[Bug 1082474] Review Request: gimp-wavelet-denoise-plugin - A plugin for GIMP allows to reduce noise in each channel of an image separately
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082474 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- gimp-wavelet-denoise-plugin-0.3.1-4.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gimp-wavelet-denoise-plugin-0.3.1-4.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058587] Review Request: drawpile - A collaborative drawing program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058587 Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||NotReady --- Comment #6 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me --- Inquiry: https://github.com/callaa/Drawpile/issues/51 I will wait 0.9.0 release. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058019] Review Request: utf8proc - Library for processing UTF-8 encoded Unicode strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058019 --- Comment #13 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- Well, I have no experience with Ruby nor PostgreSQL, so I can build these files, but I have no idea where to put them and how to test them... I guess I would put them into separate packages? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 970956] Review Request: clens - A convenience library to aid in porting code from OpenBSD
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970956 --- Comment #19 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info --- 1) For what that trick: cat EOF configure #!/bin/bash EOF chmod +x configure %configure ? Just drop that lines - it looks like a garbage. 2) Some files under BSD (2 or 3 clause) and some under ISC. Why you set ISC as license field for package? I think it should be BSD and ISC. 3) Shouldn't be it called libclens instead clens? 4) Honestly I've first time review static library. Be aware what according to guideline https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Statically_Linking_Executables you must need citing The packager must provide rationale for linking statically, including precedences where available, to FESCO for approval. So, as it packaged as dependency to mg (bz#1010897) i strongly encourage you firstly request that exception to do not make useless effort. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 970956] Review Request: clens - A convenience library to aid in porting code from OpenBSD
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970956 --- Comment #20 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me --- (In reply to Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) from comment #19) 1) For what that trick: cat EOF configure #!/bin/bash EOF chmod +x configure %configure ? Just drop that lines - it looks like a garbage. I used to agree with you... But I need to set the building flags properly. 2) Some files under BSD (2 or 3 clause) and some under ISC. Why you set ISC as license field for package? I think it should be BSD and ISC. Please paste the license check results if possible, this package is ISC licensed described in README.md. 3) Shouldn't be it called libclens instead clens? No, I insist on naming it based on the tarball name. 4) Honestly I've first time review static library. Be aware what according to guideline https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging: Guidelines#Statically_Linking_Executables you must need citing The packager must provide rationale for linking statically, including precedences where available, to FESCO for approval. So, as it packaged as dependency to mg (bz#1010897) i strongly encourage you firstly request that exception to do not make useless effort. That's for Statically Linking Executables, means those linked with static libraries, but not static libraries itself. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094038] Review Request: expat21 - An XML parser library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094038
--- Comment #6 from Christian Dersch chrisder...@gmail.com ---
Review done, looks fine :)
Greetings,
Christian
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- EPEL5: Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
- EPEL5: Package does run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
MIT/X11 (BSD like), GPL (v2 or later), Unknown or generated. 51
files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/rpmbuild/1094038-expat21/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 174080 bytes in 11 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: EPEL5 requires explicit %clean with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Buildroot is not present
Note: Missing buildroot (required for EPEL5)
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
expat21-devel
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files
[Bug 1094038] Review Request: expat21 - An XML parser library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094038 Christian Dersch chrisder...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094057] Review Request: libes - Managing an entity system in C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094057 --- Comment #4 from Pierre Marijon pie...@marijon.fr --- I follow your recommendation Spec URL: http://static.pierre.marijon.fr/rpm/libes/libes.spec.0.2 SRPM URL: http://static.pierre.marijon.fr/rpm/libes/libes-0.5.2-0.2.fc20.src.rpm fedora-review for 0.2 : http://static.pierre.marijon.fr/rpm/libes/review.txt.0.2 koji link : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6813416 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094038] Review Request: expat21 - An XML parser library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094038
--- Comment #7 from Christian Dersch chrisder...@gmail.com ---
Forgot to comment:
Issues:
===
- EPEL5: Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
- EPEL5: Package does run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
= The spec contains the lines
%{?el5:%clean}
%{?el5:rm -rf %{buildroot}}
= Should be fine
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 970956] Review Request: clens - A convenience library to aid in porting code from OpenBSD
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970956
--- Comment #21 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info
---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #20)
(In reply to Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) from comment #19)
1) For what that trick:
cat EOF configure
#!/bin/bash
EOF
chmod +x configure
%configure
?
