[Bug 1119243] Review Request: perl-Test-LoadAllModules - Do use_ok for modules in search path
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119243 David Dick changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from David Dick --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Test-LoadAllModules Short Description: Do use_ok for modules in search path Upstream URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-LoadAllModules/ Owners: ddick Branches: el6, epel7, f20, f21 InitialCC: perl-sig Thanks Christopher! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 988648] Review Request: libunity - Unity instrumenting and integration library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988648 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1121005 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121005 [Bug 1121005] dee-1.2.7 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1119243] Review Request: perl-Test-LoadAllModules - Do use_ok for modules in search path
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119243 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Christopher Meng --- Friendly note: perl Makefile.PL NO_PACKLIST=1 -8<-- Since 6.75_01 (F21), it's possible to disable creating packlist files by passing NO_PACKLIST=1 argument to Makefile.PL. --->8 PACKAGE APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1119013] Review Request: perl-Time-timegm - UTC version of mktime()
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119013 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Time-timegm Short Description: UTC version of mktime() Upstream URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Time-timegm/ Owners: cicku Branches: el6 epel7 f21 f20 f19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1028712] Review Request: Pianobar - Console Pandora Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028712 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2014-07-18 02:09:39 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120788] Review Request: Rex - Tool for Automation, Remote Execution and Configuration Deployment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120788 --- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng --- Last year I thought this package was already in the repo, now I checked again seems that I was wrong and skipped it... I will review it later. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995933] Re-Review Request: mlmmj - A simple and slim mailing list manager inspired by ezmlm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995933 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Christopher Meng --- Package Change Request == Package Name: mlmmj New Branches: epel7 Owners: cicku -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 967153] Review Request: phrel - Per Host RatE Limiter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967153 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Christopher Meng --- Package Change Request == Package Name: phrel New Branches: epel7 Owners: cicku -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1102098] Review Request: lua-cyrussasl - Cyrus SASL library for Lua
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1102098 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||i...@cicku.me Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|i...@cicku.me Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1117961] Review Request: lua-msgpack - Lua binary-based efficient object serialization library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117961 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||i...@cicku.me Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|i...@cicku.me Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120983] Review Request: sambada - Landscape genomic analysis software of large datasets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120983 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||NotReady -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120982] Review Request: scythestat - Scythe Statistical Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120982 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1120983 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120983 [Bug 1120983] Review Request: sambada - Landscape genomic analysis software of large datasets -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120983] Review Request: sambada - Landscape genomic analysis software of large datasets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120983 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1120982 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120982 [Bug 1120982] Review Request: scythestat - Scythe Statistical Library -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120983] New: Review Request: sambada - Landscape genomic analysis software of large datasets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120983 Bug ID: 1120983 Summary: Review Request: sambada - Landscape genomic analysis software of large datasets Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: i...@cicku.me QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://us-la.cicku.me/sambada.spec SRPM URL: http://us-la.cicku.me/sambada-0.4.2-1.fc22.src.rpm Description: Samβada is an integrated software for landscape genomic analysis of large datasets. The key features are the study of local adaptation in relation- ship with environment and the measure of spatial autocorrelation in en- vironmental and molecular datasets. On one hand, Samβada uses logistic regressions to estimate the probability that an individual carries a specific genetic marker given the habitat that characterises its sampling site. One the other hand, spatial autocorrelation is measured with Moran’s I and lo- cal indicators of spatial association, in order to assess whether the observed data in each location depends on the values in the neighbouring locations. Underlying models are kept simple to put emphasis on process efficiency and user-available options. Fedora Account System Username: cicku -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120982] New: Review Request: scythestat - Scythe Statistical Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120982 Bug ID: 1120982 Summary: Review Request: scythestat - Scythe Statistical Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: i...@cicku.me QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://us-la.cicku.me/scythestat.spec SRPM URL: http://us-la.cicku.me/scythestat-1.0.3-1.fc22.src.rpm Description: The Scythe Statistical Library is an open source C++ library for statistical computation, written by Daniel Pemstein (University of Mississippi and University of Illinois), Kevin M. Quinn (UC Berkeley), and Andrew D. Martin (University of Michigan). It includes a suite of matrix manipulation functions, a suite of pseudo-random number generators, and a suite of numerical optimization routines. Programs written using Scythe are generally much faster than those written in commonly used interpreted languages, such as R and MATLAB, and can be compiled on any system with the GNU GCC compiler (and perhaps with other C++ compilers). One of the primary design goals of the Scythe developers has been ease of use for non-expert C++ programmers. We provide ease of use through three primary mechanisms: (1)Operator and function over-loading. (2)Numerous pre-fabricated utility functions. (3)Clear documentation and example programs. Fedora Account System Username: cicku -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1119095] Review Request: python-djvulibre - Python bindings to DjVuLibre
