[Bug 1057496] Review Request: senna - An embeddable fulltext search engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057496 --- Comment #8 from Christopher Meng --- No. n reply to HAYASHI Kentaro from comment #7) > Hi, I co-maintain Groonga packages which is successor of Senna. > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/groonga > > Senna is not maintained actively now. > > Are there specific reason dare to put Senna into Fedora? No. > I'm not intended to say that Senna should not maintain Senna package on > Fedora. > I hope that the user of Senna package could know "There is an successor of > Senna is already exists in Fedora". > > Could you mention about Groonga in spec file? No. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1073794] New: Review Request: Qt3D (qt5)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073794 Bug ID: 1073794 Summary: Review Request: Qt3D (qt5) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: tom...@tomasm.tk QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://tomasm.tk/fedorarepo/TMM/qt5-qt3d.spec SRPM URL: http://tomasm.tk/fedorarepo/TMM/SRPMS/qt5-qt3d-5.0.0-0.10.git20130923.7433868.TMM.fc20.src.rpm Description: Qt3D provides support for scripting Qt Quick applications in 3D using OpenGL. (It contains C++ headers as well, so I'm guessing upstream's description doesn't quite fit.) c.f. #858061 and #731794 There are still plans for Qt3D to become an official Qt submodule during a later 5.x release. I personally think Qt3D has reached at a point where it would be useful to include in Fedora now, and any investigation into packaging will be beneficial for future Qt releases anyway. There are a couple of issues with the spec file referenced, but unfortunately I'm not able to touch it at this time. If there is interest in Fedora shipping this package, I can fix outstanding issues early next week. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1073376] Review Request: lohit-gurmukhi-fonts - Free Gurmukhi font for Punjabi language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073376 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) --- Still not following in spec Obsoletes: lohit-punjabi-fonts < 2.5.3-4 but you can add this at time of fedora package initial import. APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1073378] Review Request: lohit-odia-fonts - Free opentype font for Odia language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073378
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
one last change needed use following in %install
make ttf %{?_smp_mflags}
APPROVED.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1070482] Review Request: reaver-wps - Brute force attack against Wifi Protected Setup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070482 Jaroslav Škarvada changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jskar...@redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Jaroslav Škarvada --- Hi, unfortunately I packaged reaver in parallel :) So at least I can share my patches and observations. It seems reaver is bundling wireless-tools and wpa_supplicant. I wasn't able to detect any relevant changes of the wireles-tools, so I unbundled it. Regarding wpa_supplicant I am afraid it is not possible to unbundle it. There is no library we could link to, the part of the code is there used like copylib. In case you are interested, my spec, srpm with patches: http://fedorapeople.org/~jskarvad/reaver/ Feel free to cherrypick anything you need from it. Also I could help you co-maintain the package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1071653] Review Request: kmscon - KMS/DRM based System Console
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071653
Lubomir Rintel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lubo.rin...@gooddata.com
--- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel ---
Thank you for packaging this.
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1)
> 3. %description:
>
> "See kmscon(1) man-page for usage information."
>
> You can drop this IMO.
Yeah. Ironically, you don't even ship the manual since you're missing the style
sheets. Please add the following:
+BuildRequires: docbook-style-xsl
...
%files
...
+%{_mandir}/man1/kmscon.1*
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 970411] Review Request: mingw-libid3tag - ID3 tag manipulation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970411 David King changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ulat...@yahoo.com Flags||needinfo?(ulat...@yahoo.com ||) --- Comment #3 from David King --- Hi, this review seems to be stalled, as you (Steve) have not responded to my comments for 1 month. Following https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews#Submitter_not_responding I will close this bug in a week if there is no further response. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1070230] Review Request: python-django15 - A high-level Python Web framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070230 --- Comment #7 from Matthias Runge --- Updated SPEC: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/python-django15.spec SRPM: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/python-django15-1.5.5-5.fc20.src.rpm - fixed docs build on rawhide (due an updted sphinx version - dropped obsoletes/provides - owned directories missing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001194] Review Request: cmpfit - A MINPACK-1 Least Squares Fitting Library in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001194
--- Comment #6 from Sergio Pascual ---
I have added DISCLAIMER to %doc and updated
requires in cmpfit-devel to %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
SPEC http://guaix.fis.ucm.es/~spr/fedora/cmpfit.spec
SRPM http://guaix.fis.ucm.es/~spr/fedora/cmpfit-1.2-2.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 949038] Review Request: php-horde-horde - Horde Application Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949038 --- Comment #4 from Remi Collet --- Spec: https://raw.github.com/remicollet/remirepo/eed38ae273b2d23fe01ead842ad6252f9add978f/php/horde/php-horde-horde/php-horde-horde.spec Srpm: http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/php-horde-horde-5.1.6-1.remi.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1071653] Review Request: kmscon - KMS/DRM based System Console