Just drop that lines - it looks like a garbage.
I used to agree with you... But I need to set the building flags properly.
Sure.
You may just export those env variables like:
CFLAGS=${CFLAGS:-%optflags} ; export CFLAGS ;
CXXFLAGS=${CXXFLAGS:-%optflags} ; export CXXFLAGS ;
LDFLAGS=${LDFLAGS:-%__global_ldflags}; export LDFLAGS;
Meantime it only c language, so:
make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS=${CFLAGS:-%optflags}
LDFLAGS=${LDFLAGS:-%__global_ldflags}
should be full enough.
2) Some files under BSD (2 or 3 clause) and some under ISC. Why you set ISC
as license field for package? I think it should be BSD and ISC.
Please paste the license check results if possible, this package is ISC
licensed described in README.md.
BSD (2 clause)
--
clens-0.7.0/include/clens/sys/tree.h
BSD (3 clause)
--
clens-0.7.0/include/clens/glob.h
clens-0.7.0/include/clens/sys/queue.h
BSD (3 clause) ISC
--
clens-0.7.0/src/fgetln.c
clens-0.7.0/src/fmt_scaled.c
clens-0.7.0/src/glob.c
BSD (4 clause) ISC
--
clens-0.7.0/src/fparseln.c
ISC
---
clens-0.7.0/config/freebsd/build-pkg.sh
clens-0.7.0/config/prep_release.sh
clens-0.7.0/include/clens/clens.h
clens-0.7.0/include/clens/readpassphrase.h
clens-0.7.0/src/arc4random_buf.c
clens-0.7.0/src/arc4random_uniform.c
clens-0.7.0/src/clens.c
clens-0.7.0/src/strlcat.c
clens-0.7.0/src/strlcpy.c
clens-0.7.0/src/strtonum.c
clens-0.7.0/version.sh
Unknown or generated
clens-0.7.0/buildver.sh
Is not it available for you??
4) Honestly I've first time review static library. Be aware what according
to guideline
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:
Guidelines#Statically_Linking_Executables you must need citing The packager
must provide rationale for linking statically, including precedences where
available, to FESCO for approval.
So, as it packaged as dependency to mg (bz#1010897) i strongly encourage you
firstly request that exception to do not make useless effort.
That's for Statically Linking Executables, means those linked with static
libraries, but not static libraries itself.
Yes, there I mention mg. It will be intended to be linked with clens
statically. You must request it exception from FESCO. Otherwise it have no
sense to packaging that static lib.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1089213] Review Request: openstack-trove - OpenStack DBaaS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089213 Alan Pevec ape...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ape...@redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Alan Pevec ape...@redhat.com --- I had question re. pexpect in rhel7, here is the answer for the record: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976504#c6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093407] Review Request: vdr-epg-daemon - A daemon to download EPG data from the internet and manage it in a mysql database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093407
--- Comment #7 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
Spec URL: http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/vdr-epg-daemon.spec
SRPM URL:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/7nhvgk41kfiideh/vdr-epg-daemon-0.1.0-6.20140505gitd7fb6ca.fc20.src.rpm
%changelog
* Mon May 05 2014 Martin Gansser marti...@fedoraproject.org -
0.1.0-6.20140505gitd7fb6ca
- rebuild for new git release
- replaced hardlinks by macro in %%prep section
- Fixed the License tag
- added %%dir %%{_libdir}/epgd because it's owned by the package
- added BR mariadb-server
- added BR systemd-units
- added comment about upstream patch
- added fedora optflags to Make.config
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086448] Review Request: kf5-attica - KDE Frameworks Tier 1 Addon with implementation of the Open Collaboration Services API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086448 --- Comment #2 from Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com --- Spec URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-attica.spec SRPM URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-attica-4.98.0-2.fc20.src.rpm - shortened summary a bit - removed Provides, Obsoletes - they were introduced in kde-frameworks Copr repo, but are not needed in Fedora -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001008] Review Request: CImg - C++ Template Image Processing Toolkit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001008 --- Comment #7 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me --- I figured out that CMake only finds -lfftw3, without fftw3_threads the linking process will not be finished. SPEC URL: http://misc.cicku.me/fedora/CImg.spec SRPM URL: http://misc.cicku.me/fedora/CImg-1.5.8-1.fc21.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086448] Review Request: kf5-attica - KDE Frameworks Tier 1 Addon with implementation of the Open Collaboration Services API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086448 Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com --- Approved, now it looks okay to me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094194] New: Review Request: liblogging - An easy to use logging library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094194 Bug ID: 1094194 Summary: Review Request: liblogging - An easy to use logging library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: thein...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~theinric/liblogging/liblogging.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~theinric/liblogging/liblogging-1.0.4-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: liblogging is a collection of several components. The liblogging-stdlog component can be viewed as an enhanced version of the syslog(3) API. It retains the easy semantics, but makes the API more sophisticated behind the scenes with better support for multiple threads and flexibility for different log destinations (e.g. syslog and systemd journal). This package is a prerequisite for newer versions of rsyslog. Fedora Account System Username: theinric -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1088283] Review Request: python-cassandra-driver - DataStax Python Driver for Apache Cassandra