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119095 --- Comment #10 from Michel Alexandre Salim --- Hi Brian, I had to sponsor you first, otherwise your SCM request can't be processed properly. I've done that now, so do go ahead. I'm michel_slm on IRC and you have my email .. good luck! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1119081] Review Request: ocaml-camlp4 - Pre-Processor-Pretty-Printer for OCaml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119081 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(rjo...@redhat.com | |) | |needinfo?(michel@michel-slm | |.name) | --- Comment #11 from Michel Alexandre Salim --- Hi Richard, Yep, changes are fine. Was stuck in traffic for much of last night, sorry for the delay. Package is APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1012392] Review Request: nanomsg - nanomsg is a socket library that provides several common communication patterns
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012392 --- Comment #15 from Christopher Meng --- Last comment here: Zoltan, if you can't repond in 1 week I will close it. Japheth, I packaged this long time ago, and postponed by this needsponsor review. If you are a packager already, feel free to submit and I will review, if not I will do this. Fedora always lacks some packages just because of such reviews, I'm annoyed now. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1012392] Review Request: nanomsg - nanomsg is a socket library that provides several common communication patterns
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012392 --- Comment #14 from Japheth Cleaver --- *ping* I'd really love to see this included in Fedora. I'd be willing to take it (and this BZ) on if there's no other activity occurring. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120791] Review Request: freesteam - Calculate the properties of water and steam
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120791 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||i...@cicku.me Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|i...@cicku.me Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120447] Review Request: tiptop - Performance monitoring tool based on hardware counters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120447 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- tiptop-2.2-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tiptop-2.2-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120447] Review Request: tiptop - Performance monitoring tool based on hardware counters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120447 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- tiptop-2.2-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tiptop-2.2-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120447] Review Request: tiptop - Performance monitoring tool based on hardware counters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120447 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-07-17 22:10:34 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120771] Review Request: uronode - Alternative packet radio system for Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120771 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||i...@cicku.me Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|i...@cicku.me Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120788] Review Request: Rex - Tool for Automation, Remote Execution and Configuration Deployment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120788 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||i...@cicku.me Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|i...@cicku.me Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1097426] Review Request: dpdk - dataplane development toolkit for optimized network appliances
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097426 John W. Linville changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #918804|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #43 from John W. Linville --- Created attachment 918861 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=918861&action=edit proposed-guidline-fixups.patch Post the correct/current version of the patch... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1008532] Review Request: copr - Cool Other Package Repo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008532 Bug 1008532 depends on bug 1010811, which changed state. Bug 1010811 Summary: Support for python3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010811 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120882] Review Request: golang-googlecode-gogoprotobuf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120882 Colin Walters changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1047194 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047194 [Bug 1047194] etcd-0.4.5 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120882] New: Review Request: golang-googlecode-gogoprotobuf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120882 Bug ID: 1120882 Summary: Review Request: golang-googlecode-gogoprotobuf Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: walt...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://github.com/projectatomic/golang-googlecode-gogoprotobuf-package Fedora Account System Username: walters Note: this is a fork of golang-googlecode-goprotobuf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120857] Review Request: golang-github-mreiferson-go-httpclient
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120857 Vincent Batts changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vba...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|vba...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120865] Review Request: golang-github-BurntSushi-toml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120865 Vincent Batts changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vba...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|vba...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120867] Review Request: golang-github-rcrowley-go-metrics-package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120867 Vincent Batts changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vba...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|vba...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120873] New: Review Request: golang-github-coreos-go-etcd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120873 Bug ID: 1120873 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-coreos-go-etcd Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: walt...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://github.com/projectatomic/golang-github-coreos-go-etcd-package Fedora Account System Username: walters -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120873] Review Request: golang-github-coreos-go-etcd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120873 Colin Walters changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1047194 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047194 [Bug 1047194] etcd-0.4.5 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120867] Review Request: golang-github-rcrowley-go-metrics-package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120867 Colin Walters changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1047194 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047194 [Bug 1047194] etcd-0.4.5 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120867] New: Review Request: golang-github-rcrowley-go-metrics-package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120867 Bug ID: 1120867 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-rcrowley-go-metrics-package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: walt...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://github.com/projectatomic/golang-github-rcrowley-go-metrics-package Fedora Account System Username: walters -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120865] Review Request: golang-github-BurntSushi-toml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120865 Colin Walters changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1047194 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047194 [Bug 1047194] etcd-0.4.5 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120865] New: Review Request: golang-github-BurntSushi-toml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120865 Bug ID: 1120865 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-BurntSushi-toml Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: walt...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://github.com/projectatomic/golang-github-BurntSushi-toml-package Fedora Account System Username: walters -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120857] Review Request: golang-github-mreiferson-go-httpclient