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071653 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) --- Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/kmscon.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/kmscon-8-3.fc20.src.rpm Description: KMS/DRM based System Console Changelog: - Add man page - Spec file clean-up - Enable pixman as a renderer Koji scratch build for f20: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6608832 About 2/ It was not enabled by default by upstream despite all dependencies was already available, this scratch build has it enabled and I will test. About 8/ .la files are not used in fedora, so sorting out which ones are removed is not important either. I've added the manpage, thx for the fix. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834501] Review Request: python-sure - Assertion toolbox for python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834501 Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda --- Package Change Request == Package Name: python-sure New Branches: el6 Owners: bkabrda -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 206266] Review Request: transmission - lightweight GTK+ BitTorrent client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206266 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834501] Review Request: python-sure - Assertion toolbox for python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834501 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834501] Review Request: python-sure - Assertion toolbox for python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834501 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1073559] Review Request: libinput - Input device library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073559 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1073559] Review Request: libinput - Input device library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073559 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 206266] Review Request: transmission - lightweight GTK+ BitTorrent client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206266 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1073559] Review Request: libinput - Input device library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073559 Kalev Lember changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||libinput-0.1.0-1.fc21 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-03-07 08:23:58 --- Comment #5 from Kalev Lember --- Package imported and built; closing the ticket. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 964318] Review Request: python-vmbuilder - Ubuntu's vmbuilder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964318 knakayama changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 964317] Review Request: apt-cacher-ng - Debian's apt repository proxy server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964317 knakayama changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1025904] Review Request: solr - Ultra-fast Lucene-based Search Server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025904 --- Comment #9 from Robert Rati --- The build fails on rawhide: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project solr-solrj: Could not resolve dependencies for project org.apache.solr:solr-solrj:jar:4.7.0: Cannot access maven-restlet (http://maven.restlet.org) in offline mode and the artifact io.netty:netty:jar:3.6.2.Final has not been downloaded from it before Please update to use the netty compat or netty 4 package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1072064] Review Request: python-nwdiag - nwdiag generates network-diagram images from text
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072064 Dridi Boukelmoune changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: nwdiag -|Review Request: |nwdiag generates|python-nwdiag - nwdiag |network-diagram images from |generates network-diagram |text|images from text Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Dridi Boukelmoune --- I have mistakenly forgotten the "python-" prefix for this package (not in the rpm spec though). New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-nwdiag Short Description: nwdiag generates network-diagram images from text Owners: dridi Branches: f19 f20 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1072063] Review Request: python-seqdiag - seqdiag generates sequence-diagram images from text
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072063 Dridi Boukelmoune changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: seqdiag - |Review Request: |seqdiag generates |python-seqdiag - seqdiag |sequence-diagram images |generates sequence-diagram |from text |images from text Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Dridi Boukelmoune --- I have mistakenly forgotten the "python-" prefix for this package (not in the rpm spec though). New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-seqdiag Short Description: seqdiag generates sequence-diagram images from text Owners: dridi Branches: f19 f20 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1072065] Review Request: python-actdiag - actdiag generates activity-diagram images from text
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072065 Dridi Boukelmoune changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: actdiag - |Review Request: |actdiag generates |python-actdiag - actdiag |activity-diagram images |generates activity-diagram |from text |images from text Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Dridi Boukelmoune --- I have mistakenly forgotten the "python-" prefix for this package (not in the rpm spec though). New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-actdiag Short Description: actdiag generates activity-diagram images from text Owners: dridi Branches: f19 f20 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1072063] Review Request: python-seqdiag - seqdiag generates sequence-diagram images from text
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072063 --- Comment #11 from Mukundan Ragavan --- yes, the spec files and package names are correct (comment #4). Unfortunately, I did not notice the title in the bug report either when I did the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 982428] Review Request: python-oslo-sphinx - OpenStack Sphinx Extensions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982428 Alan Pevec changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ape...@redhat.com --- Comment #12 from Alan Pevec --- This was renamed upstream to https://pypi.python.org/pypi/oslosphinx due to issues with pip in OpenStack CI jobs. For OpenStack Fedora packages you can do something like http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/openstack-keystone.git/commit/?id=64ec7a09422e9d362e67a8806c94f8879812e711 to make them build with python-oslo-sphinx RPM. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1073955] New: Review Request: kwalletmanager - Manage KDE passwords