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1088283 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk --- Thank you. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-cassandra-driver Short Description: DataStax Python Driver for Apache Cassandra Owners: lkundrak filabrazilska Branches: f19 f20 el6 epel7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094038] Review Request: expat21 - An XML parser library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094038 Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC|package-review@lists.fedora | |project.org | Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com --- Many thanks for the review, Christian! :D # New Package SCM Request === Package Name: expat21 Short Description: An XML parser library Owners: besser82 lupinix Branches: el5 el6 InitialCC: This compat-pkg is needed for a possible backport-effort of Python3 to EPEL 5 6, only. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094194] Review Request: liblogging - An easy to use logging library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094194 Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tm...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com --- It seems this first version contain only a single subpackage. And there is no main package. Perhaps the description should be changed appropriately? Or will another subpackages follow soon? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 445455] Review Request: xdotool - Fake keyboard/mouse input
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445455 Nikos Roussos comzer...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||comzer...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #8 from Nikos Roussos comzer...@fedoraproject.org --- Package Change Request == Package Name: xdotool New Branches: el6 Owners: comzeradd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1065641] Review Request: libhttpserver - Library embedding RESTful HTTP server functionality
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065641 Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me --- PACKAGE APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1065490] Review Request: perl-BSSolv - A new approach to package dependency solving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065490 Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-05-05 06:13:36 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094214] New: Review Request: rubygem-pdf-core - PDF::Core is used by Prawn to render PDF documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094214 Bug ID: 1094214 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-pdf-core - PDF::Core is used by Prawn to render PDF documents Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jstri...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://data-strzibny.rhcloud.com/rubygem-pdf-core.spec SRPM URL: http://data-strzibny.rhcloud.com/rubygem-pdf-core-0.2.5-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: PDF::Core is used by Prawn to render PDF documents Fedora Account System Username: jstribny This package is needed to package final 1.0.0 version of Prawn. You would need an updated version of rubygem-pdf-inspector to build/test it[1]. I haven't updated it yet, because it would break current rc2 version of Prawn. I will do the update when the package is approved and then update Prawn as well. [1] http://data-strzibny.rhcloud.com/rubygem-pdf-inspector-1.1.0-1.fc21.noarch.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1071163] Review Request: moarvm - Short for Metamodel On A Runtime, MoarVM is a virtual machine as a backend for NQP and then Rakudo Perl 6 at the top.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071163
--- Comment #13 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
1. Why O3 still? (CFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -fPIC -O3)
2. I strongly suggest that hack the env parameters before configure or use
configure to set the flags(if possible, I can see --optimize=3 which can be
modified, not sure about others) so we can see these parameters in the welcome
message. As far as we can see from the build.log, these options are still kept
as-is:
make: make
compile: gcc -O3 -DNDEBUG -D_REENTRANT -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -fPIC
link: gcc -O3 -DNDEBUG -Wl,-rpath,$(PREFIX)/lib
libs: -luv -lsha -lreadline -lm -lpthread -lrt -ldl -ltommath
And if you really ask me to see if it really works or not, I'm afraid I can't
as I can only see these:
compiling xxx...
linking xxx...
So I can't tell you whether the debuginfo package are generated for our needs.
3. %ifarch x86_64
Does this package support ppc64? If so you should no use ifarch to judge lib or
lib64, but use sth like %{_lib} != lib.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 970956] Review Request: clens - A convenience library to aid in porting code from OpenBSD
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970956 --- Comment #22 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net --- cat EOF configure #!/bin/bash EOF chmod +x configure %configure There have been various forms of that over the years. One other is: %configure || : You must request it exception from FESCO. You are misreading the guidelines. What you refer to is the case where a packager wants to link statically when a library is available _both_ as a shared and static build. Then it must be justified why the shared lib is not linked with instead. On the contrary, for a static-only library this one applies: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Programs_which_don.27t_need_to_notify_FESCo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093987] Review Request: python3-opengl - OpenGL bindings for Python3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093987
Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamieli...@fedoraproject.or
||g
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--- Comment #3 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org ---
I've added Blocks: FE-NEEDSPONSOR as you need a sponsor.