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120857 Colin Walters changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1047194 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047194 [Bug 1047194] etcd-0.4.5 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120857] Review Request: golang-github-mreiferson-go-httpclient
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120857 --- Comment #1 from Colin Walters --- Er, Spec URL: https://github.com/projectatomic/golang-github-mreiferson-go-httpclient-package/blob/master/golang-github-mreiferson-go-httpclient.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120857] New: Review Request: golang-github-mreiferson-go-httpclient
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120857 Bug ID: 1120857 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-mreiferson-go-httpclient Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: walt...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: golang-github-mreiferson-go-httpclient.spec SRPM URL: I'm trying to avoid duplication, use git clone Description: It's in the spec Fedora Account System Username: walters -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1116487] Review Request: perl-App-DuckDuckGo - Application to query DuckDuckGo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116487 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1116487] Review Request: perl-App-DuckDuckGo - Application to query DuckDuckGo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116487 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- perl-App-DuckDuckGo-0.008-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-App-DuckDuckGo-0.008-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1104746] Review Request: soscleaner - sosreport data obfuscation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System --- soscleaner-0.2-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/soscleaner-0.2-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1104746] Review Request: soscleaner - sosreport data obfuscation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1104746] Review Request: soscleaner - sosreport data obfuscation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System --- soscleaner-0.2-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/soscleaner-0.2-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1081434] Review Request: ip2location - IP2location library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081434 --- Comment #31 from Guruswamy Basavaiah --- Any more comments or can this package be approved if no more comments. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 819951] Review Request: ostree - Linux-based operating system develop/build/deploy tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819951 Colin Walters changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-07-17 15:52:56 --- Comment #25 from Colin Walters --- This was built long ago, -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1114413] Review Request: python-flask-cors - Flask extension to support cross origin resource sharing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114413 Lokesh Mandvekar changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|low |medium Flags||fedora-review? Severity|low |medium --- Comment #2 from Lokesh Mandvekar --- Marek, looks like the docker-registry 0.7.3 doesn't work without flask-cors, so we probably need this to go in as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1097426] Review Request: dpdk - dataplane development toolkit for optimized network appliances
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097426 John W. Linville changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #913459|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #42 from John W. Linville --- Created attachment 918804 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=918804&action=edit proposed-guidline-fixups.patch Patch with proposed package overhaul to satisfy guidelines... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1097426] Review Request: dpdk - dataplane development toolkit for optimized network appliances
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097426
--- Comment #41 from John W. Linville ---
re: comment 34
Upstream DPDK is a performance-oriented project. By default, it uses a variety
of compiler optimizations specific to the machine where it is built in order to
squeeze as much performance from that machine as possible.
In many ways, packaging for Fedora is an alien environment for DPDK. Fedora
requires a generic package that runs generically on all machines of the same
architecture (more or less). That is the source of the tension here.
Most likely, no one will use a generic Fedora DPDK package for deploying an
app. But they might use it for development. Since that is our target, we can
live with more generic compiler options. Given that, I think we can use the
EXTRA_CFLAGS option to include the %{optflags}. Also, we can specify
CONFIG_RTE_MACHINE=default to build for a least-common-denominator machine.
Unfortunately, I can not get i686 to build when specifying the machine type
(default or otherwise) and using the Fedora build options. I am removing
%{ix86} from the ExclusiveArch line in dpdk.spec.
I'll attach a patch with my proposed changes to the package. I have done a
scratch build here:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7159930
Please let me know ASAP if anyone has any severe problem with these
changes...thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079090] Review Request: layla-fonts - A collection of traditional Arabic fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079090 --- Comment #7 from Mohammed Isam --- Added a koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7159906 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1100477] Review Request: python-natsort - Python library that sorts lists using the "natural order" sort
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100477 --- Comment #7 from Pete Travis --- No packaging complaints. Upstream has released 3.3.0, but it doesn't look like anything that will need to be addressed in the spec - besides the addition of a couple unit tests, and I'm not going to block the review for their inclusion. APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1100477] Review Request: python-natsort - Python library that sorts lists using the "natural order" sort
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100477
Pete Travis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|i...@cicku.me |m...@petetravis.com
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #6 from Pete Travis ---
Okay, not *soon* but:
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
[+] = Manual review pass
[0] = Manual review fail
= MUST items =
Generic:
[+]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[+]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"Unknown or generated". 12 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/pete/1100477-python-natsort/licensecheck.txt
[+]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[+]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[+]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[+]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[+]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[+]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[+]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[+]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[+]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[+]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[+]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 61440 bytes in 4 files.
