[Bug 1058019] Review Request: utf8proc - Library for processing UTF-8 encoded Unicode strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058019 --- Comment #18 from Milan Bouchet-Valat --- Orion, would you do the review? Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1100768] Review Request: rubygem-fog-core - Shared classes and tests for fog providers and services.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100768 Bug 1100768 depends on bug 1100461, which changed state. Bug 1100461 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-minitest-stub-const - Stub constants for the duration of a block in MiniTest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100461 What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1100461] Review Request: rubygem-minitest-stub-const - Stub constants for the duration of a block in MiniTest
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100461 Vít Ondruch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||rubygem-minitest-stub-const ||-0.1-1.fc21 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-05-28 04:08:29 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1095662] Review Request: perl-Sys-Detect-Virtualization - Detect if a UNIX system is running as a virtual machine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095662 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Sys-Detect-Virtualization-0.106-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Sys-Detect-Virtualization-0.106-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086217] Review Request: nodejs-strip-json-comments - Strip comments from JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086217 --- Comment #4 from anish --- Hi Tom Hughes! Thank you for package review and review comments, I have incorporated few the comments please find new spec and SRPM file on Spec URL: http://anishpatil.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-strip-json-comments.spec SRPM URL: http://anishpatil.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-strip-json-comments-0.1.2-3.fc20.src.rpm I have created upstream bug for inclusion of license,https://github.com/sindresorhus/strip-json-comments/issues/5 I have included test.js because test cases are broken that is why they have not included in release, i have created bug for that as well https://github.com/sindresorhus/strip-json-comments/issues/6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1101521] Review Request: geomorph - A height field editor for Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101521 --- Comment #5 from Didier --- (In reply to Lubomir Rintel from comment #3) > Adding FE_NEEDSPONSOR. > I'm willing to sponsor the packager if he wishes. Yes I wish (Look's like a wedding...) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1098097] Review Request: perl-Crypt-PBKDF2 - PBKDF2 password hashing algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098097 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1098097] Review Request: perl-Crypt-PBKDF2 - PBKDF2 password hashing algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098097 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Crypt-PBKDF2-0.140890-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Crypt-PBKDF2-0.140890-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086231] Review Request: nodejs-jsonparse - Pure-js JSON streaming parser for node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086231 --- Comment #4 from anish --- Thanks for review comments, please find new spec file and SRPM file SPEC file:- http://anishpatil.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-jsonparse.spec SRPM file :- http://anishpatil.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-jsonparse-0.0.6-3.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1098097] Review Request: perl-Crypt-PBKDF2 - PBKDF2 password hashing algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098097 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Crypt-PBKDF2-0.140890-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Crypt-PBKDF2-0.140890-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821917] Review Request: mu - maildir utility with Emacs support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821917 Ville Skyttä changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ville.sky...@iki.fi --- Comment #18 from Ville Skyttä --- (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #14) > And, will you continue packaging? If not I can take it. Any news to report here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1100899] Review Request: ratools - Framework for IPv6 Router Advertisements
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100899
--- Comment #6 from Björn "besser82" Esser ---
Created attachment 899924
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=899924&action=edit
fix Makefile for parallelized make-jobs
Package looks almost fine now. =)
Just a few little things:
* Please update to new upstream version 0.5.1 (as tagged in git) and
drop current `Patch0`, as this is fixed in the new release.
* Have a look a my attached patch and apply it to the sources. This
will fix parallelized make-jobs, so you can append `%{?_smp_mflags}`
again to the invocation of `make`. The patch has already been
upstreamed by me as you can see in my pull-request [1].
* You will need to add a blackslash '\' to the line which sets
{C,LD}FLAGS, like:
`CFLAGS="%{?optflags}" LDFLAGS="%{?__global_ldflags}" \`
In other cases the flags are not properly injected into make's
default $ENV.
* Setting `%config(noreplace)` for the bash-completion is a bad idea,
since this file is NOT config as meant to be customized by the user.
On newer versions of ratools there might be changes in CLI and the
bash-completion WILL change. The `noreplace` is meant for cases when
you ship some default config to be customized by the user with the
package, so the customized config will NOT be overwritten on pkg-updates.