Have you reached out to the PyOpenGL maintainers to see if they plan to build a
python3 subpackage? Since the python2 and python3 versions of PyOpenGL are
build from the same source tarball, it would make sense for both sets of
packages to be built from the same SRPM. There is more advice about this on the
Python Packaging Guidelines.
The official packaging Guidelines to browse for information:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python
Issues:
===
You can run rpmlint on your SRPM to see outstanding issues:
$ rpmlint python3-opengl-3.0.2-1.1.src.rpm
python3-opengl.src: W: non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Python
python3-opengl.src: W: invalid-license BSD-3-Clause
python3-opengl.src:42: W: macro-in-comment %{py_requires}
python3-opengl.src:47: W: macro-in-comment %else
python3-opengl.src:49: W: macro-in-comment %endif
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
1) non-standard-group
Use a valid group from /usr/share/doc/rpm/GROUPS
2) invalid-license
You should use the appropriate License tag from the following list:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Good_Licenses
3) macro-in-comment
$ rpmlint -I macro-in-comment
macro-in-comment:
There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros
are expanded everywhere, so check if it can cause a problem in this case and
escape the macro with another leading % if appropriate.
I also see some opensuse macros that don't need to be there.
4) Python Packaging Guidelines
We have a great page on the guidelines for python packages. Please use the
appropriate macros:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python
5) I assume you don't plan to build this for EL6, so please remove any
redundant macros:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25clean
6) Please use an appropriate changelog format.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Changelogs
7) The PyOpenGL package has the Tk widget support put into a subpackage. Have
you considered the same?
8) Consider using DistTag in the Release tag:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:DistTag#.25.7Bdist.7D_in_the_Release:_field
9) Why does the Release tag start at 1.1? Probably should just be 1.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093987] Review Request: python3-opengl - OpenGL bindings for Python3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093987 Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||i...@cicku.me Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed||2014-05-05 06:49:13 --- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me --- It's better to create it in one package, yes pyopengl has received the request. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1086438 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094258] New: Review Request: perl-Devel-FindPerl - Find the path to the current Perl interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094258 Bug ID: 1094258 Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-FindPerl - Find the path to the current Perl interpreter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Devel-FindPerl/perl-Devel-FindPerl.spec SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Devel-FindPerl/perl-Devel-FindPerl-0.012-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: This module tries to find the path to the currently running perl. Fedora Account System Username: ppisar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094261] Review Request: perl-Module-Path - Get the full path to a locally installed module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094261 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1094258 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094258 [Bug 1094258] Review Request: perl-Devel-FindPerl - Find the path to the current Perl interpreter -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094261] New: Review Request: perl-Module-Path - Get the full path to a locally installed module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094261 Bug ID: 1094261 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Path - Get the full path to a locally installed module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Module-Path/perl-Module-Path.spec SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Module-Path/perl-Module-Path-0.13-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: This Module::Path Perl module provides a single function, module_path(), which will find where a module is installed locally. Fedora Account System Username: ppisar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094258] Review Request: perl-Devel-FindPerl - Find the path to the current Perl interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094258 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1094261 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094261 [Bug 1094261] Review Request: perl-Module-Path - Get the full path to a locally installed module -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 816124] Review Request: libdb4 - Oracle (Berkeley) DB package 4.x.x series
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816124 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 816124] Review Request: libdb4 - Oracle (Berkeley) DB package 4.x.x series
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816124 --- Comment #48 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1088283] Review Request: python-cassandra-driver - DataStax Python Driver for Apache Cassandra
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1088283 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1088283] Review Request: python-cassandra-driver - DataStax Python Driver for Apache Cassandra
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1088283 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093186] Review Request: puppet-gluster - A puppet module for GlusterFS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093186 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093186] Review Request: puppet-gluster - A puppet module for GlusterFS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093186 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093408] Review Request: vdr-scraper2vdr - A client plugin which provides scraped metadata from EPGD to other plugins
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093408 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093408] Review Request: vdr-scraper2vdr - A client plugin which provides scraped metadata from EPGD to other plugins
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093408 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093930] Review Request: php-phpunit-comparator - Compare PHP values for equality
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093930 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093930] Review Request: php-phpunit-comparator - Compare PHP values for equality