[+]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[+]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[+]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[+]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[+]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
python3-natsort
[+]: Package functions as described.
[+]: Latest version is packaged.
[+]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[+]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-
[Bug 1079090] Review Request: layla-fonts - A collection of traditional Arabic fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079090 --- Comment #6 from Mohammed Isam --- Spec URL: http://sites.google.com/site/mohammedisam2000/home/projects/layla-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://sites.google.com/site/mohammedisam2000/home/projects/layla-fonts-1.1-1.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1084190] Review Request: hamekoz-tiempos - Simple app to calculate diff between two dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084190 --- Comment #12 from Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz --- Any feedback?? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079090] Review Request: layla-fonts - A collection of traditional Arabic fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079090 --- Comment #5 from Mohammed Isam --- Any review for this request please? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1110913] Review Request: pam_script - PAM module for executing scripts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110913 Jason Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Jason Taylor --- Package Change Request == Package Name: pam_script New Branches: epel7 Owners: jtaylor InitialCC: jtaylor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079090] Review Request: layla-fonts - A collection of traditional Arabic fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079090 --- Comment #4 from Mohammed Isam --- Spec URL: http://sites.google.com/site/mohammedisam2000/home/projects/layla-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://sites.google.com/site/mohammedisam2000/home/projects/layla-fonts-1.1-1.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120366] Review Request: nodejs-set-immediate - A shim for the setImmediate API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120366 Tom Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-07-17 13:31:17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 505154] Tracker: Review Requests for Science and Technology related packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1120791 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120791 [Bug 1120791] Review Request: freesteam - Calculate the properties of water and steam -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120791] Review Request: freesteam - Calculate the properties of water and steam
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120791 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||505154 (FE-SCITECH) --- Comment #1 from Antonio Trande --- koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7128364 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 [Bug 505154] Tracker: Review Requests for Science and Technology related packages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120791] New: Review Request: freesteam - Calculate the properties of water and steam
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120791 Bug ID: 1120791 Summary: Review Request: freesteam - Calculate the properties of water and steam Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: anto.tra...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/freesteam/freesteam.spec SRPM URL: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/freesteam/freesteam-2.1-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: Open source steam property routines in C. Implements the IAPWS-IF97 steam tables from the International Association for the Properties of Water and Steam. Includes two-way property solvers and test suite. Can be used from C/C++, Fortran, Python, LabVIEW, Octave and ASCEND. Fedora Account System Username: sagitter -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1115894] Review Request: ghc-hgettext - Bindings to libintl.h (gettext, bindtextdomain)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115894 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-hgettext-0.1.30-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-hgettext-0.1.30-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1115894] Review Request: ghc-hgettext - Bindings to libintl.h (gettext, bindtextdomain)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115894 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1115894] Review Request: ghc-hgettext - Bindings to libintl.h (gettext, bindtextdomain)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115894 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-hgettext-0.1.30-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-hgettext-0.1.30-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120788] Review Request: Rex - Tool for Automation, Remote Execution and Configuration Deployment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120788 --- Comment #1 from Dominic Hopf --- This package built on koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7159400 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120788] New: Review Request: Rex - Tool for Automation, Remote Execution and Configuration Deployment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120788 Bug ID: 1120788 Summary: Review Request: Rex - Tool for Automation, Remote Execution and Configuration Deployment Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dma...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://dmaphy.fedorapeople.org//Rex.spec SRPM URL: http://dmaphy.fedorapeople.org//Rex-0.49.1-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: (R)?ex(ify) is an automation tool on basis of the Perl scripting language. You can use it in your everyday DevOps life for: * Continous Delivery * Configuration Management * Automation * Cloud Deployment * Virtualization * Software Rollout * Server Provisioning -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1115662] Review Request: nodejs-caniuse-db - Raw browser/feature support data from caniuse.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115662
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||panem...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
Suggestions:
1) Add following to spec
BuildArch: noarch
%if 0%{?fedora} >= 19