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073955 Bug ID: 1073955 Summary: Review Request: kwalletmanager - Manage KDE passwords Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: rdie...@math.unl.edu QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kde/kwalletmanager.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kde/kwalletmanager-4.12.3-10.fc20.src.rpm Description: Manage KDE passwords Fedora Account System Username: rdieter Upstream rename kwallet -> kwalletmanager , this packaging follows suit. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1073955] Review Request: kwalletmanager - Manage KDE passwords
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073955 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews) Alias||kwalletmanager Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656997 [Bug 656997] kde-related package review tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001194] Review Request: cmpfit - A MINPACK-1 Least Squares Fitting Library in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001194 Mukundan Ragavan changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Mukundan Ragavan --- That looks good to me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 460044] Review Request: pssh - Parallel SSH tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460044 Tim Niemueller changed: What|Removed |Added CC||t...@niemueller.de Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Tim Niemueller --- Package Change Request == Package Name: pssh New Branches: el6 epel7 Owners: timn -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1059708] Review Request: phodav - a WebDAV server using libsoup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059708 --- Comment #7 from Marc-Andre Lureau --- hey hi hey ho -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1066028] Review Request: cswrap - Generic compiler wrapper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066028 Mukundan Ragavan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||nonamed...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|nonamed...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1073978] New: Review Request: photocollage - An image assembler with a Gtk GUI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073978 Bug ID: 1073978 Summary: Review Request: photocollage - An image assembler with a Gtk GUI Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: adrienve...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://adrienverge.fedorapeople.org/photocollage.spec SRPM URL: http://adrienverge.fedorapeople.org/photocollage-1.0-1.src.rpm Description: PhotoCollage is a graphical tool to create photo collage posters. It assembles the input photographs you give it to generate a big poster. Photos are arranged to fill the whole poster, however you can influence the algorithm to change the final layout. You can also set a custom border between photos, and save the generated image in the resolution you want. PhotoCollage does more or less the same as many commercial websites do, but for free and with open-source code. The SRPM builds on Koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6609469 This is my first package, so I need a sponsor. Thank you! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1073978] Review Request: photocollage - An image assembler with a Gtk GUI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073978 Adrien Vergé changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1073974] New: Review Request: python-pycadf - DMTF Cloud Audit (CADF) data model
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073974 Bug ID: 1073974 Summary: Review Request: python-pycadf - DMTF Cloud Audit (CADF) data model Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: p...@draigbrady.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pbrady/python-pycadf.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pbrady/python-pycadf-0.4.1-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: DMTF Cloud Audit (CADF) data model Fedora Account System Username: pbrady -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1073955] Review Request: kwalletmanager - Manage KDE passwords
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073955 Jan Grulich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jgrul...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jan Grulich --- It's just renamed package + added obsoletes, so there is nothing what could be wrong. I see only invalid URL, which should be https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdeutils/kwalletmanager. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1070482] Review Request: reaver-wps - Brute force attack against Wifi Protected Setup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070482 --- Comment #8 from James Wilson Harshaw IV --- (In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #7) > Hi, > > unfortunately I packaged reaver in parallel :) So at least I can share my > patches and observations. > > It seems reaver is bundling wireless-tools and wpa_supplicant. I wasn't able > to detect any relevant changes of the wireles-tools, so I unbundled it. > Regarding wpa_supplicant I am afraid it is not possible to unbundle it. > There is no library we could link to, the part of the code is there used > like copylib. > > In case you are interested, my spec, srpm with patches: > http://fedorapeople.org/~jskarvad/reaver/ > > Feel free to cherrypick anything you need from it. Also I could help you > co-maintain the package. No problem at all! I had also come to the realization that we couldn't unbundle the modified wpa_supplicant since it is integral to the functioning of reaver. I would love to co-maintain the package with you! We now just need to go on an make a case for the bundled (and modified) wpa_supplicant. Feel free to email me. -James -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1073955] Review Request: kwalletmanager - Manage KDE passwords
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073955 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter --- Thanks, I'll make sure to fix that prior to submitting any new builds. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: kwalletmanager Short Description: Manage KDE passwords Owners: than jreznik ltinkl rnovacek rdieter kkofler Branches: f20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 460044] Review Request: pssh - Parallel SSH tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460044 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 460044] Review Request: pssh - Parallel SSH tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460044 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001194] Review Request: cmpfit - A MINPACK-1 Least Squares Fitting Library in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001194 --- Comment #8 from Mukundan Ragavan --- Also, if you don't mind, I can co-maintain the package with you. my FAS username is nonamedotc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1072063] Review Request: python-seqdiag - seqdiag generates sequence-diagram images from text