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093930 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094038] Review Request: expat21 - An XML parser library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094038 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094038] Review Request: expat21 - An XML parser library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094038 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094261] Review Request: perl-Module-Path - Get the full path to a locally installed module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094261 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1094283 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094283 [Bug 1094283] 1.019 version is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1065610] Review Request: mandelbulber - Advanced 3D fractal generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065610 Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(i...@cicku.me) | --- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me --- Thanks for the review. 1. Mimetype rpmlint warning can be safely ignored. 2. License problem is not a problem actually, it's a typo. Quoted from upstream reply: Hi I have substituted src/clew.cpp file with the file which contains following header: // // Copyright (c) 2009 Organic Vectory B.V. // Written by George van Venrooij // // Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0. //(See accompanying file LICENSE_1_0.txt or copy at // http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt) // It links now to the license file witch is on boost.org website Actual source package is here: https://sourceforge.net/projects/mandelbulber/files/mandelbulber1.21-1.orig.tar.gz/download Best regards Krzysztof Upstream had updated the source file since he received the report from me. 3. I'd like to leave those underneath %_datadir intact. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1065281] Review Request: xnbd - Yet another NBD (Network Block Device) server program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065281 --- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me --- Spec URL: http://misc.cicku.me/fedora/xnbd.spec SRPM URL: http://misc.cicku.me/fedora/xnbd-0.3.0-1.fc21.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094289] New: Review Request: perl-Term-Encoding - Detect encoding of the current terminal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094289 Bug ID: 1094289 Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-Encoding - Detect encoding of the current terminal Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Term-Encoding/perl-Term-Encoding.spec SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Term-Encoding/perl-Term-Encoding-0.02-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: Term::Encoding is a simple Perl module to detect an encoding the current terminal expects, in various ways. Fedora Account System Username: ppisar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094289] Review Request: perl-Term-Encoding - Detect encoding of the current terminal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094289 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1085211 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085211 [Bug 1085211] perl-Dist-Zilla-4.300023-4.fc21 FTBFS -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093407] Review Request: vdr-epg-daemon - A daemon to download EPG data from the internet and manage it in a mysql database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093407 --- Comment #8 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com --- (In reply to MartinKG from comment #7) Spec URL: http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/vdr-epg-daemon.spec This file has not been updated. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086448] Review Request: kf5-attica - KDE Frameworks Tier 1 Addon with implementation of the Open Collaboration Services API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086448 Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: kf5-attica Short Description: KDE Frameworks Tier 1 Addon with Open Collaboration Services API Owners: dvratil ltinkl rdieter kkofler jgrulich Branches: InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094038] Review Request: expat21 - An XML parser library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094038 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- expat21-2.1.0-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/expat21-2.1.0-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094038] Review Request: expat21 - An XML parser library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094038 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094038] Review Request: expat21 - An XML parser library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094038 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- expat21-2.1.0-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/expat21-2.1.0-1.el5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 783016] Review Request: pilas - A simple to use video game framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783016 --- Comment #36 from Rino Rondan villadalm...@gmail.com --- Hi, I want to help with this package as co-maintainer because im working with Valentin in Icaro Project that he develop this application that use pilas-engine and he has contact with the developer of pilas-engine, so sometime valentin detect or need new features from the latest pilas-engine version of Fedora. What do you think about be part of maintainer of this package with you Andres, and what do you think Eduardo. Regards -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093930] Review Request: php-phpunit-comparator - Compare PHP values for equality
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093930 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-phpunit-comparator-1.0.0-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-phpunit-comparator-1.0.0-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093930] Review Request: php-phpunit-comparator - Compare PHP values for equality
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093930 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093930] Review Request: php-phpunit-comparator - Compare PHP values for equality
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093930 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-phpunit-comparator-1.0.0-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-phpunit-comparator-1.0.0-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094320] New: Review Request: kf5-karchive - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon with archive functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094320 Bug ID: 1094320 Summary: Review Request: kf5-karchive - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon with archive functions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dvra...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-karchive.spec SRPM URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-karchive-4.99.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon with archive functions not available in Qt, like zlib, bzip2 and lzma compression and (de-)compressing of data streams Fedora Account System Username: dvratil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094320] Review Request: kf5-karchive - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon with archive functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094320 Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews), ||1086148 (kf5) Alias||kf5-karchive Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656997 [Bug 656997] kde-related package review tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086148 [Bug 1086148] KDE Frameworks 5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094323] New: Review Request: kf5-kcodecs - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon with string manipulation methods
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094323 Bug ID: 1094323 Summary: Review Request: kf5-kcodecs - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon with string manipulation methods Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dvra...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-kcodecs.spec SRPM URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-kcodecs-4.99.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon with string manipulation methods. Fedora Account System Username: dvratil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093407] Review Request: vdr-epg-daemon - A daemon to download EPG data from the internet and manage it in a mysql database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093407
--- Comment #9 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #8)
(In reply to MartinKG from comment #7)
Spec URL: http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/vdr-epg-daemon.spec
This file has not been updated.
