[Bug 1078994] Review Request: kde-plasma-milou - Plasma applet for searching almost anything

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078994

Jan Grulich  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2014-05-02 04:11:21



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1092629] Review Request: jmapviewer

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092629

Michael Simacek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #11 from Michael Simacek  ---
Thanks!

New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: jmapviewer
Short Description: A java component to integrate an OSM map view into your Java
application
Owners: msimacek mizdebsk msrb
Branches: f19 f20
InitialCC: java-sig

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1093499] Review Request: california - Calendar application

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093499

David King  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||amigad...@amigadave.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|amigad...@amigadave.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1065641] Review Request: libhttpserver - Library embedding RESTful HTTP server functionality

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065641



--- Comment #10 from Šimon Lukašík  ---
Thank You for the comment. I have made requested changes:

* Fri May 02 2014 Šimon Lukašík  - 0.7.1-2
- removed group tags
- added doc tag

http://isimluk.fedorapeople.org/libhttpserver/0.7.1-2/libhttpserver.spec
http://isimluk.fedorapeople.org/libhttpserver/0.7.1-2/libhttpserver-0.7.1-2.fc20.src.rpm

Please review!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1093499] Review Request: california - Calendar application

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093499



--- Comment #1 from David King  ---
Just the update-desktop-database scriptlet needs adding.

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
===
- update-desktop-database is invoked in %post and %postun if package contains
  desktop file(s) with a MimeType: entry.
  Note: desktop file(s) with MimeType entry in california
  See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#desktop-
  database

This is valid, and the only thing that needs fixing.

= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
 "Unknown or generated". 209 files have unknown license. Detailed output
 of licensecheck in
 /home/david/checkout/rpms/1093499-california/licensecheck.txt
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
 supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
 in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
 for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
 are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop-
 file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
 in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
 from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[x]: %check is pre

[Bug 1093639] New: Review Request: perl-Protocol-WebSocket - WebSocket protocol

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093639

Bug ID: 1093639
   Summary: Review Request: perl-Protocol-WebSocket - WebSocket
protocol
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: dd...@cpan.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: http://ddick.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Protocol-WebSocket
SRPM URL: http://ddick.fedorapeople.org/packages/
Description: WebSocket protocol
Fedora Account System Username: ddick

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1093639] Review Request: perl-Protocol-WebSocket - WebSocket protocol

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093639

David Dick  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Last Closed||2014-05-02 05:33:54



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1093640] New: Review Request: -

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093640

Bug ID: 1093640
   Summary: Review Request:  - 
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: dd...@cpan.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: http://ddick.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Protocol-WebSocket.spec
SRPM URL:
http://ddick.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Protocol-WebSocket-0.17-1.fc20.src.rpm
Description: WebSocket protocol
Fedora Account System Username: ddick

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1093640] Review Request: perl-Protocol-WebSocket - WebSocket protocol

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093640

David Dick  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Review Request:  -|WebSocket protocol



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1093640] Review Request: perl-Protocol-WebSocket - WebSocket protocol

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093640



--- Comment #1 from David Dick  ---
koji builds at

el6 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6805821

rawhide http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6805837

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1092149] Review Request: dib-utils - Standalone parts of diskimage-builder

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092149

Steven Hardy  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #8 from Steven Hardy  ---
My review comments have all been addressed, thanks!  Setting fedora-review +.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1093499] Review Request: california - Calendar application

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093499



--- Comment #2 from Kalev Lember  ---
(In reply to David King from comment #1)
> Just the update-desktop-database scriptlet needs adding.

Fixed, thanks.

* Fri May 02 2014 Kalev Lember  - 0.1.0-2
- Add rpm scripts to run update-desktop-database (#1093499)

Spec URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/california.spec
SRPM URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/california-0.1.0-2.fc21.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1093499] Review Request: california - Calendar application

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093499

David King  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #3 from David King  ---
Looks good, thanks!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1093499] Review Request: california - Calendar application

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093499

Kalev Lember  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #4 from Kalev Lember  ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: california
Short Description: Calendar application
Owners: kalev
Branches:
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1086664] Review Request: rubygem-actionview - Rendering framework putting the V in MVC (part of Rails)

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086664

Josef Stribny  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2014-05-02 07:09:32



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1062901] Review Request: openspecfun - Library providing a collection of special mathematical functions

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062901



--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1062901] Review Request: openspecfun - Library providing a collection of special mathematical functions

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062901

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1079967] Review Request: fedwatch - Tool for watching fedmsg messages and running arbitrary scripts

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079967



--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1079967] Review Request: fedwatch - Tool for watching fedmsg messages and running arbitrary scripts

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079967

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1092629] Review Request: jmapviewer

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092629



--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1092629] Review Request: jmapviewer

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092629

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1093499] Review Request: california - Calendar application

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093499



--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1093499] Review Request: california - Calendar application

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093499

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1093499] Review Request: california - Calendar application

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093499

Kalev Lember  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||california-0.1.0-2.fc21
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2014-05-02 08:29:49



