- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 620042] Review Request: dvdbackup - Command line tool for ripping video DVDs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620042 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 529256] Review Request: i3status - Generates a status line for dzen2 or wmii
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529256 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 620042] Review Request: dvdbackup - Command line tool for ripping video DVDs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620042 --- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 738556] Review Request: gogoc - IPv6 TSP client for gogo6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738556 --- Comment #47 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 738556] Review Request: gogoc - IPv6 TSP client for gogo6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738556 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 822328] Review Request: libmediainfo - Supplies technical and tag information about a video or audio file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328 --- Comment #37 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 953384] Review Request: Review Request: unar - Multi-format extractor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953384 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 953384] Review Request: Review Request: unar - Multi-format extractor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953384 --- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 822328] Review Request: libmediainfo - Supplies technical and tag information about a video or audio file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 968607] Review Request: nodeunit - Easy asynchronous unit testing framework for Node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968607 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 968607] Review Request: nodeunit - Easy asynchronous unit testing framework for Node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968607 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1068304] Review Request: perl-Digest-xxHash - xxHash Implementation For Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1068304 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- URL and Source0 are usable. Ok. Sources are original (SHA-256: 74ef29441500494bc26a8a7a7fdbadb3ee38b0ff1fb76f64e743f6c1fcee867d). Summary verified from lib/Digest/xxHash.pm. Ok. Description verified from lib/Digest/xxHash.pm. Ok. TODO: Expand the `OO' abbreviation in the description. FIX: Unbundle the xxHash sources http://code.google.com/p/xxhash/source/browse/trunk, or acquire FPC exception. All tests pass. Ok. $ rpmlint perl-Digest-xxHash.spec ../SRPMS/perl-Digest-xxHash-1.02-1.fc21.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/perl-Digest-xxHash-* perl-Digest-xxHash.src: W: summary-not-capitalized C xxHash Implementation For Perl perl-Digest-xxHash.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized C xxHash Implementation For Perl 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. rpmlint is Ok. $ rpm -q -lv -p ../RPMS/x86_64/perl-Digest-xxHash-1.02-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Feb 24 13:54 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/Digest -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 3230 Feb 24 13:54 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/Digest/xxHash.pm drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Feb 24 13:54 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/Digest drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Feb 24 13:54 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/Digest/xxHash -rwxr-xr-x1 rootroot15368 Feb 24 13:54 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/Digest/xxHash/xxHash.so drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Feb 24 13:54 /usr/share/doc/perl-Digest-xxHash -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 289 Feb 24 13:54 /usr/share/doc/perl-Digest-xxHash/Changes -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1585 Feb 24 13:54 /usr/share/doc/perl-Digest-xxHash/LICENSE -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 2758 Feb 24 13:54 /usr/share/doc/perl-Digest-xxHash/README -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 20 Nov 25 18:30 /usr/share/doc/perl-Digest-xxHash/TODO -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 3097 Feb 24 13:54 /usr/share/man/man3/Digest::xxHash.3pm.gz File layout and permissions are Ok. $ rpm -q --requires -p ../RPMS/x86_64/perl-Digest-xxHash-1.02-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 libc.so.6()(64bit) 1 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.14)(64bit) 1 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) 1 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) 1 libperl.so.5.18()(64bit) 1 perl(base) 1 perl(Config) 1 perl(Exporter) 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.2) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(XSLoader) 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) = 5.2-1 1 rtld(GNU_HASH) Binary requires are Ok. $ rpm -q --provides -p ../RPMS/x86_64/perl-Digest-xxHash-1.02-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(Digest::xxHash) = 1.02 1 perl-Digest-xxHash = 1.02-1.fc21 1 perl-Digest-xxHash(x86-64) = 1.02-1.fc21 Binary provides are Ok. $ resolvedeps rawhide ../RPMS/x86_64/perl-Digest-xxHash-1.02-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm Binary dependencies resolvable. Ok. Package build in F21 (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6564412). Ok. Otherwise the package is in line with Fedora and Perl packaging guidelines. Please correct all `FIX' items, consider fixing `TODO' items, and provide new specfile. Resolution: Package NOT approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 973904] Review Request: libserf - High-Performance Asynchronous HTTP Client Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973904 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 195692] Review Request: guichan - Portable C++ GUI library for games using Allegro, SDL and OpenGL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195692 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||limburg...@gmail.com Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Package Change Request == Package Name: guichan New Branches: el6 Owners: limb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 973904] Review Request: libserf - High-Performance Asynchronous HTTP Client Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973904 --- Comment #24 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 977123] Review Request: nodejs-grunt-contrib-concat - Concatenate files with grunt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977123 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 977123] Review Request: nodejs-grunt-contrib-concat - Concatenate files with grunt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977123 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1025977] Review Request: captcp - TCP Analyzer for PCAP Files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025977 --- Comment #22 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1025977] Review Request: captcp - TCP Analyzer for PCAP Files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025977 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047596] Review Request: php-channel-phpseclib - Adds the phpseclib channel to PEAR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047596 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047478] Review Request: php-irodsphp - PHP client API for iRODS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047478 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047478] Review Request: php-irodsphp - PHP client API for iRODS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047478 --- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Invalid package name, no owners. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047596] Review Request: php-channel-phpseclib - Adds the phpseclib channel to PEAR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047596 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- No owners specified. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047599] Review Request: php-phpseclib-math-biginteger - Pure-PHP arbitrary precision integer arithmetic library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047599 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047599] Review Request: php-phpseclib-math-biginteger - Pure-PHP arbitrary precision integer arithmetic library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047599 --- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- No owners specified. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047600] Review Request: php-phpseclib-crypt-aes - Pure-PHP implementation of AES
