[Bug 1128409] Review Request: perl-Module-Data - Introspect context information about modules in @INC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128409 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Module-Data-0.007-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Module-Data-0.007-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1128409] Review Request: perl-Module-Data - Introspect context information about modules in @INC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128409 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1127169] Review Request: perl-CPAN-Reporter - Adds CPAN Testers reporting to CPAN.pm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127169 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1127169] Review Request: perl-CPAN-Reporter - Adds CPAN Testers reporting to CPAN.pm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127169 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-CPAN-Reporter-1.2011-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CPAN-Reporter-1.2011-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834501] Review Request: python-sure - Assertion toolbox for python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834501 Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com --- Package Change Request == Package Name: python-sure New Branches: epel7 Owners: bkabrda -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1128253] Review Request: gerrymander - A client API and command line tool for gerrit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128253 --- Comment #19 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda from comment #17) (In reply to Daniel Berrange from comment #16) (In reply to Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda from comment #15) The specfile seems fine, but you should take care of the situation when with_python3 is 0 - in this situation, /usr/bin/gerrymander wouldn't work. I'd solve it like this (incomplete example): Even simpler is to just delete the 'with_python3' conditional - all current Fedora releases have python3 so might as well just rely on it existing. Yes, assuming the maintainer doesn't want to also put this package in EPEL and keep the same specfile that he has in Fedora. So do we need to create python-gerrymander or skip it? The script gerrymander points to python3 hashbang. If we think on dropping with_python3 conditionals then drop python-gerrymander also and just package gerrymander and python3-gerrymander. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1128253] Review Request: gerrymander - A client API and command line tool for gerrit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128253 --- Comment #20 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com --- (In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #19) (In reply to Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda from comment #17) (In reply to Daniel Berrange from comment #16) (In reply to Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda from comment #15) The specfile seems fine, but you should take care of the situation when with_python3 is 0 - in this situation, /usr/bin/gerrymander wouldn't work. I'd solve it like this (incomplete example): Even simpler is to just delete the 'with_python3' conditional - all current Fedora releases have python3 so might as well just rely on it existing. Yes, assuming the maintainer doesn't want to also put this package in EPEL and keep the same specfile that he has in Fedora. So do we need to create python-gerrymander or skip it? The script gerrymander points to python3 hashbang. If we think on dropping with_python3 conditionals then drop python-gerrymander also and just package gerrymander and python3-gerrymander. That is up to you. If you think people will not want to use the python-gerrymander library with Python 2 or you don't want to maintain it, you *don't have to* provide it. Having said that, many people have apps written in Python 2 that are still not compatible with Python 3, so providing both subpackages might help them with migration and testing their apps on both Python major versions. But again, this is your decision as a packager. You can start having just Python 3 subpackage and add Python 2 support if someone requests it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1131935] Review Request: json-smart - A small and very fast json parser/generator for java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131935
Michal Srb m...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Michal Srb m...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Java:
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
[x]: Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[x]: Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[x]: Javadoc subpackages should not have Requires: jpackage-utils
[x]: Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink)
Maven:
[x]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even
when building with ant
[x]: POM files have correct Maven mapping
[x]: Maven packages should use new style packaging
[x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used
[x]: Packages DO NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-
utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
[x]: Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x]: Packages use %{_mavenpomdir} instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
Upstream maintains two stable versions: 1.3 and 2.0. This package contains
1.3
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and
[Bug 1131936] Review Request: json-path - Java JsonPath implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131936 Michal Srb m...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||m...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1128253] Review Request: gerrymander - A client API and command line tool for gerrit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128253 --- Comment #21 from Daniel Berrange berra...@redhat.com --- (In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #19) So do we need to create python-gerrymander or skip it? The script gerrymander points to python3 hashbang. If we think on dropping with_python3 conditionals then drop python-gerrymander also and just package gerrymander and python3-gerrymander. Of course we should keep python-gerrymander. Plenty of the world still wants to use Python2 and it is normal Fedora practice to provide libraries for both 2 3. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1132356] New: Review Request: Mo - Mo - Micro Objects. Mo is less
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132356 Bug ID: 1132356 Summary: Review Request: Mo - Mo - Micro Objects. Mo is less Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dd...@cpan.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ddick.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Mo.spec SRPM URL: https://ddick.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Mo-0.38-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: Mo - Micro Objects. Mo is less Fedora Account System Username: ddick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1132356] Review Request: Mo - Mo - Micro Objects. Mo is less