--- Comment #6 from Kalev Lember  ---
Package imported and built; closing the ticket.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1079967] Review Request: fedwatch - Tool for watching fedmsg messages and running arbitrary scripts

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079967



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
fedwatch-0.4-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fedwatch-0.4-2.el6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1079967] Review Request: fedwatch - Tool for watching fedmsg messages and running arbitrary scripts

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079967



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
fedwatch-0.4-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fedwatch-0.4-2.fc20

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1079967] Review Request: fedwatch - Tool for watching fedmsg messages and running arbitrary scripts

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079967

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1084976] Review Request: eclipse-xsd - XML Schema Definition (XSD) Eclipse plug-in

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084976

Mat Booth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2014-05-02 09:47:28



--- Comment #8 from Mat Booth  ---
Built for all requested branches.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1085030] Review Request: golang-github-openshift-go-json-rest - A quick and easy way to setup a RESTful JSON API

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085030



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-openshift-go-json-rest-0-0.1.git7715b15.fc20 has been submitted
as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-openshift-go-json-rest-0-0.1.git7715b15.fc20

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1079753] Review Request: perl-LWP-Protocol-connect - Provides HTTP/CONNECT proxy support for LWP::UserAgent

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079753



--- Comment #10 from Sven Nierlein  ---
Not yet, sorry, i was busy and on vacation. I will take care soon.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 210323] Review Request: perl-File-DesktopEntry - Object to handle .desktop files

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210323

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||p...@city-fan.org
  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #5 from Paul Howarth  ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: perl-File-DesktopEntry
New Branches: el6
Owners: pghmcfc ktdreyer
InitialCC: perl-sig

I (pghmcfc) am already the owner of this package in EPEL-7.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 210322] Review Request: perl-File-MimeInfo - Determine file type

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210322

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||p...@city-fan.org
  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #4 from Paul Howarth  ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: perl-File-MimeInfo
New Branches: el6
Owners: pghmcfc ktdreyer
InitialCC: perl-sig

I (pghmcfc) am already the owner of this package in EPEL-7.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 210322] Review Request: perl-File-MimeInfo - Determine file type

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210322



--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 210322] Review Request: perl-File-MimeInfo - Determine file type

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210322

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 210323] Review Request: perl-File-DesktopEntry - Object to handle .desktop files

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210323

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 210323] Review Request: perl-File-DesktopEntry - Object to handle .desktop files

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210323



--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1080583] Review Request: compat-qpid-cpp - Compatibility modules for Qpid

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080583



--- Comment #9 from Darryl L. Pierce  ---
(In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #8)
> Hi Darryl, I think this one also needs a -doc subpackage. There is a
> client-devel-docs but, I think this needs to be addressed as well(?)

I might be misunderstanding something, but I don't know what "this one" refers
to in the above sentence. We have a compat-qpid-cpp-client-devel-doc subpackage
that is capturing all of the generated documentation. What other docs are you
referring to?

> - Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
> (~1MB)
>   or number of files.
>   Note: Documentation size is 19148800 bytes in 1154 files.
>   See:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#PackageDocumentation
> 
> and this,
> 
> - ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
>   Note: /sbin/ldconfig not called in compat-qpid-cpp-server
>   See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Shared_Libraries
> 
> Also, I think there are some rpmlint errors that we should address as well.
> 
> (1)
> compat-qpid-cpp-client-devel.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
> /usr/bin/qpid-topic-listener ['/builddir/build/BUILD/qpid-0.24/cpp/src', '']
> compat-qpid-cpp-client-devel.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
> /usr/bin/qpid-client-test ['/builddir/build/BUILD/qpid-0.24/cpp/src', '']
> compat-qpid-cpp-client-devel.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
> /usr/bin/qpid-latency-test ['/builddir/build/BUILD/qpid-0.24/cpp/src', '']
> compat-qpid-cpp-client-devel.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
> /usr/bin/qpid-txtest ['/builddir/build/BUILD/qpid-0.24/cpp/src', '']
> compat-qpid-cpp-client-devel.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
> /usr/bin/qpid-topic-publisher ['/builddir/build/BUILD/qpid-0.24/cpp/src', '']
> compat-qpid-cpp-client-devel.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
> /usr/bin/qpid-perftest ['/builddir/build/BUILD/qpid-0.24/cpp/src', '']

Very strange here. CMake usually has the rpath problem if you use
install(files) rather than install(targets), with the latter case stripping the
data as expected.

So to fix this I've added -DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH:BOOL=ON to the build and the rpath
information isn't getting created at all now.

> (2) E: explicit-lib-dependency libaio
> 
> Requires:  libaio under %package server-store
> 
> Could you please take a look?

Fixed thi sas well.

Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6806842
Updated spec:  http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/compat-qpid-cpp.spec
Updated srpm: 
http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/compat-qpid-cpp-0.24-5.fc20.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 210323] Review Request: perl-File-DesktopEntry - Object to handle .desktop files

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210323



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-File-DesktopEntry-0.08-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-File-DesktopEntry-0.08-1.el6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1092096] Review Request: jortho - A spell checker for Java

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092096



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
jortho-1.0-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jortho-1.0-2.fc19

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 210322] Review Request: perl-File-MimeInfo - Determine file type

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210322



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-File-MimeInfo-0.25-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-File-MimeInfo-0.25-1.el6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1092096] Review Request: jortho - A spell checker for Java

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092096



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
jortho-1.0-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jortho-1.0-2.fc20

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1092629] Review Request: jmapviewer

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092629



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
jmapviewer-1.03-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jmapviewer-1.03-1.fc20

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1085019] Review Request: golang-github-kraman-libcontainer - Reference implementation for containers

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085019

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||golang-github-kraman-libcon
   ||tainer-0-0.1.gitd700e5b.el6
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2014-05-02 11:59:04



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-kraman-libcontainer-0-0.1.gitd700e5b.el6 has been pushed to the
Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1092629] Review Request: jmapviewer

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092629

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1086378] Review Request: geard - CLI client for installing Docker images as containers

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086378
Bug 1086378 depends on bug 1085019, which changed state.

Bug 1085019 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-kraman-libcontainer - 
Reference implementation for containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085019

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1085030] Review Request: golang-github-openshift-go-json-rest - A quick and easy way to setup a RESTful JSON API

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085030

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||golang-github-openshift-go-
   ||json-rest-0-0.1.git7715b15.
   ||el6
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2014-05-02 11:59:23



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-openshift-go-json-rest-0-0.1.git7715b15.el6 has been pushed to
the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1079967] Review Request: fedwatch - Tool for watching fedmsg messages and running arbitrary scripts

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079967

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
fedwatch-0.4-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1086378] Review Request: geard - CLI client for installing Docker images as containers

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086378
Bug 1086378 depends on bug 1085873, which changed state.

Bug 1085873 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-openshift-go-systemd - Go 
bindings to systemd D-BUS APIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085873

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1082734] Review Request: golang-github-godbus-dbus - Go client bindings for D-Bus

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082734

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||golang-github-godbus-dbus-0
   ||-0.1.gitcb98efb.el6
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2014-05-02 11:59:42



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-godbus-dbus-0-0.1.gitcb98efb.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora
EPEL 6 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1086378] Review Request: geard - CLI client for installing Docker images as containers

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086378
Bug 1086378 depends on bug 1085030, which changed state.

Bug 1085030 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-openshift-go-json-rest - A 
quick and easy way to setup a RESTful JSON API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085030

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1085873] Review Request: golang-github-openshift-go-systemd - Go bindings to systemd D-BUS APIs

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085873

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||golang-github-openshift-go-
   ||systemd-0-0.1.gitb71042d.el
   ||6
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2014-05-02 11:59:30



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-openshift-go-systemd-0-0.1.gitb71042d.el6 has been pushed to the
Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1085840] Review Request: golang-github-fsouza-go-dockerclient - Go Client for the Docker remote API

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085840

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||golang-github-fsouza-go-doc
   ||kerclient-0-0.1.gitd639515.
   ||el6
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2014-05-02 12:00:53



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-fsouza-go-dockerclient-0-0.1.gitd639515.el6 has been pushed to
the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1091636] Review Request: utf8cpp - A simple, portable and lightweight library for handling UTF-8 encoded strings

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091636

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
utf8cpp-2.3.4-4.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1086378] Review Request: geard - CLI client for installing Docker images as containers

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086378
Bug 1086378 depends on bug 1085840, which changed state.

Bug 1085840 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-fsouza-go-dockerclient - Go 
Client for the Docker remote API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085840

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1083962] Review Request: maxscale - A database-centric proxy that works with MariaDB and MySQL

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083962



--- Comment #15 from Paulo Andrade  
---
(In reply to Oden Eriksson from comment #13)
> I'm back.

  Sorry for the delay, did not reply earlier because I did want
to try to help and work a bit on it to help it getting fixed...

> There is nothing more I can do to the source code to make it conform to the
> requests made in this bugreport. The source surely needs good autopoo but
> for now there is none. It builds, it installs, it works, should be enough,
> no?

  I cannot confirm it works, %check (make testall) does not work
either :-)

  I started patching it a bit to get "make install" to work, but
it really is quite broken... starting with a simple:

%if %__isa_bits == 64
sed -i 's|\(libdir = \).*|\1%{_libdir}|' makefile.inc
%endif

I got past the first error I noticed in #12, but then, in
make install there are bad dependencies, so I started running
make install in subdirectories, at first "log_manager" and
"query_classifier", but the problem is that it fails to
link because it installs query_classifier stuff in
/home/pcpa/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/maxscale-0.5.0-1.fc21.x86_64/usr/lib64/maxscale/modules/
instead of
home/pcpa/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/maxscale-0.5.0-1.fc21.x86_64/usr/lib64/
and then fails to link; sample error message from where I stopped:

---%<---
libtool: install: (cd
/home/pcpa/rpmbuild/BUILD/maxscale-0.5.0/server/modules/routing/readwritesplit;
/bin/sh /usr/bin/libtool  --tag CC --mode=relink cc -c -fPIC -I/usr/include
-I../../include -I../../../include
-I/home/pcpa/rpmbuild/BUILD/maxscale-0.5.0/log_manager
-I/home/pcpa/rpmbuild/BUILD/maxscale-0.5.0/utils
-I/home/pcpa/rpmbuild/BUILD/maxscale-0.5.0/query_classifier
-I/usr/include/mysql/ -I/usr/include/mysql/private/ -I/usr/include/mysql/extra/
-Wall -g -Wall -fPIC -shared
-L/home/pcpa/rpmbuild/BUILD/maxscale-0.5.0/log_manager
-L/home/pcpa/rpmbuild/BUILD/maxscale-0.5.0/query_classifier -L/usr/lib64 -rpath
/usr/lib64/maxscale/modules -avoid-version -module -o libreadwritesplit.la
readwritesplit.o /home/pcpa/rpmbuild/BUILD/maxscale-0.5.0/utils/skygw_utils.o
-lssl -pthread -L/usr/lib64/mysql -lmysqld
/home/pcpa/rpmbuild/BUILD/maxscale-0.5.0/query_classifier/libquery_classifier.la
/home/pcpa/rpmbuild/BUILD/maxscale-0.5.0/log_manager/liblog_manager.la
-inst-prefix-dir /home/pcpa/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/maxscale-0.5.0-1.fc21.x86_64)

*** Warning: Linking the shared library libreadwritesplit.la against the
non-libtool
*** objects  readwritesplit.o
/home/pcpa/rpmbuild/BUILD/maxscale-0.5.0/utils/skygw_utils.o is not portable!
libtool: relink: gcc -shared  -fPIC -DPIC   readwritesplit.o
/home/pcpa/rpmbuild/BUILD/maxscale-0.5.0/utils/skygw_utils.o  
-L/home/pcpa/rpmbuild/BUILD/maxscale-0.5.0/log_manager
-L/home/pcpa/rpmbuild/BUILD/maxscale-0.5.0/query_classifier -L/usr/lib64 -lssl
-L/usr/lib64/mysql
-L/home/pcpa/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/maxscale-0.5.0-1.fc21.x86_64/usr/lib64
-lquery_classifier -lpthread -lmysqld -llog_manager  -pthread   -pthread
-Wl,-soname -Wl,libreadwritesplit.so -o .libs/libreadwritesplit.so
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lquery_classifier
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
---%<---

BTW, I also made a this quick/hacked patch to get a bit further in
%install:
---%<---
diff -up maxscale-0.5.0/query_classifier/query_classifier.cc.orig
maxscale-0.5.0/query_classifier/query_classifier.cc
--- maxscale-0.5.0/query_classifier/query_classifier.cc.orig2014-05-02
12:16:02.583431844 -0300
+++ maxscale-0.5.0/query_classifier/query_classifier.cc2014-05-02
12:19:05.693438856 -0300
@@ -35,21 +35,19 @@
 #include "../utils/skygw_debug.h"
 #include 

-#include 
-#include 
-#include 
-#include 
-#include 
-#include 
-#include 
-#include 
-#include 
-#include 
-#include 
-#include 
-#include 
-#include 
-#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 

 #include 

---%<---

as well as a quick/hacked patch to build_gateway.inc, i.e.

sed -i 's|$(HOME)||g' build_gateway.inc
sed -i "s|\(ROOT_PATH := \).*|\1$PWD|" build_gateway.inc
%if %__isa_bits == 32
sed -i 's|lib64|lib|g' build_gateway.inc
%endif

> $ cat /etc/redhat-release 
> Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.5 (Santiago)
> 
> $ rpm --eval %{__global_ldflags}
> %{__global_ldflags}
> 
> The intended target was RHEL6, RHEL7 and fedora+ using just one source rpm
> package. But, on RHEL6 I just realized it needs a newer mariadb version so I
> removed RHEL6 support from this package. I think when I worked with this I
> must have had the yum.mariadb.org mariadb packages installed. Heh.
> 
> New spec and src.rpm files up at the same location.

You should bump the release when asking for a new review.

For the moment, I am sorry but I cannot give a positive review if
"make install" and "make testall" are not patched to work.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes t

[Bug 1093410] Review Request: vdr-epg2vdr - A plugin to retrieve EPG data into the Video Disc Recorder

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093410

Mukundan Ragavan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||nonamed...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|nonamed...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1085441] Review Request: openstack-sahara - Apache Hadoop cluster management on OpenStack

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085441



--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System  ---
openstack-sahara-2014.1.0-7.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openstack-sahara-2014.1.0-7.fc20

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1093410] Review Request: vdr-epg2vdr - A plugin to retrieve EPG data into the Video Disc Recorder

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093410



--- Comment #3 from MartinKG  ---
Hi Mukundan,

you are welcome to do the review.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1093503] Review Request: lua-term - Terminal functions for Lua

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093503

Jamie Nguyen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||jamieli...@fedoraproject.or
   ||g
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jamieli...@fedoraproject.or
   ||g



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1087812] Review Request: gpaw - A grid-based real-space PAW method DFT code

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087812



--- Comment #17 from marcindulak  ---
I start addressing the problems. Can you make libxc available on el7.ppc64?
It also looks to me that *mpich2, scipy are not available on el6.ppc64, is
there an easy %if macro to say (not el6.ppc64)?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1093503] Review Request: lua-term - Terminal functions for Lua

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093503



--- Comment #2 from Jamie Nguyen  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
===
- Permissions on files are set properly.
  Note: See rpmlint output
  See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FilePermissions

Needs chmod 755.