Sorry for copy/paste the wrong link.
Spec URL: https://www.dropbox.com/s/u05hbq6jhgsx41n/vdr-epg-daemon.spec
SRPM URL:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/7nhvgk41kfiideh/vdr-epg-daemon-0.1.0-6.20140505gitd7fb6ca.fc20.src.rpm
%changelog
* Mon May 05 2014 Martin Gansser marti...@fedoraproject.org -
0.1.0-6.20140505gitd7fb6ca
- rebuild for new git release
- replaced hardlinks by macro in %%prep section
- Fixed the License tag
- added %%dir %%{_libdir}/epgd because it's owned by the package
- added BR mariadb-server
- added BR systemd-units
- added comment about upstream patch
- added fedora optflags to Make.config
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094323] Review Request: kf5-kcodecs - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon with string manipulation methods
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094323 Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews), ||1086148 (kf5) Alias||kf5-kcodecs Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656997 [Bug 656997] kde-related package review tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086148 [Bug 1086148] KDE Frameworks 5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094325] New: Review Request: kf5-kconfig - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon with advanced configuration system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094325 Bug ID: 1094325 Summary: Review Request: kf5-kconfig - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon with advanced configuration system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dvra...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-kconfig.spec SRPM URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-kconfig-4.99.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon with advanced configuration system made of two parts: KConfigCore and KConfigGui. Fedora Account System Username: dvratil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086448] Review Request: kf5-attica - KDE Frameworks Tier 1 Addon with implementation of the Open Collaboration Services API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086448 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086448] Review Request: kf5-attica - KDE Frameworks Tier 1 Addon with implementation of the Open Collaboration Services API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086448 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093640] Review Request: perl-Protocol-WebSocket - WebSocket protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093640 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094325] Review Request: kf5-kconfig - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon with advanced configuration system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094325 Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews), ||1086148 (kf5) Alias||kf5-kconfig Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656997 [Bug 656997] kde-related package review tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086148 [Bug 1086148] KDE Frameworks 5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094329] New: Review Request: kf5-kcoreaddons - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon with various classes on top of QtCore
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094329 Bug ID: 1094329 Summary: Review Request: kf5-kcoreaddons - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon with various classes on top of QtCore Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dvra...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-kcoreaddons.spec SRPM URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-kcoreaddons-4.99.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: KCoreAddons provides classes built on top of QtCore to perform various tasks such as manipulating mime types, autosaving files, creating backup files, generating random sequences, performing text manipulations such as macro replacement, accessing user information and many more. Fedora Account System Username: dvratil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094329] Review Request: kf5-kcoreaddons - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon with various classes on top of QtCore
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094329 Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews), ||1086148 (kf5) Alias||kf5-kcoreaddons Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656997 [Bug 656997] kde-related package review tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086148 [Bug 1086148] KDE Frameworks 5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094331] New: Review Request: kf5-kdbusaddons - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon with various classes on top of QtDBus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094331 Bug ID: 1094331 Summary: Review Request: kf5-kdbusaddons - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon with various classes on top of QtDBus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dvra...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-kdbusaddons.spec SRPM URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-kdbusaddons-4.99.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: KDBusAddons provides convenience classes on top of QtDBus, as well as an API to create KDED modules. Fedora Account System Username: dvratil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094331] Review Request: kf5-kdbusaddons - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon with various classes on top of QtDBus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094331 Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews), ||1086148 (kf5) Alias||kf5-kdbusaddons Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656997 [Bug 656997] kde-related package review tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086148 [Bug 1086148] KDE Frameworks 5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094332] New: Review Request: kf5-kglobalaccel - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 integration module for global shortcuts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094332 Bug ID: 1094332 Summary: Review Request: kf5-kglobalaccel - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 integration module for global shortcuts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dvra...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-kglobalaccel.spec SRPM URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-kglobalaccel-4.99.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: KDE Framework 5 Tier 1 integration module for global shortcuts Fedora Account System Username: dvratil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094332] Review Request: kf5-kglobalaccel - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 integration module for global shortcuts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094332 Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews), ||1086148 (kf5) Alias||kf5-kglobalaccel Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656997 [Bug 656997] kde-related package review tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086148 [Bug 1086148] KDE Frameworks 5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094333] New: Review Request: kf5-kguiaddons - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon with various classes on top of QtGui
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094333 Bug ID: 1094333 Summary: Review Request: kf5-kguiaddons - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon with various classes on top of QtGui Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dvra...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-kguiaddons.spec SRPM URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-kguiaddons-4.99.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: KGuiAddons provides convenience classes on top of QtGui. Fedora Account System Username: dvratil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094333] Review Request: kf5-kguiaddons - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon with various classes on top of QtGui