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132356 --- Comment #1 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me --- Or maybe perl-Mo? Mo - Micro Objects. Mo is less - Micro Objects. Mo is less -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1128253] Review Request: gerrymander - A client API and command line tool for gerrit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128253 --- Comment #22 from Kashyap Chamarthy kcham...@redhat.com --- Ok, I removed the with_python3 conditionals per Dan's suggestion, and did a scratch build again (this'll generate packages: gerrymander, python-gerrymander, python3-gerrymander Updated SPEC - https://kashyapc.fedorapeople.org/spec-files/gerrymander.spec SRPM - https://kashyapc.fedorapeople.org/srpms/gerrymander-1.3-4.fc20.src.rpm Successful Koji scratch build - $ koji build --scratch rawhide /home/kashyap/rpmbuild/SRPMS/gerrymander-1.3-4.fc20.src.rpm Uploading srpm: /home/kashyap/rpmbuild/SRPMS/gerrymander-1.3-4.fc20.src.rpm [] 100% 00:00:02 33.73 KiB 13.10 KiB/sec Created task: 7430651 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7430651 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 7430651 build (rawhide, gerrymander-1.3-4.fc20.src.rpm): open (buildvm-15.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 7430652 buildArch (gerrymander-1.3-4.fc20.src.rpm, noarch): open (buildvm-16.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 7430652 buildArch (gerrymander-1.3-4.fc20.src.rpm, noarch): open (buildvm-16.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 7430651 build (rawhide, gerrymander-1.3-4.fc20.src.rpm): open (buildvm-15.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 7430651 build (rawhide, gerrymander-1.3-4.fc20.src.rpm) completed successfully -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1132356] Review Request: Mo - Mo - Micro Objects. Mo is less
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132356 --- Comment #2 from David Dick dd...@cpan.org --- koji builds rawhide at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7434565 f20 at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7434570 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1132356] Review Request: Mo - Mo - Micro Objects. Mo is less
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132356 --- Comment #3 from David Dick dd...@cpan.org --- (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1) Or maybe perl-Mo? Mo - Micro Objects. Mo is less - Micro Objects. Mo is less heh, i'm dreading when someone writes the more micro than Mo module. Happy to accept review advice on Summary and Description. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1066573] Review Request: taskd - Secure server providing multi-user, multi-client access to task data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066573 --- Comment #12 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) sanjay.an...@gmail.com --- I can't seem to get it to work with systemd systemctl start taskd.service #does not work This looks like the error: 2014-08-21 09:16:09 CA /etc/pki/taskd/ca.cert.pem 2014-08-21 09:16:09 Certificate not readable: '/etc/pki/taskd/ca.cert.pem' taskd server --daemon --data /var/lib/taskd #works fine -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1131935] Review Request: json-smart - A small and very fast json parser/generator for java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131935 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- Thanks for the review New Package SCM Request === Package Name: json-smart Short Description: A small and very fast json parser/generator for java Owners: gil Branches: f21 InitialCC: java-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1127720] Review Request: perl-MooX-ConfigFromFile - Moo eXtension for initializing objects from config file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127720 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-MooX-ConfigFromFile-0.002-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1082656] Review Request: python-diff-cover - Automatically find diff lines that need test coverage
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082656 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-diff-cover-0.6.0-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1129484] Review Request: bustle - Draw pretty sequence diagrams of D-Bus traffic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129484 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On|1132275 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132275 [Bug 1132275] ghc-rpm-macros should run ghc-deps.sh using a fileattrs file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1132356] Review Request: perl-Mo - Mo - Micro Objects. Mo is less
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132356 David Dick dd...@cpan.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: Mo - Mo - |Review Request: perl-Mo - |Micro Objects. Mo is less |Mo - Micro Objects. Mo is ||less -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1132356] Review Request: perl-Mo - Micro Objects. Mo is less
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132356 David Dick dd...@cpan.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: perl-Mo - |Review Request: perl-Mo - |Mo - Micro Objects. Mo is |Micro Objects. Mo is less |less| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1131543] Review Request: python-flask-xml-rpc - Adds support for creating XML-RPC APIs to Flask
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131543 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com --- Review: + mock build is successful for f22. - rpmlint output on rpms gave python-flask-xml-rpc.src: E: invalid-spec-name 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. = python-Flask-XML-RPC.spec should be python-flask-xml-rpc.spec See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Spec_file_name + Source verified with upstream as (sha256sum) srpm tarball :4adc7482240a916e8c2205cba38b4bd6e648692d189419686a3116768fa48ab7 upstream tarball :4adc7482240a916e8c2205cba38b4bd6e648692d189419686a3116768fa48ab7 + License MIT is valid - License text is not included in package = see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text which suggests MIT license package needs license text also. Ask upstream to provide license text - Package must own all directories that it creates. = Directory /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/flaskext not owned + rest looks following packaging guidelines. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1128253] Review Request: gerrymander - A client API and command line tool for gerrit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128253 Kashyap Chamarthy kcham...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 902086] Review request: Elasticsearch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902086 --- Comment #34 from jiri vanek jva...@redhat.com --- ok. I'm doing something wrong or I dont know :( Packaging the https://github.com/mycila/license-maven-plugin nedds https://github.com/mycila/licenses/ which needs maven-wagon-webdav , which, although maven-wagon is packed for f21, is excluded with missing dependences Checking state of webdav with maintainers now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1131543] Review Request: python-flask-xml-rpc - Adds support for creating XML-RPC APIs to Flask