[!]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
 attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.

Ignore.


[!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines

Please use commit hash for downloading the Source tarball:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Github


= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[!]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
 attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
 "Unknown or generated". 1 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
 licensecheck in /home/mockbuild/review/lua-term/licensecheck.txt
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 3 files.
[!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
 supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
 in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
 for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
 are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
 in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
 from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English language

[Bug 1089213] Review Request: openstack-trove - OpenStack DBaaS

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089213



--- Comment #2 from Pádraig Brady  ---
Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pbrady/openstack-trove.spec
SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pbrady/openstack-trove-2014.1-2.fc20.src.rpm
Description: OpenStack DBaaS (codename trove) provisioning service.
Fedora Account System Username: pbrady

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1093410] Review Request: vdr-epg2vdr - A plugin to retrieve EPG data into the Video Disc Recorder

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093410



--- Comment #4 from MartinKG  ---
Spec URL: http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/vdr-epg2vdr.spec
SRPM URL:
http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/vdr-epg2vdr-0.1.0-4.20130322git324f392.fc20.src.rpm

%changelog
* Fri May 02 2014 Martin Gansser  -
0.1.0-4.20130322git324f392
- Fix patch path
- Fix bogus date in %%changelog
- Fix comments

please note i've created further more 2 rpm packages for vdr.

VDR EPG Daemon plugin:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093407

epgd - a EPG daemon which fetch the EPG and additional data from various
sources (like epgdata, eplists.constabel.net, ...) and provide it to the
epg2vdr plugin via a MySQL database. The epgd get the EPG from the sources by
plugins. A plugin for epgdata is contained.

Scraper2VDR plugin:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093408

scraper2vdr acts as client and provides scraped metadata for tvshows and
movies from epgd to other plugins via its service interface. The plugin
cares about caching the images locally and also cleans up the images if
not longer needed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1093408] Review Request: vdr-scraper2vdr - A client plugin which provides scraped metadata from EPGD

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093408



--- Comment #2 from MartinKG  ---
Spec URL: http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/vdr-scraper2vdr.spec
SRPM URL:
http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/vdr-scraper2vdr-0.1.1-5.20140428git30008b3.fc20.src.rpm

%changelog
* Fri May 02 2014 Martin Gansser  -
0.1.1-5.20140428git30008b3
- Fix patch path
- Fix bogus date in %%changelog
- Fix comments

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1093503] Review Request: lua-term - Terminal functions for Lua

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093503



--- Comment #3 from Orion Poplawski  ---
(In reply to Jamie Nguyen from comment #2)
> Issues:
> ===
> - Permissions on files are set properly.
>   Note: See rpmlint output
>   See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FilePermissions
> 
> Needs chmod 755.


> [!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
> 
> Please use commit hash for downloading the Source tarball:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Github

Hmm, that's a pain, but I guess protects against tags changing.

> Rpmlint (installed packages)
> 
> # rpmlint lua-term
> lua-term.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
> /usr/lib64/lua/5.2/term/core.so 0775L

How did you end up with this permission?  My local builds and the koji builds
do not have it?  I've put a chmod in my spec, but this seems strange.

* Fri May 2 2014 Orion Poplawski  - 0.03-2
- Use git hash for source
- Fix .so permissions

Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/lua-term.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/lua-term-0.03-2.fc20.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1093503] Review Request: lua-term - Terminal functions for Lua

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093503



--- Comment #4 from Jamie Nguyen  ---
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #3)
> (In reply to Jamie Nguyen from comment #2)
> > # rpmlint lua-term
> > lua-term.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
> > /usr/lib64/lua/5.2/term/core.so 0775L
> 
> How did you end up with this permission?  My local builds and the koji
> builds do not have it?  I've put a chmod in my spec, but this seems strange.

Err, that's strange. I have no idea why/how my local mock builds would be
different here.


> * Fri May 2 2014 Orion Poplawski  - 0.03-2
> - Use git hash for source
> - Fix .so permissions
> 
> Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/lua-term.spec
> SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/lua-term-0.03-2.fc20.src.rpm


Rpmlint
---
Checking: lua-term-0.03-2.fc21.x86_64.rpm
  lua-term-0.03-2.fc21.src.rpm
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.