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094333 Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews), ||1086148 (kf5) Alias||kf5-kguiaddons Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656997 [Bug 656997] kde-related package review tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086148 [Bug 1086148] KDE Frameworks 5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094335] New: Review Request: kf5-ki18n - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon for localization
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094335 Bug ID: 1094335 Summary: Review Request: kf5-ki18n - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon for localization Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dvra...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-ki18n.spec SRPM URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-ki18n-4.99.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon for localization Fedora Account System Username: dvratil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094335] Review Request: kf5-ki18n - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon for localization
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094335 Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews), ||1086148 (kf5) Alias||kf5-ki18n Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656997 [Bug 656997] kde-related package review tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086148 [Bug 1086148] KDE Frameworks 5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093410] Review Request: vdr-epg2vdr - A plugin to retrieve EPG data from a mysql database into VDR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093410
Mukundan Ragavan nonamed...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Mukundan Ragavan nonamed...@gmail.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
Unknown or generated. 15 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/mukundan/personal/pkgs/reviews/1093410-vdr-
epg2vdr/licensecheck.txt
--- This looks fine to me.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6814388
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve
[Bug 1094337] New: Review Request: kf5-kidletime - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 integration module for idle time detection
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094337 Bug ID: 1094337 Summary: Review Request: kf5-kidletime - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 integration module for idle time detection Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dvra...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-kidletime.spec SRPM URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-kidletime-4.99.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 integration module for idle time detection. Fedora Account System Username: dvratil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093186] Review Request: puppet-gluster - A puppet module for GlusterFS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093186 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- puppet-gluster-0.0.2-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/puppet-gluster-0.0.2-2.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093186] Review Request: puppet-gluster - A puppet module for GlusterFS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093186 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093186] Review Request: puppet-gluster - A puppet module for GlusterFS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093186 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- puppet-gluster-0.0.2-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/puppet-gluster-0.0.2-2.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094337] Review Request: kf5-kidletime - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 integration module for idle time detection
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094337 Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews), ||1086148 (kf5) Alias||kf5-kidletime Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656997 [Bug 656997] kde-related package review tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086148 [Bug 1086148] KDE Frameworks 5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094341] New: Review Request: kf5-kimageformats - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon with additional image plugins for QtGui
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094341 Bug ID: 1094341 Summary: Review Request: kf5-kimageformats - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon with additional image plugins for QtGui Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dvra...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-kimageformats.spec SRPM URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-kimageformats-4.99.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: This framework provides additional image format plugins for QtGui. As such it is not required for the compilation of any other software, but may be a runtime requirement for Qt-based software to support certain image formats. Fedora Account System Username: dvratil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094341] Review Request: kf5-kimageformats - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon with additional image plugins for QtGui
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094341 Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews), ||1086148 (kf5) Alias||kf5-kimageformats Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656997 [Bug 656997] kde-related package review tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086148 [Bug 1086148] KDE Frameworks 5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094342] Review Request: kf5-kitemmodels - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon with item models
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094342 Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews), ||1086148 (kf5) Alias||kf5-kitemmodels Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656997 [Bug 656997] kde-related package review tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086148 [Bug 1086148] KDE Frameworks 5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094342] New: Review Request: kf5-kitemmodels - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon with item models
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094342 Bug ID: 1094342 Summary: Review Request: kf5-kitemmodels - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon with item models Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dvra...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-kitemmodels.spec SRPM URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-kitemmodels-4.99.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon with item models. Fedora Account System Username: dvratil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094343] New: Review Request: kf5-kitemviews - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon with item views
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094343 Bug ID: 1094343 Summary: Review Request: kf5-kitemviews - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon with item views Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dvra...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-kitemviews.spec SRPM URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-kitemviews-4.99.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon with item views. Fedora Account System Username: dvratil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094343] Review Request: kf5-kitemviews - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon with item views