In this case this config must be replaced on updates for said reasons.
So please drop the `noreplace` and just use `%config` for this file.
Before I'm going to sponsor you into the package-group, I want to see some
*INFORMAL* package-reviews made by you. You can find packages, which need a
review, over here [2]. Just pick 3 or 4 from that list and try to do a
fully-featured review, but without assigning the bug to you or raising the
fedora-review-flag in rhbz.
[1] https://github.com/danrl/ratools/pull/2
[2] http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1101521] Review Request: geomorph - A height field editor for Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101521
--- Comment #6 from Christopher Meng ---
1. g++ colmap.c -o colmap
Use %{_cxx} instead of g++.
2. %{__install} %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications
Please read:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1100899] Review Request: ratools - Framework for IPv6 Router Advertisements
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100899 --- Comment #7 from Christopher Meng --- Please use your real name instead of some alphbets like "flo" in bugzilla which is a serious place exactly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731191] Review Request: libspnav - Open source alternative to 3DConnextion drivers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731191 --- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731191] Review Request: libspnav - Open source alternative to 3DConnextion drivers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731191 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731519] Review Request: spacenavd - A free, compatible alternative for 3Dconnexion's input drivers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731519 --- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731519] Review Request: spacenavd - A free, compatible alternative for 3Dconnexion's input drivers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731519 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 835432] Review Request: python-pycxx - Write Python extensions in C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835432 --- Comment #43 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 835432] Review Request: python-pycxx - Write Python extensions in C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835432 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1083344] Review Request: hub - A command-line wrapper for git with github shortcuts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083344 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1083344] Review Request: hub - A command-line wrapper for git with github shortcuts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083344 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1100925] Review Request: librevenge - a base library for writing document import filters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100925 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1100925] Review Request: librevenge - a base library for writing document import filters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100925 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1090188] Review Request: rubygem-openscap - A FFI wrapper around the OpenSCAP library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090188 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- rubygem-openscap-0.1.0-5.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-openscap-0.1.0-5.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1101521] Review Request: geomorph - A height field editor for Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101521 --- Comment #7 from Didier --- Created attachment 899943 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=899943&action=edit Spec file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1087812] Review Request: gpaw - A grid-based real-space PAW method DFT code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087812 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System --- gpaw-0.10.0.11364-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gpaw-0.10.0.11364-3.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1087812] Review Request: gpaw - A grid-based real-space PAW method DFT code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087812 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System --- gpaw-0.10.0.11364-3.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gpaw-0.10.0.11364-3.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1087812] Review Request: gpaw - A grid-based real-space PAW method DFT code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087812 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1087812] Review Request: gpaw - A grid-based real-space PAW method DFT code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087812 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System --- gpaw-0.10.0.11364-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gpaw-0.10.0.11364-3.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1100899] Review Request: ratools - Framework for IPv6 Router Advertisements
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100899 --- Comment #8 from Björn "besser82" Esser --- (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #7) > Please use your real name instead of some alphbets like "flo" in bugzilla > which is a serious place exactly. And please make sure your email-address in rhbz is identical to the one used for your FAS-account. That is important for the privileges-management-system; otherwise privileges granted in FAS won't be applied correctly for rhbz. Cheers, Björn -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1089409] Review Request: Lmod - Environmental Modules System in Lua
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089409 --- Comment #5 from Mukundan Ragavan --- Sorry I could not get to this yesterday. A couple of quick questions before I run fedora-review - Provides: environment(modules) Should this be versioned instead? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1101521] Review Request: geomorph - A height field editor for Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101521
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
--- Comment #8 from Ralf Corsepius ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #6)
> 1. g++ colmap.c -o colmap
>
> Use %{_cxx} instead of g++.