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072063 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1073955] Review Request: kwalletmanager - Manage KDE passwords
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073955 --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter --- (adding jgrulich too) New Package SCM Request === Package Name: kwalletmanager Short Description: Manage KDE passwords Owners: than jreznik ltinkl rnovacek rdieter kkofler jgrulich Branches: f20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1072064] Review Request: python-nwdiag - nwdiag generates network-diagram images from text
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072064 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1072064] Review Request: python-nwdiag - nwdiag generates network-diagram images from text
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072064 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1072063] Review Request: python-seqdiag - seqdiag generates sequence-diagram images from text
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072063 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1072065] Review Request: python-actdiag - actdiag generates activity-diagram images from text
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072065 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1072065] Review Request: python-actdiag - actdiag generates activity-diagram images from text
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072065 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1073955] Review Request: kwalletmanager - Manage KDE passwords
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073955 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1073955] Review Request: kwalletmanager - Manage KDE passwords
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073955 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058445] Review Request: python-taskflow - Taskflow structured state management library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058445 Alan Pevec changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-03-07 10:41:55 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1070482] Review Request: reaver-wps - Brute force attack against Wifi Protected Setup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070482 --- Comment #9 from Jaroslav Škarvada --- (In reply to James Wilson Harshaw IV from comment #8) According to [1] I think we need: Provides: bundled(wpa_supplicant) = 0.7.3 I will create FESCO ticket for bundling exception. Also I will take the review. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries#Requirement_if_you_bundle -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1070482] Review Request: reaver-wps - Brute force attack against Wifi Protected Setup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070482 --- Comment #10 from James Wilson Harshaw IV --- Wunderbar. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1070482] Review Request: reaver-wps - Brute force attack against Wifi Protected Setup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070482 Jaroslav Škarvada changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED QA Contact|extras...@fedoraproject.org |jskar...@redhat.com --- Comment #11 from Jaroslav Škarvada --- I think I currently cannot sponsor you, but I will try to become sponsor (I am already proven packager). I will open another ticket :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1073974] Review Request: python-pycadf - DMTF Cloud Audit (CADF) data model
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073974
Alan Pevec changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ape...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Alan Pevec ---
%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/%{pypi_name}/*.conf
==> should also add %{_sysconfdir}/%{pypi_name}
From fedora-review:
[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /etc/pycadf
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1073974] Review Request: python-pycadf - DMTF Cloud Audit (CADF) data model
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073974 --- Comment #2 from Alan Pevec --- and [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /etc/pycadf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1070482] Review Request: reaver-wps - Brute force attack against Wifi Protected Setup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070482 --- Comment #12 from James Wilson Harshaw IV --- Thank you so much :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 459010] Review request: pystatgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459010 Abdel Gadiel Martínez Lassonde changed: What|Removed |Added CC||abdel.g.martine...@gmail.co ||m --- Comment #29 from Abdel Gadiel Martínez Lassonde --- I know this package have been marked as orphan but I will take ownership of it. Right now it does not have upstream updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1073955] Review Request: kwalletmanager - Manage KDE passwords
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073955 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jgrul...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1066629] Review Request: openstack-tripleo - OpenStack TripleO
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066629
Angus Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||atho...@redhat.com
--- Comment #8 from Angus Thomas ---
Hi. I'll do an informal review
Is it safe to put all those executables into /usr/bin, rather than in a
a tripleo-specific directory. Some of the names look dangerously generalised
e.g. /usr/bin/cleanup-env /usr/bin/set-os-type /usr/bin/user-config &
/usr/bin/wait_for
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated". 11 files have unknown license.
Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/athomas/openstack-
tripleo/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[!]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
Note: No (noreplace) in %config /etc/tripleo
Is the absence of noreplace justified?