ExclusiveArch: %{nodejs_arches} noarch
%else
ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 %{arm} noarch
%endif
2) Update to latest upstream
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1115663] Review Request: nodejs-clean-css - A well-tested CSS minifier
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115663
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||panem...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
Suggestions:
1) Add following to spec
BuildArch: noarch
%if 0%{?fedora} >= 19
ExclusiveArch: %{nodejs_arches} noarch
%else
ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 %{arm} noarch
%endif
2) Update to latest upstream
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1119081] Review Request: ocaml-camlp4 - Pre-Processor-Pretty-Printer for OCaml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119081 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(michel@michel-slm ||.name) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1119081] Review Request: ocaml-camlp4 - Pre-Processor-Pretty-Printer for OCaml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119081 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(rjo...@redhat.com ||) --- Comment #10 from Richard W.M. Jones --- Hi Michel, did you have a chance to look at the updated spec file? It ought to fix everything that is possible to fix. Unfortunately this bug blocks many OCaml package rebuilds in Rawhide. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1115701] Review Request: nodejs-portscanner - Asynchronous port scanner for Node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115701
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||panem...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
Review:
+ mock build is successful for f22
- rpmlint output on rpms gave
nodejs-portscanner.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) js -> dis, ks, j
nodejs-portscanner.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US js -> dis, ks,
j
nodejs-portscanner.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) js -> dis, ks, j
nodejs-portscanner.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US js -> dis,
ks, j
nodejs-portscanner.x86_64: E: no-binary
nodejs-portscanner.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
nodejs-portscanner.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/lib/node_modules/portscanner/node_modules/async
/usr/lib/node_modules/async
nodejs-portscanner-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 6 warnings.
==> See suggestion below
+ Source verified with upstream as (sha256sum)
srpm tarball
:20195e1ab19d851ebe3d595218b376a1e4486035d627d0262fe0d4ba3fa8e1f5
upstream tarball
:20195e1ab19d851ebe3d595218b376a1e4486035d627d0262fe0d4ba3fa8e1f5
+ License "MIT" is valid and is included in its own file as %doc.
+ rest looks following packaging guidelines
Suggestions:
1) Add following to spec
BuildArch: noarch
%if 0%{?fedora} >= 19
ExclusiveArch: %{nodejs_arches} noarch
%else
ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 %{arm} noarch
%endif
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1115661] Review Request: nodejs-base64-js - Base64 encoding/decoding in pure JS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115661
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||panem...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
Review:
+ mock build is successful for f22
- rpmlint output on rpms gave
nodejs-base64-js.src: W: invalid-url URL:
https://www.npmjs.org/package/base64-js
nodejs-base64-js.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
http://registry.npmjs.org/base64-js/-/base64-js-0.0.7.tgz
nodejs-base64-js.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL:
https://www.npmjs.org/package/base64-js
nodejs-base64-js.x86_64: E: no-binary
nodejs-base64-js.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
nodejs-base64-js-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL:
https://www.npmjs.org/package/base64-js
nodejs-base64-js-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 5 warnings.
==> See suggestion below
+ Source verified with upstream as (sha256sum)
srpm tarball
:dc7c93b9932956dffa33960b55d2d5b3692864f0d1121a940cfe5d11a4bdf76c
upstream tarball
:dc7c93b9932956dffa33960b55d2d5b3692864f0d1121a940cfe5d11a4bdf76c
+ License "MIT" is valid
- License is NOT packaged as %doc.
+ rest looks following packaging guidelines
Suggestions:
1) Good to add some description instead just package name
2) Add LICENSE.MIT to %doc
3) Add following to spec
BuildArch: noarch
%if 0%{?fedora} >= 19
ExclusiveArch: %{nodejs_arches} noarch
%else
ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 %{arm} noarch
%endif
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1115709] Review Request: nodejs-w3cjs - A node.js module for using the w3c validator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115709
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||panem...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
Review:
+ mock build is successful for f22
- rpmlint output on rpms gave
nodejs-w3cjs.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) js -> dis, ks, j
nodejs-w3cjs.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) validator -> lavatorial
nodejs-w3cjs.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US js -> dis, ks, j
nodejs-w3cjs.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US url's -> curl's,
purl's, hurl's
nodejs-w3cjs.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US html -> HTML, ht ml,
ht-ml
nodejs-w3cjs.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US validator ->
lavatorial
nodejs-w3cjs.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) js -> dis, ks, j
nodejs-w3cjs.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) validator -> lavatorial
nodejs-w3cjs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US js -> dis, ks, j
nodejs-w3cjs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US url's -> curl's,
purl's, hurl's
nodejs-w3cjs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US html -> HTML, ht
ml, ht-ml
nodejs-w3cjs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US validator ->
lavatorial
nodejs-w3cjs.x86_64: E: no-binary
nodejs-w3cjs.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
nodejs-w3cjs.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/lib/node_modules/w3cjs/node_modules/argparse
/usr/lib/node_modules/argparse
nodejs-w3cjs.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/lib/node_modules/w3cjs/node_modules/superagent
/usr/lib/node_modules/superagent
nodejs-w3cjs-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 15 warnings.