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131543 --- Comment #5 from Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr --- = python-Flask-XML-RPC.spec should be python-flask-xml-rpc.spec See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Spec_file_name Adjusted. - License text is not included in package = see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text which suggests MIT license package needs license text also. Ask upstream to provide license text This has been done already: https://bitbucket.org/leafstorm/flask-xml-rpc/pull-request/1/ (Thus the commented LICENSE in the %files section) = Directory /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/flaskext not owned That one is used by every flask extension. Adjusted. Spec URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs//python-Flask-XML-RPC.spec SRPM URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs//python-flask-xml-rpc-0.1.2-2.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1128253] Review Request: gerrymander - A client API and command line tool for gerrit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128253 --- Comment #23 from Kashyap Chamarthy kcham...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: gerrymander Short Description: A client API and command line tool for gerrit Upstream URL: http://github.com/berrange/gerrymander Owners: kashyapc Branches: f20 21 InitialCC: berrange -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1121082] Review Request: rubygem-clockwork - A scheduler process to replace cron
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121082 František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||val...@civ.zcu.cz Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|val...@civ.zcu.cz Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz --- Taking the review... Can we do review swap with #1131991 (rubygem-logstash-event)? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1131543] Review Request: python-flask-xml-rpc - Adds support for creating XML-RPC APIs to Flask
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131543 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com --- I wonder why no package or python-flask not owning /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/flaskext. Maybe that can be worked on later on. I also assume above spec link is wrongly pasted. APPROVED above srpm. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 833226] Review Request: python-pycparser - C parser and AST generator written in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833226 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 833226] Review Request: python-pycparser - C parser and AST generator written in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833226 --- Comment #41 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834501] Review Request: python-sure - Assertion toolbox for python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834501 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Already exists. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 853050] Review Request: hawtbuf - A rich byte buffer library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853050 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834501] Review Request: python-sure - Assertion toolbox for python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834501 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 853050] Review Request: hawtbuf - A rich byte buffer library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853050 --- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 967568] Review Request: mintmenu - Advanced Menu for the MATE Desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967568 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 967568] Review Request: mintmenu - Advanced Menu for the MATE Desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967568 --- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 986608] Review Request: weasyprint - Utility and Python library to render HTML and CSS to PDF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986608 --- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 986608] Review Request: weasyprint - Utility and Python library to render HTML and CSS to PDF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986608 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 986630] Review Request: python-tinycss - CSS parser for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986630 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 986630] Review Request: python-tinycss - CSS parser for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986630 --- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 986634] Review Request: python-pyphen - Pure Python module to hyphenate text
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986634 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 986634] Review Request: python-pyphen - Pure Python module to hyphenate text
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986634 --- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 986715] Review Request: python-cairocffi - cffi-based cairo bindings for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986715 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 986715] Review Request: python-cairocffi - cffi-based cairo bindings for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986715 --- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 998219] Review Request: mate-themes-extras - GTK-2/3 themes for GTK based desktops
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998219 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 998219] Review Request: mate-themes-extras - GTK-2/3 themes for GTK based desktops
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998219 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1104291] Review Request: python-BTrees - Scalable persistent object containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104291 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1104291] Review Request: python-BTrees - Scalable persistent object containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104291 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1122231] Review Request: nodejs-proxy-agent - Maps proxy protocols to http.Agent implementations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122231 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1122231] Review Request: nodejs-proxy-agent - Maps proxy protocols to http.Agent implementations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122231 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1117209] Review Request: sscep - Simple SCEP client with modifications for engine support more