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: No %config files under /usr.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages s
[Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 Michal Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #27 from Michal Schmidt --- Package Change Request == Package Name: smem New Branches: el6 epel7 Owners: michich mattdm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 741529] Review Request: python-futures - Backport of the concurrent.futures package from Python 3.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741529 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- python-futures-2.1.6-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001194] Review Request: cmpfit - A MINPACK-1 Least Squares Fitting Library in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001194 Sergio Pascual changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Sergio Pascual --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: cmpfit Short Description: A MINPACK-1 Least Squares Fitting Library in C Owners: sergiopr nonamedotc Branches: f19 f20 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1074046] New: Review Request: telegram - Private, fast and open platform for instant messaging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074046 Bug ID: 1074046 Summary: Review Request: telegram - Private, fast and open platform for instant messaging Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: anto.tra...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/telegram/telegram.spec SRPM URL: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/telegram/telegram-0-0.1.20140307git8b78b6.fc20.src.rpm Description: Telegram is an Open Source messaging platform for mobile and desktop focused on privacy. This is a Linux Command-line interface for Telegram. Fedora Account System Username: sagitter -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1074046] Review Request: telegram - Private, fast and open platform for instant messaging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074046 --- Comment #1 from Antonio Trande --- Koji build in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6610536 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 --- Comment #28 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001194] Review Request: cmpfit - A MINPACK-1 Least Squares Fitting Library in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001194 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001194] Review Request: cmpfit - A MINPACK-1 Least Squares Fitting Library in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001194 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1073978] Review Request: photocollage - An image assembler with a Gtk GUI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073978 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anto.tra...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Antonio Trande --- Hi Adrien. You don't need to define Name, Version and Release macros because they are already defined. Vendor tag must not be used. SourceX tag is a complete link to the source archive. Prefix tag is unnecessary. Buildroot tag is used only for EPEL5 packages or for old Fedora releases (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL:Packaging#BuildRoot_tag and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag). As Buildroot, %clean section is unnecessary for recent Fedora releases (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25clean) like so %defattr line (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_Permissions). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1066629] Review Request: openstack-tripleo - OpenStack TripleO
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066629 --- Comment #9 from Steven Dake --- Angus, There are a bit of steps beyond just providing the output of the fedora-review tool. The fedora-review tool makes life a whole bunch easier, but each step should be confirmed. Especially the rpmlint out should be analyzed to identify blockers from the reviewers perspective about what needs to be fixed versus which can be ignored. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1070482] Review Request: reaver-wps - Brute force attack against Wifi Protected Setup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070482 Jaroslav Škarvada changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d...@redhat.com --- Comment #13 from Jaroslav Škarvada --- We need reply to the following question: Whether the bundled wpa_supplicant code was modified and if yes, how it was modified. I need it to open the FPC ticket. James, I noticed, you have already contacted upstream, could you ask them this question? Thanks. Also CCing wpa_supplicant maintainer in case he would have any comments. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1070482] Review Request: reaver-wps - Brute force attack against Wifi Protected Setup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070482 --- Comment #14 from James Wilson Harshaw IV --- I have contacted upstream awhile ago asking that question, and have yet to receive a response. I will try again though. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1070482] Review Request: reaver-wps - Brute force attack against Wifi Protected Setup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070482 --- Comment #15 from James Wilson Harshaw IV --- It does state in the README that "The following files have been taken from wpa_supplicant. Some have been modified from their original sources: o common/* o crypto/* o tls/* o utils/* o wps/* " but does not state which were modified. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1070482] Review Request: reaver-wps - Brute force attack against Wifi Protected Setup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070482 --- Comment #16 from James Wilson Harshaw IV --- We could possibly just take those specific files from wpa_supplicant and see what code differs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1065758] Review Request: omniORBpy - Robust high-performance CORBA ORB for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065758 --- Comment #18 from Sandro Mani --- Hi Richard, what is the status with this? I should be able to continue looking at salome in the coming weeks, so would be nice to have this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1070482] Review Request: reaver-wps - Brute force attack against Wifi Protected Setup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070482 --- Comment #17 from Jaroslav Škarvada --- (In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #11) > I think I currently cannot sponsor you, but I will try to become sponsor (I > am already proven packager). I will open another ticket :) Ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/packager-sponsors/ticket/125 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1074102] New: Review Request: rpm-ostree - Commit RPMs to an OSTree repository