==> See suggestion below
+ Source verified with upstream as (sha256sum)
srpm tarball
:172553bbbc2f1ce5c24d46a926f311de9d8058eddc7f716b8da046fc4a6193e2
upstream tarball
:172553bbbc2f1ce5c24d46a926f311de9d8058eddc7f716b8da046fc4a6193e2
+ License "Public Domain" is valid and is included in its own file as %doc.
+ rest looks following packaging guidelines
Suggestions:
1) Update to latest upstream 0.1.25
2) Add following to spec
BuildArch: noarch
%if 0%{?fedora} >= 19
ExclusiveArch: %{nodejs_arches} noarch
%else
ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 %{arm} noarch
%endif
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1115672] Review Request: nodejs-grunt-contrib-csslint - Lint CSS files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115672
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||panem...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
Review:
+ mock build is successful for f22
- rpmlint output on rpms gave
nodejs-grunt-contrib-csslint.x86_64: E: no-binary
nodejs-grunt-contrib-csslint.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
nodejs-grunt-contrib-csslint.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/lib/node_modules/grunt-contrib-csslint/node_modules/csslint
/usr/lib/node_modules/csslint
nodejs-grunt-contrib-csslint-debuginfo.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C
This package provides debug information for package
nodejs-grunt-contrib-csslint.
nodejs-grunt-contrib-csslint-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 2 warnings.
==> See suggestion below
+ Source verified with upstream as (sha256sum)
srpm tarball
:534cd31567ecc3ef2b3cf987df0a1e9969933f767cbd8adb33f43937c790d9ca
upstream tarball
:534cd31567ecc3ef2b3cf987df0a1e9969933f767cbd8adb33f43937c790d9ca
+ License "MIT" is valid and is included in its own file as %doc.
+ rest looks following packaging guidelines
Suggestions:
1) Add following to spec
BuildArch: noarch
%if 0%{?fedora} >= 19
ExclusiveArch: %{nodejs_arches} noarch
%else
ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 %{arm} noarch
%endif
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 956525] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-opentegra - open source Nvidia Tegra driver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956525 --- Comment #21 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) --- @Dennis, We can certainly provide informations on what's happened in this review, specifically the problematic role switch that occurred during the review was mentioned here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956525#c13 Jiri and I are basically both fedora contributors who want to go ahead with this package. The current shape of the opentegra DDX package satisfies both party. That being said if there is anything left to your eyes we can still take your advices into account. I consider your escalation to fesco for this issue a bit rush, specially since I am a very rational person. That been said I agree to fix the review to satisfy the fedora due process. Please let me know what you believe would be the appropriate way to fix this situation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120293] Review Request: perl-Inline-C - Write Perl subroutines in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120293 --- Comment #10 from Petr Šabata --- Thank you, both. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120680] Review Request: trace-summary - A script generating break-downs of network traffic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120680 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120680] Review Request: trace-summary - A script generating break-downs of network traffic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120680 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120447] Review Request: tiptop - Performance monitoring tool based on hardware counters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120447 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120366] Review Request: nodejs-set-immediate - A shim for the setImmediate API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120366 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120366] Review Request: nodejs-set-immediate - A shim for the setImmediate API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120366 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120447] Review Request: tiptop - Performance monitoring tool based on hardware counters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120447 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120293] Review Request: perl-Inline-C - Write Perl subroutines in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120293 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120293] Review Request: perl-Inline-C - Write Perl subroutines in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120293 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1104746] Review Request: soscleaner - sosreport data obfuscation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1104746] Review Request: soscleaner - sosreport data obfuscation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746 --- Comment #23 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120771] New: Review Request: uronode - Alternative packet radio system for Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120771 Bug ID: 1120771 Summary: Review Request: uronode - Alternative packet radio system for Linux Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jskar...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~jskarvad/uronode/uronode.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~jskarvad/uronode/uronode-2.1-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: URONode is an alternative packet radio system for Linux. It supports cross-port digipeating, automatic importing of flexnet routing, various IP functions, and ANSI colours. Fedora Account System Username: jskarvad FYI all patches were sent upstream. The issue with md2.c is currently reviewed by Fedora Legal (ticket: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2014-July/002484.html) and upstream is currently aware of it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1018544] Review Request: libcuefile - A stripped down version of cuetools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018544 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Last Closed||2014-07-17 11:21:30 --- Comment #3 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Not required any more. musepack builds against libcue now. Closing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1018546] Review Request: musepack-libmpc - Living audio compression
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018546 Bug 1018546 depends on bug 1018544, which changed state. Bug 1018544 Summary: Review Request: libcuefile - A stripped down version of cuetools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018544 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1018546] Review Request: musepack-libmpc - Living audio compression
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018546
--- Comment #4 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
I finally got down to this.