1. This is a c-program => you are supposed to use a c compiler.
2. The correct rpm-macro corresponding to "g++" would be %{__cxx}, not %{_cxx}.
3. Compilation needs to take into account $RPM_OPT_FLAGS
=> The spec should use something similar to this:
%{__cc} ${RPM_OPT_FLAGS} -o colmap colmap.c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1063040] Review Request: rubygem-em-socksify - Transparent proxy support for any EventMachine protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063040
--- Comment #18 from Mo Morsi ---
(In reply to Ken Dreyer from comment #17)
> With the latest Ruby guidelines for Fedora 21, you will not need to
> explicitly declare Requires or Provides for your gem. Please use dist tags
> to wrap the Requires and Provides, like so:
>
> %if 0%{?fc19} || 0%{?fc20}
> Requires: ruby(release)
> Requires: rubygems
> Requires: rubygem(eventmachine) >= 1.0.0.beta.4
> %endif
>
Am a little confused as to whether ruby(release) should or should not be
included, brought up the issue on the ruby sig mailing list:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ruby-sig/2014-May/001588.html
> As a separate issue, please mark the %{gem_instdir}/README.md file as
> "%doc", since it is documentation, not code. (that one's confusing since
> it's already in a -doc subpackage...)
It was my understanding that files in the 'doc' subpackage didn't need to be
marked as %doc (since that is the whole intent of the subpackage). I could be
wrong on this, and know that it is ok to mark doc subpkg files as %doc, so am
fine either way.
>
> Please make these changes and I'll approve the package and sponsor you (with
> the caveat that mmorsi will be your main mentor and responsible for your
> actions in Fedora going forward).
>
Thanks Ken, yes I am fine w/ this. Nitesh I just ask that if you are unsure
about something, just ask me before committing / building. Most likely after a
while this will be unnecessary but at the beginning there are many
gotcha's/edge cases. Thanks again for the new package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1063038] Review Request: rubygem-cookiejar - The Ruby CookieJar is a library to help manage client-side cookies in pure Ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063038
--- Comment #9 from Mo Morsi ---
Went through this and compared it to the updated guidelines for rawhide
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=PackagingDrafts%2FRuby
From what I see the only change that is needed is removing the automatic
requires. If you are just submitting this to rawhide you can remove the
following completely:
Requires: ruby(release)
Requires: rubygems
As well as
Provides: rubygem(%{gem_name}) = %{version}
If you plan on including this package in F19 & F20, you will need to add the
conditional around these, similar to here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063040
Other than that the spec still looks good.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1063038] Review Request: rubygem-cookiejar - The Ruby CookieJar is a library to help manage client-side cookies in pure Ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063038 --- Comment #10 from Mo Morsi --- Note, while I linked the draft guidelines, they have been approved and are just pending the move over to the main ruby guidelines page on the Fedora wiki: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/409 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 459125] Review Request: freecad - A general purpose 3D CAD modeler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459125 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 458974] Review Request: OCE - OpenCASCADE Community Edition
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458974 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1097368] Review Request: smesh - OpenCascade based MESH framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097368 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 459125] Review Request: freecad - A general purpose 3D CAD modeler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459125 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System --- OCE-0.15-3.fc20.1,smesh-5.1.2.2-10.svn55.fc20,freecad-0.13-6.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/OCE-0.15-3.fc20.1,smesh-5.1.2.2-10.svn55.fc20,freecad-0.13-6.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 458974] Review Request: OCE - OpenCASCADE Community Edition
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458974 --- Comment #54 from Fedora Update System --- OCE-0.15-3.fc20.1,smesh-5.1.2.2-10.svn55.fc20,freecad-0.13-6.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/OCE-0.15-3.fc20.1,smesh-5.1.2.2-10.svn55.fc20,freecad-0.13-6.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1097368] Review Request: smesh - OpenCascade based MESH framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097368 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System --- OCE-0.15-3.fc20.1,smesh-5.1.2.2-10.svn55.fc20,freecad-0.13-6.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/OCE-0.15-3.fc20.1,smesh-5.1.2.2-10.svn55.fc20,freecad-0.13-6.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1089409] Review Request: Lmod - Environmental Modules System in Lua
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089409 --- Comment #6 from Orion Poplawski --- Nope - see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:EnvironmentModules -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 908088] Review Request: ascend - ASCEND modelling environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908088
--- Comment #12 from Rex Dieter ---
License: OK
Item 3 above not completely fixed, there's still one reference to
%{python_sitearch}
8. -libs subpkg MUST include ldconfig scriptlets (and now main pkg no longer
needs them)
9. nothing depends on new -libs subpkg. You probably want to add a dependency
to at least the main and -devel subpkgs:
Requires: %{name}-libs%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
(and have -devel drop dep on main pkg).