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074102 Bug ID: 1074102 Summary: Review Request: rpm-ostree - Commit RPMs to an OSTree repository Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: walt...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~walters/rpm-ostree.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~walters/rpm-ostree-2014.5.4.g9aa1bdb-1.el7.src.rpm Description: This tool takes a set of packages, and commits them to an OSTree repository. At the moment, it is intended for use on build servers. Fedora Account System Username: walters -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1073978] Review Request: photocollage - An image assembler with a Gtk GUI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073978 --- Comment #2 from Adrien Vergé --- Hi Antonio, Thank you for your remarks, I've changed all that needed to be corrected. The new spec and SRPM are now at: http://adrienverge.fedorapeople.org/packages/photocollage.spec http://adrienverge.fedorapeople.org/packages/photocollage-1.0-1.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1025904] Review Request: solr - Ultra-fast Lucene-based Search Server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025904 --- Comment #10 from gil cattaneo --- (In reply to Robert Rati from comment #9) > The build fails on rawhide: > > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project solr-solrj: Could not resolve > dependencies for project org.apache.solr:solr-solrj:jar:4.7.0: Cannot access > maven-restlet (http://maven.restlet.org) in offline mode and the artifact > io.netty:netty:jar:3.6.2.Final has not been downloaded from it before > > Please update to use the netty compat or netty 4 package. Upstream pom files have redundant dependencies, generated by maven-ant-tasks see solr-4.7.0/dev-tools/maven/solr/core/src/java/pom.xml.template @solr-core.internal.dependencies@ @solr-core.external.dependencies@ Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/solr.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/solr-4.7.0-1.fc19.src.rpm Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6610899 sorry for the inconvenience -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1073974] Review Request: python-pycadf - DMTF Cloud Audit (CADF) data model
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073974 Pádraig Brady changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pbr...@redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Pádraig Brady --- Grr why didn't rpmlint or my fedora-review warn me about that -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1073974] Review Request: python-pycadf - DMTF Cloud Audit (CADF) data model
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073974 --- Comment #4 from Pádraig Brady --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pbrady/python-pycadf.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pbrady/python-pycadf-0.4.1-2.fc20.src.rpm Description: DMTF Cloud Audit (CADF) data model Fedora Account System Username: pbrady -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1070230] Review Request: python-django15 - A high-level Python Web framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070230 --- Comment #8 from Lars Kellogg-Stedman --- Matthias, You're going to hate me, but this package still results in a bunch of unowned directory errors: [ ]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. Note: No known owner of /usr/lib/python3.3/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py3.3.egg/django/contrib/localflavor/locale/en_GB, /usr/lib/python3.3/site-packages/Django-1.5.5-py3.3.egg, /usr/lib/python3.3/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py3.3.egg/django/contrib/localflavor/locale/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python3.3/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py3.3.egg/django/contrib/localflavor/locale/es_MX/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python3.3/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py3.3.egg/django/contrib/admin/locale/udm, /usr/lib/python3.3/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py3.3.egg/django/contrib/localflavor/locale/en_GB/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python3.3/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py3.3.egg/django/contrib/localflavor/locale/sr_Latn, /usr/lib/python3.3/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py3.3.egg/django/contrib/admindocs/locale/udm, /usr/lib/python3.3/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py3.3.egg/django/contrib/localflavor/locale/pt_BR, /usr/lib/python3.3/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py3.3.egg/django/contrib/localflavor/locale/fy_NL/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python3.3/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py3.3.egg/django/contrib/localflavor/locale/zh_TW, /usr/lib/python3.3/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py3.3.egg/django/contrib/localflavor/locale/zh_CN, /usr/lib/python3.3/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py3.3.egg/django/contrib/localflavor/locale/es_AR, /usr/lib/python3.3/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py3.3.egg/django/contrib/localflavor/locale/fy_NL, /usr/lib/python3.3/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py3.3.egg/django/contrib/localflavor/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python3.3/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py3.3.egg/django/contrib/localflavor/locale/es_MX, /usr/lib/python3.3/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py3.3.egg/django/contrib/localflavor/locale/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python3.3/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py3.3.egg/django/contrib/flatpages/locale/udm, /usr/lib/python3.3/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py3.3.egg/django/contrib/localflavor/locale/es_AR/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python3.3/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py3.3.egg/django/conf/locale/__pycache__, /usr/lib/python3.3/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py3.3.egg/django/conf/locale/udm, /usr/lib/python3.3/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py3.3.egg/django/contrib/localflavor/locale/sr_Latn/LC_MESSAGES [ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py2.7.egg/django/contrib/localflavor/locale/en, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py2.7.egg/django/contrib/localflavor/locale/eo, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py2.7.egg/django/contrib/localflavor/locale/el, /usr/lib/python3.3/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py3.3.egg/django/contrib/localflavor/locale/en_GB, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py2.7.egg/django/contrib/localflavor/locale/sl/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py2.7.egg/django/contrib/localflavor/locale/ar/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py2.7.egg/django/contrib/localflavor/locale/sr_Latn, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py2.7.egg/django/contrib/localflavor/locale/et, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py2.7.egg/django/contrib/localflavor/locale/eu, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py2.7.egg/django/contrib/localflavor/locale/eu/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py2.7.egg/django/contrib/localflavor/locale/es, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py2.7.egg/django/contrib/localflavor/locale/mk/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py2.7.egg/django/contrib/localflavor/locale/ja/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python3.3/site-packages/Django-1.5.5-py3.3.egg, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py2.7.egg/django/contrib/localflavor/locale/nl, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py2.7.egg/django/contrib/localflavor/locale/nb, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py2.7.egg/django/contrib/localflavor/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py2.7.egg/django/contrib/localflavor/locale/is/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py2.7.egg/django/contrib/admin/locale/udm, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py2.7.egg/django/contrib/localflavor/locale/bs/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/Django-1.5.5-py2.7.