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117209 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1117209] Review Request: sscep - Simple SCEP client with modifications for engine support more
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117209 --- Comment #29 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Please use your FAS account name, not your real name. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1127879] Review Request: gnudiff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127879 --- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1127879] Review Request: gnudiff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127879 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1127894] Review Request: jsap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127894 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1128253] Review Request: gerrymander - A client API and command line tool for gerrit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128253 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1128253] Review Request: gerrymander - A client API and command line tool for gerrit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128253 --- Comment #24 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1130674] Review Request: python-pyo - Python digital signal processing module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1130674 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1130674] Review Request: python-pyo - Python digital signal processing module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1130674 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1131935] Review Request: json-smart - A small and very fast json parser/generator for java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131935 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1131935] Review Request: json-smart - A small and very fast json parser/generator for java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131935 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1049116] Review Request: ns2 - The Network Simulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049116 --- Comment #3 from Mosaab Alzoubi moc...@hotmail.com --- Thanx Alot Seng. I'll merege them soon, Patch These too : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047497 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047702 They are requires :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1117209] Review Request: sscep - Simple SCEP client with modifications for engine support more
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117209 Thorsten Scherf tsch...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #30 from Thorsten Scherf tsch...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: sscep Short Description: Simple SCEP client with modifications for engine support more Upstream URL: https://github.com/certnanny/sscep Owners: tscherf Branches: f20 f21 el6 epel7 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1131936] Review Request: json-path - Java JsonPath implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131936 Bug 1131936 depends on bug 1131935, which changed state. Bug 1131935 Summary: Review Request: json-smart - A small and very fast json parser/generator for java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131935 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1131935] Review Request: json-smart - A small and very fast json parser/generator for java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131935 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||json-smart-1.3-0.1.20140820 ||.fc21 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-08-21 08:51:14 --- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- Task Info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7435007 Build Info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=569719 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1117209] Review Request: sscep - Simple SCEP client with modifications for engine support more
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117209 --- Comment #31 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1067665] Review Request: xtrace - Utility for tracing X11 protocol for debugging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067665 --- Comment #23 from David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com --- The Fedora xtrace package has now been marked retired. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1117209] Review Request: sscep - Simple SCEP client with modifications for engine support more
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117209 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1122231] Review Request: nodejs-proxy-agent - Maps proxy protocols to http.Agent implementations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122231 Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-08-21 09:15:58 --- Comment #7 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com --- Built in rawhide. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1122244] Review Request: nodejs-superagent-proxy - Request proxy(uri) superagent extension
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122244 Bug 1122244 depends on bug 1122231, which changed state. Bug 1122231 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-proxy-agent - Maps proxy protocols to http.Agent implementations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122231 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1122231] Review Request: nodejs-proxy-agent - Maps proxy protocols to http.Agent implementations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122231 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-proxy-agent-1.1.0-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-proxy-agent-1.1.0-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1122231] Review Request: nodejs-proxy-agent - Maps proxy protocols to http.Agent implementations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122231 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-proxy-agent-1.1.0-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-proxy-agent-1.1.0-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1131616] Review Request: python-copr-client - Python client to access copr service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131616
--- Comment #2 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com ---
The name python-copr-client is confusing. This is simple interaction with Copr
using its API and can do many thing. I would suggest to rename it to:
python-copr
#rm -rf %{buildroot}
Why to leave there commented code? Just remove it.