While we're at it, make -libs, -data dep on main pkg *not* use %_isa (else you
lose the whole point of making a -libs subpkg to be multilib -friendly)
10. nothing depends on -data subpkg, should main pkg depend on it? Or is it
optional addon?
11. While on the topic of -libs, I'd recommend it *only* include the shared
library here, plus any essential resources the library may require. Is there a
reason you added all that other stuff too?
12. MUST omit extraneous python dep
Requires: python >= 2.4
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Multiple_Python_Runtimes
(it'll get an automatic dependency on python(abi) instead)
13. MUST omit gcc-c++ dependency,
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2
14. URL: http://ascend.cheme.cmu.edu/
seems inaccessible (at the moment?). Googling found me http://ascend4.org/
too, but it's not working either. Please verify which URL is correct.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 908088] Review Request: ascend - ASCEND modelling environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908088 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(rdie...@math.unl. | |edu)| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1100925] Review Request: librevenge - a base library for writing document import filters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100925 David Tardon changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-05-28 09:25:26 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1102098] New: Review Request: lua-cyrussasl - Cyrus SASL library for Lua
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1102098 Bug ID: 1102098 Summary: Review Request: lua-cyrussasl - Cyrus SASL library for Lua Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org, robert.sch...@etes.de Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/lua-cyrussasl.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/lua-cyrussasl-1.0.0-1.src.rpm Description: Lua bindings for the Cyrus SASL APIs. This package is intended for all branches including Fedora EPEL 5. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1101521] Review Request: geomorph - A height field editor for Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101521 --- Comment #9 from Didier --- Spec URL: https://didier.dnsdynamic.net/repository/fc20/geomorph/geomorph.spec SRPM URL: https://didier.dnsdynamic.net/repository/fc20/geomorph/geomorph-0.60.1-2.fc20.src.rpm rpmlint report only 2 warnings about missing man page. Upstream don't provide them. Thanks for your help. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1071456] Review Request: oozie - A work-flow scheduling system for Apache Hadoop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071456 Darryl L. Pierce changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dpie...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dpie...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1081468] Review Request: perl-Term-ProgressBar-Simple - Simpler progress bars
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081468 Petr Šabata changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-05-28 09:39:32 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1081465] Review Request: perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet - Provide a progress meter if run interactively
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081465 Petr Šabata changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-05-28 09:40:43 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1081468] Review Request: perl-Term-ProgressBar-Simple - Simpler progress bars
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081468 Bug 1081468 depends on bug 1081465, which changed state. Bug 1081465 Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet - Provide a progress meter if run interactively https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081465 What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1081447] Review Request: perl-IO-Interactive - Utilities for interactive I/O
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081447 Petr Šabata changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-05-28 09:45:08 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1081465] Review Request: perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet - Provide a progress meter if run interactively
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081465 Bug 1081465 depends on bug 1081447, which changed state. Bug 1081447 Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Interactive - Utilities for interactive I/O https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081447 What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1100768] Review Request: rubygem-fog-core - Shared classes and tests for fog providers and services.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100768 Vít Ondruch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||rubygem-fog-core-1.22.0-1.f ||c21 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-05-28 09:48:04 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1100795] Review Request: rubygem-fog-brightbox - Module for `fog` or standalone provider to use the Brightbox Cloud