[Bug 822327] Review Request: mediainfo - Supplies technical and tag information about a video or audio file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822327 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- mediainfo-0.7.67-3.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 960142] Review Request: rubygem-faker - Easily generate fake data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960142 Anuj More changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-03-07 23:39:55 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 967334] Review Request: rubygem-connection_pool - Generic connection pool for Ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967334 Anuj More changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-03-07 23:40:34 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 960064] Review Request: rubygem-lumberjack - A fast logging utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960064 Anuj More changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-03-07 23:41:31 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 960061] Review Request: rubygem-guard - Guard gives notifications about file modifications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960061 Bug 960061 depends on bug 960064, which changed state. Bug 960064 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-lumberjack - A fast logging utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960064 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1074128] New: Review Request: libserialport - Library for accessing serial ports
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074128 Bug ID: 1074128 Summary: Review Request: libserialport - Library for accessing serial ports Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mr.nuke...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://gtech.myftp.org/~mrnuke/fedrev/libserialport-0.1.0-0.2.20140110git3ceb8ae/libserialport.spec SRPM URL: http://gtech.myftp.org/~mrnuke/fedrev/libserialport-0.1.0-0.2.20140110git3ceb8ae/libserialport-0.1.0-0.2.20140110git3ceb8ae.fc20.src.rpm Description: libserialport is a minimal library written in C that is intended to take care of the OS-specific details when writing software that uses serial ports. By writing your serial code to use libserialport, you enable it to work transparently on any platform supported by the library. The operations that are supported are: - Port enumeration (obtaining a list of serial ports on the system). - Opening and closing ports. - Setting port parameters (baud rate, parity, etc). - Reading, writing and flushing data. - Obtaining error information. Fedora Account System Username: mrnuke Additional info: libserialport has not yet seen an official release. That will probably happen around the same time with a new libsigrok release. I want to get this package in before that happens, as libsigrok will depend on this package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1074129] New: Review Request: perl-Compress-LZF - Extremely light-weight Lempel-Ziv-Free compression
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074129 Bug ID: 1074129 Summary: Review Request: perl-Compress-LZF - Extremely light-weight Lempel-Ziv-Free compression Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dd...@cpan.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://ddick.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Compress-LZF.spec SRPM URL: http://ddick.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Compress-LZF-3.7-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: Extremely light-weight Lempel-Ziv-Free compression Fedora Account System Username: ddick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1057872] Review Request: libusbg - Library for USB gadget-configfs userspace functionality
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057872 --- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng --- ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1071653] Review Request: kmscon - KMS/DRM based System Console
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071653 --- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng --- Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated = MUST items = C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "GPL (v2 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 7 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck: GPL (v2 or later) - kmscon-8/build-aux/ltmain.sh MIT/X11 (BSD like) -- kmscon-8/src/conf.c kmscon-8/src/conf.h kmscon-8/src/eloop.c kmscon-8/src/eloop.h kmscon-8/src/font.c kmscon-8/src/font.h kmscon-8/src/font_8x16.c kmscon-8/src/font_pango.c kmscon-8/src/font_unifont.c kmscon-8/src/genshader.c kmscon-8/src/genunifont.c kmscon-8/src/kmscon_conf.c kmscon-8/src/kmscon_conf.h kmscon-8/src/kmscon_dummy.c kmscon-8/src/kmscon_dummy.h kmscon-8/src/kmscon_main.c kmscon-8/src/kmscon_mod_bbulk.c kmscon-8/src/kmscon_mod_gltex.c kmscon-8/src/kmscon_mod_pango.c kmscon-8/src/kmscon_mod_pixman.c kmscon-8/src/kmscon_mod_unifont.c kmscon-8/src/kmscon_module.c kmscon-8/src/kmscon_module.h kmscon-8/src/kmscon_module_interface.h kmscon-8/src/kmscon_seat.c kmscon-8/src/kmscon_seat.h kmscon-8/src/kmscon_terminal.c kmscon-8/src/kmscon_terminal.h kmscon-8/src/pty.c kmscon-8/src/pty.h kmscon-8/src/shl_array.h kmscon-8/src/shl_dlist.h kmscon-8/src/shl_flagset.h kmscon-8/src/shl_githead.h kmscon-8/src/shl_hashtable.h kmscon-8/src/shl_hook.h kmscon-8/src/shl_misc.h kmscon-8/src/shl_register.h kmscon-8/src/shl_ring.h kmscon-8/src/shl_timer.h kmscon-8/src/static_gl.h kmscon-8/src/static_gl_math.c kmscon-8/src/static_gl_shader.c kmscon-8/src/text.c kmscon-8/src/text.h kmscon-8/src/text_bblit.c kmscon-8/src/text_bbulk.c kmscon-8/src/text_gltex.c kmscon-8/src/text_pixman.c kmscon-8/src/uterm_drm2d_internal.h kmscon-8/src/uterm_drm2d_render.c