Rpmlint (installed packages)

# rpmlint lua-term
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.


$ rpm -qp --requires ./lua-term-0.03-2.fc21.x86_64.rpm 
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
lua(abi) >= 5.2
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rtld(GNU_HASH)
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1093503] Review Request: lua-term - Terminal functions for Lua

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093503



--- Comment #5 from Jamie Nguyen  ---
$ rpm -qp --requires ./lua-term-0.03-2.el6.x86_64.rpm 
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
lua < 5.1
lua >= 5.1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rtld(GNU_HASH)
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1

$ mock -r epel-6-x86_64 --install /tmp/lua-term-0.03-2.el6.x86_64.rpm
Error: Package: lua-term-0.03-2.el6.x86_64 (/lua-term-0.03-2.el6.x86_64)
   Requires: lua < 5.1
   Installed: lua-5.1.4-4.1.el6.x86_64 (@base)
   lua = 5.1
   lua = 5.1.4-4.1.el6
 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
 You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest

The Requires version is wrong for EL6. According to the guideline drafts [1],
you need this:

%global luanext 5.2
Requires: lua >= %{luaver}
Requires: lua <  %{luanext}

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Lua

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1087812] Review Request: gpaw - A grid-based real-space PAW method DFT code

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087812



--- Comment #18 from marcindulak  ---
What's your opinion about getting openblas on el7.x86_64?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1093503] Review Request: lua-term - Terminal functions for Lua

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093503



--- Comment #6 from Orion Poplawski  ---
Ah, shoot, fixed.

Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/lua-term.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/lua-term-0.03-3.fc20.src.rpm

* Fri May 2 2014 Orion Poplawski  - 0.03-3
- Fix EL6 lua requires

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1093503] Review Request: lua-term - Terminal functions for Lua

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093503

Jamie Nguyen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #7 from Jamie Nguyen  ---
Great. Package installs fine now in both rawhide and EL6.

Package approved!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1093503] Review Request: lua-term - Terminal functions for Lua

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093503

Orion Poplawski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #8 from Orion Poplawski  ---
Thanks for the thorough review!

New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: lua-term
Short Description: Terminal functions for Lua
Owners: orion
Branches: f19 f20 el6 epel7
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1092149] Review Request: dib-utils - Standalone parts of diskimage-builder

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092149

Ben Nemec  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #9 from Ben Nemec  ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: dib-utils
Short Description: Pieces of diskimage-builder that are useful standalone
Owners: bnemec slagle
Branches: f20 el6 epel7
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1092149] Review Request: dib-utils - Standalone parts of diskimage-builder

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092149



--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1092149] Review Request: dib-utils - Standalone parts of diskimage-builder

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092149

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1093503] Review Request: lua-term - Terminal functions for Lua

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093503

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1093503] Review Request: lua-term - Terminal functions for Lua

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093503



--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1062901] Review Request: openspecfun - Library providing a collection of special mathematical functions

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062901

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1062901] Review Request: openspecfun - Library providing a collection of special mathematical functions

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062901



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
openspecfun-0.3-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openspecfun-0.3-1.fc19

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1062901] Review Request: openspecfun - Library providing a collection of special mathematical functions

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062901



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
openspecfun-0.3-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openspecfun-0.3-1.fc20

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1085441] Review Request: openstack-sahara - Apache Hadoop cluster management on OpenStack

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085441



--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System  ---
openstack-sahara-2014.1.0-8.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openstack-sahara-2014.1.0-8.fc20

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1093503] Review Request: lua-term - Terminal functions for Lua

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093503

Orion Poplawski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2014-05-02 16:26:18



--- Comment #10 from Orion Poplawski  ---
Checked in and built.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1089409] Review Request: Lmod - Environmental Modules System in Lua

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089409
Bug 1089409 depends on bug 1093503, which changed state.

Bug 1093503 Summary: Review Request: lua-term - Terminal functions for Lua
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093503

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1076737] Review Request: ghc-reflection - Reifies arbitrary terms into types that can be reflected back into terms

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076737

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||ghc-reflection-1.4-1.fc20
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2014-05-02 16:56:22



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
ghc-reflection-1.4-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1085840] Review Request: golang-github-fsouza-go-dockerclient - Go Client for the Docker remote API

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085840

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|golang-github-fsouza-go-doc |golang-github-fsouza-go-doc
   |kerclient-0-0.1.gitd639515. |kerclient-0-0.1.gitd639515.
   |el6 |fc19



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-fsouza-go-dockerclient-0-0.1.gitd639515.fc19 has been pushed to
the Fedora 19 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1085019] Review Request: golang-github-kraman-libcontainer - Reference implementation for containers

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085019

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|golang-github-kraman-libcon |golang-github-kraman-libcon
   |tainer-0-0.1.gitd700e5b.el6 |tainer-0-0.1.gitd700e5b.fc1
   ||9



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-kraman-libcontainer-0-0.1.gitd700e5b.fc19 has been pushed to the
Fedora 19 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1084021] Review Request: openjpeg2 - C-Library for JPEG 2000

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084021

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||openjpeg2-2.0.0-5.fc20
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2014-05-02 16:57:50



--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System  ---
openjpeg2-2.0.0-5.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1085873] Review Request: golang-github-openshift-go-systemd - Go bindings to systemd D-BUS APIs

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085873

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|golang-github-openshift-go- |golang-github-openshift-go-
   |systemd-0-0.1.gitb71042d.el |systemd-0-0.2.gitb71042d.fc
   |6   |20



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-openshift-go-systemd-0-0.2.gitb71042d.fc20 has been pushed to the
Fedora 20 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it
in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 881590] Review Request: leveldbjni - A Java Native Interface to LevelDB

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881590
Bug 881590 depends on bug 881589, which changed state.