Also for review please submit SRPM with simple release. I.e. do not create
package with 'tito --test'.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1121080] Review Request: rubygem-sprite-factory - Automatic CSS sprite generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121080 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|msu...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1132542] New: Review Request: perl-Module-Install-TestML - Module::Install support for TestML
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132542 Bug ID: 1132542 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Install-TestML - Module::Install support for TestML Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Module-Install-TestML/perl-Module-Install-TestML.spec SRPM URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Module-Install-TestML/perl-Module-Install-TestML-0.02-1.fc22.src.rpm Description: This module adds the use_testml_tap directive to Module::Install. Fedora Account System Username: ppisar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1132542] Review Request: perl-Module-Install-TestML - Module::Install support for TestML
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132542 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com ||/show_bug.cgi?id=1131090 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1121080] Review Request: rubygem-sprite-factory - Automatic CSS sprite generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121080 --- Comment #1 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com --- Hmm package does not build: + ruby -rminitest/autorun -rrubygems -Ilib:test - + egrep '43 runs, 211 assertions, 3 failures, 0 errors, 0 skips.*' -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1090112] Review Request: perl-CPAN - Query, download and build perl modules from CPAN sites
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090112 --- Comment #7 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- Waiting on perl-5.20 rebase in F22. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1090112] Review Request: perl-CPAN - Query, download and build perl modules from CPAN sites
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090112 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1132321 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132321 [Bug 1132321] cpan should offer creating site directories -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1131543] Review Request: python-flask-xml-rpc - Adds support for creating XML-RPC APIs to Flask
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131543 --- Comment #7 from Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr --- Sorry yes, wrong copy paste, the latest one is at: https://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs//python-flask-xml-rpc.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1131616] Review Request: python-copr-client - Python client to access copr service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131616 --- Comment #3 from Valentin Gologuzov vgolo...@redhat.com --- SPEC: http://people.redhat.com/~vgologuz/python_copr/python-copr.spec SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/~vgologuz/python_copr/python-copr-1.45-1.fc20.src.rpm The name python-copr-client is confusing. Renamed Why to leave there commented code? Just remove it. Cleaned it. I.e. do not create package with 'tito --test'. Ok, built from actual tag. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1126045] Review Request: perl-IO-Pager - Select a pager and pipe text to it if destination is a TTY
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126045 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- Debian had problems with the former license until upstream changed the wording to the current one (Or, if you prefer). See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=508249. Devrim, please correct the License value to GPL+ or Artistic in order to proceed this review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1132356] Review Request: perl-Mo - Micro Objects. Mo is less
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132356 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- I think the summary could be better. The upstream's one is too artistic, not suitable for good summary. E.g. Perl micro-object system. The description looks good aside the OO. I would expand it to object-oriented system or just object system. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1131543] Review Request: python-flask-xml-rpc - Adds support for creating XML-RPC APIs to Flask
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131543 --- Comment #8 from Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-flask-xml-rpc Short Description: Adds support for creating XML-RPC APIs to Flask Upstream URL: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/Flask-XML-RPC Owners: pingou Branches: master, f21, epel7 InitialCC: group::fedora-infra -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1131543] Review Request: python-flask-xml-rpc - Adds support for creating XML-RPC APIs to Flask
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131543 --- Comment #9 from Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr --- Wrong group New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-flask-xml-rpc Short Description: Adds support for creating XML-RPC APIs to Flask Upstream URL: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/Flask-XML-RPC Owners: pingou Branches: master, f21, epel7 InitialCC: group::infra-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1132356] Review Request: perl-Mo - Micro Objects. Mo is less
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132356 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rc040...@freenet.de --- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de --- I am wondering about the explicit Requires (They seem to be correct). Seems like this package is wanting win a code obscurity contest. Apparently their approach is sufficent to confuse rpm's automatic dep tracking ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1131284] Review Request: webkitgtk4 - GTK+ Web content engine library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131284 Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(kalevlember@gmail | |.com) | --- Comment #13 from Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com --- * Thu Aug 21 2014 Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com - 2.5.3-3 - More package review fixes (#1131284) - Correct the license tag to read LGPLv2 - Filter out provides for private libraries Spec URL: https://kalev.fedorapeople.org/webkitgtk4.spec SRPM URL: https://kalev.fedorapeople.org/webkitgtk4-2.5.3-3.fc22.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7435643 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1132603] New: Review Request: dbxtool - Secure Boot DBX updater