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100795 Bug 1100795 depends on bug 1100768, which changed state. Bug 1100768 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-fog-core - Shared classes and tests for fog providers and services. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100768 What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1100776] Review Request: rubygem-fog-json - JSON parsing for fog providers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100776 Bug 1100776 depends on bug 1100768, which changed state. Bug 1100768 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-fog-core - Shared classes and tests for fog providers and services. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100768 What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1051157] Review Request: mozjs24 - JavaScript interpreter and libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051157 Debarshi Ray changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Debarshi Ray --- mozjs24 is required for updating 0ad. See bug 1100875 Package Change Request == Package Name: mozjs24 New Branches: f20 f19 Owners: rishi InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1051157] Review Request: mozjs24 - JavaScript interpreter and libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051157 Debarshi Ray changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1101618 CC||paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr ||a...@gmail.com --- Comment #10 from Debarshi Ray --- *** Bug 1100875 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101618 [Bug 1101618] 0.0.16-2 Latest Alpha Not In Fedora 20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1101521] Review Request: geomorph - A height field editor for Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101521 Lubomir Rintel changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Lubomir Rintel --- Seems reasonably good to me now. I see that you've added the format-security patch; which is great. I'm a bit concerned about amount of stuff done in %prep. I understand it's not very easy to get rid of those, but you still might want to open a ticket upstream (to fix their encodings & FSF address, etc.). (By the way, your server seems to have SSL misconfigured: $ curl https://didier.dnsdynamic.net/repository/fc20/geomorph/geomorph.spec curl: (60) The certificate was signed using a signature algorithm that is disabled because it is not secure. More details here: http://curl.haxx.se/docs/sslcerts.html) Also, there's two tiny issues that you should address before importing the package: 1.) Adding --prefix to %configure is redundant; see 'rpm --eval %configure' 2.) You should take care not to modify timestamps of shared files when converting their encodings: 'mv -f $file.utf8 $file' should be preceded by by 'touch -r $file $file.utf8' I can't see that blocking the review though. Please proceed with http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1101521] Review Request: geomorph - A height field editor for Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101521 Lubomir Rintel changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lkund...@v3.sk -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1101521] Review Request: geomorph - A height field editor for Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101521 Lubomir Rintel changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 902086] Review request: Elasticsearch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902086 Lukas Zapletal changed: What|Removed |Added CC||l...@redhat.com --- Comment #18 from Lukas Zapletal --- Please go ahead, our team is interested as well. I will be writing SELinux policy in the incoming months for it. (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1102119) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1101308] Review Request: drupal7-panels - The Panels module allows a site administrator to create customized layouts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101308
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Jared Smith ---
Package is approved. rpmlint complains about zero-length files, but
those are indeed needed by this module.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 6 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[-]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL).
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
= EXTRA items =
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see a
[Bug 1100901] Review Request: rpm-ostree-toolbox - Extra tools for rpm-ostree
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100901 Patrick Uiterwijk changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Patrick Uiterwijk --- Okay, thanks for fixing those. Package has been APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1101764] Review Request: drupal7-devel - A suite of modules containing fun for module developers and themers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101764
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com,
||peter.bo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review?
||needinfo?(peter.borsa@gmail
||.com)
--- Comment #1 from Jared Smith ---
Package is *not* approved. Please check the "Issues" section below.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
Note: Cannot find LICENSE in rpm(s)
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
- JQuery and Krumo are currently bundled, and should be split out into their
own packages, using the Javascript Packaging guidelines at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:JavaScript
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[!]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 4 files.