Bug 881589 Summary: Review Request: leveldb-java - Port of LevelDB to Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881589

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1069081] Review Request: ghc-HUnit - Unit testing framework for Haskell

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069081

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|ghc-HUnit-1.2.5.2-31.fc21   |ghc-async-2.0.1.4-30.fc20
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
ghc-async-2.0.1.4-30.fc20, ghc-html-1.0.1.2-28.fc20, ghc-HTTP-4000.2.8-32.fc20,
ghc-HUnit-1.2.5.2-31.fc20, ghc-network-2.4.1.2-31.fc20,
ghc-parsec-3.1.3-30.fc20, ghc-QuickCheck-2.6-32.fc20,
ghc-regex-base-0.93.2-28.fc20, ghc-regex-posix-0.95.2-29.fc20,
ghc-transformers-0.3.0.0-33.fc20, alex-3.0.5-36.fc20,
cabal-install-1.16.0.2-34.fc20, ghc-parallel-3.2.0.3-34.fc20,
ghc-regex-compat-0.95.1-34.fc20, ghc-syb-0.4.0-35.fc20, happy-1.18.10-34.fc20,
haskell-platform-2013.2.0.0-36.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1088950] Review Request: perl-MouseX-SimpleConfig - A Mouse role for setting attributes from a simple configfile

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1088950
Bug 1088950 depends on bug 1088946, which changed state.

Bug 1088946 Summary: Review Request: perl-MouseX-ConfigFromFile - An abstract 
Mouse role for setting attributes from a configfile
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1088946

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 881589] Review Request: leveldb-java - Port of LevelDB to Java

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881589

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||leveldb-java-0.7-1.fc20
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2014-05-02 16:58:15



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
leveldb-java-0.7-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1069070] Review Request: ghc-QuickCheck - Automatic testing of Haskell programs

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069070

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|ghc-QuickCheck-2.6-32.fc21  |ghc-async-2.0.1.4-30.fc20
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
ghc-async-2.0.1.4-30.fc20, ghc-html-1.0.1.2-28.fc20, ghc-HTTP-4000.2.8-32.fc20,
ghc-HUnit-1.2.5.2-31.fc20, ghc-network-2.4.1.2-31.fc20,
ghc-parsec-3.1.3-30.fc20, ghc-QuickCheck-2.6-32.fc20,
ghc-regex-base-0.93.2-28.fc20, ghc-regex-posix-0.95.2-29.fc20,
ghc-transformers-0.3.0.0-33.fc20, alex-3.0.5-36.fc20,
cabal-install-1.16.0.2-34.fc20, ghc-parallel-3.2.0.3-34.fc20,
ghc-regex-compat-0.95.1-34.fc20, ghc-syb-0.4.0-35.fc20, happy-1.18.10-34.fc20,
haskell-platform-2013.2.0.0-36.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1038087] Review Request: ghc-parsec - Monadic parser combinators

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038087

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||ghc-async-2.0.1.4-30.fc20
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
ghc-async-2.0.1.4-30.fc20, ghc-html-1.0.1.2-28.fc20, ghc-HTTP-4000.2.8-32.fc20,
ghc-HUnit-1.2.5.2-31.fc20, ghc-network-2.4.1.2-31.fc20,
ghc-parsec-3.1.3-30.fc20, ghc-QuickCheck-2.6-32.fc20,
ghc-regex-base-0.93.2-28.fc20, ghc-regex-posix-0.95.2-29.fc20,
ghc-transformers-0.3.0.0-33.fc20, alex-3.0.5-36.fc20,
cabal-install-1.16.0.2-34.fc20, ghc-parallel-3.2.0.3-34.fc20,
ghc-regex-compat-0.95.1-34.fc20, ghc-syb-0.4.0-35.fc20, happy-1.18.10-34.fc20,
haskell-platform-2013.2.0.0-36.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1089559] Review Request: tlp - Advanced power management tool for Linux

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089559

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
tlp-0.5-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1059942] Review Request: ghc-network - Network library