kmscon-8/src/uterm_drm2d_video.c kmscon-8/src/uterm_drm3d_internal.h kmscon-8/src/uterm_drm3d_render.c kmscon-8/src/uterm_drm3d_video.c kmscon-8/src/uterm_drm_shared.c kmscon-8/src/uterm_drm_shared_internal.h kmscon-8/src/uterm_fbdev_internal.h kmscon-8/src/uterm_fbdev_render.c kmscon-8/src/uterm_fbdev_video.c kmscon-8/src/uterm_input.c kmscon-8/src/uterm_input.h kmscon-8/src/uterm_input_internal.h kmscon-8/src/uterm_input_uxkb.c kmscon-8/src/uterm_monitor.c kmscon-8/src/uterm_monitor.h kmscon-8/src/uterm_systemd.c kmscon-8/src/uterm_systemd_internal.h kmscon-8/src/uterm_video.c kmscon-8/src/uterm_video.h kmscon-8/src/uterm_video_internal.h kmscon-8/src/uterm_vt.c kmscon-8/src/uterm_vt.h kmscon-8/tests/test_include.h kmscon-8/tests/test_input.c kmscon-8/tests/test_key.c kmscon-8/tests/test_output.c kmscon-8/tests/test_vt.c Unknown or generated kmscon-8/external/htable.c kmscon-8/external/htable.h kmscon-8/src/genversion.sh kmscon-8/src/shl_githead.c kmscon-8/src/shl_llog.h kmscon-8/src/shl_log.c kmscon-8/src/shl_log.h [x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 3 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and buil
[Bug 1074129] Review Request: perl-Compress-LZF - Extremely light-weight Lempel-Ziv-Free compression
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074129 --- Comment #1 from David Dick --- koji build at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6611436 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1073978] Review Request: photocollage - An image assembler with a Gtk GUI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073978
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng ---
# - python3-pillow for PIL.Image and PIL.ImageDraw
# - python3-gobject for gi.repository
# - gettext for gettext
# - copy, io, math, multiprocessing, os.path, random
# and threading are built-in python3-libs
You can remove these.
-
What does this line stand for?
%{__install} -d %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons
-
update-mime-database %{_datadir}/mime &> /dev/null || :
Please read carefully:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#mimeinfo
-
You can drop group tag.
-
You are the upstream of this package, please ship an appdata file for packages
with desktop file:
http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2013/08/19/appdata-proposal-a-k-a-how-to-make-your-application-appear-in-the-software-center/
http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/appdata/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1074138] New: Review Request: perl-Compress-LZ4 - Perl interface to the LZ4 (de)compressor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074138 Bug ID: 1074138 Summary: Review Request: perl-Compress-LZ4 - Perl interface to the LZ4 (de)compressor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dd...@cpan.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://ddick.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Compress-LZ4.spec SRPM URL: http://ddick.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Compress-LZ4-0.19-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: Perl interface to the LZ4 (de)compressor Fedora Account System Username: ddick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1074138] Review Request: perl-Compress-LZ4 - Perl interface to the LZ4 (de)compressor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074138 --- Comment #1 from David Dick --- koji build at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6611502 the "ex" directory has been deliberately excluded as it contains a benchmark file that depends on Compress::Snappy. The Compress::Snappy distribution also contains this file and it depends on Compress::LZ4, therefore creating a circular dependency. I plan to package perl-Compress-Snappy when this package is released, and then go back to re-package perl-Compress-LZ4 with the "ex" directory included. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 977638] Review Request: python-espeak - Python bindings for espeak
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977638
Eduardo Echeverria changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #36 from Eduardo Echeverria ---
Sorry for delay, i was a bit offline due to some work things
Let's go with the review.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[-]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"GPL (v3 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 2 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/echevemaster/test-
packages/977638-python-espeak/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 81920 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]:
[Bug 977638] Review Request: python-espeak - Python bindings for espeak
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977638 --- Comment #37 from Eduardo Echeverria --- Eduardo, your provided username mayorgalinux is inactive do you have another username named mayorga.so at this I applied your new packager status. Based in your bugzilla email and matching it with your account in FAS accounts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 964317] Review Request: apt-cacher-ng - Debian's apt repository proxy server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964317 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | --- Comment #6 from Christopher Meng --- (In reply to knakayama from comment #5) > Updated spec file to Systemd modern style[1]. > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Systemd > > Updated Spec URL: http://diy-kenjiro.rhcloud.com/rpms/apt-cacher-ng.spec > Updated SRPM URL: > http://diy-kenjiro.rhcloud.com/rpms/apt-cacher-ng-0.7.11-3.fc20.src.rpm Are you the submitter? Or reviewer? If you are the submitter, please open a new bug. If you are the reviewer, please set assignee to you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