[!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[-]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Ven
[Bug 1101521] Review Request: geomorph - A height field editor for Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101521 Volker Fröhlich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #11 from Volker Fröhlich --- What do you think? Does it make sense to mention geomorph on the GIS special interest page, or would you say it's more of an art and 3d design thing? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GIS -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1100901] Review Request: rpm-ostree-toolbox - Extra tools for rpm-ostree
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100901 --- Comment #6 from Colin Walters --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: rpm-ostree-toolbox Short Description: Extra tools for rpm-ostree Upstream URL: https://github.com/cgwalters/rpm-ostree-toolbox Owners: walters Branches: epel7 f20 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1100901] Review Request: rpm-ostree-toolbox - Extra tools for rpm-ostree
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100901 Colin Walters changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1101521] Review Request: geomorph - A height field editor for Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101521 --- Comment #12 from Ralf Corsepius --- (In reply to Lubomir Rintel from comment #10) > Seems reasonably good to me now. I see that you've added the format-security > patch; which is great. I am quite concerned about the source code's quality. To me it looks like a ca. 10 years pld student's work, which has never been adjusted to modern Linux demands nor seen actual keep-alive maintainance since then == Low quality and unsafe code. Openly said, I would not have approved this package because of the code quality. > I'm a bit concerned about amount of stuff done in %prep. I understand it's > not very easy to get rid of those, but you still might want to open a ticket > upstream (to fix their encodings & FSF address, etc.). You can simply ignore these FSF address warnings. Addressing these are upstream busyness, but otherwise are of not of any importance to Fedora. The fact rpmlint is complaining about these is an rpmlint sillyness. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 709328] Review Request: psi-plus - Jabber client based on Qt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709328 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(dr...@land.ru) --- Comment #89 from Rex Dieter --- ok, jdns is unbundled, please update psi-plus.spec to use it, and we can continue/finish the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1101030] Review Request: drupal7-xmlsitemap - The XML sitemap module creates a sitemap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101030 Peter Borsa changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Peter Borsa --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: drupal7-xmlsitemap Short Description: The XML sitemap module creates a sitemap Upstream URL: https://drupal.org/project/xmlsitemap Owners: asrob jsmith siwinski Branches: f20 el6 epel7 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1100973] Review Request: drupal7-honeypot - Honeypot uses both the honeypot and timestamp methods of deterring spam bots
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100973 Peter Borsa changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Peter Borsa --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: drupal7-honeypot Short Description: Honeypot uses both the honeypot and timestamp methods of deterring spam bots Upstream URL: https://drupal.org/project/honeypot Owners: asrob jsmith siwinski Branches: f20 el6 epel7 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1051157] Review Request: mozjs24 - JavaScript interpreter and libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051157 --- Comment #11 from adam.saund...@hushmail.com --- As Debarshi has mentioned, the latest release of the game 0ad depends on mozjs24. Any chance that this bug could be reopened for packaging mozjs24 for Fedora 20? With Fedora 21 still several months away, I fear that Fedora may stay behind on 0ad developments. The next 0ad alpha release, which could very well happen a few weeks after Fedora 21 goes stable, might then require a newer versions of mozjs. This could lead us back to the same unfortunate situation. Thank you very much for any efforts that could be made on this issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1101308] Review Request: drupal7-panels - The Panels module allows a site administrator to create customized layouts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101308 Peter Borsa changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Peter Borsa --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: drupal7-panels Short Description: The Panels module allows a site administrator to create customized layouts Upstream URL: http://drupal.org/project/panels Owners: asrob jsmith siwinski Branches: f20 el6 epel7 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1101521] Review Request: geomorph - A height field editor for Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101521 --- Comment #13 from Lubomir Rintel --- (In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #12) > (In reply to Lubomir Rintel from comment #10) > > Seems reasonably good to me now. I see that you've added the format-security > > patch; which is great. > > I am quite concerned about the source code's quality. To me it looks like a > ca. 10 years pld student's work, which has never been adjusted to modern > Linux demands nor seen actual keep-alive maintainance since then == Low > quality and unsafe code. Well, it's not exactly a secret that as far as it goes for academic/scientific software, code quality is often not vast and authors tend not to keep up with toolchain developments (I just updated siril today...). That said, this is solemnly packager's responsibility. If he's able to cope with the issues (and it seems to me he is) and the package serves its purpose (would it be submitted for the review if it didn't?) it's good to go. > Openly said, I would not have approved this package because of the code > quality. Thanks for sharing your attitude, but this would be just you making up guidelines. I'm positive that if someone challenged your decision given the relevance of your reasoning it would be overturned. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1051157] Review Request: mozjs24 - JavaScript interpreter and libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051157 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1051157] Review Request: mozjs24 - JavaScript interpreter and libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051157 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1100901] Review Request: rpm-ostree-toolbox - Extra tools for rpm-ostree
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100901 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1100901] Review Request: rpm-ostree-toolbox - Extra tools for rpm-ostree