Here's the new spec:
http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/musepack-libmpc/musepack-libmpc.spec
New srpm:
http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/musepack-libmpc/musepack-libmpc-1.3.0-0.1.svn484.fc22.src.rpm
All dependent packages will need to be rebuilt since this version changes the
version of the provided shared object: libmpcdec.so.6()(64bit). The older was
libmpcdec.so.5()(64bit)
rpmlint errors:
[asinha@ankur-laptop SRPMS]$ rpmlint
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/*.rpm
./musepack-libmpc-1.3.0-0.1.svn484.fc20.src.rpm ../SPECS/musepack-libmpc.spec
libmpcdec.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Musepack -> Muse pack,
Muse-pack, Mudpack
libmpcdec.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Musepack -> Muse
pack, Muse-pack, Mudpack
libmpcdec.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mpcdec
libmpcdec-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Musepack -> Muse pack,
Muse-pack, Mudpack
libmpcdec-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
libmpcdec-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
musepack-libmpc.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lossless -> loss
less, loss-less, loveless
musepack-libmpc.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US patentless ->
patent less, patent-less, pathless
musepack-libmpc.src:4: W: macro-in-comment %{actual_name}
musepack-libmpc.src: W: invalid-url Source0: libmpc_r484.tar.gz
musepack-libmpc.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lossless ->
loss less, loss-less, loveless
musepack-libmpc.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US patentless ->
patent less, patent-less, pathless
musepack-libmpc.x86_64: W: no-documentation
musepack-libmpc.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary wavcmp
musepack-libmpc.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mpccut
musepack-libmpc.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mpc2sv8
musepack-libmpc.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mpcgain
musepack-libmpc.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mpcenc
musepack-libmpc-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
musepack-libmpc.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lossless -> loss
less, loss-less, loveless
musepack-libmpc.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US patentless ->
patent less, patent-less, pathless
musepack-libmpc.src:4: W: macro-in-comment %{actual_name}
musepack-libmpc.src: W: invalid-url Source0: libmpc_r484.tar.gz
../SPECS/musepack-libmpc.spec:4: W: macro-in-comment %{actual_name}
../SPECS/musepack-libmpc.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: libmpc_r484.tar.gz
7 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 25 warnings.
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1117562] Review Request: golang-github-tchap-go-patricia - A generic patricia trie implemented in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117562 Lokesh Mandvekar changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1118603 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118603 [Bug 1118603] docker-io-1.1.1 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1111916] Review Request: golang-github-docker-libcontainer - Configuration options for containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916 Lokesh Mandvekar changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1118603 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118603 [Bug 1118603] docker-io-1.1.1 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1114175] Review Request: golang-github-codegangsta-cli - Package for building command line apps in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114175 Lokesh Mandvekar changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1118603 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118603 [Bug 1118603] docker-io-1.1.1 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120293] Review Request: perl-Inline-C - Write Perl subroutines in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120293 Petr Šabata changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Petr Šabata --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Inline-C Short Description: Write Perl subroutines in C Upstream URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Inline-C/ Owners: psabata jplesnik ppisar Branches: f21 InitialCC: perl-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120293] Review Request: perl-Inline-C - Write Perl subroutines in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120293
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from Petr Pisar ---
Spec file changes:
$ diff -u perl-Inline-C.spec{.old,}
--- perl-Inline-C.spec.old 2014-07-17 15:13:52.0 +0200
+++ perl-Inline-C.spec 2014-07-17 16:24:15.0 +0200
@@ -6,10 +6,10 @@
Group: Development/Libraries
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Inline-C/
# Created from
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/I/IN/INGY/Inline-C-%{version}.tar.gz
-# tar xzf Inline-C-%{version}.tar.gz && \
-# rm -f Inline-C-%{version}/lib/Inline/C/Cookbook.pod && \
-# sed -e '/Cookbook.pod$/d' -i Inline-C-%{version}/MANIFEST && \
-# tar czf Inline-C-%{version}.fedora.tar.gz Inline-C-%{version}
+# tar xzf Inline-C-%%{version}.tar.gz && \
+# rm -f Inline-C-%%{version}/lib/Inline/C/Cookbook.pod && \
+# sed -e '/Cookbook.pod$/d' -i Inline-C-%%{version}/MANIFEST && \
+# tar czf Inline-C-%%{version}.fedora.tar.gz Inline-C-%{version}
Source0:Inline-C-%{version}.fedora.tar.gz
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
BuildRequires: perl(Cwd)
BuildRequires: perl(Data::Dumper)
BuildRequires: perl(diagnostics)
-BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) >= 6.30
+BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) >= 6.76
BuildRequires: perl(Fcntl)
BuildRequires: perl(File::Path)
BuildRequires: perl(File::Spec)
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Warn)
BuildRequires: perl(Time::HiRes)
BuildRequires: perl(warnings)
+Requires: perl(FindBin)
Requires: perl(Inline) >= 0.58
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "$(perl -V:version)"; echo
$version))
# Split from Inline in 0.58
> TODO: Due to NO_PACKLIST=1 added in recent ExtUtil::MakeMaker, you should
> increase perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) build-time dependency to `>= 6.76'.
-BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) >= 6.30
+BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) >= 6.76
Ok.
> TODO: Constrain `perl(File::Spec)' dependency with `>= 0.8' (Makefile.PL:23).
Not addressed.
> TODO: Constrain `perl(Parse::RecDescent)' dependency with `>= 1.80'
> (Makefile.PL:25).
Not addressed.
> TODO: Constrain `perl(Test::More)' dependency with `>= 0.88' (Makefile.PL:45).
Not addressed.
> TODO: Constrain `perl(Test::Warn)' dependency with `>= 0.23' (Makefile.PL:46).
Not addressed.
> TODO: I recommend to conditionalize dependencies on Inline::Filters and
> Inline::Struct by %perl_bootstrap macro as they are optional as
> Parse::RecDescent.
Not addressed. One can add %global perl_bootstrap 1 at the beginning of the
spec file now and use the macros now.
$ rpmlint perl-Inline-C.spec ../SRPMS/perl-Inline-C-0.60-1.fc22.src.rpm
../RPMS/noarch/perl-Inline-C-0.60-1.fc22.noarch.rpm
perl-Inline-C.spec:8: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
perl-Inline-C.spec:12: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
perl-Inline-C.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: Inline-C-0.60.fedora.tar.gz
perl-Inline-C.src:8: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
perl-Inline-C.src:12: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
perl-Inline-C.src: W: invalid-url Source0: Inline-C-0.60.fedora.tar.gz
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.
> TODO: Remove under-specified dependency on `perl(Inline) >= 0.56'.
Not addressed.
$ rpm -q --requires -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Inline-C-0.60-1.fc22.noarch.rpm |
sort -f | uniq -c
1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.2)
1 perl(Carp)
1 perl(Config)
1 perl(Cwd)
1 perl(Data::Dumper)
1 perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
1 perl(Fcntl)
1 perl(File::Spec)
1 perl(FindBin)
1 perl(Inline) >= 0.56
1 perl(Inline) >= 0.58
1 perl(strict)
1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
> TODO: Remove under-specified dependency on `perl(Inline) >= 0.56'.
Not addressed.
> FIX: Run-require `perl(FindBin)' (lib/Inline/C.pm:47).
Ok.
> TODO: I recommend to run-require Inline::Filters, Inline::Struct,
> Parse::RecDescent, Time::HiRes. The code croaks without them. This is just a
> prettier die.
Not addressed.
Package builds in F22
(http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7158611). Ok.
Please consider fixing the `TODO' items before building the package.
Resolution: Package APPROVED.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1038238] Review Request: kcm-touchpad - KDE Systemsettings module for touchpads
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038238 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2014-07-17 10:48:48 --- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter --- Sorry, I forgot to close this. We'd opted to import this into the existing kcm_touchpad git module, instead of going through a new review largely to rename it to kcm-touchpad instead. Hit me up on irc if you're interested in a scratch build for testing (say, on f20 or whatever). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 956525] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-opentegra - open source Nvidia Tegra driver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956525 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review+ fedora-cvs? |fedora-review- fedora-cvs- --- Comment #20 from Dennis Gilmore --- this is not teh right way to handle package reviews I am naking it all, do it right. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1119118] Review Request: perl-App-Netdisco - Web-based network management tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119118 Bug 1119118 depends on bug 1119953, which changed state. Bug 1119953 Summary: perl-Data-Dumper-Concise-2.022 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119953 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