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132603 Bug ID: 1132603 Summary: Review Request: dbxtool - Secure Boot DBX updater Product: Fedora Version: 21 Component: Package Review Assignee: a...@redhat.com Reporter: pjo...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Flags: fedora-review? Spec URL: http://pjones.fedorapeople.org/dbxtool/dbxtool.spec SRPM URL: http://pjones.fedorapeople.org/dbxtool/dbxtool-0.4-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: This package contains DBX updates for UEFI Secure Boot. Fedora Account System Username: pjones -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1130581] Review Request: perl-Devel-CheckBin - Check that a command is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1130581 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1130581] Review Request: perl-Devel-CheckBin - Check that a command is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1130581 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Devel-CheckBin-0.02-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Devel-CheckBin-0.02-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1130581] Review Request: perl-Devel-CheckBin - Check that a command is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1130581 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Devel-CheckBin-0.02-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Devel-CheckBin-0.02-2.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1127879] Review Request: gnudiff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127879 Ismael Olea ism...@olea.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-08-21 11:52:52 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1132603] Review Request: dbxtool - Secure Boot DBX updater
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132603
Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com ---
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[X]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[X]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
MIT/X11 (BSD like), GPL (v2), Unknown or generated. 8 files have
unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/ajax/fedora/dbxtool/1132603-dbxtool/licensecheck.txt
[X]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/share/licenses
Artifact of doing the test build against F20 since F21 is still unsigned...
[X]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/systemd/system,
/usr/share/licenses, /usr/lib/systemd
[X]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[X]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[X]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[X]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[X]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[X]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[X]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[X]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[X]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[X]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[X]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[X]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[X]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[X]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[X]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[!]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro.
Small enough not to matter.
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[X]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[X]: Package functions as described.
[X]: Latest version is packaged.
[X]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[-]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly
[Bug 1132603] Review Request: dbxtool - Secure Boot DBX updater
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132603 --- Comment #2 from Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com --- Rpmlint --- Checking: dbxtool-0.4-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm dbxtool-0.4-1.fc20.src.rpm dbxtool.src: W: invalid-url Source0: https://github.com/vathpela/dbxtool/releases/download/dbxtool-0.4/dbxtool-0. 4.tar.bz2 HTTP Error 403: Forbidden 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Note that this appears to be an rpmlint bug. If you wget the same url, you get a 302 redirect to an s3.amazonaws.com url that then gives a 200 and it downloads just fine. No idea where rpmlint is going wrong here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1132603] Review Request: dbxtool - Secure Boot DBX updater
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132603 Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1127894] Review Request: jsap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127894 Ismael Olea ism...@olea.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-08-21 12:09:52 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1066573] Review Request: taskd - Secure server providing multi-user, multi-client access to task data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066573 --- Comment #13 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com --- Ankur, what user owns /etc/pki/taskd/ca.cert.pem ? the taskd user? Here is a new release with the log setting tweak suggested by lmacken: Spec URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/SPECS/taskd.spec SRPM URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/SRPMS/taskd-1.0.0-9.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1132603] Review Request: dbxtool - Secure Boot DBX updater
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132603 --- Comment #3 from Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: dbxtool Short Description: This package contains DBX updates for UEFI Secure Boot. Owners: pjones Branches: f19 f20 f21 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1104291] Review Request: python-BTrees - Scalable persistent object containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104291 Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-08-21 13:30:04 --- Comment #10 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com --- This package has been built for Rawhide and F21. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