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100901 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1101521] Review Request: geomorph - A height field editor for Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101521 --- Comment #14 from Didier --- (In reply to Volker Fröhlich from comment #11) > What do you think? Does it make sense to mention geomorph on the GIS special > interest page, or would you say it's more of an art and 3d design thing? > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GIS In my opinion, it's not a GIS tool, because the primary goal of this app is to create from scratch a pixmap which can be used to generate landscape with 3d tool like povray and co. Landscapes are realistic but not real. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1100973] Review Request: drupal7-honeypot - Honeypot uses both the honeypot and timestamp methods of deterring spam bots
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100973 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1100973] Review Request: drupal7-honeypot - Honeypot uses both the honeypot and timestamp methods of deterring spam bots
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100973 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1101030] Review Request: drupal7-xmlsitemap - The XML sitemap module creates a sitemap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101030 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1101030] Review Request: drupal7-xmlsitemap - The XML sitemap module creates a sitemap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101030 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1101308] Review Request: drupal7-panels - The Panels module allows a site administrator to create customized layouts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101308 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1101308] Review Request: drupal7-panels - The Panels module allows a site administrator to create customized layouts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101308 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1100873] Review Request: drupal7-views_slideshow - Views Slideshow can be used to create a slideshow of any content
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100873 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- drupal7-views_slideshow-3.1-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal7-views_slideshow-3.1-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1100873] Review Request: drupal7-views_slideshow - Views Slideshow can be used to create a slideshow of any content
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100873 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1100873] Review Request: drupal7-views_slideshow - Views Slideshow can be used to create a slideshow of any content
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100873 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- drupal7-views_slideshow-3.1-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal7-views_slideshow-3.1-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058019] Review Request: utf8proc - Library for processing UTF-8 encoded Unicode strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058019
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #19 from Orion Poplawski ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Generic:
[x: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 2 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/export/home/orion/redhat/utf8proc-1.1.6/1058019-utf8proc/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is prese
[Bug 1100199] Review Request: drupal7-google_analytics - Adds the Google Analytics web statistics tracking system to your website
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100199 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- drupal7-google_analytics-1.4-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal7-google_analytics-1.4-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1100899] Review Request: ratools - Framework for IPv6 Router Advertisements
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100899 Björn "besser82" Esser changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #899924|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #9 from Björn "besser82" Esser --- Created attachment 900078 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=900078&action=edit fix Makefile for parallelized make-jobs I reworked my patch a bit to fix one corner-case fail… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1100199] Review Request: drupal7-google_analytics - Adds the Google Analytics web statistics tracking system to your website
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100199 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- drupal7-google_analytics-1.4-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal7-google_analytics-1.4-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1098625] Review Request: php-pear-text-wiki - Transforms Wiki and BBCode markup into XHTML, LaTeX or plain text
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098625 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) --- Great. PACKAGE APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1101521] Review Request: geomorph - A height field editor for Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101521 Didier changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Didier --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: geomorph Short Description: A height field editor for Linux Upstream URL: http://geomorph.sourceforge.net Owners: tartare Branches: f19 f20 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1102297] New: Review Request: drupal7-module_filter - Module filter gives the ability to quickly find the module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1102297 Bug ID: 1102297 Summary: Review Request: drupal7-module_filter - Module filter gives the ability to quickly find the module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: peter.bo...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal7-module_filter.spec SRPM URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal7-module_filter-2.0-0.1.alpha2.fc21.src.rpm Description: The modules list page can become quite big when dealing with a fairly large site or even just a dev site meant for testing new and various modules being considered. What this module aims to accomplish is the ability to quickly find the module you are looking for without having to rely on the browsers search feature which more times than not shows you the module name in the 'Required by' or 'Depends on' sections of the various modules or even some other location on the page like a menu item. Fedora Account System Username: asrob -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1098097] Review Request: perl-Crypt-PBKDF2 - PBKDF2 password hashing algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098097 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Crypt-PBKDF2-0.140890-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1087812] Review Request: gpaw - A grid-based real-space PAW method DFT code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087812 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System --- gpaw-0.10.0.11364-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1083344] Review Request: hub - A command-line wrapper for git with github shortcuts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083344 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