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094343 Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews), ||1086148 (kf5) Alias||kf5-kitemviews Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656997 [Bug 656997] kde-related package review tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086148 [Bug 1086148] KDE Frameworks 5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094344] New: Review Request: kf5-kjs - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 functional module with JavaScript interpret
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094344 Bug ID: 1094344 Summary: Review Request: kf5-kjs - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 functional module with JavaScript interpret Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dvra...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-kjs.spec SRPM URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-kjs-4.99.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 functional module with JavaScript interpret. Fedora Account System Username: dvratil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094344] Review Request: kf5-kjs - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 functional module with JavaScript interpret
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094344 Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews), ||1086148 (kf5) Alias||kf5-kjs Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656997 [Bug 656997] kde-related package review tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086148 [Bug 1086148] KDE Frameworks 5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094345] Review Request: kf5-kplotting - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon for plotting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094345 Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews), ||1086148 (kf5) Alias||kf5-kplotting Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656997 [Bug 656997] kde-related package review tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086148 [Bug 1086148] KDE Frameworks 5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094345] New: Review Request: kf5-kplotting - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon for plotting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094345 Bug ID: 1094345 Summary: Review Request: kf5-kplotting - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon for plotting Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dvra...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-kplotting.spec SRPM URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-kplotting-4.99.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: KPlotting provides classes to do plotting. Fedora Account System Username: dvratil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094346] New: Review Request: kf5-kwidgetsaddons - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon with various classes on top of QtWidgets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094346 Bug ID: 1094346 Summary: Review Request: kf5-kwidgetsaddons - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon with various classes on top of QtWidgets Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dvra...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-kwidgetsaddons.spec SRPM URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-kwidgetsaddons-4.99.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon with various classes on top of QtWidgets. Fedora Account System Username: dvratil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094346] Review Request: kf5-kwidgetsaddons - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 addon with various classes on top of QtWidgets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094346 Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews), ||1086148 (kf5) Alias||kf5-kwidgetsaddons Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656997 [Bug 656997] kde-related package review tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086148 [Bug 1086148] KDE Frameworks 5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094348] New: Review Request: kf5-kwindowsystem - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 integration module with classes for windows management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094348 Bug ID: 1094348 Summary: Review Request: kf5-kwindowsystem - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 integration module with classes for windows management Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dvra...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-kwindowsystem.spec SRPM URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-kwindowsystem-4.99.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: KDE Frameworks Tier 1 integration module that provides classes for managing and working with windows. Fedora Account System Username: dvratil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094348] Review Request: kf5-kwindowsystem - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 integration module with classes for windows management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094348 Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews), ||1086148 (kf5) Alias||kf5-kwindowsystem Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656997 [Bug 656997] kde-related package review tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086148 [Bug 1086148] KDE Frameworks 5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094350] Review Request: kf5-solid - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 integration module that provides hardware information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094350 Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews), ||1086148 (kf5) Alias||kf5-solid Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656997 [Bug 656997] kde-related package review tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086148 [Bug 1086148] KDE Frameworks 5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094350] New: Review Request: kf5-solid - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 integration module that provides hardware information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094350 Bug ID: 1094350 Summary: Review Request: kf5-solid - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 integration module that provides hardware information Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dvra...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-solid.spec SRPM URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-solid-4.99.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: Solid provides the following features for application developers: - Hardware Discovery - Power Management - Network Management Fedora Account System Username: dvratil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094351] New: Review Request: kf5-sonnet - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 solution for spell checking
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094351 Bug ID: 1094351 Summary: Review Request: kf5-sonnet - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 solution for spell checking Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dvra...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-sonnet.spec SRPM URL: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/kf5/review/kf5-sonnet-4.99.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 solution for spell checking. Fedora Account System Username: dvratil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