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047600 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- No owners specified. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047600] Review Request: php-phpseclib-crypt-aes - Pure-PHP implementation of AES
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047600 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047601] Review Request: php-phpseclib-crypt-blowfish - Pure-PHP implementation of Blowfish
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047601 --- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- No owners specified. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047602] Review Request: php-phpseclib-crypt-des - Pure-PHP implementation of DES
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047602 --- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- No owners specified. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047601] Review Request: php-phpseclib-crypt-blowfish - Pure-PHP implementation of Blowfish
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047601 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047602] Review Request: php-phpseclib-crypt-des - Pure-PHP implementation of DES
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047602 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047603] Review Request: php-phpseclib-crypt-hash - Pure-PHP implementations of keyed-hash message authentication codes (HMACs) and various cryptographic hashing functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047603 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- No owners specified. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047604] Review Request: php-phpseclib-crypt-random - Random Number Generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047604 --- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- No owners specified. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047604] Review Request: php-phpseclib-crypt-random - Random Number Generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047604 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047603] Review Request: php-phpseclib-crypt-hash - Pure-PHP implementations of keyed-hash message authentication codes (HMACs) and various cryptographic hashing functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047603 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047605] Review Request: php-phpseclib-crypt-rc4 - Pure-PHP implementation of RC4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047605 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- No owners specified. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047605] Review Request: php-phpseclib-crypt-rc4 - Pure-PHP implementation of RC4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047605 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047607] Review Request: php-phpseclib-crypt-rijndael - Pure-PHP implementation of Rijndael
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047607 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Not in pkgdb, no owners. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047608] Review Request: php-phpseclib-crypt-rsa - Pure-PHP PKCS#1 (v2.1) compliant implementation of RSA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047608 --- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- No owners specified. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047607] Review Request: php-phpseclib-crypt-rijndael - Pure-PHP implementation of Rijndael
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047607 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047608] Review Request: php-phpseclib-crypt-rsa - Pure-PHP PKCS#1 (v2.1) compliant implementation of RSA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047608 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047609] Review Request: php-phpseclib-crypt-tripledes - Pure-PHP implementation of Triple DES
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047609 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047609] Review Request: php-phpseclib-crypt-tripledes - Pure-PHP implementation of Triple DES
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047609 --- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- No owners specified. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047610] Review Request: php-phpseclib-crypt-twofish - Pure-PHP implementation of Twofish
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047610 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- No owners specified. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047611] Review Request: php-phpseclib-net-ssh2 - Pure-PHP implementation of SSHv2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047611 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- No owners specified. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047611] Review Request: php-phpseclib-net-ssh2 - Pure-PHP implementation of SSHv2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047611 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047610] Review Request: php-phpseclib-crypt-twofish - Pure-PHP implementation of Twofish
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047610 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047612] Review Request: php-phpseclib-net-sftp - Pure-PHP implementation of SFTP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047612 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047612] Review Request: php-phpseclib-net-sftp - Pure-PHP implementation of SFTP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047612 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- No owners specified. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060245] Review Request: nodejs-simple-assert - Vanilla assertions for Node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060245 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060245] Review Request: nodejs-simple-assert - Vanilla assertions for Node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060245 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1051837] Review Request: python-tashaphyne - Arabic Light Stemmer and segmenter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051837 Mosaab Alzoubi moc...@hotmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Mosaab Alzoubi moc...@hotmail.com --- Thanks , OK . New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-tashaphyne Short Description: Arabic Light Stemmer and segmenter Owners: moceap Branches: f19 f20 el6 epel7 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060250] Review Request: nodejs-type-detect - Improved typeof detection for Node.js and the browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060250 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060250] Review Request: nodejs-type-detect - Improved typeof detection for Node.js and the browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060250 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060254] Review Request: nodejs-deep-eql - Improved deep equality testing for Node.js and the browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060254 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1066027] Review Request: csdiff - Non-interactive tools for processing code scan results in plain-text
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066027 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1066027] Review Request: csdiff - Non-interactive tools for processing code scan results in plain-text
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066027 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060254] Review Request: nodejs-deep-eql - Improved deep equality testing for Node.js and the browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060254 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