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059942

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|ghc-network-2.4.1.2-31.fc21 |ghc-async-2.0.1.4-30.fc20
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
ghc-async-2.0.1.4-30.fc20, ghc-html-1.0.1.2-28.fc20, ghc-HTTP-4000.2.8-32.fc20,
ghc-HUnit-1.2.5.2-31.fc20, ghc-network-2.4.1.2-31.fc20,
ghc-parsec-3.1.3-30.fc20, ghc-QuickCheck-2.6-32.fc20,
ghc-regex-base-0.93.2-28.fc20, ghc-regex-posix-0.95.2-29.fc20,
ghc-transformers-0.3.0.0-33.fc20, alex-3.0.5-36.fc20,
cabal-install-1.16.0.2-34.fc20, ghc-parallel-3.2.0.3-34.fc20,
ghc-regex-compat-0.95.1-34.fc20, ghc-syb-0.4.0-35.fc20, happy-1.18.10-34.fc20,
haskell-platform-2013.2.0.0-36.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1035543] Review Request: ghc-async - Asynchronous IO operations

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035543

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||ghc-async-2.0.1.4-30.fc20
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
ghc-async-2.0.1.4-30.fc20, ghc-html-1.0.1.2-28.fc20, ghc-HTTP-4000.2.8-32.fc20,
ghc-HUnit-1.2.5.2-31.fc20, ghc-network-2.4.1.2-31.fc20,
ghc-parsec-3.1.3-30.fc20, ghc-QuickCheck-2.6-32.fc20,
ghc-regex-base-0.93.2-28.fc20, ghc-regex-posix-0.95.2-29.fc20,
ghc-transformers-0.3.0.0-33.fc20, alex-3.0.5-36.fc20,
cabal-install-1.16.0.2-34.fc20, ghc-parallel-3.2.0.3-34.fc20,
ghc-regex-compat-0.95.1-34.fc20, ghc-syb-0.4.0-35.fc20, happy-1.18.10-34.fc20,
haskell-platform-2013.2.0.0-36.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1066346] Review Request: ghc-HTTP - A library for client-side HTTP

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066346

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|ghc-HTTP-4000.2.8-32.fc21   |ghc-async-2.0.1.4-30.fc20
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
ghc-async-2.0.1.4-30.fc20, ghc-html-1.0.1.2-28.fc20, ghc-HTTP-4000.2.8-32.fc20,
ghc-HUnit-1.2.5.2-31.fc20, ghc-network-2.4.1.2-31.fc20,
ghc-parsec-3.1.3-30.fc20, ghc-QuickCheck-2.6-32.fc20,
ghc-regex-base-0.93.2-28.fc20, ghc-regex-posix-0.95.2-29.fc20,
ghc-transformers-0.3.0.0-33.fc20, alex-3.0.5-36.fc20,
cabal-install-1.16.0.2-34.fc20, ghc-parallel-3.2.0.3-34.fc20,
ghc-regex-compat-0.95.1-34.fc20, ghc-syb-0.4.0-35.fc20, happy-1.18.10-34.fc20,
haskell-platform-2013.2.0.0-36.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1088946] Review Request: perl-MouseX-ConfigFromFile - An abstract Mouse role for setting attributes from a configfile

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1088946

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-MouseX-ConfigFromFile-
   ||0.05-3.fc20
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2014-05-02 16:58:29



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-MouseX-ConfigFromFile-0.05-3.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1047746] Review Request: ghc-html - HTML combinator library

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047746

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||ghc-async-2.0.1.4-30.fc20
 Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE  |ERRATA



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
ghc-async-2.0.1.4-30.fc20, ghc-html-1.0.1.2-28.fc20, ghc-HTTP-4000.2.8-32.fc20,
ghc-HUnit-1.2.5.2-31.fc20, ghc-network-2.4.1.2-31.fc20,
ghc-parsec-3.1.3-30.fc20, ghc-QuickCheck-2.6-32.fc20,
ghc-regex-base-0.93.2-28.fc20, ghc-regex-posix-0.95.2-29.fc20,
ghc-transformers-0.3.0.0-33.fc20, alex-3.0.5-36.fc20,
cabal-install-1.16.0.2-34.fc20, ghc-parallel-3.2.0.3-34.fc20,
ghc-regex-compat-0.95.1-34.fc20, ghc-syb-0.4.0-35.fc20, happy-1.18.10-34.fc20,
haskell-platform-2013.2.0.0-36.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1086652] Review Request: alex - Tool for generating lexical analysers in Haskell

2014-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086652

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|alex-3.0.5-35.fc21  |ghc-async-2.0.1.4-30.fc20
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2014-05-02 16:59:24



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
ghc-async-2.0.1.4-30.fc20, ghc-html-1.0.1.2-28.fc20, ghc-HTTP-4000.2.8-32.fc20,
ghc-HUnit-1.2.5.2-31.fc20, ghc-network-2.4.1.2-31.fc20,
ghc-parsec-3.1.3-30.fc20, ghc-QuickCheck-2.6-32.fc20,
ghc-regex-base-0.93.2-28.fc20, ghc-regex-posix-0.95.2-29.fc20,
ghc-transformers-0.3.0.0-33.fc20, alex-3.0.5-36.fc20,
cabal-install-1.16.0.2-34.fc20, ghc-parallel-3.2.0.3-34.fc20,
ghc-regex-compat-0.95.1-34.fc20, ghc-syb-0.4.0-35.fc20, happy-1.18.10-34.fc20,
haskell-platform-2013.2.0.0-36.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

  1   2   >